You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We don't have a retention policy for the subscriber_notification table and all processed messages are stored increasing the Postgres storage size. With the increasing messages throughput the storage size will grow a lot so we need to make a retention policy for the data in Postgres.
Upd. As we need to preserve the history data for users, we can possibly distinguish storage for hot and cold (history) data for performance and cost savings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
geekbrother
changed the title
feat: retention policy for the postgres data
feat: retention policy for the postgres data or distinguish storage for hot and cold data
Nov 17, 2023
We don't have a retention policy for the
subscriber_notification
table and all processed messages are stored increasing the Postgres storage size. With the increasing messages throughput the storage size will grow a lot so we need to make a retention policy for the data in Postgres.Upd. As we need to preserve the history data for users, we can possibly distinguish storage for hot and cold (history) data for performance and cost savings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: