Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deleting a document should be possible when all order lines are marked as received #2689

Closed
pronguen opened this issue Feb 8, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
correction An implemented feature doesn't work as expected. duplicate f: acquisitions Related to the acquisition module f: permissions Concerns the rights management p-Medium Medium priority (to be solved within 1-2 years)

Comments

@pronguen
Copy link
Contributor

pronguen commented Feb 8, 2022

How it works

Currently, it is not possible to delete a document when an order line is linked, whatever the status of the order line is.

How it should works

  • It is possible to delete a document with order lines attached, but only if all the items ordered have been received (or cancelled).
  • The display of the closed order line and receipt are not impacted by the deletion of the document
@pronguen pronguen added f: permissions Concerns the rights management correction f: acquisitions Related to the acquisition module p-Medium Medium priority (to be solved within 1-2 years) labels Feb 8, 2022
@PascalRepond PascalRepond added bug Breaks something but is not blocking and removed class: correction labels Feb 21, 2022
@PascalRepond PascalRepond added correction An implemented feature doesn't work as expected. and removed bug Breaks something but is not blocking labels Mar 14, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open 6 months with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Stale or no longer relevant label Sep 11, 2022
@PascalRepond PascalRepond removed the stale Stale or no longer relevant label Sep 12, 2022
@PascalRepond PascalRepond reopened this Sep 12, 2022
@PascalRepond
Copy link
Contributor

Duplicate of #3225

@PascalRepond PascalRepond marked this as a duplicate of #3225 Feb 7, 2023
@PascalRepond PascalRepond closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Feb 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
correction An implemented feature doesn't work as expected. duplicate f: acquisitions Related to the acquisition module f: permissions Concerns the rights management p-Medium Medium priority (to be solved within 1-2 years)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants