testing-raw.txt

I Rockwell NNP
I International NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Tulsa NNP
I unit NN
O said VBD
I it PRP
O signed VBD
I a DT
I tentative JJ
I agreement NN
O extending VBG
I its PRP<dollar>
I contract NN
O with IN
I Boeing NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O to TO
O provide VB
I structural JJ
I parts NNS
O for IN
I Boeing NNP
B <apost>s POS
I 747 CD
I jetliners NNS
O <period> <period>
I Rockwell NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I agreement NN
O calls VBZ
O for IN
I it PRP
O to TO
O supply VB
I 200 CD
I additional JJ
I so-called JJ
I shipsets NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I planes NNS
O <period> <period>
I These DT
O include VBP
O <comma> <comma>
O among IN
I other JJ
I parts NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I each DT
I jetliner NN
B <apost>s POS
I two CD
I major JJ
I bulkheads NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I pressure NN
I floor NN
O <comma> <comma>
I torque NN
I box NN
O <comma> <comma>
I fixed VBN
I leading VBG
I edges NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I wings NNS
O and CC
I an DT
I aft JJ
I keel NN
I beam NN
O <period> <period>
O Under IN
I the DT
I existing VBG
I contract NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Rockwell NNP
O said VBD
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O has VBZ
O already RB
O delivered VBN
I 793 CD
O of IN
I the DT
I shipsets NNS
O to TO
I Boeing NNP
O <period> <period>
I Rockwell NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O based VBN
O in IN
I El NNP
I Segundo NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Calif<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
I an DT
I aerospace NN
I <comma> <comma>
I electronics NNS
I <comma> <comma>
I automotive JJ
I and CC
I graphics NNS
I concern VBP
O <period> <period>
I Frank NNP
I Carlucci NNP
I III NNP
O was VBD
O named VBN
O to TO
I this DT
I telecommunications NNS
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I board NN
O <comma> <comma>
O filling VBG
I the DT
I vacancy NN
O created VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I death NN
O of IN
I William NNP
I Sobey NNP
B last JJ
I May NNP
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Carlucci NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 59 CD
I years NNS
O old JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O served VBN
O as IN
I defense NN
I secretary NN
O in IN
I the DT
I Reagan NNP
I administration NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I January NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O accepted VBD
I the DT
I position NN
O of IN
I vice NN
I chairman NN
O of IN
I Carlyle NNP
I Group NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I merchant NN
I banking NN
I concern NN
O <period> <period>
I SHEARSON NNP
I LEHMAN NNP
I HUTTON NNP
I Inc NNP
I <period> <period>
I Thomas NNP
I E<period> NNP
I Meador NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 42 CD
I years NNS
O old JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
O named VBN
I president NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I operating VBG
I officer NN
O of IN
I Balcor NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Skokie NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Ill<period> NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I subsidiary NN
O of IN
I this DT
I New NNP
I York NNP
I investment NN
I banking NN
I firm NN
O <period> <period>
I Balcor NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O has VBZ
I interests NNS
O in IN
I real JJ
I estate NN
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I the DT
I position NN
O is VBZ
O newly RB
O created VBN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Meador NNP
O had VBD
O been VBN
I executive JJ
I vice NN
I president NN
O of IN
I Balcor NNP
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I addition NN
O to TO
I his PRP<dollar>
I previous JJ
I real-estate NN
I investment NN
I and CC
I asset-management NN
I duties NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Meador NNP
O takes VBZ
I responsibility NN
O for IN
I development NN
O and CC
I property NN
I management NN
O <period> <period>
I Those DT
I duties NNS
O had VBD
O been VBN
O held VBN
O by IN
I Van NNP
I Pell NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 44 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O resigned VBD
O as IN
I an DT
I executive JJ
I vice NN
I president NN
O <period> <period>
I Shearson NNP
O is VBZ
O about IN
O 60<percent>-held JJ
O by IN
I American NNP
I Express NNP
I Co NNP
O <period> <period>
I Great NNP
I American NNP
I Bank NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O citing VBG
I depressed JJ
I Arizona NNP
I real JJ
I estate NN
I prices NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O posted VBD
I a DT
I third-quarter JJ
I loss NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 59<period>4 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>48 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I savings NNS
I bank VBP
O had VBD
I earnings NNS
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 8<period>1 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 33 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I the DT
I nine CD
I months NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O had VBD
I a DT
I loss NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 58<period>3 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>44 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O after IN
I earnings NNS
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 29<period>5 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>20 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I the DT
I 1988 CD
I period NN
O <period> <period>
I Great NNP
I American NNP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O increased VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I loan-loss NN
I reserves NNS
O by IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 93 CD
I million CD
O after IN
O reviewing VBG
I its PRP<dollar>
I loan NN
I portfolio NN
O <comma> <comma>
O raising VBG
I its PRP<dollar>
I total JJ
I loan NN
I and CC
I real JJ
I estate NN
I reserves NNS
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 217 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
O Before IN
I the DT
I loan-loss NN
I addition NN
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O said VBD
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O had VBD
I operating VBG
I profit NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 10 CD
I million CD
O for IN
I the DT
I quarter NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I move NN
O followed VBD
I a DT
I round NN
O of IN
I similar JJ
I increases NNS
O by IN
I other JJ
I lenders NNS
O against IN
I Arizona NNP
I real JJ
I estate NN
I loans NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O reflecting VBG
I a DT
I continuing VBG
I decline NN
O in IN
I that DT
I market NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I addition NN
O to TO
I the DT
I increased VBN
I reserve NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I savings NNS
I bank VBP
O took VBD
I a DT
I special JJ
I charge NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 5 NN
I million CD
O representing VBG
I general JJ
I and CC
I administrative JJ
I expenses NNS
O from IN
I staff NN
I reductions NNS
O and CC
I other JJ
I matters NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I it PRP
O posted VBD
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 7<period>6 CD
I million CD
I reduction NN
O in IN
I expected VBN
I mortgage NN
I servicing NN
I fees NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O reflecting VBG
I the DT
I fact NN
O that IN
I more JJR
I borrowers NNS
O are VBP
O prepaying VBG
I their PRP<dollar>
I mortgages NNS
O <period> <period>
I Arbitragers NNS
O were VBD
O n<apost>t RB
I the DT
I only RB
I big JJ
I losers NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I collapse NN
O of IN
I UAL NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
I stock NN
O <period> <period>
O Look VB
O at IN
I what WP
O happened VBD
O to TO
I UAL NNP
B <apost>s POS
I chairman NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Stephen NNP
I M<period> NNP
I Wolf NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I its PRP<dollar>
I chief JJ
I financial JJ
I officer NN
O <comma> <comma>
I John NNP
I C<period> NNP
I Pope NNP
O <period> <period>
O On IN
I a DT
I day NN
B some DT
I United NNP
I Airlines NNPS
I employees NNS
O wanted VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Wolf NNP
O fired VBD
O and CC
I takeover NN
I stock NN
I speculators NNS
O wanted VBD
I his PRP<dollar>
I scalp NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Messrs<period> NNP
I Wolf NNP
I and CC
I Pope NNP
O saw VBD
I their PRP<dollar>
I prospective JJ
I personal JJ
I fortunes NNS
O continue VBP
O to TO
O plummet VB
O as IN
I shares NNS
O of IN
I UAL NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I United NNP
B <apost>s POS
I parent NN
I company NN
O <comma> <comma>
O dived VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 24<period>875 CD
O on IN
I the DT
I Big NNP
I Board NNP
O to TO
O close VB
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 198 CD
O <period> <period>
O Including VBG
I Monday NNP
B <apost>s POS
I plunge NN
O <comma> <comma>
I that WDT
O has VBZ
O given VBN
I the DT
I two CD
I executives NNS
B paper NN
I losses NNS
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 49<period>5 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O based VBN
O on IN
I what WP
B they PRP
O would MD
O have VB
O realized VBN
O had VBN
I the DT
I pilots NNS
I and CC
I management-led JJ
I buy-out NN
O of IN
I UAL NNP
O gone VBN
O through IN
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 300 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <period> <period>
O When WRB
I bank NN
I financing NN
O for IN
I the DT
I buy-out NN
O collapsed VBD
I last JJ
I week NN
O <comma> <comma>
O so RB
O did VBD
I UAL NNP
B <apost>s POS
I stock NN
O <period> <period>
O Even RB
O if IN
I the DT
I banks NNS
O resurrect VBP
I a DT
I financing NN
I package NN
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 250 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I two CD
I executives NNS
O would MD
O still RB
O get VB
I about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 25 CD
I million CD
O less JJR
O than IN
I they PRP
O stood VBD
O to TO
O gain VB
O in IN
I the DT
I initial JJ
I transaction NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Wolf NNP
O owns VBZ
I 75<comma>000 CD
I UAL NNP
I shares NNS
O and CC
O has VBZ
I options NNS
O to TO
O buy VB
I another DT
I 250<comma>000 CD
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 83<period>3125 CD
B each DT
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I the DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 300-a-share JJ
I buyout NN
O <comma> <comma>
I that WDT
O totaled VBD
I about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 76<period>7 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
O By IN
I yesterday NN
B <apost>s POS
I close NN
O of IN
I trading NN
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O was VBD
O good JJ
O for IN
I a DT
I paltry JJ
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 43<period>5 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
O Of IN
I course NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Wolf NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 48 CD
I years NNS
O old JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O has VBZ
I some DT
I savings NNS
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O left VBD
I his PRP<dollar>
I last JJ
I two CD
I jobs NNS
O at IN
I Republic NNP
I Airlines NNPS
O and CC
I Flying NNP
I Tiger NNP
O with IN
I combined VBN
I stock-option NN
I gains NNS
O of IN
I about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 22 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I UAL NNP
O gave VBD
I him PRP
B a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 15 CD
I million CD
I bonus NN
O when WRB
I it PRP
O hired VBD
I him PRP
O <period> <period>
I His PRP<dollar>
I 1988 CD
I salary NN
O was VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 575<comma>000 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 575<comma>000 CD
I bonus NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I 40-year JJ
I old JJ
I Mr<period> NNP
I Pope NNP
O has VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O changed VBN
I jobs NNS
O enough RB
O -- =colon=
I at IN
I least JJS
I the DT
I right NN
I ones NNS
O -- =colon=
O to TO
O stash VB
O away RB
I that DT
I kind NN
O of IN
I money NN
O <period> <period>
I United NNP
O paid VBD
I him PRP
B a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 375<comma>000 CD
I bonus NN
O to TO
O lure VB
I him PRP
O away RB
O from IN
I American NNP
I Airlines NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I he PRP
O was VBD
O paid VBN
I a DT
I salary NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 342<comma>122 CD
B last JJ
I year NN
O with IN
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 280<comma>000 CD
I bonus NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Pope NNP
O owns VBZ
I 10<comma>000 CD
I UAL NNP
I shares NNS
O and CC
O has VBZ
I options NNS
O to TO
O buy VB
I another DT
I 150<comma>000 CD
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 69 CD
B each DT
O <period> <period>
I That DT
O came VBD
O to TO
I a DT
I combined VBN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 37<period>7 CD
I million CD
O under IN
I the DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 300-a-share JJ
I buy-out NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I just RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 21<period>3 CD
I million CD
O at IN
I yesterday NN
B <apost>s POS
I close NN
O <period> <period>
O Of IN
I the DT
I combined VBN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 114<period>4 CD
I million CD
B the DT
I two CD
I men NNS
O were VBD
O scheduled VBN
O to TO
O reap VB
O under IN
I the DT
I buy-out NN
O <comma> <comma>
I they PRP
O agreed VBD
O to TO
O invest VB
O in IN
I the DT
I buy-out NN
B just RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 15 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O angering VBG
I many NN
O of IN
I the DT
I thousands NNS
O of IN
I workers NNS
O asked VBD
O to TO
O make VB
I pay NN
I concessions NNS
O so RB
I the DT
I buy-out NN
O would MD
O be VB
I a DT
I success NN
O <period> <period>
I United NNP
B <apost>s POS
I directors NNS
O voted VBD
I themselves PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I their PRP<dollar>
I spouses NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I lifetime NN
I access NN
O to TO
I the DT
I Friendly NNP
I Skies NNPS
O -- =colon=
I free JJ
I first-class JJ
I travel NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 20<comma>000 CD
B a DT
I year NN
O for IN
I life NN
O as IN
O well RB
O <period> <period>
O Conceivably RB
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I a DT
I scaled-back JJ
I buy-out NN
O <comma> <comma>
I they PRP
O could MD
O be VB
O bumped VBN
O back RB
O to TO
I coach NN
I seats NNS
O for IN
I life NN
O <period> <period>
I Thomas NNP
I H<period> NNP
I Johnson NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I president NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Coatedboard NNP
I division NN
O of IN
I Mead NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
O named VBN
I president NN
O of IN
I Manville NNP
I Forest NNP
I Products NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Manville NNP
I unit NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I senior JJ
I vice NN
I president NN
O of IN
I Manville NNP
I Corp NNP
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Johnson NNP
O succeeds VBZ
I Harry NNP
I W<period> NNP
I Sherman NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O resigned VBD
O to TO
O pursue VB
I other JJ
I interests NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I both DT
I positions NNS
O <period> <period>
I Manville NNP
O is VBZ
I a DT
I building NN
I and CC
I forest NN
I products NNS
I concern VBP
O <period> <period>
I US PRP
I Facilities NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O said VBD
I Robert NNP
I J<period> NNP
I Percival NNP
O agreed VBD
O to TO
O step VB
O down RB
O as IN
I vice NN
I chairman NN
O of IN
I the DT
I insurance NN
I holding VBG
I company NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I There EX
O was VBD
I a DT
I difference NN
O of IN
I opinion NN
O as IN
O to TO
I the DT
I future NN
I direction NN
O of IN
I the DT
I company NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I a DT
I spokeswoman NN
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Percival NNP
O declined VBD
O to TO
O comment VB
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I a DT
I statement NN
O <comma> <comma>
I US PRP
I Facilities NNPS
O said VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Percival NNP
B <apost>s POS
I employment NN
I contract NN
O calls VBZ
O for IN
I him PRP
O to TO
O act VB
O as IN
I a DT
I consultant NN
O to TO
I the DT
I company NN
O for IN
I two CD
I years NNS
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O will MD
O also RB
O remain VB
I a DT
I director NN
O <comma> <comma>
I US PRP
I Facilities NNPS
O said VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O wo MD
O n<apost>t RB
O serve VB
O on IN
I any DT
I board NN
I committees NNS
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Percival NNP
O will MD
O be VB
O succeeded VBN
O on IN
I an DT
I interim JJ
I basis NN
O by IN
I George NNP
I Kadonada NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I US PRP
I Facilities NNPS
I chairman NN
I and CC
I president NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I the DT
I same JJ
I statement NN
O <comma> <comma>
I US PRP
I Facilities NNPS
O also RB
O said VBD
I it PRP
O had VBD
O bought VBN
O back RB
I 112<comma>000 CD
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I common JJ
I shares NNS
O in IN
I a DT
I private JJ
I transaction NN
O <period> <period>
I Terms NNS
O were VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O disclosed VBN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I buy-back NN
O represents VBZ
I about IN
I 3 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I the DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I shares NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O based VBN
O on IN
I the DT
I 3<period>7 CD
I million CD
I shares NNS
O outstanding JJ
O as IN
O of IN
I Sept<period> NNP
I 30 CD
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I national JJ
I over-the-counter JJ
I trading NN
B yesterday NN
O <comma> <comma>
I US PRP
I Facilities NNPS
O closed VBD
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 3<period>625 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O unchanged JJ
O <period> <period>
I Three CD
I leading VBG
I drug NN
I companies NNS
O reported VBD
I robust JJ
I third-quarter JJ
I earnings NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O bolstered VBN
O by IN
I strong JJ
I sales NNS
O of IN
I newer JJR
I <comma> <comma>
I big-selling JJ
I prescriptions NNS
I drugs NNS
B that WDT
O provide VBP
I hefty JJ
I profit NN
I margins NNS
O <period> <period>
I Merck NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co<period> NNP
O reported VBD
I a DT
I 25 CD
I <percent> NN
I increase NN
O in IN
I earnings NNS
O <colon> =colon=
I Warner-Lambert NNP
I Co<period> NNP
B <apost>s POS
I profit NN
O rose VBD
I 22 CD
I <percent> NN
O and CC
I Eli NNP
I Lilly NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co<period> NNP
B <apost>s POS
I net JJ
I income NN
O rose VBD
I 24 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I results NNS
O were VBD
O in IN
I line NN
O with IN
I analysts NNS
B <apost> POS
I expectations NNS
O <period> <period>
I Merck NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co NNP
I <period> <period>
I Merck NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Rahway NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I N<period>J<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O continued VBD
O to TO
O lead VB
I the DT
I industry NN
O with IN
I a DT
I strong JJ
I sales NNS
I performance NN
O in IN
I the DT
I human NN
I and CC
I animal NN
I health-products NNS
I segment VBP
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I stronger JJR
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I dollar NN
O reduced VBD
I third-quarter JJ
I and CC
I first-nine-month JJ
I sales NNS
I growth NN
B 2 CD
I <percent> NN
I and CC
I 3 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O respectively RB
O <period> <period>
I International JJ
I sales NNS
O accounted VBD
O for IN
I 47 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I total JJ
I company NN
I sales NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I nine CD
I months NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O compared VBN
O with IN
I 50 CD
I <percent> NN
B a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
I Sales NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I quarter NN
O rose VBD
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>63 CD
I billion CD
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>47 CD
I billion CD
O <period> <period>
I Mevacor NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Merck NNP
B <apost>s POS
I new JJ
I cholesterol-lowering JJ
I drug NN
O <comma> <comma>
O had VBD
I higher JJR
I sales NNS
O than IN
I any DT
I other JJ
I prescription NN
I medicine NN
O has VBZ
O ever RB
O achieved VBN
O in IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O in IN
I the DT
I year NN
O following VBG
I introduction NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I company NN
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I drug NN
O was VBD
O introduced VBN
O in IN
I West NNP
I Germany NNP
B this DT
I year NN
O <period> <period>
I Intense JJ
I competition NN
O <comma> <comma>
O however RB
O <comma> <comma>
O led VBN
O to TO
I unit NN
I sales NNS
I declines NNS
O for IN
I a DT
I group NN
O of IN
I Merck NNP
B <apost>s POS
I established VBN
I human NN
I and CC
I animal-health NN
I products NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O including VBG
I Aldomet NNP
I and CC
I Indocin NNP
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I New NNP
I York NNP
I Stock NNP
I Exchange NNP
I composite JJ
I trading NN
B yesterday NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Merck NNP
I shares NNS
O closed VBD
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 75<period>25 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O up IN
I 50 CD
I cents NNS
O <period> <period>
I Warner-Lambert NNP
I Co NNP
I <period> <period>
I Warner-Lambert NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Morris NNP
I Plains NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I N<period>J<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O reported VBD
I sales NNS
B that WDT
O were VBD
I a DT
I record NN
O for IN
I any DT
I quarter NN
O and CC
I the DT
I eighth JJ
I quarter NN
O in IN
I a DT
I row NN
O of IN
I 20 CD
I <percent> NN
I or CC
I more RBR
I per-share JJ
I earnings NNS
I growth NN
O <period> <period>
O Spurred VBN
O by IN
I growth NN
O in IN
I world-wide JJ
I sales NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I prescription NN
I drugs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Warner-Lambert NNP
O said VBD
I 1989 CD
O will MD
O be VB
I the DT
I best JJS
I year NN
O in IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I history NN
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I per-share JJ
I earnings NNS
O expected VBN
O to TO
O increase VB
I more JJR
I than IN
I 20 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 6<period>10 CD
O <period> <period>
I Sales NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I quarter NN
O rose VBD
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>11 CD
I billion CD
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>03 CD
I billion CD
O <period> <period>
I Prescription-drug NN
I world-wide JJ
I sales NNS
O rose VBD
I 9 CD
I <percent> NN
O in IN
I the DT
I quarter NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 340 CD
I million CD
O <colon> =colon=
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I sales NNS
O rose VBD
I 15 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I segment NN
B <apost>s POS
I growth NN
O was VBD
O led VBN
O by IN
I sales NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I cardiovascular JJ
I drugs NNS
B Lopid NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I lipid NN
I regulator NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Dilzem NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I calcium NN
I channel NN
I blocker NN
O <period> <period>
I World-wide JJ
I sales NNS
O of IN
I Warner-Lambert NNP
B <apost>s POS
I non-prescription JJ
I health-care NN
I products NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O such JJ
O as IN
I Halls NNP
I cough NN
I tablets NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Rolaids NNP
I antacid NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Lubriderm NNP
I skin NN
I lotion NN
O <comma> <comma>
O increased VBN
I 3 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 362 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I the DT
I third JJ
I quarter NN
O <colon> =colon=
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I sales NNS
O rose VBD
I 5 NN
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I Confectionery JJ
I products NNS
I sales NNS
O also RB
O had VBD
I strong JJ
I growth NN
O in IN
I the DT
I quarter NN
O <period> <period>
I World-wide JJ
I sales NNS
O of IN
I Trident NNP
I gum NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Certs NNP
I breath NN
I mints NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Clorets NNP
I gum NN
I and CC
I breath NN
I mints NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O increased VBN
I 12 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 277 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I Warner-Lambert NNP
I shares NNS
O closed VBD
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 109<period>50 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O up IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>50 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I Big NNP
I Board NNP
I composite JJ
I trading NN
B yesterday NN
O <period> <period>
I Eli NNP
I Lilly NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co NNP
I <period> <period>
I Lilly NNP
O attributed VBD
I record NN
I third-quarter JJ
I and CC
I nine-month JJ
I results NNS
O to TO
I world-wide JJ
I gains NNS
O for IN
I pharmaceuticals NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I medical JJ
I instruments NNS
O and CC
I plant-science NN
I products NNS
O despite IN
I poor JJ
I exchange NN
I rates NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I dollar NN
B that WDT
O slowed VBD
I sales NNS
O abroad RB
O <period> <period>
I Earnings NNS
O continued VBD
O to TO
O pace VB
I sales NNS
O because IN
O of IN
I a DT
I lower JJR
I tax NN
I rate NN
O <comma> <comma>
I profit NN
O from IN
I the DT
I renegotiation NN
O of IN
I the DT
I debt NN
I instrument NN
O received VBD
O from IN
I Faberge NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O in IN
I connection NN
O with IN
I Lilly NNP
B <apost>s POS
I sale NN
O of IN
I Elizabeth NNP
I Arden NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O in IN
I 1987 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I net JJ
I proceeds NNS
O from IN
I the DT
I settlement NN
O of IN
I patent NN
I litigation NN
O at IN
I Lilly NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Hybritech NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
I unit NN
O <period> <period>
I Third-quarter JJ
I sales NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I Indianapolis NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Ind<period> NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I company NN
O rose VBD
I 11 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>045 CD
I billion CD
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 940<period>6 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I Nine-month JJ
I sales NNS
O grew VBD
I 12 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 3<period>39 CD
I billion CD
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 3<period>03 CD
I billion CD
B a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
I Sales NNS
O of IN
I Prozac NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I anti-depressant NN
O <comma> <comma>
O led VBN
I drug-sales NNS
I increases NNS
O <period> <period>
I Higher JJR
I sales NNS
O of IN
I pesticides NNS
O and CC
I other JJ
I plant-science NN
I products NNS
O more JJR
O than IN
O offset VB
I a DT
I slight JJ
I decline NN
O in IN
I the DT
I sales NNS
O of IN
I animal-health NN
I products NNS
O to TO
O fuel VB
I the DT
I increase NN
O in IN
I world-wide JJ
I agricultural JJ
I product NN
I sales NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Lilly NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Advanced NNP
I Cardiovascular NNP
I Systems NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O and CC
I Cardiac NNP
I Pacemakers NNPS
I Inc<period> NNP
I units NNS
O led VBD
I growth NN
O in IN
I the DT
I medical-instrument JJ
I systems NNS
I division NN
O <period> <period>
I Lilly NNP
I shares NNS
O closed VBD
I yesterday NN
O in IN
I composite JJ
I trading NN
O on IN
I the DT
I Big NNP
I Board NNP
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 62<period>25 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O down RB
I 12<period>5 CD
I cents NNS
O <period> <period>
I Reuben NNP
I Mark NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I chairman NN
O of IN
I Colgate-Palmolive NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I he PRP
O is VBZ
O <quote> <quote>
O comfortable JJ
O <quote> <quote>
O with IN
I analysts NNS
B <apost> POS
I estimates NNS
O that IN
I third-quarter JJ
I earnings NNS
O rose VBD
O to TO
I between IN
I 95 CD
I cents NNS
I and CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>05 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <period> <period>
I That DT
O compares VBZ
O with IN
I per-share JJ
I earnings NNS
O from IN
I continuing VBG
I operations NNS
O of IN
I 69 CD
I cents NNS
B the DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <colon> =colon=
O including VBG
I discontinued VBN
I operations NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I per-share NN
O was VBD
I 88 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I year NN
O ago RB
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I per-share JJ
I estimates NNS
O mean VBP
I the DT
I consumer-products NNS
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I net JJ
I income NN
O <comma> <comma>
O increased VBN
O to TO
I between IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 69<period>5 CD
I million CD
I and CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 76 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 47<period>1 CD
I million CD
B the DT
I year-before JJ
I period NN
O <period> <period>
I Analysts NNS
O estimate VBP
I Colgate NNP
B <apost>s POS
I world-wide JJ
I third-quarter JJ
I sales NNS
O rose VBD
I about IN
I 8 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>29 CD
I billion CD
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Mark NNP
O attributed VBD
I the DT
I earnings NNS
I growth NN
O to TO
I strong JJ
I sales NNS
O in IN
I Latin NNP
I America NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Asia NNP
O and CC
I Europe NNP
O <period> <period>
I Results NNS
O were VBD
O also RB
O bolstered VBN
O by IN
I <quote> <quote>
I a DT
I very RB
I meaningful JJ
I <quote> <quote>
I increase NN
O in IN
I operating VBG
I profit NN
O by IN
I Colgate NNP
B <apost>s POS
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I business NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Mark NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Operating NN
I profit NN
O at IN
I Colgate NNP
B <apost>s POS
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I household NN
I products NNS
I and CC
I personal-care JJ
I businesses NNS
O jumped VBD
I 25 CD
I <percent> NN
O in IN
I the DT
I quarter NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Mark NNP
O added VBD
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O said VBD
I the DT
I improvement NN
O was VBD
I a DT
I result NN
O of IN
I cost NN
I savings NNS
O achieved VBN
O by IN
O consolidating VBG
O manufacturing NN
I operations NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O blending VBG
I two CD
I sales NNS
I organizations NNS
O and CC
O focusing VBG
O more RBR
O carefully RB
I the DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I promotional JJ
I activities NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I estimated VBN
I improvement NN
O in IN
I Colgate NNP
B <apost>s POS
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I operations NNS
O took VBD
I some DT
I analysts NNS
O by IN
I surprise NN
O <period> <period>
I Colgate NNP
B <apost>s POS
I household NN
I products NNS
I business NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O includes VBZ
I such JJ
I brands NNS
O as IN
I Fab NNP
I laundry NN
I detergent NN
O and CC
I Ajax NNP
I cleanser NN
O <comma> <comma>
O has VBZ
O been VBN
I a DT
I weak JJ
I performer NN
O <period> <period>
I Analysts NNS
O estimate VBP
I Colgate NNP
B <apost>s POS
I sales NNS
O of IN
I household NN
I products NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O were VBD
O flat JJ
O for IN
I the DT
I quarter NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I they PRP
O estimated VBD
I operating VBG
I margins NNS
O at IN
I only RB
I 1 CD
I <percent> NN
I to TO
I 3 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O If IN
I you PRP
O could MD
O say VB
I their PRP<dollar>
I business NN
O in IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O was VBD
O mediocre JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O great JJ
O everywhere RB
O else RB
O <comma> <comma>
I that WDT
O would MD
O be VB
O fine JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Bonita NNP
I Austin NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I analyst NN
O with IN
I Wertheim NNP
I Schroder NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O But CC
I it PRP
O <apost>s VBZ
O not RB
O mediocre JJ
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O <apost>s VBZ
I a DT
I real JJ
I problem NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Mark NNP
O conceded VBD
O that IN
I Colgate NNP
B <apost>s POS
I domestic JJ
I business NN
O <comma> <comma>
O apart RB
O from IN
O its PRP<dollar>
O highly RB
O profitable JJ
I Hill NNP
I <apost>s POS
O Pet NNP
O Products NNPS
O unit NN
O <comma> <comma>
O has VBZ
O lagged VBN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O <apost>ve VBP
O done VBN
I a DT
I lot NN
O to TO
O improve VB
I <lparen> <lparen>
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I <period> <period>
I <rparen> <rparen>
I results NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I a DT
I lot NN
I more JJR
O will MD
O be VB
O done VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Mark NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Improving VBG
I profitability NN
O of IN
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I operations NNS
O is VBZ
I an DT
I extremely RB
I high JJ
I priority NN
O in IN
I the DT
I company NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O To TO
O focus VB
O on IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I global JJ
I consumer-products NNS
I business NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Colgate NNP
O sold VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I Kendall NNP
I health-care NN
I business NN
O in IN
I 1988 CD
O <period> <period>
I H<period> NNP
I Anthony NNP
I Ittleson NNP
O was VBD
O elected VBN
I a DT
I director NN
O of IN
I this DT
I company NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O primarily RB
O has VBZ
I interests NNS
O in IN
I radio NN
I and CC
I television NN
I stations NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O increasing VBG
I the DT
I number NN
O of IN
I seats NNS
O to TO
I five CD
O <period> <period>
I Osborn NNP
O also RB
O operates VBZ
I Muzak NNP
I franchises NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I entertainment NN
I properties NNS
O and CC
I small JJ
I cable-television NN
I systems NNS
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Ittleson NNP
O is VBZ
I executive NN
O <comma> <comma>
I special JJ
I projects NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O at IN
I CIT NNP
I Group NNP
I Holdings NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O is VBZ
O controlled VBN
O by IN
I Manufacturers NNP
I Hanover NNP
I Corp NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Boston NNP
I Globe NNP
O says VBZ
I its PRP<dollar>
I newly RB
I redesigned VBN
I pages NNS
O have VBP
I a DT
I <quote> <quote>
I crisper NN
I <quote> <quote>
I look VB
O with IN
I revamped VBN
I fixtures NNS
O aimed VBN
O at IN
O making VBG
I the DT
I paper NN
O <quote> <quote>
O more RBR
O consistent JJ
O <quote> <quote>
O and CC
O <quote> <quote>
O easier JJR
O to TO
O read VB
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Maybe RB
O so RB
O -- =colon=
O if IN
I you PRP
O can MD
O find VB
O where WRB
I your PRP<dollar>
I favorite JJ
I writer NN
O went VBD
O <period> <period>
I Beantown NNP
I scribes NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O spare VB
I no DT
I invective NN
O when WRB
O taking VBG
O on IN
I local JJ
I luminaries NNS
O such JJ
O as IN
I Michael NNP
I <quote> <quote>
I Pee NNP
I Wee NNP
I <quote> <quote>
I Dukakis NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I New NNP
I England NNP
I Patriots NNPS
I Coach NNP
I Raymond NNP
I <quote> <quote>
I Rev<period> NNP
I Ray NNP
I <quote> <quote>
I Berry NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I yesterday NN
O poured VBD
I ridicule NN
O on IN
I new JJ
I drawings NNS
O of IN
I Globe NNP
I columnists NNS
B that WDT
O replaced VBD
I old JJ
I photos NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I revamped VBN
I pages NNS
B this DT
I week NN
O <period> <period>
O By IN
I late JJ
I last JJ
I night NN
O <comma> <comma>
O Globe NNP
O Managing NNP
O Editor NNP
I Thomas NNP
I Mulvoy NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O bending VBG
O to TO
I the DT
I will MD
O of IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I troops NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O scrapped VBD
I the DT
I new JJ
I drawings NNS
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I a DT
I few JJ
I days NNS
O at IN
O least JJS
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O says VBZ
O <comma> <comma>
I no DT
I pictures NNS
I or CC
I drawings NNS
O of IN
I any DT
I kind NN
O will MD
O adorn VB
I the DT
I columns NNS
O <period> <period>
I Trouble NN
O was VBD
O <comma> <comma>
I nobody NN
O thought VBD
I they PRP
O looked VBD
O right NN
O <period> <period>
I Globe NNP
I columnist NN
I Mike NNP
I Barnicle NNP
O -- =colon=
O in IN
I the DT
I second JJ
I attack NN
O on IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I employer NN
O in IN
I as IN
I many JJ
I weeks NNS
O -- =colon=
O averred VBD
O that IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I shadowy JJ
I countenance NN
O was VBD
O so RB
O bad JJ
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O looked VBD
O <quote> <quote>
O like IN
I a DT
I face NN
B you PRP
O <apost>d MD
O find VB
O on IN
I a DT
I bottle NN
O of IN
I miracle NN
I elixir NN
B that WDT
O promises VBZ
O to TO
O do VB
O away RB
O with IN
I diarrhea NN
O in IN
I our PRP<dollar>
I lifetime NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Barnicle NNP
O reminded VBD
I readers NNS
O that IN
I he PRP
O still RB
O has VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O forgiven VBN
I Globe NNP
I management NN
O for IN
O questioning VBG
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 20 CD
I expense NN
I chit NN
B he PRP
O submitted VBD
O for IN
O parking VBG
I his PRP<dollar>
I car NN
O while IN
O chasing VBG
I a DT
I story NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O thought VBD
O <lparen> <lparen>
I the DT
I drawing VBG
O <rparen> <rparen>
I a DT
I cross NN
O between IN
I someone NN
B you PRP
O <apost>d MD
O spot VB
O whipping VBG
O open JJ
I his PRP<dollar>
I trench NN
I coat NN
O <period><period><period> =colon=
O or CC
I a DT
I guy NN
B who WP
O boasted VBD
I he PRP
O <apost>d MD
O been VBN
I Charles NNP
I Manson NNP
B <apost>s POS
I roommate NN
O for IN
I the DT
I last JJ
I 19 CD
I years NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Barnicle NNP
O was VBD
O hardly RB
O kinder JJR
O to TO
I the DT
I renderings NNS
O of IN
I colleagues NNS
B Michael NNP
I Madden NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
O <quote> <quote>
O appears VBZ
O to TO
O be VB
I a DT
I pervert NN
O <quote> <quote>
O <rparen> <rparen>
O <comma> <comma>
I Will MD
I McDonough NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
O <quote> <quote>
O looks VBZ
O as IN
O if IN
I he PRP
O drove VBD
O for IN
I Abe NNP
I Lincoln NNP
O <quote> <quote>
O <rparen> <rparen>
O or CC
I Bella NNP
I English NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I whose WP<dollar>
I <quote> <quote>
I little JJ
I girl NN
O now RB
O screams VBZ
O hysterically RB
I every DT
I time NN
B she PRP
O sees VBZ
I a DT
I newspaper NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Lynn NNP
I Staley NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Globe NNP
B <apost>s POS
I assistant NN
I managing VBG
I editor NN
O for IN
I design NN
O <comma> <comma>
O acknowledges VBZ
O that IN
I the DT
I visages NNS
O were VBD
O <quote> <quote>
O on IN
I the DT
I low JJ
I end NN
O of IN
I the DT
I likeness NN
I spectrum NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Rival NNP
I Boston NNP
I Herald NNP
I columnist NN
I Howie NNP
I Carr NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O usually RB
O rails VBZ
O at IN
I Statehouse NN
I <quote> <quote>
I hacks NNS
I <quote> <quote>
I and CC
I nepotism NN
O <comma> <comma>
O argued VBD
O that IN
I the DT
I new JJ
I drawings NNS
O were VBD
O designed VBN
O to TO
O hide VB
I Mr<period> NNP
I Madden NNP
B <apost>s POS
I <quote> <quote>
I rapidly RB
I growing VBG
I forehead NN
I <quote> <quote>
O and CC
I the DT
I facial JJ
I defects NNS
O of IN
I <quote> <quote>
I chinless JJ
I <quote> <quote>
I Dan NNP
I Shaughnessy NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Globe NNP
I sports NNS
I columnist NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O But CC
O think VBP
O of IN
I the DT
I money NN
B you PRP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I reader NN
O <comma> <comma>
O will MD
O save VB
O on IN
I Halloween NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Barnicle NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Instead RB
O of IN
O buying VBG
I masks NNS
O for IN
I your PRP<dollar>
I kids NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O just RB
O cut VB
O out RP
I the IN
I columnists NNS
B <apost> POS
I pictures NNS
O <period><period><period> =colon=
O <period> <period>
O Deeply RB
O ingrained JJ
O in IN
O both DT
I the DT
I book NN
I review NN
I <quote> <quote>
O Kissing VBG
I Nature NNP
B Good-bye UH
O <quote> <quote>
O by IN
I Stephen NNP
I MacDonald NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I Leisure NNP
I <amp> CC
I Arts NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Sept<period> NNP
I 27 CD
O <rparen> <rparen>
O and CC
I the DT
I books NNS
O reviewed VBN
O is VBZ
I the DT
I assumption NN
O that IN
I global JJ
I warming NN
O is VBZ
O entirely RB
I a DT
I result NN
O of IN
I human JJ
I activity NN
O <period> <period>
O Is VBZ
I such JJ
I a DT
I view NN
O justified VBN
O ? <period>
O In IN
I the DT
I absence NN
O of IN
I humans NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O would MD
I the DT
I Earth NNP
O enjoy VB
I a DT
I constant JJ
I climate NN
O over IN
I the DT
I long JJ
I term NN
O ? <period>
O Clearly RB
O not RB
O <period> <period>
I About IN
I 20<comma>000 CD
I years NNS
O ago RB
I the DT
I last JJ
I ice NN
I age NN
O ended VBD
O <period> <period>
I Enormous JJ
I ice NN
I sheets NNS
O retreated VBD
O from IN
I the DT
I face NN
O of IN
I North NNP
I America NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I northern JJ
I Europe NNP
O and CC
I Asia NNP
O <period> <period>
I This DT
I global JJ
I warming NN
O must MD
O have VB
O been VBN
O entirely RB
O natural JJ
O -- =colon=
I nobody NN
O would MD
O blame VB
I it PRP
O on IN
I a DT
I few JJ
I hundred CD
I thousand CD
I hunter-gatherers NNS
O hunting NN
I mammoths NNS
O and CC
O scratching VBG
O around IN
O in IN
I caves NNS
O <period> <period>
O Furthermore RB
O <comma> <comma>
I no DT
I bell NN
O has VBZ
O yet RB
O rung VBN
O to TO
O announce VB
I the DT
I end NN
O of IN
I this DT
I immense JJ
I episode NN
O of IN
I natural JJ
I global JJ
I warming NN
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O is VBZ
O probably RB
O continuing VBG
O and CC
O may MD
O well RB
O account VB
O for IN
I most RBS
O of IN
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I all DT
O of IN
O <comma> <comma>
I present-day JJ
I global JJ
I warming NN
O <period> <period>
I I PRP
O bow VBP
O to TO
I no DT
I one CD
O in IN
I my PRP<dollar>
I regard NN
O for IN
I our PRP<dollar>
I terrestrial JJ
I heritage NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O if IN
I we PRP
O are VBP
O serious JJ
O about IN
I global JJ
I warming NN
B we PRP
O must MD
O look VB
O at IN
I the DT
I big JJ
I picture NN
O and CC
O not RB
O allow VB
I the DT
I Dominant NNP
I Culture NNP
O to TO
O lock VB
I us PRP
O into IN
I the DT
I capitalist-exploiters-greedy-American-consumers-global JJ
I - =colon=
I warming NN
I scenario NN
O as IN
I the DT
I sole JJ
I model NN
O for IN
I discussion NN
O <period> <period>
I Jocelyn NNP
I Tomkin NNP
B Astronomy NNP
I Department NNP
B University NNP
O of IN
I The DT
I Internal NNP
I Revenue NNP
I Service NNP
O plans VBZ
O to TO
O restructure VB
I itself PRP
O more JJR
O like IN
I a DT
I private JJ
I corporation NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I addition NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I tax-collecting JJ
I agency NN
O says VBZ
O that IN
I it PRP
O will MD
O take VB
I the DT
I unusual JJ
I step NN
O of IN
O looking VBG
O to TO
I the DT
I private JJ
I sector NN
O to TO
O fill VB
I two CD
I new JJ
I high-level JJ
I positions NNS
O to TO
O guide VB
I the DT
I 120<comma>000-employee JJ
I agency NN
O =colon= =colon=
I a DT
I comptroller NN
O to TO
O oversee VB
I daily JJ
I finances NNS
O and CC
I a DT
I chief JJ
I information NN
I officer NN
O to TO
O update VB
I the DT
I information NN
I system NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O includes VBZ
I probably RB
I the DT
I largest JJS
I computer NN
I data NNS
I base VBP
O in IN
I the DT
I world NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I IRS NNP
O also RB
O said VBD
O that IN
I it PRP
O would MD
O create VB
I the DT
I position NN
O of IN
I chief JJ
I financial JJ
I officer NN
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O will MD
O be VB
O hired VBN
O from IN
O within IN
I the DT
I agency NN
O <period> <period>
I IRS NNP
I Commissioner NNP
I Fred NNP
I T<period> NNP
I Goldberg NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I changes NNS
O are VBP
O intended VBN
O to TO
O bring VB
O <quote> <quote>
I accountability NN
O <quote> <quote>
O to TO
I the DT
I agency NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O has VBZ
I an DT
I annual JJ
I budget NN
O of IN
I more JJR
I than IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 5 NN
I billion CD
O and CC
O collects VBZ
I about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1 CD
I trillion CD
B a DT
I year NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I My PRP<dollar>
I assessment NN
O and CC
I everyone NN
B <apost>s POS
I assessment NN
O is VBZ
O that IN
I we PRP
O do VBP
O not RB
O have VB
I the DT
I kinds NNS
O of IN
I information NN
B that WDT
O let VBP
I us PRP
O responsibly RB
O and CC
O effectively RB
O formulate VB
O and CC
O execute VB
I our PRP<dollar>
I budget NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Goldberg NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O And CC
I we PRP
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O have VB
I internal JJ
I controls NNS
I and CC
I discipline NN
B that IN
B we PRP
O need VBP
O to TO
O have VB
O to TO
O spend VB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 5 NN
I billion CD
O properly RB
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Goldberg NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O took VBD
O over IN
O as IN
I head NN
O of IN
I the DT
I IRS NNP
O in IN
I July NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O disturbed VBN
O by IN
I what WP
B he PRP
O considers VBZ
I the DT
I inefficiency NN
I <comma> <comma>
I waste NN
I and CC
I lack NN
O of IN
I coordination NN
O among IN
I the DT
I branches NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I vast JJ
I federal JJ
I agency NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I IRS NNP
O operates VBZ
O on IN
I a DT
I computer NN
I system NN
O designed VBN
O in IN
I 1961 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
B it PRP
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O trying VBG
O to TO
O modernize VB
O for IN
I years NNS
O <period> <period>
O And CC
I the DT
I agency NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O operated VBD
O throughout IN
I fiscal JJ
I 1989 CD
O with IN
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 360 CD
I million CD
I budget NN
I shortfall NN
O <comma> <comma>
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O under IN
I a DT
I hiring VBG
I freeze NN
O since IN
I last JJ
I fall NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I new JJ
I commissioner NN
O says VBZ
O that IN
I closer JJR
I scrutiny NN
O of IN
O how WRB
I the DT
I agency NN
O uses VBZ
I its PRP<dollar>
I resources NNS
O will MD
O go VB
I a DT
I long JJ
I way NN
O toward IN
O enhancing VBG
I its PRP<dollar>
I ability NN
O to TO
O collect VB
I more JJR
I tax NN
I revenue NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O think VBP
O that IN
I you PRP
O will MD
O see VB
I a DT
I significant JJ
I improvement NN
O in IN
I the DT
I budget NN
I formulation NN
I and CC
I execution NN
I process NN
B which WDT
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I turn NN
O <comma> <comma>
I I PRP
O believe VBP
O will MD
O result VB
O in IN
I a DT
I significant JJ
I increase NN
O in IN
I revenue NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I IRS NNP
O hopes VBZ
O to TO
O fill VB
I the DT
I new JJ
I positions NNS
O soon RB
O <period> <period>
O Customarily RB
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O would MD
O appoint VB
I career NN
I civil JJ
I servants NNS
O from IN
O within IN
I the DT
I agency NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I Mr<period> NNP
I Goldberg NNP
O said VBD
I he PRP
O plans VBZ
O to TO
O <quote> <quote>
O scour VBP
I the DT
I world NN
O <quote> <quote>
O for IN
I the DT
I chief JJ
I information NN
I officer NN
O and CC
I the DT
I comptroller NN
O <period> <period>
O Although IN
I the DT
I jobs NNS
O will MD
O probably RB
O pay VB
I between IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 70<comma>000 CD
I and CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 80<comma>000 CD
B a DT
I year NN
O <comma> <comma>
I IRS NNP
I officials NNS
O are VBP
O confident JJ
O that IN
I they PRP
O can MD
O attract VB
I top-notch JJ
I candidates NNS
O from IN
I the DT
I private JJ
I sector NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I You PRP
O <apost>re VBP
O telling VBG
I someone NN
B they PRP
O can MD
O spend VB
I the DT
I next JJ
I three CD
I or CC
I four CD
I or CC
I five CD
I or CC
I six CD
I years NNS
O of IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I life NN
O bringing VBG
O about IN
I the DT
I most RBS
I difficult JJ
I and CC
I costly JJ
I modernization NN
O of IN
I an DT
I information NN
I system NN
O on IN
I the DT
I civil JJ
I side NN
O ever RB
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Goldberg NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O On IN
I the DT
I comptroller NN
I side NN
O <comma> <comma>
I you PRP
O <apost>re VBP
O developing VBG
O and CC
O making VBG
O work NN
I financial JJ
I controls NNS
O governing VBG
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 6 CD
I billion CD
I budget NN
O <period> <period>
O When WRB
I Maj<period> NNP
I Moises NNP
I Giroldi NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I leader NN
O of IN
I the DT
I abortive JJ
I coup NN
O in IN
I Panama NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
O buried VBN
O <comma> <comma>
I his PRP<dollar>
I body NN
O bore VBD
I several JJ
I gunshot NN
I wounds NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I cracked VBN
I skull NN
O and CC
I broken VBN
I legs NNS
I and CC
I ribs NNS
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O were VBD
I the DT
I signature NN
O of IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I adversary NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Panamanian JJ
I leader NN
I Manuel NNP
I Antonio NNP
I Noriega NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I rebel NN
I officer NN
B <apost>s POS
I slow JJ
I and CC
I painful JJ
I death NN
O <comma> <comma>
O at IN
I the DT
I headquarters NN
O of IN
I Panama NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Battalion-2000 NN
I squad NN
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
O personally RB
O supervised VBN
O by IN
I Gen<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O says VBZ
I a DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I official NN
O with IN
I access NN
O to TO
I intelligence NN
I reports NNS
O <period> <period>
O Leaping VBG
O into IN
I rages VBZ
O <comma> <comma>
O sinking VBG
O into IN
I bouts NNS
O of IN
I drunkenness NN
I and CC
I mistrust NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O has VBZ
O put VBN
O to TO
I death NN
B some DT
I 70 CD
O of IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I troops NNS
O involved VBN
O in IN
I the DT
I coup NN
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I officials NNS
O monitoring NN
I crematoriums NNS
O and CC
I funeral NN
I parlors NNS
O in IN
I Panama NNP
I City NNP
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O is VBZ
O now RB
O changing VBG
I the DT
I place NN
B he PRP
O sleeps VBZ
I every DT
I night NN
O <comma> <comma>
I sometimes RB
I more JJR
I than IN
I once RB
B a DT
I night NN
O <period> <period>
I His PRP<dollar>
I meals NNS
O are VBP
O most RBS
O often RB
O prepared VBN
O by IN
I women NNS
B he PRP
O trusts VBZ
O -- =colon=
I his PRP<dollar>
I full-time JJ
I mistress NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Vicky NNP
I Amado NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I her PRP<dollar>
I mother NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Norma NNP
O <period> <period>
O And CC
I he PRP
O is VBZ
O collecting VBG
I the DT
I names NNS
O of IN
I those DT
B who WP
O telephoned VBD
I the DT
I coup-makers NNS
O to TO
O congratulate VB
I them PRP
O during IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I brief JJ
I time NN
O in IN
I control NN
O of IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I headquarters NN
O <period> <period>
I More JJR
I enemies NNS
O to TO
O be VB
O dealt VBN
O with RB
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I the DT
I two CD
I weeks NNS
O since IN
I the DT
I rebellion NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
B the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O hesitantly RB
O backed VBD
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O at IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I most RBS
I brutal JJ
I - =colon=
I and CC
I efficient JJ
I - =colon=
O in IN
O maintaining VBG
I power NN
O <period> <period>
O Yet RB
O <comma> <comma>
O while IN
I the DT
I failed VBN
I coup NN
O is VBZ
I a DT
I major JJ
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I foreign JJ
I policy NN
I embarrassment NN
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O is VBZ
I merely RB
I the DT
I latest JJS
I chapter NN
O in IN
I a DT
I byzantine JJ
I relationship NN
O between IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O and CC
I Washington NNP
B that IN
O stretches NNS
O back RB
I three CD
I decades NNS
O <period> <period>
I America NNP
B <apost>s POS
I war NN
O on IN
I the DT
I dictator NN
O over IN
I the DT
I past JJ
I two CD
I years NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O following VBG
I his PRP<dollar>
I indictment NN
O on IN
I drug NN
I charges NNS
O in IN
I February NNP
I 1988 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
I the DT
I legacy NN
O of IN
I that DT
I relationship NN
O <period> <period>
O Before IN
I American JJ
I foreign JJ
I policy NN
O set VBN
O out IN
O to TO
O destroy VB
I Noriega NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O helped VBD
O create VB
I him PRP
O out IN
O of IN
I the DT
I crucible NN
O of IN
I Panama NNP
B <apost>s POS
I long JJ
I history NN
O of IN
I conspirators NNS
I and CC
I pirates NNS
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I most RBS
I of IN
I the DT
I past JJ
I 30 CD
I years NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I marriage NN
O was VBD
I one CD
O of IN
I convenience NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I 1960 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O for IN
I example NN
O <comma> <comma>
O when WRB
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O was VBD
O both DT
I a DT
I cadet NN
O at IN
I an DT
I elite NN
I military JJ
I academy NN
O in IN
I Peru NNP
O and CC
I a DT
I spy-in-training NN
O for IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I Defense NNP
I Intelligence NNP
I Agency NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O was VBD
O detained VBN
O by IN
I Lima NNP
I authorities NNS
O for IN
O allegedly RB
O raping VBG
O and CC
O savagely RB
O beating VBG
I a DT
I prostitute NN
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I a DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I Embassy NNP
I cable NN
O from IN
I that DT
I period NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I woman NN
O had VBD
O nearly RB
O died VBN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I intelligence NN
O <comma> <comma>
O rather RB
O than IN
O rein NN
O in IN
O or CC
O cut NN
O loose JJ
I its PRP<dollar>
I new JJ
I spy NN
O <comma> <comma>
O merely RB
O filed VBN
I the DT
I report NN
O away RB
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
B <apost>s POS
I tips NNS
O on IN
I emerging VBG
I leftists NNS
O at IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I school NN
O were VBD
O deemed VBN
O more RBR
O important JJ
O to TO
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I interests NNS
O <period> <period>
O From IN
I that DT
I point NN
I on IN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O would MD
O make VB
I a DT
I practice NN
O of IN
O overlooking VBG
I the DT
I Panamanian NNP
B <apost>s POS
I misadventures NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O has VBZ
O befriended VBN
O and CC
O later RB
O turned VBD
O against IN
I many JJ
I dictators NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I none NN
O quite RB
O so RB
O resourceful JJ
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I 55-year-old NNP
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O is VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O as RB
O smooth JJ
O as IN
I the DT
I shah NN
O of IN
I Iran NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O as RB
O well-born JJ
O as IN
I Nicaragua NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Anastasio NNP
I Somoza NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O as RB
O imperial JJ
O as IN
I Ferdinand NNP
I Marcos NNP
O of IN
I the DT
I Philippines NNP
O or CC
O as RB
O bloody JJ
O as IN
I Haiti NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Baby NNP
I Doc NNP
I Duvalier NNP
O <period> <period>
O Yet RB
I he PRP
O has VBZ
O proved VBN
O more RBR
O resilient JJ
O than IN
I any DT
O of IN
I them PRP
O <period> <period>
O And CC
O out IN
O of IN
I necessity NN
O =colon= =colon=
I The DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O can MD
O make VB
I mistakes NNS
O and CC
O still JJ
O hope NN
O to TO
O remove VB
I him PRP
O from IN
I power NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I a DT
I single JJ
I error NN
O on IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I part NN
O could MD
O cost VB
I him PRP
B his PRP<dollar>
I life NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O underestimated VBD
I Noriega NNP
O all DT
O along IN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Ambler NNP
I Moss NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I former JJ
I Ambassador NNP
O to TO
I Panama NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I He PRP
O has VBZ
O mastered VBN
I the DT
I art NN
O of IN
I survival NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O In IN
O keeping VBG
O with IN
I America NNP
B <apost>s POS
I long JJ
I history NN
O of IN
O propping VBG
O up IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I recent JJ
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I actions NNS
O have VBP
O extended VBN
O rather RB
O than IN
O shortened VBN
I his PRP<dollar>
I survival NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O might MD
O have VB
O fallen VBN
O of IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I own JJ
I weight NN
O in IN
I 1988 CD
O because IN
O of IN
I Panama NNP
B <apost>s POS
I dire JJ
I economic JJ
I situation NN
O <comma> <comma>
O says VBZ
I Mr<period> NNP
I Moss NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I increasing VBG
I external JJ
I pressure NN
O has VBZ
O only RB
O given VBN
I him PRP
B additional JJ
I excuses NNS
O for IN
I repression NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I a DT
I scapegoat NN
O for IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I own JJ
I mismanagement NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O If IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O had VBD
O sat VBN
O back RB
O and CC
O done VBN
I nothing NN
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O might MD
O not RB
O have VB
O made VBN
I it PRP
O through IN
I 1988 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Moss NNP
O contends VBZ
O <period> <period>
O Perhaps RB
O most RBS
O important JJ
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
B <apost>s POS
I allies NNS
O have VBP
O intervened VBN
O to TO
O encourage VB
O -- =colon=
O in IN
I some DT
I cases NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
O demand VB
O -- =colon=
O that IN
I the DT
I dictator NN
O maintain VB
I his PRP<dollar>
I grip NN
O of IN
I the DT
I throne NN
O <period> <period>
I One CD
I Colombian JJ
I drug NN
I boss NN
O <comma> <comma>
O upon IN
O hearing NN
O in IN
I 1987 CD
O that IN
I Gen<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O was VBD
O negotiating VBG
O with IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O to TO
O abandon VB
I his PRP<dollar>
I command NN
O for IN
I a DT
I comfortable JJ
I exile NN
O <comma> <comma>
O sent VBD
I him PRP
B a DT
I hand-sized JJ
I mahogany NN
I coffin NN
O engraved VBN
O with IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I name NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I He PRP
O is VBZ
O cornered VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I the DT
I Rev<period> NNP
I Fernando NNP
I Guardia NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O has VBZ
O led VBN
I Catholic NNP
I Church NNP
I opposition NN
O against IN
I Noriega NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I Americans NNPS
O have VBP
O left VBN
I him PRP
O without IN
I a DT
I way NN
I out RB
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O is VBZ
O easy JJ
O to TO
O fight VB
O when WRB
I you PRP
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O have VB
I any DT
I other JJ
I option NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I His PRP<dollar>
I chief JJ
I advantage NN
O in IN
I the DT
I fight NN
O =colon= =colon=
I his PRP<dollar>
I intimate JJ
I knowledge NN
O of IN
I American JJ
I ways NNS
I and CC
I weaknesses NNS
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O often RB
O tells VBZ
I friends NNS
O that WDT
I patience NN
O is VBZ
I the DT
I best JJS
I weapon NN
O against IN
I the DT
I gringos NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O have VBP
I a DT
I short JJ
I attention NN
I span NN
O and CC
I little JJ
I stomach NN
O for IN
I lasting VBG
I confrontation NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O discovered VBD
I the DT
I young JJ
I Tony NNP
I Noriega NNP
O in IN
I late JJ
I 1959 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O when WRB
I he PRP
O was VBD
O in IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I second JJ
I year NN
O at IN
I the DT
I Chorrillos NNP
I Military NNP
I Academy NNP
O in IN
I Lima NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I former JJ
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I intelligence NN
I officials NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I contact NN
O occurred VBD
O through IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
B <apost>s POS
I half-brother NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Panamanian JJ
I diplomat NN
O based VBN
O in IN
I Peru NNP
O named VBD
I Luis NNP
I Carlos NNP
I Noriega NNP
I Hurtado NNP
O <period> <period>
I Luis NNP
I Carlos NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O knowing VBG
O that IN
O helping VBG
I the DT
I Americans NNPS
O could MD
O advance VB
I the DT
I career NN
O of IN
I any DT
I Panamanian JJ
I officer NN
O <comma> <comma>
O relayed VBD
I Tony NNP
B <apost>s POS
I reports NNS
O on IN
I the DT
I leftist JJ
I tendencies NNS
B he PRP
O observed VBD
O among IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I fellow NN
I students NNS
O and CC
O <comma> <comma>
O more RBR
O important JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O among IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I officers NNS
I and CC
I instructors NNS
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I spy NN
O was VBD
O born VBN
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O was VBD
I a DT
I heady JJ
I experience NN
O for IN
I the DT
I pockmarked JJ
I and CC
I slightly RB
I built VBN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O was VBD
O known VBN
O to TO
I his PRP<dollar>
I friends NNS
O as IN
I Cara NNP
I la FW
I Pina NNP
O -- =colon=
I pineapple NN
I face NN
O <period> <period>
O Born VBN
I the DT
I illegitimate JJ
I son NN
O of IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I father NN
B <apost>s POS
I maid NN
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O was VBD
O raised VBN
O on IN
I the DT
I mean NN
I streets NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I central JJ
I market NN
I district NN
O of IN
I Panama NNP
I City NNP
O <period> <period>
I Tony NNP
O was VBD
I four CD
I years NNS
O older JJR
O than IN
I most RBS
O of IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I fellow NN
I cadets NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O gained VBD
I admission NN
O to TO
I the DT
I academy NN
O because IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I brother NN
O had VBD
O falsified VBN
I his PRP<dollar>
I birth NN
I certificate NN
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O considered VBD
I himself PRP
O intellectually RB
O superior JJ
O to TO
I his PRP<dollar>
I Peruvian JJ
I peers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O many NN
O of IN
I whom WP
O were VBD
I wayward JJ
I sons NNS
O sent VBN
O by IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I well-off JJ
I families NNS
O to TO
I the DT
I highly RB
I disciplined VBN
I <comma> <comma>
I French-modeled JJ
I academy NN
O as IN
I a DT
I sort NN
O of IN
I reform NN
I school NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I peaked VBD
I military JJ
I cap NN
I and CC
I neatly RB
I pressed VBN
I <comma> <comma>
I French-made JJ
I uniform NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Noriega NNP
O felt VBD
O more RBR
O respected VBN
O and CC
O powerful JJ
O than IN
I ever RB
O in IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I underprivileged JJ
I life NN
O <comma> <comma>
I friends NNS
O from IN
I the DT
I period NN
O say VBP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I He PRP
O had VBD
I an DT
I elegant JJ
I uniform NN
O with IN
I gold NN
I buttons NNS
O in IN
I a DT
I country NN
O where WRB
I there EX
O was VBD
I a DT
I cult NN
O of IN
I militarism NN
O <comma> <comma>
O where WRB
I officers NNS
O were VBD
I the DT
I elite NN
O with IN
I special JJ
I privileges NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O recalls VBZ
I Darien NNP
I Ayala NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I fellow NN
I student NN
O in IN
I Peru NNP
O and CC
I a DT
I lifelong JJ
I friend NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
B <apost>s POS
I relationship NN
O to TO
I American JJ
I intelligence NN
I agencies NNS
O became VBD
O contractual JJ
O in IN
I either DT
I 1966 CD
I or CC
I 1967 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I intelligence NN
I officials NNS
O say VBP
O <period> <period>
I His PRP<dollar>
I commanding NN
I officer NN
O at IN
I the DT
I Chiriqui NNP
I Province NNP
I garrison NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Major NNP
I Omar NNP
I Torrijos NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O gave VBD
I him PRP
B an DT
I intriguing JJ
I assignment NN
O =colon= =colon=
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O would MD
O organize VB
I the DT
I province NN
B <apost>s POS
I first JJ
I intelligence NN
I service NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I spy NN
I network NN
O would MD
O serve VB
I two CD
I clients NNS
O =colon= =colon=
I the DT
I Panamanian JJ
I government NN
O <comma> <comma>
O by IN
O monitoring VBG
I political JJ
I opponents NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I region NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O by IN
O tracking VBG
I the DT
I growing VBG
I Communist NNP
I influence NN
O in IN
I the DT
I unions NNS
O organized VBN
O at IN
I United NNP
I Fruit NNP
I Co<period> NNP
B <apost>s POS
I banana NN
I plantations NNS
O in IN
I Bocas NNP
I del NNP
I Toros NNP
O and CC
I Puerto NNP
I Armuelles NNP
O <period> <period>
I United NNP
I Fruit NNP
O was VBD
I one CD
O of IN
I the DT
I two CD
I largest JJS
I contributors NNS
O to TO
I Panama NNP
B <apost>s POS
I national JJ
I income NN
O <period> <period>
O Satisfying VBG
I its PRP<dollar>
I interests NNS
O was VBD
I a DT
I priority NN
O for IN
I any DT
I Panamanian JJ
I leader NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
B <apost>s POS
I initial JJ
I retainer NN
O was VBD
I only RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 50 CD
I to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 100 CD
B a DT
I month NN
O <comma> <comma>
O plus CC
I occasional JJ
I gifts NNS
O of IN
I liquor NN
I or CC
I groceries NNS
O from IN
I the DT
I American NNP
I PX NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I former JJ
I intelligence NN
I official NN
O says NNS
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O was VBD
I modest JJ
I pay NN
O by IN
I American JJ
I standards NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I a DT
I healthy JJ
I boost NN
O to TO
I his PRP<dollar>
I small JJ
I military JJ
I salary NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
B fellow NN
I officers NNS
O remember VBP
O as IN
O having VBG
O been VBN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 300 CD
I to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 400 CD
O monthly JJ
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I He PRP
O did VBD
I it PRP
O very RB
O well RB
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O recalls VBZ
I Boris NNP
I Martinez NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I former JJ
I Panamanian JJ
I colonel NN
B who WP
O managed VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O and CC
I his PRP<dollar>
I operation NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I He PRP
O started VBD
O building VBG
I the DT
I files NNS
B that WDT
O helped VBD
I him PRP
O gain VBP
I power NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I A DT
I National NNP
I Guard NNP
I job NN
O assumed VBN
O by IN
I Capt<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O in IN
I 1964 CD
O -- =colon=
O as IN
I chief NN
O of IN
I the DT
I transit NN
I police NN
O in IN
I David NNP
I City NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I capital NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Chiriqui NNP
I Province NNP
O -- =colon=
O was VBD
O tailor-made JJ
O for IN
I an DT
I aspiring JJ
I super-spy NN
O <period> <period>
O By IN
O pressuring VBG
I taxi NN
I and CC
I bus NN
I drivers NNS
B who WP
O needed VBD
I licenses NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O gained VBD
I a DT
I ready JJ
I cache NN
O of IN
I information NN
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O knew VBD
I which WDT
I local JJ
I luminaries NNS
O had VBD
O been VBN
O caught VBN
O driving VBG
O drunk JJ
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O had VBD
O been VBN
O found VBN
O with IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I mistresses NNS
O <period> <period>
I This DT
O proved VBD
O particularly RB
O valuable JJ
O to TO
I the DT
I Panamanian JJ
I government NN
O in IN
I 1967 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O when WRB
I union NN
I leaders NNS
O were VBD
O planning VBG
I a DT
I May NNP
I Day NNP
I march NN
B that IN
B the DT
I government NN
O feared VBD
O could MD
O turn VB
O violent JJ
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O had VBD
O learned VBN
O that IN
I a DT
I local JJ
I union NN
I leader NN
O was VBD
O sleeping VBG
O with IN
I the DT
I wife NN
O of IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I deputy NN
O <period> <period>
O So RB
I he PRP
O splashed VBD
I the DT
I information NN
O on IN
I handbills NNS
B that IN
B he PRP
O distributed VBD
O throughout IN
I the DT
I banana-exporting JJ
I city NN
O of IN
I Puerto NNP
I Armuelles NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O was VBD
O ruled VBN
O by IN
I United NNP
I Fruit NNP
I Co NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I campaign NN
O so RB
O divided VBD
I union NN
I leaders NNS
O that IN
I the DT
I government NN
O found VBD
I them PRP
O far RB
O easier JJR
O to TO
O control VB
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I It PRP
O was VBD
O like IN
I a DT
I play NN
O on IN
I Broadway NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O recalls VBZ
I Mr<period> NNP
I Martinez NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Noriega NNP
O managed VBD
I the DT
I whole JJ
I thing NN
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O was VBD
O superb JJ
O <period> <period>
I Noriega NNP
O was VBD
I an DT
I expert NN
O at IN
O bribing VBG
O and CC
O blackmailing VBG
I people NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O During IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I years NNS
O in IN
I Chiriqui NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O however RB
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O also RB
O revealed VBD
I himself PRP
O as IN
I an DT
I officer NN
O as RB
O perverse JJ
O as IN
I he PRP
O was VBD
O ingenious JJ
O <period> <period>
I Rodrigo NNP
I Miranda NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I local JJ
I lawyer NN
I and CC
I human-rights JJ
I monitor NN
O <comma> <comma>
O recalls VBZ
I an DT
I intoxicated JJ
I Noriega NNP
O visiting VBG
I prisoners NNS
O in IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I cells NNS
O at IN
I the DT
I 5th NNP
I Zone NNP
I Garrison NNP
I headquarters NN
O in IN
I David NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O where WRB
I he PRP
O had VBD
I his PRP<dollar>
I offices NNS
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O would MD
O order VB
I them PRP
O all DT
O to TO
O take VB
O off IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I clothes NNS
O and CC
O run VB
O around IN
I the DT
I courtyard NN
O naked JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O laughing VBG
O at IN
I them PRP
O and CC
O then RB
O retreating VBG
O to TO
I his PRP<dollar>
I office NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I People NNS
O started VBD
O wondering VBG
O if IN
I something NN
O was VBD
O wrong JJ
O with IN
I him PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Miranda NNP
O recalls VBZ
O <period> <period>
O But CC
O through IN
I this DT
I period NN
O <comma> <comma>
O so RB
O far RB
O as IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I military NN
O was VBD
O concerned VBN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O was VBD
I a DT
I model NN
I recruit NN
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O signed VBD
O up IN
O for IN
I intelligence NN
I and CC
I counter-intelligence JJ
I training NN
O under IN
I American JJ
I officers NNS
O at IN
I Fort NNP
I Gulick NNP
O in IN
I Panama NNP
O in IN
I July NNP
I 1967 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I a DT
I copy NN
O of IN
I a DT
I 1983 CD
I resume NN
O with IN
I details NNS
B Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O has VBZ
O since IN
O classified VBN
O as IN
O secret NN
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O flew VBD
O to TO
I Fort NNP
I Bragg NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I N<period>C<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I September NNP
O of IN
I that DT
I year NN
O for IN
I a DT
I course NN
O in IN
I psychological JJ
I operations NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O returning VBG
O to TO
I the DT
I School NNP
O of IN
I the DT
I Americas NNP
O in IN
I Panama NNP
O for IN
I a DT
I two-month JJ
I course NN
O called VBN
O <quote> <quote>
I military JJ
I intelligence NN
O for IN
I officers NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Some DT
I American JJ
I officers NNS
O interpreted VBD
I his PRP<dollar>
I eagerness NN
I and CC
I studiousness NN
O as IN
I a DT
I sign NN
O of IN
I loyalty NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I they PRP
O did VBD
O so RB
O falsely RB
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O rose VBD
O to TO
I chief NN
O of IN
I intelligence NN
O in IN
I Panama NNP
B <apost>s POS
I socalled JJ
I G-2 NN
O in IN
I 1970 CD
O after IN
O providing VBG
O populist JJ
O dictator NN
I Torrijos NNP
B the DT
I critical JJ
I support NN
O to TO
O defeat VB
I a DT
I coup NN
I attempt NN
O against IN
I him PRP
B a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O became VBD
I Gen<period> NNP
I Torrijos NNP
B <apost>s POS
I inseparable JJ
I shadow NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I the DT
I holder NN
O of IN
I all DT
I Panama NNP
B <apost>s POS
I secrets NNS
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O by IN
I now RB
B a DT
I lieutenant NN
I colonel NN
O <comma> <comma>
O expanded VBD
I his PRP<dollar>
I contacts NNS
O to TO
O include VB
I the DT
I Cubans NNPS
O -- =colon=
O not RB
O to TO
O mention VB
I the DT
I Israelis NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Taiwanese JJ
O and CC
I any DT
I other JJ
I intelligence NN
I service NN
B that WDT
O came VBD
O knocking VBG
O <period> <period>
O When WRB
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I diplomats NNS
O complained VBD
O to TO
I the DT
I CIA NNP
O of IN
I Col<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
B <apost>s POS
I moonlighting NN
O <comma> <comma>
I intelligence NN
I experts NNS
O always RB
O insisted VBD
O that IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I allegiance NN
O was VBD
O first JJ
O to TO
I the DT
I Americans NNPS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Early RB
O on IN
O in IN
I the DT
I State NNP
I Department NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I we PRP
O took VBD
O to TO
O calling VBG
I him PRP
B the DT
I rent-a-colonel NN
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I tribute NN
O to TO
I his PRP<dollar>
I ability NN
O to TO
O simultaneously RB
O milk NN
I the DT
I antagonistic JJ
I intelligence NN
I services NNS
O of IN
I Cuba NNP
O and CC
I the DT
I United NNP
I States NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O recalls VBZ
I Francis NNP
I J<period> NNP
I McNeil NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
I deputy NN
I assistant NN
I secretary NN
O of IN
I state NN
O for IN
I inter-American JJ
I affairs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O first JJ
O ran VBD
O across IN
I reports NNS
O about IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O in IN
I 1977 CD
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Some DT
O of IN
I us PRP
O wondered VBD
O how WRB
I our PRP<dollar>
I intelligence NN
I people NNS
O could MD
O put VB
I so RB
I much JJ
I stock NN
O in IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I information NN
O when WRB
I he PRP
O was VBD
O just RB
O as IN
O close RB
O to TO
I the DT
I Cubans NNPS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Even RB
O at IN
I this DT
I early JJ
I stage NN
O <comma> <comma>
I drugs NNS
O caused VBD
I additional JJ
I concerns NNS
O <period> <period>
O During IN
I the DT
I Nixon NNP
I administration NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Drug NNP
I Enforcement NNP
I Administration NNP
O became VBD
O dismayed VBN
O at IN
I the DT
I extent NN
O of IN
I the DT
I G-2 NN
B <apost>s POS
I connections NNS
O to TO
I arrested VBN
I drug NN
I traffickers NNS
O <period> <period>
I One CD
I DEA NNP
I agent NN
O drew VBD
O up IN
I a DT
I list NN
O of IN
I five CD
I options NNS
O for IN
O dealing VBG
O with IN
I Col<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O one CD
O of IN
I which WDT
O was VBD
I assassination NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I head NN
O of IN
I the DT
I DEA NNP
O at IN
I the DT
I time NN
O <comma> <comma>
I John NNP
I Ingersoll NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O scotched VBD
I the DT
I assassination NN
I plan NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I he PRP
O did VBD
O fly VB
O to TO
I Panama NNP
O to TO
O scold VB
I dictator NN
I Torrijos NNP
O on IN
I the DT
I drug NN
I ties NNS
O of IN
I Panamanian JJ
I officials NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O including VBG
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Ingersoll NNP
O later RB
O recalled VBD
O that IN
I Gen<period> NNP
I Torrijos NNP
O seemed VBD
O afraid JJ
O to TO
O act VB
O on IN
I the DT
I concerns NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Everybody NN
O was VBD
O afraid JJ
O of IN
I him PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Ingersoll NNP
O says VBZ
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O became VBD
I an DT
I even RB
I greater JJR
I threat NN
O in IN
I 1976 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O when WRB
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I intelligence NN
I services NNS
O discovered VBN
O that IN
I he PRP
O had VBD
O been VBN
O buying VBG
I recordings NNS
O of IN
I electronically RB
I monitored VBN
I conversations NNS
O from IN
I three CD
I sergeants NNS
O working VBG
O for IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I Army NNP
B <apost>s POS
I 470th NNP
I Military NNP
I Intelligence NNP
I Group NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I tapes NNS
O included VBD
I wiretaps NNS
O of IN
I Gen<period> NNP
I Torrijos NNP
B <apost>s POS
I own JJ
I phone NN
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I American JJ
I intelligence NN
I officials NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O caught VBD
I him PRP
O with IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I hands NNS
O on IN
I our PRP<dollar>
I cookie NN
I jar NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I former JJ
I CIA NNP
I Director NNP
I Stansfield NNP
I Turner NNP
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I the DT
I first JJ
I time NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O considered VBD
O cutting VBG
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O from IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I intelligence NN
I payroll NN
O -- =colon=
O and CC
I the DT
I deliberations NNS
O were VBD
O intense JJ
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Turner NNP
O says VBZ
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O In IN
I the DT
I world NN
O of IN
I intelligence NN
O <comma> <comma>
O if IN
I you PRP
O want VBP
O to TO
O get VB
I information NN
O <comma> <comma>
I you PRP
O get VBP
I it PRP
O from IN
I seedy JJ
I characters NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I question NN
O is VBZ
O how WRB
O much JJ
I you PRP
O get VBP
O tied VBN
O in IN
O with IN
I seedy JJ
I characters NNS
O so IN
I they PRP
O can MD
O extort VB
I you PRP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Intelligence NN
I officials NNS
O to TO
I this DT
I day NN
O worry NN
O whether IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O sold VBD
I sensitive JJ
I information NN
O on IN
I the DT
I recordings NNS
O to TO
I the DT
I Cubans NNPS
O or CC
I others NNS
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Turner NNP
O was VBD
O troubled JJ
O enough RB
O to TO
O cancel VB
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I contract NN
O with IN
I the DT
I rent-a-colonel NN
O at IN
I the DT
I beginning NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Carter NNP
I administration NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O soon RB
O found VBD
I new JJ
I cause NN
O for IN
I concern NN
O =colon= =colon=
I gun-running JJ
O <period> <period>
I Prosecutors NNS
O in IN
I Southern NNP
I Florida NNP
O indicted VBD
I five CD
I Panamanians NNS
O on IN
I charges NNS
O of IN
O illegally RB
O running VBG
I arms NNS
O to TO
I Sandinista NNP
I rebels NNS
O trying VBG
O to TO
O overthrow VB
I the DT
I Nicaraguan JJ
I government NN
O of IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Somoza NNP
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O included VBD
I one CD
O of IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
B <apost>s POS
I closest JJS
I friends NNS
I and CC
I business NN
I partners NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Carlos NNP
I Wittgreen NNP
O <period> <period>
O And CC
I the DT
I investigators NNS
O were VBD
O quickly RB
O closing VBG
O in IN
O on IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
B himself PRP
O <period> <period>
O At IN
I the DT
I time NN
O <comma> <comma>
O though RB
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I 1979 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O was VBD
O once RB
O again RB
O flirting VBG
O with IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I longtime JJ
I Latin NNP
I American JJ
I spy NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O made VBD
I plans NNS
O to TO
O fly VB
O to TO
I Washington NNP
O for IN
I a DT
I meeting NN
O with IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I counterpart NN
O at IN
I the DT
I Pentagon NNP
O <period> <period>
I Dade NNP
I County NNP
I and CC
I federal JJ
I authorities NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O learning VBG
O that IN
I he PRP
O intended VBD
O to TO
O fly VB
O through IN
I Miami NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O made VBN
I plans NNS
O to TO
O arrest VB
I him PRP
O on IN
I the DT
I gun-running JJ
I charges NNS
O as RB
O soon RB
O as IN
I he PRP
O hit VBD
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I soil NN
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O was VBD
I a DT
I Friday NNP
O in IN
I June NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Pentagon NNP
O foiled VBD
I the DT
I plan NN
O <period> <period>
O According VBG
O to TO
I military JJ
I officers NNS
O at IN
I the DT
I time NN
O <comma> <comma>
I word NN
O was VBD
O passed VBN
O to TO
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O by IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I American JJ
I hosts NNS
O that IN
I the DT
I police NN
O would MD
O be VB
O waiting VBG
O <period> <period>
O On IN
I Monday NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I officials NNS
O received VBD
I a DT
I routine NN
I <comma> <comma>
I unclassified JJ
I message NN
O from IN
I the DT
I military JJ
I group NN
I commander NN
O in IN
I Panama NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Due JJ
O to TO
I health NN
I reasons NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Lt<period> NNP
I Col<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O has VBZ
O elected VBN
O to TO
O postpone VB
I his PRP<dollar>
I visit NN
O to TO
I Washington NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I it PRP
O read VBP
O <period> <period>
I Prosecutors NNS
O in IN
I Miami NNP
O received VBD
I yet RB
I another DT
I setback NN
O <period> <period>
I Their PRP<dollar>
I original JJ
I indictment NN
O against IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Wittgreen NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I friend NN
O of IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I the DT
I other JJ
I four CD
O was VBD
O dismissed VBN
O on IN
I a DT
I technicality NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
O now RB
O <comma> <comma>
O along IN
O with IN
O reindicting VBG
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
B <apost>s POS
I pal NN
O <comma> <comma>
I they PRP
O intended VBD
O to TO
O charge VB
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
B himself PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O on IN
I allegations NNS
O that IN
I he PRP
O was VBD
O involved VBN
O in IN
I the DT
I illegal JJ
I trading NN
O of IN
I some DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I arms NNS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I January NNP
I 1980 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I Jerome NNP
I Sanford NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
I assistant NN
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I attorney NN
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
O summoned VBN
O to TO
I a DT
I meeting NN
O with IN
I a DT
I Federal NNP
I Bureau NNP
O of IN
I Investigation NNP
O agent NN
O assigned VBN
O to TO
I the DT
I Bureau NNP
O of IN
I Alcohol NN
I <comma> <comma>
I Tobacco NNP
I and CC
I Firearms NNP
O in IN
I Miami NNP
O <period> <period>
O Panamanian JJ
O dictator NN
I Torrijos NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O was VBD
O told VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O had VBD
O granted VBN
I the DT
I shah NN
O of IN
I Iran NNP
B asylum NN
O in IN
I Panama NNP
O as IN
I a DT
I favor NN
O to TO
I Washington NNP
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Sanford NNP
O was VBD
O told VBN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
B <apost>s POS
I friend NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Wittgreen NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O would MD
O be VB
O handling VBG
I the DT
I shah NN
B <apost>s POS
I security NN
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O would MD
O n<apost>t RB
O be VB
I a DT
I good JJ
I idea NN
O to TO
O indict VB
I him PRP
O -- =colon=
O much RB
O less JJR
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I prosecutor NN
O was VBD
O told VBN
O <period> <period>
O After IN
I prodding VBG
O from IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Sanford NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I Attorney NNP
I Jack NNP
I Eskenazi NNP
O pleaded VBD
O with IN
I Justice NNP
I Department NNP
I officials NNS
O in IN
I Washington NNP
O to TO
O let VB
I the DT
I indictment NN
O proceed VB
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Unfortunately RB
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Eskenazi NNP
O wrote VBD
O in IN
I a DT
I letter NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I those DT
O of IN
I us PRP
O in IN
I law NN
I enforcement NN
O in IN
I Miami NNP
O find NN
I ourselves PRP
O frequently RB
O attempting VBG
O to TO
O enforce VB
I the DT
I laws NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I United NNP
I States NNPS
O but CC
O simultaneously RB
O being VBG
O caught VBN
O between IN
I foreign JJ
I policy NN
I considerations NNS
O over IN
I which WDT
B we PRP
O have VBP
I no DT
I control NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I letter NN
O <comma> <comma>
O along IN
O with IN
I a DT
I detailed VBN
I prosecution NN
I memo NN
O <comma> <comma>
O sat VBD
O on IN
I the DT
I desks NNS
O of IN
I Justice NNP
I officials NNS
O for IN
I months NNS
O before IN
I the DT
I case NN
O died VBD
I a DT
I quiet JJ
I death NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O think VBP
O if IN
I we PRP
O had VBD
O been VBN
O allowed VBN
O to TO
O go VB
O ahead RB
O then RB
I we PRP
O would MD
O n<apost>t RB
O have VB
I the DT
I problems NNS
B we PRP
O have VBP
O now RB
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Sanford NNP
O says VBZ
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O If IN
I he PRP
O had VBD
O been VBN
O found VBN
O guilty JJ
O <comma> <comma>
I we PRP
O could MD
O have VB
O stopped VBN
I him PRP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O In IN
I August NNP
I 1983 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O took VBD
O over IN
O as IN
I General NNP
O and CC
I de-facto JJ
I dictator NN
O of IN
I Panama NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O having VBG
O maneuvered VBN
I his PRP<dollar>
I way NN
O to TO
I the DT
I top JJ
B only RB
I two CD
I years NNS
O after IN
I the DT
I mysterious JJ
I death NN
O in IN
I a DT
I plane NN
I crash NN
O of IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I old JJ
I boss NN
I Omar NNP
I Torrijos NNP
O <period> <period>
O Soon RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I military NN
O became VBD
I a DT
I veritable JJ
I mafia NN
O controlling VBG
I legal JJ
I and CC
I illegal JJ
I businesses NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Reagan NNP
I administration NN
O also RB
O put VB
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
B <apost>s POS
I G-2 NN
O back RB
O on IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I payroll NN
O <period> <period>
I Payments NNS
O averaged VBD
I nearly RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 200<comma>000 CD
B a DT
I year NN
O from IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I Defense NNP
I Intelligence NNP
I Agency NNP
O and CC
I the DT
I CIA NNP
O <period> <period>
O Although IN
O working VBG
O for IN
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I intelligence NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O was VBD
O hardly RB
O helping VBG
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O exclusively RB
O <period> <period>
O During IN
I the DT
I Reagan NNP
I years NNS
B he PRP
O expanded VBD
I his PRP<dollar>
I business NN
I and CC
I intelligence NN
I contacts NNS
O with IN
I the DT
I Cubans NNPS
O and CC
I the DT
I Sandinistas NNPS
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O allegedly RB
O entered VBD
O into IN
I Panama NNP
B <apost>s POS
I first JJ
I formal JJ
I business NN
I arrangement NN
O with IN
I Colombian JJ
I drug NN
I bosses NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I Floyd NNP
I Carlton NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I pilot NN
B who WP
O once RB
O worked VBD
O for IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O and CC
I who WP
O testified VBD
O before IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I grand JJ
I jury NN
O in IN
I Miami NNP
B that WDT
O would MD
O ultimately RB
O indict VB
I the DT
I Panamanian JJ
O on IN
I drug NN
I charges NNS
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O was VBD
O convinced VBN
I the DT
I Reagan NNP
I White NNP
I House NNP
O would MD
O n<apost>t RB
O act VB
O against IN
I him PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O recalls VBZ
I his PRP<dollar>
I close NN
I ally NN
B Jose NNP
I Blandon NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O because IN
I he PRP
O had VBD
I an DT
I insurance NN
I policy NN
O =colon= =colon=
I his PRP<dollar>
I involvement NN
O with IN
I the DT
I Contra NNP
I rebels NNS
O in IN
I Nicaragua NNP
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Blandon NNP
O says VBZ
I the DT
I general JJ
O allowed VBN
I the DT
I Contras NNPS
O to TO
O set VB
O up IN
I a DT
I secret JJ
I training NN
I center NN
O in IN
I Panama NNP
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O also RB
O conveyed VBD
I intelligence NN
O from IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I spy NN
I operation NN
O inside IN
I the DT
I Nicaraguan JJ
I capital NN
O of IN
I Managua NNP
O <period> <period>
O And CC
O on IN
I at IN
I least JJS
I one CD
I occasion NN
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I the DT
I spring NN
O of IN
I 1985 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O helped VBD
O arrange VB
I a DT
I sabotage NN
I attack NN
O on IN
I a DT
I Sandinista NNP
I arsenal NN
O in IN
I Nicaragua NNP
O <period> <period>
O Although IN
O <comma> <comma>
I his PRP<dollar>
I help NN
O for IN
I the DT
I Contra NNP
I cause NN
O was VBD
O limited JJ
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O was VBD
O enough RB
O to TO
O win VB
I him PRP
B important JJ
I protectors NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I Reagan NNP
I administration NN
O <comma> <comma>
O says VBZ
I Sen<period> NNP
I Patrick NNP
I Leahy NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Vermont NNP
I Democrat NNP
B who WP
O then RB
O served VBN
O on IN
I the DT
I Senate NNP
I Intelligence NNP
I Committee NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Noriega NNP
O played VBD
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I intelligence NN
I agencies NNS
O and CC
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I government NN
O like IN
I a DT
I violin NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O says VBZ
O <period> <period>
I An DT
I incident NN
O in IN
I 1984 CD
O suggested VBD
I one CD
I additional JJ
I means NNS
O by IN
I which WDT
B Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O might MD
O have VB
O maintained VBN
I such JJ
I influence NN
O with IN
I Washington NNP
O -- =colon=
O by IN
O compromising VBG
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I officials NNS
O <period> <period>
I Curtin NNP
I Windsor NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O then RB
I the DT
I ambassador NN
O to TO
I Costa NNP
I Rica NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O recalls VBZ
O being VBG
O invited VBN
O to TO
I Panama NNP
O by IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
B <apost>s POS
I brother NN
B Luis NNP
I Carlos NNP
O for IN
I a DT
I weekend NN
O of IN
I deep JJ
I sea NN
I fishing NN
O and CC
O <quote> <quote>
I quiet JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I serious JJ
I conversation NN
O <quote> <quote>
O on IN
I the DT
I Aswara NNP
I Peninsula NNP
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Windsor NNP
O notified VBD
I Everett NNP
I E<period> NNP
I Briggs NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I ambassador NN
O to TO
I Panama NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O of IN
I the DT
I invitation NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Briggs NNP
O screamed VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Windsor NNP
O recalls VBZ
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O says VBZ
I Mr<period> NNP
I Briggs NNP
O told VBD
I him PRP
B he PRP
O was VBD
O being VBG
O set VBN
O up IN
O for IN
I a DT
I <quote> <quote>
I honey NN
I trap NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O in IN
I which WDT
B Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O would MD
O try VB
O to TO
O involve VB
I him PRP
O in IN
I an DT
I orgy NN
O and CC
O then JJ
O record NN
I the DT
I event NN
O <quote> <quote>
O with IN
I sound NN
I and CC
I video NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Briggs NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O on IN
I vacation NN
O after IN
O resigning VBG
I his PRP<dollar>
I position NN
O at IN
I the DT
I National NNP
I Security NNP
I Council NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O could MD
O n<apost>t RB
O be VB
O reached VBN
O for IN
I comment NN
O <period> <period>
O As IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
B <apost>s POS
I political JJ
I troubles NNS
O grew VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O so RB
O did VBD
I his PRP<dollar>
I offers NNS
O of IN
I assistance NN
O to TO
I the DT
I Contras NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I apparent JJ
I attempt NN
O to TO
O curry VB
I more JJR
I favor NN
O in IN
I Washington NNP
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I instance NN
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O helped VBD
O steal VB
I the DT
I May NNP
I 1984 CD
I Panamanian JJ
I elections NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I ruling NN
I party NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I just RB
I one CD
I month NN
O later RB
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O also RB
O contributed VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 100<comma>000 CD
O to TO
I a DT
I Contra NNP
I leader NN
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I documents NNS
O released VBN
O for IN
I Oliver NNP
I North NNP
B <apost>s POS
I criminal JJ
I trial NN
O in IN
I Washington NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I D<period>C NNP
O <period> <period>
O Yet RB
O <comma> <comma>
I his PRP<dollar>
I political JJ
I setbacks NNS
O mounted VBN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O was VBD
O accused VBN
O of IN
O ordering VBG
O in IN
I 1985 CD
B the DT
I beheading NN
O of IN
I Hugo NNP
I Spadafora NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I his PRP<dollar>
I most RBS
I outspoken JJ
I political JJ
I opponent NN
O and CC
I the DT
I first JJ
I man NN
O to TO
O publicly RB
O finger NN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O on IN
I drug NN
I trafficking NN
I charges NNS
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O then RB
O ousted VBD
I President NNP
I Nicholas NNP
I Ardito NNP
I Barletta NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I former JJ
I World NNP
I Bank NNP
I official NN
O with IN
I close NN
I ties NNS
O to TO
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O after IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Barletta NNP
O tried VBD
O to TO
O create VB
I a DT
I commission NN
O to TO
O investigate VB
I the DT
I murder NN
O <period> <period>
O And CC
O <comma> <comma>
I all PDT
I the DT
I while NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Panama NNP
B <apost>s POS
I debt NN
I problems NNS
O continued VBD
O to TO
O grow VB
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O was VBD
O growing VBG
O desperate JJ
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I late JJ
I 1986 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O made VBD
I an DT
I offer NN
B he PRP
O thought VBD
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O could MD
O n<apost>t RB
O refuse VB
O <period> <period>
O As IN
O recounted VBN
O in IN
I a DT
I stipulation NN
B that WDT
O summarized VBD
I government NN
I documents NNS
O released VBN
O for IN
I the DT
I North NNP
I trial NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O offered VBD
O to TO
O assassinate VB
I the DT
I Sandinista NNP
I leadership NN
O in IN
I exchange NN
O <quote> <quote>
O for IN
I a DT
I promise NN
O to TO
O help VB
O clean JJ
O up IN
I Noriega NNP
B <apost>s POS
I image NN
O and CC
I a DT
I commitment NN
O to TO
O lift VB
I the DT
I <lparen> <lparen>
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I <period> <period>
I <rparen> <rparen>
I ban NN
O on IN
I military JJ
I sales NNS
O to TO
I the DT
I Panamanian NNP
I Defense NNP
I Forces NNPS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O <quote> <quote>
I North NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I the DT
I document NN
O went VBD
O on IN
O <comma> <comma>
O referring VBG
O to TO
I Oliver NNP
I North NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O has VBZ
O told VBN
I Noriega NNP
B <apost>s POS
I representative NN
O that IN
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I law NN
O forbade VBD
I such JJ
I actions NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I representative NN
O responded VBD
O that IN
I Noriega NNP
O had VBD
I numerous JJ
I assets NNS
O in IN
I place NN
O in IN
I Nicaragua NNP
O and CC
O could MD
O accomplish VB
I many JJ
I essential JJ
I things NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O just RB
O as IN
I Noriega NNP
O had VBD
O helped VBN
O <lparen> <lparen>
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O <period> <period>
O <rparen> <rparen>
I the DT
I previous JJ
I year NN
O in IN
O blowing VBG
O up IN
I a DT
I Sandinista NNP
I arsenal NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Col<period> NNP
I North NNP
O conveyed VBD
I the DT
I request NN
O to TO
I his PRP<dollar>
I superiors NNS
O and CC
O to TO
O Assistant NNP
O Secretary NNP
O of IN
I State NNP
O Elliot NNP
O Abrams NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O relayed VBD
I it PRP
O to TO
O Secretary NNP
O of IN
I State NNP
O George NNP
O Shultz NNP
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
B <apost>s POS
I proposal NN
O was VBD
O turned VBN
O down RB
O <period> <period>
O And CC
I Mr<period> NNP
I Shultz NNP
O curtly RB
O told VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Abrams NNP
O that IN
I the DT
I general NN
O should MD
O be VB
O told VBN
O that IN
I only RB
I he PRP
O could MD
O repair VB
I his PRP<dollar>
I tarnished VBN
I image NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I end NN
O of IN
I the DT
I marriage NN
O was VBD
O at IN
I hand NN
O <period> <period>
O Within IN
I weeks NNS
B the DT
I unfolding VBG
I Iran-Contra NNP
I scandal NN
O took VBD
O away RB
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
B <apost>s POS
I insurance NN
I policy NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I death NN
O of IN
O CIA NNP
O Director NNP
I William NNP
I Casey NNP
O and CC
I resignation NN
O of IN
I Oliver NNP
I North NNP
O allowed VBD
I anti-Noriega JJ
I political JJ
I forces NNS
O to TO
O gain VB
I influence NN
O <period> <period>
I Public JJ
I protests NNS
O against IN
I him PRP
O were VBD
O triggered VBN
O in IN
I June NNP
I 1987 CD
O due JJ
O to TO
I charges NNS
O by IN
I Diaz NNP
I Herrera NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I his PRP<dollar>
I former JJ
I chief NN
O of IN
I staff NN
O <comma> <comma>
O that IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O had VBD
O stolen VBN
I the DT
I 1984 CD
I election NN
O and CC
O had VBD
O ordered VBN
I the DT
I killing NN
O of IN
I Messrs<period> NNP
I Spadafora NNP
I and CC
I Torrijos NNP
O <period> <period>
I Few NNP
I American JJ
I officials NNS
O were VBD
O willing JJ
O any RB
O longer RB
O to TO
O defend VB
I him PRP
O <period> <period>
I Lawyers NNS
O in IN
I Miami NNP
O -- =colon=
I this DT
I time NN
O working VBG
O virtually RB
O without IN
I impediment NN
O -- =colon=
O prepared VBN
O to TO
O have VB
I him PRP
O indicted VBN
O on IN
I drug NN
I charges NNS
O in IN
I February NNP
I 1988 CD
O <period> <period>
O During IN
I negotiations NNS
O with IN
I American JJ
I officials NNS
O in IN
I May NNP
I 1988 CD
O over IN
I proposals NNS
O to TO
O drop VB
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I indictments NNS
O in IN
I exchange NN
O for IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I resignation NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O often RB
O asked VBD
O almost RB
O plaintively RB
O how WRB
I the DT
I Americans NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
I whom WP
B he PRP
O had VBD
O helped VBN
O for IN
I so RB
I many JJ
I years NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O could MD
O turn VB
O against IN
I him PRP
O <period> <period>
O Now RB
O <comma> <comma>
I neither DT
I side NN
O -- =colon=
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O nor CC
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O -- =colon=
O has VBZ
I an DT
I easy JJ
I out RB
O <period> <period>
I President NNP
I Bush NNP
O has VBZ
O sworn VBN
O to TO
O bring VB
I him PRP
O to TO
I justice NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
O believes VBZ
I he PRP
O has VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
I any DT
I alternative NN
O but CC
O to TO
O continue VB
O clutching VBG
O to TO
I power VB
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O is VBZ
I a DT
I knock-out JJ
I battle NN
O -- =colon=
O perhaps RB
O to TO
I the DT
I death NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I the DT
I end NN
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
I Mr<period> NNP
I Noriega NNP
B the DT
I political JJ
I equivalent NN
O of IN
I Frankenstein NNP
B <apost>s POS
I monster NN
O <comma> <comma>
O created VBN
O by IN
I a DT
I well-intentioned JJ
I but CC
I misguided JJ
I foreign JJ
I power NN
O ? <period>
O Not RB
O quite RB
O <comma> <comma>
I Sen<period> NNP
I Leahy NNP
O contends VBZ
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O For IN
I short-term JJ
I gains NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I people NNS
O were VBD
O willing JJ
O to TO
O put VB
O up IN
O with IN
I him PRP
O <period> <period>
I That DT
O allowed VBN
I him PRP
O to TO
O get VB
O stronger JJR
O and CC
O stronger JJR
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O says VBZ
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O think VB
I we PRP
O created VBD
I him PRP
O as RB
O much JJ
O as IN
I we PRP
O fed VBD
I him PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O nurtured VBD
I him PRP
O and CC
O let VB
I him PRP
O grow VB
O up VB
O to TO
O be VB
O big JJ
O and CC
O strong JJ
O <period> <period>
I UPJOHN NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O reported VBD
O that IN
I third-quarter JJ
I net JJ
I income NN
O rose VBD
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 96 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 52 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 89<period>6 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 49 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
I Yesterday NN
B <apost>s POS
I edition NN
O provided VBD
I analysts NNS
B <apost> POS
I estimates NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I company NN
O when WRB
I actual JJ
I earnings NNS
O were VBD
O available JJ
O <period> <period>
I Industrial JJ
I production NN
O declined VBD
I 0<period>1 CD
I <percent> NN
O in IN
I September NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O reinforcing VBG
I other JJ
I signs NNS
O that IN
I the DT
I manufacturing NN
I sector NN
O continues VBZ
I its PRP<dollar>
I slowing NN
I trend NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Federal NNP
I Reserve NNP
I Board NNP
O said VBD
I output NN
O of IN
I the DT
I nation NN
B <apost>s POS
I factories NNS
I <comma> <comma>
I mines NNS
I and CC
I utilities NNS
O expanded VBN
O at IN
I an DT
I annual JJ
I rate NN
O of IN
I 1<period>3 CD
I <percent> NN
O in IN
I the DT
I third JJ
I quarter NN
O <comma> <comma>
O substantially RB
O slower JJR
O than IN
I the DT
I 3<period>3 CD
I <percent> NN
I annual JJ
I rate NN
O in IN
I the DT
I second JJ
I quarter NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Capital NNP
I spending NN
I and CC
I exports NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O have VBP
O been VBN
I the DT
I driving VBG
I force NN
O in IN
I this DT
I expansion NN
O <comma> <comma>
O are VBP
O showing VBG
I clear JJ
I signs NNS
O of IN
O having VBG
I the DT
I steam NN
O taken VBN
O out IN
O of IN
I them PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Robert NNP
I Dederick NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I economist NN
O for IN
I Northern NNP
I Trust NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O in IN
I Chicago NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I new JJ
I reports NNS
O of IN
I sluggishness NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O were VBD
O foreshadowed VBN
O by IN
I an DT
I earlier RBR
I Labor NNP
I Department NNP
I report NN
O that IN
I manufacturing NN
I payrolls NNS
O dropped VBN
O by IN
I 105<comma>000 CD
O in IN
I September NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O give VB
I the DT
I Fed NNP
B another DT
I reason NN
O to TO
O further VB
O ease VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I grip NN
O on IN
I credit NN
O and CC
O lower JJR
I interest NN
I rates NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I They PRP
O need VBP
O to TO
O do VB
I something NN
O about IN
I this DT
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Maury NNP
I Harris NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I economist NN
O at IN
I PaineWebber NNP
I Group NNP
I Inc NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Fed NNP
O also RB
O said VBD
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I industry NN
O operated VBN
O at IN
I 83<period>6 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I capacity NN
B last JJ
I month NN
O <comma> <comma>
O down RB
O from IN
I 83<period>8 CD
I <percent> NN
O in IN
I August NNP
O <period> <period>
I Measures NNS
O of IN
I manufacturing NN
I activity NN
O fell VBD
O more JJR
O than IN
I the DT
I overall JJ
I measures NNS
O <period> <period>
I Factory NN
I output NN
O dropped VBD
I 0<period>2 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
I its PRP<dollar>
I first JJ
I decline NN
O since IN
I February NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O after IN
O having VBG
O been VBN
O unchanged JJ
O in IN
I October NNP
O <period> <period>
I Factories NNS
O operated VBN
O at IN
I 83<period>7 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I capacity NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I lowest JJS
I rate NN
O in IN
I more JJR
I than IN
I a DT
I year NN
O and CC
O down RB
O from IN
I 84<period>1 CD
I <percent> NN
O in IN
I September NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I declines NNS
O mainly RB
O reflected VBD
I widespread JJ
I weakness NN
O in IN
I durable JJ
I goods NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I those DT
O intended VBN
O to TO
O last VB
I more JJR
I than IN
I three CD
I years NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I biggest JJS
I drop NN
O was VBD
O recorded VBN
O by IN
I primary JJ
I metals NNS
I producers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I category NN
B that WDT
O includes VBZ
I the DT
I steel NN
I industry NN
O <period> <period>
I Output NN
O of IN
I business NN
I equipment NN
O was VBD
O unchanged JJ
O in IN
I September NNP
O <period> <period>
I Production NN
O of IN
I factory NN
I equipment NN
O <comma> <comma>
I one CD
I indication NN
O of IN
I the DT
I strength NN
O of IN
I manufacturers NNS
B <apost> POS
I investment NN
I spending NN
O <comma> <comma>
O fell VBD
I 0<period>3 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I Some DT
I economists NNS
O expect VBP
I further JJ
I declines NNS
O in IN
I investment NN
I spending NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Whenever WRB
I corporate JJ
I profits NNS
O are VBP
O weak JJ
I that WDT
O means VBZ
I capital NN
I spending NN
O is VBZ
O going VBG
O to TO
O soften VB
O subsequently RB
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Harris NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I You PRP
O have VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O seen VBN
I the DT
I full JJ
I effect NN
O of IN
I that DT
O yet RB
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I A DT
I decline NN
O in IN
I truck NN
I production NN
O more JJR
O than IN
O offset VB
I a DT
I sharp JJ
I rise NN
O in IN
I auto NN
I assemblies NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Fed NNP
O noted VBD
O <period> <period>
I Analysts NNS
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O expect VB
I the DT
I September NNP
I surge NN
O in IN
I auto NN
I production NN
O to TO
O be VB
O repeated VBN
O in IN
I the DT
I coming VBG
I months NNS
O <period> <period>
I Here RB
O is VBZ
I a DT
I summary NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Federal NNP
I Reserve NNP
I Board NNP
B <apost>s POS
I report NN
O on IN
I industrial JJ
I production NN
O in IN
I September NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I figures NNS
O are VBP
O seasonally RB
O adjusted VBN
O <period> <period>
I 142<period>3 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I the DT
I 1977 CD
I average JJ
O <period> <period>
I Robin NNP
I Honiss NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I president NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I executive JJ
I officer NN
O of IN
I this DT
I bank NN
I holding VBG
I company NN
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
O elected VBN
O to TO
I the DT
I additional JJ
I posts NNS
O of IN
I chairman NN
O <comma> <comma>
I president NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I executive NN
O of IN
I the DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I New NNP
I England NNP
I Savings NNP
I Bank NNP
I subsidiary NN
O <period> <period>
I William NNP
I R<period> NNP
I Attridge NNP
O resigned VBD
I those DT
I posts NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O as RB
O well RB
O as IN
I a DT
I seat NN
O on IN
I NESB NNP
B <apost>s POS
I board NN
O <period> <period>
I NESB NNP
O is VBZ
O also RB
I the DT
I parent NN
O of IN
I Omnibank NNP
O <period> <period>
I Lung-cancer NN
I mortality NN
I rates NNS
O for IN
I people NNS
O under IN
I 45 CD
I years NNS
O of IN
I age NN
O have VBP
O begun VBN
O to TO
O decline VB
O <comma> <comma>
I federal JJ
I researchers NNS
O report VBP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I drop NN
O is VBZ
O particularly RB
O large JJ
O for IN
I white JJ
I males NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O although IN
I black JJ
I males NNS
O and CC
I white JJ
I and CC
I black JJ
I women NNS
O also RB
O show VBP
I lower JJR
I mortality NN
I rates NNS
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I report NN
O in IN
I this DT
I week NN
B <apost>s POS
I issue NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Journal NNP
O of IN
I the DT
I National NNP
I Cancer NNP
I Institute NNP
O also RB
O projects VBZ
O that IN
I overall JJ
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I mortality NN
I rates NNS
O from IN
I lung NN
I cancer NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I leading VBG
I cause NN
O of IN
I cancer NN
I death NN
O <comma> <comma>
O should MD
O begin VB
O to TO
O drop VB
O in IN
I several JJ
I years NNS
O if IN
I cigarette NN
I smoking NN
O continues VBZ
O to TO
O abate VB
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I report NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O comes VBZ
I 25 CD
I years NNS
O after IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I Surgeon NNP
I General NNP
O issued VBD
I a DT
I report NN
O warning NN
O against IN
I the DT
I dangers NNS
O of IN
I smoking NN
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
I the DT
I strongest JJS
I indication NN
O to TO
I date VB
O that IN
I the DT
I reduction NN
O in IN
I smoking NN
O is VBZ
O leading VBG
O to TO
I lower JJR
I death NN
I rates NNS
O from IN
I lung NN
I cancer NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I What WP
B this DT
O is VBZ
O saying VBG
O is VBZ
O that IN
I the DT
I surgeon NN
I general NN
B <apost>s POS
I message NN
O is VBZ
O having VBG
I an DT
I impact NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Melvyn NNP
I Tockman NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I epidemiologist NN
O at IN
I the DT
I Johns NNP
I Hopkins NNP
I School NNP
O of IN
I Hygiene NNP
O and CC
I Public NNP
I Health NNP
O in IN
I Baltimore NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I National NNP
I Cancer NNP
I Institute NNP
I report NN
O compares VBZ
I mortality NN
I rates NNS
O of IN
I two CD
I groups NNS
O of IN
I people NNS
O between IN
I the DT
I ages NNS
O of IN
I 35 CD
I and CC
I 44 CD
B a DT
I decade NN
O apart RB
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I death NN
I rate NN
O from IN
I lung NN
I cancer NN
O of IN
I white JJ
I males NNS
O aged VBN
I 35 CD
O to TO
I 44 CD
O in IN
I the DT
I mid-1970s NNS
O was VBD
I 13<period>4 CD
O per IN
I 100<comma>000 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I the DT
I mortality NN
I rate NN
O of IN
I the DT
I same JJ
I age NN
I group NN
O in IN
I the DT
I mid-1980s NNS
O was VBD
I 9<period>6 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I decline NN
O of IN
I 28<period>7 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
O Measured VBN
I the DT
I same JJ
I way NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I decline NN
O for IN
I black JJ
I males NNS
O was VBD
I 14<period>2 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I drop NN
O in IN
I mortality NN
I rates NNS
O for IN
I women NNS
O was VBD
O less RBR
O steep JJ
O -- =colon=
I 8<period>9 CD
I <percent> NN
O for IN
I blacks NNS
O and CC
I 5<period>3 CD
I <percent> NN
O for IN
I whites NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I study NN
O <comma> <comma>
O by IN
I Susan NNP
I Devesa NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I William NNP
I Blot NNP
O and CC
I Joseph NNP
I Fraumeni NNP
O of IN
I the DT
I institute NN
B <apost>s POS
I staff NN
O <comma> <comma>
O also RB
O shows VBZ
O that IN
I the DT
I incidence NN
O of IN
I lung NN
I cancer NN
O as RB
O well RB
O as IN
I the DT
I death NN
I rate NN
O declined VBD
O over IN
I the DT
I decade NN
O for IN
I all DT
I groups NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I 35-44 JJ
I age NN
I bracket NN
O <comma> <comma>
O except IN
I black JJ
I men NNS
O <period> <period>
O Although IN
I lung-cancer NN
I mortality NN
I rates NNS
O are VBP
O increasing VBG
O for IN
I the DT
I nation NN
O as IN
I a DT
I whole NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I report NN
O projects VBZ
O that IN
I death NN
I rates NNS
O will MD
O begin VB
O to TO
O decline VB
O in IN
I the DT
I 1990s CD
O for IN
I men NNS
O and CC
O after IN
I the DT
I year NN
I 2000 CD
O for IN
I women NNS
O <period> <period>
I Lung-cancer NN
I mortality NN
I rates NNS
O increase VBP
O with IN
I age NN
O and CC
O are VBP
O continuing VBG
O to TO
O rise VB
O for IN
I all DT
I age NN
I groups NNS
O over IN
I 55 NN
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I sharp JJ
I increases NNS
O for IN
I everybody NN
O but CC
I white JJ
I men NNS
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I Dr<period> NNP
I Fraumeni NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I one CD
O of IN
I the DT
I authors NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I report NN
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
O <quote> <quote>
I the DT
I declining VBG
I rates NNS
B we PRP
O <apost>re VBP
O seeing VBG
O for IN
I younger JJR
I people NNS
B we PRP
O believe VBP
O may MD
O be VB
I a DT
I harbinger NN
O of IN
I declining VBG
I mortality NN
O in IN
I the DT
I future NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O However RB
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O stressed VBD
O that IN
I the DT
I improvement NN
O depends VBZ
O on IN
I a DT
I continued VBN
I reduction NN
O in IN
I smoking NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Even RB
O though IN
I these DT
I favorable JJ
I trends NNS
O in IN
I lung-cancer NN
I mortality NN
O affect NN
I all DT
I sex NN
I and CC
I race NN
I groups NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I they PRP
O ca MD
O n<apost>t RB
O be VB
O taken VBN
O for IN
O granted VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I the DT
I report NN
O says NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Smoking NNP
I prevention NN
I programs NNS
O should MD
O reach VB
I larger JJR
I segments NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I population NN
O <comma> <comma>
I especially RB
I children NNS
I <comma> <comma>
I adolescents NNS
I and CC
I minorities NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I An DT
I editorial NN
O in IN
I the DT
I NCI NNP
I Journal NNP
O says VBZ
I the DT
I report NN
O of IN
I declining VBG
I lung-cancer NN
I mortality NN
I <quote> <quote>
O among IN
I young JJ
I men NNS
I and CC
I women NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O indicates VBZ
O that IN
I we PRP
O finally RB
O may MD
O be VB
O winning VBG
I the DT
I battle NN
O -- =colon=
I this DT
O even RB
O in IN
I a DT
I country NN
O where WRB
I the DT
I tobacco NN
I industry NN
O spends VBZ
I over IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2 CD
I billion CD
B a DT
I year NN
O for IN
I promotion NN
O of IN
I the DT
I addictive JJ
I habit NN
O of IN
I smoking NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O But CC
I the DT
I editorial NN
O <comma> <comma>
O by IN
I Jan NNP
I Stjernsward NNP
O of IN
I the DT
I World NNP
I Health NNP
I Organization NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O notes VBZ
O that DT
I tobacco NN
I consumption NN
I and CC
I lung-cancer NN
I mortality NN
I rates NNS
O are VBP
O rising VBG
O in IN
I developing VBG
I countries NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Non-smoking NN
O should MD
O be VB
O established VBN
O as IN
I the DT
I norm NN
O of IN
I social JJ
I behavior NN
O <quote> <quote>
O around IN
I the DT
I world NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I editorial NN
O says VBZ
O <comma> <comma>
O through IN
I the DT
I enactment NN
O of IN
I laws NNS
B that WDT
O limit VBP
I advertising VBG
O <comma> <comma>
O boost VB
I tobacco NN
I prices NNS
O and CC
O promote VB
I anti-smoking JJ
I education NN
O <period> <period>
O Asked VBN
O for IN
I comment NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Walker NNP
I Merryman NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I vice NN
I president NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Tobacco NNP
I Institute NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I new JJ
I efforts NNS
O to TO
O restrict VB
I tobacco NN
I advertising NN
O in IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O could MD
O violate VB
I the DT
I First NNP
I Amendment NNP
I protection NN
O of IN
I free JJ
I speech NN
O <period> <period>
O According VBG
O to TO
I the DT
I American NNP
I Cancer NNP
I Society NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I smoking NN
O is VBZ
O responsible JJ
O for IN
I 85 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I the DT
I lung-cancer NN
I cases NNS
O among IN
I men NNS
O and CC
I 75 CD
I <percent> NN
O among IN
I women NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I NCI NNP
I report NN
O attributes VBZ
I the DT
I differences NNS
O in IN
I mortality NN
I rates NNS
O by IN
I race NN
O to TO
I different JJ
I smoking NN
I patterns NNS
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I higher JJR
I proportion NN
O of IN
I black JJ
I men NNS
O smoke VBP
O than IN
I white JJ
I men NNS
O <period> <period>
O While IN
I nearly RB
I equal JJ
I percentages NNS
O of IN
I black JJ
I and CC
I white JJ
I women NNS
O currently JJ
O smoke NN
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I both DT
I sexes NNS
B more JJR
I whites NNS
O have VBP
O given VBN
O up IN
I smoking NN
O than IN
I blacks NNS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
O comparing VBG
I changes NNS
O in IN
I mortality NN
I rates NNS
O over IN
I the DT
I past JJ
I decade NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I NCI NNP
I study NN
O looked VBD
O only RB
O at IN
I blacks NNS
I and CC
I whites NNS
O <period> <period>
I Asians NNS
O and CC
I native JJ
I Americans NNPS
O were VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O studied VBN
O <colon> =colon=
I Hispanics NNPS
O were VBD
O included VBN
O with IN
I whites NNS
O <period> <period>
I Recent JJ
I changes NNS
O in IN
I average JJ
I annual JJ
I age-specific JJ
I lung-cancer NN
I rates NNS
O per IN
I 100<comma>000 CD
I population NN
O by IN
I race NN
I and CC
I sex NN
O <period> <period>
I White NNP
I Males NNPS
I White NNP
I Females NNPS
I Black NNP
I Males NNPS
I Black NNP
I Females NNPS
I Directors NNS
O elected VBD
I R<period> NNP
I Marvin NNP
I Womack NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O currently JJ
I vice NN
I president<bslash><fslash>product NN
I supply NN
I <comma> <comma>
I purchasing VBG
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
O head VB
I the DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I Washington NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I D<period>C<period> NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I office NN
O <period> <period>
O As IN
I vice NN
I president<bslash><fslash>national-government NN
I relations NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Womack NNP
O will MD
O work VB
O with IN
I P<amp>G NNP
B <apost>s POS
I top JJ
I management NN
O and CC
O with IN
I the DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I government-relations NNS
I staff VBP
O <quote> <quote>
O to TO
O represent VB
I P<amp>G NNP
B <apost>s POS
I interests NNS
O at IN
I the DT
I federal JJ
I level NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I John NNP
I G<period> NNP
I Smale NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I chairman NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I executive JJ
I officer NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Smale NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I appointment NN
O <quote> <quote>
O recognizes VBZ
I the DT
I growing VBG
I influence NN
O of IN
I government NN
O on IN
I our PRP<dollar>
I business NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Womack NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 53 CD
I years NNS
O old JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O with IN
I the DT
I big JJ
I producer NN
O of IN
I household NN
I products NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I food NN
O and CC
I pharmaceuticals NNS
O for IN
I 30 CD
I years NNS
O <period> <period>
I Traders NNS
O trying VBG
O to TO
O profit VB
O from IN
I the DT
I recent JJ
I volatility NN
O in IN
I financial JJ
I markets NNS
O invaded VBD
I the DT
I Nasdaq NNP
I over-the-counter JJ
I market NN
O <comma> <comma>
O prompting VBG
I even RB
I more JJR
I swings NNS
O in IN
I stock NN
I prices NNS
O <period> <period>
O After IN
O gaining VBG
I strength NN
O during IN
I a DT
I brief JJ
I run-up NN
O when WRB
I trading NN
O began VBD
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Nasdaq NNP
I Composite NNP
I Index NNP
O weakened VBD
O under IN
I selling VBG
I pressure NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I forces NNS
O at IN
I work NN
O included VBD
I computer-guided JJ
I trading NN
O <comma> <comma>
O as RB
O well RB
O as IN
I profit-driven CD
I market NN
I makers NNS
O and CC
I institutional JJ
I investors NNS
B who WP
O had VBD
O bought VBN
I stock NN
O on IN
I the DT
I cheap NN
O during IN
I the DT
I recent JJ
I correction NN
O <period> <period>
O During IN
I the DT
I last JJ
I two CD
I hours NNS
O of IN
I trading NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I composite JJ
O almost RB
O drew VBD
O even RB
O on IN
I the DT
I day NN
O before IN
O slipping VBG
O again RB
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Nasdaq NNP
I Composite NNP
O closed VBD
O down RB
I 1<period>05 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 0<period>2 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I 459<period>93 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I action NN
O was VBD
O confined VBN
O to TO
I Nasdaq NNP
B <apost>s POS
I biggest JJS
I and CC
I most RBS
I liquid JJ
I stocks NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I traders NNS
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Nasdaq NNP
I 100 CD
I Index NNP
O began VBD
I the DT
I day NN
O at IN
I 449<period>89 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O lost VBD
I 2 CD
I <percent> NN
O at IN
I one CD
I point NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O was VBD
O up IN
I 0<period>4 CD
I <percent> NN
O at IN
I another DT
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I barometer NN
O of IN
I the DT
I biggest JJS
I nonfinancial JJ
I stocks NNS
O settled VBD
O at IN
I 448<period>49 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O off IN
I 1<period>40 CD
O <period> <period>
I Its PRP<dollar>
I counterpart NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Nasdaq NNP
I Financial NNP
I Index NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
O weak JJ
O for IN
I most RBS
O of IN
I the DT
I day NN
O <comma> <comma>
O sliding VBG
I 2<period>51 CD
O to TO
I 453<period>57 CD
O by IN
I the DT
I end NN
O of IN
I trading NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I volatility NN
O was VBD
O dizzying JJ
O for IN
I traders NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I market NN
O must MD
O have VB
O turned VBN
O up IN
O and CC
O down RB
I 15 CD
I different JJ
I times NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O commented VBD
I Lance NNP
I Zipper NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I head NN
O of IN
I OTC NNP
I trading NN
O at IN
I Kidder NNP
I Peabody NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Every DT
I time NN
B you PRP
O thought VBD
I it PRP
O was VBD
O going VBG
O into IN
I a DT
I rally NN
B it PRP
O gave VBD
O up IN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I every DT
I time NN
B you PRP
O thought VBD
I it PRP
O would MD
O rally VB
I it PRP
O came VBD
O down RB
O <period> <period>
I This DT
O is VBZ
I a DT
I tough JJ
I market NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Zipper NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I market NN
O is VBZ
O still RB
O settling VBG
O down RB
O after IN
I the DT
I recent JJ
I correction NN
O <period> <period>
I Most JJS
O of IN
I trading NN
I action NN
O now RB
O is VBZ
O from IN
I professional JJ
I traders NNS
B who WP
O are VBP
O trying VBG
O to TO
O take VB
I advantage NN
O of IN
I the DT
I price NN
I swings NNS
O to TO
O turn VB
I a DT
I quick JJ
I profit NN
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O and CC
I other JJ
I traders NNS
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Everybody NN
O <apost>s POS
O confused VBN
O and CC
I no DT
I one CD
O has VBZ
I an DT
I opinion NN
B that WDT
O lasts VBZ
O longer RB
O than IN
I 30 CD
I seconds NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Zipper NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I A DT
I lot NN
O of IN
I the DT
I professional JJ
I traders NNS
O are VBP
O just RB
O going VBG
O back RB
O and CC
O forth RB
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O <apost>re VBP
O just RB
O as IN
O confused VBN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I William NNP
I Rothe NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I head NN
O of IN
I OTC NNP
I trading NN
O at IN
I Alex NNP
I <period> <period>
I Brown NNP
I <amp> CC
I Sons NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I Baltimore NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I program NN
I trading NN
O is VBZ
O keeping VBG
I the DT
I markets NNS
O unsettled JJ
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O believes VBZ
O that IN
I the DT
I volatile JJ
I conditions NNS
O created VBN
O by IN
I program NN
I trading NN
O has VBZ
O <quote> <quote>
O thoroughly RB
O confused VBN
O <quote> <quote>
I investors NNS
O about IN
O where WRB
I the DT
I market NN
O is VBZ
O headed VBN
O <period> <period>
I Program NN
I trading NN
O is VBZ
O <quote> <quote>
O benefiting VBG
I a DT
I few JJ
O to TO
I the DT
I detriment NN
O of IN
I many JJ
O and CC
I I PRP
O wish VBP
I someone NN
O would MD
O do VB
I something NN
O about IN
I it PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O complained VBD
O <period> <period>
I Trading NN
I activity NN
O cooled VBN
O off IN
O from IN
I Monday NNP
B <apost>s POS
I sizzling JJ
I pace NN
O <period> <period>
I Share NN
I turnover NN
O subsided VBD
O to TO
I 161<period>5 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I Advancing VBG
I and CC
I declining VBG
I issues NNS
O finished VBD
O about IN
O even RB
O <period> <period>
O Of IN
I the DT
I 4<comma>345 CD
I stocks NNS
B that WDT
O changed VBD
I hands NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I 1<comma>174 CD
O declined VBD
O and CC
I 1<comma>040 CD
O advanced VBD
O <period> <period>
I One CD
I big JJ
I technology NN
I issue NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Novell NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O rode VBD
I the DT
I roller NN
I coaster NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I stock NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O finished VBD
I Monday NNP
O at IN
I 29 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>2 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O traded VBD
O as RB
O high JJ
O as IN
I 29 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O and CC
O as RB
O low JJ
O as IN
I 28 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O before IN
O closing VBG
O at IN
I 29 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O down RB
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O was VBD
I a DT
I jarring VBG
I day NN
O for IN
I investors NNS
O in IN
I Genetics NNP
I Institute NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I stock NN
O tumbled VBD
I 2 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O on IN
I news NN
O that IN
I it PRP
O might MD
O have VB
O to TO
O take VB
I a DT
I charge NN
O against IN
I earnings NNS
O if IN
I it PRP
O ca MD
O n<apost>t RB
O successfully RB
O resolve VB
I a DT
I dispute NN
O with IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I European JJ
I licensee NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Boehringer NNP
I Mannheim NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O over IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I anti-anemia NN
I drug NN
O <comma> <comma>
I EPO NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I stock NN
O recovered VBD
O somewhat RB
O to TO
O finish VB
I 1 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O lower JJR
O at IN
I 26 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I a DT
I statement NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Genetics NNP
I Institute NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I dispute NN
O with IN
I Boehringer NNP
O centers NNS
O on IN
I questions NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I usability NN
O of IN
I certain JJ
I batches NNS
O of IN
I EPO NNP
I material NN
O valued VBN
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 13<period>6 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
O Earlier RBR
I this DT
I week NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Genetics NNP
I Institute NNP
O reported VBD
I wider JJR
I losses NNS
O in IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I fiscal JJ
I third JJ
I quarter NN
O ended VBN
I Aug<period> NNP
I 31 CD
O <period> <period>
I Price NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O jumped VBD
I 2 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O to TO
I 44 CD
O on IN
I 1<period>7 CD
I million CD
I shares NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I wholesaler NN
O of IN
I cash NN
I and CC
I carry VB
I merchandise NN
O reported VBD
I fiscal JJ
I fourthquarter NN
I earnings NNS
B that WDT
O were VBD
O better JJR
O than IN
I analysts NNS
O had VBD
O expected VBN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I company NN
O also RB
O pleased VBD
I analysts NNS
O by IN
O announcing VBG
I four CD
I new JJ
I store NN
I openings NNS
O planned VBN
O for IN
I fiscal JJ
I 1990 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O ending VBG
I next JJ
I August NNP
O <period> <period>
I That DT
O will MD
O bring VB
I the DT
I total NN
O for IN
I the DT
I year NN
O to TO
I 10 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O from IN
I five CD
O during IN
I fiscal JJ
I 1989 CD
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Every DT
I year NN
B we PRP
O <apost>ve VBP
O been VBN
O waiting VBG
O for IN
I stepped-up JJ
I expansion NN
O from IN
I the DT
I company NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I news NN
O could MD
O n<apost>t RB
O have VB
O been VBN
O better JJR
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Linda NNP
I Kristiansen NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Dean NNP
I Witter NNP
I Reynolds NNP
I analyst NN
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I an DT
I interview NN
O <period> <period>
I Intermec NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I maker NN
O of IN
I optical JJ
I character-recognition NN
I devices NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O also RB
O reported VBD
I higher JJR
I third-quarter JJ
I earnings NNS
O <period> <period>
I Its PRP<dollar>
I shares NNS
O added VBD
I 3<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O to TO
I 30 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I favorable JJ
I earnings NNS
O was VBD
O n<apost>t RB
I a DT
I guarantee NN
O that IN
I a DT
I stock NN
B <apost>s POS
I price NN
O would MD
O improve VB
I yesterday NN
O <period> <period>
I MCI NNP
I Communications NNPS
O tumbled VBD
I 2 CD
I 5<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 42 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O on IN
I 4<period>7 CD
I million CD
I shares NNS
O even RB
O though IN
I the DT
I telecommunications NNS
I giant NN
O reported VBD
I a DT
I 63 CD
I <percent> NN
I increase NN
O in IN
I third-quarter JJ
I profit NN
O <period> <period>
I CoreStates NNP
I Financial NNP
O slipped VBD
I 3<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 43 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O in IN
I active JJ
I trading NN
O after IN
O reporting VBG
O that IN
I third-quarter JJ
I earnings NNS
O improved VBN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>27 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>15 CD
B a DT
I share NN
B a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
O However RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I bank NN
I holding VBG
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I loan-loss NN
I reserves NNS
O rose VBD
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 177<period>3 CD
I million CD
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 154 CD
I million CD
B a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
I A<amp>W NNP
I Brands NNP
O lost VBD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O to TO
I 27 CD
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I its PRP<dollar>
I thirdquarter JJ
I earnings NNS
O rose VBD
O to TO
I 26 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O from IN
I 18 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
B last JJ
I year NN
O <period> <period>
I Capital NNP
I Associates NNPS
O dropped VBD
I 1 CD
O to TO
I 5 VB
I 3<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I company NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O leases VBZ
I technology NN
I equipment NN
O <comma> <comma>
O reported VBD
I substantially RB
I lower JJR
I net JJ
I income NN
O for IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I fiscal JJ
I first JJ
I quarter NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O ended VBN
I Aug<period> NNP
I 31 CD
O <period> <period>
I Robert NNP
I M<period> NNP
I Jelenic NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 39 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
O named VBN
I president NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I operating VBG
I officer NN
O of IN
I this DT
I closely RB
I held VBN
I publisher NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I post NN
O had VBD
O been VBN
O vacant JJ
O for IN
I more JJR
I than IN
I a DT
I year NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Jelenic NNP
O had VBD
O been VBN
I executive JJ
I vice NN
I president NN
O for IN
I operations NNS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I addition NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Ralph NNP
I Ingersoll NNP
I II NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 43 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I chairman NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I executive NN
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I he PRP
O would MD
O take VB
O on IN
I additional JJ
I responsibilities NNS
O as IN
I editor NN
O in IN
I chief NN
O of IN
I the DT
I company NN
O <period> <period>
I John NNP
I Wilpers NNP
O resigned VBD
O as IN
I editor NN
O in IN
I chief NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Ingersoll NNP
O remains VBZ
I editor NN
O in IN
I chief NN
O of IN
I the DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I recently RB
I launched VBN
I daily JJ
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I St<period> NNP
I Louis NNP
I Sun NNP
O <period> <period>
O Also RB
O <comma> <comma>
I Jean NNP
I B<period> NNP
I Clifton NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 28 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
O named VBN
I executive JJ
I vice NN
I president NN
O <comma> <comma>
I treasurer NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I financial JJ
I officer NN
O <period> <period>
I Michael NNP
I Applebaum NNP
O resigned VBD
O after IN
I less JJR
I than IN
I a DT
I year NN
O in IN
I the DT
I posts NNS
O <period> <period>
I Ms<period> NNP
I Clifton NNP
O had VBD
O been VBN
I executive NN
I financial JJ
I assistant NN
O to TO
I the DT
I chairman NN
O <period> <period>
O Certainly RB
I conservative JJ
I environmentalists NNS
O can MD
O defend VB
I their PRP<dollar>
I limited JJ
I government NN
I position NN
O by IN
O differentiating VBG
O between IN
I Old NNP
I Environmentalism NNP
O and CC
I New NNP
I Environmentalism NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
O <quote> <quote>
I Journalists NNS
I and CC
I Others NNS
O for IN
O Saving VBG
I the DT
I Planet NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O by IN
I David NNP
I Brooks NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I editorial NN
I page NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Oct<period> NNP
I 5 NN
O <rparen> <rparen>
O <period> <period>
I Old NNP
I Environmentalism NNP
O involved VBD
I microbe NN
I hunters NNS
O and CC
I sanitationists NNS
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O started VBD
O with IN
I improvements NNS
O in IN
I hygiene NN
O made VBD
O possible JJ
O by IN
I affordable JJ
I soap NN
O and CC
I washable JJ
I underwear NN
O during IN
I the DT
I Industrial NNP
I Revolution NNP
O <period> <period>
O Then RB
I cast-iron NN
I sewer NN
I pipe NN
O and CC
I the DT
I flush JJ
I toilet NN
O were VBD
O followed VBN
O by IN
I sewage NN
I - =colon=
I and CC
I water-treatment NN
I plants NNS
O toward IN
I the DT
I end NN
O of IN
I the DT
I 19th JJ
I century NN
O <period> <period>
I Medicine NNP
O in IN
I the DT
I 19th JJ
I century NN
O was VBD
O dedicated VBN
O mostly RB
O to TO
O combating VBG
I sepsis NN
O and CC
I diagnostic JJ
I analysis NN
O <period> <period>
O Then RB
I the DT
I 20th JJ
I century NN
O saw VBD
I the DT
I evolution NN
O of IN
I private-sector JJ
I wonder NN
I drugs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O promulgated VBD
I medical JJ
I therapy NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I process NN
O dramatically RB
O increased VBD
I our PRP<dollar>
I average JJ
I life NN
I expectancy NN
O <comma> <comma>
O eliminated VBN
I much JJ
I pain NN
O and CC
O constantly RB
O improved VBN
I health NN
I and CC
I well-being NN
O <period> <period>
I Most JJS
I public-health JJ
I measures NNS
O were VBD
O handled VBN
O at IN
I the DT
I local JJ
I level NN
O <period> <period>
I New NNP
I Environmentalism NNP
O probably RB
O started VBD
O in IN
I 1962 CD
O with IN
I the DT
I publication NN
O of IN
I Rachel NNP
I Carson NNP
B <apost>s POS
I book NN
O <quote> <quote>
I Silent NNP
I Spring NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Shortly RB
O thereafter RB
O <comma> <comma>
I hysterical JJ
I articles NNS
O began VBD
O to TO
O appear VB
O predicting VBG
O that WDT
I advanced VBD
I industrial JJ
I societies NNS
O would MD
O produce VB
I a DT
I blackened VBN
I <comma> <comma>
I uninhabitable JJ
I planet NN
O possibly RB
O by IN
I the DT
I turn NN
O of IN
I the DT
I century NN
O <period> <period>
I These DT
I apocalyptic JJ
I predictions NNS
O were VBD
O advanced VBN
O by IN
I such JJ
I stalwarts NNS
O as IN
I Paul NNP
I Ehrlich NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Barry NNP
I Commoner NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Rene NNP
I Dubois NNP
O and CC
I George NNP
I Wald NNP
O <period> <period>
O Writing VBG
O in IN
I the DT
I 1960s CD
B Ms<period> NNP
I Carson NNP
O suggested VBD
O that IN
I the DT
I human JJ
I race NN
O could MD
O be VB
O eliminated VBN
O in IN
I 20 CD
I years NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Mr<period> NNP
I Wald NNP
O suggested VBD
O that DT
I life NN
O on IN
I earth NN
O might MD
O end VB
O by IN
I 1985 CD
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Ehrlich NNP
O predicted VBD
I unprecedented JJ
I famine NN
O by IN
I 1980 CD
O <period> <period>
I There EX
O were VBD
I many RB
I more JJR
O <period> <period>
I Thousands NNS
O of IN
I chemical NN
I products NNS
O were VBD
O categorized VBN
O as IN
O carcinogenic JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I recommendations NNS
O that IN
I they PRP
O be VBP
O banned VBN
O from IN
I industrial JJ
I use NN
O because IN
I they PRP
O produced VBD
I malignant JJ
I tumors NNS
O in IN
I overdosed VBN
I rats NNS
O <period> <period>
O Unknown JJ
O before IN
I 1960 CD
O were VBD
I the DT
I inconclusive JJ
I effects NNS
O of IN
I acid NN
I rain NN
O <comma> <comma>
I greenhouse NN
I warming NN
O and CC
I ozone NN
I depletion NN
O <comma> <comma>
O all DT
O of IN
I which WDT
O required VBD
I burgeoning VBG
I political JJ
I power NN
O and CC
I gargantuan JJ
I expense NN
O <period> <period>
O Meanwhile RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I New NNP
I Environmentalists NNS
O systematically RB
O opposed VBN
I the DT
I methods NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I Old NNP
I Environmentalists NNS
O <period> <period>
I Local JJ
I pollution NN
I problems NNS
O require VBP
I cheap JJ
I energy NN
O and CC
I capital NN
O for IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I solution NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I the DT
I New NNP
I Environmentalists NNS
O oppose VBP
I private JJ
I wealth NN
I creation NN
O <lparen> <lparen>
I which WDT
O <comma> <comma>
I they PRP
O claim VBP
O <comma> <comma>
O depletes VBZ
I natural JJ
I resources NNS
O <rparen> <rparen>
O and CC
I nuclear JJ
I power NN
O <lparen> <lparen>
O even RB
O though IN
I it PRP
O would MD
O counteract VB
I the DT
I greenhouse NN
I effect NN
O <rparen> <rparen>
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O are VBP
O in IN
I the DT
I forefront NN
O of IN
O opposing VBG
I the DT
I search NN
O for IN
I new JJ
I landfills NNS
I and CC
I methods NNS
O of IN
I incineration NN
O and CC
O even RB
O oppose VB
I new JJ
I methods NNS
O of IN
I research NN
O such JJ
O as IN
I genetic JJ
I engineering NN
O <period> <period>
I New NNP
I Environmentalism NNP
O is VBZ
I an DT
I emotional JJ
I attack NN
O on IN
I proven VBN
I methods NNS
O of IN
O improving VBG
I our PRP<dollar>
I quality NN
O of IN
I life NN
O and CC
I a DT
I bid NN
O for IN
I political JJ
I power NN
O <period> <period>
O Let VB
I <apost>s POS
O rationalize VB
I our PRP<dollar>
I priorities NNS
O by IN
O solving VBG
I pollution NN
I problems NNS
O at IN
I the DT
I local JJ
I level NN
O as IN
O heretofore RB
O <period> <period>
I Harry NNP
I Lee NNP
I Smith NNP
B Alpharetta NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Ga NNP
O <period> <period>
I Your PRP<dollar>
I story NN
O missed VBD
I some DT
I essential JJ
I points NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I conference NN
O on IN
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I Global NNP
I Environment NNP
O =colon= =colon=
O Are VBP
I We PRP
O Overreacting VBG
O ? <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O First NNP
O and CC
O foremost JJ
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I vignettes NNS
O presented VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I various JJ
I scientists NNS
O represent VBP
I a DT
I general JJ
I consensus NN
O among IN
I specialists NNS
O working VBG
O in IN
I the DT
I respective JJ
I aspects NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I global JJ
I environment NN
O <period> <period>
O Consider VB
O <comma> <comma>
O for IN
I example NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I greenhouse NN
I effect NN
O and CC
I climate NN
I change NN
O <colon> =colon=
I numerous JJ
I blue-ribbon JJ
I scientific JJ
I committees NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O including VBG
I one CD
O from IN
I the DT
I National NNP
I Academy NNP
O of IN
I Science NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O judge NN
I there EX
O is VBZ
I a DT
I greater JJR
I than IN
I 50 CD
I <percent> NN
I probability NN
O of IN
I a DT
I grave JJ
I problem NN
O in IN
I the DT
I offing NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I point NN
O was VBD
O to TO
O answer VB
I the DT
I question NN
O in IN
I the DT
I conference NN
I title NN
O <comma> <comma>
O not RB
O to TO
O try VB
O to TO
O create VB
I news NN
I stories NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I event NN
I itself PRP
O <period> <period>
O Nor CC
O was VBD
I it PRP
O intended VBD
O to TO
O dictate VB
I a DT
I set NN
O of IN
I prescriptive JJ
I solutions NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O although IN
I various JJ
I points NNS
O were VBD
O raised VBN
O <period> <period>
I Each DT
I speaker NN
O was VBD
O asked VBN
O to TO
O address VB
I a DT
I specific JJ
I topic NN
O <comma> <comma>
O not RB
O deliver VB
I a DT
I point NN
O of IN
I view NN
O <period> <period>
I Each DT
I scientist NN
O independently RB
O concluded VBD
I society NN
I and CC
I government NN
O are VBP
O underreacting VBG
O when WRB
I it PRP
O comes VBZ
O to TO
I substantive JJ
I policy NN
I change NN
O <period> <period>
I This DT
O leads VBZ
O to TO
I a DT
I very RB
I special JJ
I sense NN
O of IN
I urgency NN
O <period> <period>
O If IN
I the DT
I media NNS
O decide VBP
O to TO
O work VB
O harder JJR
O at IN
O educating VBG
I the DT
I public NN
O about IN
I these DT
I complex JJ
I and CC
I technical JJ
I issues NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I that IN
O hardly RB
O can MD
O be VB
O termed VBN
I non-objective JJ
I journalism NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I environment NN
O can MD
O no RB
O longer RB
O be VB
I a DT
I normal JJ
I issue NN
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
O be VB
O dealt VBN
O with IN
O on IN
I a DT
I business-as-usual JJ
I basis NN
O with IN
I comfortable JJ
I increments NNS
O of IN
I change NN
O <period> <period>
I We PRP
O have VBP
O literally RB
O altered VBN
I the DT
I chemistry NN
I and CC
I physics NN
O of IN
I our PRP<dollar>
I planet NN
B <apost>s POS
I atmosphere NN
O <period> <period>
I This DT
O portends VBZ
I consequences NNS
O from IN
I what WP
B we PRP
O have VBP
O already RB
O done VBN
I that WDT
O will MD
O be VB
O very RB
O destabilizing VBG
O to TO
I social JJ
I and CC
I economic JJ
I systems NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I problems NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I environment NN
O are VBP
O so RB
O interrelated VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O so RB
O inextricably RB
O entwined VBN
O with IN
I our PRP<dollar>
I current JJ
I way NN
O of IN
I life NN
O and CC
O so RB
O large JJ
O that IN
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O unlikely JJ
I we PRP
O will MD
O be VB
O able JJ
O to TO
O address VB
I them PRP
O effectively RB
O unless IN
I major JJ
I changes NNS
O are VBP
O made VBN
O in IN
I less JJR
I than IN
I 10 CD
I years NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I consensus NN
O from IN
I the DT
I scientific JJ
I community NN
O is VBZ
O that IN
I there EX
O is VBZ
I sufficient JJ
I evidence NN
O to TO
O advise VB
I major JJ
I policy NN
I changes NNS
O <period> <period>
O No DT
O <comma> <comma>
I we PRP
O are VBP
O not RB
O overreacting VBG
O <period> <period>
I Thomas NNP
I E<period> NNP
I Lovejoy NNP
B Assistant NNP
I Secretary NNP
O for IN
I External NNP
I Affairs NNP
B Smithsonian NNP
I Institution NNP
I Coca-Cola NNP
I Enterprises NNPS
I Inc<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O fulfilling VBG
I its PRP<dollar>
I dismal JJ
I earnings NNS
I forecast NN
O for IN
I 1989 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I third-quarter JJ
I net JJ
I income NN
O fell VBD
I 68 CD
I <percent> NN
O on IN
I flat JJ
I revenue NN
O <period> <period>
O Stung VBN
O by IN
I higher JJR
I marketing NN
I costs NNS
O and CC
I slowing VBG
I volume NN
I growth NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I giant NN
I Coke NNP
I bottling NN
I operation NN
O said VBD
I net NN
O fell VBD
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 12<period>7 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I six CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 39<period>9 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 26 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I results NNS
O met VBD
I estimates NNS
O of IN
I analysts NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O had VBD
O already RB
O slashed VBN
I their PRP<dollar>
I projections NNS
O after IN
I the DT
I company NN
O said VBD
O in IN
I late JJ
I August NNP
O that IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I 1989 CD
I earnings NNS
O could MD
O tumble VB
I as RB
I much JJ
I as IN
I 37 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I company NN
I spokesman NN
O said VBD
I yesterday NN
O that IN
I Coca-Cola NNP
I Enterprises NNPS
O sticks NNS
O by IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I 1989 CD
I forecast NN
O <period> <period>
I Third-quarter JJ
I revenue NN
O was VBD
O flat JJ
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>02 CD
I billion CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I year-ago JJ
I results NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O however RB
O <comma> <comma>
O included VBD
I the DT
I operations NNS
O of IN
I a DT
I bottling NN
I business NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O was VBD
O sold VBN
I last JJ
I December NNP
O <period> <period>
O Excluding VBG
I that DT
I bottling NN
I business NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Coca-Cola NNP
I Enterprises NNPS
B <apost> POS
I volume NN
O <comma> <comma>
O measured VBN
O by IN
I cases NNS
O of IN
I soda NN
O <comma> <comma>
O rose VBD
I only RB
I 1 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I volume NN
O is VBZ
O well RB
O below IN
I the DT
I industry NN
B <apost>s POS
I 4 CD
I <percent> NN
I to TO
I 5 VB
I <percent> NN
I growth NN
I rate NN
O of IN
I recent JJ
I years NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O in IN
I line NN
O with IN
I other JJ
I soft-drink NN
I companies NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I third JJ
I quarter NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I latest JJS
I third-quarter JJ
I volume NN
O also RB
O compares VBZ
O with IN
I a DT
I very RB
I strong JJ
I 10 CD
I <percent> NN
I growth NN
O in IN
I the DT
I year-ago JJ
I quarter NN
O <period> <period>
I Coca-Cola NNP
I Enterprises NNPS
O blamed VBD
I the DT
I lower JJR
I volume NN
O on IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I soft-drink NN
I prices NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O were VBD
O about IN
O 3 CD
O <percent> NN
O higher JJR
O in IN
I the DT
I third JJ
I quarter NN
O <period> <period>
I Consumers NNS
O have VBP
O been VBN
O accustomed VBN
O to TO
O buying VBG
I soft-drinks NNS
O at IN
I discounted VBN
I prices NNS
O for IN
I several JJ
I years NNS
O <period> <period>
I Coca-Cola NNP
I Enterprises NNPS
O said VBD
I it PRP
O had VBD
O to TO
O boost VB
I spending NN
O for IN
I trade NN
I and CC
I dealer NN
I incentives NNS
O to TO
O try VB
O to TO
O keep VB
I volumes NNS
O from IN
O slipping VBG
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I company NN
O said VBD
I it PRP
O expects VBZ
I consumers NNS
O will MD
O adjust VB
O to TO
I higher-priced JJ
I soft JJ
I drinks NNS
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I spokesman NN
O attributed VBD
I the DT
I bulk NN
O of IN
I a DT
I 14 CD
I <percent> NN
I increase NN
O in IN
I selling VBG
I <comma> <comma>
I administrative JJ
I and CC
I general JJ
I expenses NNS
O -- =colon=
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 324<period>9 CD
I million CD
O -- =colon=
O to TO
I marketing NN
I costs NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I They PRP
O <apost>re VBP
O out IN
I there RB
O promoting VBG
O like IN
O crazy JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O trying VBG
O to TO
O get VB
I prices NNS
O up IN
O by IN
I promotion NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Roy NNP
I Burry NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I analyst NN
O with IN
I Kidder NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Peabody NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co NNP
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I the DT
I nine CD
I months NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Coca-Cola NNP
I Enterprises NNPS
B <apost> POS
I net NN
O fell VBD
I 31 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 65 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 39 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 93<period>8 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 63 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <period> <period>
I Revenue NN
O was VBD
O flat JJ
O at IN
I about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>97 CD
I billion CD
O <period> <period>
I Coca-Cola NNP
I Enterprises NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O is VBZ
O 49<percent>-owned JJ
O by IN
I Coca-Cola NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O also RB
O said VBD
I it PRP
O repurchased VBD
I about IN
I 1<period>2 CD
I million CD
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I common JJ
I shares NNS
O during IN
I the DT
I third JJ
I quarter NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I buy-back NN
O is VBZ
I part NN
O of IN
I a DT
I 25-million-share JJ
I repurchase NN
I plan NN
O <comma> <comma>
O under IN
I which WDT
B Coca-Cola NNP
I Enterprises NNPS
O so RB
O far RB
O has VBZ
O acquired VBN
I a DT
I total NN
O of IN
I 9<period>7 CD
I million CD
I shares NNS
O <period> <period>
O Separately RB
O <comma> <comma>
I Purchase NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I N<period>Y<period>-based JJ
I PepsiCo NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
O expected VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I fiscal JJ
I third-quarter JJ
I net NN
O rose VBD
I 11 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 269<period>3 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>02 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 241<period>6 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 91 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <period> <period>
I Sales NNS
O rose VBD
I 25 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 3<period>90 CD
I billion CD
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 3<period>13 CD
I billion CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I year-ago JJ
I quarter NN
B <apost>s POS
I results NNS
O include VBP
I an DT
I after-tax JJ
I charge NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 5<period>9 CD
I million CD
O from IN
I the DT
I sale NN
O of IN
I a DT
I winery NN
O in IN
I Spain NNP
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I composite JJ
I trading NN
O on IN
I the DT
I New NNP
I York NNP
I Stock NNP
I Exchange NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Coca-Cola NNP
I Enterprises NNPS
O closed VBD
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 16<period>375 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O down RB
I 62<period>5 CD
I cents NNS
O <period> <period>
I PepsiCo NNP
O closed VBD
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 58<period>50 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O up IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>375 CD
O <period> <period>
I L<period>J<period> NNP
I Hooker NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O is VBZ
O expected VBN
O to TO
O reach VB
I an DT
I agreement NN
O in IN
I principle NN
B this DT
I week NN
O to TO
O sell VB
I Merksamer NNP
I Jewelers NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O to TO
I management NN
O <comma> <comma>
O say VBP
I executives NNS
O familiar JJ
O with IN
I the DT
I talks NNS
O <period> <period>
I L<period>J<period> NNP
I Hooker NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O based VBN
O in IN
I Atlanta NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O filed VBN
O for IN
I Chapter NN
I 11 CD
I bankruptcy NN
I protection NN
O earlier RBR
I this DT
I year NN
O <period> <period>
O Currently RB
O <comma> <comma>
I its PRP<dollar>
I parent NN
I company NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Hooker NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O of IN
I Sydney NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Australia NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
O being VBG
O managed VBN
O by IN
I a DT
I court-appointed JJ
I liquidator NN
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O is VBZ
O expected VBN
O that IN
I GE NNP
I Capital NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I financial-services NNS
I subsidiary NN
O of IN
I General NNP
I Electric NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O will MD
O provide VB
O much NN
O of IN
I the DT
I funding NN
O for IN
I the DT
I proposed VBN
I leveraged JJ
I buy-out NN
O of IN
I Merksamer NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O based VBN
O in IN
I Sacramento NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Calif NNP
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I spokesman NN
O for IN
I GE NNP
I Capital NNP
O declined VBD
O to TO
O comment VB
O <period> <period>
I GE NNP
I Capital NNP
O has VBZ
I a DT
I working VBG
I relationship NN
O with IN
I L<period>J<period> NNP
I Hooker NNP
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O is VBZ
O providing VBG
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 50 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I emergency NN
I financing NN
O to TO
I the DT
I company NN
O and CC
O has VBZ
O agreed VBN
O to TO
O buy VB
I as RB
I much JJ
O as IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 75 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I receivables NN
O from IN
I B<period> NNP
I Altman NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co<period> NNP
O and CC
I Bonwit NNP
I Teller NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I L<period>J<period> NNP
I Hooker NNP
B <apost>s POS
I two CD
I fully RB
I owned VBN
I department-store NN
I chains NNS
O <period> <period>
I Sam NNP
I Merksamer NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I chief JJ
I executive JJ
I officer NN
O of IN
I the DT
I nationwide JJ
I jewelry NN
I chain NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Sanford NNP
I Sigoloff NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I chief JJ
I executive NN
O of IN
I L<period>J<period> NNP
I Hooker NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I both DT
O declined VBD
O to TO
O comment VB
O <period> <period>
O Currently RB
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Merksamer NNP
O owns VBZ
I 20 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I the DT
I company NN
O <colon> =colon=
I L<period>J<period> NNP
I Hooker NNP
O acquired VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I 80 CD
I <percent> NN
I interest NN
O in IN
I the DT
I firm NN
O in IN
I May NNP
I 1986 CD
O <period> <period>
O At IN
I the DT
I time NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Merksamer NNP
I chain NN
O had VBD
I 11 CD
I stores NNS
O in IN
I operation NN
O <period> <period>
I Today NN
O <comma> <comma>
I there EX
O are VBP
I 77 CD
I units NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I all DT
O located VBN
O in IN
I shopping NN
I malls NNS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I recent JJ
I weeks NNS
B Mr<period> NNP
I Merksamer NNP
O has VBZ
O approached VBN
I a DT
I number NN
O of IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I suppliers NNS
O and CC
O asked VBD
I them PRP
O to TO
O provide VB
I letters NNS
O of IN
I intent NN
O saying VBG
I they PRP
O will MD
O continue VB
O shipping VBG
I merchandise NN
O to TO
I the DT
I chain NN
O following VBG
I the DT
I buy-out NN
O <comma> <comma>
O say VBP
I those DT
O familiar NN
O with IN
I the DT
I situation NN
O <period> <period>
I This DT
I year NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I number NN
O of IN
I retail JJ
I leveraged JJ
I buyouts NNS
O have VBP
O failed VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O causing VBG
I jitters NNS
O among IN
I suppliers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Mr<period> NNP
I Merksamer NNP
O apparently RB
O wanted VBD
I assurances NNS
O that IN
I he PRP
O wo MD
O n<apost>t RB
O have VB
I delivery NN
I problems NNS
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I the DT
I year NN
O ended VBN
I June NNP
I 30 CD
I <comma> <comma>
I 1989 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I Merksamer NNP
I Jewelers NNPS
O had VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 62 CD
I million CD
O of IN
I revenue NN
O and CC
I operating VBG
I profit NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>5 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I jewelery NN
I chain NN
O was VBD
O put VBN
O up IN
O for IN
I sale NN
O in IN
I June NNP
O <period> <period>
O According VBG
O to TO
I those DT
O familiar NN
O with IN
I the DT
I situation NN
O <comma> <comma>
I other JJ
I bidders NNS
O included VBD
I Ratners NNP
I Group NNP
I PLC NNP
O of IN
I London NNP
O and CC
I Kay NNP
I Jewelers NNP
I Inc NNP
O <period> <period>
I First NNP
I Boston NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O is VBZ
O advising VBG
I L<period>J<period> NNP
I Hooker NNP
O on IN
I the DT
I sale NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Merksamer NNP
I business NN
O <period> <period>
I Merksamer NNP
O was VBD
I the DT
I first JJ
O in IN
I a DT
I series NN
O of IN
I retail JJ
I acquisitions NNS
O made VBN
O by IN
I L<period>J<period> NNP
I Hooker NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I company NN
O was VBD
O founded VBN
O in IN
I Sacramento NNP
O in IN
I 1929 CD
O by IN
I two CD
I brothers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Ralph NNP
I and CC
I Walter NNP
I Merksamer NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O operated VBD
O as IN
I DeVon NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Jewelers NNPS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I 1979 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I pair NN
O split NN
I the DT
I company NN
O in IN
I half NN
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I Walter NNP
O and CC
I his PRP<dollar>
I son NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Sam NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O agreeing VBG
O to TO
O operate VB
O under IN
I the DT
I Merksamer NNP
I Jewelery NNP
I name NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I sale NN
O of IN
I Merksamer NNP
I Jewelers NNPS
O is VBZ
O subject NN
O to TO
I approval NN
O by IN
I Judge NNP
I Tina NNP
I Brozman NNP
O of IN
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I Bankruptcy NNP
I Court NNP
O <period> <period>
O As IN
O earlier RBR
O reported VBD
O <comma> <comma>
I L<period>J<period> NNP
I Hooker NNP
B this DT
I week NN
O received VBD
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 409 CD
I million CD
I bid NN
O for IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I three CD
I shopping NN
I malls NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O plus CC
I other JJ
I properties NNS
O from IN
I a DT
I consortium NN
O led VBN
O by IN
I Honolulu NNP
I real-estate NN
I investor NN
I Jay NNP
I Shidler NNP
O and CC
I A<period> NNP
I Boyd NNP
I Simpson NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I Atlanta NNP
I developer NN
O and CC
I former JJ
I L<period>J<period> NNP
I Hooker NNP
I senior JJ
I executive NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I offer NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O did VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O include VB
I the DT
I Merksamer NNP
I chain NN
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
O being VBG
O reviewed VBN
O by IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Sigoloff NNP
O <period> <period>
I Robert NNP
I J<period> NNP
I Regal NNP
O was VBD
O named VBN
I president NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I executive JJ
I officer NN
O of IN
I this DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I Universal-Rundle NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
I unit NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Regal NNP
O had VBD
O been VBN
I president NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I executive NN
O of IN
I RBS NNP
I Industries NNP
I Inc NNP
O <period> <period>
I Robert NNP
I H<period> NNP
I Carlson NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I previous JJ
I president NN
I and CC
I chief JJ
I executive NN
O of IN
I Universal-Rundle NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O will MD
O assume VB
I the DT
I title NN
O of IN
I chairman NN
O of IN
I the DT
I unit NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I vitreous-china NN
I maker NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I days NNS
O may MD
O be VB
O numbered VBN
O for IN
I animated JJ
I shows NNS
O featuring VBG
I Alf NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Karate NNP
I Kid NNP
O and CC
I the DT
I Chipmunks NNPS
O <period> <period>
I NBC NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I leader NN
O in IN
I morning NN
I <comma> <comma>
I prime-time JJ
I and CC
I late JJ
I night NN
I programs NNS
O but CC
I an DT
I also-ran NN
O on IN
I Saturday NNP
I mornings NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O when WRB
I children NNS
O rule VBP
I the DT
I TV NN
I set VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
O contemplating VBG
O getting VBG
O out IN
O of IN
I the DT
I cartoon NN
I business NN
O <period> <period>
O Instead RB
O <comma> <comma>
I network NN
I officials NNS
O say VBP
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O may MD
O <quote> <quote>
O counterprogram VB
O <quote> <quote>
O with IN
I shows VBZ
O for IN
I an DT
I audience NN
B that WDT
O is VBZ
O virtually RB
O ignored VBN
O in IN
I that DT
I time NN
I period NN
O =colon= =colon=
I adults NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I There EX
O is VBZ
I talk VB
O of IN
I some DT
I revamping VBG
O and CC
I we PRP
O <apost>re VBP
O certainly RB
O heading VBG
O in IN
I the DT
I direction NN
O of IN
I less JJR
I and CC
I less JJR
I animation NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Joseph NNP
I S<period> NNP
I Cicero NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I vice NN
I president NN
O of IN
I finance NN
I and CC
I administration NN
O for IN
I National NNP
I Broadcasting NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I unit NN
O of IN
I General NNP
I Electric NNP
I Co NNP
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Cicero NNP
O said VBD
O that IN
I NBC NNP
I Entertainment NNP
I president NNP
I Brandon NNP
I Tartikoff NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O declined VBD
O to TO
O be VB
O interviewed VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
O <quote> <quote>
O looking VBG
O at IN
I options NNS
O now RB
O and CC
O may MD
O put VB
I some DT
I things NNS
O into IN
I the DT
I schedule NN
O by IN
I mid-season NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I He PRP
O declined VBD
O to TO
O elaborate VB
O <period> <period>
I NBC NNP
B <apost>s POS
I options NNS
O could MD
O range VB
O from IN
I news-oriented JJ
I programming NN
O to TO
I sports NNS
I shows VBZ
O <comma> <comma>
O although IN
I the DT
I network NN
O declined VBD
O to TO
O comment VB
O <period> <period>
I One CD
I major JJ
I NBC NNP
I affiliate NN
O <comma> <comma>
I KCRA NNP
O in IN
I Sacramento NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O plans VBZ
O to TO
O cancel VB
I the DT
I NBC NNP
I Saturday NNP
I morning NN
I line-up NN
O as IN
O of IN
I January NNP
O and CC
O replace VB
I it PRP
O with IN
I a DT
I local JJ
I newscast NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I one-hour JJ
I program NN
O will MD
O be VB
O repeated VBN
O with IN
I updates NNS
O throughout IN
I Saturday NNP
I mornings NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O feel VBP
I there EX
O is VBZ
I an DT
I opportunity NN
O for IN
I an DT
I audience NN
B that WDT
O is VBZ
O not RB
O being VBG
O served VBN
O by IN
I any DT
I network NN
O <comma> <comma>
O so IN
I we PRP
O want VBP
O to TO
O take VB
I the DT
I lead NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I KCRA NNP
B <apost>s POS
I general JJ
I manager NN
O <comma> <comma>
I John NNP
I Kueneke NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O need VB
I cartoons NNS
O anymore RB
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O only RB
O accounted VBD
O for IN
I 5 NN
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O at IN
O best JJS
O <comma> <comma>
O of IN
I the DT
I station NN
B <apost>s POS
I total JJ
I revenues NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I An DT
I NBC NNP
I spokesman NN
O says VBZ
I the DT
I network NN
O will MD
O <quote> <quote>
O closely RB
O monitor VB
O <quote> <quote>
I the DT
I Sacramento NNP
I situation NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O says VBZ
I it PRP
O is VBZ
I the DT
I only JJ
I station NN
O to TO
O defect VB
O <period> <period>
I Spokesmen NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I television NN
I networks NNS
O of IN
I CBS NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O and CC
I Capital NNP
I Cities<bslash><fslash>ABC NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O say VBP
I there EX
O are VBP
I no DT
I plans NNS
O to TO
O alter VB
I the DT
I children NNS
B <apost>s POS
I line-up NN
O on IN
I Saturday NNP
I mornings NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I youthful JJ
I audience NN
O for IN
I Saturday NNP
I programming NN
O is VBZ
O no RB
O longer RB
O dependent JJ
O on IN
I the DT
I networks NNS
O <period> <period>
I There EX
O has VBZ
O been VBN
I a DT
I surge NN
O in IN
O syndicated VBN
I children NNS
I <apost>s POS
O shows VBZ
O to TO
I independent JJ
I stations NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O as RB
O well RB
O as IN
I competition NN
O from IN
I videocassettes NNS
O for IN
I kids NNS
O and CC
O from IN
I cable NN
I outlets NNS
O such JJ
O as IN
I Nickelodeon NNP
O and CC
I the DT
I Disney NNP
I Channel NNP
O <period> <period>
O At IN
I the DT
I same JJ
I time NN
O <comma> <comma>
I there EX
O appears VBZ
O to TO
O be VB
I a DT
I market NN
O for IN
I news-oriented JJ
I programming NN
O <colon> =colon=
I Turner NNP
I Broadcasting NNP
I System NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Cable NNP
I News NNP
I Network NNP
O has VBZ
I its PRP<dollar>
I highest JJS
I ratings NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O outside IN
O of IN
I prime JJ
I time NN
O <comma> <comma>
O on IN
I Saturday NNP
I mornings NNS
O <period> <period>
I NBC NNP
O has VBZ
O on IN
I previous JJ
I occasions NNS
O considered VBN
O replacing VBG
I cartoons NNS
O with IN
I a DT
I Saturday NNP
I version NN
O of IN
O <quote> <quote>
I Today NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I which WDT
O is VBZ
O produced VBN
O by IN
I NBC NNP
I News NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I network NN
B <apost>s POS
I own JJ
I production NN
I company NN
O <comma> <comma>
I NBC NNP
I Productions NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
O supplies VBZ
I a DT
I half-hour NN
I family-oriented JJ
I show NN
O titled VBN
O <quote> <quote>
O Saved NNP
O By IN
I The DT
I Bell NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I NBC NNP
I Productions NNPS
O or CC
I NBC NNP
I News NNP
O could MD
O supply VB
I the DT
I network NN
O with IN
I other JJ
I Saturday NNP
I morning NN
I shows VBZ
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I move NN
B that WDT
O would MD
O control VB
I costs NNS
O <period> <period>
I Animated JJ
I shows NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O are VBP
O made VBN
O by IN
I outside IN
I production NN
I companies NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O cost NN
I the DT
I network NN
B about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 300<comma>000 CD
O per IN
I episode NN
O <period> <period>
I Rohm NNP
I <amp> CC
I Haas NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O said VBD
I third-quarter JJ
I net JJ
I income NN
O skidded VBD
I 35 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 32<period>6 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 49 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I the DT
I year-earlier JJ
I quarter NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I chemicals NNS
I company NN
O had VBD
I net NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 49<period>8 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 75 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <period> <period>
I Sales NNS
O were VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 623 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O up IN
I 0<period>5 CD
I <percent> NN
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 619<period>8 CD
I million CD
B a DT
I year NN
O ago RB
O <period> <period>
I Rohm NNP
I <amp> CC
I Haas NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O plans VBZ
O to TO
O start VB
O operating VBG
I seven CD
I new JJ
I production NN
I units NNS
B this DT
I year NN
O <comma> <comma>
O attributed VBD
I the DT
I profit NN
I slide NN
O partly RB
O to TO
I higher JJR
I start-up JJ
I expense NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I company NN
O also RB
O cited VBD
I the DT
I stronger JJR
I dollar NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O cuts VBZ
I the DT
I value NN
O of IN
I overseas JJ
I profit NN
O when WRB
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O translated VBN
O into IN
I dollars NNS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I addition NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I company NN
O said VBD
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O was VBD
O hurt VBN
O by IN
I higher JJR
I than IN
I previous-year JJ
I costs NNS
O for IN
I raw JJ
I materials NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O though IN
I those DT
I costs NNS
O have VBP
O declined VBN
O since IN
I the DT
I second JJ
I quarter NN
O <period> <period>
I Incrementally RB
I higher JJR
I production NN
O of IN
I those DT
I chemicals NNS
B which WDT
O remain VBP
O in IN
I heavy JJ
I demand NN
O also RB
O has VBZ
O forced VBN
O up IN
I costs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O such JJ
O as IN
I overtime NN
I pay NN
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I the DT
I nine CD
I months NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Rohm NNP
I <amp> CC
I Haas NNP
I net NN
O totaled VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 155 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>33 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O down RB
I 17 CD
I <percent> NN
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 187<period>8 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>82 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I year NN
O ago RB
O <period> <period>
I Sales NNS
O rose VBD
I 5<period>2 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>04 CD
I billion CD
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>94 CD
I billion CD
B the DT
I previous JJ
I year NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I New NNP
I York NNP
I Stock NNP
I Exchange NNP
I composite JJ
I trading NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Rohm NNP
I <amp> CC
I Haas NNP
O closed VBD
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 33 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O down RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>75 CD
O <period> <period>
I Michael NNP
I A<period> NNP
I Gaskin NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 55 NN
I years NNS
O old JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
O named VBN
I president NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I executive JJ
I officer NN
O of IN
I this DT
I manufacturer NN
O of IN
I industrial JJ
I robots NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O succeeding VBG
I Walter NNP
I K<period> NNP
I Weisel NNP
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Weisel NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 49 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O resigned VBD
O as IN
I president NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I executive NN
O and CC
O will MD
O work VB
O on IN
I special JJ
I projects NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I John NNP
I J<period> NNP
I Wallace NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I chairman NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Gaskin NNP
O formerly RB
O was VBD
I president NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I executive NN
O of IN
I Taylor NNP
I <amp> CC
I Gaskin NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O and CC
O was VBD
I a DT
I director NN
O of IN
I Prab NNP
I Robots NNP
O since IN
I 1985 CD
O <period> <period>
I Stephen NNP
I N<period> NNP
I Wertheimer NNP
O was VBD
O named VBN
I managing VBG
I director NN
O and CC
I group NN
I head NN
O of IN
I investment NN
I banking NN
O in IN
I Asia NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O based VBN
O in IN
I Tokyo NNP
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Wertheimer NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 38 CD
I years NNS
O old JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O had VBD
O been VBN
I a DT
I first JJ
I vice NN
I president NN
O in IN
I the DT
I industrial JJ
I group NN
O in IN
I investment NN
I banking NN
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O succeeds VBZ
I Everett NNP
I Meyers NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O resigned VBD
O in IN
I May NNP
O <period> <period>
I This DT
O is VBZ
O written VBN
O to TO
O correct VB
I a DT
I misquotation NN
O in IN
I your PRP<dollar>
I Oct<period> NNP
I 3 CD
I article NN
O <quote> <quote>
I Deaths NNP
O From IN
I Advanced NNP
I Colon NNP
I Cancer NNP
O Can MD
O Be VB
O Reduced NNP
O by IN
O Using VBG
I Two CD
I Drugs NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O In IN
I this DT
I article NN
O <comma> <comma>
I I PRP
O was VBD
O alleged VBN
O to TO
O have VB
O said VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Any DT
I patient NN
O with IN
I high-risk JJ
I colon NN
I cancer NN
O is VBZ
O really RB
O getting VBG
I short JJ
I shrift NN
O if IN
I he PRP
O <apost>s VBZ
O not RB
O getting VBG
I this DT
I therapy NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O did VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O say VB
I this DT
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I I PRP
O <apost>m VBP
O totally RB
O opposed VBN
O to TO
I the DT
I philosophy NN
O expressed VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I quote NN
O <period> <period>
I I PRP
O have VBP
O not RB
O offered VBN
O and CC
O will MD
O not RB
O offer VB
I routine JJ
I therapy NN
O with IN
I the DT
I two CD
I drugs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I levamisole NN
I and CC
I 5-fluorouracil JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I any DT
O of IN
I my PRP<dollar>
I colon-cancer NN
I patients NNS
O <period> <period>
O With IN
I this DT
I treatment NN
B we PRP
O have VBP
O reduced VBN
I deaths NNS
O in IN
I high-risk JJ
I colon NN
I cancer NN
O by IN
I one-third NN
O -- =colon=
O but CC
I this DT
O leaves VBZ
I the DT
I two-thirds NNS
B who WP
O are VBP
O dying VBG
O of IN
I cancer NN
O <period> <period>
I This DT
O is VBZ
O not RB
O nearly RB
O good JJ
O enough RB
O <period> <period>
I I PRP
O believe VBP
I any DT
I physician NN
B who WP
O truly RB
O cares VBZ
O about IN
I cancer NN
I patients NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I both DT
I today NN
I and CC
I tomorrow NN
O <comma> <comma>
O should MD
O offer VB
I the DT
I hope NN
O of IN
I something NN
O better JJR
O than IN
I that DT
O <period> <period>
I My PRP<dollar>
I statement NN
O <comma> <comma>
O read VB
O verbatim RB
O from IN
I a DT
I printed VBN
I text NN
O available JJ
O to TO
I all DT
I reporters NNS
O attending VBG
I the DT
I National NNP
I Cancer NNP
I Institute NNP
I news NN
I conference NN
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
I the DT
I following VBG
O =colon= =colon=
O <quote> <quote>
I New NNP
I clinical JJ
I trials NNS
O are VBP
O already RB
O in IN
I operation NN
O seeking VBG
O to TO
O improve VB
I these DT
I results NNS
O <period> <period>
I These DT
I research NN
I protocols NNS
O offer VBP
O to TO
I the DT
I patient NN
O not RB
O only RB
I the DT
I very RB
I best JJS
I therapy NN
B which WDT
B we PRP
O have VBP
O established VBN
I today NN
O but CC
O also RB
I the DT
I hope NN
O of IN
I something NN
O still RB
O better JJR
O <period> <period>
I I PRP
O feel VBP
I any DT
I patient NN
O with IN
I high-risk JJ
I cancer NN
O is VBZ
O getting VBG
I short JJ
I shrift NN
O if IN
I he PRP
O is VBZ
O not RB
O offered VBN
I this DT
I opportunity NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O have VBP
I very RB
I exciting JJ
I prospects NNS
O for IN
I far RB
I more RBR
I impressive JJ
I advances NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I treatment NN
O of IN
I colon NN
I cancer NN
O during IN
I the DT
I years NNS
O immediately RB
O ahead RB
O <period> <period>
I This DT
I hope NN
O <comma> <comma>
O however RB
O <comma> <comma>
O will MD
O never RB
O be VB
O realized VBN
O if IN
I we PRP
O use VBP
I levamisole NN
I and CC
I 5-fluorouracil JJ
O as IN
I a DT
I stopping VBG
I point NN
O <period> <period>
I Charles NNP
I G<period> NNP
I Moertel NNP
I M<period>D NNP
I <period> <period>
B Mayo NNP
I Clinic NNP
B Rochester NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Minn NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I oil NN
I and CC
I auto NN
I industries NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O united VBN
O in IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I dislike NN
O of IN
I President NNP
I Bush NNP
B <apost>s POS
I proposal NN
O for IN
I cars NNS
B that WDT
O run VBP
O on IN
I alternative NN
I fuels NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O announced VBD
I a DT
I joint JJ
I research NN
I program NN
B that WDT
O could MD
O turn VB
O up IN
I a DT
I cleaner-burning JJ
I gasoline NN
O <period> <period>
I Officials NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I Big NNP
I Three CD
I auto NN
I makers NNS
O and CC
I 14 CD
I petroleum NN
I companies NNS
O said VBD
I they PRP
O are VBP
O setting VBG
O out IN
O to TO
O find VB
I the DT
I most RBS
I cost-effective JJ
I fuel NN
O for IN
O reducing VBG
I cities NNS
B <apost> POS
I air-pollution NN
I problems NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I no DT
I bias NN
O toward IN
I any DT
I fuel NN
O in IN
I particular NN
O <period> <period>
O However RB
O <comma> <comma>
I their PRP<dollar>
I search NN
O notably RB
O wo MD
O n<apost>t RB
O include VB
I natural JJ
I gas NN
O or CC
I pure JJ
I methanol NN
O -- =colon=
I the DT
I two CD
I front-running JJ
I alternative NN
I fuels NNS
O -- =colon=
O in IN
I tests NNS
O to TO
O be VB
O completed VBN
O by IN
I next JJ
I summer NN
O <period> <period>
O Instead RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I tests NNS
O will MD
O focus VB
O heavily RB
O on IN
I new JJ
I blends NNS
O of IN
I gasoline NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O are VBP
O still RB
O undeveloped JJ
O but CC
I which WDT
B the DT
I petroleum NN
I industry NN
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O touting VBG
O as IN
I a DT
I solution NN
O for IN
I automobile NN
I pollution NN
B that WDT
O is VBZ
O choking VBG
I urban JJ
I areas NNS
O <period> <period>
I Environmentalists NNS
O criticized VBD
I the DT
I program NN
O as IN
I merely RB
I a DT
I public-relations NNS
I attempt VBP
O to TO
O head VB
O off IN
I a DT
I White NNP
I House NNP
I proposal NN
O to TO
O require VB
I a DT
I million CD
I cars NNS
B a DT
I year NN
B that WDT
O run VBP
O on IN
I cleaner-burning JJ
I fuels NNS
O by IN
I 1997 CD
O <period> <period>
O While IN
I major JJ
I oil NN
I companies NNS
O have VBP
O been VBN
O experimenting VBG
O with IN
I cleaner-burning JJ
I gasoline NN
I blends NNS
O for IN
I years NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I only RB
I Atlantic NNP
I Richfield NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O is VBZ
O now RB
O marketing VBG
I a DT
I lower-emission NN
I gasoline NN
O for IN
I older JJR
I cars NNS
O currently RB
O running VBG
O on IN
I leaded JJ
I fuel NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I initial JJ
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 11 CD
I million CD
I research NN
I program NN
O will MD
O conduct VB
I the DT
I most RBS
I extensive JJ
I testing NN
O to TO
I date VB
O of IN
I reformulated VBN
I gasolines NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I Joe NNP
I Colucci NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I head NN
O of IN
I fuels NNS
I and CC
I lubricants NNS
O at IN
I General NNP
I Motors NNPS
I Corp<period> NNP
I research NN
I laboratories NNS
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O will MD
O compare VB
I 21 CD
I different JJ
I blends NNS
O of IN
I gasolines NNS
O with IN
I three CD
I mixtures NNS
O of IN
I up IN
I to TO
I 85 CD
I <percent> NN
I methanol NN
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I second JJ
I phase NN
O of IN
I research NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O is VBZ
O still RB
O being VBG
O planned VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O will MD
O test VB
I reformulated VBN
I gasolines NNS
O on IN
I newer JJR
I engine NN
I technologies NNS
O now RB
O being VBG
O developed VBN
O for IN
I use NN
O in IN
I 1992 CD
I or CC
I 1993 CD
I cars NNS
O <period> <period>
I There EX
O was VBD
I no DT
I cost NN
I estimate NN
O for IN
I the DT
I second JJ
I phase NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I whole JJ
I idea NN
I here RB
O is VBZ
I the DT
I automobile NN
I and CC
I oil NN
I companies NNS
O have VBP
I joint JJ
I customers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Keith NNP
I McHenry NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I senior JJ
I vice NN
I president NN
O of IN
I technology NN
O at IN
I Amoco NNP
I Corp NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O And CC
I we PRP
O are VBP
O looking VBG
O for IN
I the DT
I most RBS
I cost-effective JJ
I way NN
O to TO
O clean VB
O up IN
I the DT
I air NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O But CC
I David NNP
I Hawkins NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I environmental JJ
I lawyer NN
O with IN
I the DT
I Natural NNP
I Resources NNP
I Defense NNP
I Council NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I the DT
I research NN
O appears VBZ
O merely RB
O to TO
O be VB
I a DT
I way NN
O to TO
O promote VB
I reformulated VBN
I gasoline NN
O <period> <period>
I Oil NNP
I and CC
I auto NN
I companies NNS
O supported VBD
I a DT
I move NN
O on IN
I Capitol NNP
I Hill NNP
B last JJ
I week NN
O to TO
O gut VB
I Mr<period> NNP
I Bush NNP
B <apost>s POS
I plans NNS
O to TO
O require VB
I auto NN
I makers NNS
O to TO
O begin VB
O selling VBG
I alternative-fueled JJ
I cars NNS
O by IN
I 1995 CD
O <period> <period>
O Instead RB
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I House NNP
I subcommittee NN
O adopted VBD
I a DT
I clean-fuels NNS
I program VBP
B that WDT
O specifically RB
O mentions VBZ
I reformulated VBN
I gasoline NN
O as IN
I an DT
I alternative NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Bush NNP
I administration NN
O has VBZ
O said VBD
I it PRP
O will MD
O try VB
O to TO
O resurrect VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I plan NN
O when WRB
I the DT
I House NNP
I Energy NNP
I and CC
I Commerce NNP
I Committee NNP
O takes VBZ
O up IN
I a DT
I comprehensive JJ
I clean-air JJ
I bill NN
O <period> <period>
I William NNP
I Seidman NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I chairman NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Federal NNP
I Deposit NNP
I Insurance NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I Lincoln NNP
I Savings NNP
I <amp> CC
I Loan NNP
I Association NNP
O should MD
O have VB
O been VBN
O seized VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I government NN
O in IN
I 1986 CD
O to TO
O contain VB
I losses NNS
B that IN
B he PRP
O estimated VBD
O will MD
O cost VB
I taxpayers NNS
B as RB
I much JJ
I as IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2 CD
I billion CD
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Seidman NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O has VBZ
O been VBN
I the DT
I nation NN
B <apost>s POS
I top JJ
I bank NN
I regulator NN
O <comma> <comma>
O inherited VBD
I the DT
I problems NNS
O of IN
I Lincoln NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O based VBN
O in IN
I Irvine NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Calif<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O after IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I regulatory JJ
I role NN
O was VBD
O expanded VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I new JJ
I savings-and-loan JJ
I bailout NN
I law NN
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O made VBD
I his PRP<dollar>
I comments NNS
O before IN
I House NNP
I Banking NNP
I Committee NNP
I hearings NNS
O to TO
O investigate VB
I what WP
O appears VBZ
O to TO
O be VB
I the DT
I biggest JJS
I thrift NN
I disaster NN
O in IN
I a DT
I scandal-ridden JJ
I industry NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I inquiry NN
O also RB
O will MD
O cover VB
I the DT
I actions NNS
O of IN
I Charles NNP
I Keating NNP
I Jr<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O is VBZ
I chairman NN
O of IN
I American NNP
I Continental NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Lincoln NNP
B <apost>s POS
I parent NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I who WP
O contributed VBD
O heavily RB
O to TO
I several JJ
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I senators NNS
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Seidman NNP
O told VBD
I the DT
I committee NN
O that IN
I the DT
I Resolution NNP
I Trust NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I agency NN
O created VBN
O to TO
O sell VB
I sick JJ
I thrifts NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O has VBZ
O studied VBN
I Lincoln NNP
B <apost>s POS
I examination NN
I reports NNS
O by IN
I former JJ
I regulators NNS
O dating VBG
O back RB
O to TO
I 1986 CD
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I My PRP<dollar>
I staff NN
O indicated VBD
O that WDT
O had VBD
I we PRP
O made VBD
I such JJ
I findings NNS
O in IN
I one CD
O of IN
I our PRP<dollar>
I own JJ
I institutions NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I we PRP
O would MD
O have VB
O sought VBN
I an DT
I immediate JJ
I cease-and-desist JJ
I order NN
O to TO
O stop VB
I the DT
I hazardous JJ
I operations NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Seidman NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O When WRB
I Lincoln NNP
O was VBD
O seized VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I government NN
O <comma> <comma>
O for IN
I example NN
O <comma> <comma>
I 15 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I loans NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 250 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O were VBD
O to TO
I borrowers NNS
B who WP
O were VBD
O buying VBG
I real JJ
I estate NN
O from IN
I one CD
O of IN
I American NNP
I Continental NNP
B <apost>s POS
I 50 CD
I other JJ
I subsidiaries NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I Mr<period> NNP
I Seidman NNP
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I the DT
I government NN
O did VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O step VB
O in IN
O until IN
I six CD
I months NNS
O ago RB
O <comma> <comma>
O when WRB
I thrift NN
I officials NNS
O put VBP
I Lincoln NNP
O into IN
I conservatorship NN
O -- =colon=
I the DT
I day NN
O after IN
I American NNP
I Continental NNP
O filed VBD
O for IN
I Chapter NN
I 11 CD
I bankruptcy NN
I protection NN
O from IN
I creditors NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I bankruptcy NN
I filing NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I government NN
O has VBZ
O charged VBN
O in IN
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>1 CD
I billion CD
I civil JJ
I lawsuit NN
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
I part NN
O of IN
I a DT
I pattern NN
O to TO
O shift VB
I insured VBN
I deposits NNS
O to TO
I the DT
I parent NN
I company NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O used VBD
I the DT
I deposits NNS
O as IN
I a DT
I cache NN
O for IN
I real-estate NN
I deals NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I deposits NNS
B that WDT
O have VBP
O been VBN
O transferred VBN
O to TO
I other JJ
I subsidiaries NNS
O are VBP
O now RB
O under IN
I the DT
I jurisdiction NN
O of IN
I the DT
I bankruptcy NN
I court NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O think VBP
I it PRP
O <apost>s VBZ
O fairly RB
O clear JJ
O <lparen> <lparen>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Keating NNP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O knew VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O that IN
I regulators NNS
O were VBD
O set VBN
O to TO
O seize VB
I Lincoln NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Seidman NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Further JJ
I investigation NN
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O said VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O may MD
O result VB
O in IN
I further JJ
I actions NNS
O against IN
I Lincoln NNP
B <apost>s POS
I executives NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Seidman NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O including VBG
I fraud NN
I actions NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Keating NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O for IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I part NN
O <comma> <comma>
O has VBZ
O filed VBN
I suit NN
O alleging VBG
O that IN
I regulators NNS
O unlawfully RB
O seized VBN
I the DT
I thrift NN
O <period> <period>
I Leonard NNP
I Bickwit NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I attorney NN
O in IN
I Washington NNP
O for IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Keating NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O declined VBD
O to TO
O comment VB
O on IN
I the DT
I hearings NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O except VB
O to TO
O say VB
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O will MD
O be VB
O responding VBG
O comprehensively RB
O in IN
I several JJ
I forums NNS
O to TO
I each DT
O of IN
I these DT
I allegations NNS
O at IN
I the DT
I appropriate JJ
I time NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Lincoln NNP
B <apost>s POS
I treatment NN
O by IN
I former JJ
I thrift NN
I regulators NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I an DT
I agency NN
O disbanded VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I new JJ
I law NN
O <comma> <comma>
O has VBZ
O proved VBN
O embarrassing JJ
O for IN
I five CD
I senators NNS
B who WP
O received VBD
I thousands NNS
O of IN
I dollars NNS
O in IN
I campaign NN
I contributions NNS
O from IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Keating NNP
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Seidman NNP
O said VBD
I yesterday NN
O <comma> <comma>
O for IN
I example NN
O <comma> <comma>
O that IN
I Sen<period> NNP
I Dennis NNP
I DeConcini NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I D<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Ariz<period> NNP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O received VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 48<comma>100 CD
O in IN
I contributions NNS
O from IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Keating NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O phoned VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Seidman NNP
O to TO
O request VB
O that IN
I he PRP
O push VBP
O for IN
I a DT
I sale NN
O of IN
I Lincoln NNP
O before IN
I it PRP
O would MD
O be VB
O seized VBN
O <period> <period>
O After IN
I the DT
I government NN
I lawsuit NN
O was VBD
O filed VBN
O against IN
I Lincoln NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Sen<period> NNP
I DeConcini NNP
O returned VBD
I the DT
I campaign NN
I contributions NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I senator NN
B <apost>s POS
I spokesman NN
O said VBD
I yesterday NN
O that IN
I he PRP
O pushed VBD
O for IN
I the DT
I sale NN
O of IN
I Lincoln NNP
O because IN
O <quote> <quote>
I hundreds NNS
O of IN
I Arizona NNP
I jobs NNS
O <lparen> <lparen>
O at IN
I Lincoln NNP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O were VBD
O on IN
I the DT
I line NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Senate NNP
I Banking NNP
I Committee NNP
I Chairman NNP
I Donald NNP
I Riegle NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I D<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Mich NNP
I <period> <period>
O <rparen> <rparen>
O has VBZ
O also RB
O returned VBN
I contributions NNS
B he PRP
O received VBD
O from IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Keating NNP
B a DT
I year NN
O ago RB
O <period> <period>
O Sens<period> NNP
O John NNP
O Glenn NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I D<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Ohio NNP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O <comma> <comma>
O John NNP
O McCain NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O <lparen> <lparen>
I R<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Ariz<period> NNP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O and CC
O Alan NNP
O Cranston NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I D<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Calif<period> NNP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O also RB
O received VBD
I substantial JJ
I contributions NNS
O from IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Keating NNP
O and CC
O sought VBD
O to TO
O intervene VB
O on IN
I behalf NN
O of IN
I Lincoln NNP
O <period> <period>
I House NNP
I Banking NNP
I Committee NNP
I Chairman NNP
I Henry NNP
I Gonzalez NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I D<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Texas NNP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O said VBD
I Sen<period> NNP
I Cranston NNP
O volunteered VBD
O to TO
O appear VB
O before IN
I the DT
I House NNP
I committee NN
O <comma> <comma>
O if IN
O necessary JJ
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I a DT
I committee NN
I staff NN
I member NN
O said VBD
I the DT
I panel NN
O is VBZ
O unlikely JJ
O to TO
O pursue VB
O closely RB
I the DT
I role NN
O of IN
I the DT
I senators NNS
O <period> <period>
O At IN
I the DT
I hearing NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Seidman NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I RTC NNP
O has VBZ
O already RB
O pumped VBN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 729 CD
I million CD
O into IN
I Lincoln NNP
O for IN
I liquidity NN
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O also RB
O held VBD
O out IN
I little JJ
I hope NN
O of IN
I restitution NN
O for IN
I purchasers NNS
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 225 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I American NNP
I Continental NNP
I subordinated VBD
I debt NN
O <period> <period>
I Some DT
O of IN
I those DT
I debtholders NNS
O have VBP
O filed VBN
I a DT
I suit NN
O <comma> <comma>
O saying VBG
I they PRP
O believed VBD
I they PRP
O were VBD
O buying VBG
I government-insured JJ
I certificates NNS
O of IN
I deposit NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O have VBP
I no DT
I plans NNS
O at IN
I this DT
I time NN
O to TO
O pay VB
O off IN
I those DT
I notes NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Eastern NNP
I Airlines NNPS
B <apost> POS
I creditors NNS
I committee NN
O <comma> <comma>
O unhappy JJ
O with IN
I the DT
I carrier NN
B <apost>s POS
I plans NNS
O for IN
O emerging VBG
O from IN
I bankruptcy-law NN
I proceedings NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O asked VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I own JJ
I experts NNS
O to TO
O devise VB
I alternate JJ
I approaches NNS
O to TO
I a DT
I reorganization NN
O <period> <period>
I Representatives NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I accounting NN
I firm NN
O of IN
I Ernst NNP
I <amp> CC
I Young NNP
O and CC
I the DT
I securities NNS
I firm NN
O of IN
I Goldman NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Sachs NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O hired VBN
O by IN
I creditors NNS
O to TO
O consult VB
O on IN
I Eastern NNP
B <apost>s POS
I financial JJ
I plans NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O told VBD
I the DT
I committee NN
O in IN
I a DT
I private JJ
I meeting NN
B yesterday NN
O that IN
I Eastern NNP
B <apost>s POS
I latest JJS
I plan NN
O to TO
O emerge VB
O from IN
I bankruptcy-law NN
I protection NN
O is VBZ
O far RB
O riskier JJR
O than IN
I an DT
I earlier RBR
I one CD
B which WDT
O won VBD
I the DT
I creditors NNS
B <apost> POS
I approval NN
O <period> <period>
O According VBG
O to TO
I one CD
I person NN
O present JJ
O at IN
I the DT
I meeting NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Eastern NNP
B <apost>s POS
I new JJ
I plan NN
O is VBZ
O financially RB
O <quote> <quote>
O overly RB
O optimistic JJ
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Asked VBN
O about IN
I the DT
I consultants NNS
B <apost> POS
I reports NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I Eastern NNP
I spokeswoman NN
O said VBD
O <quote> <quote>
I we PRP
O totally RB
O disagree VBP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I She PRP
O said VBD
I they PRP
O have VBP
O <quote> <quote>
O oversimplified VBN
O and CC
O made VBD
I some DT
I erroneous JJ
I assumptions NNS
B that WDT
O make VBP
I their PRP<dollar>
I analysis NN
O completely RB
O off-base JJ
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O At IN
I a DT
I later JJ
I news NN
I conference NN
I here RB
O <comma> <comma>
I Frank NNP
I Lorenzo NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I chairman NN
O of IN
I Eastern NNP
B <apost>s POS
I parent NN
I Texas NNP
I Air NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I Eastern NNP
O was VBD
O exceeding VBG
I its PRP<dollar>
I goals NNS
O for IN
O getting VBG
O back RB
O into IN
I operation NN
O and CC
O predicted VBD
I it PRP
O would MD
O emerge VB
O from IN
I Chapter NN
I 11 CD
I protection NN
O from IN
I creditors NNS
B early JJ
I next JJ
I year NN
O <comma> <comma>
O operating VBG
O with IN
I more JJR
I service NN
O than IN
I it PRP
O originally RB
O had VBD
O scheduled VBN
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O insisted VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
I he PRP
O has VBZ
O before RB
O <comma> <comma>
O that IN
I creditors NNS
O would MD
O be VB
O paid VBN
O in IN
O full JJ
O under IN
I the DT
I plan NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Lorenzo NNP
O made VBD
I no DT
I mention NN
O of IN
I creditors NNS
B <apost> POS
I negative JJ
I response NN
O to TO
I his PRP<dollar>
I plan NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O <apost>re VBP
O in IN
I the DT
I process NN
O of IN
O discussing VBG
I an DT
I amended VBN
I plan NN
O with IN
I the DT
I creditors NNS
O and CC
O anticipate VB
O filing NN
I that WDT
I amended VBD
I plan NN
O shortly RB
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Lorenzo NNP
O told VBD
I reporters NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O <apost>re VBP
O meeting VBG
O and CC
O surpassing VBG
I our PRP<dollar>
I goals NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O added VBD
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I July NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Eastern NNP
O and CC
I its PRP<dollar>
I creditors NNS
O agreed VBD
O on IN
I a DT
I reorganization NN
I plan NN
B that WDT
O called VBD
O for IN
I Eastern NNP
O to TO
O sell VB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>8 CD
I billion CD
O in IN
I assets NNS
O and CC
O to TO
O emerge VB
O from IN
I bankruptcy-law NN
I protection NN
O at IN
I two-thirds NNS
I its PRP<dollar>
I former JJ
I size NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
O after IN
O selling VBG
O off IN
I pieces NNS
O such JJ
O as IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I East NNP
I Coast NNP
I shuttle NN
O <comma> <comma>
I its PRP<dollar>
I Philadelphia NNP
I hub NN
O and CC
I various JJ
I planes NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Eastern NNP
O hit VBD
I a DT
I stumbling VBG
I block NN
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O could MD
O n<apost>t RB
O sell VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I South JJ
I American JJ
I routes NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I one CD
O of IN
I the DT
I major JJ
I assets NNS
O marked VBN
O for IN
I disposal NN
O <period> <period>
I Those DT
I routes NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O valued VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I creditors NNS
B <apost> POS
I professionals NNS
O at IN
I about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 400 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O were VBD
O to TO
O be VB
O sold VBN
O to TO
I AMR NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
B <apost>s POS
I American NNP
I Airlines NNPS
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I last-minute JJ
I snag NN
O in IN
I negotiations NNS
O with IN
I AMR NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O over IN
I an DT
I unrelated JJ
I lawsuit NN
O between IN
I American NNP
O and CC
I another DT
I Texas NNP
I Air NNP
I unit NN
O <comma> <comma>
O caused VBD
I the DT
I deal NN
O to TO
O collapse VB
O <period> <period>
I Eastern NNP
O ultimately RB
O decided VBD
I it PRP
O would MD
O have VB
O to TO
O keep VB
O and CC
O operate VB
I the DT
I routes NNS
B itself PRP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O would MD
O leave VB
I it PRP
O with IN
I less JJR
I cash NN
O for IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I reorganization NN
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O also RB
O would MD
O leave VB
I Eastern NNP
B a DT
I bigger JJR
I carrier NN
O than IN
I the DT
I scaled-down JJ
I one CD
O proposed VBN
O under IN
I the DT
I initial JJ
I plan NN
O <period> <period>
I Those DT
I changes NNS
O in IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I condition NN
O meant VBD
I the DT
I reorganization NN
I plan NN
O previously RB
O presented VBD
O to TO
I creditors NNS
O would MD
O have VB
O to TO
O be VB
O revamped VBN
O <period> <period>
O Since IN
I then RB
O <comma> <comma>
I Eastern NNP
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O negotiating VBG
O with IN
I creditors NNS
O over IN
I revisions NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I the DT
I creditors NNS
I committee NN
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O having VBG
I problems NNS
O with IN
I the DT
I revisions NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I committee NN
O has VBZ
I two CD
I groups NNS
O of IN
I experts NNS
B it PRP
O calls VBZ
O on IN
O to TO
O analyze VB
I Eastern NNP
B <apost>s POS
I plans NNS
O <period> <period>
I Both DT
O said VBD
I the DT
I new JJ
I plan NN
O would MD
O n<apost>t RB
O work VB
O <period> <period>
I Ernst NNP
I <amp> CC
I Young NNP
O said VBD
I Eastern NNP
B <apost>s POS
I plans NNS
O will MD
O miss VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I projections NNS
O of IN
I earnings NNS
O before IN
I interest NN
I <comma> <comma>
I tax NN
I and CC
I depreciation NN
O by IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 100 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O that IN
I Eastern NNP
B <apost>s POS
I plan NN
O presented VBD
I no DT
I comfort NN
I level NN
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I a DT
I source NN
O present JJ
O at IN
I yesterday NN
B <apost>s POS
I session NN
O <period> <period>
I Experts NNS
O from IN
I Goldman NNP
I Sachs NNP
O estimated VBD
I Eastern NNP
O would MD
O miss VB
I the DT
I same JJ
I mark NN
O by IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 120 CD
I million CD
I to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 135 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I source NN
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I experts NNS
O said VBD
I they PRP
O expected VBD
I Eastern NNP
O would MD
O have VB
O to TO
O issue VB
I new JJ
I debt NN
O to TO
O cover VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I costs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O that IN
I it PRP
O would MD
O generate VB
I far RB
I less JJR
I cash NN
O than IN
O anticipated VBN
O <period> <period>
I Other JJ
I costs NNS
O also RB
O would MD
O increase VB
O <comma> <comma>
O including VBG
I maintenance NN
O <comma> <comma>
O because IN
I Eastern NNP
O has VBZ
I an DT
I older JJR
I fleet NN
O <period> <period>
O At IN
I the DT
I news NN
I conference NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Lorenzo NNP
O and CC
I Eastern NNP
I President NNP
I Phil NNP
I Bakes NNP
O presented VBD
I a DT
I far RB
I rosier JJR
I assessment NN
O <period> <period>
O Flanked VBN
O by IN
I flight NN
I attendants NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I pilots NNS
O and CC
I gate NN
I agents NNS
O dressed VBN
O in IN
I spiffy JJ
I new JJ
I blue JJ
I uniforms NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I they PRP
O said VBD
I Eastern NNP
O has VBZ
O exceeded VBN
I its PRP<dollar>
I operational JJ
I goals NNS
O and CC
O is VBZ
O filling VBG
I its PRP<dollar>
I seats NNS
O <period> <period>
O Starting VBG
I next JJ
I month NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Eastern NNP
O will MD
O begin VB
O flying VBG
I 775 CD
I flights NNS
O daily JJ
O instead RB
O of IN
I the DT
I previously RB
I announced VBN
I 700 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I they PRP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Bakes NNP
O declined VBD
O to TO
O give VB
O out IN
I Eastern NNP
B <apost>s POS
I daily JJ
I losses NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O said VBD
I he PRP
O did VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O expect VB
I Eastern NNP
O would MD
O have VB
O to TO
O dip VB
O into IN
I the DT
I cash NN
O from IN
I asset NN
I sales NNS
O currently RB
O held VBN
O in IN
I escrow NN
O <period> <period>
I These DT
I accounts NNS
O hold VBP
I several JJ
I hundred CD
I million CD
I dollars NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O primarily RB
O from IN
I asset NN
I sales NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I plan NN
B Eastern NNP
O hopes VBZ
O to TO
O pursue VB
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O said VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O calls VBZ
O for IN
I Eastern NNP
O to TO
O have VB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 390 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I cash NN
O by IN
I year NN
B <apost>s POS
I end NN
O <period> <period>
O Both DT
I he PRP
O and CC
I Mr<period> NNP
I Lorenzo NNP
O predicted VBD
I that DT
I plan NN
O might MD
O be VB
O confirmed VBN
O in IN
I January NNP
O <period> <period>
O As IN
O to TO
I negotiations NNS
O with IN
I creditors NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Lorenzo NNP
O said VBD
O in IN
I remarks NNS
O after IN
I the DT
I conference NN
O <quote> <quote>
I we PRP
O <apost>ll MD
O have VB
O to TO
O see VB
O how WRB
I they PRP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I talks NNS
O <rparen> <rparen>
O come VB
O along IN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O However RB
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O added VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I it PRP
O <apost>s VBZ
O not RB
I a DT
I requirement NN
O that IN
I the DT
I plan NN
O be VB
O accepted VBN
O by IN
I creditors NNS
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O must MD
O be VB
O accepted VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I court NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Under IN
I bankruptcy NN
I law NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Eastern NNP
O has VBZ
I exclusive JJ
I rights NNS
O for IN
I a DT
I certain JJ
I period NN
O to TO
O develop VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I own JJ
I reorganization NN
I plan NN
O <period> <period>
I That DT
I deadline NN
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O extended VBN
O once RB
O and CC
O could MD
O be VB
O extended VBN
O again RB
O <period> <period>
O If IN
I Eastern NNP
O can MD
O get VB
I creditor NN
I support NN
O <comma> <comma>
I court NN
I confirmation NN
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I plan NN
O could MD
O be VB
O relatively RB
O swift JJ
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I creditors NNS
O are VBP
O free JJ
O to TO
O press VB
O for IN
I court NN
I approval NN
O of IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I own JJ
I plan NN
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I the DT
I court NN
O could MD
O ignore VB
I both DT
I sides NNS
O and CC
O draw VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I own JJ
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I any DT
I event NN
O <comma> <comma>
I some DT
I people NNS
O familiar JJ
O with IN
I the DT
I case NN
O question NN
O whether IN
I the DT
I court NN
O will MD
O act VB
O by IN
I January NNP
O as IN
O forecast NN
O by IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Lorenzo NNP
O and CC
I Mr<period> NNP
I Bakes NNP
O <period> <period>
I Eastern NNP
O sought VBD
I bankruptcy-law NN
I protection NN
B a DT
I few JJ
I days NNS
O after IN
I a DT
I crippling JJ
I strike NN
O began VBD
I March NNP
I 4 CD
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Lorenzo NNP
O told VBD
I reporters NNS
B the DT
I reorganization NN
B Eastern NNP
O is VBZ
O pursuing VBG
O would MD
O create VB
I a DT
I carrier NN
B 85 CD
I <percent> NN
I to TO
I 90 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I the DT
I size NN
O of IN
I the DT
I pre-bankruptcy NN
I Eastern NNP
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O projected VBD
I it PRP
O would MD
O be VB
O operating VBG
I about IN
I 1<comma>000 CD
I flights NNS
B a DT
I day NN
O by IN
I late JJ
I spring NN
O <comma> <comma>
O only RB
O slightly RB
O fewer JJR
O than IN
I the DT
I carrier NN
B <apost>s POS
I old JJ
I volume NN
O of IN
I 1<comma>050 CD
B a DT
I day NN
O <period> <period>
I HOPES NNS
O OF IN
O SIMPLIFYING VBG
I the DT
I corporate JJ
I minimum JJ
I tax NN
O before IN
I 1990 CD
O are VBP
O weakening VBG
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I method NN
O of IN
O calculating VBG
I the DT
I 20 CD
I <percent> NN
I tax NN
O <comma> <comma>
O paid VBN
O if IN
I it PRP
O exceeds VBZ
I tax NN
O figured VBD
I the DT
I regular JJ
I way NN
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
O due JJ
O for IN
I a DT
I change NN
O in IN
I 1990 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I thanks VBZ
O to TO
I 1986 CD
B <apost>s POS
I tax NN
I act NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I most RBS
I experts NNS
O agree VBP
O that IN
I the DT
I concept NN
B that WDT
O is VBZ
O to TO
O be VB
O introduced VBN
O drags VBZ
O in IN
I great JJ
I complexity NN
O <colon> =colon=
I they PRP
O have VBP
O been VBN
O trying VBG
O to TO
O head VB
I it PRP
O off IN
I this DT
I year NN
O <period> <period>
I Ways NNS
I and CC
I Means NNP
I Chairman NNP
I Rostenkowski NNP
O backed VBD
I a DT
I simplification NN
I plan NN
O in IN
I the DT
I pending VBG
I House NNP
I tax NN
I bill NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I the DT
I plan NN
O turns VBZ
O out IN
O to TO
O be VB
I a DT
I big JJ
I revenue NN
I loser NN
O <period> <period>
O Now RB
I the DT
I Senate NNP
B <apost>s POS
I stripped-down JJ
I bill NN
O omits VBZ
I any DT
I proposal NN
O to TO
O deal VB
O with IN
I the DT
I corporate JJ
I tax NN
O <period> <period>
I Proponents NNS
O of IN
I simplification NN
O fear NN
O that IN
I the DT
I chances NNS
O of IN
O getting VBG
I it PRP
O into IN
I the DT
I final JJ
I bill NN
O are VBP
O waning VBG
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O hear VBP
I it PRP
O has VBZ
I low JJ
I priority NN
O on IN
I the DT
I House NNP
I side NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Samuel NNP
I Starr NNP
O of IN
I Coopers NNP
I <amp> CC
I Lybrand NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I CPAs NNS
O <period> <period>
O If IN
I the DT
I law NN
O is VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O changed VBN
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O says VBZ
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I we PRP
O are VBP
O left VBN
O staring VBG
O at IN
I rules NNS
B that WDT
O are VBP
O almost RB
O impossible JJ
O to TO
O implement VB
O <comma> <comma>
O because IN
I there EX
O are VBP
I so RB
I many JJ
I complex JJ
I depreciation NN
I calculations NNS
O to TO
O do VB
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O But CC
I Congress NNP
O still RB
O could MD
O resolve VB
I the DT
I issue NN
O with IN
I other JJ
I legislation NN
B this DT
I year NN
O or CC
I next JJ
O <comma> <comma>
I Starr NNP
O adds VBZ
O <period> <period>
I HUGO NNP
B <apost>S VBZ
I RAVAGES NNS
O may MD
O be VB
O offset VB
O by IN
I immediate JJ
I claims NNS
O for IN
I tax NN
I refunds NNS
O <period> <period>
I This DT
I law NN
O aids VBZ
I hurricane-wracked JJ
I locales NNS
O named VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I president NN
O as IN
I disaster NN
I areas NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O as RB
O well RB
O as IN
I regions NNS
O so RB
O designated VBN
O after IN
I other JJ
I 1989 CD
I disasters NNS
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O lets VBZ
I victims NNS
O elect VBP
O to TO
O deduct VB
I casualty NN
I losses NNS
O on IN
O either DT
I 1989 CD
O or CC
I amended VBN
I 1988 CD
O returns NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I whichever WDT
O offers VBZ
I the DT
I larger JJR
I tax NN
I benefit NN
O <colon> =colon=
I they PRP
O have VBP
O until IN
I April NNP
I 16 CD
O to TO
O choose VB
O <period> <period>
O Amending VBG
I a DT
I 1988 CD
I return NN
O to TO
O claim VB
I a DT
I refund NN
O brings VBZ
I cash NN
O faster RBR
O <colon> =colon=
O but CC
O for IN
I personal JJ
I losses NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I there EX
O are VBP
I other JJ
I factors NNS
O to TO
O consider VB
O <comma> <comma>
O notes NNS
I publisher NN
I Prentice NNP
I Hall NNP
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I loss NN
O -- =colon=
O after IN
I insurance NN
I recoveries NNS
O -- =colon=
O is VBZ
O deductible JJ
O only RB
O to TO
I the DT
I extent NN
O that IN
I it PRP
O exceeds VBZ
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 100 CD
O and CC
O that IN
I the DT
I year NN
B <apost>s POS
I total JJ
I losses NNS
O exceed VBP
I 10 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I adjusted VBN
I gross JJ
I income NN
O <colon> =colon=
I victims NNS
O may MD
O pick VB
I the DT
I year NN
O when WRB
I income NN
O is VBZ
O lower JJR
O and CC
I deductions NNS
O higher JJR
O <period> <period>
O In IN
O filing VBG
I an DT
I original JJ
I <lparen> <lparen>
I not RB
I amended VBN
I <rparen> <rparen>
I return NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I couple NN
O should MD
O consider VB
O whether IN
I damaged VBN
I property NN
O is VBZ
O owned VBN
O jointly RB
O or CC
O separately RB
O and CC
O whether IN
I one CD
I spouse NN
O has VBZ
I larger JJR
I income NN
O <colon> =colon=
I that WDT
O may MD
O determine VB
O whether IN
I they PRP
O should MD
O file VB
O jointly RB
O or CC
O separately RB
O <period> <period>
I THE DT
I IRS NNP
O DELAYS VBZ
I several JJ
I deadlines NNS
O for IN
I Hugo NNP
B <apost>s POS
I victims NNS
O <period> <period>
I Returns NNS
O for IN
I 1988 CD
O from IN
I people NNS
O with IN
I six-month JJ
I filing NN
I extensions NNS
O were VBD
O due JJ
I Monday NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I the DT
I IRS NNP
O says VBZ
I people NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I disaster NN
I areas NNS
O wo MD
O n<apost>t RB
O be VB
O penalized VBN
O for IN
I late JJ
I filing NN
O if IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I returns NNS
O are VBP
O marked VBN
O <quote> <quote>
I Hugo NNP
O <quote> <quote>
O and CC
O postmarked VBN
O by IN
I Jan<period> NNP
I 16 CD
O <period> <period>
I Interest NN
O will MD
O be VB
O imposed VBN
O on IN
I unpaid JJ
I taxes NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I late-payment NN
I penalties NNS
O on IN
I the DT
I returns NNS
O will MD
O be VB
O waived VBN
O if IN
I the DT
I balance NN
O due JJ
O and CC
O paid VBN
O is VBZ
I 10 CD
I <percent> NN
I or CC
I less JJR
O of IN
I the DT
I liability NN
O <period> <period>
I IRS NNP
I Notice NN
I 89-136 CD
O describes VBZ
I this DT
O and CC
I other JJ
I deadline NN
I relief NN
O for IN
I Hugo NNP
B <apost>s POS
I victims NNS
O <period> <period>
O Among IN
I the DT
I provisions NNS
O =colon= =colon=
I Fiscal-year JJ
I taxpayers NNS
O with IN
I returns NNS
O due JJ
I last JJ
I Monday NNP
O wo MD
O n<apost>t RB
O be VB
O penalized VBN
O if IN
I they PRP
O file VBP
O -- =colon=
O or CC
O request VB
I an DT
I extension NN
O -- =colon=
O and CC
O pay VB
I tax NN
O due JJ
O by IN
I Nov<period> NNP
I 15 CD
O <period> <period>
I Excise-tax JJ
I returns NNS
O due JJ
O by IN
I Oct<period> NNP
I 31 CD
O or CC
I Nov<period> NNP
I 30 CD
O may MD
O be VB
O delayed VBN
O to TO
I Jan<period> NNP
I 16 CD
O <period> <period>
I Extensions NNS
O ca MD
O n<apost>t RB
O be VB
O granted VBN
O for IN
O filing VBG
I employment-tax JJ
I returns NNS
O due JJ
I Oct<period> NNP
I 31 CD
O or CC
O for IN
O depositing VBG
I withheld VBN
I taxes NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I late JJ
I penalties NNS
O will MD
O be VB
O abated VBN
O for IN
I deposits NNS
O made VBN
O by IN
I Nov<period> NNP
I 15 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I notice NN
O also RB
O grants VBZ
I relief NN
O for IN
I certain JJ
I estate-tax JJ
I returns NNS
O <period> <period>
I ONE-DAY JJ
I JAUNTS NNS
O in IN
I a DT
I chartered JJ
I boat NN
O were VBD
I perks NNS
O for IN
I permanent JJ
I staffers NNS
O of IN
I American NNP
I Business NNP
I Service NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Costa NNP
I Mesa NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Calif<period> NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I supplier NN
O of IN
I temporary JJ
I workers NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I IRS NNP
O denied VBD
I cost NN
I deductions NNS
O because IN
I few NN
O of IN
I the DT
I temps NNS
O got VBD
O to TO
O go VB
O aboard RB
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I the DT
I Tax NNP
I Court NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I limitations NNS
O were VBD
O reasonable JJ
O and CC
O realistic JJ
O and CC
O allowed VBD
I the DT
I deductions NNS
O <period> <period>
I USED-CAR NN
I BUYERS NNS
B who WP
O try VBP
O to TO
O avoid VB
I sales NNS
I tax VB
O by IN
O understating VBG
I prices NNS
O paid VBN
O in IN
I private JJ
I deals NNS
O are VBP
I the DT
I targets NNS
O of IN
I a DT
I New NNP
I York NNP
I drive NN
O <period> <period>
O Estimating VBG
O that IN
I the DT
I state NN
O may MD
O lose VB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 15 CD
I million CD
B a DT
I year NN
O <comma> <comma>
I officials NNS
O announced VBD
I the DT
I filing NN
O of IN
I 15 CD
I criminal JJ
I actions NNS
O and CC
O <quote> <quote>
I hundreds NNS
O <quote> <quote>
O of IN
I civil JJ
I penalties NNS
O <period> <period>
O WHEN WRB
I AN DT
I IRA NNP
I OWNER NNP
O dies VBZ
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I trustee NN
O of IN
I the DT
I individual JJ
I retirement NN
I account NN
O must MD
O file VB
I forms NNS
I 5498 CD
O reporting VBG
I market NN
I values NNS
O relating VBG
O to TO
I the DT
I decedent NN
O and CC
I each DT
I beneficiary NN
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I copies NNS
O to TO
I the DT
I executor NN
I and CC
I beneficiaries NNS
O <period> <period>
I IRS NNP
I Revenue NN
I Procedure NN
I 89-52 CD
O describes VBZ
I the DT
I reporting VBG
I requirements NNS
O <period> <period>
O BIGGER JJR
O THAN IN
I A DT
I BREADBOX NN
O was VBD
I this DT
I cash NN
I hoarder NN
B <apost>s POS
I reputation NN
O for IN
I honesty NN
O <period> <period>
I People NNS
O often RB
O cite VBP
I frugality NN
O and CC
I distrust NN
O of IN
I banks NNS
O to TO
O justify VB
I cash NN
I caches NNS
O to TO
I the DT
I IRS NNP
O <period> <period>
I Gregory NNP
I Damonne NNP
I Brown NNP
O of IN
I Fremont NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Calif<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I hardworking JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I reclusive JJ
I young JJ
I bachelor NN
O <comma> <comma>
O told VBD
I that DT
I story NN
O to TO
I the DT
I Tax NNP
I Court NNP
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I judges NNS
O usually RB
O find VBP
I the DT
I real JJ
I aim NN
O is VBZ
O to TO
O escape VB
I tax NN
O on IN
I hidden VBN
I income NN
O <colon> =colon=
O and CC
I the DT
I IRS NNP
O said VBD
I Brown NNP
O must MD
O have VB
O had VBN
I such JJ
I income NN
O -- =colon=
O although IN
I it PRP
O uncovered VBD
I no DT
I source NN
O -- =colon=
O because IN
I he PRP
O deposited VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 124<comma>732 CD
O in IN
I a DT
I bank NN
I account NN
O in IN
I 1982-84 CD
O while IN
O reporting VBG
I income NN
O of IN
I only RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 52<comma>012 CD
O <period> <period>
I Brown NNP
B <apost>s POS
I story NN
O =colon= =colon=
I The DT
I deposits NNS
O came VBD
O from IN
I savings NNS
O kept VBD
O in IN
I a DT
I Tupperware NNP
I breadbox NN
O <colon> =colon=
I he PRP
O saved VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 47<comma>000 CD
O in IN
I 1974-81 CD
O by IN
O living VBG
O with IN
I family NN
I members NNS
O and CC
O pinching VBG
I pennies NNS
O and CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 45<comma>000 CD
O of IN
I secret JJ
I gifts NNS
O from IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I remorseful JJ
I father NN
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O had VBD
O abandoned VBN
I the DT
I family NN
O in IN
I 1955 CD
O <period> <period>
I Brown NNP
O had VBD
I no DT
I proof NN
O <colon> =colon=
O but CC
I testimony NN
O of IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I mother NN
I and CC
I stepmother NN
O about IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I father NN
O and CC
O of IN
I an DT
I ex-employer NN
O about IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I honesty NN
I and CC
I habits NNS
O satisfied VBD
I a DT
I judge NN
O that IN
I Brown NNP
O was VBD
O truthful JJ
O and CC
I his PRP<dollar>
I tale NN
O of IN
I gifts NNS
O was VBD
O possible JJ
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I IRS NNP
O offered VBD
I no DT
I evidence NN
O of IN
I hidden VBN
I sources NNS
O of IN
I taxable JJ
I income NN
O <comma> <comma>
O so RB
I Judge NNP
I Shields NNP
O rejected VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I claims NNS
O <period> <period>
I BRIEFS NNS
I =colon= =colon=
O Asked VBN
O how WRB
I he PRP
O made VBD
I charitable JJ
I gifts NNS
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 26<comma>350 CD
O out IN
O of IN
I reported VBN
I two-year JJ
I income NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 46<comma>892 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I Thomas NNP
I H<period> NNP
I McFall NNP
O of IN
I Bryan NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Texas NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O told VBD
I the DT
I Tax NNP
I Court NNP
B he PRP
O had VBD
O understated VBN
I his PRP<dollar>
I income NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I court NN
O rejected VBD
I his PRP<dollar>
I incredible JJ
I claims NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O denied VBD
I his PRP<dollar>
I deductions NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O imposed VBD
I a DT
I negligence NN
I penalty NN
O <period><period><period> =colon=
O <period> <period>
I Rep<period> NNP
I Schaefer NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I R<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Colo<period> NNP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O entered VBD
I a DT
I bill NN
O to TO
O exempt VB
O from IN
I tax NN
B rewards NNS
O for IN
I tips NNS
O leading VBG
O to TO
I the DT
I arrest NN
O of IN
I violent JJ
I criminals NNS
O <period> <period>
I Kay NNP
I Peterson NNP
O mounts NNS
I her PRP<dollar>
I bicycle NN
O and CC
O grinds VBZ
O up IN
I yet RB
I another DT
I steep NN
I <comma> <comma>
I rocky JJ
I path NN
O seemingly RB
O suitable JJ
O only RB
O for IN
I mountain NN
I goats NNS
O <period> <period>
O After IN
I a DT
I tortuous JJ
I climb NN
O <comma> <comma>
I she PRP
O is VBZ
O rewarded VBN
O by IN
I a DT
I picture-postcard NN
I vista NN
O =colon= =colon=
I a DT
I glade NN
O of IN
I golden JJ
I aspens NNS
O under IN
I an DT
I azure JJ
I Indian-summer JJ
I sky NN
O <period> <period>
I This DT
I place NN
O is VBZ
I 12 CD
I miles NNS
O into IN
I the DT
I back JJ
I country NN
O -- =colon=
I a DT
I day-long JJ
I trudge NN
O for IN
I a DT
I hiker NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O reached VBD
O by IN
I Ms<period> NNP
I Peterson NNP
O and CC
I six CD
I others NNS
O in IN
I a DT
I mere JJ
I two CD
I hours NNS
O of IN
O pedaling VBG
I fat-tired JJ
I mountain NN
I bikes NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I This DT
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Ms<period> NNP
I Peterson NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O is VBZ
I what WP
B it PRP
O <apost>s VBZ
O all DT
O about IN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Twelve CD
I hundred CD
I miles NNS
O away RB
O <comma> <comma>
I rangers NNS
O at IN
I a DT
I Napa NNP
I County NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Calif<period> NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I state NN
I park NN
O are VBP
O among IN
I the DT
I many JJ
B who WP
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O quite RB
O share VBP
I the DT
I enthusiasm NN
O <period> <period>
I This DT
I summer NN
O <comma> <comma>
I speeding VBG
I bikers NNS
O were VBD
O blamed VBN
O for IN
I an DT
I accident NN
O in IN
I the DT
I Napa NNP
I County NNP
I park NN
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I which WDT
B a DT
I horse NN
O -- =colon=
O spooked VBN
O on IN
I a DT
I trail NN
B that WDT
O was VBD
O closed VBN
O to TO
I bikers NNS
O -- =colon=
O broke VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I leg NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I animal NN
O had VBD
O to TO
O be VB
O destroyed VBN
O <colon> =colon=
I the DT
I bikers NNS
O fled VBD
O and CC
O were VBD
O never RB
O found VBN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I numerous JJ
I parks NNS
O near IN
I San NNP
I Francisco NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I rangers NNS
O have VBP
O been VBN
O forced VBN
O to TO
O close VB
I trails NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O set VBN
O up IN
I speed NN
I traps NNS
O and CC
O use NN
I radar NN
I guns NNS
O to TO
O curb VB
I fast RB
I and CC
I reckless JJ
I riding NN
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O have VBP
O even RB
O sent VBN
I helicopters NNS
O in IN
I pursuit NN
O of IN
I bikers NNS
O after IN
I hikers NNS
I and CC
I equestrians NNS
O complained VBD
I they PRP
O were VBD
O being VBG
O driven VBN
O from IN
I trails NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O were VBD
O being VBG
O overrun VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Steve NNP
I Fiala NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I trails NNS
I coordinator NN
O of IN
I the DT
I East NNP
I Bay NNP
I Regional NNP
I Park NNP
I District NNP
O <period> <period>
I Two CD
I years NNS
O ago RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I district NN
O decided VBD
O to TO
O limit VB
I the DT
I bikes NNS
O to TO
I fire VB
I roads NNS
O in IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I 65<comma>000 CD
I hilly JJ
I acres NNS
O <period> <period>
O From IN
I about IN
I 200<comma>000 CD
B six CD
I years NNS
O ago RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I number NN
O of IN
I mountain NN
I bikes NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O is VBZ
O expected VBN
O to TO
O grow VB
O to TO
I 10 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I 1990 CD
O <period> <period>
I At IN
I least JJS
I half PDT
I that DT
I growth NN
O will MD
O have VB
O come VBN
O in IN
I the DT
I past JJ
I three CD
I years NNS
O alone RB
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I controversy NN
O kicked VBD
O up IN
O by IN
I the DT
I proliferation NN
O of IN
I these DT
I all-terrain JJ
I bicycles NNS
O is VBZ
I one CD
O of IN
I the DT
I most RBS
I divisive JJ
I storms NNS
O to TO
O blow VB
O through IN
I the DT
I national JJ
I conservation NN
I movement NN
O in IN
I recent JJ
I memory NN
O <period> <period>
I Bikers NNS
O -- =colon=
I many NN
O of IN
I them PRP
B ardent JJ
I environmentalists NNS
O -- =colon=
O proclaim VB
I their PRP<dollar>
I sport NN
B an DT
I efficient JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I safe JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I fitness-promoting JJ
I way NN
O to TO
O get VB
O back RB
O to TO
I nature NN
O <comma> <comma>
O while IN
O asserting VBG
I a DT
I right NN
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
I taxpayers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
O pedal VB
O on IN
I public JJ
I lands NNS
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I the DT
I bikes NNS
B <apost> POS
I burgeoning VBG
I numbers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I safety NN
I concerns NNS
O and CC
I fear NN
O that IN
I they PRP
O damage VBP
I fragile JJ
I landscapes NNS
O have VBP
O prompted VBN
I pleas NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O from IN
I the DT
I Sierras NNPS
O to TO
I the DT
I Eastern NNP
I Seaboard NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
O ban VB
I them PRP
O from IN
I the DT
I back JJ
I country NN
O <period> <period>
O Key NNP
O to TO
I the DT
I issue NN
O is VBZ
O that IN
I the DT
I bikes NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I skillful JJ
I hands NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O can MD
O go VB
O virtually RB
O anywhere RB
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O in IN
I reckless JJ
I hands NNS
O can MD
O become VB
I vehicles NNS
O of IN
I terror NN
O <period> <period>
I An DT
I adept JJ
I bicyclist NN
O can MD
O leap VB
O from IN
I a DT
I dead JJ
I stop NN
O to TO
I the DT
I top NN
O of IN
I a DT
I picnic NN
I table NN
O without IN
O losing VBG
I balance NN
O <period> <period>
I Such JJ
I skills NNS
O allow VBP
I riders NNS
O to TO
O fly VB
O down RB
I treacherous JJ
I mountain NN
I grades NNS
O at IN
I speeds NNS
O of IN
I up IN
I to TO
I 40 CD
I miles NNS
B an DT
I hour NN
O -- =colon=
I a DT
I thrill NN
O for IN
I the DT
I cyclist NN
O but CC
I a DT
I nightmare NN
O for IN
I unsuspecting JJ
I hikers NNS
I or CC
I equestrians NNS
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I harried VBN
I public-land JJ
I managers NNS
O across IN
I the DT
I nation NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I response NN
O is VBZ
O increasingly RB
O to TO
O shut VB
I the DT
I gates NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I state NN
O of IN
I California NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O following VBG
I the DT
I lead NN
O of IN
I some DT
I regional JJ
I parks NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O recently RB
O adopted VBN
I regulations NNS
B that WDT
O closed VBD
I nearly RB
I all DT
I hiking VBG
I paths NNS
O in IN
I state NN
I parks NNS
O to TO
I mountain NN
I bicycles NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I move NN
O largely RB
O consigns VBZ
I them PRP
O to TO
I roads NNS
O used VBN
O by IN
I motorized JJ
I vehicles NNS
O <period> <period>
I Most JJS
I other JJ
I states NNS
O have VBP
O enacted VBN
I similar JJ
I bans NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I bikes NNS
O are VBP
O unwelcome JJ
O on IN
I trails NNS
O in IN
I national JJ
I parks NNS
O <period> <period>
I Even RB
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I Forest NNP
I Service NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I whose WP<dollar>
I lenient JJ
I <quote> <quote>
I multiple-use JJ
I <quote> <quote>
I philosophy NN
O permits VBZ
I motorized VBN
I vehicles NNS
O on IN
I thousands NNS
O of IN
I miles NNS
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I trails NNS
O across IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O has VBZ
O begun VBN
O to TO
O close VB
I some DT
I lands NNS
O to TO
I the DT
I bikes NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O including VBG
I major JJ
I portions NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I popular JJ
I Pacific NNP
I Crest NNP
I Trail NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O stretches VBZ
O from IN
I California NNP
O to TO
I Canada NNP
O <period> <period>
O Often RB
I these DT
I closings NNS
O come VBP
O after IN
I vigorous JJ
I anti-bike JJ
I lobbying NN
O by IN
I conservation NN
I organizations NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I politically RB
I potent JJ
I Sierra NNP
I Club NNP
O among IN
I them PRP
O <period> <period>
I Sierra NNP
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O instrumental JJ
O in IN
O securing VBG
I a DT
I number NN
O of IN
I the DT
I California NNP
I bans NNS
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O waging VBG
I an DT
I all-out JJ
I campaign NN
O to TO
O beat VB
O back RB
I a DT
I proposal NN
O <comma> <comma>
O pushed VBN
O by IN
I Utah NNP
I bike NN
I groups NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
O allow VB
I the DT
I cycles NNS
O in IN
I federally RB
I designated VBN
I wilderness NN
I areas NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O where WRB
I they PRP
O are VBP
O now RB
O prohibited VBN
O <period> <period>
O Yet RB
I Sierra NNP
B <apost>s POS
I hard-line JJ
I stance NN
O has VBZ
O created VBN
I something NN
O of IN
I a DT
I rift NN
O in IN
I the DT
I organization NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O estimates VBZ
O that IN
I 17 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I 500<comma>000 CD
I members NNS
O own JJ
I mountain NN
I bikes NNS
O <period> <period>
I Pressure NN
O from IN
I these DT
I members NNS
O prompted VBD
I the DT
I club NN
O recently RB
O to TO
O soften VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I anti-bike JJ
I rhetoric NN
O <colon> =colon=
I it PRP
O no RB
O longer RB
O <comma> <comma>
O for IN
I example NN
O <comma> <comma>
O lumps VBZ
I the DT
I bikes NNS
O into IN
I the DT
I same JJ
I category NN
O as IN
I motorcycles NNS
O and CC
I other JJ
I terrain-marring JJ
I off-road JJ
I vehicles NNS
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I the DT
I club NN
O still RB
O insists VBZ
O that IN
I public JJ
I lands NNS
O ought MD
O to TO
O be VB
O closed VBN
O to TO
I the DT
I bikes NNS
O unless IN
I studies NNS
O indicate VBP
I the DT
I bikes NNS
O wo MD
O n<apost>t RB
O injure VB
I the DT
I environment NN
O or CC
I other JJ
I users NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O have VBP
I a DT
I mountain NN
I bike NN
O <comma> <comma>
O yet RB
O as IN
I a DT
I hiker NN
B I PRP
O <apost>ve VBP
O been VBN
O run VB
O off IN
I the DT
I road NN
O by IN
I kids NNS
O careening VBG
O down RP
I a DT
I fire NN
I trail NN
O on IN
I them PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Gene NNP
I Coan NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I official NN
O at IN
I Sierra NNP
B <apost>s POS
I headquarters NN
O in IN
I San NNP
I Francisco NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O echoing VBG
I the DT
I concerns NNS
O of IN
I many JJ
I members NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I People NNS
B who WP
O feel VBP
O that IN
I cyclists NNS
O should MD
O be VB
O banned VBN
O from IN
I an DT
I area NN
O are VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O looking VBG
O at IN
I the DT
I whole JJ
I picture NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O complains VBZ
I Mark NNP
I Langton NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I associate JJ
I editor NN
O of IN
I Mountain NNP
I and CC
I City NNP
I Biking NNP
I magazine NN
O in IN
I Canoga NNP
I Park NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Calif NNP
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Langton NNP
O is VBZ
O among IN
I the DT
I legions NNS
O of IN
I bikers NNS
B who WP
O got VBD
I their PRP<dollar>
I first JJ
I taste NN
O of IN
I wilderness NN
O as IN
I hikers NNS
I or CC
I backpackers NNS
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O says VBZ
I fellow NN
I bikers NNS
O show VBP
I the DT
I same JJ
I concern NN
O for IN
I the DT
I land NN
B that IN
B they PRP
O demonstrated VBD
O as IN
I hikers NNS
O <colon> =colon=
I many JJ
O are VBP
O appalled VBN
O that IN
I the DT
I conservation NN
I community NN
O would MD
O suddenly RB
O consider VB
I them PRP
B the DT
I enemy NN
O <period> <period>
O To TO
O fight VB
O back RB
O <comma> <comma>
I activists NNS
O such JJ
O as IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Langton NNP
O are VBP
O forming VBG
I groups NNS
O to TO
O lobby VB
I land NN
I managers NNS
O over IN
I access NN
I issues NNS
O and CC
O undertake VB
I education NN
I programs NNS
O to TO
O show VB
O that IN
I the DT
I bikes NNS
O can MD
O responsibly RB
O share VB
I trails NNS
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Langton NNP
B <apost>s POS
I group NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Concerned NNP
I Off-Road NNP
I Bicyclists NNPS
I Association NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O mounted VBN
I petition NN
I drives NNS
O to TO
O help VB
O keep VB
O open JJ
I certain JJ
I Santa NNP
I Monica NNP
I Mountain NNP
I trails NNS
O designated VBN
O for IN
I closing VBG
O <period> <period>
I Biking NNP
I groups NNS
O in IN
I Montana NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Idaho NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Michigan NNP
I and CC
I Massachusetts NNP
O have VBP
O won VBN
I similar JJ
I concessions NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O says VBZ
I Tim NNP
I Blumenthal NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I mountain NN
I bike NN
I editor NN
O of IN
I Bicycling NNP
I magazine NN
O <period> <period>
I These DT
I groups NNS
O have VBP
O been VBN
O trying VBG
O to TO
O improve VB
I the DT
I mountain NN
I biker NN
B <apost>s POS
I image NN
O <colon> =colon=
O in IN
I the DT
I San NNP
I Francisco-area JJ
I park NN
I district NN
O where WRB
I a DT
I ranger NN
O was VBD
O clobbered VBN
O by IN
I a DT
I cyclist NN
B this DT
I summer NN
B bikers NNS
O have VBP
O formed VBN
I a DT
I volunteer NN
I patrol NN
O to TO
O help VB
I rangers NNS
O enforce VB
I regulations NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O to TO
O school VB
I riders NNS
O in IN
I proper JJ
I trail NN
I etiquette NN
O <period> <period>
I Even RB
I staunch JJ
I anti-bike JJ
I Sierra NNP
I members NNS
O concede VBP
O that IN
I 10 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I all DT
I riders NNS
O cause VBP
I most RBS
O of IN
I the DT
I problems NNS
O <period> <period>
O While IN
I some DT
O are VBP
I renegade NN
I riders NNS
B who WP
O simply JJ
O scorn NN
I regulations NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I much JJ
I bad JJ
I riding NN
O simply RB
O reflects VBZ
I ignorance NN
B that WDT
O can MD
O be VB
O corrected VBN
O through IN
O <quote> <quote>
I education NN
O and CC
I peer NN
I pressure NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Jim NNP
I Hasenauer NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I director NN
O of IN
I the DT
I International NNP
I Mountain NNP
I Biking NNP
I Association NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O think VBP
I we PRP
O <apost>re VBP
O making VBG
I progress NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Few JJ
O would MD
O have VB
O foreseen VBN
I such JJ
I a DT
I furor NN
O when WRB
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I decade NN
O ago RB
O <comma> <comma>
I some DT
I Marin NNP
I County NNP
I bicycle NN
I enthusiasts NNS
O created VBD
I a DT
I hybrid JJ
I bike NN
O using VBG
I fat JJ
I tires NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I lightweight JJ
I metallurgy NN
O and CC
I multi-gear JJ
I technology NN
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O wanted VBD
I a DT
I machine NN
B that WDT
O would MD
O allow VB
I them PRP
O to TO
O pedal VB
O into IN
I rugged JJ
I terrain NN
O then RB
O inaccessible JJ
O to TO
I cycles NNS
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O got VBD
I a DT
I machine NN
O more RBR
O responsive JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O more RBR
O stable JJ
O and CC
O in IN
I many JJ
I ways NNS
O easier JJR
O to TO
O ride VB
O than IN
I the DT
I thin-tired JJ
I racing NN
I bikes NNS
B that IN
O then RB
O were VBD
I the DT
I rage NN
O <period> <period>
O When WRB
I the DT
I bikes NNS
O first JJ
O entered VBD
I mass NN
I production NN
O in IN
I 1981 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I they PRP
O were VBD
O dismissed VBN
O as IN
I a DT
I fad NN
O <period> <period>
I Last JJ
I year NN
O <comma> <comma>
I 25 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I the DT
I 10 CD
I million CD
I bicycles NNS
O sold VBN
O in IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O were VBD
I mountain NN
I bikes NNS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I California NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I bellwether NN
I market NN
O <comma> <comma>
I they PRP
O accounted VBD
O for IN
I more JJR
I than IN
I 80 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I all DT
I bike NN
I sales NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I majority NN
O of IN
I the DT
I bikes NNS
O never RB
O even RB
O make VB
I it PRP
O into IN
I the DT
I high JJ
I country NN
O <period> <period>
I City NN
I dwellers NNS
O love VBP
I them PRP
O because IN
I they PRP
O shift VBP
O smoothly RB
O in IN
I traffic NN
O <comma> <comma>
O bounce VB
O easily RB
O over IN
I curbs NNS
O and CC
O roll NN
O through IN
I road NN
I glass NN
O with IN
I far RB
I fewer RBR
I flat JJ
I tires NNS
O than IN
I racing VBG
I bikes NNS
O <period> <period>
I Crested NNP
I Butte NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I population NN
I 1<comma>200 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
I a DT
I bastion NN
O of IN
I the DT
I sport NN
O <period> <period>
O By IN
I one CD
I estimate NN
O <comma> <comma>
I everyone NN
I here RB
O under IN
I 50 CD
O owns VBZ
I at IN
I least JJS
I one CD
I bike NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I town NN
O is VBZ
I home NN
O to TO
I the DT
I Mountain NNP
I Bike NNP
I Hall NNP
O of IN
I Fame NNP
O and CC
I it PRP
O hosts VBZ
I the DT
I annual JJ
I Fat NNP
I Tire NNP
I Bike NNP
I Week NNP
O <period> <period>
I This DT
I summer NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I jamboree NN
O attracted VBN
I more JJR
I visitors NNS
O than IN
I the DT
I busiest JJS
I week NN
O of IN
I the DT
I town NN
B <apost>s POS
I winter NN
I ski NN
I season NN
O <period> <period>
I David NNP
I Lindsey NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I chairman NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Fat NNP
I Tire NNP
I Bike NNP
I celebration NN
O <comma> <comma>
O muses VBZ
O that IN
I the DT
I bike NN
B <apost>s POS
I popularity NN
O may MD
O be VB
I a DT
I combination NN
O of IN
I technology NN
I and CC
I nostalgia NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I mountain NN
I bike NN
O feels VBZ
O as RB
O comfortable JJ
O as IN
I the DT
I <quote> <quote>
I paperboy NN
I <apost> <quote>
I bike NN
B you PRP
O had VBD
O as IN
I a DT
I kid NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I it PRP
O can MD
O do VB
I so RB
I much RB
I more JJR
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O says VBZ
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I following VBG
I issues NNS
O were VBD
O recently RB
O filed VBN
O with IN
I the DT
I Securities NNP
I and CC
I Exchange NNP
I Commission NNP
O =colon= =colon=
I Canada NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Province NNP
O of IN
I Nova NNP
I Scotia NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I shelf NN
I offering NN
O of IN
I up IN
I to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 550 CD
I million CD
O of IN
I debentures NNS
O <period> <period>
I Golar NNP
I Gas NNP
I Holding NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I subsidiary NN
O of IN
I Gotaas-Larsen NNP
I Shipping NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I offering NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 280 CD
I million CD
I first JJ
I preferred JJ
I ship NN
I mortgage NN
I notes NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O via IN
I Merrill NNP
I Lynch NNP
I Capital NNP
I Markets NNPS
O <period> <period>
I H<period>F<period> NNP
I Ahmanson NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I offering NN
O of IN
I four CD
I million CD
I shares NNS
O of IN
I noncumulative JJ
I convertible JJ
I preferred JJ
I stock NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Series NNP
I B<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O via IN
I Goldman NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Sachs NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I First NNP
I Boston NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Merrill NNP
I Lynch NNP
O <period> <period>
I Shared NNP
I Technologies NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I offering NN
O of IN
I 2<period>5 CD
I million CD
I common JJ
I shares NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O via IN
I Smetek NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Van NNP
I Horn NNP
I <amp> CC
I Cormack NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O and CC
I Oakes NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Fitzwilliams NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co NNP
O <period> <period>
I Stock-market NN
I tremors NNS
O again RB
O shook VBD
I bond NN
I prices NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O while IN
I the DT
I dollar NN
O turned VBD
O in IN
I a DT
I mixed VBN
I performance NN
O <period> <period>
I Early JJ
I yesterday NN
O <comma> <comma>
I investors NNS
O scrambled VBD
O to TO
O buy VB
I Treasury NNP
I bonds NNS
O for IN
I safety NN
O as IN
I stock NN
I prices NNS
O plummeted VBD
O and CC
I fears NNS
O mounted VBN
O of IN
I a DT
I replay NN
O of IN
I Friday NNP
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I stocks NNS
O later RB
O recovered VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O erasing VBG
I most RBS
O of IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I early JJ
I declines NNS
O <period> <period>
I That DT
O cut NN
O short VB
I the DT
I rally NN
O in IN
I Treasury NNP
I bonds NNS
O and CC
O depressed JJ
I prices NNS
O moderately RB
O below IN
I late JJ
I Monday NNP
B <apost>s POS
I levels NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Dow NNP
I Jones NNP
I Industrial NNP
I Average NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O down RB
I more JJR
I than IN
I 60<period>25 CD
I points NNS
O early RB
O in IN
I the DT
I day NN
O <comma> <comma>
O finished VBD
I 18<period>65 CD
I points NNS
O lower JJR
O at IN
I 2638<period>73 CD
O <period> <period>
I Long-term NNP
I Treasury NNP
I issues NNS
O declined VBD
I about IN
I half PDT
I a DT
I point NN
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 5 NN
O for IN
I each DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<comma>000 CD
I face NN
I amount NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O clearly RB
O is VBZ
O leading VBG
I the DT
I bond NN
I markets NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Jack NNP
I Conlon NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I executive JJ
I vice NN
I president NN
O at IN
I Nikko NNP
I Securities NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I People NNS
O are VBP
O breathing VBG
I a DT
I major JJ
I sigh NN
O of IN
I relief NN
O that IN
I the DT
I world NN
O did VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O end VB
I Monday NNP
I morning NN
O <quote> <quote>
O or CC
I yesterday NN
O <period> <period>
I Gold NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I closely RB
I watched VBN
I barometer NN
O of IN
I investor NN
I anxiety NN
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
O little RB
O changed VBN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I dollar NN
O initially RB
O fell VBD
O against IN
I other JJ
I major JJ
I currencies NNS
O on IN
I news NN
O that IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I trade NN
I deficit NN
O surged VBD
O in IN
I August NNP
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 10<period>77 CD
I billion CD
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I the DT
I dollar NN
O later RB
O rebounded VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O finishing VBG
O slightly RB
O higher JJR
O against IN
I the DT
I yen NN
O although IN
O slightly RB
O lower JJR
O against IN
I the DT
I mark NN
O <period> <period>
I Federal NNP
I Reserve NNP
I officials NNS
O sent VBD
I another DT
I signal NN
O of IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I determination NN
O to TO
O shore VB
O up IN
I investor NN
I confidence NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I an DT
I apparent JJ
I attempt NN
O to TO
O keep VB
I a DT
I lid NN
O on IN
I short-term JJ
I interest NN
I rates NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Fed NNP
O once RB
O again RB
O pumped VBN
I money NN
O into IN
I the DT
I banking NN
I system NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I the DT
I Fed NNP
I move NN
O was VBD
I a DT
I small JJ
I gesture NN
O <comma> <comma>
I traders NNS
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Fed JJ
I officials NNS
O appear VBP
O reluctant JJ
O to TO
O ease VB
I their PRP<dollar>
I credit NN
I grip NN
O any DT
O further JJ
O because IN
I a DT
I bold JJ
I move NN
O does VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O appear VB
O necessary JJ
O <comma> <comma>
I several JJ
I investment NN
I managers NNS
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Fed NNP
O has VBZ
O allowed VBN
I a DT
I key JJ
I short-term JJ
I interest NN
I rate NN
O to TO
O decline VB
I about IN
I one-quarter NN
I percentage NN
I point NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I federal JJ
I funds NNS
I rate NN
O on IN
I overnight JJ
I loans NNS
O between IN
I banks NNS
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O hovering VBG
O around IN
I 8 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>4 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O down RB
O from IN
I 9 CD
I <percent> NN
O previously RB
O <period> <period>
O Although IN
I stocks NNS
O have VBP
O led VBN
I bonds NNS
B this DT
I week NN
O <comma> <comma>
I some DT
I traders NNS
O predict VBP
I that DT
I relationship NN
O will MD
O reverse VB
O during IN
I the DT
I next JJ
I few JJ
I weeks NNS
O <period> <period>
I Nikko NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Mr<period> NNP
I Conlon NNP
O fears VBZ
I a DT
I huge JJ
I wave NN
O of IN
I Treasury NNP
I borrowing NN
B early JJ
I next JJ
I month NN
O will MD
O drive VB
O down RB
I Treasury NNP
I bond NN
I prices NNS
O <period> <period>
I That DT
O <comma> <comma>
O coupled VBN
O with IN
I poor JJ
I third-quarter JJ
I corporate-earnings NNS
I comparisons NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O will MD
O make VB
I trouble NN
O for IN
I the DT
I equity NN
I market NN
O for IN
I the DT
I next JJ
I two CD
I to TO
I three CD
I months NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O says VBZ
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I several JJ
I other JJ
I traders NNS
O contend VBP
I investors NNS
O have VBP
O overreacted VBN
O to TO
I junk-bond NN
I jitters NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O that IN
I stock NN
I prices NNS
O will MD
O continue VB
O to TO
O recover VB
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I They PRP
O shot NN
I the DT
I whole JJ
I orchestra NN
O just RB
O because IN
I the DT
I piano NN
I player NN
O hit VBD
I a DT
I bad JJ
I note NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Laszlo NNP
I Birinyi NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I president NN
O of IN
I Birinyi NNP
I Associates NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O referring VBG
O to TO
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
B <apost>s POS
I plunge NN
B Friday NNP
O on IN
I news NN
O of IN
I trouble NN
O in IN
O financing VBG
I the DT
I UAL NNP
I Corp NNP
I <period> <period>
I buy-out NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I major JJ
I market NN
I activity NN
O =colon= =colon=
I Treasury NNP
I bond NN
I prices NNS
O fell VBD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I yield NN
O on IN
I 30-year NNP
I Treasury NNP
I bonds NNS
O climbed VBD
O back RB
O above IN
I 8 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O ending VBG
I the DT
I day NN
O at IN
I 8<period>03 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I dollar NN
O was VBD
O mixed VBN
O <period> <period>
I Late JJ
I yesterday NN
O in IN
I New NNP
I York NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I dollar NN
O rose VBD
O to TO
I 142<period>75 CD
I yen NN
O from IN
I 141<period>80 CD
I yen NN
B Monday NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O fell VBD
O to TO
I 1<period>8667 CD
I marks NNS
O from IN
I 1<period>8685 CD
I marks NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Consumer NNP
I News NNP
I and CC
I Business NNP
I Channel NNP
I cable NN
I network NN
O and CC
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I News NNP
I <amp> CC
I World NNP
I Report NNP
O have VBP
O formed VBN
I a DT
I joint JJ
I venture NN
O to TO
O produce VB
I cable NN
I program NN
I versions NNS
O of IN
I special JJ
I issues NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I magazine NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I programs NNS
O will MD
O run VB
O on IN
I the DT
I cable NN
I network NN
B the DT
I Sunday NNP
I evening NN
O immediately RB
O prior RB
O to TO
I the DT
I release NN
O of IN
I the DT
I special JJ
I issue NN
O of IN
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I News NNP
I <amp> CC
I World NNP
I Report NNP
O <period> <period>
I CNBC NNP
O is VBZ
I a DT
I joint JJ
I venture NN
O of IN
I the DT
I National NNP
I Broadcasting NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I unit NN
O of IN
I General NNP
I Electric NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Cablevision NNP
I System NNP
I Corp NNP
O <period> <period>
I Advertisers NNS
O will MD
O be VB
O offered VBN
I an DT
I advertising NN
I package NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O for IN
I a DT
I single JJ
I price NN
O <comma> <comma>
O will MD
O include VB
I time NN
O on IN
I the DT
I CNBC NNP
I program NN
O and CC
I ad NN
I pages NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I special JJ
I guides NNS
O <period> <period>
I CNBC NNP
O will MD
O produce VB
I six CD
I <comma> <comma>
I one-hour JJ
I programs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O beginning VBG
O in IN
I April NNP
I 1990 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I first JJ
I program NN
O scheduled VBN
O in IN
I the DT
I joint JJ
I venture NN
O is VBZ
O <quote> <quote>
O The DT
O 1990 CD
I Homeowner NNP
I <apost>s POS
O Guide NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Other JJ
I programs NNS
I and CC
I special JJ
I issues NNS
O will MD
O be VB
O based VBN
O on IN
I themes NNS
O of IN
I health NN
O <comma> <comma>
I jobs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I personal JJ
I finance NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I best JJS
I colleges NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I investments NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I programs NNS
O will MD
O be VB
O written VBN
O and CC
O produced VBN
O by IN
I CNBC NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I background NN
I and CC
I research NN
O provided VBN
O by IN
I staff NN
O from IN
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I News NNP
I <amp> CC
I World NNP
I Report NNP
O <period> <period>
I Skoal NNP
I Daze NNP
I I PRP
O <apost>ve VBP
O learned VBD
I the DT
I hard JJ
I way NN
O that IN
I too RB
I much JJ
I booze NN
O Takes VBZ
I revenge NN
B the DT
I next JJ
I day NN
O about IN
I nine CD
O <colon> =colon=
I No DT
I wonder NN
I I PRP
O say VBP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O drink VBP
O to TO
I your PRP<dollar>
I health NN
O <quote> <quote>
O -- =colon=
I It PRP
O certainly RB
O is VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O to TO
I mine VB
O ! <period>
I -- =colon=
I George NNP
I O<period> NNP
I Ludcke NNP
I <period> <period>
O Spaced NNP
O Out IN
I Those DT
I supermarket NN
I tabloids NNS
O Make VBP
I me PRP
O feel VBP
O slow JJ
O Because IN
I I PRP
O still RB
O have VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O seen VBN
I -- =colon=
I Bruce NNP
I Kafaroff NNP
I <period> <period>
I Daffynition NN
I Repression NN
O =colon= =colon=
I emote VB
I control NN
O <period> <period>
I -- =colon=
I Daisy NNP
I Brown NNP
I <period> <period>
I Weyerhaeuser NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O reported VBD
I a DT
I one-time JJ
I gain NN
O and CC
I strong JJ
I wood-product NN
I sales NNS
B that WDT
O offset VBP
I weakness NN
O in IN
I pulp NN
I and CC
I paper NN
O to TO
O fuel VB
I a DT
I 15 CD
I <percent> NN
I jump NN
O in IN
I third-quarter JJ
I net JJ
I income NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 166<period>8 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 78 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I the DT
I 1988 CD
I third JJ
I quarter NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I forest-products NNS
I company NN
O reported VBD
I profit NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 144<period>9 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 69 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <period> <period>
I Sales NNS
O rose VBD
I 9 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>57 CD
I billion CD
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>36 CD
I billion CD
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I the DT
I nine CD
I months NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I company NN
O posted VBD
I a DT
I 14 CD
I <percent> NN
I rise NN
O in IN
I profit NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 469<period>8 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>21 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 410<period>3 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>95 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <period> <period>
I Sales NNS
O rose VBD
I 9 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 7<period>54 CD
I billion CD
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 6<period>95 CD
I billion CD
O <period> <period>
I Results NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I 1989 CD
I third JJ
I quarter NN
I and CC
I nine CD
I months NNS
O include VBP
I a DT
I pretax JJ
I loss NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 33 CD
I million CD
O from IN
I the DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I business NN
I improvement NN
I and CC
I refocusing NN
I program NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I a DT
I gain NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 49 CD
I million CD
O on IN
I the DT
I sale NN
O of IN
I a DT
I subsidiary NN
B <apost>s POS
I common JJ
I stock NN
O <period> <period>
I Forest-products NNS
I operations NNS
O strengthened VBN
O in IN
I the DT
I third JJ
I quarter NN
O <comma> <comma>
O while IN
I paper NN
I operations NNS
O were VBD
O dogged VBN
O by IN
I higher JJR
I costs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I soft JJ
I newsprint NN
I exports NNS
O and CC
I a DT
I strong JJ
I Japanese JJ
I yen NN
O <period> <period>
I Some DT
I competing VBG
I forest-products NNS
I firms NNS
O have VBP
O recently RB
O reported VBN
I improved VBN
I results NNS
O due JJ
O to TO
I strong JJ
I pulp NN
I and CC
I paper NN
I business NN
O <period> <period>
I Weyerhaeuser NNP
B <apost>s POS
I pulp NN
I and CC
I paper NN
I operations NNS
O were VBD
O up IN
O for IN
I the DT
I nine CD
I months NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I full-year JJ
I performance NN
O depends VBZ
O on IN
I the DT
I balance NN
O of IN
I operating VBG
I and CC
I maintenance NN
I costs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O plus CC
I pricing NN
O of IN
I certain JJ
I products NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I company NN
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O Looking VBG
O ahead RB
O to TO
I the DT
I fourth JJ
I quarter NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I company NN
O said VBD
I export NN
I log NN
I and CC
I lumber NN
I markets NNS
O will MD
O be VB
O weak JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O while IN
I panel NN
I and CC
I plywood NN
I markets NNS
O will MD
O be VB
O stronger JJR
O <period> <period>
I Pulp NNP
I and CC
I paper NN
I performance NN
O depends VBZ
O on IN
I cost NN
I and CC
I price NN
I variables NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I company NN
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Bankers NNP
I Trust NNP
I New NNP
I York NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O became VBD
I the DT
I latest JJS
I major JJ
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I bank NN
O to TO
O increase VB
I reserves NNS
O for IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I loans NNS
O to TO
I less-developed JJ
I countries NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O making VBG
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>6 CD
I billion CD
I third-quarter JJ
I addition NN
O to TO
I its PRP<dollar>
I provision NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I bank NN
O also RB
O said VBD
I it PRP
O expects VBZ
O to TO
O report VB
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>42 CD
I billion CD
I loss NN
O for IN
I the DT
I third JJ
I quarter NN
O and CC
I a DT
I loss NN
O for IN
I the DT
I full JJ
I year NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I new JJ
I reserves NNS
O bring VBP
I the DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I provision NN
O for IN
I loans NNS
O to TO
I Third NNP
I World NNP
I countries NNS
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>6 CD
I billion CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 85 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I Bankers NNP
I Trust NNP
B <apost>s POS
I medium NN
I and CC
I long-term JJ
I loans NNS
O to TO
I these DT
I countries NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Step NN
O up IN
O to TO
I the DT
I plate NN
O and CC
O take VB
I the DT
I big JJ
I swing NN
O <period> <period>
O Get VB
I the DT
I problem NN
O behind IN
I you PRP
O and CC
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O look VB
O back RB
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I James NNP
I J<period> NNP
I McDermott NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I analyst NN
O at IN
I Keefe NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Bruyette NNP
I <amp> CC
I Woods NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
O approving VBG
O of IN
I the DT
I move NN
O <period> <period>
I Bankers NNP
I Trust NNP
O <quote> <quote>
O has VBZ
O had VBN
I the DT
I capacity NN
O to TO
O do VB
I this DT
O for IN
I some DT
I time NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I the DT
I analyst NN
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O expects VBZ
I Citicorp NNP
O to TO
O take VB
I a DT
I similar JJ
I step NN
B this DT
I year NN
O <period> <period>
I Citicorp NN
B yesterday NN
O reported VBD
I a DT
I 9 CD
I <percent> NN
I third-quarter JJ
I earnings NNS
I drop NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
B analysts NNS
O called VBD
O a DT
O bit NN
O disappointing JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O while IN
I Manufacturers NNP
I Hanover NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O posted VBD
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 789 CD
I million CD
I loss NN
O for IN
I the DT
I quarter NN
O after IN
O adding VBG
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 950 CD
I million CD
O to TO
I its PRP<dollar>
I reserve NN
O for IN
I loans NNS
O to TO
I less-developed JJ
I countries NNS
O <period> <period>
I Three CD
I other JJ
I major JJ
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I banks NNS
O posted VBD
I earnings NNS
I increases NNS
O <period> <period>
I Wells NNP
I Fargo NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co<period> NNP
O of IN
I San NNP
I Francisco NNP
O posted VBD
I a DT
I 17 CD
I <percent> NN
I jump NN
O <period> <period>
I PNC NNP
I Financial NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I parent NN
O of IN
I Pittsburgh NNP
I National NNP
I Bank NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O reported VBD
I net JJ
I income NN
O climbed VBD
I 9<period>8 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O while IN
I net JJ
O for IN
I Banc NNP
I One CD
I Corp<period> NNP
O of IN
I Columbus NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Ohio NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O grew VBD
I 3<period>8 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I Citicorp NNP
I Analysts NNS
O were VBD
O only RB
O slightly RB
O disappointed VBN
O by IN
I Citicorp NNP
B <apost>s POS
I numbers NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I There EX
O <apost>s VBZ
I nothing NN
O in IN
I here RB
B that DT
O <apost>s VBZ
O horrible NN
O and CC
I nothing NN
O to TO
O make VB
I you PRP
O think VB
I they PRP
O <apost>re VBP
O setting VBG
I the DT
I world NN
O on IN
I fire NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Carole NNP
I Berger NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I analyst NN
O for IN
I C<period>J<period> NNP
I Lawrence NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Morgan NNP
I Grenfell NNP
I Inc NNP
O <period> <period>
I Earnings NNS
O from IN
I the DT
I bank NN
B <apost>s POS
I global JJ
I consumer NN
I business NN
O grew VBD
I 27 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I consumer NN
I business NN
O continues VBZ
O to TO
O drive VB
I the DT
I earnings NNS
I stream NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I McDermott NNP
O of IN
I Keefe NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Bruyette NNP
I <amp> CC
I Woods NNP
O <period> <period>
I Corporate JJ
I finance NN
I and CC
I trading NN
I results NNS
O in IN
I member NN
I countries NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I Organization NNP
O for IN
I Economic NNP
I Cooperation NNP
I and CC
I Development NNP
O were VBD
O <quote> <quote>
O relatively RB
O flat JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O sometimes RB
O choppy JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I the DT
I bank NN
O said VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I profit NN
O for IN
I the DT
I area NN
O sank VBD
I 27 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I cross-border JJ
I loan NN
I portfolio NN
O reflected VBD
O <quote> <quote>
I adjustment NN
I problems NNS
O and CC
I episodic JJ
I payment NN
I patterns NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I the DT
I bank NN
O said VBD
I no DT
I interest NN
I payments NNS
O from IN
I Argentina NNP
O in IN
I the DT
I nine CD
I months NNS
O and CC
I none NN
O from IN
I Brazil NNP
O in IN
I the DT
I third JJ
I quarter NN
O <comma> <comma>
O while IN
I Venezuela NNP
O brought VBD
I itself PRP
O <quote> <quote>
O substantially RB
O current JJ
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Overall RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I portfolio NN
O narrowed VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I quarterly JJ
I loss NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 70 CD
I million CD
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 80 CD
I million CD
B a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I People NNS
O were VBD
O waiting VBG
O to TO
O see VB
O if IN
I we PRP
O would MD
O take VB
I an DT
I additional JJ
I provision NN
O <quote> <quote>
O for IN
I medium-term JJ
I and CC
I long-term JJ
I loans NNS
O to TO
I less-developed JJ
I countries NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Citicorp NNP
I spokesman NN
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I he PRP
O reiterated VBD
I the DT
I bank NN
B <apost>s POS
I position NN
O that IN
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O comfortable JJ
O with IN
I the DT
I current JJ
I level NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>6 CD
I billion CD
O <comma> <comma>
O covering VBG
I about IN
I 30 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I the DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 8<period>9 CD
I billion CD
O of IN
I such JJ
I loans NNS
O outstanding JJ
O <period> <period>
I Ronald NNP
I I<period> NNP
I Mandle NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I analyst NN
O at IN
I Sanford NNP
I C<period> NNP
I Bernstein NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O called VBN
I Citicorp NNP
B <apost>s POS
I venture-capital JJ
I gains NNS
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 93 CD
I million CD
O before IN
I taxes NNS
O <quote> <quote>
O strong JJ
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I A DT
I <quote> <quote>
I concerning VBG
I <quote> <quote>
I item NN
B the DT
I analyst NN
O cited VBD
O was VBD
I the DT
I 10 CD
I <percent> NN
I jump NN
O in IN
I expenses NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
B the DT
I bank NN
O attributes NNS
O to TO
I costs NNS
O of IN
O expanding VBG
O both DT
I its PRP<dollar>
I consumer NN
I credit-card NN
I operations NNS
O and CC
I its PRP<dollar>
I overseas JJ
I branch NN
I business NN
O <period> <period>
I Citicorp NNP
B <apost>s POS
I spokesman NN
O said VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O however RB
O <comma> <comma>
O that IN
I the DT
I bank NN
O is VBZ
O maintaining VBG
I those DT
I expenses NNS
O in IN
I proportion NN
O to TO
I revenue NN
I growth NN
O <period> <period>
I Wells NNP
I Fargo NNP
I Wells NNP
I Fargo NNP
O continued VBD
O to TO
O generate VB
I one CD
O of IN
I the DT
I highest JJS
I profit NN
I margins NNS
O among IN
I major JJ
I banks NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O minimizing VBG
I a DT
I drop NN
O in IN
I net JJ
I interest NN
I margin NN
O with IN
I 13 CD
I <percent> NN
I third-quarter JJ
I growth NN
O in IN
I high-yielding JJ
I business NN
I loans NNS
O and CC
I similar JJ
I growth NN
O in IN
I mortgages NNS
O <period> <period>
I Its PRP<dollar>
I margin NN
O fell VBD
I only RB
I seven CD
I basis NN
I points NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 7<bslash><fslash>100ths CD
O of IN
I a DT
I percentage NN
I point NN
O <comma> <comma>
O from IN
I a DT
I year NN
O ago RB
O <comma> <comma>
O compared VBN
O with IN
I a DT
I 13-point JJ
I drop NN
O at IN
I Security NNP
I Pacific NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O and CC
I much RB
I larger JJR
I declines NNS
O among IN
I banks NNS
O in IN
I other JJ
I parts NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I country NN
O <period> <period>
O As IN
I a DT
I result NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Wells NNP
I Fargo NNP
B <apost>s POS
I net JJ
I interest NN
I income NN
O rose VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 36<period>3 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 7 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 537 CD
I million CD
O for IN
I the DT
I quarter NN
O <period> <period>
I Non-interest JJ
I income NN
O fell VBD
O slightly RB
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 191<period>9 CD
I million CD
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 193<period>3 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O while IN
I Wells NNP
I Fargo NNP
O continued VBD
O to TO
O rigorously RB
O control VBP
I non-interest JJ
I expense NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O was VBD
O almost RB
O flat JJ
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 393<period>4 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I combination NN
O of IN
I solid JJ
I loan NN
I growth NN
O with IN
I tight JJ
I expense NN
I control NN
O gave VBD
I Wells NNP
I Fargo NNP
B a DT
I 1<period>25 CD
I <percent> NN
I return NN
O on IN
I average JJ
I assets NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I quarter NN
O <comma> <comma>
I about IN
I 40 CD
I <percent> NN
O higher JJR
O than IN
I Security NNP
I Pacific NNP
B <apost>s POS
O and CC
I a DT
I profit NN
I ratio NN
O matched VBN
O by IN
I only RB
I two CD
I or CC
I three CD
O other JJ
O major JJ
O banks NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O <period> <period>
I Wells NNP
I Fargo NNP
B <apost>s POS
I return NN
O on IN
I equity NN
O increased VBN
O to TO
I 24<period>4 CD
I <percent> NN
O from IN
I 23<period>8 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I Wells NNP
I Fargo NNP
O has VBZ
O sold VBN
I all DT
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I non-trade JJ
I loans NNS
O made VBN
O to TO
I less-developed JJ
I countries NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O managed VBD
O to TO
O partly RB
O reverse VB
I the DT
I sharp JJ
I rise NN
O in IN
I domestic JJ
I non-accrual JJ
I loans NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O fell VBD
I 8 CD
I <percent> NN
O from IN
I the DT
I previous JJ
I quarter NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 806<period>8 CD
I million CD
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 880<period>9 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I the DT
I amount NN
O was VBD
O still RB
I 39 CD
I <percent> NN
O higher JJR
O than IN
I the DT
I year-ago JJ
I level NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I 25 CD
I <percent> NN
O higher JJR
O as IN
I a DT
I percentage NN
O of IN
I total JJ
I loans NNS
O <period> <period>
I That DT
I trend NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Wells NNP
I Fargo NNP
B <apost>s POS
I heavy JJ
I exposure NN
O to TO
I leveraged JJ
I buy-outs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O are VBP
I about IN
I the DT
I only RB
I worries VBZ
B analysts NNS
O have VBP
O about IN
I Wells NNP
I Fargo NNP
B <apost>s POS
I financial JJ
I picture NN
O <period> <period>
I Wells NNP
I Fargo NNP
O is VBZ
O rebuilding VBG
I its PRP<dollar>
I loan-loss NN
I reserve NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O increased VBD
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 711 CD
I million CD
O at IN
I Sept<period> NNP
I 30 CD
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 664 CD
I million CD
B the DT
I previous JJ
I quarter NN
O but CC
O was VBD
O down RB
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 852 CD
I million CD
B a DT
I year NN
O ago RB
O <comma> <comma>
O when WRB
I the DT
I bank NN
O still RB
O had VBD
I some DT
I shaky JJ
I foreign JJ
I loans NNS
O <period> <period>
I Manufacturers NNP
I Hanover NNP
I Manufacturers NNP
I Hanover NNP
O said VBD
O that IN
O excluding VBG
I the DT
I addition NN
O to TO
I its PRP<dollar>
I reserves NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I certain JJ
I tax NN
I benefits NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I a DT
I one-time JJ
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 16 CD
I million CD
I gain NN
O on IN
I the DT
I sale NN
O of IN
I an DT
I interest NN
O in IN
I a DT
I foreign JJ
I leasing NN
I company NN
O <comma> <comma>
I third-quarter JJ
I earnings NNS
O were VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 75 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I comparable JJ
I year-earlier JJ
I number NN
O was VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 56 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I spokesman NN
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I bank NN
B <apost>s POS
I additional JJ
I provisions NNS
O brought VBD
I reserves NNS
O for IN
I loans NNS
O to TO
I less-developed JJ
I countries NNS
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>4 CD
I billion CD
O <comma> <comma>
O covering VBG
I 36 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I medium NN
I and CC
I long-term JJ
I loans NNS
O outstanding JJ
O to TO
I these DT
I nations NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I net JJ
I interest NN
I margin NN
O - =colon=
I the DT
I difference NN
O between IN
I the DT
I bank NN
B <apost>s POS
I cost NN
O of IN
I funds NNS
O and CC
I what WP
B it PRP
O receives VBZ
O as IN
I interest NN
I payments NNS
O -- =colon=
O improved VBN
O in IN
I the DT
I quarter NN
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
O did VBD
I certain JJ
I areas NNS
O of IN
I wholesale JJ
I banking NN
O <period> <period>
I Fees NNS
O from IN
I syndicating VBG
I loans NNS
O dropped VBD
I 48 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 21 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O did VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O take VB
I part NN
O in IN
I a DT
I lot NN
O of IN
I deals NNS
O <quote> <quote>
O in IN
I the DT
I quarter NN
O <quote> <quote>
O because IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I credit NN
I quality NN
O was VBD
O poor JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I the DT
I spokesman NN
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Expenses NNS
O unrelated JJ
O to TO
I interest VB
O rose VBD
I 5<period>4 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 541 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I PNC NNP
I Financial NNP
I PNC NNP
I Financial NNP
O cited VBD
I higher JJR
I income NN
O from IN
I sources NNS
O unrelated JJ
O to TO
I interest VB
O and CC
O said VBD
I it PRP
O continues VBZ
O to TO
O cut VB
I costs NNS
O <period> <period>
I Net JJ
I interest NN
I income NN
O in IN
I the DT
I third JJ
I quarter NN
O edged VBD
O up IN
I 1<period>4 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 317<period>7 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I Trust NN
I income NN
O grew VBD
I 15 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 49<period>9 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O while IN
I service NN
I charges NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I fees NNS
O and CC
I commissions NNS
O increased VBN
I 22 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 79<period>4 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I bank NN
B <apost>s POS
I total JJ
I allowance NN
O for IN
I credit NN
I losses NNS
O was VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 502<period>1 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 1<period>82 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I total JJ
I loans NNS
O <period> <period>
I Prime NNP
I Minister NNP
I Rajiv NNP
I Gandhi NNP
O set VBD
I a DT
I date NN
B next JJ
I month NN
O for IN
I general JJ
I elections NNS
B that IN
B some DT
I analysts NNS
O say VBP
O could MD
O cost VB
I him PRP
O and CC
O his PRP<dollar>
O ruling NN
O Congress NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I I PRP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O Party NNP
I control NN
O of IN
I the DT
I government NN
O <period> <period>
I Other JJ
I analysts NNS
O say VBP
I the DT
I Indian NNP
I leader NN
O could MD
O retain VB
I control NN
O with IN
I a DT
I slim JJ
I majority NN
O or CC
O be VB
O forced VBN
O to TO
O rule VB
O as IN
I the DT
I dominant JJ
I partner NN
O in IN
I a DT
I coalition NN
O with IN
I other JJ
I parties NNS
O <period> <period>
I Elections NNS
O in IN
I this DT
I large JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I diverse JJ
I and CC
I passionate JJ
I nation NN
O are VBP
O always RB
O hard JJ
O to TO
O predict VB
O <period> <period>
I Much RB
O depends VBZ
O on IN
I the DT
I opposition NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I loose JJ
I group NN
O of IN
I regional JJ
I and CC
I ideological JJ
I parties NNS
O led VBN
O by IN
O former JJ
O Gandhi NNP
O cabinet NN
O minister NNP
I Vishwanath NNP
I Pratap NNP
I Singh NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I biggest JJS
I certainty NN
O is VBZ
O that IN
I the DT
I elections NNS
O will MD
O be VB
I a DT
I vote NN
O for IN
O or CC
O against IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Gandhi NNP
O and CC
I his PRP<dollar>
I five CD
I years NNS
O in IN
I power NN
O -- =colon=
I five CD
I years NNS
O of IN
I ups NNS
O and CC
I downs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I promises VBZ
O and CC
I disappointments NNS
O and CC
I wide JJ
I fluctuations NNS
O in IN
I popularity NN
O <period> <period>
I Yesterday NN
O <comma> <comma>
I four CD
I days NNS
O after IN
I an DT
I unusual JJ
I parliamentary JJ
I defeat NN
O for IN
I the DT
I ruling NN
I party NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Gandhi NNP
O called VBD
I elections NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I lower JJR
I house NN
O of IN
I Parliament NNP
O on IN
I Nov<period> NNP
I 22 CD
I and CC
I 24 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I elections NNS
O will MD
O be VB
O held VBN
O in IN
I different JJ
I states NNS
O on IN
I one CD
O of IN
I the DT
I two CD
I days NNS
O <period> <period>
O <lparen> <lparen>
I The DT
I lower JJR
I house NN
B <apost>s POS
I five-year JJ
I term NN
O expires VBZ
O in IN
I January NNP
O <colon> =colon=
I the DT
I Parliament NNP
B <apost>s POS
I upper JJ
I house NN
O is VBZ
O appointed VBN
O <period> <period>
O <rparen> <rparen>
I The DT
I elections NNS
O will MD
O be VB
I a DT
I rigorous JJ
I test NN
O for IN
I the DT
I 45-year-old JJ
I prime JJ
I minister NN
O and CC
I Congress NNP
I <lparen> <lparen>
I I PRP
I <rparen> <rparen>
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O in IN
I various JJ
I forms NNS
O has VBZ
O ruled VBN
O for IN
O 40 CD
O of IN
I India NNP
I <apost>s POS
O 42 CD
O years NNS
O of IN
I independence NN
O <period> <period>
O After IN
I a DT
I landslide NN
I win NN
O in IN
I 1984 CD
O in IN
I polls NNS
O held VBN
O after IN
I the DT
I assassination NN
O of IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I mother NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Indira NNP
I Gandhi NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Gandhi NNP
O saw VBD
I his PRP<dollar>
I popularity NN
O begin VB
I a DT
I roller NN
I coaster NN
I ride NN
O <period> <period>
I His PRP<dollar>
I early JJ
I promises NNS
O to TO
O make VB
I India NNP
B a DT
I modern JJ
I nation NN
O remain VB
O bogged VBD
O down RB
O in IN
I bloated JJ
I bureaucracy NN
O <period> <period>
I His PRP<dollar>
I pledge NN
O to TO
O clean VB
O up IN
I local JJ
I administration NN
O and CC
I Indian NNP
I politics NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O including VBG
I his PRP<dollar>
I own JJ
I party NN
O <comma> <comma>
O went VBD
O unfulfilled JJ
O <period> <period>
I His PRP<dollar>
I <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Clean NNP
I <quote> <quote>
I image NN
O was VBD
O muddied VBN
O by IN
I an DT
I arms-kickback NN
I scandal NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O will MD
O be VB
I a DT
I major JJ
I campaign NN
I issue NN
O <period> <period>
I Some DT
I analysts NNS
O predict VBP
I that DT
I disappointment NN
O in IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Gandhi NNP
B <apost>s POS
I spent VBD
I pledge NN
O to TO
O reduce VB
I corruption NN
O and CC
I heavy-handed JJ
I local JJ
I government NN
O will MD
O crest VB
O at IN
I the DT
I polls NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I There EX
O <apost>s VBZ
I a DT
I wide JJ
I feeling NN
O of IN
I indignation NN
O across IN
I the DT
I country NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Bhabani NNP
I Sen NNP
I Gupta NNP
O of IN
I the DT
I Center NNP
O for IN
I Policy NNP
I Research NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I New NNP
I Delhi NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O think VBP
I the DT
I people NNS
O will MD
O be VB
O judging VBG
I the DT
I regime NN
O by IN
I a DT
I petty JJ
I policeman NN
O <comma> <comma>
O by IN
I a DT
I corrupt JJ
I revenue NN
I collector NN
O <period> <period>
I This DT
O could MD
O be VB
I a DT
I big JJ
I protest NN
O against IN
I an DT
I administrative JJ
I failure NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Even RB
O if IN
I the DT
I Congress NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I I PRP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O retains VBZ
I control NN
O of IN
I the DT
I government NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Gandhi NNP
B <apost>s POS
I ability NN
O to TO
O push VB
O through IN
I major JJ
I initiatives NNS
O might MD
O be VB
O hobbled VBN
O by IN
I a DT
I thinner JJR
I majority NN
O <period> <period>
I Economic JJ
I analysts NNS
O call VBP
I his PRP<dollar>
I trail-blazing JJ
I liberalization NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Indian NNP
I economy NN
O incomplete JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I many JJ
O are VBP
O hoping VBG
O for IN
I major JJ
I new JJ
I liberalizations NNS
O if IN
I he PRP
O is VBZ
O returned VBN
O firmly RB
O to TO
I power VB
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Lok NNP
I Sabha NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I lower JJR
I house NN
O of IN
I Parliament NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O has VBZ
I 542 CD
I elected VBN
O and CC
I two CD
I appointed VBN
O seats NNS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I 1984 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Congress NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I I PRP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O captured VBN
I 405 CD
I seats NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I largest JJS
I victory NN
O in IN
I the DT
I history NN
O of IN
I Indian NNP
I democracy NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I landslide NN
O was VBD
O fueled VBN
O by IN
I panic NN
B that WDT
O prevailed VBD
O in IN
I India NNP
O at IN
I the DT
I time NN
O <period> <period>
I Mrs<period> NNP
I Gandhi NNP
O had VBD
O been VBN
O assassinated VBN
O by IN
I separatist JJ
I Sikhs NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I many JJ
I Indians NNPS
O feared VBD
I their PRP<dollar>
I country NN
O might MD
O split VB
O apart RB
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I the DT
I previous JJ
I three CD
I general JJ
I elections NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I similar JJ
I national JJ
I issues NNS
O clinched VBD
I the DT
I vote NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I 1971 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Congress NNP
I Party NNP
O won VBD
O after IN
I India NNP
B <apost>s POS
I victory NN
O in IN
I the DT
I Bangladesh NNP
I war NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I 1977 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I Mrs<period> NNP
I Gandhi NNP
O was VBD
O thrown VBN
O out IN
O of IN
I office NN
O after IN
I her PRP<dollar>
I 19-month JJ
I emergency NN
I rule NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O in IN
I 1980 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O after IN
I her PRP<dollar>
I successors NNS
O made VBD
I a DT
I mess NN
O of IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I three CD
I years NNS
O in IN
I power NN
O <comma> <comma>
I she PRP
O was VBD
O restored VBN
O to TO
I office NN
O <period> <period>
I Most JJS
I political JJ
I analysts NNS
O say VBP
O that IN
O if IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Gandhi NNP
B <apost>s POS
I opposition NN
O unites VBZ
O to TO
O field VB
I single JJ
I candidates NNS
O in IN
I most RBS
I precincts NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Congress NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I I PRP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O will MD
O lose VB
O big JJ
O <period> <period>
O But CC
O if IN
I the DT
I opposition NN
O remains VBZ
O fractured VBN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Congress NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I I PRP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O could MD
O win VB
I a DT
I small JJ
I majority NN
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
O lead VB
I a DT
I coalition NN
I government NN
O <period> <period>
I Chimanbhai NNP
I Mehta NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I parliamentarian NN
I and CC
I former JJ
I Gandhi NNP
I ally NN
O <comma> <comma>
O predicts VBZ
I Congress NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I I PRP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O will MD
O win VB
I only RB
I 150 CD
I seats NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I quarter NN
O of IN
I the DT
I house NN
O <comma> <comma>
O if IN
I the DT
I opposition NN
O fields VBZ
I single JJ
I candidates NNS
O in IN
I 80 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I the DT
I races NNS
O <period> <period>
I Analysts NNS
O say VBP
I the DT
I opposition NN
O will MD
O struggle VB
I this DT
I week NN
O to TO
O unite VB
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I its PRP<dollar>
I success NN
O will MD
O be VB
O clear JJ
O only RB
O when WRB
I it PRP
O announces VBZ
I its PRP<dollar>
I final JJ
I list NN
O of IN
I parliamentary JJ
I candidates NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I arms-kickback NN
I scandal NN
O is VBZ
O likely JJ
O to TO
O be VB
I one CD
O of IN
I the DT
I big JJ
I talking NN
I points NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I campaign NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I it PRP
O <apost>s VBZ
O unclear JJ
O how WRB
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O viewed VBN
O by IN
I average JJ
I Indian NNP
I voters NNS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I 1986 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I India NNP
O signed VBD
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>4 CD
I billion CD
I contract NN
O with IN
I AB NNP
I Bofors NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I unit NN
O of IN
I Nobel NNP
I Industries NNP
I Sweden NNP
I AB NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
O purchase VB
I 400 CD
I artillery NN
I pieces NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I contract NN
O was VBD
O negotiated VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I countries NNS
B <apost> POS
I two CD
I prime JJ
I ministers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O was VBD
O supposed VBN
O to TO
O be VB
O free JJ
O of IN
I commissions NNS
O or CC
I agents NNS
B <apost> POS
I costs NNS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I April NNP
I 1987 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I evidence NN
O surfaced VBD
O that IN
I commissions NNS
O were VBD
O paid VBN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I opposition NN
O charged VBN
O that IN
I the DT
I money NN
O was VBD
O used VBN
O to TO
O bribe VB
I Indian NNP
I government NN
I officials NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I allegation NN
O denied VBN
O by IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Gandhi NNP
B <apost>s POS
I administration NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I many NN
O of IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I statements NNS
O on IN
I the DT
I issue NN
O in IN
I Parliament NNP
O subsequently RB
O were VBD
O proven VBN
O wrong JJ
O by IN
I documentary NN
I evidence NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I scandal NN
O has VBZ
O faded VBN
O and CC
O flared VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I recent JJ
I disclosures NNS
O propelled VBN
I it PRP
O back RB
O onto IN
I the DT
I front NN
I pages NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I that DT
O has VBZ
O helped VBN
O galvanize VB
I the DT
I opposition NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
B last JJ
I week NN
O blocked VBD
I passage NN
O of IN
I two CD
I constitutional JJ
I amendment NN
I bills NNS
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O was VBD
I the DT
I first JJ
I time NN
O in IN
I 20 CD
I years NNS
O that IN
I such JJ
I government NN
I bills NNS
O were VBD
O defeated VBN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I a DT
I country NN
O where WRB
I a DT
I bribe NN
O is VBZ
O needed VBN
O to TO
O get VB
I a DT
I phone NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I job NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O even RB
O into IN
I a DT
I school NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I name NN
I Bofors NNP
O has VBZ
O become VBN
I a DT
I potent JJ
I rallying NN
I cry NN
O against IN
I the DT
I government NN
O <period> <period>
I That DT
O illustrates VBZ
I the DT
I kind NN
O of IN
I disappointment NN
B many JJ
I Indians NNPS
O feel VBP
O toward IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Gandhi NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I whom WP
B they PRP
O zestfully RB
O elected VBD
O and CC
O enthusiastically RB
O supported VBN
O in IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I first JJ
I two CD
I years NNS
O in IN
I power NN
O <period> <period>
I His PRP<dollar>
I term NN
O has VBZ
O produced VBN
I no DT
I spectacular JJ
I failures NNS
O in IN
I politics NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I the DT
I economy NN
O or CC
O on IN
I the DT
I military JJ
I front NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O has VBZ
O chalked VBN
O up IN
I some DT
I successes NNS
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I the DT
I average JJ
I Indian NNP
O had VBD
I tremendous JJ
I hope NN
O in IN
I the DT
I youthful JJ
I leader NN
O and CC
I his PRP<dollar>
I promise NN
O to TO
O make VB
O both DT
I government NN
O and CC
I the DT
I ruling NN
I party NN
O more RBR
O effective JJ
O and CC
O less RBR
O corrupt JJ
O <period> <period>
I His PRP<dollar>
I failures NNS
O in IN
I those DT
I two CD
I areas NNS
O deeply RB
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O sometimes RB
O bitterly RB
O <comma> <comma>
O disappointed VBN
I many JJ
I Indians NNPS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O like IN
I the DT
I Congress NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I I PRP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Sooraji NNP
I Jath NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I farmer NN
O in IN
I the DT
I western JJ
I state NN
O of IN
I Gujarat NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I Congress NNP
I government NN
O is VBZ
O taking VBG
I the DT
I farmers NNS
B <apost> POS
I bread NN
O and CC
O not RB
O giving VBG
I us PRP
B any DT
I support NN
O <period> <period>
O When WRB
I there EX
O are VBP
I well JJ
I problems NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I light NN
I problems NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I road NN
I problems NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I government NN
O tells VBZ
I us PRP
O to TO
O forget VB
I it PRP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I greatest JJS
I thing NN
O going VBG
O for IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Gandhi NNP
O and CC
O the DT
O Congress NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I I PRP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O Party NNP
O is VBZ
I the DT
I poor JJ
I reputation NN
O of IN
I the DT
I opposition NN
O <period> <period>
O Even RB
O if IN
I it PRP
O unites VBZ
O for IN
I the DT
I elections NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I its PRP<dollar>
I coherence NN
O is VBZ
O likely JJ
O to TO
O be VB
O temporary JJ
O <period> <period>
O When WRB
I the DT
I Congress NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I I PRP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O lost VBD
I the DT
I 1977 CD
I election NN
O <comma> <comma>
O following VBG
I Mrs<period> NNP
I Gandhi NNP
B <apost>s POS
I hated VBD
I emergency NN
I rule NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I similar JJ
I coalition NN
O took VBD
I power NN
O and CC
O then RB
O disintegrated VBD
O <period> <period>
I Many JJ
I Indians NNPS
O fear NN
I a DT
I repeat NN
O of IN
I that DT
I experience NN
O <period> <period>
I March NNP
I 24 CD
I <comma> <comma>
I 1986 CD
I =colon= =colon=
I AB NNP
I Bofors NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I unit NN
O of IN
I Nobel NNP
I Industries NNP
I Sweden NNP
I AB NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O enters VBZ
O into IN
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>4 CD
I billion CD
I contract NN
O with IN
I India NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Defense NNP
I Ministry NNP
O to TO
O supply VB
I 400 CD
I Bofors NNP
I FH-77B NNP
I 155-mm JJ
I field NN
I howitzer NN
I guns NNS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I 1985 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I Prime NNP
I Minister NNP
I Rajiv NNP
I Gandhi NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I talks NNS
O with IN
I then RB
I Swedish NNP
I Prime NNP
I Minister NNP
I Olof NNP
I Palme NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O imposed VBD
I the DT
I condition NN
O that IN
I the DT
I contract NN
O have VBP
I no DT
I middlemen NNS
O <period> <period>
I April NNP
I 16 CD
I <comma> <comma>
I 1987 CD
I =colon= =colon=
I Swedish NNP
I National NNP
I Radio NNP
O reports NNS
O that IN
I about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 40 CD
I million CD
O -- =colon=
I nearly RB
I 3 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I the DT
I total JJ
I contract NN
O -- =colon=
O was VBD
O paid VBN
O by IN
I Bofors NNP
O as IN
I commissions NNS
O to TO
I middlemen NNS
O <period> <period>
I June NNP
I 1 CD
I <comma> <comma>
I 1987 CD
I =colon= =colon=
I Sweden NNP
B <apost>s POS
I National NNP
I Audit NNP
I Bureau NNP
O releases NNS
I its PRP<dollar>
I report NN
O confirming VBG
I payment NN
O of IN
I about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 40 CD
I million CD
O to TO
I unidentified JJ
I Indians NNPS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I report NN
O says VBZ
O that IN
I investigations NNS
O were VBD
O severely RB
O hampered VBN
O by IN
I lack NN
O of IN
I cooperation NN
O from IN
I Bofors NNP
O <period> <period>
I Bofors NNP
O says VBZ
I it PRP
O ca MD
O n<apost>t RB
O disclose VB
I the DT
I names NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I middlemen NNS
O because IN
I it PRP
O would MD
O jeopardize VB
I industrial JJ
I confidentiality NN
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I portion NN
O of IN
I the DT
I report NN
O containing VBG
I names NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I middlemen NNS
O is VBZ
O withheld VBN
O by IN
I officials NNS
O citing VBG
I bank NN
I secrecy NN
I requirements NNS
O <period> <period>
I Aug<period> NNP
I 6 CD
I <comma> <comma>
I 1987 CD
I =colon= =colon=
I Prime NNP
I Minister NNP
I Gandhi NNP
O tells VBZ
I the DT
I Indian NNP
I Parliament NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O <period><period><period> =colon=
O neither DT
I I PRP
O nor CC
I any DT
I member NN
O of IN
I my PRP<dollar>
I family NN
O has VBZ
O received VBN
I any DT
I consideration NN
O in IN
I these DT
I transactions NNS
O <period> <period>
I That DT
O is VBZ
I the DT
I truth NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Aug<period> NNP
I 26 CD
I <comma> <comma>
I 1987 CD
I =colon= =colon=
I Bofors NNP
O admits VBZ
I payments NNS
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 41 CD
I million CD
O to TO
I middlemen NNS
O <period> <period>
I April NNP
I 22 CD
I <comma> <comma>
I 1988 CD
I =colon= =colon=
I The DT
I Hindu NNP
I newspaper NN
O publishes VBZ
I facsimiles NNS
O of IN
I bank NN
I documents NNS
O for IN
I foreign-exchange JJ
I remittances NNS
O and CC
I letters NNS
O between IN
I Bofors NNP
O and CC
I certain JJ
I private JJ
I companies NNS
O related VBN
O to TO
I the DT
I sale NN
O of IN
I the DT
I guns NNS
O to TO
I India NNP
O <period> <period>
I April NNP
I 26 CD
I <comma> <comma>
I 1988 CD
I =colon= =colon=
I A DT
I parliamentary JJ
I investigative JJ
I committee NN
O dominated VBN
O by IN
O the DT
O Congress NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I I PRP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O Party NNP
O concludes VBZ
O that IN
I there EX
O were VBD
I no DT
I middlemen NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I deal NN
O and CC
I no DT
I payment NN
O to TO
I any DT
I Indian NNP
I individual NN
I or CC
I company NN
O <period> <period>
I July NNP
I 18 CD
I <comma> <comma>
I 1989 CD
I =colon= =colon=
I The DT
I comptroller NN
I and CC
I auditor-general NN
O of IN
I India NNP
O reports VBZ
I serious JJ
I lapses NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I government NN
B <apost>s POS
I technical JJ
I and CC
I financial JJ
I evaluation NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Bofors NNP
I deal NN
O <period> <period>
I Sept<period> NNP
I 15 CD
I <comma> <comma>
I 1989 CD
I =colon= =colon=
O Retired JJ
O army NN
O Chief NNP
O of IN
I Staff NNP
O Krishnaswami NNP
O Sundarji NNP
O discloses VBZ
O in IN
I an DT
I interview NN
O that IN
I he PRP
O suggested VBD
O in IN
I May NNP
I 1987 CD
O that IN
I the DT
I government NN
O cancel NN
I the DT
I Bofors NNP
I contract NN
O <period> <period>
O According VBG
O to TO
I Gen<period> NNP
I Sundarji NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I that WDT
O would MD
O have VB
O forced VBN
I Bofors NNP
O to TO
O disclose VB
I the DT
I names NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I middlemen NNS
B who WP
O received VBD
I kickbacks NNS
O from IN
I the DT
I company NN
O <period> <period>
I His PRP<dollar>
I recommendation NN
O was VBD
O rejected VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I government NN
O <period> <period>
I Oct<period> NNP
I 9<period> CD
I 1989 CD
I =colon= =colon=
I The DT
I Hindu NNP
I newspaper NN
O publishes VBZ
I the DT
I withheld VBN
I portion NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Swedish NNP
I National NNP
I Audit NNP
I Bureau NNP
B <apost>s POS
I report NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I disclosures NNS
O state VBP
O that IN
I commissions NNS
O were VBD
O paid VBN
O by IN
I Bofors NNP
O to TO
I an DT
I Indian NNP
I agent NN
O of IN
I the DT
I arms NNS
I company NN
O <period> <period>
I Parsow NNP
I Partnership NNP
I Ltd<period> NNP
O and CC
I Elkhorn NNP
I Partners NNP
I L<period>P<period> NNP
O said VBD
I they PRP
O may MD
O seek VB
I proposals NNS
O from IN
I third JJ
I parties NNS
O relating VBG
O to TO
I a DT
I sale NN
I or CC
I restructuring NN
O of IN
I CACI NNP
I International NNP
I Inc NNP
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I a DT
I filing NN
O with IN
I the DT
I Securities NNP
I and CC
I Exchange NNP
I Commission NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Parsow NNP
I and CC
I Elkhorn NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O together RB
O hold VB
I 8<period>685 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I CACI NNP
B <apost>s POS
I common JJ
I shares NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I they PRP
O think VBP
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O in IN
I the DT
I best JJS
I interest NN
O of IN
I CACI NNP
I stockholders NNS
O that IN
I the DT
I company NN
O be VB
O sold VBN
O <period> <period>
I CACI NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O based VBN
O in IN
I Arlington NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Va<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I it PRP
O had VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O seen VBN
I the DT
I filing NN
O by IN
I Parsow NNP
I and CC
I Elkhorn NNP
O and CC
O therefore RB
O had VBD
I no DT
I comment NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I partnerships NNS
O said VBD
I they PRP
O may MD
O seek VB
I board NN
I representation NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I they PRP
O may MD
O seek VB
I the DT
I support NN
O of IN
I CACI NNP
B <apost>s POS
I board NN
O and CC
I other JJ
I major JJ
I shareholders NNS
O in IN
I connection NN
O with IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I plans NNS
O <period> <period>
O According VBG
O to TO
I the DT
I filing NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Parsow NNP
I and CC
I Elkhorn NNP
O are VBP
O based VBN
O in IN
I Elkhorn NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Neb<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O are VBP
O controlled VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I same JJ
I general JJ
I partner NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Alan NNP
I S<period> NNP
I Parsow NNP
O <period> <period>
I Their PRP<dollar>
I combined VBN
I stake NN
O consists VBZ
O of IN
I 880<comma>500 CD
I CACI NNP
I common JJ
I shares NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O including VBG
I 86<comma>500 CD
I shares NNS
O bought VBD
O in IN
I the DT
I past JJ
I 60 CD
I days NNS
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>3125 CD
I to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>4375 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <period> <period>
I Additional JJ
I shares NNS
O may MD
O be VB
O bought VBN
O or CC
O sold VBN
O in IN
I the DT
I open JJ
I market NN
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I private JJ
I transactions NNS
O or CC
O otherwise RB
O <comma> <comma>
O depending VBG
O on IN
I market NN
I conditions NNS
O and CC
I other JJ
I factors NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I inverse JJ
I trading NN
I relationship NN
O between IN
I bonds NNS
I and CC
I stocks NNS
O was VBD
O interrupted VBN
I yesterday NN
O as IN
I bonds NNS
O fell VBD
O despite IN
I a DT
I modest JJ
I decline NN
O in IN
I stock NN
I prices NNS
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I bond NN
I investors NNS
O continue VBP
O to TO
O keep VB
I a DT
I close NN
I watch NN
O on IN
I the DT
I jittery JJ
I stock NN
I market NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I early JJ
I trading NN
O <comma> <comma>
I investors NNS
O were VBD
O bidding NN
I bond NN
I prices NNS
O higher JJR
O as IN
I stocks NNS
O tumbled VBD
O and CC
I fears NNS
O mounted VBN
O that IN
I Friday NNP
B <apost>s POS
I stock NN
I market NN
I debacle NN
O would MD
O be VB
O repeated VBN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I a DT
I partial JJ
I recovery NN
O in IN
I the DT
I Dow NNP
I Jones NNP
I Industrial NNP
I Average NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O had VBD
O been VBN
O down RB
I more JJR
I than IN
I 60 CD
I points NNS
O in IN
I midmorning NN
O <comma> <comma>
O dashed VBD
I those DT
I expectations NNS
O <period> <period>
I Treasury NN
I bonds NNS
O also RB
O were VBD
O hurt VBN
O late RB
O in IN
I the DT
I day NN
O by IN
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 4 CD
I billion CD
I offering NN
O by IN
I the DT
I Tennessee NNP
I Valley NNP
I Authority NNP
O and CC
I the DT
I prospect NN
O of IN
I a DT
I huge JJ
I amount NN
O of IN
I new JJ
I agency NN
I debt NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Bond NNP
I investors NNS
O were VBD
O hoping VBG
O that IN
I stock NN
I prices NNS
O would MD
O continue VB
O to TO
O fall VB
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Roger NNP
I Early NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I vice NN
I president NN
O at IN
I Federated NNP
I Investors NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Pittsburgh NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O When WRB
I stocks NNS
O stabilized VBN
O <comma> <comma>
I that WDT
O was VBD
I a DT
I disappointment NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Meanwhile RB
O <comma> <comma>
O for IN
I the DT
I second JJ
I straight JJ
I day NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I bond NN
I market NN
O paid VBD
I little JJ
I attention NN
O to TO
I the DT
I Federal NNP
I Reserve NNP
B <apost>s POS
I open JJ
I market NN
I operations NNS
O <period> <period>
I Fed JJ
I officials NNS
O injected VBN
I more JJR
I cash NN
O into IN
I the DT
I banking NN
I system NN
O by IN
O arranging VBG
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>5 CD
I billion CD
O of IN
I repurchase NN
I agreements NNS
O during IN
I the DT
I usual JJ
I pre-noon NN
I intervention NN
I period NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I move NN
O was VBD
O meant VBN
O to TO
O keep VB
I a DT
I lid NN
O on IN
I interest NN
I rates NNS
O and CC
O to TO
O boost VB
I investor NN
I confidence NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I intervention NN
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O friendly JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O meaning NN
O that IN
I they PRP
O really RB
O did VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O have VB
O to TO
O do VB
I it PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Maria NNP
I Fiorini NNP
I Ramirez NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I money-market JJ
I economist NN
O at IN
I Drexel NNP
I Burnham NNP
I Lambert NNP
I Inc NNP
O <period> <period>
I She PRP
O said VBD
I a DT
I more RBR
I aggressive JJ
I move NN
O was VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O needed VBN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Fed NNP
O also RB
O appears VBZ
O reluctant JJ
O to TO
O ease VB
I credit NN
I conditions NNS
O further JJ
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O already RB
O has VBZ
O allowed VBN
I the DT
I closely RB
I watched VBN
I federal JJ
I funds NNS
I rate NN
O to TO
O decline VB
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
I percentage NN
I point NN
O to TO
I about IN
I 8 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>4 CD
I <percent> NN
O from IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I previous JJ
I target NN
I level NN
O of IN
I about IN
I 9 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I rate NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
B banks NNS
O charge VBP
I each DT
I other NN
O on IN
I overnight JJ
I loans NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
O considered VBN
I an DT
I early JJ
I signal NN
O of IN
I changes NNS
O in IN
I Fed NNP
I policy NN
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O ended VBD
O at IN
I about IN
I 8 CD
I 11<bslash><fslash>16 CD
I <percent> NN
B yesterday NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O was VBD
O as RB
O low JJ
O as IN
I 8 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>2 CD
I <percent> NN
B Monday NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Treasury NNP
B <apost>s POS
I benchmark NN
I 30-year JJ
I bond NN
O fell VBD
I more JJR
I than IN
I 1<bslash><fslash>2 CD
I point NN
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I over IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 5 NN
O for IN
I each DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<comma>000 CD
I face NN
I amount NN
O <comma> <comma>
O while IN
I the DT
I yield NN
O moved VBD
O above IN
I 8 CD
I <percent> NN
O for IN
I the DT
I first JJ
I time NN
O since IN
I Thursday NNP
O <period> <period>
I Investment-grade JJ
I corporate JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I municipal JJ
I and CC
I mortgage-backed JJ
I securities NNS
O also RB
O fell VBD
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I most RBS
I junk NN
I bonds NNS
O closed VBD
O unchanged JJ
O after IN
O opening NN
O slightly RB
O higher JJR
O on IN
I bargain-hunting NN
O by IN
I institutional JJ
I investors NNS
O <period> <period>
I Some DT
I so-called JJ
I high-quality JJ
I junk NN
I issues NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O such JJ
O as IN
I R<period>H<period> NNP
I Macy NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co<period> NNP
B <apost>s POS
I 14 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>2 CD
I <percent> NN
I subordinated VBD
I debentures NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O rose VBD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Macy NNP
B <apost>s POS
I issue NN
O closed VBD
O up IN
I about IN
I one CD
I point NN
O at IN
I a DT
I bid NN
I price NN
O of IN
I 97 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I TVA NNP
B <apost>s POS
I public JJ
I debt NN
I offering NN
O was VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I first JJ
O in IN
I 15 CD
I years NNS
O <period> <period>
I Strong JJ
I investor NN
I demand NN
O prompted VBD
I it PRP
O to TO
O boost VB
I the DT
I size NN
O of IN
I the DT
I issue NN
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 3 CD
I billion CD
O <period> <period>
I Traders NNS
O said VBD
I hedging VBG
O related VBN
O to TO
I the DT
I TVA NNP
I pricing NN
O also RB
O pressured VBD
I Treasury NNP
I bonds NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Underwriters NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I TVA NNP
I bonds NNS
O reduced VBD
I their PRP<dollar>
I market NN
I risk NN
O by IN
O selling VBG
I Treasurys NNPS
O to TO
O cover VB
I at IN
I least JJS
I part NN
O of IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I <lparen> <lparen>
I TVA NNP
I <rparen> <rparen>
I holdings NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I James NNP
I R<period> NNP
I Capra NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I senior JJ
I vice NN
I president NN
O at IN
I Shearson NNP
I Lehman NNP
I Government NNP
I Securities NNP
I Inc NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I TVA NNP
I bonds NNS
O also RB
O <quote> <quote>
O served VBN
O to TO
O remind VB
I the DT
I market NN
O that IN
I there EX
O will MD
O be VB
I even RB
I more RBR
I new JJ
I supply NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Lawrence NNP
I N<period> NNP
I Leuzzi NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I managing VBG
I director NN
O at IN
I S<period>G<period> NNP
I Warburg NNP
I Securities NNPS
I <amp> CC
I Co NNP
O <period> <period>
I Today NN
B the DT
I Treasury NNP
O will MD
O announce VB
I the DT
I size NN
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I next JJ
I two-year JJ
I note NN
I sale NN
O and CC
I Resolution NNP
I Funding NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O will MD
O announce VB
I details NNS
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I first JJ
I bond NN
I offering NN
O <period> <period>
I Some DT
I traders NNS
O estimate VBP
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 9<period>75 CD
I billion CD
O of IN
I new JJ
I two-year JJ
I Treasurys NNPS
O will MD
O be VB
O sold VBN
I next JJ
I week NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I they PRP
O expect VBP
I Refcorp NNP
O to TO
O offer VB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 4 CD
I billion CD
I to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 6 CD
I billion CD
O of IN
I long-term JJ
I <quote> <quote>
I bailout NN
I <quote> <quote>
I bonds NNS
O <period> <period>
I Refcorp NNP
O was VBD
O created VBN
O to TO
O help VB
O fund VB
I the DT
I thrift NN
I bailout NN
O <period> <period>
I Another DT
I agency NN
I issue NN
O came VBD
O to TO
I market VB
B yesterday NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Office NNP
O of IN
I Finance NNP
O of IN
I the DT
I Federal NNP
I Home NNP
I Loan NNP
I Banks NNP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O priced VBD
I a DT
I four-part JJ
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>27 CD
I billion CD
I bond NN
I offering NN
O for IN
I the DT
I banks NNS
O to TO
O yield VB
I from IN
I 8<period>125 CD
I <percent> NN
I to TO
I 8<period>375 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I release NN
O of IN
I several JJ
I economic JJ
I reports NNS
O had VBD
I little JJ
I impact NN
O on IN
I the DT
I market NN
O <comma> <comma>
O including VBG
I a DT
I report NN
O that IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I trade NN
I deficit NN
O expanded VBN
O to TO
I a DT
I surprisingly RB
I wide JJ
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 10<period>77 CD
I billion CD
O in IN
I August NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O up IN
O from IN
I a DT
I revised VBN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 8<period>24 CD
I billion CD
O in IN
I July NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I August NNP
I gap NN
O was VBD
O expected VBN
O to TO
O have VB
O expanded VBN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 9<period>1 CD
I billion CD
O <period> <period>
I Treasury NNP
I Securities NNPS
I Treasury NN
I securities NNS
O were VBD
O essentially RB
O flat JJ
O to TO
I about IN
I 1<bslash><fslash>2 CD
I point NN
O lower JJR
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I benchmark NN
I 30-year JJ
I bond NN
O was VBD
O quoted VBN
O late RB
O at IN
I 100 CD
I 28<bslash><fslash>32 CD
O to TO
O yield VB
I 8<period>04 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O compared VBN
O with IN
I 101 CD
I 19<bslash><fslash>32 CD
O to TO
O yield VB
I 7<period>97 CD
I <percent> NN
B Monday NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I latest JJS
I 10-year JJ
I notes NNS
O were VBD
O quoted VBN
O late RB
O at IN
I 99 CD
I 25<bslash><fslash>32 CD
O to TO
O yield VB
I 8<period>01 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O compared VBN
O with IN
I 100 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>32 CD
O to TO
O yield VB
I 7<period>97 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I Short-term JJ
I rates NNS
O increased VBN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I discount NN
I rate NN
O on IN
I three-month JJ
I bills NNS
O rose VBD
O to TO
I 7<period>52 CD
I <percent> NN
O for IN
I a DT
I bond-equivalent JJ
I yield NN
O of IN
I 7<period>75 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I rate NN
O on IN
I six-month JJ
I bills NNS
O rose VBD
O to TO
I 7<period>53 CD
I <percent> NN
O for IN
I a DT
I bond-equivalent JJ
I yield NN
O of IN
I 7<period>92 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I Corporate JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I Other JJ
I Issues NNS
I Investment-grade JJ
I corporate JJ
I bonds NNS
O ended VBD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
I to TO
I 1<bslash><fslash>2 CD
I point NN
O lower JJR
O <comma> <comma>
O while IN
I most RBS
I junk NN
I bonds NNS
O ended VBD
O unchanged JJ
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I TVA NNP
B <apost>s POS
I huge JJ
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 4 CD
I billion CD
I offering NN
O dominated VBD
I attention NN
O in IN
I the DT
I new-issue JJ
I market NN
O <period> <period>
I TVA NNP
O offered VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2 CD
I billion CD
O of IN
I 30-year JJ
I bonds NNS
O priced VBN
O to TO
O yield VB
I 9<period>06 CD
I <percent> NN
O <colon> =colon=
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1 CD
I billion CD
O in IN
I 10-year JJ
I notes NNS
O priced VBN
O to TO
O yield VB
I 8<period>42 CD
I <percent> NN
O <colon> =colon=
O and CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1 CD
I billion CD
O in IN
I five-year JJ
I notes NNS
O priced VBN
O to TO
O yield VB
I 8<period>33 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I TVA NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O operates VBZ
I one CD
O of IN
I the DT
I nation NN
B <apost>s POS
I largest JJS
I electric JJ
I power NN
I systems NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
I a DT
I corporation NN
O wholly RB
O owned VBD
O by IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I government NN
O <period> <period>
I Yesterday NN
B <apost>s POS
I bond NN
I sale NN
O was VBD
I part NN
O of IN
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 6<period>7 CD
I billion CD
I refinancing NN
I plan NN
O to TO
O pay VB
O off IN
I high-interest JJ
I debt NN
B the DT
I TVA NNP
O owes VBZ
I the DT
I Federal NNP
I Financing NNP
I Bank NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I arm NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Treasury NNP
O <period> <period>
O Meanwhile RB
O <comma> <comma>
I Lockheed NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O priced VBD
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 300 CD
I million CD
I note NN
I offering NN
O to TO
O yield VB
I 9<period>39 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I Mortgage-Backed JJ
I Securities NNPS
I The DT
I derivative JJ
I mortgage-backed JJ
I market NN
O revived VBN
O after IN
I a DT
I brief JJ
I hiatus NN
O as IN
I two CD
I new JJ
I Remics NNS
O totaling VBG
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 850 CD
I million CD
O were VBD
O offered VBN
O and CC
I talk VB
O circulated VBD
O about IN
I two CD
I more JJR
I issues NNS
B that WDT
O could MD
O be VB
O priced VBN
I today NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I revival NN
O of IN
I the DT
I real JJ
I estate NN
I mortgage NN
I investment NN
I conduit NN
I market NN
O reflected VBD
I the DT
I relative JJ
I calm NN
O in IN
I the DT
I mortgage NN
I market NN
O after IN
I two CD
I days NNS
O of IN
I volatile JJ
I trading NN
O <period> <period>
I Dealers NNS
O noted VBD
O that IN
I it PRP
O <apost>s VBZ
O difficult JJ
O to TO
O structure VB
I new JJ
I Remics NNS
O when WRB
I prices NNS
O are VBP
O moving VBG
O widely RB
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I two CD
I Remics NNS
O priced VBN
O were VBD
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 500 CD
I million CD
I Federal NNP
I Home NNP
I Loan NNP
I Mortgage NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
I issue NN
O underwritten VBN
O by IN
I Salomon NNP
I Brothers NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O and CC
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 350 CD
I million CD
I Federal NNP
I National NNP
I Mortgage NNP
I Association NNP
I deal NN
O underwritten VBN
O by IN
I Greenwich NNP
I Capital NNP
I Markets NNPS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Remic NNP
I issuance NN
O supported VBD
I prices NNS
O of IN
I Freddie NNP
I Mac NNP
O and CC
I Fannie NNP
I Mae NNP
I securities NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O held VBD
O up IN
O better JJR
O than IN
I Government NNP
I National NNP
I Mortgage NNP
I Association NNP
I securities NNS
O during IN
I an DT
I afternoon NN
I sell-off NN
O <period> <period>
I Ginnie NNP
I Mae NNP
I 9 CD
I <percent> NN
I securities NNS
O for IN
I November NNP
I delivery NN
O ended VBD
O at IN
I 97 CD
I 29<bslash><fslash>32 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O down RB
I 7<bslash><fslash>32 CD
O <colon> =colon=
I 9 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>2 CD
I <percent> NN
I securities NNS
O at IN
I 99 CD
I 31<bslash><fslash>32 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O down RB
I 6<bslash><fslash>32 CD
O <colon> =colon=
O and CC
I 10 CD
I <percent> NN
I securities NNS
O at IN
I 101 CD
I 29<bslash><fslash>32 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O down RB
I 5<bslash><fslash>32 CD
O <period> <period>
I Freddie NNP
I Mac NNP
I 9 CD
I <percent> NN
I securities NNS
O were VBD
O at IN
I 97 CD
I 5<bslash><fslash>32 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O down RB
I 3<bslash><fslash>32 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Ginnie NNP
I Mae NNP
I 9 CD
I <percent> NN
I issue NN
O was VBD
O yielding VBG
I 9<period>43 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I a DT
I 12-year JJ
I average JJ
I life NN
I assumption NN
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
I the DT
I spread NN
O above IN
I the DT
I Treasury NNP
I 10-year JJ
I note NN
O held VBN
O at IN
I 1<period>42 CD
I percentage NN
I points NNS
O <period> <period>
I Municipals NNS
I Confusion NN
O over IN
I the DT
I near-term JJ
I trend NN
O for IN
I rates NNS
O dominated VBD
I the DT
I municipal JJ
I arena NN
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
I gyrations NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O continued VBD
O to TO
O buffet VB
I bonds NNS
O <period> <period>
I Long NNP
I tax-exempt JJ
I dollar NN
I bonds NNS
O were VBD
O mostly RB
O flat JJ
O to TO
I 3<bslash><fslash>8 CD
I point NN
O lower JJR
O after IN
I a DT
I whipsaw JJ
I session NN
O of IN
O moving VBG
O inversely RB
O to TO
I stocks NNS
O in IN
I modest JJ
I dealer-led JJ
I trading NN
O <period> <period>
I Prices NNS
O of IN
I pre-refunded JJ
I municipal JJ
I bonds NNS
O were VBD
O capped VBN
O by IN
I news NN
O that IN
I Chemical NNP
I Securities NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
I agent NN
O for IN
I a DT
I customer NN
O <comma> <comma>
O will MD
O accept VB
I bids NNS
B today NN
O for IN
I two CD
I large JJ
I lists NNS
O of IN
I bonds NNS
B that WDT
O include VBP
I many JJ
I such JJ
I issues NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I lists NNS
O total JJ
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 654<period>5 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I Pre-refunded JJ
I bonds NNS
O are VBP
O called VBN
O at IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I earliest JJS
I call NN
I date NN
O with IN
I the DT
I escrowed VBN
I proceeds NNS
O of IN
I another DT
I bond NN
I issue NN
O <period> <period>
O Meanwhile RB
O <comma> <comma>
I several JJ
I new JJ
I issues NNS
O were VBD
O priced VBN
O <period> <period>
I Underwriters NNS
O led VBN
O by IN
I PaineWebber NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O set VBD
I preliminary JJ
I pricing NN
O for IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 144<period>4 CD
I million CD
O of IN
I California NNP
I Health NNP
I Facilities NNP
I Financing NNP
I Authority NNP
I revenue NN
I bonds NNS
O for IN
I Kaiser NNP
I Permanente NNP
O <period> <period>
I Tentative JJ
I reoffering NN
I yields NNS
O were VBD
O set VBN
O from IN
I 6<period>25 CD
I <percent> NN
O in IN
I 1993 CD
O to TO
I 7<period>227 CD
I <percent> NN
O in IN
I 2018 CD
O <period> <period>
O As IN
I part NN
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I College NNP
I Savings NNP
I Plan NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Connecticut NNP
O offered VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 100<period>4 CD
I million CD
O of IN
I general JJ
I obligation NN
I capital NN
I appreciation NN
I bonds NNS
O priced VBN
O to TO
O yield VB
O to TO
I maturity NN
O from IN
I 6<period>25 CD
I <percent> NN
O in IN
I 1994 CD
O to TO
I 6<period>90 CD
I <percent> NN
O in IN
I 2006 CD
I <comma> <comma>
I 2007 CD
I and CC
I 2009 CD
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I Chemical NNP
I Securities NNPS
I group NN
O won VBD
O a DT
O <dollar> <dollar>
O 100 CD
O million CD
O Oregon NNP
O general JJ
O obligation NN
I veterans NNS
I <apost> POS
O tax NN
O note NN
O issue NN
O due JJ
I Nov<period> NNP
I 1 CD
I <comma> <comma>
I 1990 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I 6 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>4 CD
I <percent> NN
I notes NNS
O yield VBP
I 6<period>25 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I Foreign JJ
I Bonds NNS
I West JJ
I German JJ
I government NN
I bond NN
I prices NNS
O took VBD
I a DT
I wild JJ
I roller-coaster NN
I ride NN
O <comma> <comma>
O pulled VBD
O down RB
O by IN
I Monday NNP
B <apost>s POS
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I stock NN
I market NN
I gains NNS
O then RB
O up IN
O by IN
I a DT
I wider-than-expected JJ
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I trade NN
I deficit NN
O and CC
I falling VBG
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I stock NN
I prices NNS
O <period> <period>
I West NNP
I Germany NNP
B <apost>s POS
I 7 CD
I <percent> NN
I bond NN
O due JJ
I October NNP
I 1999 CD
O was VBD
O at IN
I 99<period>95 CD
B late JJ
I yesterday NN
O <comma> <comma>
O off IN
I 0<period>10 CD
I point NN
O from IN
I Monday NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
O yield VB
I 7<period>01 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I 6 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>4 CD
I <percent> NN
I notes NNS
O due JJ
I April NNP
I 1994 CD
O were VBD
O up IN
I 0<period>10 CD
I point NN
O to TO
I 97<period>85 CD
O to TO
O yield VB
I 7<period>31 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I British JJ
I government NN
I bonds NNS
O surged VBD
O on IN
I renewed VBN
I volatility NN
O in IN
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Treasury NNP
I 11 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>4 CD
I <percent> NN
I bond NN
O due JJ
I 2003<bslash><fslash>2007 CD
O rose VBD
I 23<bslash><fslash>32 CD
O to TO
I 112 CD
I 10<bslash><fslash>32 CD
O to TO
O yield VB
I 10<period>03 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I Japanese JJ
I bonds NNS
O ended VBD
O weaker JJR
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I benchmark NN
I No<period> NN
I 111 CD
I 4<period>6 CD
I <percent> NN
I bond NN
O due JJ
I 1998 CD
O ended VBD
O on IN
I brokers NNS
B <apost> POS
I screens NNS
O at IN
I a DT
I price NN
O of IN
I 96 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O off IN
I 0<period>15 CD
I point NN
O to TO
O yield VB
I 5<period>27 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I House-Senate NNP
I conference NN
O approved VBD
I an DT
I estimated VBN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 67 CD
I billion CD
I fiscal JJ
I 1990 CD
I spending NN
I bill NN
B that WDT
O provides VBZ
I a DT
I 28 CD
I <percent> NN
I increase NN
O for IN
I space NN
I research NN
I and CC
I development NN
O and CC
O incorporates VBZ
I far-reaching JJ
I provisions NNS
O affecting VBG
I the DT
I federal JJ
I mortgage NN
I market NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I current JJ
I ceiling NN
O on IN
I home NN
I loans NNS
O insured VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I Federal NNP
I Housing NNP
I Administration NNP
O would MD
O be VB
O increased VBN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 124<comma>875 CD
O <period> <period>
O Separately RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I bill NN
O gives VBZ
I authority NN
O to TO
I the DT
I Bush NNP
I administration NN
O to TO
O facilitate VB
I the DT
I refinancing NN
O of IN
I federally RB
I subsidized JJ
I loans NNS
O for IN
I low-income JJ
I and CC
I moderate-income JJ
I homeowners NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I second JJ
I provision NN
O <comma> <comma>
O affecting VBG
I so-called JJ
I 235 CD
I mortgages NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O has VBZ
O met VBN
I strong JJ
I opposition NN
O from IN
I investment NN
I bankers NNS
O represented VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I Public NNP
I Securities NNP
I Association NNP
O <period> <period>
O And CC
I a DT
I squad NN
O of IN
I influential JJ
I former JJ
I Senate NNP
I aides NNS
O employed VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I Wall NNP
I Street NNP
I firm NN
I Salomon NNP
I Brothers NNPS
O came VBD
O to TO
I the DT
I Capitol NNP
O in IN
I a DT
I vain JJ
I attempt NN
O to TO
O strip VB
I the DT
I provision NN
O <period> <period>
O By IN
I an DT
I 11-2 JJ
I margin NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Senate NNP
I negotiators NNS
O voted VBD
O to TO
O preserve VB
I the DT
I 235 CD
I mortgage NN
I refinancing NN
I plan NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O despite IN
I powerful JJ
I allies NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I opposition NN
O found VBD
I itself PRP
O undercut VBP
O by IN
I an DT
I unusual JJ
I alliance NN
O of IN
I liberals NNS
I and CC
I conservatives NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I government NN
O currently RB
O is VBZ
O subsidizing VBG
I an DT
I estimated VBN
I 23<comma>000 CD
I loans NNS
O above IN
I 11 CD
I <percent> NN
O under IN
I the DT
I 235 CD
I program NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O however RB
O disruptive JJ
O to TO
I private JJ
I investors NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I refinancing NN
O is VBZ
O expected VBN
O to TO
O yield VB
I at IN
I least JJS
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 15 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I savings NNS
O in IN
I fiscal JJ
I 1990 CD
O <period> <period>
I This DT
I sum NN
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O guarded VBN
O jealously RB
O by IN
I appropriators NNS
O anxious JJ
O to TO
O offset VB
I spending NN
O elsewhere RB
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I conservative JJ
I Sen<period> NNP
I Phil NNP
I Gramm NNP
O cast NN
I the DT
I fight NN
O as IN
I a DT
I populist JJ
I stand NN
O against IN
I monied JJ
I interests NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O are VBP
I stewards NNS
O here RB
O <comma> <comma>
O not RB
O of IN
I the DT
I mortgage NN
I companies NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I the DT
I taxpayers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I the DT
I Texas NNP
I Republican NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I action NN
O came VBD
O as IN
I the DT
I administration NN
O won VBD
I final JJ
I congressional JJ
I approval NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 9 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I assistance NN
O for IN
I elections NNS
O scheduled VBN
O in IN
I Nicaragua NNP
O in IN
I February NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I bulk NN
O of IN
I the DT
I money NN
O would MD
O be VB
O funneled VBN
O through IN
I the DT
I National NNP
I Endowment NNP
O for IN
I Democracy NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I the DT
I legislation NN
O is VBZ
O so RB
O vaguely RB
O written VBN
O that IN
I it PRP
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O dogged VBN
O by IN
I questions NNS
O regarding VBG
I the DT
I money NN
B <apost>s POS
I true JJ
I purpose NN
O and CC
I its PRP<dollar>
I ultimate JJ
I destination NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Senate NNP
O had VBD
O refused VBN
I late JJ
I Friday NNP
O to TO
O invoke VB
I cloture NN
O and CC
O limit NN
I debate NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O behind IN
I the DT
I bipartisan JJ
I leadership NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I solid JJ
I majority NN
O took VBD
I shape NN
B yesterday NN
O and CC
O brushed VBD
O aside RB
I amendments NNS
O seeking VBG
O to TO
O cut VB
I the DT
I total JJ
I package NN
O or CC
O steer VB
I it PRP
O away RB
O from IN
I direct JJ
I aid NN
O to TO
I political JJ
I parties NNS
O <period> <period>
I Final JJ
I approval NN
O -- =colon=
O on IN
I a DT
I 64-35 JJ
I roll NN
I call NN
O -- =colon=
O was VBD
O never RB
O in IN
I doubt NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I the DT
I opposition NN
O drew VBD
I an DT
I unusual JJ
I mix NN
O of IN
I senators NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O including VBG
I Republicans NNP
I Jesse NNP
I Helms NNP
I and CC
I Warren NNP
I Rudman NNP
O and CC
I Democrats NNP
I Bill NNP
I Bradley NNP
I and CC
I John NNP
I Glenn NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I money NN
O will MD
O be VB
O applied VBN
O for IN
I voter NN
I registration NN
O and CC
I election NN
I monitoring NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I more JJR
I than IN
I half NN
O is VBZ
O likely JJ
O to TO
O go VB
O to TO
I the DT
I Union NNP
I Nacional NNP
I Opositora NNP
I party NN
O <period> <period>
I Critics NNS
O warned VBD
I such JJ
I cash NN
I contributions NNS
O may MD
O only RB
O undercut VB
I the DT
I opposition NN
I party NN
B <apost>s POS
I standing VBG
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I one CD
I irony NN
O is VBZ
O that IN
O under IN
I Nicaraguan JJ
I law NN
B a DT
I major JJ
I portion NN
O of IN
I the DT
I opposition NN
I party NN
B <apost>s POS
I funds NNS
O must MD
O be VB
O shared VBN
O with IN
I the DT
I government NN
B <apost>s POS
I Supreme NNP
I Electoral NNP
I Council NNP
O <period> <period>
O Within IN
I the DT
I appropriations NNS
I conference NN
B yesterday NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 67 CD
I billion CD
I measure NN
O is VBZ
I the DT
I second JJ
I largest JJS
O of IN
I the DT
I annual JJ
I domestic JJ
I spending NN
I bills NNS
O and CC
O covers VBZ
I a DT
I disparate JJ
I collection NN
O of IN
I accounts NNS
O for IN
I science NN
O <comma> <comma>
I housing NN
O <comma> <comma>
I veterans NNS
O and CC
I the DT
I environment NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I decision NN
O to TO
O raise VB
I the DT
I ceiling NN
O on IN
I FHA NNP
I home NN
I loans NNS
O still RB
O faces VBZ
I strong JJ
I opposition NN
O in IN
I the DT
I House NNP
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O driven VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I same JJ
I fiscal JJ
I pressures NNS
B that WDT
O have VBP
O forced VBN
I lawmakers NNS
O to TO
O resort VB
O to TO
I various JJ
I bookkeeping NN
I devices NNS
O to TO
O juggle VB
I as RB
I much JJ
I as IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1 CD
I billion CD
O in IN
I spending NN
B that WDT
O would MD
O otherwise RB
O put VB
I the DT
I bill NN
O over IN
I budget NN
O <period> <period>
I These DT
I costs NNS
O will MD
O complicate VB
I the DT
I budget NN
I picture NN
O in IN
I fiscal JJ
I 1991 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I the DT
I measure NN
O further JJ
O commits VBZ
I Congress NNP
O to TO
I a DT
I set NN
O of IN
I costly JJ
I projects NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O including VBG
I the DT
I first JJ
I construction NN
I funds NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I space NN
I station NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I station NN
O is VBZ
O promised VBN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>8 CD
I billion CD
O within IN
I the DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 5<period>36 CD
I billion CD
O provided VBN
O for IN
I research NN
I and CC
I development NN
O in IN
I the DT
I National NNP
I Aeronautics NNP
I and CC
I Space NNP
I Administration NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I the DT
I nation NN
B <apost>s POS
I high-speed JJ
I aerospace NN
I plane NN
O -- =colon=
O cut VB
O by IN
I the DT
I Senate NNP
O -- =colon=
O could MD
O receive VB
I as RB
I much JJ
I as IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 60 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I new JJ
I funds NNS
O or CC
I transfers NNS
O <period> <period>
O Similarly RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I House NNP
O agreed VBD
O to TO
O add VB
O back RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 62 CD
I million CD
O to TO
O continue VB
I work NN
O on IN
I the DT
I advanced VBN
I communications NNS
I technology NN
I satellite NN
O <comma> <comma>
O being VBG
O developed VBN
O by IN
I General NNP
I Electric NNP
I Co NNP
O <period> <period>
O And CC
O while IN
O setting VBG
I a DT
I statutory JJ
I limit NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>6 CD
I billion CD
O on IN
I the DT
I automated VBN
I space NN
I probe NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I conference NN
O appropriated VBN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 30 CD
I million CD
O for IN
I the DT
I start-up NN
O of IN
I the DT
I CRAF-Cassini NNP
I mission NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I successor NN
O to TO
I the DT
I Voyager NNP
I space NN
I probe NN
O <period> <period>
O Among IN
I major JJ
I domestic JJ
I agencies NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Environmental NNP
I Protection NNP
I Agency NNP
O stands VBZ
O to TO
O receive VB
I increases NNS
O significantly RB
O beyond IN
I those DT
O sought VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I administration NN
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I pollution NN
I abatement NN
I and CC
I control NN
I accounts NNS
O growing VBG
O by IN
I 14 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 829<period>9 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I An DT
I estimated VBN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>57 CD
I billion CD
O is VBZ
O separately RB
O allocated VBN
O for IN
I the DT
I National NNP
I Science NNP
I Foundation NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O within IN
I the DT
I Housing NNP
I and CC
I Urban NNP
I Development NNP
I Department NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I more JJR
I than IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 9<period>2 CD
I billion CD
O is VBZ
O provided VBN
O for IN
I federally RB
I assisted VBN
I housing NN
O <comma> <comma>
O including VBG
I an DT
I expanded VBN
I effort NN
O to TO
O modernize VB
I public JJ
I housing NN
I units NNS
B that WDT
O serve VBP
I the DT
I poorest JJS
I families NNS
O <period> <period>
O To TO
I an DT
I unusual JJ
I degree NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I massive JJ
I bill NN
O has VBZ
O become VBN
I a DT
I vehicle NN
O for IN
I lawmakers NNS
O to TO
O earmark VB
I funds NNS
O for IN
I projects NNS
O in IN
I home NN
I states NNS
O <period> <period>
O While IN
I the DT
I practice NN
O was VBD
O discouraged VBN
O in IN
I the DT
I past NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I conference NN
I agreement NN
O is VBZ
O laced VBN
O with IN
I veterans NNS
B <apost> POS
I hospitals NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I environmental JJ
I projects NNS
O and CC
I urban JJ
I grants NNS
O designated VBN
O for IN
I specific JJ
I communities NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I most RBS
I striking JJ
I example NN
B yesterday NN
O may MD
O have VB
O been VBN
O in IN
I community NN
I development NN
I funds NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O where WRB
I the DT
I two CD
I houses NNS
O had VBD
O separately RB
O approved VBN
I a DT
I total NN
O of IN
I 27 CD
I projects NNS
O valued VBN
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 20 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I the DT
I conference NN
O added VBD
I 15 CD
I more RBR
O valued VBN
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 8 CD
I million CD
O to TO
O ostensibly RB
O preserve VB
O <quote> <quote>
I balance NN
O <quote> <quote>
O between IN
I the DT
I House NNP
I and CC
I Senate NNP
O <period> <period>
I Yesterday NN
B <apost>s POS
I conference NN
I agreement NN
O is VBZ
I the DT
I second JJ
I major JJ
I bill NN
O to TO
O emerge VB
O from IN
I negotiations NNS
B this DT
I week NN
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
I appropriators NNS
O approved VBD
I a DT
I fiscal JJ
I 1990 CD
I transportation NN
I bill NN
B late JJ
I Monday NNP
B that WDT
O includes VBZ
I a DT
I sweeping VBG
I ban NN
O on IN
O smoking NN
O on IN
I most RBS
I domestic JJ
I airline NN
I flights NNS
O <period> <period>
I An DT
I exemption NN
O will MD
O remain VB
O for IN
I flights NNS
O longer RB
O than IN
I six CD
I hours NNS
O to TO
I Hawaii NNP
I and CC
I Alaska NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I estimates NNS
O by IN
I the DT
I tobacco NN
I industry NN
B yesterday NN
O indicate VB
I all DT
I but CC
I about IN
I 30 CD
I flights NNS
O would MD
O be VB
O covered VBN
O <period> <period>
O Separately RB
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I third JJ
I conference NN
I report NN
O covering VBG
I an DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 18<period>4 CD
I billion CD
I Treasury NNP
I and CC
I Postal NNP
I Service NNP
I bill NN
O was VBD
O sent VBN
O to TO
I the DT
I Senate NNP
O after IN
O passing VBG
I the DT
I House NNP
O on IN
I a DT
I 383-30 JJ
I roll NN
I call NN
B yesterday NN
O <period> <period>
O And CC
O after IN
I weeks NNS
O of IN
I delay NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I appropriations NNS
I process VBP
O is VBZ
O beginning VBG
O to TO
O take VB
I some DT
I final JJ
I shape NN
O <period> <period>
I Defense NNP
O and CC
I foreign JJ
I aid NN
O are VBP
I the DT
I two CD
I most RBS
I critical JJ
I areas NNS
O remaining VBG
O from IN
I the DT
I administration NN
B <apost>s POS
I standpoint NN
O <period> <period>
O And CC
O among IN
I domestic JJ
I programs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I most RBS
I serious JJ
I threat NN
O is VBZ
I White NNP
I House NNP
I opposition NN
O to TO
I abortion NN
I riders NNS
O attached VBN
O to TO
I separate VB
I bills NNS
O funding VBG
I the DT
I District NNP
O of IN
I Columbia NNP
O and CC
I Department NNP
O of IN
I Health NNP
O and CC
I Human NNP
I Services NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I same JJ
I issue NN
O threatens VBZ
O to TO
O spill VB
O over IN
O to TO
I the DT
I foreign JJ
I aid NN
I debate NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Mr<period> NNP
I Bush NNP
O also RB
O is VBZ
O threatening VBG
O to TO
O veto VB
I any DT
I agreement NN
B that WDT
O preserves VBZ
I Senate-passed JJ
I provisions NNS
O renewing VBG
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I support NN
O for IN
I the DT
I United NNP
I Nations NNP
I Fund NNP
O for IN
I Population NNP
I Activities NNP
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I a DT
I sharply RB
I written VBN
I letter NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Rep<period> NNP
I David NNP
I Obey NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I chairman NN
O of IN
I the DT
I House NNP
I appropriations NNS
I subcommittee NN
O for IN
I foreign JJ
I operations NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O warned VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Bush NNP
O that IN
I the DT
I result NN
O of IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I <quote> <quote>
I ultimatum NN
I <quote> <quote>
O could MD
O weaken VB
I efforts NNS
O to TO
O accommodate VB
I the DT
I administration NN
O elsewhere RB
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O As IN
I a DT
I result NN
O of IN
I your PRP<dollar>
I ultimatum NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O writes VBZ
I the DT
I Wisconsin NNP
I Democrat NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O guess VBP
I there EX
O is VBZ
O no RB
O longer RB
I any DT
I point NN
O in IN
O taking VBG
I administration NN
I views NNS
O into IN
I account NN
O on IN
I other JJ
I items NNS
O in IN
I conference NN
O <comma> <comma>
O inasmuch RB
O regardless RB
O of IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I resolution NN
B you PRP
O apparently RB
O intend VBP
O to TO
O veto VB
I this DT
I bill NN
O <period> <period>
I Markets NNS
O usually RB
O get VB
O noticed VBD
O because IN
I they PRP
O soar VBP
O or CC
O plunge NN
O <period> <period>
I Gold NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O has VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O risen VBN
O or CC
O fallen VBN
O significantly RB
O in IN
I quite RB
I some DT
I time NN
O <comma> <comma>
I yesterday NN
O achieved VBN
I what WP
O may MD
O be VB
I a DT
I new JJ
I level NN
O of IN
I impassiveness NN
O =colon= =colon=
I The DT
I most RBS
I actively RB
I traded VBN
I futures NNS
I contracts NNS
O closed VBD
O unchanged JJ
O despite IN
I nervous JJ
I fluctuations NNS
O in IN
O both DT
I the DT
I dollar NN
O and CC
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I settlement NN
I prices NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I December NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I February NNP
I and CC
I April NNP
I gold NN
I contracts NNS
O were VBD
O even RB
O with IN
I Monday NNP
B <apost>s POS
I final JJ
I prices NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I December NNP
I 1989 CD
I contract NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O has VBZ
I the DT
I greatest JJS
I trading NN
I volume NN
O <comma> <comma>
O ended VBD
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 371<period>20 CD
B an DT
I ounce NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I other JJ
I months NNS
O posted VBD
I advances NNS
O of IN
O 10 CD
O cents NNS
O to TO
O 20 CD
O cents NNS
I an DT
I ounce NN
O <period> <period>
O According VBG
O to TO
I one CD
I analyst NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Bernard NNP
I Savaiko NNP
O of IN
I PaineWebber NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I New NNP
I York NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
B <apost>s POS
I ability NN
O on IN
I Monday NNP
O to TO
O rally VB
O from IN
I last JJ
I Friday NNP
B <apost>s POS
I decline NN
O -- =colon=
I which WDT
O seemed VBD
O to TO
O indicate VB
O that IN
I the DT
I economy NN
O was VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O going VBG
O to TO
O fall VB
O either DT
O -- =colon=
O took VBD
I the DT
I starch NN
O out IN
O of IN
I precious JJ
I metals NNS
I prices NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O out IN
O of IN
I gold NN
I <apost>s POS
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I particular NN
O <period> <period>
I Yesterday NN
O <comma> <comma>
I gold NN
O traded VBN
O within IN
I a DT
I narrow JJ
I range NN
O <period> <period>
I Gold NNP
O tried VBD
O to TO
O rally VB
O on IN
I Monday NNP
O but CC
O ran VBD
O into IN
I the DT
I same JJ
I situation NN
B that WDT
O has VBZ
O subdued VBN
I gold NN
I prices NNS
O for IN
I more JJR
I than IN
I a DT
I year NN
O =colon= =colon=
O selling VBG
O by IN
I gold NN
I producers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O want VBP
O to TO
O fix VB
I the DT
I highest JJS
I possible JJ
I price NN
O for IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I gold NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I December NNP
I delivery NN
I gold NN
O is VBZ
O trading VBG
O in IN
I a DT
I range NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 365 CD
I to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 375 CD
O <lparen> <lparen>
I an DT
I ounce NN
O <rparen> <rparen>
O and CC
O is VBZ
O having VBG
I difficulty NN
O breaking VBG
O out IN
O above IN
I that DT
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Savaiko NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Producers NNS
O at IN
I the DT
I moment NN
O regard NN
I that DT
I area NN
B a DT
I good JJ
I one CD
O in IN
I which WDT
O to TO
O sell VB
I gold NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Also RB
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Savaiko NNP
O noted VBD
O <comma> <comma>
I stock NN
I market NN
I investors NNS
O seeking VBG
I greater JJR
I safety NN
O are VBP
O veering VBG
O toward IN
O buying VBG
I bonds NNS
O rather RB
O than IN
I precious JJ
I metals NNS
O because IN
O <quote> <quote>
I we PRP
O are VBP
O tending VBG
O more JJR
O toward IN
I a DT
I disinflationary JJ
I economy NN
B that WDT
O does VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O make VB
I gold NN
O and CC
I precious JJ
I metals NNS
O attractive JJ
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Jeffrey NNP
I Nichols NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I president NN
O of IN
I APMS NNP
I Canada NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Toronto NNP
I precious JJ
I metals NNS
I advisers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I there EX
O is VBZ
I little JJ
O to TO
O motivate VB
I gold NN
I traders NNS
O to TO
O buy VB
I the DT
I metal NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Investors NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O and CC
I Europe NNP
O are VBP
O comfortable JJ
O with IN
I the DT
I actions NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I <lparen> <lparen>
I Federal NNP
I Reserve NNP
I <rparen> <rparen>
O in IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I willingness NN
O to TO
O supply VB
I liquidity NN
O to TO
I financial JJ
I system NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O helped VBD
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O rebound NN
O on IN
I Monday NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I There EX
O is VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
I any DT
I rush NN
O on IN
I the DT
I part NN
O of IN
I investors NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I West NNP
O to TO
O buy VB
I gold NN
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I They PRP
O still RB
O bear VBP
I the DT
I memory NN
O of IN
I October NNP
I 1987 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O when WRB
I they PRP
O bought VBD
I gold NN
O after IN
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O crashed VBD
O and CC
O ended VBD
O up IN
O losing VBG
I money NN
O because IN
I gold NN
I prices NNS
O subsequently RB
O fell VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Nichols NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I It PRP
O <apost>s VBZ
I an DT
I experience NN
B they PRP
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O want VB
O to TO
O repeat VB
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O At IN
I the DT
I moment NN
B gold NN
I traders NNS
O are VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O concerned VBN
O about IN
I inflation NN
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O said VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O as IN
O for IN
I the DT
I dollar NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I gold NN
B <apost>s POS
I association NN
O with IN
I the DT
I currency NN
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O diminishing VBG
O recently RB
O so RB
I drops VBZ
O in IN
I the DT
I currency NN
O are VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O having VBG
I much JJ
I impact NN
O on IN
I gold NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Dinsa NNP
I Mehta NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I chief JJ
I bullion NN
I trader NN
O for IN
I Chase NNP
I Manhattan NNP
I Bank NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
O =colon= =colon=
O <quote> <quote>
I There EX
O is VBZ
I little JJ
I incentive NN
O on IN
I the DT
I part NN
O of IN
I traders NNS
O to TO
O sell VB
I gold NN
O because IN
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O may MD
O go VB
O lower JJR
O and CC
I gold NN
O may MD
O retain VB
I some DT
O of IN
O its PRP<dollar>
O <quote> <quote>
O flight NN
O to TO
I safety VB
O <apost> POS
O quality NN
O <period> <period>
I There EX
O is VBZ
I little JJ
I incentive NN
O to TO
O buy VB
I gold NN
O because IN
O if IN
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O goes VBZ
O higher JJR
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O may MD
O be VB
I just RB
I a DT
I false JJ
I alarm NN
O <period> <period>
I This DT
O is VBZ
O keeping VBG
I the DT
I gold NN
I traders NNS
O handcuffed VBN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I most RBS
I remarkable JJ
I feature NN
O about IN
I yesterday NN
B <apost>s POS
I action NN
O was VBD
O that IN
I the DT
I price NN
O of IN
I roughly RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 370 CD
B an DT
I ounce NN
O was VBD
O regarded VBN
O as IN
O attractive JJ
O enough RB
O by IN
I gold NN
I producers NNS
O around IN
I the DT
I world NN
O to TO
O aggressively RB
O sell VB
I gold NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Mehta NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O know VB
I what WP
B it PRP
O means VBZ
O over IN
I the DT
I long JJ
I run NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O for IN
I the DT
I short JJ
I term NN
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O appears VBZ
O that IN
I gold NN
I producers NNS
O are VBP
O grateful JJ
O for IN
I the DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 10 CD
I or CC
I so RB
B that DT
B gold NN
O has VBZ
O risen VBN
O over IN
I the DT
I past JJ
I week NN
I or CC
I so RB
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O Previously RB
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O noted VBD
O <comma> <comma>
I gold NN
I producers NNS
O tended VBD
O to TO
O back RB
O off IN
O from IN
I a DT
I rising VBG
I gold NN
I market NN
O <comma> <comma>
O letting VBG
I prices NNS
O rise VBP
I as RB
I much JJ
O as IN
O possible JJ
O before IN
O selling VBG
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Mehta NNP
O observed VBD
O that IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I merchandise NN
I trade NN
I deficit NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O rose VBD
O sharply RB
O in IN
I August NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I yesterday NN
B <apost>s POS
I report NN
O <comma> <comma>
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O having VBG
I less JJR
I and CC
I less JJR
I impact NN
O on IN
I the DT
I gold NN
I market NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I dollar NN
O has VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O reacted VBN
O much JJ
O to TO
I it PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O so RB
I gold NN
O has VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O either DT
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I other JJ
I commodity NN
I markets NNS
B yesterday NN
O =colon= =colon=
I ENERGY NN
I =colon= =colon=
I Crude JJ
I oil NN
I prices NNS
O rose VBD
O slightly RB
O in IN
I lackluster JJ
I activity NN
O as IN
I traders NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I pits NNS
O tried VBD
O to TO
O assess VB
I action NN
O in IN
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O <period> <period>
O Since IN
I stock NN
I market NN
I indexes NNS
O plummeted VBD
I last JJ
I Friday NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I participants NNS
O in IN
I all DT
I markets NNS
O have VBP
O been VBN
O wary JJ
O <period> <period>
O When WRB
I traders NNS
O become VBP
O confident JJ
O that IN
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O has VBZ
O stabilized VBN
O <comma> <comma>
I oil NN
I prices NNS
O are VBP
O expected VBN
O to TO
O rise VB
O as IN
I supply NN
I and CC
I demand NN
I fundamentals NNS
O once RB
O again RB
O become VB
I the DT
I major JJ
I consideration NN
O <period> <period>
I Crude JJ
I oil NN
O for IN
I November NNP
I delivery NN
O edged VBD
O up IN
O by IN
I 16 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I barrel NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 20<period>75 CD
B a DT
I barrel NN
O <period> <period>
I Heating NN
I oil NN
I prices NNS
O also RB
O rose VBD
O <period> <period>
I November NNP
I gasoline NN
O slipped VBD
O slightly RB
O <period> <period>
I SUGAR NN
I =colon= =colon=
I Futures NNS
I prices NNS
O rose VBD
O on IN
I a DT
I report NN
O that IN
I Cuba NNP
O may MD
O seek VB
O to TO
O postpone VB
I some DT
I sugar NN
I shipments NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I March NNP
I contract NN
O advanced VBD
I 0<period>14 CD
I cent NN
B a DT
I pound NN
O to TO
I 14<period>11 CD
I cents NNS
O <period> <period>
O According VBG
O to TO
I an DT
I analyst NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Cuba NNP
O ca MD
O n<apost>t RB
O meet VB
I all DT
I its PRP<dollar>
I shipment NN
I commitments NNS
O and CC
O has VBZ
O asked VBN
I Japan NNP
O to TO
O accept VB
I a DT
I delay NN
O of IN
I shipments NNS
O scheduled VBN
O for IN
I later RB
I this DT
I year NN
O <comma> <comma>
O into IN
I early JJ
I next JJ
I year NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Japan NNP
O is VBZ
O perceived VBN
O as IN
I a DT
I wealthy JJ
I nation NN
B that WDT
O can MD
O turn VB
O elsewhere RB
O in IN
I the DT
I world NN
I market NN
O and CC
O buy VB
I the DT
I sugar NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I the DT
I analyst NN
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O was VBD
I the DT
I possibility NN
O of IN
I this DT
I demand NN
B that WDT
O helped VBD
O firm NN
I prices NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I analyst NN
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Another DT
I analyst NN
O noted VBD
O that IN
I Cuba NNP
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O deferring VBG
I shipments NNS
O in IN
I recent JJ
I years NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O To TO
I the DT
I professionals NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I trade NN
B it PRP
O did VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O cause VB
I much JJ
I surprise NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I March NNP
I futures NNS
I contract VBP
O traded VBN
O as RB
O high JJ
O as IN
I 14<period>24 CD
I cents NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O could MD
O n<apost>t RB
O sustain VB
I the DT
I advance NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I LIVESTOCK NNP
I AND CC
I MEATS NNPS
I =colon= =colon=
I The DT
I prices NNS
O of IN
I cattle NNS
I <comma> <comma>
I hogs NNS
I and CC
I pork NN
I belly NN
I futures NNS
I contracts NNS
O rebounded VBD
O as IN
I livestock NN
I traders NNS
O shook VBD
O off IN
I fears NNS
O that IN
I the DT
I Friday NNP
I stock NN
I market NN
I plunge NN
O would MD
O chill VB
I consumer NN
I spending NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O in IN
I turn NN
O would MD
O hurt VB
I retail JJ
I sales NNS
O of IN
I beef NN
I and CC
I pork NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I prices NNS
O of IN
I most RBS
I livestock NN
I futures NNS
I contracts NNS
O had VBD
O dropped VBN
O sharply RB
I Monday NNP
O <period> <period>
I Cattle NNS
I futures NNS
I prices NNS
O were VBD
O also RB
O supported VBN
I yesterday NN
O by IN
I signs VBZ
O that IN
I supermarket NN
I chains NNS
O are VBP
O making VBG
I plans NNS
O to TO
O increase VB
I their PRP<dollar>
I promotions NNS
O concerning VBG
I beef NN
O <period> <period>
I GRAINS NNS
I AND CC
I SOYBEANS NNS
I =colon= =colon=
I The DT
I prices NNS
O of IN
I most RBS
I soybean NN
I and CC
I soybean-meal NN
I futures NNS
I contracts NNS
O rose VBD
O amid IN
I rumors NNS
O that IN
I the DT
I Soviet NNP
I Union NNP
O is VBZ
O interested JJ
O in IN
O buying VBG
O from IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O or CC
I South NNP
I America NNP
B about IN
I 250<comma>000 CD
I metric JJ
I tons NNS
O of IN
I soybeans NNS
O and CC
I as RB
I many JJ
I as IN
I 400<comma>000 CD
I metric JJ
I tons NNS
O of IN
I soybean NN
I meal NN
O <period> <period>
I Traders NNS
O are VBP
O especially RB
O sensitive JJ
O to TO
I reports NNS
O of IN
I possible JJ
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I soybean NN
I sales NNS
O because IN
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I exports NNS
O are VBP
O lagging VBG
O <period> <period>
O Since IN
I Sept<period> NNP
I 1 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I about IN
I 13 CD
I million CD
I fewer JJR
I bushels NNS
O of IN
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I soybeans NNS
O have VBP
O been VBN
O sold VBN
O overseas JJ
O than IN
O for IN
I the DT
I same JJ
I period NN
B last JJ
I year NN
O <period> <period>
I Corn NN
I futures NNS
I prices NNS
O rose VBD
O slightly RB
O while IN
I wheat NN
I prices NNS
O settled VBD
O mixed VBN
O <period> <period>
I Moody NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Investors NNP
I Service NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O fretting VBG
O about IN
I increasing VBG
I competitive JJ
I pressure NN
O on IN
I Ryder NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O placed VBD
I about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>8 CD
I billion CD
O in IN
I company NN
I securities NNS
O under IN
I review NN
O for IN
I possible JJ
I downgrade NN
O <period> <period>
I Ratings NNS
O under IN
I review NN
O are VBP
I Ryder NNP
B <apost>s POS
I A-1 JJ
I collateral NN
I trust NN
I debentures NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I A-2 NN
I senior JJ
I notes NNS
I and CC
I bonds NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I A-2 NN
I preferred JJ
I stock NN
O and CC
I the DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I Prime-1 JJ
I rating NN
O for IN
I commercial JJ
I paper NN
O <period> <period>
I Moody NNP
B <apost>s POS
O said VBD
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O assessing VBG
I the DT
I strategies NNS
B Ryder NNP
B <apost>s POS
I management NN
O may MD
O follow VB
O in IN
O addressing VBG
I significant JJ
I challenges NNS
O in IN
I some DT
I major JJ
I markets NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I rating NN
I agency NN
O said VBD
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O focusing VBG
O especially RB
O on IN
I the DT
I transportation NN
I service NN
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I efforts NNS
O to TO
O control VB
I costs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O improve VB
I margins NNS
O and CC
O enhance VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I competitive JJ
I position NN
O in IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I primary JJ
I business NN
O <comma> <comma>
I vehicle NN
I leasing NN
I and CC
I rental JJ
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I nations NNS
O of IN
I southern JJ
I Africa NNP
O know VB
I a DT
I lot NN
O about IN
O managing VBG
I elephants NNS
O <colon> =colon=
I their PRP<dollar>
I herds NNS
O are VBP
O thriving VBG
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I the DT
I nations NNS
O of IN
I Europe NNP
O and CC
I North NNP
I America NNP
O have VBP
O decided VBN
I they PRP
O know VBP
O better JJR
O <period> <period>
O At IN
I this DT
I week NN
B <apost>s POS
I U<period>N<period> NNP
I conference NN
O in IN
I Lausanne NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I they PRP
O imposed VBD
I a DT
I global JJ
I ivory NN
I ban NN
B that WDT
O seeks VBZ
O to TO
O overturn VB
I local JJ
I policies NNS
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I Zimbabwean NNP
I delegate NN
O argued VBD
O that IN
I the DT
I ban NN
O would MD
O <quote> <quote>
O guarantee VB
I the DT
I extinction NN
O of IN
I the DT
I elephant NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Legitimate JJ
I ranchers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O have VBP
I an DT
I interest NN
O in IN
O preserving VBG
I the DT
I herds NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O would MD
O go VB
O out IN
O of IN
I business NN
O <period> <period>
I Poachers NNS
O would MD
O control VB
I the DT
I underground JJ
I trade NN
O <period> <period>
I Many JJ
I delegates NNS
O were VBD
O willing JJ
O to TO
O craft VB
I a DT
I compromise NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I delegate NN
I Constance NNP
I Harriman NNP
O and CC
I others NNS
O thundered VBD
I that DT
O down RB
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Greens NNPS
O from IN
I the DT
I First NNP
I World NNP
O wanted VBD
I a DT
I morality NN
I play NN
O <comma> <comma>
O not RB
I a DT
I negotiation NN
O <period> <period>
O Fortunately RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I nations NNS
O of IN
I southern JJ
I Africa NNP
O have VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O totally RB
O surrendered VBD
I their PRP<dollar>
I sovereignty NN
O <period> <period>
I Five CD
I countries NNS
O announced VBD
I they PRP
O would MD
O not RB
O honor VB
I what WP
B one CD
I Zimbabwean NNP
I delegate NN
O wryly RB
O called VBD
O the DT
O <quote> <quote>
O made VBN
O in IN
I Switzerland NNP
O <quote> <quote>
O solution NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I fact NN
O <comma> <comma>
I they PRP
O seemed VBD
I a DT
I mite NN
O resentful JJ
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I director NN
O of IN
I Zimbabwe NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Wildlife NNP
I Department NNP
O described VBD
I American JJ
I conservationists NNS
O as IN
O <quote> <quote>
I fat JJ
I little JJ
I puppies NNS
O from IN
I urban JJ
I environments NNS
B who WP
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O know VB
I a DT
I thing NN
O about IN
I Africa NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I That DT
O <apost>s VBZ
O not RB
O fair JJ
O <colon> =colon=
I they PRP
O <apost>re VBP
O not RB
O all DT
O fat NN
O <period> <period>
I HUGO<apost>S NNP
I BLAST NN
O generates VBZ
I pleas NNS
O for IN
I aid NN
O from IN
I South NNP
I Carolina NNP
I small JJ
I businesses NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Small NNP
I Business NNP
I Administration NNP
O has VBZ
O received VBN
I more JJR
I than IN
I 5<comma>000 CD
I formal JJ
I requests NNS
O for IN
I disaster NN
I loans NNS
O because IN
O of IN
I the DT
I hurricane NN
O <period> <period>
I About IN
I 45 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I requests NNS
O for IN
I SBA NNP
I relief NN
I loans NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O also RB
O are VBP
O available JJ
O to TO
I homeowners NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O come VB
O from IN
I small JJ
I businesses NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O compared VBN
O with IN
I a DT
I 25 CD
I <percent> NN
I business NN
I share NN
O after IN
I most RBS
I disasters NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I SBA NNP
O expects VBZ
O to TO
O make VB
I about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1 CD
I billion CD
O in IN
I Hurricane NNP
I Hugo NNP
I loans NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I disaster NN
I fund NN
O is VBZ
O replenished VBN
O by IN
I loan NN
I repayments NNS
O <period> <period>
O Hardest RBS
O hit VBN
O by IN
I Hugo NNP
O in IN
I South NNP
I Carolina NNP
O were VBD
I small JJ
I retailers NNS
O tied VBN
O to TO
I the DT
I tourist NN
I industry NN
O and CC
I businesses NNS
O in IN
I agriculture NN
O and CC
I cultivated VBN
I seafood NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I State NNP
I Development NNP
I Board NNP
O set VBD
O up IN
I a DT
I Hugo NNP
I Hotline NNP
O to TO
O accept VB
I business-to-business JJ
I help NN
O <period> <period>
O After IN
I NBC NNP
I weather NN
I man NN
I Willard NNP
I Scott NNP
O broadcast NN
I the DT
I hot-line NN
I number NN
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O was VBD
O flooded VBN
O with IN
I 10<comma>000 CD
I calls VBZ
O <period> <period>
I Last JJ
I week NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I Chamber NNP
O of IN
I Commerce NNP
O began VBD
O using VBG
I its PRP<dollar>
I national JJ
I TV NN
I show NN
O to TO
O seek VB
I help NN
O <comma> <comma>
O such JJ
O as IN
I equipment NN
O <comma> <comma>
O for IN
I business NN
I owners NNS
O <period> <period>
I Local JJ
I bankers NNS
I and CC
I accountants NNS
O help VBP
I applicants NNS
O fill VBP
O out IN
I forms NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I It PRP
O helps VBZ
I us PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I people NNS
O feel VBP
O better JJR
O talking VBG
O to TO
I someone NN
B who WP
O <apost>s VBZ
O gone VBN
O through IN
I the DT
I same JJ
I thing NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I an DT
I SBA NNP
I official NN
O says NNS
O <period> <period>
I HEALTH NN
I BENEFITS NNS
O remain VBP
I a DT
I central JJ
I lobbying NN
I effort NN
O <comma> <comma>
O even RB
O as IN
I Section NN
I 89 CD
O fades NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Senate NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O after IN
O deleting VBG
I Section NN
I 89 CD
I repeal NN
O from IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I deficit-reduction NN
I bill NN
O <comma> <comma>
O still RB
O is VBZ
O expected VBN
O to TO
O join VB
I the DT
I House NNP
O in IN
O voting NN
O to TO
O kill VB
I the DT
I law NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O forces VBZ
I companies NNS
O to TO
O provide VB
I comparable JJ
I benefits NNS
O to TO
I laborers NNS
I and CC
I executives NNS
O alike RB
O <period> <period>
O In IN
O lobbying VBG
O on IN
I other JJ
I health-coverage NN
I topics NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I National NNP
I Federation NNP
O of IN
I Independent NNP
I Business NNP
O will MD
O press VB
O for IN
I legislation NN
B that WDT
O would MD
O give VB
I self-employed JJ
I people NNS
B a DT
I 100 CD
I <percent> NN
I tax NN
I deduction NN
O for IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I own JJ
I health NN
I plans NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O up IN
O from IN
I 25 CD
I <percent> NN
O currently RB
O <period> <period>
O And CC
I the DT
I group NN
O will MD
O urge VB
O that IN
I the DT
I federal JJ
I government NN
O pre-empt VB
I state NN
I rules NNS
O on IN
I what WP
O must MD
O be VB
O covered VBN
O by IN
I employers NNS
B <apost> POS
I health NN
I insurance NN
O <period> <period>
I Small-business NN
I groups NNS
O also RB
O will MD
O fight VB
I the DT
I medical-leave JJ
I provision NN
O of IN
I legislation NN
B that WDT
O would MD
O expand VB
I parental JJ
I leaves NNS
O <period> <period>
O And CC
I they PRP
O still RB
O oppose VBP
O as IN
O too RB
O costly JJ
I an DT
I employer-paid JJ
I health NN
I insurance NN
I bill NN
O sponsored VBN
O by IN
I Sen<period> NNP
I Edward NNP
I Kennedy NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I D<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Mass NNP
I <period> <period>
O <rparen> <rparen>
O despite IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I proposal NN
O to TO
O phase VB
O in IN
I small JJ
I business NN
O only RB
O gradually RB
O <period> <period>
I There EX
O is VBZ
O also RB
I worry VB
O that IN
I the DT
I Pepper NNP
I Commission NNP
O studying VBG
I long-term JJ
I health NN
I care NN
O will MD
O again RB
O push VB
I lawmakers NNS
O toward IN
I employerpaid JJ
I solutions NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Section NN
I 89 CD
I victory NN
O could MD
O have VB
I a DT
I downside NN
O by IN
O making VBG
I it PRP
O harder JJR
O to TO
O oppose VB
I lawmakers NNS
O on IN
I other JJ
I health NN
I proposals NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O With IN
I the DT
I repeal NN
O of IN
I Section NN
I 89 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I we PRP
O can MD
O no RB
O longer RB
O say VB
I they PRP
O <apost>re VBP
O discouraging VBG
I businesses NNS
O from IN
O offering NN
I health NN
I plans NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Christine NNP
I Russell NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Chamber NNP
O of IN
I Commerce NNP
B <apost>s POS
I small-business NN
I advocate NN
O <period> <period>
O JUMPING NNP
I THE DT
I GUN NNP
O =colon= =colon=
I Sen<period> NNP
I Lloyd NNP
I Bentsen NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I D<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Texas NNP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O was VBD
O outraged VBN
O after IN
I a DT
I private JJ
I word NN
O to TO
I John NNP
I Motley NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I lobbyist NN
O for IN
I the DT
I National NNP
I Federation NNP
O of IN
I Independent NNP
I Business NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O resulted VBD
O in IN
I a DT
I news NN
I release NN
O saying VBG
O that IN
I the DT
I Senate NNP
I Finance NNP
I Committee NNP
I chairman NN
O would MD
O recommend VB
I repeal NN
O of IN
I Section NN
I 89 CD
O <period> <period>
O Even RB
O though IN
I the DT
I announcement NN
O was VBD
O true JJ
O in IN
I the DT
I end NN
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O was VBD
O issued VBN
O without IN
I the DT
I senator NN
B <apost>s POS
I permission NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O blew VBD
I it PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Motley NNP
O says VBZ
O apologetically RB
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I It PRP
O was VBD
I a DT
I timing NN
I mistake NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I PRISON-SHOP NNP
I BLUES NNPS
I =colon= =colon=
I Sen<period> NNP
I Strom NNP
I Thurmond NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I R<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I S<period>C NNP
I <period> <period>
O <rparen> <rparen>
O protests NNS
I pending VBG
I legislation NN
O to TO
O end VB
I the DT
I preference NN
B that IN
B the DT
I federal JJ
I prison NN
I system NN
O gets VBZ
O in IN
O selling VBG
I prisoner-made JJ
I furniture NN
O and CC
I other JJ
I goods NNS
O to TO
I government NN
I agencies NNS
O <period> <period>
I Small-business NN
I suppliers NNS
O want VBP
I prisons NNS
O to TO
O stop VB
O getting VBG
I high JJ
I priority NN
O <comma> <comma>
O especially RB
O as IN
I prison NN
I production NN
O grows VBZ
O with IN
I swelling VBG
I inmate NN
I populations NNS
O <period> <period>
I Last JJ
I year NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I prisons NNS
B <apost> POS
I sales NNS
O to TO
I the DT
I Pentagon NNP
O totaled VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 336 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I REPAIR NN
I SHOPS NNS
O SCRAP VBP
O for IN
I more JJR
I access NN
O to TO
I work VB
O on IN
I auto-emissions NNS
I systems NNS
O <period> <period>
I Groups NNS
O representing VBG
I some DT
I independent JJ
I auto-repair JJ
I shops NNS
O join VBP
I a DT
I compromise NN
O on IN
I the DT
I Clean NNP
I Air NNP
I legislation NN
O worked VBD
O out RP
O between IN
I environmentalists NNS
O and CC
I Rep<period> NNP
I Henry NNP
I Waxman NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I D<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Calif NNP
I <period> <period>
O <rparen> <rparen>
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I plan NN
O would MD
O increase VB
I the DT
I warranty NN
O on IN
I auto-emission NN
I systems NNS
O to TO
I eight CD
I years NNS
O or CC
I 80<comma>000 CD
I miles NNS
O from IN
I five CD
I years NNS
O or CC
I 50<comma>000 CD
O for IN
I major JJ
I parts NNS
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I the DT
I warranty NN
O on IN
I simpler JJR
I parts NNS
O would MD
O be VB
O lowered VBN
O to TO
I two CD
I years NNS
O or CC
I 24<comma>000 CD
I miles NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I garage NN
I owners NNS
O say VBP
I they PRP
O would MD
O benefit VB
O because IN
I car NN
I owners NNS
O would MD
O be VB
O less RBR
O likely JJ
O to TO
O go VB
O back RB
O to TO
I dealers NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I simpler JJR
I repairs NNS
O after IN
I two CD
I years NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I repair NN
I shops NNS
O are VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O united VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O however RB
O <period> <period>
I Shops NNS
O represented VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I Automotive NNP
I Service NNP
I Industry NNP
I Association NNP
O and CC
I the DT
I Motor NNP
I Equipment NNP
I Manufacturers NNP
I Association NNP
O oppose VB
I any DT
I increase NN
O in IN
I warranty NN
I length NN
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O say VBP
O the DT
O longer RB
I the DT
I warranty NN
O <comma> <comma>
O the DT
O longer RB
I customers NNS
O will MD
O automatically RB
O return VB
O to TO
I new-car NN
I dealers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O then RB
O find VB
I non-warranty NN
I work NN
B that WDT
O might MD
O otherwise RB
O go VB
O to TO
I repair VB
I shops NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I House NNP
I Energy NNP
I Committee NNP
O will MD
O debate VB
I the DT
I issue NN
B later RB
I this DT
I month NN
O <period> <period>
I Stan NNP
I Hathcock NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I Atlanta NNP
I garage NN
I owner NN
B who WP
O opposes VBZ
I a DT
I longer RB
I warranty NN
O <comma> <comma>
O estimates VBZ
O that IN
I the DT
I current JJ
I plan NN
O costs NNS
I him PRP
B as RB
I much JJ
I as IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 15<comma>000 CD
B a DT
I year NN
O in IN
I lost VBN
I business NN
O <period> <period>
I SMALL NNP
I TALK NNP
I =colon= =colon=
I Some DT
I 70 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I graduates NNS
B who WP
O recently RB
O earned VBD
I an DT
I M<period>B<period>A<period> NNP
I degree NN
O say VBP
I they PRP
O <apost>d MD
O prefer VB
O to TO
O work VB
O in IN
O or CC
O own VB
I a DT
I small JJ
I company NN
O <comma> <comma>
O yet RB
I most RBS
O take VB
I jobs NNS
O with IN
I large JJ
I concerns NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O says VBZ
I a DT
I survey NN
O by IN
I the DT
I Foster NNP
I McKay NNP
I Group NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I New NNP
I York NNP
I recruiting VBG
I firm NN
O <period><period><period> =colon=
O <period> <period>
I Cardinal NNP
I Scientific NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O of IN
I Waldorf NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Md<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O seeks VBZ
I a DT
I Small NNP
I Business NNP
I Innovation NNP
I Research NNP
I grant NN
O to TO
O produce VB
I a DT
I <quote> <quote>
I nozzle NN
I assembly NN
O for IN
I an DT
I Army NNP
I mass NN
I delousing VBG
I outfit NN
O <period> <period>
I Banc NNP
I One CD
I Corp<period> NNP
O said VBD
I Frank NNP
I E<period> NNP
I McKinney NNP
O plans VBZ
O to TO
O retire VB
O as IN
I the DT
I bank NN
I holding VBG
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I president NN
O effective JJ
I Jan<period> NNP
I 12 CD
O <period> <period>
I Banc NNP
I One CD
O said VBD
O <quote> <quote>
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O contemplated VBN
O <quote> <quote>
O that IN
I John NNP
I B<period> NNP
I McCoy NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I chairman NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I executive JJ
I officer NN
O <comma> <comma>
O will MD
O assume VB
I the DT
I additional JJ
I position NN
O of IN
I president NN
O upon IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I McKinney NNP
B <apost>s POS
I retirement NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I McKinney NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 50 CD
I years NNS
O old JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
I chairman NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I executive NN
O of IN
I American NNP
I Fletcher NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Indianapolis NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O when WRB
I that DT
I bank NN
I holding VBG
I company NN
O merged VBN
O into IN
I Banc NNP
I One CD
O in IN
I January NNP
I 1987 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I company NN
O said VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I McKinney NNP
O plans VBZ
O to TO
O retire VB
O because IN
I the DT
I process NN
O of IN
O affiliating VBG
I American NNP
I Fletcher NNP
O into IN
I Banc NNP
I One CD
O <quote> <quote>
O is VBZ
O considered VBN
O completed VBN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I McKinney NNP
O will MD
O continue VB
O as IN
I chairman NN
O of IN
I the DT
I board NN
O and CC
I chairman NN
O of IN
I the DT
I executive JJ
I committee NN
O of IN
I Banc NNP
I One CD
I Indiana NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I successor NN
I company NN
O to TO
I American NNP
I Fletcher NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O will MD
O no RB
O longer RB
O be VB
O active JJ
O in IN
I day-to-day JJ
I management NN
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O will MD
O remain VB
O on IN
I the DT
I Banc NNP
I One CD
I board NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Treasury NNP
O plans VBZ
O to TO
O raise VB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>55 CD
I billion CD
O in IN
I new JJ
I cash NN
O with IN
I the DT
I sale NN
B Monday NNP
O of IN
I about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 15<period>6 CD
I billion CD
O in IN
I short-term JJ
I bills NNS
O to TO
O redeem VB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 14<period>1 CD
I billion CD
O in IN
I maturing VBG
I bills NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I offering NN
O will MD
O be VB
O divided VBN
O evenly RB
O between IN
I 13-week JJ
I and CC
I 26-week JJ
I bills NNS
O maturing VBG
O on IN
I Jan<period> NNP
I 25 CD
I <comma> <comma>
I 1990 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I April NNP
I 26 CD
I <comma> <comma>
I 1990 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O respectively RB
O <period> <period>
I Tenders NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I bills NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O available JJ
O in IN
I minimum JJ
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 10<comma>000 CD
I denominations NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O must MD
O be VB
O received VBN
O by IN
I 1 CD
I p<period>m<period> NN
I EDT NNP
I Monday NNP
O at IN
I the DT
I Treasury NNP
O or CC
O at IN
I Federal NNP
I Reserve NNP
I banks NNS
I or CC
I branches NNS
O <period> <period>
I Moody NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Investors NNP
I Service NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O lowered VBD
I ratings NNS
O on IN
I about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 650 CD
I million CD
O of IN
I Beatrice NNP
I Co<period> NNP
I debt NN
O <comma> <comma>
O citing VBG
I the DT
I closely RB
I held VBN
I Chicago NNP
I food NN
I concern NN
B <apost>s POS
I proposed VBN
I recapitalization NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I ratings NNS
I concern VBP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O downgraded VBD
I Beatrice NNP
I notes NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Euronotes NNS
O and CC
I certain JJ
I industrial JJ
I revenue NN
I bonds NNS
O to TO
I single-B-1 JJ
O from IN
I Ba-3 JJ
O and CC
I the DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I subordinated VBN
I debentures NNS
O to TO
I single-B-3 NNP
O from IN
I single-B-2 NN
O <period> <period>
I Moody NNP
B <apost>s POS
O said VBD
I the DT
I proposed VBN
I recaptilization NN
O may MD
O <quote> <quote>
O limit VB
I the DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I ability NN
O to TO
O realize VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I profit NN
I potential JJ
O <quote> <quote>
O and CC
O that IN
O paying VBG
I dividends NNS
O from IN
I a DT
I new JJ
I series NN
O of IN
I preferred JJ
O could MD
O squeeze VB
O <quote> <quote>
I basic JJ
I business NN
I operations NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I A DT
I Beatrice NNP
I spokesman NN
O did VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O return VB
I calls VBZ
O seeking VBG
I comment VB
O <period> <period>
I Beatrice NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O went VBD
O private JJ
O in IN
I an DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 8<period>2 CD
I billion CD
I leveraged JJ
I buy-out NN
O in IN
I 1986 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I last JJ
I month NN
O that IN
I it PRP
O might MD
O borrow VB
O again RB
O to TO
O help VB
O pay VB
I investors NNS
B as RB
I much JJ
I as IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 983 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I preferred JJ
I stock NN
O and CC
I debt NN
I securities NNS
O <period> <period>
O When WRB
I the DT
I Soviets NNPS
O announced VBD
I their PRP<dollar>
I last JJ
I soldier NN
O had VBD
O left VBN
I Afghanistan NNP
O in IN
I February NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I voices NNS
O of IN
I skepticism NN
O were VBD
O all DT
O but CC
O drowned VBN
O out IN
O by IN
I an DT
I international JJ
I chorus NN
O of IN
I euphoria NN
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O was VBD
O <quote> <quote>
I the DT
I Soviets NNPS
B <apost> <quote>
I Vietnam NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I Kabul NNP
I regime NN
O would MD
O fall VB
O <period> <period>
I Millions NNS
O of IN
I refugees NNS
O would MD
O rush VB
O home NN
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I resistance NN
I government NN
O would MD
O walk VB
O into IN
I Kabul NNP
O <period> <period>
I Those DT
B who WP
O bought VBD
I that DT
I illusion NN
O are VBP
O now RB
O bewildered VBN
O <period> <period>
I Eight CD
I months NNS
O after IN
I Gen<period> NNP
I Boris NNP
I Gromov NNP
O walked VBD
O across IN
I the DT
I bridge NN
O into IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period>S<period>R<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Soviet-controlled JJ
I regime NN
O remains VBZ
O in IN
I Kabul NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I refugees NNS
O sit VBP
O in IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I camps NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I the DT
I restoration NN
O of IN
I Afghan JJ
I freedom NN
O seems VBZ
O as IN
O far RB
O off IN
O as IN
O ever RB
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I there EX
O never RB
O was VBD
I a DT
I chance NN
O that IN
I the DT
I Afghan JJ
I resistance NN
O would MD
O overthrow VB
I the DT
I Kabul NNP
I regime NN
O quickly RB
O and CC
O easily RB
O <period> <period>
I Soviet JJ
I leaders NNS
O said VBD
I they PRP
O would MD
O support VB
I their PRP<dollar>
I Kabul NNP
I clients NNS
O by IN
I all DT
I means VBZ
O necessary JJ
O -- =colon=
O and CC
O did VBD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O would MD
O fully RB
O support VB
I the DT
I resistance NN
O -- =colon=
O and CC
O did VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O <period> <period>
O With IN
I the DT
I February NNP
I 1987 CD
I U<period>N<period> NNP
I accords NNS
O <quote> <quote>
O relating VBG
O to TO
I Afghanistan NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I the DT
I Soviet NNP
I Union NNP
O got VBD
I everything NN
B it PRP
O needed VBD
O to TO
O consolidate VB
I permanent JJ
I control NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I terms NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I Geneva NNP
I accords NNS
O leave VBP
I Moscow NNP
O free JJ
O to TO
O provide VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I clients NNS
O in IN
I Kabul NNP
O with IN
I assistance NN
O of IN
I any DT
I kind NN
O -- =colon=
O including VBG
I the DT
I return NN
O of IN
I Soviet JJ
I ground NN
I forces NNS
O -- =colon=
O while IN
O requiring VBG
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O and CC
I Pakistan NNP
O to TO
O cut VB
O off IN
I aid NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I only JJ
I fly NN
O in IN
I the DT
I Soviet JJ
I ointment NN
O was VBD
I the DT
I last-minute JJ
I addition NN
O of IN
I a DT
I unilateral JJ
I American JJ
I caveat NN
I <comma> <comma>
O that IN
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I aid NN
O to TO
I the DT
I resistance NN
O would MD
O continue VB
O as RB
O long RB
O as IN
I Soviet JJ
I aid NN
O to TO
I Kabul NNP
O did VBD
O <period> <period>
O But CC
O as RB
O soon RB
O as IN
I the DT
I accords NNS
O were VBD
O signed VBN
O <comma> <comma>
I American JJ
I officials NNS
O sharply RB
O reduced VBN
I aid NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I February NNP
I 1989 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O when WRB
I the DT
I Soviets NNPS
O said VBD
I they PRP
O had VBD
O completed VBN
I their PRP<dollar>
I pullout NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O cut NN
I it PRP
O further JJ
O <period> <period>
O Not RB
O so RB
I the DT
I Soviets NNPS
O <period> <period>
I Gen<period> NNP
I Gromov NNP
I himself PRP
O said VBD
I Soviet JJ
I troops NNS
O expected VBN
O to TO
O leave VB
O behind IN
I more JJR
I than IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1 CD
I billion CD
O of IN
I military JJ
I equipment NN
I and CC
I installations NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I Kabul NNP
I regime NN
O <period> <period>
O Since IN
I the DT
I troop NN
I withdrawal NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Moscow NNP
O has VBZ
O poured VBN
O in IN
I an DT
I additional JJ
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 200 CD
I to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 300 CD
I million CD
O worth JJ
O per IN
I month NN
O -- =colon=
I nearly RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2 CD
I billion CD
O since IN
I February NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O equivalent NN
O to TO
I the DT
I total JJ
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I aid NN
O to TO
I the DT
I resistance NN
O in IN
I nine CD
I years NNS
O <period> <period>
I This DT
O includes VBZ
I what WP
B Deputy NNP
I Foreign NNP
I Minister NNP
I Yuli NNP
I Vorontsov NNP
O fetchingly RB
O called VBD
O <quote> <quote>
I new JJ
I peaceful JJ
I long-range JJ
I weapons NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O including VBG
I more JJR
I than IN
I 800 CD
I SCUD NNP
I missiles NNS
O <period> <period>
O By IN
I early JJ
I May NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Moscow NNP
O had VBD
O delivered VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O for IN
I example NN
O <comma> <comma>
I 1<comma>000 CD
I trucks NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I about IN
I 100 CD
I tanks NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I artillery NN
O and CC
I hundreds NNS
O of IN
I other JJ
I combat NN
I vehicles NNS
O <period> <period>
I Later RB
I that DT
I month NN
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O added VBD
I an DT
I entire JJ
I tank NN
I brigade NN
O <comma> <comma>
O including VBG
I 120 CD
I T-72 NN
I tanks NNS
O and CC
I more JJR
I than IN
I 40 CD
I BMP NN
I state-of-the-art JJ
I infantry NN
I fighting VBG
I vehicles NNS
O <period> <period>
O By IN
I September NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I new JJ
I Reinforced NNP
I Motorized NNP
I Rifle NNP
I Brigade NNP
O with IN
I an DT
I additional JJ
I 300 CD
I combat NN
I vehicles NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I 1<comma>000 CD
I more JJR
I trucks NNS
O and CC
I 10<comma>000 CD
I Soviet-trained JJ
I Afghan JJ
I troops NNS
O had VBD
O arrived VBN
O in IN
I Kandahar NNP
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I the DT
I last JJ
I few JJ
I weeks NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Moscow NNP
O has VBZ
O added VBN
I FROG-7B NN
I missiles NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I bomber NN
I version NN
O of IN
I the DT
I An-12 NN
O <comma> <comma>
I MiG-23BN NN
I high-altitude JJ
I aircraft NN
O <comma> <comma>
I MiG-29s NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O can MD
O outfly VB
I Pakistan NNP
B <apost>s POS
I U<period>S<period>-built JJ
I F16s NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Sukhoi NNP
I SU-27 NN
I fighter-bombers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O can MD
O outfly VB
I the DT
I MiG-29s NNS
O <period> <period>
I Moscow NNP
O claims VBZ
I this DT
O is VBZ
O all DT
O needed VBN
O to TO
O protect VB
I the DT
I Kabul NNP
I regime NN
O against IN
I the DT
I guerrilla NN
I resistance NN
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O is VBZ
O well-known JJ
O that IN
I the DT
I regular JJ
I Afghan JJ
I infantry NN
O is VBZ
O filled VBN
O with IN
I reluctant JJ
I conscripts NNS
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I this DT
O is VBZ
O not RB
I the DT
I entire JJ
I Afghan JJ
I army NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O no RB
O longer RB
I Kabul NNP
B <apost>s POS
I only RB
I military JJ
I force NN
O <period> <period>
I Complete JJ
I units NNS
O have VBP
O been VBN
O trained VBN
O and CC
O indoctrinated VBN
O in IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period>S<period>R<period> NNP
O and CC
I other JJ
I East NNP
I bloc NN
I nations NNS
O <colon> =colon=
I 30<comma>000 CD
I to TO
I 40<comma>000 CD
O of IN
I these DT
I troops NNS
O have VBP
O returned VBN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I addition NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I regime NN
O has VBZ
O established VBN
I well-paid JJ
I paramilitary JJ
I forces NNS
O totaling VBG
I more JJR
O than IN
O 100<comma>000 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O including VBG
I 35<comma>000 CD
I Soviet-trained JJ
I troops NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I Interior NNP
I Ministry NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I KHAD<bslash><fslash>WAD NN
O <rparen> <rparen>
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O still RB
O is VBZ
O directed VBN
O by IN
I 1<comma>500 CD
I Soviet NNP
I KGB NNP
I officers NNS
O <period> <period>
O Even RB
O if IN
I not RB
I all PDT
I these DT
I forces NNS
O are VBP
O committed VBN
O to TO
I the DT
I regime NN
O <comma> <comma>
I they PRP
O are VBP
O now RB
O dependent JJ
O on IN
I it PRP
O <period> <period>
O And CC
I thousands NNS
O of IN
I Afghan JJ
I children NNS
O have VBP
O been VBN
O taken VBN
O to TO
I the DT
I Soviet NNP
I Union NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O where WRB
I they PRP
O are VBP
I hostage NN
O for IN
I the DT
I behavior NN
O of IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I families NNS
O <period> <period>
O Since IN
I 1981 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I Indian NNP
I military JJ
I advisers NNS
O have VBP
O been VBN
O assisting VBG
I the DT
I Kabul NNP
I regime NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I preparation NN
O for IN
I the DT
I withdrawal NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Moscow NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Kabul NNP
O and CC
I New NNP
I Delhi NNP
O signed VBD
I two CD
I agreements NNS
O for IN
I several JJ
I hundred CD
I newly RB
I civilian JJ
I Indian NNP
I experts NNS
O to TO
O replace VB
I some DT
O of IN
I the DT
I more RBR
I visible JJ
I Soviet JJ
I military JJ
I personnel NNS
O <period> <period>
I Cuban JJ
I military JJ
I personnel NNS
O also RB
O have VBP
O been VBN
O active JJ
O in IN
I Afghanistan NNP
O since IN
I 1979 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Soviets NNPS
O cut NN
I a DT
I deal NN
O with IN
I Iran NNP
O =colon= =colon=
I a DT
I future NN
I Iranian JJ
I role NN
O in IN
I Afghanistan NNP
O in IN
I exchange NN
O for IN
I Iranian JJ
I support NN
O of IN
I Soviet JJ
I policy NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I deal NN
O was VBD
O symbolized VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I restoration NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Shi<apost>ite NNP
I Sultan NNP
I Ali NNP
I Keshtmand NNP
O to TO
I the DT
I Afghan JJ
I prime JJ
I ministry NN
O <period> <period>
O Moreover RB
O <comma> <comma>
I serious JJ
I questions NNS
O have VBP
O been VBN
O raised VBN
O about IN
I the DT
I claimed VBN
I withdrawal NN
O of IN
I Soviet JJ
I forces NNS
O <period> <period>
O Before IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I assassination NN
O in IN
I 1988 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I President NNP
I Zia NNP
O of IN
I Pakistan NNP
O repeatedly RB
O stated VBD
O that IN
I fresh JJ
I Soviet JJ
I troops NNS
O were VBD
O being VBG
O inserted VBN
O into IN
I Afghanistan NNP
O even RB
O as IN
I others NNS
O were VBD
O ostentatiously RB
O withdrawn VBN
O <period> <period>
I Rep<period> NNP
I Bill NNP
I McCollum NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I R<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Fla<period> NNP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O reports NNS
O that IN
I these DT
O included VBD
I 20<comma>000 CD
I to TO
I 30<comma>000 CD
I Soviet NNP
I Central NNP
I Asian NNP
I KGB NNP
I Border NNP
I Guards NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
O ethnically RB
O indistinguishable JJ
O from IN
I Afghans NNPS
O and CC
O wearing VBG
I unmarked JJ
I uniforms NNS
O <period> <period>
O Meanwhile RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Kabul NNP
I regime NN
O is VBZ
O increasingly RB
O successful JJ
O at IN
O portraying VBG
I the DT
I resistance NN
O as IN
I bloody-minded JJ
I fanatics NNS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I this DT
B they PRP
O are VBP
O aided VBN
O by IN
I years NNS
O of IN
I American NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I European JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I Pakistani JJ
I and CC
I Saudi NNP
I support NN
O for IN
I the DT
I most RBS
I extreme JJ
I factions NNS
O -- =colon=
I radical JJ
I Islamic NNP
I fanatics NNS
O with IN
I leaders NNS
B whose WP<dollar>
I policies NNS
O are VBP
I anathema NN
O to TO
I the DT
I Afghan JJ
I public NN
O <period> <period>
I This DT
I heavy NN
I outside IN
I support NN
O for IN
I the DT
I worst JJS
O has VBZ
O undermined VBN
I better JJR
I <comma> <comma>
I moderate JJ
I leaders NNS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I autumn NN
B last JJ
I year NN
O <comma> <comma>
O for IN
I example NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I regime NN
I garrison NN
O at IN
I Kandahar NNP
O was VBD
O prepared VBN
O to TO
O surrender VB
I the DT
I city NN
O to TO
I resistance NN
I moderates NNS
O <period> <period>
O At IN
I the DT
I last JJ
I minute NN
O <comma> <comma>
O however RB
O <comma> <comma>
I Pakistani JJ
I officials NNS
O sent VBD
O in IN
I Gulbuddin NNP
I Hekhmatyar NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O perhaps RB
I the DT
I most RBS
I hated VBD
I and CC
I feared VBD
O of IN
I the DT
I extremists NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I a DT
I demand NN
O that IN
I the DT
I surrender NN
O be VB
O made VBN
O to TO
I his PRP<dollar>
I forces NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I deal NN
O fell VBD
O through IN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Kandahar NNP
O remains VBZ
I a DT
I major JJ
I regime NN
I base NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I resistance NN
O lacks VBZ
O not RB
O only JJ
I air NN
I power NN
O <comma> <comma>
I armor NN
O and CC
I expertise NN
O but CC
O often RB
I such JJ
I essentials NNS
O as IN
I maps NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I mine NN
I detectors NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
O even JJ
I winter NN
I gloves NNS
O <period> <period>
I Experienced VBN
I resistance NN
I commanders NNS
O wanted VBD
O to TO
O use VB
I guerrilla NN
I action NN
O and CC
I siege NN
I tactics NNS
O to TO
O wear VB
O down RP
I the DT
I regime NN
O <period> <period>
O Instead RB
O <comma> <comma>
I they PRP
O were VBD
O pressured VBN
O by IN
I Pakistan NNP
B <apost>s POS
I ISI NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I channel NN
O for IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I support NN
O <comma> <comma>
O into IN
O attacking VBG
I Jalalabad NNP
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O took VBD
I more JJR
I than IN
I 25 CD
I <percent> NN
I casualties NNS
O <colon> =colon=
I journalists NNS
O report VBP
O that IN
I they PRP
O faced VBD
I minefields NNS
O without IN
I mine NN
I detectors NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I wonder NN
O is VBZ
O not RB
O that IN
I the DT
I resistance NN
O has VBZ
O failed VBN
O to TO
O topple VB
I the DT
I Kabul NNP
I regime NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O that IN
I it PRP
O continues VBZ
O to TO
O exist VB
O and CC
O fight NN
O at IN
O all DT
O <period> <period>
I Last JJ
I summer NN
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I response NN
O to TO
I congressional JJ
I criticism NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I State NNP
I Department NNP
O and CC
I the DT
I CIA NNP
O said VBD
I they PRP
O had VBD
O resumed VBN
I military JJ
I aid NN
O to TO
I the DT
I resistance NN
B months NNS
O after IN
I it PRP
O was VBD
O cut VBN
O off IN
O <colon> =colon=
O but CC
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O not RB
O clear JJ
I how WRB
I much NN
O is VBZ
O being VBG
O sent VBN
O or CC
O when WRB
I it PRP
O will MD
O arrive VB
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I months NNS
B the DT
I resistance NN
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O defenseless JJ
O against IN
I air NN
I attack NN
O <period> <period>
O Thus RB
O far RB
I there EX
O is VBZ
I no DT
I indication NN
O that IN
I they PRP
O have VBP
O been VBN
O re-supplied VBN
O with IN
I Stingers NNPS
O or CC
I other JJ
I anti-aircraft JJ
I weapons NNS
O <period> <period>
O Indeed RB
O <comma> <comma>
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I officials NNS
O have VBP
O indicated VBN
O to TO
I the DT
I press NN
O that IN
I the DT
I continuation NN
O of IN
I aid NN
O depends VBZ
O on IN
I what WP
I success NN
B the DT
I weakened VBN
I resistance NN
O achieves VBZ
O by IN
I the DT
I end NN
O of IN
I this DT
I year NN
O <period> <period>
I Moscow NNP
I and CC
I Kabul NNP
O must MD
O have VB
O found VBN
I that DT
I information NN
O useful JJ
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I a DT
I decade NN
B U<period>S<period> NNP
I policy NN
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O incoherent JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O based VBN
O on IN
I miscalculation NN
O and CC
I the DT
I defense NN
O of IN
I bureaucratic JJ
I and CC
I political JJ
I turf NN
O <period> <period>
I No DT
I settlement NN
O negotiated VBN
O by IN
I others NNS
O can MD
O force VB
I the DT
I Afghan JJ
I people NNS
O to TO
O give VB
O up IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I struggle NN
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I cutoff NN
O of IN
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I military JJ
I aid NN
O would MD
O merely RB
O abandon VB
I them PRP
O to TO
O die VB
O in IN
I vain JJ
O <period> <period>
I Creation NN
O of IN
I a DT
I new JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I realistic JJ
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I policy NN
O is VBZ
O long JJ
O overdue JJ
O <period> <period>
I Ms<period> NNP
I Klass NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I editor NN
I and CC
I co-author NN
O of IN
O <quote> <quote>
I Afghanistan NNP
O =colon= =colon=
I The DT
I Great NNP
I Game NNP
O Revisited NNP
O <quote> <quote>
O <lparen> <lparen>
I Freedom NNP
I House NNP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O <comma> <comma>
O directs VBZ
I the DT
I Freedom NNP
I House NNP
I program NN
O on IN
I Afghanistan<bslash><fslash>Southwest NNP
I Asia NNP
O <period> <period>
I Nothing NN
O stirred VBD
I the DT
I soul NN
O of IN
I Ronald NNP
I Reagan NNP
O and CC
I his PRP<dollar>
I disciples NNS
O as RB
O much JJ
O as IN
I the DT
I crusade NN
O to TO
O aid VB
I Nicaragua NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Contra NNP
I rebels NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I the DT
I dream NN
O of IN
O building VBG
I a DT
I space-based JJ
I defense NN
I shield NN
O to TO
O knock VB
O out IN
I Soviet JJ
I nuclear JJ
I missiles NNS
O <period> <period>
O Yet RB
O under IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Reagan NNP
B <apost>s POS
I preferred JJ
I successor NN
O <comma> <comma>
I President NNP
I Bush NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I those DT
I two CD
I cherished VBN
I national-security NN
I causes NNS
O are VBP
O withering VBG
O on IN
I the DT
I vine NN
O <period> <period>
O And CC
O <comma> <comma>
O surprisingly RB
O <comma> <comma>
I little RB
I more JJR
O than IN
I a DT
I whimper NN
O of IN
I protest NN
O is VBZ
O being VBG
O heard VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O even RB
O though IN
I Reaganauts NNS
O once RB
O breathed VBD
I fire NN
O supporting VBG
I the DT
I Contras NNPS
O and CC
I the DT
I Strategic NNP
I Defense NNP
I Initiative NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I programs NNS
O have VBP
I arthritis NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Rep<period> NNP
I Henry NNP
I Hyde NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I conservative JJ
I Republican NNP
O from IN
I Illinois NNP
O <period> <period>
O Yet RB
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O asserts VBZ
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I you PRP
O look VBP
O around IN
O <period><period><period> =colon=
O and CC
I you PRP
O say VBP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Who WP
O are VBP
I the DT
I leaders NNS
O ? <period>
I Who WP
O is VBZ
O going VBG
O to TO
O carry VB
I the DT
I water NN
O ? <period>
O <apost> <quote>
O <quote> <quote>
I It PRP
O is VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O surprising JJ
O that IN
I President NNP
I Bush NNP
O has VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O led VBN
I a DT
I crusade NN
O to TO
O pump VB
O up IN
I the DT
I Contras NNPS
O or CC
I SDI NNP
O <period> <period>
O Though IN
I he PRP
O nominally RB
O supports VBZ
I both DT
I programs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Bush NNP
O has VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O been VBN
I a DT
I passionate JJ
I champion NN
O of IN
I either DT
I cause NN
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Reagan NNP
O was VBD
O <period> <period>
I What WP
O <apost>s VBZ
O surprising JJ
O is VBZ
O that IN
I there EX
O is VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
I more JJR
O of IN
I a DT
I conservative JJ
I outcry NN
O as IN
I the DT
I Bush NNP
I administration NN
O lets VBZ
I the DT
I programs NNS
O slip VBP
O down RP
I the DT
I national-priority JJ
I list NN
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I combination NN
O of IN
I factors NNS
O -- =colon=
I a DT
I weariness NN
O among IN
I some DT
I conservatives NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I decline NN
O in IN
I the DT
I perception NN
O of IN
I a DT
I Soviet JJ
I threat NN
O and CC
I a DT
I preoccupation NN
O with IN
I other JJ
I issues NNS
O -- =colon=
O seem VB
O to TO
O explain VB
I the DT
I strange JJ
I tranquility NN
O <period> <period>
O Above IN
O all DT
O <comma> <comma>
O though RB
O <comma> <comma>
I conservative JJ
I Republicans NNPS
B who WP
O have VBP
O championed VBN
O both DT
I the DT
I Contras NNPS
O and CC
I SDI NNP
O are VBP
O reluctant JJ
O to TO
O attack VB
I a DT
I Republican NNP
I president NN
O for IN
O failing VBG
O to TO
O do VB
I more JJR
O -- =colon=
O though IN
I that DT
I reluctance NN
O may MD
O be VB
O receding VBG
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O want VBP
O to TO
O complain VB
O <comma> <comma>
I we PRP
O want VBP
O to TO
O say VB
I something NN
O about IN
I it PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I we PRP
O <apost>re VBP
O going VBG
O to TO
O as IN
I it PRP
O gets VBZ
O worse JJR
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Rep<period> NNP
I Dan NNP
I Burton NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I Indiana NNP
I Republican NNP
B who WP
O has VBZ
O been VBN
I a DT
I staunch JJ
I Contra NNP
I backer NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O But CC
I it PRP
O <apost>s VBZ
O like IN
O kicking VBG
I your PRP<dollar>
I father NN
O in IN
I the DT
I pants NNS
O <period> <period>
I You PRP
O hate VBP
O to TO
O do VB
I it PRP
O because IN
I he PRP
O <apost>s VBZ
I your PRP<dollar>
I father NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Burton NNP
O says VBZ
I conservatives NNS
B <apost> POS
I unhappiness NN
O with IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Bush NNP
B <apost>s POS
I cautious JJ
I handling NN
O of IN
I the DT
I recent JJ
I unsuccessful JJ
I coup NN
O in IN
I Panama NNP
O will MD
O make VB
I them PRP
O more RBR
O willing JJ
O to TO
O speak VB
O out RB
O <period> <period>
O Of IN
I course NN
O <comma> <comma>
O neither DT
I President NNP
I Bush NNP
O nor CC
I the DT
I Congress NNP
O has VBZ
O actually RB
O abandoned VBN
I the DT
I Contras NNPS
O or CC
I SDI NNP
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Bush NNP
O has VBZ
O struck VBN
I a DT
I deal NN
O with IN
I congressional JJ
I leaders NNS
O to TO
O provide VB
I nonlethal JJ
I aid NN
O to TO
I the DT
I Contras NNPS
O until IN
I Nicaragua NNP
O holds VBZ
I national JJ
I elections NNS
B next JJ
I February NNP
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I the DT
I administration NN
O has VBZ
O dropped VBN
I any DT
I effort NN
O to TO
O win VB
I military JJ
I aid NN
O for IN
I the DT
I rebels NNS
O <period> <period>
O And CC
I the DT
I administration NN
B <apost>s POS
I deal NN
O with IN
I Congress NNP
O gives VBZ
I several JJ
I congressional JJ
I committees NNS
B the DT
I right NN
O to TO
O cut VB
O off IN
I even RB
I humanitarian JJ
I aid NN
B next JJ
I month NN
O <comma> <comma>
O though IN
I the DT
I committees NNS
O are VBP
O likely JJ
O to TO
O let VB
I aid NN
O continue VB
O until IN
I February NNP
O <period> <period>
I Most JJS
I analysts NNS
O think VBP
I there EX
O <apost>s VBZ
I little JJ
I prospect NN
I the DT
I Contras NNPS
O can MD
O be VB
I a DT
I significant JJ
I fighting NN
I force NN
O without IN
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I arms NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O after IN
I the DT
I February NNP
I election NN
B their PRP<dollar>
I future NN
O in IN
I any DT
I form NN
O will MD
O be VB
O murky JJ
O at IN
O best JJS
O <period> <period>
O Instead RB
O of IN
O focusing VBG
O on IN
I the DT
I Contras NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Bush NNP
O has VBZ
O switched VBN
O to TO
O urging VBG
I members NNS
O of IN
I Congress NNP
O -- =colon=
O most RBS
O recently RB
O in IN
I a DT
I White NNP
I House NNP
I meeting NN
B yesterday NN
O -- =colon=
O to TO
O approve VB
I financing NN
O for IN
I the DT
I election NN
I campaign NN
O of IN
I political JJ
I opponents NNS
O of IN
I Nicaragua NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Sandinista NNP
I government NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I administration NN
O continues VBZ
O to TO
O support VB
I SDI NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I Star NNP
I Wars NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I it PRP
O recently RB
O lobbied VBD
O to TO
O persuade VB
I the DT
I Senate NNP
O to TO
O restore VB
I some DT
O of IN
I the DT
I funds NNS
B it PRP
O planned VBD
O to TO
O cut VB
O from IN
I the DT
I program NN
O <period> <period>
O And CC
I just RB
I last JJ
I week NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Defense NNP
I Secretary NNP
I Dick NNP
I Cheney NNP
O gave VBD
I a DT
I strong JJ
I speech NN
O listing NN
O <quote> <quote>
I compelling JJ
I reasons NNS
O <quote> <quote>
O to TO
O push VB
O ahead RB
O with IN
I SDI NNP
O and CC
O saying VBG
I he PRP
O <apost>d MD
O urge VB
I President NNP
I Bush NNP
O to TO
O veto VB
I a DT
I defense NN
I bill NN
O with IN
I <quote> <quote>
I inadequate JJ
I <quote> <quote>
I funding NN
O for IN
I the DT
I program NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I the DT
I strong JJ
I pitch NN
O by IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Cheney NNP
O may MD
O be VB
O too RB
O little JJ
O too RB
O late JJ
O to TO
O prevent VB
I damage NN
O to TO
I SDI NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I House NNP
O has VBZ
O already RB
O voted VBN
O for IN
I a DT
I deep JJ
I cut NN
O in IN
I funding NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O in IN
I the DT
I end NN
B the DT
I program NN
B <apost>s POS
I backers NNS
O will MD
O be VB
O hard RB
O pressed VBN
O to TO
O head VB
O off IN
I some DT
I reduction NN
O in IN
I spending NN
B next JJ
I year NN
O <period> <period>
O And CC
O while IN
I the DT
I defense NN
I secretary NN
O is VBZ
O speaking VBG
O out IN
O <comma> <comma>
I President NNP
I Bush NNP
I himself PRP
O has VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O launched VBN
I any DT
I high-visibility JJ
I campaign NN
O to TO
O drum VB
O up IN
I support NN
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
I President NNP
I Reagan NNP
O did VBD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I administration NN
O also RB
O acknowledges VBZ
O that IN
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O pursuing VBG
I Mr<period> NNP
I Reagan NNP
B <apost>s POS
I original JJ
I vision NN
O of IN
I an DT
I <quote> <quote>
I impenetrable JJ
I shield NN
I <quote> <quote>
O protecting VBG
I the DT
I whole JJ
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O rather RB
I a DT
I more RBR
I modest JJ
I version NN
O <period> <period>
O More RBR
O ominous JJ
O to TO
I SDI NNP
I supporters NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Bush NNP
I administration NN
O appears VBZ
O to TO
O have VB
O tacitly RB
O accepted VBN
I a DT
I new JJ
I arms-control NN
I proposal NN
O from IN
I the DT
I Soviet NNP
I Union NNP
B that WDT
O spells VBZ
I long-term JJ
I trouble NN
O for IN
I Star NNP
I Wars NNPS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Soviets NNPS
O have VBP
O agreed VBN
O to TO
O complete VB
I a DT
I treaty NN
O cutting VBG
I strategic JJ
I weapons NNS
O without IN
O including VBG
I restrictions NNS
O on IN
I space-based JJ
I defenses NNS
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I the DT
I Soviets NNPS
O also RB
O are VBP
O insisting VBG
O that IN
I they PRP
O will MD
O reserve VB
I the DT
I right NN
O to TO
O withdraw VB
O from IN
I the DT
I completed VBN
I strategic-arms JJ
I treaty NN
O later RB
O on IN
O if IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O does VBZ
I SDI NNP
I testing NN
I or CC
I deployment NN
B that IN
B the DT
I Soviets NNPS
O think VBP
O violates VBZ
I the DT
I existing VBG
I anti-ballistic-missile JJ
I treaty NN
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O will MD
O be VB
O hard JJ
O down RP
I the DT
I road NN
O to TO
O persuade VB
I Congress NNP
O to TO
O approve VB
I money NN
O for IN
I SDI NNP
I plans VBZ
O if IN
I lawmakers NNS
O fear VBP
I those DT
I plans NNS
O could MD
O scuttle VB
I a DT
I completed VBN
I treaty NN
O <period> <period>
O As IN
I a DT
I result NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Frank NNP
I Gaffney NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I former JJ
I Reagan NNP
I Pentagon NNP
I aide NN
B who WP
O now RB
O heads VBZ
I the DT
I Center NNP
O for IN
I Security NNP
I Policy NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O charges VBZ
O that IN
I the DT
I administration NN
B <apost>s POS
I <quote> <quote>
I professions NNS
O of IN
I continued VBN
I commitment NN
O to TO
I development NN
I and CC
I deployment NN
O of IN
I the DT
I SDI NNP
I program NN
O strain NN
I credulity NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Still RB
O <comma> <comma>
I proponents NNS
O may MD
O be VB
O shying VBG
O away RB
O from IN
I more JJR
I drumbeating NN
O because IN
I they PRP
O sense VBP
I political JJ
I tides NNS
O have VBP
O turned VBN
O against IN
O arming NN
I the DT
I Nicaraguan JJ
I rebels NNS
O or CC
O boosting VBG
I spending NN
O on IN
I SDI NNP
O -- =colon=
O particularly RB
O when WRB
I the DT
I public NN
O perceives VBZ
I the DT
I Soviet JJ
I threat NN
O is VBZ
O declining VBG
O under IN
I Mikhail NNP
I Gorbachev NNP
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I fact NN
O <comma> <comma>
O because IN
I communism NN
O seems VBZ
O to TO
O be VB
O beating VBG
I a DT
I global JJ
I retreat NN
O <comma> <comma>
I some DT
I conservatives NNS
O may MD
O simply RB
O be VB
O so RB
O pleased VBN
O that IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I anti-communist JJ
I philosophy NN
O is VBZ
O prevailing VBG
O that IN
I they PRP
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O have VB
I the DT
I fire NN
O at IN
I the DT
I moment NN
O to TO
O push VB
I controversial JJ
I programs NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I short NN
O of IN
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O that IN
I the DT
I most RBS
I hard-bitten JJ
O among IN
I us PRP
O can MD
O not RB
O get VB
O into IN
I too RB
I sour VB
I a DT
I mood NN
O with IN
I communism NN
O collapsing VBG
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Mitchell NNP
I Daniels NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I former JJ
I Reagan NNP
I White NNP
I House NNP
I aide NN
B who WP
O now RB
O is VBZ
I president NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Hudson NNP
I Institute NNP
O <period> <period>
I Some DT
I activists NNS
O are VBP
O toiling VBG
O to TO
O raise VB
I the DT
I profile NN
O of IN
I the DT
I two CD
I causes NNS
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I they PRP
O say VBP
I they PRP
O ca MD
O n<apost>t RB
O make VB
I much JJ
I headway NN
O because IN
O of IN
I a DT
I lack NN
O of IN
I willing JJ
I leaders NNS
O in IN
I a DT
I position NN
O to TO
O turn VB
I the DT
I tide NN
O <period> <period>
I One CD
I longtime JJ
I champion NN
O of IN
I these DT
I programs NNS
O in IN
I Congress NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O Republican NNP
O whip NN
O Newt NNP
O Gingrich NNP
O of IN
I Georgia NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
O distracted VBN
O by IN
I questions NNS
O about IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I ethics NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I conservatives NNS
O note VBP
O <period> <period>
I Other JJ
I conservative JJ
I champions NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O like IN
O Wyoming NNP
O Republican NNP
O Sen<period> NNP
I Malcolm NNP
I Wallop NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I longtime JJ
I SDI NNP
I advocate NN
O <comma> <comma>
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O have VB
I the DT
I clout NN
O with IN
I the DT
I Bush NNP
I White NNP
I House NNP
B that IN
B they PRP
O enjoyed VBD
O with IN
I President NNP
I Reagan NNP
O <period> <period>
O Above IN
I all DT
O <comma> <comma>
O though RB
O <comma> <comma>
I proponents NNS
O say VBP
I neither DT
I the DT
I Contra NNP
I nor CC
I the DT
I SDI NNP
I cause NN
O can MD
O be VB
O pushed VBN
O much JJ
O further JJ
O without IN
I more RBR
I presidential JJ
I support NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O For IN
I there EX
O to TO
O be VB
I wind NN
O in IN
I the DT
I sails NNS
O of IN
I any DT
I program NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I chief JJ
I executive NN
O has VBZ
O to TO
O be VB
O blowing VBG
O in IN
I the DT
I sails NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Rep<period> NNP
I Burton NNP
O <period> <period>
I All DT
I this DT
O causes NNS
I Rep<period> NNP
I Hyde NNP
O to TO
O muse VB
O about IN
I an DT
I alternate JJ
I way NN
O to TO
O drum VB
O up IN
I more JJR
I enthusiasm NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I What WP
B I PRP
O <apost>d MD
O like VB
O to TO
O see VB
O <comma> <comma>
O if IN
I he PRP
O is VBZ
O up IN
O to TO
I it PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
O for IN
I Reagan NNP
O to TO
O take VB
O to TO
I the DT
I hustings NN
O to TO
O regenerate VB
I enthusiasm NN
O for IN
I SDI NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I the DT
I congressman NN
O says NNS
O <period> <period>
I We PRP
O <apost>re VBP
O sorry JJ
O to TO
O report VB
O that IN
O on IN
I Monday NNP
B President NNP
I Bush NNP
O accepted VBD
I the DT
I resignation NN
O of IN
I William NNP
I Allen NNP
O as IN
I chairman NN
O of IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I Civil NNP
I Rights NNP
I Commission NNP
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Allen NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O appointed VBN
O by IN
I President NNP
I Reagan NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O grew VBD
O understandably RB
O tired VBN
O of IN
O dealing VBG
O with IN
I the DT
I guerrilla NN
I tactics NNS
O of IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I enemies NNS
O <period> <period>
I His PRP<dollar>
I recent JJ
I speech NN
O <comma> <comma>
O provocatively RB
O titled VBN
O <quote> <quote>
I Blacks NNS
O ? <period>
I Animals NNS
O ? <period>
I Homosexuals NNS
O ? <period>
I What WP
O is VBZ
I a DT
I Minority NNP
O ? <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O caused VBN
I an DT
I uproar NN
O when WRB
I its PRP<dollar>
I title NN
O leaked VBN
O out RB
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Allen NNP
B <apost>s POS
I commissioners NNS
O voted VBD
O to TO
O call VB
I his PRP<dollar>
I unread JJ
I speech NN
O <quote> <quote>
O thoughtless JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O disgusting JJ
O and CC
O unnecessarily RB
O inflammatory JJ
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Commissioner NNP
I Mary NNP
I Francis NNP
I Berry NNP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O was VBD
O <quote> <quote>
I another DT
I sad JJ
I episode NN
O in IN
I the DT
I saga NN
O of IN
I the DT
I unguided JJ
I missile NN
B who WP
O is VBZ
I chairman NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Rep<period> NNP
I Don NNP
I Edwards NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I California NNP
I Democrat NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O warned VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Allen NNP
O that IN
I the DT
I speech NN
O would MD
O be VB
O <quote> <quote>
O outside IN
I the DT
I scope NN
O of IN
I the DT
I commission NN
B <apost>s POS
I jurisdiction NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Thomas NNP
I Stoddard NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I head NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Lambda NNP
I Legal NNP
I Defense NNP
I Fund NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O called VBD
I the DT
I prospect NN
O of IN
I the DT
I speech NN
O <quote> <quote>
O frankly RB
O shocking JJ
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O <apost>ve VBP
O actually RB
O read VB
I the DT
I speech NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Allen NNP
O began VBD
I it PRP
O with IN
I a DT
I warning NN
O to TO
I his PRP<dollar>
I hosts NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I California NNP
I church NN
I group NN
B that WDT
O opposes VBZ
I rights NNS
O for IN
I homosexuals NNS
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O said VBD
O that IN
I other JJ
I participants NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I conference NN
O <quote> <quote>
O do VBP
O not RB
O believe VB
O that IN
I the DT
I rights NNS
O of IN
I Americans NNPS
O should MD
O be VB
O guaranteed VBN
O to TO
I citizens NNS
B who WP
O are VBP
O homosexual JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O but CC
O that IN
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O mean VBP
O to TO
O persuade VB
I you PRP
O to TO
I the DT
I opposite JJ
I view NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I He PRP
O recalled VBD
O to TO
I the DT
I audience NN
B a DT
I <quote> <quote>
I strange JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I infelicitous JJ
I <quote> <quote>
I analogy NN
B he PRP
O once RB
O heard VBD
O arguing VBG
O <quote> <quote>
O now RB
O that IN
I we PRP
O have VBP
O finally RB
O recognized VBN
O that IN
I American JJ
I blacks NNS
O have VBP
I rights NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I we PRP
O need VBP
O to TO
O do VB
I the DT
I same JJ
O for IN
I animals NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Allen NNP
O objected VBD
O to TO
I this DT
I analogy NN
O because IN
I it PRP
O seems VBZ
O to TO
O <quote> <quote>
O assimilate VB
I the DT
I status NN
O of IN
I blacks NNS
O to TO
I that IN
O of IN
I animals NNS
O -- =colon=
O as IN
I a DT
I mere JJ
I project NN
O of IN
I charity NN
O <comma> <comma>
O of IN
I humaneness NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Rights NNS
O on IN
I such JJ
I a DT
I basis NN
O <comma> <comma>
O whether IN
O for IN
I blacks NNS
I or CC
I homosexuals NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O are VBP
O <quote> <quote>
I mere JJ
I indulgences NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O said VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O subject NN
O to TO
O being VBG
O taken VBN
O back RB
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O says VBZ
I the DT
I title NN
O of IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I speech NN
O was VBD
O to TO
O make VB
I his PRP<dollar>
I point NN
O that IN
I Americans NNPS
O have VBP
I rights NNS
O as IN
I individuals NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O not RB
O as IN
I members NNS
O of IN
I certain JJ
I select VB
I groups NNS
O <period> <period>
I His PRP<dollar>
I speech NN
O criticized VBD
I the DT
I <quote> <quote>
I idiocy NN
O of IN
I notions NNS
O of IN
I protected VBN
I groups NNS
O in IN
I society NN
O <quote> <quote>
O as IN
O opposed VBN
O to TO
I individual JJ
I equality NN
O or CC
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
I he PRP
O put VBP
I it PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
O <quote> <quote>
I a DT
I common JJ
I destiny NN
O as IN
I Americans NNPS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Instead RB
O of IN
O lobbying VBG
O for IN
I special JJ
I treatment NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Allen NNP
O said VBD
O that IN
I homosexuals NNS
I and CC
I others NNS
O should MD
O try VB
O to TO
O ensure VB
I equal JJ
I treatment NN
O under IN
I the DT
I law NN
O and CC
O not RB
O aim VB
O for IN
I special JJ
I privileges NNS
B that WDT
O would MD
O risk VB
O <quote> <quote>
I invidious JJ
I retrenchment NN
O with IN
I government NN
I complicity NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I This DT
O hardly RB
O sounds VBZ
O like IN
I an DT
I anti-homosexual JJ
I screed NN
O <period> <period>
I What WP
O <apost>s VBZ
O really RB
O going VBG
O on IN
O here RB
O ? <period>
I The DT
I three CD
I most RBS
I important JJ
I things NNS
O to TO
O understand VB
O about IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Allen NNP
O is VBZ
O that IN
I he PRP
O is VBZ
I a DT
I black JJ
I conservative JJ
I intellectual JJ
O -- =colon=
I a DT
I triple JJ
I threat NN
O to TO
I the DT
I liberal JJ
I establishment NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Allen NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O teaches VBZ
I government NN
O at IN
I prestigious JJ
I Harvey NNP
I Mudd NNP
I College NNP
O in IN
I California NNP
O and CC
O will MD
O remain VB
I a DT
I member NN
O of IN
I the DT
I commission NN
O <comma> <comma>
O has VBZ
O spent VBN
I years NNS
O arguing VBG
O that IN
I civil JJ
I rights NNS
O are VBP
I individuals NNS
B <apost> POS
I rights NNS
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O last RB
O made VBN
I waves NNS
O when WRB
I he PRP
O dared VBD
O to TO
O defend VB
I an DT
I Indian NNP
I girl NN
B who WP
O had VBD
O been VBN
O adopted VBN
O by IN
I non-Indian JJ
I parents NNS
O off IN
I her PRP<dollar>
I reservation NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Allen NNP
O quickly RB
O ran VBD
O up IN
O against IN
I the DT
I liberal JJ
I establishment NN
O again RB
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O somehow RB
O elevated VBN
I the DT
I vague JJ
I concept NN
O of IN
O <quote> <quote>
I Indian NNP
I rights NNS
O <quote> <quote>
O above IN
I the DT
I rights NNS
O of IN
I individual JJ
I Indians NNPS
O <period> <period>
I There EX
O is VBZ
I a DT
I huge JJ
I divide NN
O between IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Allen NNP
B <apost>s POS
I we<apost>re-all-in-this-together JJ
I view NN
O and CC
I the DT
I divisive JJ
I litigation NN
I approach NN
O of IN
I the DT
I civil JJ
I rights NNS
I groups NNS
O <period> <period>
O Indeed RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I gap NN
O is VBZ
O so RB
O large JJ
O that IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Allen NNP
B <apost>s POS
I critics NNS
O refuse VBP
O to TO
O engage VB
I the DT
I debate NN
O <period> <period>
I Their PRP<dollar>
I ridicule NN
O of IN
I him PRP
O is VBZ
I no DT
I substitute NN
O for IN
I argument NN
O <period> <period>
I Their PRP<dollar>
I effort NN
O to TO
O run VB
I him PRP
O out IN
O of IN
I Washington NNP
O is VBZ
I an DT
I embarrassment NN
O to TO
I the DT
I original JJ
I purpose NN
O of IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I own JJ
I movement NN
O <period> <period>
I We PRP
O hope VBP
I the DT
I next JJ
I head NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Civil NNP
I Rights NNP
I Commission NNP
O will MD
O be VB
O as RB
O brave JJ
O as IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Allen NNP
O in IN
O making VBG
I the DT
I case NN
O for IN
I equality NN
O of IN
I civil JJ
I rights NNS
O <period> <period>
I Bearings NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O said VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I chairman NN
O <comma> <comma>
I John NNP
I R<period> NNP
I Cunin NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O will MD
O retire VB
O as IN
I an DT
I officer NN
O of IN
I the DT
I company NN
O on IN
I Jan<period> NNP
I 2 CD
O <period> <period>
I George NNP
I L<period> NNP
I LaMore NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I president NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I executive JJ
I officer NN
O <comma> <comma>
O will MD
O become VB
I chairman NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I executive NN
O upon IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Cunin NNP
B <apost>s POS
I retirement NN
O <period> <period>
I John NNP
I C<period> NNP
I Dannemiller NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I executive JJ
I vice NN
I president NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I operating VBG
I officer NN
O <comma> <comma>
O will MD
O become VB
I president NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I operating VBG
I officer NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Cunin NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 65 CD
I years NNS
O old JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
I chief JJ
I executive NN
O of IN
I the DT
I distributor NN
O of IN
I bearings NNS
O and CC
I power-transmission JJ
I products NNS
O from IN
I 1982 CD
O to TO
I 1988 CD
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O will MD
O continue VB
O as IN
I a DT
I director NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I LaMore NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 63 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I 48-year JJ
I veteran NN
O at IN
I Bearings NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O has VBZ
O been VBN
I president NN
O since IN
I 1983 CD
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Dannemiller NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 51 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O joined VBD
I Bearings NNP
O in IN
I August NNP
I 1988 CD
O from IN
I Leaseway NNP
I Transportation NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O where WRB
I he PRP
O was VBD
I president NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I operating VBG
I officer NN
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O has VBZ
O been VBN
I a DT
I Bearings NNP
I director NN
O since IN
I 1985 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I appointments NNS
O are VBP
I part NN
O of IN
I a DT
I planned VBN
I succession NN
O at IN
I the DT
I company NN
O <period> <period>
I Soviet JJ
I leader NN
I Mikhail NNP
I Gorbachev NNP
O opened VBD
I a DT
I major JJ
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I trade NN
I exhibition NN
O in IN
I Moscow NNP
O and CC
O spent VBD
I two CD
I hours NNS
O touring VBG
I some DT
O of IN
I the DT
I 150 CD
I stalls NNS
O representing VBG
I such JJ
I blue-chip JJ
I companies NNS
O as IN
I General NNP
I Motors NNPS
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I International NNP
I Business NNP
I Machines NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O and CC
I Johnson NNP
I <amp> CC
I Johnson NNP
O <period> <period>
O At IN
I the DT
I Archer-Daniels-Midland NNP
I Co<period> NNP
I stand VB
O <comma> <comma>
I Mrs<period> NNP
I Nelson NNP
I Rockefeller NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I board NN
I member NN
O <comma> <comma>
O offered VBD
I him PRP
B a DT
I soy NN
I burger NN
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O did VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O bite VB
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I exhibition NN
O by IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period>-U<period>S<period>S<period>R<period> NNP
I Trade NNP
I and CC
I Economic NNP
I Council NNP
O underscores VBZ
I the DT
I growing VBG
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I interest NN
O in IN
I that DT
I nation NN
B <apost>s POS
I market NN
O <comma> <comma>
O though IN
I trade NN
O between IN
I the DT
I two CD
I countries NNS
O is VBZ
I a DT
I minuscule JJ
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 3 CD
I billion CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Soviet JJ
I president NN
O and CC
I his PRP<dollar>
I prime JJ
I minister NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Nikolai NNP
I Ryzhkov NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O spent VBD
I the DT
I longest JJS
I time NN
O <comma> <comma>
I about IN
I 15 CD
I minutes NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O at IN
I the DT
I IBM NNP
I stand NN
O <comma> <comma>
O where WRB
I they PRP
O got VBD
I souvenir NN
I computer-chip NN
I key JJ
I rings NNS
O <period> <period>
O At IN
I the DT
I GM NNP
I stall NN
O <comma> <comma>
I they PRP
O barely RB
O looked VBD
O at IN
I a DT
I gleaming VBG
I Cadillac NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O preferring VBG
O to TO
O talk VB
O about IN
I cooperation NN
I possibilities NNS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I Beijing NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O meantime NN
O <comma> <comma>
I China NNP
O opened VBD
I an DT
I international JJ
I aviation NN
I show NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I the DT
I West NNP
B <apost>s POS
I embargo NN
O on IN
I military JJ
I deals NNS
O and CC
I uncertainty NN
O about IN
I the DT
I nation NN
B <apost>s POS
I stability NN
O kept VBD
I many JJ
I foreign JJ
I exhibitors NNS
O away RB
O <period> <period>
I Officials NNS
O said VBD
I 91 CD
I companies NNS
O from IN
I 14 CD
I countries NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O including VBG
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O had VBD
I displays NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O down RB
O from IN
I about IN
I 260 CD
I firms NNS
O from IN
I more JJR
I than IN
I 20 CD
I countries NNS
O at IN
I the DT
I last JJ
I show NN
I in IN
I Japanese JJ
I air-conditioner NN
I maker NN
I Daikin NNP
I Industries NNP
I Ltd<period> NNP
O was VBD
O fined VBN
I two CD
I million CD
I yen NN
O <lparen> <lparen>
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 14<comma>000 CD
O <rparen> <rparen>
O for IN
O exporting VBG
O to TO
I the DT
I Soviet NNP
I Union NNP
B a DT
I chemical NN
I solution NN
B that WDT
O could MD
O be VB
O used VBN
O in IN
I missile-guidance JJ
I systems NNS
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I Daikin NNP
I executive NN
O in IN
I charge NN
O of IN
I exports NNS
O when WRB
I the DT
I high-purity NN
I halogenated VBD
I hydrocarbon NN
O was VBD
O sold VBN
O to TO
I the DT
I Soviets NNPS
O in IN
I 1986 CD
O received VBD
I a DT
I suspended VBN
I 10-month JJ
I jail NN
I sentence NN
O <period> <period>
I Judge NNP
I Masaaki NNP
I Yoneyama NNP
O told VBD
I the DT
I Osaka NNP
I District NNP
I Court NNP
B Daikin NNP
B <apost>s POS
I <quote> <quote>
I responsibility NN
O is VBZ
O heavy JJ
O because IN
I illegal JJ
I exports NNS
O lowered VBD
I international JJ
I trust NN
O in IN
I Japan NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Sale NNP
O of IN
I the DT
I solution NN
O in IN
I concentrated VBN
I form NN
O to TO
I Communist NNP
I countries NNS
O is VBZ
O prohibited VBN
O by IN
I Japanese JJ
I law NN
O and CC
O by IN
I international JJ
I agreement NN
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I Soviet JJ
I legislative JJ
I panel NN
O rejected VBD
O as IN
O not RB
O radical JJ
O enough RB
I a DT
I government NN
I proposal NN
O on IN
O decentralizing VBG
I economic JJ
I control NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I newspaper NN
I Leninskoye NNP
I Zamya NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I committee NN
O decided VBD
I the DT
I plan NN
O to TO
O parcel VB
O out RP
I economic JJ
I powers NNS
O previously RB
O exercised VBN
O by IN
I Moscow NNP
O to TO
I the DT
I country NN
B <apost>s POS
I 15 CD
I republics NNS
O <quote> <quote>
O does VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O reflect VB
I the DT
I radical JJ
I changes NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I Soviet JJ
I federation NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I committee NN
O gave VBD
I the DT
I government NN
O until IN
I Nov<period> NNP
I 15 CD
O to TO
O revise VB
I the DT
I proposal NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I move NN
O reflected VBD
I the DT
I growing VBG
I confidence NN
O of IN
I the DT
I revamped VBN
I Supreme NNP
I Soviet JJ
O <period> <period>
I Scott NNP
I Paper NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O abandoning VBG
I a DT
I proposed VBN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 650 CD
I million CD
I tree-farming JJ
I project NN
O in IN
I Indonesia NNP
O because IN
I it PRP
O no RB
O longer RB
O expects VBZ
O to TO
O use VB
I as IN
I much JJ
I eucalyptus NN
I pulp NN
O as IN
O previously RB
O anticipated VBN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I eucalyptus NN
I plantation NN
I and CC
I pulp NN
I mill NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O would MD
O have VB
O covered VBN
I about IN
I 175<comma>000 CD
I acres NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I Irian NNP
I Jaya NNP
I region NN
O <comma> <comma>
O had VBD
O been VBN
O approved VBN
O by IN
I Indonesia NNP
B <apost>s POS
I investment NN
I board NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I it PRP
O was VBD
O opposed VBN
O by IN
I some DT
I environmentalists NNS
O as IN
I a DT
I threat NN
O to TO
I Irian NNP
I Jaya NNP
B <apost>s POS
I forests NNS
O and CC
I a DT
I potential JJ
I source NN
O of IN
I social JJ
I unrest NN
O for IN
I the DT
I primitive JJ
I tribes NNS
B who WP
O inhabit VBP
I them PRP
O <period> <period>
I Yaohan NNP
I Departmentstore NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O of IN
I Japan NNP
O is VBZ
O moving VBG
I its PRP<dollar>
I international-operations NNS
I headquarters NN
O and CC
I holding VBG
I company NN
O to TO
I Hong NNP
I Kong NNP
O to TO
O gain VB
O from IN
I the DT
I British JJ
I colony NN
B <apost>s POS
I economic JJ
I advantages NNS
I and CC
I tax NN
I structure NN
O <period> <period>
O With IN
I funds NNS
O of IN
I 5<period>56 CD
I billion CD
I Hong NNP
I Kong NNP
I dollars NNS
O <lparen> <lparen>
I US<dollar> <dollar>
I 712 CD
I million CD
O <rparen> <rparen>
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I new JJ
I company NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Yaohan NNP
I International NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O plans VBZ
O to TO
O acquire VB
I 10 CD
O of IN
I Hong NNP
I Kong NNP
B <apost>s POS
I top JJ
I restaurants NNS
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O also RB
O intends VBZ
O to TO
O set VB
O up IN
I an DT
I international JJ
I wholesale JJ
I market NN
O with IN
I the DT
I Singapore NNP
I government NN
B next JJ
I May NNP
O and CC
O to TO
O open VB
I a DT
I department NN
I store NN
O in IN
I Bangkok NNP
O and CC
I shopping NN
I centers NNS
O in IN
I Malaysia NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Taiwan NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Canada NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Chicago NNP
I and CC
I Seattle NNP
O by IN
I December NNP
I 1990 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I chain NN
O currently RB
O has VBZ
I 90 CD
I retail JJ
I outlets NNS
O in IN
I Japan NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I seven CD
O in IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I three CD
O in IN
I Hong NNP
I Kong NNP
O and CC
I a DT
I dozen NN
O more RBR
O scattered VBN
O around IN
I the DT
I globe NN
O <period> <period>
I Major NNP
I European JJ
I auction NN
I houses NNS
O are VBP
O turning VBG
O increasingly RB
O to TO
I specialized JJ
I sales NNS
O <period> <period>
I Christie NNP
B <apost>s POS
O will MD
O soon RB
O have VB
I a DT
I sale NN
O of IN
I Dada NNP
I and CC
I Symbolist NNP
I art NN
O while IN
I Sotheby NNP
B <apost>s POS
O is VBZ
O luring VBG
I collectors NNS
O with IN
I sales NNS
O of IN
I Swiss JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I German JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I Spanish JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I Australian JJ
I and CC
I Canadian JJ
I paintings NNS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I Brussels NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Hotel NNP
I de FW
I Ventes NNP
I Horta NNP
O auctioned VBD
I pistols NNS
I and CC
I sabers NNS
O - =colon=
O along IN
O with IN
I paintings NNS
I and CC
I jewels NNS
O <period> <period>
I Berlin NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Villa NNP
I Grisebach NNP
O will MD
O auction VB
I art NN
I works NNS
O with IN
I pre-sale JJ
I estimates NNS
O of IN
I less JJR
I than IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<comma>600 CD
O on IN
I Nov<period> NNP
I 25 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I auction NN
I house NN
O <comma> <comma>
O known VBN
O for IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I sales NNS
O of IN
I top-drawer NN
I 19th JJ
I and CC
I 20th JJ
I century NN
I works NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
O providing VBG
O <quote> <quote>
I a DT
I service NN
O to TO
I clients NNS
B who WP
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O want VB
O to TO
O sell VB
I just RB
I their PRP<dollar>
I fabulous JJ
I oil NN
I paintings NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Villa NNP
I Grisebach NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Vivien NNP
I Reuter NNP
O <period> <period>
I Antwerp NNP
I auctioneer NN
I Campo NNP
O is VBZ
O less RBR
O concerned VBN
O with IN
I market NN
I niches NNS
O than IN
O with IN
I Belgium NNP
B <apost>s POS
I crushing VBG
I tax NN
I and CC
I auction-fee JJ
I burden NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Everything NN
O has VBZ
O to TO
O be VB
I the DT
I same JJ
O between IN
I countries NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Campo NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Stefan NNP
I Campo NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O is VBZ
O asking VBG
I clients NNS
O to TO
O sign VB
I protest NN
I petitions NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Then RB
I there EX
O <apost>ll MD
O be VB
I fair JJ
I competition NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Ending VBG
I tax-free JJ
I shopping NN
O in IN
I the DT
I European NNP
I Community NNP
O after IN
I 1992 CD
O could MD
O threaten VB
I more JJR
I than IN
I 3<comma>000 CD
I jobs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I International NNP
I Duty NNP
I Free NNP
I Confederation NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O Instead RB
O of IN
O banning VBG
I such JJ
I shopping NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I confederation NN
O proposed VBN
O amending VBG
I controls NNS
O to TO
O be VB
O sure JJ
I the DT
I privilege NN
O is VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O abused VBN
O <period><period><period> =colon=
O <period> <period>
I British JJ
I and CC
I Argentine JJ
I diplomats NNS
O opened VBD
I talks NNS
O in IN
I Madrid NNP
O aimed VBD
O at IN
O restoring VBG
I ties NNS
O severed VBN
O because IN
O of IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I 1982 CD
I war NN
O over IN
I the DT
I Falkland NNP
I Islands NNPS
O <period> <period>
I Britain NNP
B <apost>s POS
I U<period>N<period> NNP
I representative NN
I and CC
I delegation NN
I head NN
I Crispin NNP
I Tickell NNP
O called VBD
I the DT
I first JJ
I meeting NN
O <quote> <quote>
O good JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O interesting JJ
O and CC
O businesslike JJ
O <period> <period>
I Polaroid NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O benefiting VBG
O from IN
I staff-reduction NN
I savings NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O reported VBD
I a DT
I strong JJ
I gain NN
O in IN
I third-quarter JJ
I operating NN
I results NNS
O and CC
I net JJ
I income NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 29<period>9 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 40 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O after IN
I preferred-stock JJ
I requirements NNS
O <period> <period>
I Analysts NNS
O said VBD
I the DT
I numbers NNS
O were VBD
O better JJR
O than IN
I expectations NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O partly RB
O because IN
O of IN
I strong JJ
I profit NN
I margins NNS
O and CC
I a DT
I positive JJ
I foreign-currency NN
I translation NN
O <period> <period>
O However RB
O <comma> <comma>
I they PRP
O said VBD
I the DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I flat JJ
I revenue NN
O was VBD
I a DT
I disappointment NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I an DT
I indication NN
O that IN
I sales NNS
O of IN
I Polaroid NNP
B <apost>s POS
I new JJ
I conventional JJ
I film NN
O in IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O have VBP
O been VBN
O sluggish JJ
O <period> <period>
I Revenue NN
O in IN
I the DT
I third JJ
I quarter NN
O was VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 437<period>7 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O almost RB
O unchanged JJ
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 436<period>3 CD
I million CD
B a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
I Polaroid NNP
O reported VBD
I operating VBG
I profit NN
O before IN
I taxes NNS
O and CC
I interest NN
I costs NNS
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 63<period>1 CD
I million CD
O for IN
I the DT
I third JJ
I quarter NN
O <comma> <comma>
I more JJR
I than IN
I double VB
I the DT
I year-before JJ
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 24 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I Charges NNS
O for IN
I staff NN
I cuts NNS
O and CC
I other JJ
I restructuring NN
O produced VBD
I a DT
I net JJ
I loss NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 54<period>1 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 77 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I 1988 CD
B <apost>s POS
I third JJ
I quarter NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O <apost>m VBP
O somewhat RB
O skeptical JJ
O about IN
I the DT
I underlying VBG
I demand NN
I <quote> <quote>
O for IN
I Polaroid NNP
I products NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I Michael NNP
I Ellmann NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I analyst NN
O with IN
I Wertheim NNP
I Schroder NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O If IN
I you PRP
O believe VBP
O that IN
I a DT
I good JJ
I performance NN
B next JJ
I year NN
O is VBZ
O contingent JJ
O on IN
I an DT
I acceleration NN
O of IN
I revenue NN
O <comma> <comma>
I there EX
O is VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
I a DT
I lot NN
O here RB
O to TO
O base VB
I optimism NN
O on IN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Alex NNP
I Henderson NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I analyst NN
O with IN
I Prudential-Bache NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O says VBZ
I Polaroid NNP
I officials NNS
O told VBN
I him PRP
B yesterday NN
O that IN
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I sales NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I new JJ
I conventional JJ
I film NN
I product NN
O <comma> <comma>
O introduced VBN
O in IN
I the DT
I second JJ
I quarter NN
O <comma> <comma>
O have VBP
O been VBN
O <quote> <quote>
O disappointing JJ
O <quote> <quote>
O after IN
I a DT
I promising JJ
I start NN
O <period> <period>
I Sam NNP
I Yanes NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Polaroid NNP
I spokesman NN
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O know VB
O about IN
O disappointing JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O but CC
O added VBD
O that IN
I the DT
I company NN
O has VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O been VBN
O able JJ
O to TO
O get VB
I the DT
I product NN
O on IN
I the DT
I shelves NNS
O of IN
I some DT
I mass-merchandise NN
I <comma> <comma>
I discount NN
I retailers NNS
B that IN
B it PRP
O had VBD
O hoped VBN
O would MD
O be VB
O carrying VBG
I the DT
I product NN
O already RB
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Yanes NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I film NN
O <comma> <comma>
I One CD
I Film NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
O currently RB
O carried VBN
O at IN
I about IN
I 15<comma>000 CD
I retail JJ
I outlets NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O including VBG
I drugstores NNS
I and CC
I supermarkets NNS
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I the DT
I nine CD
I months NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Polaroid NNP
O reported VBD
I earnings NNS
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 98<period>5 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>27 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <period> <period>
I Last JJ
I year NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I company NN
O had VBD
I a DT
I nine-month JJ
I loss NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 15<period>1 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 23 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I New NNP
I York NNP
I Stock NNP
I Exchange NNP
I composite JJ
I trading NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Polaroid NNP
O closed VBD
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 47 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O up IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>125 CD
O <period> <period>
O Why WRB
O is VBZ
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O suddenly RB
O so RB
O volatile JJ
O ? <period>
I Yesterday NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Dow NNP
I Jones NNP
I Industrial NNP
I Average NNP
O did VBD
I a DT
I now RB
I familiar JJ
I dance NN
O =colon= =colon=
I It PRP
O plunged VBD
I 60<period>25 CD
I points NNS
O before IN
I lunch NN
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I most RBS
O of IN
I the DT
I drop NN
O occurring VBG
O in IN
I 25 CD
I minutes NNS
O <period> <period>
O Then RB
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O rebounded VBD
O to TO
O finish VB
O down RB
I only RB
I 18<period>65 CD
I points NNS
O <period> <period>
O And CC
I those DT
I swings NNS
O paled VBD
O beside IN
I Friday NNP
B <apost>s POS
I 190<period>58-point JJ
I plunge NN
O and CC
I Monday NNP
B <apost>s POS
I 88<period>12-point JJ
I recovery NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I It PRP
O <apost>s VBZ
I madness NN
O -- =colon=
O that IN
O in IN
I an DT
I hour NN
B you PRP
O can MD
O whack VB
O off IN
I so RB
I much JJ
I value NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Stanford NNP
I Calderwood NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I chairman NN
O of IN
I Trinity NNP
I Investment NNP
I Management NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Boston NNP
O <period> <period>
O And CC
O <comma> <comma>
O apparently RB
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O here RB
O to TO
O stay VB
O <period> <period>
I Richard NNP
I Bernstein NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I senior JJ
I quantitative JJ
I analyst NN
O at IN
I Merrill NNP
I Lynch NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O says VBZ
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I My PRP<dollar>
I gut NN
I feel NN
O is VBZ
O that IN
I we PRP
O <apost>ll MD
O live VB
O with IN
I those DT
I swings NNS
O for IN
I a DT
I while NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I There EX
O are VBP
I many JJ
I reasons NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I market NN
B <apost>s POS
I jumpiness NN
O =colon= =colon=
I new JJ
I trading NN
I vehicles NNS
O such JJ
O as IN
I stock-index NN
I futures NNS
O and CC
I options NNS
O <colon> =colon=
I computer-driven JJ
I strategies NNS
O like IN
I program NN
I trading NN
O <colon> =colon=
O and CC
I crowd NN
I psychology NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I most RBS
O are VBP
O linked VBN
O by IN
I a DT
I single JJ
I theme NN
O =colon= =colon=
I liquidity NN
O -- =colon=
I the DT
I ability NN
O to TO
O get VB
O in IN
O and CC
O out IN
O of IN
I the DT
I market NN
O quickly RB
O <period> <period>
I Prices NNS
O are VBP
O moving VBG
O up IN
O and CC
O down RB
O so RB
O fast RB
O because IN
I investors NNS
O are VBP
O employing VBG
I ways NNS
O to TO
O turn VB
O over IN
I shares NNS
O at IN
I ever-faster JJ
I rates NNS
O and CC
O increasingly RB
O acting VBG
O in IN
I concert NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Institutions NNS
O are VBP
O herding VBG
I animals NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Peter NNP
I Anderson NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O heads VBZ
I the DT
I pension-fund NN
I management NN
I arm NN
O of IN
I IDS NNP
I Financial NNP
I Services NNP
I Inc NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O watch VBP
I the DT
I same JJ
I indicators NNS
O and CC
O listen VB
O to TO
I the DT
I same JJ
I prognosticators NNS
O <period> <period>
O Like IN
I lemmings NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I we PRP
O tend VBP
O to TO
O move VB
O in IN
I the DT
I same JJ
I direction NN
O at IN
I same JJ
I time NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O And CC
I that IN
O <comma> <comma>
O naturally RB
O <comma> <comma>
O exacerbates VBZ
I price NN
I movements NNS
O <period> <period>
I Institutions NNS
O -- =colon=
I who WP
O now JJ
O account NN
O for IN
I most RBS
I trading NN
O -- =colon=
O count NN
O on IN
O being VBG
O able JJ
O to TO
I buy VB
I and CC
I sell VB
B big JJ
I blocks NNS
O of IN
I stock NN
O at IN
I an DT
I eye-blink NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
O when WRB
I they PRP
O discover VBP
O that IN
I markets NNS
O are VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O always RB
O as RB
O liquid JJ
O as IN
I they PRP
O supposed VBD
O -- =colon=
I markets NNS
O jump VBP
O <period> <period>
O On IN
I Monday NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O for IN
I instance NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Howard NNP
I Ward NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I principal NN
O at IN
I Scudder NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Stevens NNP
I <amp> CC
I Clark NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O found VBD
O that IN
O <quote> <quote>
I you PRP
O could MD
O n<apost>t RB
O buy VB
I blue-chips NNS
O at IN
I quoted VBN
I prices NNS
O without IN
O paying VBG
O up IN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O And CC
O when WRB
I many JJ
I firms NNS
O had VBD
O to TO
O <quote> <quote>
O pay VB
O up IN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Monday NNP
B <apost>s POS
I sudden JJ
I rally NN
O was VBD
O sparked VBN
O <period> <period>
I Trading NN
O in IN
I futures NNS
I and CC
I options NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I some DT
I people NNS
O believe VBP
O <comma> <comma>
O can MD
O add VB
O to TO
I volatility NN
O <period> <period>
I Investors NNS
O believe VBP
I they PRP
O can MD
O can MD
O rely VB
O on IN
I such JJ
I derivative JJ
I securities NNS
O to TO
O get VB
O in IN
O and CC
O out IN
O of IN
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O without IN
O actually RB
O selling VBG
I any DT
I stocks NNS
O <colon> =colon=
I that DT
O is VBZ
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I way NN
O of IN
O staying VBG
O liquid JJ
O even RB
O when WRB
I they PRP
O own JJ
I stocks NNS
O <period> <period>
I These DT
I and CC
I other JJ
I modern JJ
I trading NN
I methods NNS
O <quote> <quote>
O tend VBP
O to TO
O promote VB
I dramatic JJ
I shifts NNS
O in IN
I assets NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I George NNP
I Douglas NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I first JJ
I vice NN
I president NN
O at IN
I Drexel NNP
I Burnham NNP
I Lambert NNP
I Inc NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I It PRP
O <apost>s VBZ
I the DT
I idea NN
O that IN
I what WP
O goes VBZ
O in IN
O easy JJ
O can MD
O come VB
O out IN
O easy JJ
O <quote> <quote>
O -- =colon=
O so RB
O that IN
I bouts NNS
O of IN
I higher JJR
I volatility NN
O get VB
O built VBN
O into IN
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O <period> <period>
I One CD
I new JJ
I investment NN
I style NN
O called VBN
O <quote> <quote>
I asset NN
I allocation NN
O <quote> <quote>
O shifts NNS
I portfolio NN
I weightings NNS
O between IN
I stocks NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I bonds NNS
O and CC
I cash NN
O when WRB
I computer NN
I models NNS
O say VBP
I one CD
O is VBZ
O more RBR
O attractive JJ
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I instance NN
O <comma> <comma>
I First NNP
I Quadrant NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I asset NN
I allocator NN
O based VBN
O in IN
I Morristown NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I N<period>J<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I it PRP
O quickly RB
O boosted VBD
I stock NN
I positions NNS
O in IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I <quote> <quote>
I aggressive JJ
I <quote> <quote>
I accounts NNS
O to TO
I 75 CD
I <percent> NN
O from IN
I 55 NN
I <percent> NN
O to TO
O take VB
I advantage NN
O of IN
I plunging VBG
I prices NNS
B Friday NNP
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O added VBD
I another DT
I 5 NN
I <percent> NN
B Monday NNP
O before IN
I stocks NNS
O rallied VBD
O <period> <period>
O When WRB
I they PRP
O did VBD
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I firm NN
O reduced VBD
I those DT
I stock NN
I holdings NNS
O to TO
I about IN
I 70 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I classic JJ
I example NN
O of IN
I institutions NNS
B <apost> POS
I hunger NN
O for IN
I liquidity NN
O is VBZ
I portfolio NN
I insurance NN
O <comma> <comma>
O now RB
O widely RB
O discredited VBN
O <period> <period>
O Before IN
I the DT
I 1987 CD
I crash NN
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I estimated VBN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 60 CD
I billion CD
O in IN
I institutional JJ
I money NN
O was VBD
O managed VBN
O under IN
I this DT
I hedging VBG
I technique NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I idea NN
O was VBD
O to TO
O <quote> <quote>
O insure VB
O <quote> <quote>
I the DT
I value NN
O of IN
I a DT
I portfolio NN
O by IN
O selling VBG
I futures NNS
O when WRB
I stock NN
I prices NNS
O dropped VBD
O -- =colon=
O eliminating VBG
I the DT
I need NN
O to TO
O sell VB
I the DT
I stocks NNS
I themselves PRP
O <period> <period>
O But CC
O in IN
I October NNP
I 1987 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O when WRB
I portfolio NN
I insurers NNS
O rushed VBD
O to TO
O sell VB
O at IN
I the DT
I same JJ
I time NN
O <comma> <comma>
I they PRP
O overwhelmed VBD
I both DT
I the DT
I stock NN
I and CC
I futures NNS
I markets NNS
O <period> <period>
O Yet RB
O even JJ
O today NN
O <comma> <comma>
I institutions NNS
O are VBP
O quietly RB
O practicing VBG
I forms NNS
O of IN
I portfolio NN
I insurance NN
O by IN
O nervously RB
O rushing VBG
O to TO
O and CC
O fro RB
O in IN
I the DT
I markets NNS
O <period> <period>
I Others NNS
O are VBP
O doing VBG
O <quote> <quote>
I index NN
I arbitrage NN
O <quote> <quote>
I a DT
I strategy NN
O of IN
O taking VBG
I advantage NN
O of IN
I price NN
I discrepancies NNS
O between IN
I stocks NNS
O and CC
I futures NNS
O <period> <period>
O Unlike IN
I traditional JJ
I buy-and-hold JJ
I strategies NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I all DT
O of IN
I the DT
I above IN
O require VB
O that IN
I market NN
I makers NNS
O be VBP
O on IN
I hand NN
O to TO
O provide VB
I liquidity NN
O by IN
O buying VBG
O and CC
O selling VBG
I stocks NNS
O in IN
I a DT
I crunch NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I institutions NNS
O say VBP
I Wall NNP
I Street NNP
I brokerage NN
I firms NNS
O are VBP
O less RBR
O willing JJ
O to TO
O make VB
I markets NNS
O <period> <period>
I Brokers NNS
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O deny VB
I that DT
O <period> <period>
I Wall NNP
I Street NNP
I traders NNS
O say VBP
O that IN
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I institutional JJ
I brokerage NN
I commissions NNS
O far RB
O lower JJR
O than IN
O in IN
I the DT
I 1970s NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I securities NNS
I firms NNS
O ca MD
O n<apost>t RB
O afford VB
O to TO
O take VB
I the DT
I risk NN
O of IN
O buying VBG
I too RB
I much JJ
I stock NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O think VBP
I everyone NN
O <apost>s VBZ
O a DT
O little RB
O more RBR
O leery JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Jack NNP
I Baker NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I head NN
O of IN
I equity NN
I trading NN
O at IN
I Shearon NNP
I Lehman NNP
I Hutton NNP
I Inc NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I institutions NNS
O have VBP
O driven VBN
I <lparen> <lparen>
I commission NN
I <rparen> <rparen>
I rates NNS
O down RB
O to TO
I the DT
I point NN
O where WRB
I it PRP
O makes VBZ
I no DT
I sense NN
O to TO
O commit VB
I capital NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I Tom NNP
I Gallagher NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I senior JJ
I executive JJ
I vice NN
I president NN
O in IN
I charge NN
O of IN
I institutional JJ
I trading NN
O at IN
I Oppenheimer NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Why WRB
O should MD
I I PRP
O risk VB
I money NN
O for IN
I a DT
I guy NN
O for IN
I who WP
O <apost>s VBZ
O paying VBG
I me PRP
B five CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I dance NN
O ? <period>
I All DT
B you PRP
O get VBP
O is VBZ
I risk NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Lack NN
O of IN
I liquidity NN
O can MD
O also RB
O result VB
O from IN
I exchange NN
I <quote> <quote>
I reforms NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Many JJ
I traders NNS
O say VBP
O that IN
O <quote> <quote>
I circuit NN
I breakers NNS
O <quote> <quote>
O put VB
O in IN
I place NN
O to TO
O damp VB
I volatility NN
O after IN
I the DT
I 1987 CD
I crash NN
O actually RB
O added VBD
O to TO
I volatility NN
O when WRB
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O plunged VBD
I Friday NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I circuit NN
I breakers NNS
O caused VBD
I a DT
I 30-minute JJ
I shutdown NN
O in IN
I trading NN
O in IN
I Standard NNP
I <amp> CC
I Poor NNP
B <apost>s POS
I 500-stock JJ
I index NN
I futures NNS
I contract VBP
O as IN
I the DT
I markets NNS
O were VBD
O falling VBG
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O With IN
I the DT
I futures-trading JJ
I halt NN
O <comma> <comma>
I you PRP
O could MD
O only RB
O sell VB
I stocks NNS
O <quote> <quote>
O to TO
O cut VB
I exposure NN
O to TO
I the DT
I market NN
O <comma> <comma>
O says VBZ
I a DT
I money NN
I manager NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I It PRP
O was VBD
O scary JJ
O to TO
I people NNS
O thinking VBG
O that IN
I they PRP
O could MD
O n<apost>t RB
O get VB
I their PRP<dollar>
I trades NNS
O off IN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O <quote> <quote>
I It PRP
O was VBD
O like IN
I they PRP
O put VBP
I you PRP
O in IN
I a DT
I room NN
O with IN
I a DT
I gorilla NN
O and CC
O told VBD
I you PRP
B there EX
O were VBD
I three CD
I doors NNS
O to TO
O exit VB
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I one CD
I Chicago-based JJ
I futures NNS
I trader NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Then RB
I they PRP
O said VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O By IN
I the DT
I way NN
O <comma> <comma>
I two CD
O of IN
I the DT
I doors NNS
O are VBP
O locked VBN
O <period> <period>
O <apost> <quote>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I takeover NN
I mania NN
O also RB
O adds VBZ
O to TO
I volatility NN
O <period> <period>
I UAL NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O is VBZ
I a DT
I good JJ
I example NN
O <period> <period>
O Valued VBN
O as IN
I a DT
I buy-out NN
I target NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I airline NN
I stock NN
O was VBD
O trading VBG
O at IN
I nearly RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 280 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <period> <period>
O When WRB
I the DT
I deal NN
O ran VBD
O into IN
I trouble NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I stock NN
O tumbled VBD
O <colon> =colon=
I it PRP
O closed VBD
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 198 CD
B yesterday NN
O <period> <period>
O Presumably RB
O <comma> <comma>
I UAL NNP
O is VBZ
O now JJ
O trading NN
O closer JJR
O to TO
I its PRP<dollar>
I value NN
O based VBN
O on IN
I earnings NNS
O <period> <period>
O By IN
I contrast NN
O <comma> <comma>
I traditional JJ
I buy-and-hold JJ
I investors NNS
O are VBP
O unlikely JJ
O to TO
O generate VB
I sudden JJ
I price NN
I moves NNS
O <period> <period>
I Scott NNP
I Black NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I value-oriented JJ
I money NN
I manager NN
B who WP
O heads VBZ
I Delphi NNP
I Management NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O points VBZ
O out RP
O that IN
O for IN
I those DT
B who WP
O invest VBP
O on IN
I fundamentals NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I the DT
I value NN
O of IN
I a DT
I stock NN
O from IN
I day NN
O to TO
I day NN
O does VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O change VB
O all DT
O that NN
O much NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Some DT
I experts NNS
O say VBP
I markets NNS
O are VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O as RB
O volatile JJ
O as IN
O widely RB
O assumed VBN
O <period> <period>
I Hans NNP
I Stoll NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I finance NN
I professor NN
O at IN
I Vanderbilt NNP
I University NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O says VBZ
I the DT
I current JJ
I volatility NN
O in IN
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I markets NNS
O pales VBZ
O in IN
I comparison NN
O to TO
I the DT
I 1930s CD
O <comma> <comma>
I decades NNS
O before IN
I derivative JJ
I instruments NNS
O such JJ
O as IN
I options NNS
I and CC
I futures NNS
O were VBD
O introduced VBN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O just RB
O ca MD
O n<apost>t RB
O believe VB
O that IN
I the DT
I innovations NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I financial JJ
I market NN
O are VBP
O causing VBG
I any DT
O of IN
I this DT
I volatility NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O says VBZ
O <period> <period>
O And CC
I Robert NNP
I D<period> NNP
I Arnott NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I president NN
O of IN
I asset NN
I allocator NN
I First NNP
I Quadrant NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O notes VBZ
O that IN
O before IN
I Friday NNP
B <apost>s POS
I tailspin NN
O <comma> <comma>
I daily JJ
I volatility NN
O on IN
I the DT
I New NNP
I York NNP
I Stock NNP
I Exchange NNP
O in IN
I recent JJ
I weeks NNS
O had VBD
O reached VBN
O <quote> <quote>
I historically RB
I low JJ
I levels NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Some DT
I people NNS
O tend VBP
O to TO
O ignore VB
O that IN
I a DT
I 50-point JJ
I move NN
O is VBZ
O less JJR
O in IN
I percentage NN
I terms NNS
O than IN
I it PRP
O was VBD
O when WRB
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O was VBD
O lower JJR
O <period> <period>
I John NNP
I J<period> NNP
I Phelan NNP
I Jr<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I chairman NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Big NNP
I Board NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O asserts VBZ
O that IN
O <quote> <quote>
I 1988 CD
I and CC
I 1989 CD
O have VBP
O been VBN
I two CD
O of IN
I the DT
I least JJS
I volatile JJ
I years NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I last JJ
I 30 CD
I or CC
I 40 CD
I years NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O But CC
I the DT
I low JJ
I average JJ
I volatility NN
B Mr<period> NNP
I Phelan NNP
O is VBZ
O talking VBG
O about IN
O is VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
I any DT
I comfort NN
O in IN
I a DT
I period NN
O of IN
I rapid JJ
I stock-market NN
I moves NNS
O like IN
I the DT
I past JJ
I week NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I addition NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Sanford NNP
I Grossman NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Wharton NNP
I School NNP
I finance NN
I professor NN
O <comma> <comma>
O says VBZ
I volatile JJ
I jumps NNS
O in IN
I stock NN
I prices NNS
O will MD
O continue VB
O as RB
O long RB
O as IN
I liquidity NN
O falls VBZ
O short NN
O of IN
I the DT
I voracious JJ
I demands NNS
O of IN
I institutions NNS
O <quote> <quote>
I who WP
O can MD
O go VB
O out IN
O and CC
O say VBP
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O have VBP
I a DT
I billion CD
I dollars NNS
O of IN
I stocks NNS
O to TO
O sell VB
O <period> <period>
O <apost> <quote>
O <quote> <quote>
I Some DT
I people NNS
O think VBP
I the DT
I search NN
O for IN
I liquidity NN
O is VBZ
O fruitless JJ
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I 1936 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I John NNP
I Maynard NNP
I Keynes NNP
O wrote VBD
O that IN
O <quote> <quote>
O of IN
I the DT
I maxims NNS
O of IN
I orthodox JJ
I finance NN
B none NN
O <comma> <comma>
O surely RB
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
O more RBR
O antisocial JJ
O than IN
I the DT
I fetish NN
O of IN
I liquidity NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I It PRP
O leads VBZ
I investors NNS
O to TO
O focus VB
O on IN
I short-term JJ
I price NN
I movements NNS
O -- =colon=
O <quote> <quote>
I a DT
I game NN
O of IN
I musical JJ
I chairs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O called VBD
I it PRP
O -- =colon=
O rather RB
O than IN
O on IN
I long-term JJ
I fundamental JJ
I valuation NN
O <period> <period>
I James NNP
I A<period> NNP
I White NNP
O contributed VBD
O to TO
I this DT
I article NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I National NNP
I Aeronautics NNP
I and CC
I Space NNP
I Administration NNP
O said VBD
I a DT
I computer NN
I virus NN
O has VBZ
O infected VBN
I one CD
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I networks NNS
O and CC
O is VBZ
O spreading VBG
I anti-nuclear JJ
I messages NNS
O related VBN
O to TO
I its PRP<dollar>
I Galileo NNP
I space NN
I probe NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O is VBZ
O to TO
O be VB
O launched VBN
I today NN
O <period> <period>
I Charles NNP
I Redmond NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I NASA NNP
I spokesman NN
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I the DT
I agency NN
O discovered VBD
I the DT
I virus NN
O on IN
I Monday NNP
O on IN
I the DT
I collection NN
O of IN
I computer NN
I networks NNS
O collectively RB
O called VBN
I Internet NNP
O and CC
O expected VBN
I 100 CD
I university NN
I centers NNS
O to TO
O be VB
O infected VBN
O by IN
I today NN
O <period> <period>
O Although IN
I the DT
I network NN
O is VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O connected VBN
O to TO
I the DT
I computer NN
I systems NNS
B that WDT
O operate VBP
O either DT
I Galileo NNP
O or CC
I the DT
I shuttle NN
O <comma> <comma>
I part NN
O of IN
I the DT
I network NN
O will MD
O carry VB
I analyses NNS
O of IN
I Galileo NNP
I data NNS
O once RB
I the DT
I craft NN
O gets VBZ
O spaceborn JJ
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Redmond NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I intruder NN
O had VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O yet RB
O done VBN
I any DT
I harm NN
O but CC
I the DT
I agency NN
O feared VBD
O <quote> <quote>
I garbage NN
I data NNS
O could MD
O be VB
O substituted VBN
O for IN
I real JJ
I data NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I He PRP
O estimated VBD
I it PRP
O could MD
O take VB
I a DT
I day NN
O for IN
I a DT
I computer NN
I security NN
I manager NN
O to TO
O expunge VB
I the DT
I virus NN
O from IN
I a DT
I computer NN
I system NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I intruder NN
O <comma> <comma>
O among IN
I the DT
I broadest JJS
I yet RB
O to TO
O hit VB
I a DT
I research NN
I network NN
O <comma> <comma>
O appeared VBD
O to TO
O affect VB
I only RB
I Digital NNP
I Equipment NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
I hardware NN
B that WDT
O uses VBZ
I Digital NNP
B <apost>s POS
I VAX<bslash><fslash>VMS NNP
I operating VBG
I system NN
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O is VBZ
O unrelated JJ
O to TO
I the DT
I much-publicized JJ
I virus NN
B that IN
B last JJ
I year NN
O infected VBN
I Arpanet NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I much RB
I larger JJR
I network NN
O used VBN
O by IN
I researchers NNS
O at IN
I universities NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I laboratories NNS
O and CC
I government NN
I agencies NNS
O around IN
I the DT
I world NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I the DT
I lingo NN
O of IN
I computer NN
I security NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I NASA NNP
I intruder NN
O is VBZ
O technically RB
I a DT
I computer NN
I worm NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Redmond NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I worm NN
O resides VBZ
O in IN
I the DT
I operating VBG
I system NN
O of IN
I a DT
I computer NN
O and CC
O spreads VBZ
O by IN
O boring JJ
O into IN
I other JJ
I computers NNS
O contacted VBN
O through IN
I networks NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Galileo NNP
I worm NN
O apparently RB
O was VBD
O hatched VBN
O on IN
I a DT
I computer NN
O in IN
I France NNP
O hooked VBD
O up IN
O to TO
I NASA NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Space NNP
I Physics NNP
I Analysis NNP
I Network NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Redmond NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I NASA NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I Galileo NNP
I worm NN
O had VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O affected VBN
I its PRP<dollar>
I computers NNS
O or CC
I the DT
I computers NNS
O of IN
I other JJ
I government NN
I agencies NNS
O because IN
I they PRP
O had VBD
O modified VBN
I their PRP<dollar>
I systems NNS
O to TO
O reject VB
I worms NNS
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I Mr<period> NNP
I Redmond NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I worm NN
O hit VBD
I universities NNS
B that WDT
O had VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O elected VBN
O to TO
O make VB
I the DT
I changes NNS
O <period> <period>
I Michael NNP
I Alexander NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I senior JJ
I editor NN
O at IN
I Computerworld NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I trade NN
I publication NN
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I he PRP
O was VBD
O told VBN
O that IN
I the DT
I worm NN
O gets VBZ
O into IN
I a DT
I computer NN
I center NN
O by IN
O looking VBG
O for IN
I obvious JJ
I passwords NNS
O -- =colon=
O such JJ
O as IN
I ones NNS
B that WDT
O are VBP
O the DT
O same JJ
O as IN
I the DT
I user NN
B <apost>s POS
I name NN
O <period> <period>
O If IN
I it PRP
O finds VBZ
I one CD
O and CC
O gets VBZ
O into IN
I the DT
I system NN
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O will MD
O display VB
I a DT
I screen NN
O when WRB
I a DT
I user NN
O logs NNS
O on IN
I that DT
O says VBZ
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Worms NNPS
O Against IN
I Nuclear NNP
I Killers NNPS
O <period><period><period> =colon=
O <period> <period>
I You PRP
O talk VBP
O of IN
I times NNS
O of IN
I peace NN
O for IN
I all DT
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O then RB
O prepare VB
O for IN
I war NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O In IN
I addition NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Alexander NNP
O said VBD
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I worm NN
O sends VBZ
I strange JJ
I messages NNS
O to TO
I other JJ
I machines NNS
O at IN
I the DT
I center NN
O -- =colon=
O such JJ
O as IN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I George NNP
I Orwell NNP
O was VBD
I an DT
I optimist NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O or CC
O <quote> <quote>
O Do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O feed VB
I the DT
I bats NNS
B tonight RB
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I worm NN
O also RB
O looks VBZ
O for IN
I elementary JJ
I passwords NNS
B that WDT
O confer VBP
I more JJR
I privileges NNS
O on IN
I the DT
I user NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I passwords NNS
O are VBP
O included VBN
O in IN
I the DT
I system NN
I software NN
O when WRB
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O installed VBN
O but CC
O are VBP
O supposed VBN
O to TO
O be VB
O replaced VBN
O as RB
O soon RB
O as IN
I the DT
I system NN
O is VBZ
O up IN
O and CC
O running VBG
O <period> <period>
O If IN
I it PRP
O finds VBZ
I one CD
O of IN
I those DT
I passwords NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Alexander NNP
O said VBD
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I worm NN
O will MD
O do VB
I such JJ
I things NNS
O as IN
O change NN
I users NNS
B <apost> POS
I passwords NNS
O to TO
I a DT
I series NN
O of IN
I random JJ
I numbers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O preventing VBG
I them PRP
O from IN
O signing VBG
O on IN
O to TO
I the DT
I network NN
O <period> <period>
I NASA NNP
O estimated VBD
O that IN
O <comma> <comma>
O on IN
I Monday NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I about IN
I four CD
I computer NN
I centers NNS
O were VBD
O affected VBN
O <period> <period>
I Yesterday NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I number NN
O grew VBD
O to TO
I 40 CD
O <colon> =colon=
I today NN
B the DT
I number NN
O is VBZ
O expected VBN
O to TO
O grow VB
O to TO
I 100 CD
O <period> <period>
I NASA NNP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O will MD
O take VB
I about IN
I a DT
I week NN
O before IN
I it PRP
O knows VBZ
I exactly RB
I how WRB
I many JJ
I centers NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I 6<comma>000 CD
O connected VBN
O to TO
I Internet NNP
O were VBD
O affected VBN
O and CC
I the DT
I extent NN
O of IN
I the DT
I damage NN
O <comma> <comma>
O if IN
I any DT
O <period> <period>
I Anti-nuclear JJ
I activists NNS
O have VBP
O protested VBN
I the DT
I launch NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Galileo NNP
I space NN
I probe NN
O to TO
I Jupiter NNP
O because IN
I it PRP
O uses VBZ
I plutonium NN
O to TO
O generate VB
I the DT
I electricity NN
O needed VBN
O to TO
O run VB
I the DT
I craft NN
O <period> <period>
I Activists NNS
O fear VBP
O that IN
O if IN
I the DT
I shuttle NN
O carrying VBG
I Galileo NNP
O into IN
I orbit NN
O should MD
O explode VB
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
O if IN
I Galileo NNP
I itself PRP
O crashes VBZ
O into IN
I the DT
I Earth NNP
O during IN
I the DT
I two CD
I times NNS
B it PRP
O flies VBZ
O close RB
O to TO
I the DT
I planet NN
O <comma> <comma>
I fatal JJ
I levels NNS
O of IN
I plutonium NN
O would MD
O be VB
O released VBN
O into IN
I the DT
I atmosphere NN
O <period> <period>
O So RB
O far RB
I Galileo NNP
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O delayed VBN
O twice RB
O <comma> <comma>
O once RB
O because IN
O of IN
I a DT
I computer NN
I malfunction NN
O connected VBN
O with IN
I a DT
I space-shuttle NN
I engine NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I yesterday NN
O because IN
O of IN
I the DT
I weather NN
O <period> <period>
I NASA NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I Galileo NNP
I worm NN
O had VBD
I nothing NN
O to TO
O do VB
O with IN
I either DT
I delay NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Alexander NNP
O of IN
I Computerworld NNP
O said VBD
I hackers NNS
O have VBP
O gone VBN
O after IN
I SPAN NNP
O before RB
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O said VBD
I the DT
I Chaos NNP
I Computer NNP
I Club NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O of IN
I West NNP
I Germany NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O once RB
O managed VBD
O to TO
O invade VB
I SPAN NNP
O and CC
O do VBP
I such JJ
I things NNS
O as IN
O change NN
I the DT
I value NN
O of IN
I pi NN
O <comma> <comma>
O messing VBG
O up IN
I some DT
I calculations NNS
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O is VBZ
O now RB
I a DT
I commonplace NN
O that IN
I prosecutors NNS
O are VBP
O bringing VBG
I criminal JJ
I indictments NNS
O in IN
I cases NNS
O where WRB
O until IN
I a DT
I few JJ
I years NNS
I ago RB
B only RB
I a DT
I civil JJ
I action NN
O at IN
O most RBS
O would MD
O have VB
O been VBN
O brought VBN
O <period> <period>
O Yet RB
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O also RB
O axiomatic JJ
O that IN
I the DT
I power NN
O to TO
O create VB
I new JJ
I crimes NNS
O belongs VBZ
O only RB
O to TO
I the DT
I legislature NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O not RB
O to TO
I courts NNS
O <period> <period>
O Beginning VBG
O in IN
I the DT
I early JJ
I 19th JJ
I century NN
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O v<period> CC
I Hudson NNP
I and CC
I Goodwin NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Supreme NNP
I Court NNP
O has VBZ
O repeatedly RB
O held VBN
O that IN
I a DT
I judicial JJ
I power NN
O to TO
O declare VB
I conduct NN
O to TO
O be VB
O against IN
I the DT
I public JJ
I interest NN
O and CC
O hence RB
O criminal JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O while IN
O well RB
O established VBN
O in IN
I British JJ
I law NN
O <comma> <comma>
O would MD
O usurp VB
I legislative JJ
I authority NN
O under IN
I the DT
I doctrine NN
O of IN
I separation NN
O of IN
I powers NNS
O <period> <period>
I That DT
O <apost>s VBZ
I the DT
I conventional JJ
I theory NN
O anyway RB
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I practice NN
O <comma> <comma>
O however RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I line NN
O between IN
I interpretation NN
I and CC
I redefinition NN
O of IN
I the DT
I criminal JJ
I law NN
O long JJ
O ago RB
O began VBD
O to TO
O blur VB
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I particular JJ
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I common JJ
I law NN
O of IN
I white-collar JJ
I crime NN
O has VBZ
O developed VBN
O with IN
I surprising JJ
I rapidity NN
O over IN
I the DT
I past JJ
I decade NN
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I example NN
O <comma> <comma>
O although IN
I insider NN
I trading NN
O has VBZ
O long RB
O been VBN
O criminal JJ
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O has VBZ
O never RB
O been VBN
O statutorily RB
O defined VBN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I 1983 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Supreme NNP
I Court NNP
O tried VBD
O to TO
O supply VB
I a DT
I workable JJ
I definition NN
O in IN
O the DT
O Dirks NNP
O v<period> CC
I SEC NNP
O decision NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O found VBD
O that DT
I liability NN
O depended VBD
O on IN
O whether IN
I the DT
I tipper NN
O had VBD
O breached VBN
I his PRP<dollar>
I fiduciary JJ
I duty NN
O to TO
I the DT
I corporation NN
O in IN
O order NN
O to TO
O obtain VB
O <quote> <quote>
I some DT
I personal JJ
I gain NN
O <quote> <quote>
O and CC
O whether IN
I the DT
I tippee NN
O knew VBD
O or CC
O recklessly RB
O disregarded VBD
I this DT
I fact NN
O <period> <period>
O Gradually RB
O <comma> <comma>
O however RB
O <comma> <comma>
I lower JJR
I courts NNS
O and CC
I prosecutors NNS
O have VBP
O pushed VBN
I this DT
I definition NN
O to TO
I its PRP<dollar>
I breaking NN
I point NN
O <period> <period>
O Consider VB
I the DT
I facts NNS
O underlying VBG
I the DT
I 1989 CD
I conviction NN
O of IN
I Robert NNP
I Chestman NNP
O <period> <period>
O Prior RB
O to TO
I a DT
I tender NN
I offer NN
O by IN
I A<amp>P NNP
O for IN
I Waldbaum NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O in IN
I 1986 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I founder NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Waldbaum NNP
B <apost>s POS
I supermarket NN
I chain NN
O called VBD
I an DT
I elderly JJ
I relative JJ
O to TO
O tell VB
I her PRP<dollar>
O to TO
O assemble VB
I her PRP<dollar>
I stock NN
I certificates NNS
O for IN
I delivery NN
O <period> <period>
I She PRP
O called VBD
I her PRP<dollar>
I daughter NN
O to TO
O take VB
I her PRP<dollar>
O to TO
I the DT
I bank NN
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I turn NN
O <comma> <comma>
O persuaded VBD
I her PRP<dollar>
I husband NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Mr<period> NNP
I Loeb NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
O run VB
I this DT
I errand NN
O <period> <period>
O Hearing NNP
O of IN
I this DT
I information NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I husband NN
O discussed VBD
I it PRP
O with IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I broker NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Chestman NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Mr<period> NNP
I Chestman NNP
O then RB
O bought VBD
O for IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I own JJ
I account NN
O and CC
I other JJ
I clients NNS
O <period> <period>
O Basically RB
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Chestman NNP
O was VBD
I a DT
I fourth-level JJ
I tippee NN
O <period> <period>
O Did VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Loeb NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I his PRP<dollar>
I tipper NN
O <comma> <comma>
O breach NN
I a DT
I fiduciary JJ
I duty NN
O <lparen> <lparen>
O and CC
O <comma> <comma>
O if IN
O so RB
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I whom WP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O ? <period>
O Did VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Loeb NNP
O seek VB
I personal JJ
I gain NN
O <lparen> <lparen>
O and CC
O if IN
O so RB
O <comma> <comma>
O how WRB
O <rparen> <rparen>
O ? <period>
O Or CC
O did VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Chestman NNP
O only RB
O hear VB
I a DT
I market NN
I rumor NN
O <lparen> <lparen>
I which WDT
B one PRP
O may MD
O lawfully RB
O trade VB
O upon IN
O <rparen> <rparen>
O ? <period>
I The DT
I line NN
O seems VBZ
O awfully RB
O thin JJ
O for IN
I criminal-law NN
I purposes NNS
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I second JJ
I illustration NN
O is VBZ
O supplied VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I recent JJ
I guilty JJ
I plea NN
O entered VBN
O by IN
I Robert NNP
I Freeman NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O formerly RB
I head VBP
O of IN
I arbitrage NN
O at IN
I Goldman NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Sachs NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co NNP
O <period> <period>
O Essentially RB
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Freeman NNP
O had VBD
O invested VBN
O heavily RB
O in IN
I the DT
I Beatrice NNP
I leveraged JJ
I buy-out NN
O <comma> <comma>
O when WRB
I he PRP
O was VBD
O told VBN
O by IN
I another DT
I prominent JJ
I trader NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Bernard NNP
I <quote> <quote>
I Bunny NNP
I <quote> <quote>
I Lasker NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O that IN
I the DT
I deal NN
O was VBD
O in IN
I trouble NN
O <period> <period>
O After IN
O placing VBG
I orders NNS
O to TO
O sell VB
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Freeman NNP
O called VBD
I Martin NNP
I Siegel NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I investment NN
I banker NN
O at IN
I Kidder NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Peabody NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O was VBD
O advising VBG
O on IN
I the DT
I deal NN
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
O confirm VB
I these DT
I rumors NNS
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Siegel NNP
O asked VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Freeman NNP
B who WP
B his PRP<dollar>
I source NN
O was VBD
O and CC
O <comma> <comma>
O on IN
O hearing NN
O that IN
I it PRP
O was VBD
I Bunny NNP
I Lasker NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O responded VBD
O =colon= =colon=
O <quote> <quote>
O Well UH
O <comma> <comma>
I your PRP<dollar>
I bunny NN
O has VBZ
I a DT
I good JJ
I nose NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I illegal JJ
I <quote> <quote>
I tip NN
I <quote> <quote>
O of IN
I the DT
I bunny NN
B <apost>s POS
I good JJ
I nose NN
O was VBD
O then RB
O largely RB
I a DT
I confirmation NN
O of IN
I rumors NNS
O already RB
O known VBN
O to TO
I many VB
O in IN
I the DT
I market NN
O <period> <period>
O Had VBD
I the DT
I case NN
O gone VBN
O to TO
I trial VB
B the DT
I same JJ
I issues NNS
O would MD
O have VB
O surfaced VBN
O =colon= =colon=
O Was VBD
I there EX
B a DT
I fiduciary JJ
I breach NN
O in IN
O order NN
O to TO
O obtain VB
I personal JJ
I gain NN
O ? <period>
O Did VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Freeman NNP
O have VBP
I notice NN
O of IN
I this DT
O ? <period>
O Finally RB
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
I the DT
I information NN
O material NN
O ? <period>
O Yet RB
O <comma> <comma>
I all PDT
I these DT
I issues NNS
O are VBP
O subsidiary NN
O to TO
I a DT
I more RBR
I central JJ
I issue NN
O =colon= =colon=
I Who WP
O is VBZ
O and CC
I who WP
O should MD
O be VB
O making VBG
I the DT
I criminal JJ
I law NN
O here RB
O ? <period>
I It PRP
O is VBZ
O not RB
I my PRP<dollar>
I contention NN
O that IN
O either DT
I Mr<period> NNP
I Chestman NNP
O or CC
I Mr<period> NNP
I Freeman NNP
O was VBD
I an DT
I innocent JJ
I victim NN
O of IN
I prosecutorial JJ
I overzealousness NN
O <period> <period>
O Arguably RB
O <comma> <comma>
I both DT
O were VBD
O on IN
I notice NN
O that IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I behavior NN
O was VBD
O at IN
O least JJS
O risky JJ
O <period> <period>
O But CC
O even RB
O if IN
I they PRP
O behaved VBD
O recklessly RB
O <comma> <comma>
I reasons NNS
O still RB
O exist VBP
O to TO
O fear VB
O and CC
O resist VB
I this DT
I steady JJ
I process NN
O of IN
I case-by-case JJ
I judicial JJ
I extension NN
O of IN
I the DT
I law NN
O of IN
I insider NN
I trading NN
O <period> <period>
I Courts NNS
I and CC
I legislatures NNS
O make VBP
I decisions NNS
O in IN
I very RB
I different JJ
I ways NNS
O and CC
O are VBP
O each DT
O susceptible JJ
O to TO
I very RB
I different JJ
I kinds NNS
O of IN
I errors NNS
O <period> <period>
I After-the-fact JJ
I judicial JJ
I examination NN
O of IN
I an DT
I actor NN
B <apost>s POS
I conduct NN
O has VBZ
O always RB
O been VBN
I the DT
I common JJ
I law NN
B <apost>s POS
I method NN
O <period> <period>
O When WRB
I only RB
I civil JJ
I liability NN
O is VBZ
O involved VBN
O <comma> <comma>
I this DT
I method NN
O has VBZ
I the DT
I undeniable JJ
I strengths NNS
O of IN
I factual JJ
I specificity NN
O and CC
I avoidance NN
O of IN
I overgeneralization NN
O <period> <period>
O Still RB
O <comma> <comma>
I case-by-case JJ
I retrospective NN
I decision NN
I making VBG
O of IN
I this DT
I sort NN
O is VBZ
O vulnerable JJ
O to TO
I the DT
I tunnel NN
I vision NN
O caused VBN
O by IN
I a DT
I fixation NN
O on IN
I ad NN
I hoc FW
I <lparen> <lparen>
I and CC
I usually RB
I sleazy JJ
I <rparen> <rparen>
I examples NNS
O <period> <period>
O When WRB
I a DT
I court NN
O decides VBZ
O that IN
I a DT
I particular JJ
I actor NN
B <apost>s POS
I conduct NN
O was VBD
O culpable JJ
O and CC
O so RB
O extends VBZ
I the DT
I definition NN
O of IN
I insider NN
I trading NN
O to TO
O reach VB
I this DT
I conduct NN
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O does VBZ
O not RB
O see VB
I the DT
I potentially RB
I enormous JJ
I number NN
O of IN
I other JJ
I cases NNS
B that WDT
O will MD
O be VB
O covered VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I expanded VBN
I rule NN
O <period> <period>
O Thus RB
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I court NN
O is VBZ
O poorly RB
O positioned VBN
O to TO
O make VB
I judgments NNS
O about IN
I the DT
I social JJ
I utility NN
O of IN
I the DT
I expanded VBN
I rule NN
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I example NN
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
O focusing VBG
O on IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Freeman NNP
B <apost>s POS
I attempt NN
O to TO
O gain VB
I nonpublic JJ
I information NN
O about IN
I a DT
I deal NN
B <apost>s POS
I collapse NN
O <comma> <comma>
I one CD
O does VBZ
O not RB
O naturally RB
O think VB
O about IN
I the DT
I reverse NN
I side NN
O of IN
I the DT
I coin NN
O =colon= =colon=
I What WP
O if IN
I the DT
I rumor NN
O had VBD
O been VBN
O false JJ
O ? <period>
O Can MD
I a DT
I security NN
I analyst NN
O call NN
I an DT
I investment NN
I banker NN
O to TO
O make VB
O certain JJ
O that IN
I a DT
I seemingly RB
I improbable JJ
I rumor NN
O is VBZ
O in IN
O fact NN
O false JJ
O ? <period>
O In IN
I the DT
I past NN
O <comma> <comma>
O not RB
O only RB
O would MD
I reputable JJ
I professionals NNS
O have VB
O rushed VBN
O to TO
O check VB
O out RP
I such JJ
I rumors NNS
O with IN
I the DT
I company NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I companies NNS
O listed VBN
O on IN
I the DT
I major JJ
I stock NN
I exchanges NNS
O were VBD
O encouraged VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I exchanges NNS
O to TO
O respond VB
O openly RB
O to TO
I such JJ
I inquiries NNS
O from IN
I securities NNS
I analysts NNS
O <period> <period>
I Today NN
O <comma> <comma>
O after IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Freeman NNP
B <apost>s POS
I plea NN
O <comma> <comma>
I there EX
O is VBZ
I an DT
I uncertainty NN
B that WDT
O is VBZ
O both DT
O unfair JJ
O and CC
O inefficient JJ
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I this DT
I light NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I comparative JJ
I advantages NNS
O of IN
I legislative JJ
I law-making NNS
O become VBP
O clear JJ
O =colon= =colon=
O <lparen> <lparen>
O 1 CD
O <rparen> <rparen>
O Before IN
I it PRP
O acts VBZ
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I legislature NN
O typically RB
O will MD
O hear VB
I the DT
I views NNS
O of IN
I representatives NNS
O of IN
I all PDT
I those DT
O affected VBN
O by IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I decision NN
O <comma> <comma>
O not RB
I just RB
I the DT
I immediate JJ
I parties NNS
O before IN
I the DT
I court NN
O <colon> =colon=
O and CC
O <lparen> <lparen>
O 2 CD
O <rparen> <rparen>
I the DT
I legislature NN
O can MD
O frame VB
I <quote> <quote>
I bright JJ
I line NN
I <quote> <quote>
I standards NNS
B that WDT
O create VBP
I less JJR
I uncertainty NN
O than IN
I the DT
I fact-bound JJ
I decisions NNS
O of IN
I courts NNS
O <period> <period>
O Although IN
I legislative JJ
I lines NNS
O can MD
O result VB
O in IN
I under-inclusion NN
O <lparen> <lparen>
I which WDT
O explains VBZ
O why WRB
I the DT
I SEC NNP
O has VBZ
O long RB
O resisted VBN
I a DT
I legislative JJ
I definition NN
O of IN
I insider NN
I trading NN
O <rparen> <rparen>
O <comma> <comma>
I judicial JJ
I lawmaking JJ
O inevitably RB
O creates VBZ
I uncertainty NN
O because IN
O of IN
I the DT
I shadowy JJ
I outer JJ
I edges NNS
I and CC
I implications NNS
O of IN
I most RBS
I judicial JJ
I decisions NNS
O <period> <period>
O At IN
O least JJS
O when WRB
I the DT
I stakes NNS
O are VBP
O high JJ
O <comma> <comma>
I uncertainty NN
O in IN
I turn NN
O results NNS
O in IN
I overinclusion NN
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
I individuals NNS
O do VBP
O not RB
O dare VB
O to TO
O approach VB
I an DT
I uncertain JJ
I line NN
O closely RB
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I federal JJ
I mail NN
I and CC
I wire NN
I fraud NN
I statutes NNS
O provide VBP
I even RB
I better JJR
I illustrations NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I rapid JJ
I evolution NN
O of IN
I a DT
I federal JJ
I common JJ
I law NN
O of IN
I white-collar JJ
I crime NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I 1987 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Supreme NNP
I Court NNP
O attempted VBD
O in IN
I McNally NNP
O v<period> CC
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O to TO
O halt VB
I the DT
I inexorable JJ
I expansion NN
O of IN
I these DT
I statutes NNS
O by IN
O adopting VBG
I a DT
I rule NN
O of IN
I strict JJ
I construction NN
O for IN
I ambiguous JJ
I criminal JJ
I statues NNS
O <period> <period>
O Yet RB
O <comma> <comma>
I late JJ
I last JJ
I year NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Congress NNP
O effectively RB
O reversed VBD
I this DT
I decision NN
O by IN
O enacting VBG
I a DT
I one-sentence JJ
I statute NN
B that WDT
O defined VBD
I fraud NN
O to TO
O include VB
I any DT
I scheme NN
O to TO
O deprive VB
I another DT
O of IN
O <quote> <quote>
I the DT
I intangible JJ
I right NN
O of IN
I honest JJ
I services NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O At IN
I a DT
I stroke NN
O <comma> <comma>
I this DT
O may MD
O criminalize VB
I all DT
I fiduciary JJ
I breaches NNS
O <lparen> <lparen>
O and CC
O possibly RB
I all DT
I misrepresentations NNS
O by IN
I an DT
I agent NN
I or CC
I employee NN
O <rparen> <rparen>
O <period> <period>
I Such JJ
I a DT
I statute NN
O illustrates VBZ
I the DT
I fundamental JJ
I problem NN
O =colon= =colon=
I Congress NNP
O finds VBZ
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O easier JJR
O to TO
O pass VB
I sweepingly RB
I moralistic JJ
I prohibitions NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
B the DT
I courts NNS
O must MD
O thereafter RB
O interpret VB
O <comma> <comma>
O than IN
O to TO
O engage VB
O in IN
I the DT
I difficult JJ
I line-drawing JJ
I distinctions NNS
B that WDT
O are VBP
O inherently RB
I its PRP<dollar>
I responsibility NN
O <period> <period>
I We PRP
O are VBP
O confronted VBN
O less JJR
O with IN
I a DT
I judicial JJ
I power NN
I grab NN
O than IN
O with IN
I a DT
I legislative JJ
I giveaway NN
O <period> <period>
O Predictably RB
O <comma> <comma>
O when WRB
O confronted VBN
O with IN
I morally RB
I dubious JJ
I behavior NN
O <comma> <comma>
I prosecutors NNS
O will MD
O exploit VB
I the DT
I latitude NN
B such JJ
I openended VBN
I statutes NNS
O give VBP
I them PRP
O <period> <period>
O Over IN
I the DT
I long JJ
I run NN
O <comma> <comma>
O however RB
O <comma> <comma>
I sleazy JJ
I cases NNS
O will MD
O make VB
I bad JJ
I law NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Coffee NNP
O is VBZ
I a DT
I professor NN
O at IN
I Columbia NNP
I Law NNP
I School NNP
O <period> <period>
I Corning NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O posted VBD
I a DT
I 38 CD
I <percent> NN
I decline NN
O in IN
I third-quarter JJ
I net JJ
I income NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 76<period>5 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 80 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 123<period>9 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>37 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I year-earlier JJ
I figure NN
O included VBD
I a DT
I one-time JJ
I gain NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 59<period>9 CD
I million CD
O from IN
I the DT
I sale NN
O of IN
I Corning NNP
B <apost>s POS
I stakes NNS
O in IN
I Japanese JJ
I businesses NNS
O <period> <period>
O Without IN
I the DT
I gain NN
O <comma> <comma>
I operating VBG
I profit NN
O was VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 64 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 71 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I telecommunications NNS
I <comma> <comma>
I specialty NN
I glass NN
I <comma> <comma>
I ceramic JJ
I products NNS
I and CC
I laboratory-services JJ
I concern NN
O said VBD
I the DT
I latest JJS
I quarter NN
O included VBD
I a DT
I tax-loss NN
I carry-forward NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 600<comma>000 CD
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <comma> <comma>
I net NN
O included VBD
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 700<comma>000 CD
I taxlow NN
I carry-forward NN
O <period> <period>
I Sales NNS
O rose VBD
I 14 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 715 CD
I million CD
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 625<period>4 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I Corning NNP
B <apost>s POS
I chairman NN
I and CC
I chief JJ
I executive JJ
I officer NN
O <comma> <comma>
I James NNP
I R<period> NNP
I Houghton NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I operating VBG
I performance NN
O continued VBD
O to TO
O be VB
O strong JJ
O in IN
I the DT
I telecommunications NNS
I and CC
I health NN
I and CC
I science NN
I segments NNS
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I the DT
I specialty-material JJ
I segment NN
O slowed VBD
O somewhat RB
O and CC
I consumer NN
I products NNS
O continued VBD
O below IN
I expectations NNS
O <period> <period>
O As IN
O for IN
I joint JJ
I ventures NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Houghton NNP
O said VBD
I profit NN
O was VBD
O <quote> <quote>
O essentially RB
O flat JJ
O <quote> <quote>
O due JJ
O primarily RB
O to TO
I a DT
I slow JJ
I recovery NN
O at IN
I Samsung-Corning NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O in IN
I Korea NNP
O following VBG
I a DT
I strike NN
O at IN
I a DT
I major JJ
I customer NN
O and CC
I the DT
I disruption NN
O of IN
I shipments NNS
O to TO
I China NNP
O <period> <period>
O Also RB
O <comma> <comma>
I profit NN
O was VBD
O hurt VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I strength NN
O of IN
I the DT
I dollar NN
O overseas JJ
I which WDT
O negatively RB
O affected VBN
I the DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I currency-exchange JJ
I rate NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I New NNP
I York NNP
I Stock NNP
I Exchange NNP
I composite JJ
I trading NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Corning NNP
O closed VBD
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 38<period>50 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O down RB
I 75 CD
I cents NNS
O <period> <period>
I UAL NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I hair-trigger JJ
I stock NN
B that WDT
O exploded VBD
I Friday NNP
B <apost>s POS
I market NN
I bombshell NN
O <comma> <comma>
O briefly NN
O traumatized VBD
I traders NNS
O again RB
I yesterday NN
O <period> <period>
O Within IN
I 10 CD
I minutes NNS
O after IN
I an DT
I 11=colon=13 CD
I a<period>m<period> NN
I trading NN
I halt NN
O in IN
I UAL NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I parent NN
O of IN
I United NNP
I Airlines NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Dow NNP
I Jones NNP
I Industrial NNP
I Average NNP
O plunged VBD
I nearly RB
I 27 CD
I points NNS
O to TO
I a DT
I 60<period>25-point JJ
I deficit NN
O <period> <period>
I Computer-guided JJ
I buying NN
O then RB
O kicked VBD
O in IN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I the DT
I industrials NNS
O regained VBD
I 27 CD
I points NNS
O in IN
I five CD
I minutes NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I lightning NN
I moves NNS
O show VBP
O that IN
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O remains VBZ
O fragile JJ
O and CC
O volatile JJ
O -- =colon=
O ready JJ
O to TO
O jump VB
O at IN
I the DT
I slightest JJS
I rumor NN
O -- =colon=
I a DT
I few JJ
I days NNS
O after IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I shocking JJ
I 190<period>58-point JJ
I plunge NN
O <period> <period>
I Nervous JJ
I investors NNS
O continued VBD
O to TO
O limit VB
I their PRP<dollar>
I buying NN
O to TO
I blue-chip JJ
I stocks NNS
O while IN
O dumping VBG
I takeover-related JJ
I issues NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I industrial JJ
I average NN
O closed VBD
O down RB
I 18<period>65 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I 2638<period>73 CD
O <period> <period>
I New NNP
I York NNP
I Stock NNP
I Exchange NNP
I volume NN
O was VBD
I a DT
I heavy JJ
I 224<comma>070<comma>000 CD
I shares NNS
O <period> <period>
I Decliners NNS
O on IN
I the DT
I Big NNP
I Board NNP
O outnumbered VBD
I advancers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O 931 CD
O to TO
O 658 CD
O <period> <period>
I UAL NNP
O was VBD
O watched VBN
O closely RB
O and CC
O traded VBN
O heavily RB
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I stock NN
O tumbled VBD
I 24 CD
I 7<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 198 CD
O on IN
I volume NN
O of IN
I 2<period>8 CD
I million CD
I shares NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I market NN
O is VBZ
O still RB
O very RB
O touchy JJ
O about IN
I rumors NNS
O and CC
I news NN
O on IN
I pending VBG
I takeovers NNS
O <period> <period>
I UAL NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O is VBZ
O trying VBG
O to TO
O reconstruct VB
I a DT
I buy-out NN
I bid NN
B that IN
B banks NNS
O would MD
O n<apost>t RB
O finance VB
O <comma> <comma>
O represents VBZ
I the DT
I future NN
O of IN
I one CD
O of IN
I the DT
I most RBS
I powerful JJ
I ingredients NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I bull NN
I market NN
O - =colon=
I corporate JJ
I restructuring NN
O <period> <period>
I An DT
I important JJ
I element NN
O of IN
I this DT
I phenomenon NN
O -- =colon=
I the DT
I now-shaky JJ
I market NN
O for IN
I junk NN
I bonds NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O used VBD
O often RB
O to TO
O finance VB
I restructurings NNS
I and CC
I takeovers NNS
O -- =colon=
O continued VBD
O to TO
O cast VB
I a DT
I pall NN
O over IN
I stocks NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I It PRP
O was VBD
I a DT
I very RB
I nervous JJ
I day NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I John NNP
I Geary NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I partner NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Big NNP
I Board NNP
I specialist NN
I firm NN
I Ziebarth NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Geary NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I volatility NN
O wo MD
O n<apost>t RB
O end VB
O soon RB
O <period> <period>
I This DT
I Friday NNP
O brings VBZ
I the DT
I <quote> <quote>
I double JJ
I witching JJ
I hour NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Wall NNP
I Street NNP
B <apost>s POS
I nickname NN
O for IN
I the DT
I monthly JJ
I simultaneous JJ
I expiration NN
O of IN
I a DT
I variety NN
O of IN
I stock NN
I index NN
I futures NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I index NN
I options NNS
O and CC
I options NNS
O on IN
I individual JJ
I stocks NNS
O <period> <period>
I Traders NNS
O are VBP
O already RB
O buckling VBG
I their PRP<dollar>
I seat NN
I belts NNS
O <period> <period>
I Previous JJ
I monthly JJ
I expirations NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I Major NNP
I Market NNP
I Index NNP
I futures NNS
O and CC
I Standard NNP
I <amp> CC
I Poor NNP
B <apost>s POS
I 100-stock JJ
I index NN
I options NNS
O have VBP
O produced VBN
I spectacular JJ
I volatility NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O are VBP
O in IN
I one CD
O of IN
I those DT
I phases NNS
O where WRB
I you PRP
O are VBP
O going VBG
O to TO
O get VB
I a DT
I lot NN
O of IN
I volatile JJ
I expiration NN
I action NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Donald NNP
I Selkin NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I head NN
O of IN
I stock-index NN
I research NN
O at IN
I Prudential-Bache NNP
I Securities NNP
O <period> <period>
I Investors NNS
O were VBD
O buying VBG
I yesterday NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I they PRP
O were VBD
O running VBG
O scared VBN
O to TO
I premier NN
I blue JJ
I chips NNS
O such JJ
O as IN
I Procter NNP
I <amp> CC
I Gamble NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O jumped VBD
I 3 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 127 CD
O <period> <period>
I Investors NNS
O <quote> <quote>
O are VBP
O buying VBG
I stocks NNS
B that WDT
O have VBP
I predictable JJ
I earnings NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Edward NNP
I J<period> NNP
I Laux NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I head NN
O of IN
I block NN
I trading NN
O at IN
I Kidder NNP
I Peabody NNP
O <period> <period>
O Along IN
I the DT
I way NN
O <comma> <comma>
I investors NNS
O dumped VBD
I takeover NN
I stocks NNS
O and CC
I shares NNS
O of IN
I banks NNS
B that WDT
O have VBP
I leveraged-buy-out JJ
I debt NN
O and CC
I risky JJ
I real JJ
I estate NN
I loans NNS
O on IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I books NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I These DT
I loans NNS
O are VBP
I more JJR
O of IN
I a DT
I focus NN
O than IN
I lesser-developed-country JJ
I debt NN
O now RB
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I William NNP
I Bee NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I senior JJ
I block NN
I trader NN
O at IN
I Prudential-Bache NNP
I Securities NNP
O <period> <period>
I Chase NNP
I Manhattan NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O sold VBD
I 14 CD
I million CD
I additional JJ
I shares NNS
O at IN
I 40 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>8 CD
B Monday NNP
O through IN
I an DT
I underwriting NN
I group NN
O led VBN
O by IN
I Goldman NNP
I Sachs NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O closed VBD
O down RB
I 1<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 40 CD
O <period> <period>
I Citicorp NNP
O fell VBD
I 1<bslash><fslash>2 CD
O to TO
I 32 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Manufacturers NNP
I Hanover NNP
O slipped VBD
I 3<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 40 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O <period> <period>
I Chase NNP
O and CC
I Citicorp NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Citibank NNP
O are VBP
O involved VBN
O in IN
I the DT
I UAL NNP
I buy-out NN
I financing NN
O <period> <period>
O Both DT
I Citicorp NNP
O and CC
I Manufacturers NNP
I Hanover NNP
O reported VBD
I earnings NNS
B yesterday NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I the DT
I first JJ
I hour NN
O of IN
I trading NN
O <comma> <comma>
I about IN
I one CD
I million CD
I shares VBZ
B a DT
I minute NN
O changed VBD
I hands NNS
O on IN
I the DT
I Big NNP
I Board NNP
O as IN
I big JJ
I stock-index NN
I arbitrage NN
I sell NN
I programs NNS
O pushed VBD
I prices NNS
O lower JJR
O <period> <period>
O <lparen> <lparen>
O In IN
I stock-index NN
I arbitrage NN
O <comma> <comma>
I traders NNS
O buy VBP
O or CC
O sell VB
I big JJ
I baskets NNS
O of IN
I stocks NNS
O against IN
I offsetting VBG
I positions NNS
O in IN
I futures NNS
O <period> <period>
O <rparen> <rparen>
I Traders NNS
O said VBD
I many NN
O of IN
I the DT
I sell NN
I programs NNS
O are VBP
I positions NNS
O being VBG
O established VBN
O ahead RB
O of IN
I this DT
I Friday NNP
B <apost>s POS
I expiration NN
O <period> <period>
O Aside RB
O from IN
I computer-guided JJ
I selling NN
O <comma> <comma>
I airline NN
I stocks NNS
O took VBD
I a DT
I beating NN
O as IN
O well RB
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Dow NNP
I Jones NNP
I Transportation NNP
I Average NNP
O fell VBD
I 49<period>96 CD
O to TO
O close VB
O at IN
I 1254<period>27 CD
O <period> <period>
I AMR NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I parent NN
O of IN
I American NNP
I Airlines NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
O continued VBD
O to TO
O retreat VB
O in IN
I the DT
I wake NN
O of IN
I New NNP
I York NNP
I developer NN
I Donald NNP
I Trump NNP
B <apost>s POS
I decision NN
O to TO
O withdraw VB
I his PRP<dollar>
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 120-a-share JJ
I takeover NN
I bid NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I stock NN
O fell VBD
I 3 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O to TO
I 73 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O on IN
I 3<period>4 CD
I million CD
I shares NNS
O <period> <period>
I Delta NNP
I Air NNP
I Lines NNPS
O fell VBD
I 1 CD
I 7<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 67 CD
I 7<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I USAir NNP
I Group NNP
O dropped VBD
I 3<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O to TO
I 40 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I Southwest NNP
I Airlines NNPS
O dipped VBD
I 1<bslash><fslash>2 CD
O to TO
I 25 CD
O and CC
I Alaska NNP
I Air NNP
I Group NNP
O slid VBD
I 3<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 24 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I Texas NNP
I Air NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I owner NN
O of IN
I Continental NNP
O and CC
I Eastern NNP
I airlines NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O bucked VBD
I the DT
I group NN
B <apost>s POS
I decline NN
O by IN
O rising VBG
I 7<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 14 CD
I 5<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O in IN
I American NNP
I Stock NNP
I Exchange NNP
I trading NN
O <period> <period>
I Eastern NNP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O ahead RB
O of IN
I schedule NN
O in IN
O resuming VBG
I its PRP<dollar>
I operations NNS
O after IN
O filing NN
O earlier RBR
I this DT
I year NN
O for IN
I Chapter NN
I 11 CD
I bankruptcy NN
I protection NN
O <comma> <comma>
O from IN
I which WDT
B it PRP
O expects VBZ
O to TO
O emerge VB
I early JJ
I next JJ
I year NN
O <period> <period>
I Philip NNP
I Morris NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I most RBS
I active JJ
I Big NNP
I Board NNP
I issue NN
O for IN
I the DT
I second JJ
I consecutive JJ
I session NN
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
O unchanged JJ
O at IN
I 43 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O on IN
I 3<period>9 CD
I million CD
I shares NNS
O <period> <period>
I Other JJ
I blue-chip JJ
I consumer NN
I issues NNS
O also RB
O fared VBD
O relatively RB
O well RB
O =colon= =colon=
I PepsiCo NNP
O rose VBD
I 1 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 58 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>2 CD
O <colon> =colon=
I Coca-Cola NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O was VBD
O unchanged JJ
O at IN
I 66 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O <colon> =colon=
I McDonald NNP
B <apost>s POS
O also RB
O closed VBD
O unchanged JJ
O at IN
I 30 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>2 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Merck NNP
O rose VBD
I 1<bslash><fslash>2 CD
O to TO
I 75 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O <period> <period>
I Broader JJR
I averages NNS
O also RB
O fell VBD
O <period> <period>
I Standard NNP
I <amp> CC
I Poor NNP
I <apost>s POS
I 500-stock JJ
I index NN
O fell VBD
I 1<period>69 CD
O to TO
I 341<period>16 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I the DT
I New NNP
I York NNP
I Stock NNP
I Exchange NNP
I Composite NNP
I Index NNP
O fell VBD
I 0<period>88 CD
O to TO
I 188<period>89 CD
O <period> <period>
O Among IN
I the DT
I takeover-related JJ
I stocks NNS
B that WDT
O sold VBD
O off IN
I yesterday NN
O were VBD
I Disney NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O closed VBD
O down RB
I 2 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 121 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O <period> <period>
I Philips NNP
I Industries NNPS
O tumbled VBD
I 3<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 22 CD
I 7<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O <colon> =colon=
I Hilton NNP
I Hotels NNPS
O fell VBD
I 2 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>2 CD
O to TO
I 92 CD
O and CC
I Holiday NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O fell VBD
I 2 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 69 CD
I 7<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O <period> <period>
O Among IN
I other JJ
I blue JJ
I chips NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Exxon NNP
O gained VBD
I 1<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 45 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>2 CD
O <period> <period>
I International NNP
I Paper NNP
O fell VBD
I 1 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 51 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>2 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I Union NNP
I Carbide NNP
O eased VBD
I 7<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 25 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I Chevron NNP
O gained VBD
I 1<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 64 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Eastman NNP
I Kodak NNP
O closed VBD
O down RB
I 3<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O to TO
I 44 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I only JJ
I industry NN
I group NN
O to TO
O show VB
I a DT
I gain NN
O from IN
I the DT
I industrial JJ
I average NN
B <apost>s POS
I record NN
I high JJ
O on IN
I Oct<period> NNP
I 9 CD
O is VBZ
I restaurants NNS
O <period> <period>
O Among IN
I the DT
I three CD
I worst-performing JJ
I groups NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I declines NNS
O of IN
I 10 CD
I <percent> NN
I to TO
I 20 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O are VBP
I airlines NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I casinos NNS
O and CC
I securities NNS
I brokers NNS
O <period> <period>
I Trading NN
O also RB
O was VBD
O heavy JJ
O in IN
I the DT
I over-the-counter JJ
I market NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Nasdaq NNP
I composite JJ
I index NN
O closed VBD
O down RB
I 1<period>05 CD
O to TO
I 459<period>93 CD
O on IN
I volume NN
O of IN
I 161<period>5 CD
I million CD
I shares NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I environment NN
O is VBZ
I a DT
I lot NN
O more RBR
O trading-oriented JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Gary NNP
I Rosenbach NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I manager NN
O of IN
I equity NN
I trading NN
O at IN
I the DT
I OTC NNP
I stock NN
I firm NN
I Needham NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co<period> NNP
O in IN
I New NNP
I York NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Because IN
I there EX
O is VBZ
I a DT
I lot NN
O more JJR
O volatility NN
O now RB
O <comma> <comma>
O if IN
I guys NNS
O see VBP
O that IN
I they PRP
O can MD
O make VB
I a DT
I quick JJ
I 10 CD
I <percent> NN
I or CC
I 15 CD
I <percent> NN
I profit NN
O <comma> <comma>
I they PRP
O <apost>ll MD
O take VB
I it PRP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Compaq NNP
I Computer NNP
O gained VBD
I 2 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 103 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O on IN
I two CD
I million CD
I shares NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O reflecting VBG
I market NN
I optimism NN
O about IN
I the DT
I prospects NNS
O for IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I newly RB
I introduced VBN
I notebook-sized JJ
I computer NN
O <period> <period>
I B<period>F<period> NNP
I Goodrich NNP
O dropped VBD
I 1 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 49 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I third-quarter JJ
I earnings NNS
O were VBD
O below IN
O both DT
I analysts NNS
B <apost> POS
I forecasts NNS
O and CC
I the DT
I year-earlier JJ
I level NN
O <period> <period>
I Blue NNP
I Arrow NNP
O added VBD
I 1<bslash><fslash>2 CD
O to TO
I 17 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I British JJ
I company NN
O plans NNS
O to TO
O change VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I name NN
O to TO
I Manpower NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I name NN
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I unit NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O write VB
O off IN
I part NN
O of IN
I nearly RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>2 CD
I billion CD
O in IN
I good JJ
I will NN
O as IN
I a DT
I possible JJ
I prelude NN
O to TO
O reincorporating VBG
O in IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O <period> <period>
I Dravo NNP
O rose VBD
I 5<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 16 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O <period> <period>
I Shearson NNP
I Lehman NNP
I Hutton NNP
O began VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I coverage NN
O of IN
I the DT
I company NN
O with IN
I favorable JJ
I ratings NNS
O <period> <period>
I Intertan NNP
O jumped VBD
I 2 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O to TO
I 56 CD
I 7<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I company NN
O reported VBD
O that IN
I earnings NNS
O from IN
I operations NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I September NNP
I quarter NN
O were VBD
O up IN
I about IN
I 25 CD
I <percent> NN
O from IN
I a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
I Bay NNP
I Financial NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O said VBD
I it PRP
O may MD
O be VB
O forced VBN
O to TO
O file VB
O under IN
I Chapter NN
I 11 CD
O if IN
I it PRP
O ca MD
O n<apost>t RB
O reach VB
I an DT
I agreement NN
O with IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I lenders NNS
O to TO
O relieve VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I debt NN
I burden NN
O <comma> <comma>
O plunged VBD
I 1 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 2 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Amex NNP
I Market NNP
I Value NNP
I Index NNP
O fell VBD
I 1<period>25 CD
O to TO
I 375<period>16 CD
O <period> <period>
I Volume NN
O totaled VBD
I 16<comma>800<comma>000 CD
I shares NNS
O <period> <period>
O Among IN
I active JJ
I Amex NNP
I issues NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I American JJ
I depositary NN
I receipts NNS
O of IN
I B<period>A<period>T NNP
I Industries NNPS
O fell VBD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O to TO
I 11 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O on IN
I turnover NN
O of IN
I 885<comma>800 CD
O <period> <period>
I Investment NN
I bankers NNS
O and CC
I retailers NNS
O said VBD
I the DT
I turmoil NN
O on IN
I Wall NNP
I Street NNP
O may MD
O benefit VB
I managers NNS
B who WP
O plan VBP
O to TO
O bid VB
O for IN
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I retailing NN
I units NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I British JJ
I firm NN
O because IN
I takeover NN
I prices NNS
O may MD
O not RB
O be VB
O as RB
O high JJ
O as IN
O before IN
I the DT
I recent JJ
I correction NN
O <period> <period>
I Fruit NNP
O of IN
I the DT
I Loom NNP
O slipped VBD
I 1<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O to TO
I 12 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O on IN
I 501<comma>200 CD
I shares NNS
O <period> <period>
I DWG NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O jumped VBD
I 1 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O to TO
I 15 CD
O on IN
I 454<comma>100 CD
I shares NNS
O <period> <period>
I Carnival NNP
I Cruise NNP
I Lines NNP
I Class NNP
I A DT
O dropped VBD
I 1 CD
O to TO
I 21 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O on IN
I 331<comma>400 CD
I shares NNS
O <period> <period>
I Amex NNP
I issues NNS
O with IN
I big JJ
I percentage NN
I price NN
I gains NNS
O included VBD
I two CD
I Eastern NNP
I Air NNP
I Lines NNPS
I preferred JJ
I stocks NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O reacting VBG
O to TO
I the DT
I news NN
O about IN
I improved VBN
I recovery NN
O in IN
I flight NN
I schedules NNS
O after IN
I the DT
I company NN
O filed VBN
O for IN
I bankruptcy NN
I protection NN
O <period> <period>
I Eastern NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Class NNP
I F NN
I preferred JJ
O rose VBD
I 12 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 1 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I 11 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O <colon> =colon=
I the DT
I Class NNP
I E NN
I preferred JJ
O gained VBD
I 7 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 5<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I 10 CD
I 1<bslash><fslash>4 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I biggest JJS
I percentage NN
I gainer NN
O on IN
I the DT
I Amex NNP
O was VBD
I Enviropact NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O jumped VBD
I 23 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 5<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I 3 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O on IN
I volume NN
O of IN
I 29<comma>000 CD
I shares NNS
O <period> <period>
O On IN
I Monday NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I company NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I provider NN
O of IN
I environmental JJ
I consulting NN
I services NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O reported VBD
I a DT
I wider RBR
I fiscal JJ
I fourth-quarter JJ
I loss NN
O and CC
O predicted VBD
I a DT
I loss NN
O for IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I fiscal JJ
I 1990 CD
I first JJ
I quarter NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O said VBD
I a DT
I profit NN
O is VBZ
O expected VBN
O for IN
I all DT
O of IN
I fiscal JJ
I 1990 CD
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I its PRP<dollar>
I auditor NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Ernst NNP
I <amp> CC
I Young NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I Enviropact NNP
B <apost>s POS
I financial JJ
I situation NN
O raises VBZ
O <quote> <quote>
I substantial JJ
I doubt NN
O about IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I ability NN
O to TO
O continue VB
O as IN
I a DT
I going VBG
I concern NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mission NNP
I Resource NNP
I Partners NNPS
O advanced VBD
I 8 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 1 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I 18 CD
I 7<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O <period> <period>
I Sonja NNP
I Steptoe NNP
O and CC
I David NNP
I Wilson NNP
O contributed VBD
O to TO
I this DT
I article NN
O <period> <period>
I ONE CD
I LIBERTY NNP
I PROPERTIES NNPS
I Inc<period> NNP
O declared VBD
I a DT
I dividend NN
O of IN
I 40 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O on IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 16<period>50 CD
I cumulative JJ
I convertible JJ
I preferred JJ
I stock NN
O <comma> <comma>
O payable JJ
I Jan<period> NNP
I 2 CD
O to TO
I stock VB
O of IN
I record NN
B Dec<period> NNP
I 8 CD
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I directors NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I Great NNP
I Neck NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I N<period>Y<period> NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I real JJ
I estate NN
I investment NN
I trust NN
O did VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O act VB
O on IN
I the DT
I common JJ
I stock NN
I dividend NN
O <period> <period>
O And CC
I they PRP
O wo MD
O n<apost>t RB
O consider VB
I such JJ
I a DT
I dividend NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I trust NN
O added VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O before IN
I results NNS
O are VBP
O available JJ
O for IN
I the DT
I first JJ
I quarter NN
O of IN
I 1990 CD
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I part NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I trust NN
O cited VBD
I the DT
I need NN
O to TO
O retain VB
I cash NN
O for IN
I possible JJ
I acquisitions NNS
O <period> <period>
O According VBG
O to TO
I a DT
I spokesman NN
O <comma> <comma>
I One CD
I Liberty NNP
O will MD
O have VB
O paid VBN
O out RP
O as IN
I dividends NNS
B the DT
I required VBN
I amount NN
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I taxable JJ
I income NN
O to TO
O maintain VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I legal JJ
I status NN
O as IN
I a DT
I real JJ
I estate NN
I investment NN
I trust NN
O <period> <period>
I Banks NNS
O are VBP
O continuing VBG
O to TO
O go VB
O after IN
I individual JJ
I investors NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O despite IN
I falling VBG
I interest NN
I rates NNS
O <period> <period>
I Yields NNS
O on IN
I small-denomination NN
I certificates NNS
O of IN
I deposit NN
O fell VBD
O at IN
I about IN
I half PDT
I the DT
I rate NN
O of IN
I so-called JJ
I jumbo JJ
I CDs NNS
B this DT
I week NN
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I Banxquote NNP
I Money NNP
I Markets NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I information NN
I service NN
O based VBN
O here RB
O <period> <period>
I Investors NNS
O can MD
O get VB
I slightly RB
I higher JJR
I yields NNS
O on IN
I deposits NNS
O below IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 50<comma>000 CD
O than IN
I they PRP
O can MD
O on IN
I deposits NNS
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 90<comma>000 CD
I and CC
I up RB
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Banks NNP
O want VBP
O to TO
O remain VB
O competitive JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Norberto NNP
I Mehl NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I chairman NN
O of IN
I Banxquote NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I October NNP
O is VBZ
I a DT
I big JJ
I rollover NN
I month NN
O and CC
O perhaps RB
I they PRP
O anticipate VBP
I greater JJR
I demand NN
I <period><period><period> =colon=
O among IN
I people NNS
O leaving VBG
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Some DT
I bankers NNS
O are VBP
O reporting VBG
I more JJR
I inquiries NNS
O than IN
O usual JJ
O about IN
I CDs NNS
O since IN
I Friday NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Reports NNS
O from IN
I branches NNS
O are VBP
O that IN
I there EX
O has VBZ
O been VBN
I greater JJR
I interest NN
O in IN
I the DT
I last JJ
I day NN
O or CC
O so RB
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Steven NNP
I Braitman NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I vice NN
I president NN
O at IN
I Chemical NNP
I Bank NNP
O in IN
I New NNP
I York NNP
O <period> <period>
I Chemical NNP
O said VBD
I deposits NNS
B Monday NNP
O were VBD
I about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 5 NN
I million CD
O higher JJR
O than IN
O usual JJ
O and CC
I it PRP
O expects VBZ
I more JJR
I activity NN
O as IN
I investors NNS
O receive VBP
I the DT
I proceeds NNS
O from IN
I sales NNS
O of IN
I stock NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I This DT
O is VBZ
I no DT
I time NN
O to TO
O be VB
O playing VBG
O in IN
I the DT
I street NN
O <period><period><period> =colon=
I the DT
I Dow NNP
O has VBZ
I more JJR
I ups NNS
I and CC
I downs NNS
O than IN
I an DT
I elevator NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O proclaimed VBD
I an DT
I advertisement NN
B Monday NNP
O in IN
I New NNP
I York NNP
I newspapers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O touting VBG
I Lincoln NNP
I Savings NNP
I Bank NNP
B <apost>s POS
I one-year JJ
I CD NNP
O <period> <period>
I Harold NNP
I Jones NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Lincoln NNP
B <apost>s POS
I chief JJ
I retail JJ
I banking NN
I officer NN
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I there EX
O has VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O yet RB
O been VBN
O <quote> <quote>
I a DT
I discernible JJ
I response NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O although IN
I the DT
I ad NN
O included VBD
I a DT
I coupon NN
B that WDT
O could MD
O arrive VB
O later RB
O in IN
I the DT
I week NN
O <period> <period>
I Friday NNP
B <apost>s POS
I market NN
I rout NN
O came VBD
O smack RB
O in IN
I the DT
I middle NN
O of IN
I the DT
I heaviest JJS
I month NN
O for IN
I CD NNP
I rollovers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O when WRB
I a DT
I number NN
O of IN
I banks NNS
I and CC
I thrifts NNS
O already RB
O have VBP
I promotions NNS
O under IN
I way NN
O <period> <period>
I First NNP
I National NNP
I Bank NNP
O of IN
I Boston NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O for IN
I example NN
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
O offering VBG
I certain JJ
I new JJ
I depositors NNS
B an DT
I extra JJ
I quarter NN
O of IN
I a DT
I percentage NN
I point NN
O on IN
I six-month JJ
I and CC
I 12-month JJ
I CDs NNS
O <period> <period>
I Some DT
I banks NNS
O actually RB
O boosted VBD
I yields NNS
O on IN
I the DT
I shortest JJS
I term NN
I CDs NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I latest JJS
I week NN
O <period> <period>
I New NNP
I York NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Citibank NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O for IN
I instance NN
O <comma> <comma>
O increased VBD
I the DT
I yield NN
O on IN
I small-denomination NN
I three-month JJ
I CDs NNS
O to TO
I 8 CD
I <percent> NN
O from IN
I 7<period>9 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
O On IN
I average JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O however RB
O <comma> <comma>
I three-month JJ
I CDs NNS
O at IN
I major JJ
I banks NNS
O are VBP
O yielding VBG
I a DT
I tenth NN
O of IN
I a DT
I percentage NN
I point NN
O less JJR
O than IN
I they PRP
O were VBD
I a DT
I week NN
O ago RB
O <period> <period>
I Average JJ
I yields NNS
O on IN
I CDs NNS
O aimed VBN
O at IN
I individual JJ
I investors NNS
O fell VBD
O less JJR
O than IN
I half NN
I as RB
I much JJ
O as IN
I yields NNS
O on IN
I Treasury NNP
I bills NNS
O sold VBN
O at IN
I Monday NNP
B <apost>s POS
I auction NN
O <period> <period>
I Six-month JJ
I CDs NNS
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 50<comma>000 CD
O and CC
O less JJR
O yielded VBD
I an DT
I average JJ
I 8<period>02 CD
I <percent> NN
O in IN
I the DT
I week NN
O ended VBN
I Tuesday NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O down RB
O from IN
I 8<period>10 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I Banxquote NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I yield NN
O on IN
I six-month JJ
I T-bills NNS
O fell VBD
O to TO
I 7<period>82 CD
I <percent> NN
O on IN
I Monday NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O from IN
I 8<period>01 CD
I <percent> NN
B the DT
I week NN
O before RB
O <period> <period>
O Meanwhile RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I average JJ
I yield NN
O on IN
I six-month JJ
I CDs NNS
O of IN
I more JJR
I than IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 90<comma>000 CD
O fell VBD
O to TO
I 7<period>93 CD
I <percent> NN
O in IN
I the DT
I latest JJS
I week NN
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I Banxquote NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O from IN
I 8<period>10 CD
I <percent> NN
B the DT
I week NN
O before RB
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Mehl NNP
O noted VBD
O that IN
I actual JJ
I rates NNS
O are VBP
O almost RB
O identical JJ
O on IN
I small JJ
I and CC
I large-denomination NN
I CDs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I yields NNS
O on IN
I CDs NNS
O aimed VBN
O at IN
I the DT
I individual JJ
I investor NN
O are VBP
O boosted VBN
O by IN
I more RBR
I frequent JJ
I compounding NN
O <period> <period>
I CDs NNS
O sold VBN
O by IN
I major JJ
I brokerage NN
I houses NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O like IN
I jumbo JJ
I CDs NNS
O tend VBP
O to TO
O closely RB
O follow VB
I interest NN
I rate NN
I trends NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O also RB
O posted VBD
I larger JJR
I drops VBZ
O in IN
I yields NNS
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I six-month JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I broker-sold JJ
I CD NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O for IN
I example NN
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
O yielding VBG
I an DT
I average JJ
I 8<period>09 CD
I <percent> NN
O in IN
I the DT
I latest JJS
I week NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I fifth NN
O of IN
I a DT
I percentage NN
I point NN
O lower JJR
O than IN
I the DT
I week NN
O before RB
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I late JJ
I April NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O when WRB
I interest NN
I rates NNS
O were VBD
O at IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I recent JJ
I highs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I short-term JJ
I CDs NNS
O sold VBN
O by IN
I brokers NNS
O were VBD
O offering NN
I yields NNS
B half PDT
I a DT
I percentage NN
I point NN
O or CC
O more JJR
O higher JJR
O than IN
I banks NNS
O <period> <period>
I CD JJ
I yields NNS
O are VBP
O generally RB
O expected VBN
O to TO
O fall VB
O further JJ
O in IN
I coming VBG
I weeks NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I What WP
O happened VBD
O in IN
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O and CC
I the DT
I bigger JJR
I trade NN
I deficit NN
O <quote> <quote>
O reported VBD
I yesterday NN
O <quote> <quote>
O make VB
I it PRP
O unlikely JJ
O that IN
I short-term JJ
I interest NN
I rates NNS
O will MD
O rise VB
O <quote> <quote>
I any DT
I time NN
O soon RB
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Mehl NNP
O of IN
I Banxquote NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Even RB
O before IN
I the DT
I market NN
I drop NN
O <comma> <comma>
I rates NNS
O were VBD
O down RB
I about IN
I half PDT
I a DT
I percentage NN
I point NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Robert NNP
I J<period> NNP
I Hutchinson NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I senior JJ
I vice NN
I president NN
O for IN
I retail JJ
I marketing NN
O at IN
I Manufacturers NNP
I Hanover NNP
I Trust NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O in IN
I New NNP
I York NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I That DT
O puts VBZ
I pressure NN
O on IN
I CD NNP
I rates NNS
O <period> <period>
I Conservatives NNS
O have VBP
I an DT
I important JJ
I decision NN
O to TO
O make VB
I this DT
I fall NN
O <period> <period>
O At IN
I the DT
I recent JJ
I meetings NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I World NNP
I Bank NNP
I and CC
I International NNP
I Monetary NNP
I Fund NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Bush NNP
I administration NN
O announced VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I intention NN
O to TO
O decide VB
O by IN
I yearend NN
B the DT
I size NN
O of IN
I the DT
I next JJ
I increase NN
O in IN
I the DT
I IMF NNP
B <apost>s POS
I capital NN
I base NN
O <period> <period>
O While IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I share NN
O of IN
I the DT
I increase NN
O probably RB
O will MD
O not RB
O reach VB
I the DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 12 CD
I billion CD
O or CC
O more RBR
O implicit JJ
O in IN
I the DT
I IMF NNP
B <apost>s POS
I request NN
O for IN
I a DT
I doubling NN
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 90 CD
I billion CD
I capital NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I administration NN
O probably RB
O will MD
O agree VB
O to TO
I a DT
I multibillion-dollar JJ
I increase NN
O <period> <period>
I This DT
O would MD
O be VB
O consistent JJ
O with IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I unwavering VBG
I support NN
O for IN
I the DT
I Brady NNP
I Plan NNP
O and CC
I G-7 NNP
I exchange-rate NN
I intervention NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O with IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I financial JJ
I commitment NN
O to TO
I Mexico NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Poland NNP
I and CC
I others NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I IMF NNP
O has VBZ
I several JJ
I reasons NNS
O for IN
O requesting VBG
I the DT
I increase NN
O <period> <period>
I Its PRP<dollar>
I role NN
O in IN
I the DT
I economies NNS
O of IN
I developing VBG
I countries NNS
O has VBZ
O grown VBN
O steadily RB
O since IN
I the DT
I 1970s NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I size NN
I and CC
I pace NN
O of IN
I disbursements NNS
O will MD
O accelerate VB
O further JJ
O under IN
I the DT
I Brady NNP
I Plan NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O promises VBZ
I larger JJR
I and CC
I earlier JJR
I disbursements NNS
O to TO
I approved VBD
I countries NNS
O <period> <period>
I At IN
I least JJS
I three CD
I other JJ
I factors NNS
O have VBP
O encouraged VBN
I the DT
I IMF NNP
O to TO
O insist VB
O on IN
I increased VBN
I capital NN
O <period> <period>
O First RB
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O argues VBZ
O that IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I capital NN
I base NN
O must MD
O be VB
O increased VBN
O in IN
I order NN
O to TO
O maintain VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I size NN
O relative JJ
O to TO
I world NN
I financial JJ
I markets NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O for IN
I which WDT
B it PRP
O feels VBZ
I some DT
I responsibility NN
O <period> <period>
O Second JJ
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I World NNP
I Bank NNP
B <apost>s POS
I recent JJ
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 75 CD
I billion CD
I capital NN
I increase NN
O -- =colon=
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 14 CD
I billion CD
O from IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O -- =colon=
O has VBZ
O left VBN
I the DT
I IMF NNP
O feeling NN
O less JJR
O than IN
I first JJ
I fiddle NN
O among IN
I international JJ
I financial JJ
I institutions NNS
O <period> <period>
O Third NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I IMF NNP
O would MD
O like VB
O to TO
O meet VB
I Japan NNP
B <apost>s POS
I request NN
O for IN
I increased VBN
I ownership NN
O <lparen> <lparen>
I currently RB
I 4<period>5 CD
I <percent> NN
O <rparen> <rparen>
O <period> <period>
I Japan NNP
O has VBZ
O supported VBN
I a DT
I larger JJR
I role NN
O for IN
I the DT
I IMF NNP
O in IN
I developing-country JJ
I debt NN
I issues NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O is VBZ
I an DT
I important JJ
I financial JJ
I resource NN
O for IN
I IMF-guided JJ
I programs NNS
O in IN
I developing VBG
I countries NNS
O <period> <period>
O While IN
I international JJ
I politics NNS
O may MD
O argue VB
O for IN
I the DT
I capital NN
I increase NN
O <comma> <comma>
I there EX
O is VBZ
I a DT
I clear JJ
I economic JJ
I case NN
O against IN
I it PRP
O <period> <period>
I Opponents NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I increase NN
O argue VBP
O that IN
I the DT
I IMF NNP
O practices NNS
I central JJ
I planning NN
O while IN
O supporting VBG
I ineffective JJ
I governments NNS
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O question VBP
O whether IN
I the DT
I IMF NNP
O has VBZ
I any DT
I role NN
O in IN
I developing VBG
I countries NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O given VBN
I its PRP<dollar>
I original JJ
I mandate NN
O to TO
O assist VB
I industrial JJ
I countries NNS
O in IN
I balance-of-payments NNS
I emergencies NNS
O <period> <period>
I Opponents NNS
O show VBP
O that IN
I there EX
O are VBP
O already RB
I more JJR
I funds NNS
O available JJ
O than IN
I commendable JJ
I reform NN
I efforts NNS
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O worry VBP
O that IN
I new JJ
I IMF NNP
I funding NN
O of IN
I developing VBG
I countries NNS
O will MD
O simply RB
O end VB
O up IN
O substituting VBG
I IMF NNP
I debt NN
O for IN
I reschedulable JJ
I commercial JJ
I bank NN
I debt NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I bad JJ
I trade NN
O all DT
O around RB
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O believe VBP
I microeconomics NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O addresses VBZ
I the DT
I problems NNS
O of IN
I markets NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I investment NN
I climate NN
O and CC
I management NN
I practices NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
I the DT
I key JJ
O to TO
I developing-country JJ
I growth NN
O <comma> <comma>
O not RB
I the DT
I IMF NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Keynesian JJ
I focus NN
O on IN
I trade NN
I deficits NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I quarterly JJ
I targets NNS
O and CC
I government NN
I debt NN
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O point VBP
O at IN
I the DT
I numerous JJ
I developing-country JJ
I governments NNS
B that WDT
O have VBP
O inflated JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O taxed VBN
O and CC
O regulated VBN
I themselves PRP
O into IN
I despair NN
O under IN
I successive JJ
I IMF NNP
I programs NNS
O <period> <period>
I Decisions NNS
O on IN
I increases NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I IMF NNP
B <apost>s POS
I capital NN
I base NN
O traditionally RB
O are VBP
O made VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I administration NN
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I subsequent JJ
O authorization NN
O by IN
I Congress NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I last JJ
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I congressional JJ
I authorization NN
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I 1983 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
I a DT
I political JJ
I donnybrook NN
O and CC
O carried VBD
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 6 CD
I billion CD
I housing NN
I program NN
O along IN
O with IN
I it PRP
O to TO
O secure VB
I adequate JJ
I votes NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I politics NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I 1990 CD
I congressional JJ
I authorization NN
O are VBP
O likely JJ
O to TO
O be VB
O similar JJ
O to TO
I those DT
O of IN
I previous JJ
I authorizations NNS
O <period> <period>
I Liberals NNS
O may MD
O support VB
I the DT
I stabilizing VBG
I <comma> <comma>
I quasi-governmental JJ
I role NN
O of IN
I the DT
I IMF NNP
O on IN
I two CD
I conditions NNS
O =colon= =colon=
O that IN
I the DT
I administration NN
O give NN
I assurances NNS
O that IN
I liberal JJ
I Democrats NNPS
B <apost> POS
I support NN
O will MD
O not RB
O be VB
O used VBN
O against IN
I them PRP
O in IN
I congressional JJ
I re-election NN
I campaigns NNS
O <colon> =colon=
O and CC
O that IN
I the DT
I legislation NN
O address NN
O -- =colon=
O with IN
I dollars NNS
O -- =colon=
I social JJ
I and CC
I environmental JJ
I concerns NNS
O <period> <period>
I Conservative NNP
I Republicans NNPS
O will MD
O be VB
O given VBN
I the DT
I choice NN
O of IN
O supporting VBG
O or CC
O fighting VBG
I their PRP<dollar>
I party NN
B <apost>s POS
I popular JJ
I president NN
O in IN
I an DT
I election NN
I year NN
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I decision NN
O to TO
O refuse VB
I the DT
I IMF NNP
B its PRP<dollar>
I capital NN
I increase NN
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
O limit NN
I it PRP
O to TO
I 25 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O would MD
O bring VB
I a DT
I major JJ
I change NN
O in IN
I international JJ
I economic JJ
I policy NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O could MD
O not RB
O be VB
O taken VBN
O lightly RB
O <period> <period>
I Commentators NNS
O would MD
O fret VB
O over IN
I the DT
I implications NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I G-7 NNP
I coordination NN
I process NN
O and CC
I the DT
I stability NN
O of IN
I world NN
I financial JJ
I markets NNS
O <period> <period>
O Because IN
I commercial JJ
I banks NNS
O and CC
I the DT
I developing-country JJ
I governments NNS
O believe VBP
I they PRP
O will MD
O get VB
I a DT
I piece NN
O of IN
I any DT
I capital NN
I increase NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I scaled-down JJ
I IMF NNP
I mission NN
O would MD
O leave VB
I both DT
O feeling NN
O shortchanged VBN
O <period> <period>
O Furthermore RB
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I rejection NN
O of IN
I the DT
I capital NN
I increase NN
O <lparen> <lparen>
O and CC
I transfer NN
O of IN
I shares NNS
O to TO
I Japan NNP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O would MD
O give VB
I Japan NNP
B an DT
I argument NN
O against IN
I future NN
I calls VBZ
O for IN
I economic JJ
I burden-sharing NN
O <period> <period>
O On IN
I the DT
I other JJ
I hand NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I decision NN
O to TO
O increase VB
I the DT
I IMF NNP
B <apost>s POS
I capital NN
O would MD
O reinforce VB
I the DT
I central JJ
I economic JJ
I role NN
O of IN
I multilateral JJ
I institutions NNS
O in IN
I developing VBG
I countries NNS
O <period> <period>
O With IN
I the DT
I increase NN
O <comma> <comma>
I even RB
I more RBR
I developing-country JJ
I energy NN
I and CC
I talent NN
O would MD
O be VB
O diverted VBN
O from IN
O creating VBG
I profitable JJ
I economic JJ
I systems NNS
O to TO
O setting VBG
O up IN
I economic JJ
I planning NN
I ministries NNS
B that WDT
O generate VBP
I IMF-approved JJ
I economic JJ
I plans NNS
O <period> <period>
O Upping VBG
I the DT
I ante NN
O could MD
O slow VB
I economic JJ
I development NN
O even RB
O further RBR
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
I countries NNS
O delay VBP
I market-opening JJ
I steps NNS
O in IN
I anticipation NN
O of IN
I richer JJR
I multilateral JJ
I support NN
O <period> <period>
I Conservatives NNS
O should MD
O take VB
I a DT
I position NN
O prior RB
O to TO
I the DT
I administration NN
B <apost>s POS
I year-end NN
I deadline NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I issues NNS
O are VBP
O too RB
O important JJ
O to TO
O be VB
O left VBN
O to TO
I the DT
I financial JJ
I and CC
I budget NN
I ministries NNS
O fighting VBG
O over IN
I the DT
I size NN
O of IN
I the DT
I capital NN
I increase NN
O <comma> <comma>
O rather RB
O than IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I purpose NN
O <period> <period>
O If IN
I conservatives NNS
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O support VB
I an DT
I increase NN
O in IN
I the DT
I IMF NNP
B <apost>s POS
I capital NN
O <comma> <comma>
O then RB
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O incumbent JJ
O on IN
I them PRP
O to TO
O speak VB
O up IN
O now RB
O and CC
O explain VB
I the DT
I alternative NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Malpass NNP
O directs VBZ
I the DT
I Republican NNP
I staff NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Joint NNP
I Economic NNP
I Committee NNP
O of IN
I Congress NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Chicago NNP
I Mercantile NNP
I Exchange NNP
O fined VBD
O and CC
O suspended VBN
I two CD
I commodities NNS
I traders NNS
O accused VBN
O of IN
O making VBG
I prearranged VBN
I trades NNS
O with IN
I each DT
I other NN
B that IN
O allegedly RB
O cheated VBN
I a DT
I customer NN
O <period> <period>
I Merc NN
I officials NNS
O said VBD
I Gary NNP
I N<period> NNP
I Roberts NNP
O was VBD
O disciplined VBN
O following VBG
I the DT
I exchange NN
B <apost>s POS
I investigation NN
O of IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I trading NN
O in IN
I several JJ
I commodities NNS
I pits NNS
O from IN
I July NNP
O to TO
I November NNP
I 1988 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Merc NNP
O said VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Roberts NNP
O withheld VBD
O from IN
I the DT
I market NN
B certain JJ
I orders NNS
O in IN
I cooperation NN
O with IN
I another DT
I trader NN
O <comma> <comma>
I David NNP
I Stein NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Merc NNP
O fined VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Roberts NNP
B <dollar> <dollar>
I 15<comma>000 CD
O and CC
O suspended VBN
I his PRP<dollar>
I trading NN
I membership NN
O for IN
I three CD
I years NNS
O <period> <period>
O Also RB
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O and CC
I Mr<period> NNP
I Stein NNP
O were VBD
O ordered VBN
O to TO
O make VB
I restitution NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 35<comma>000 CD
O to TO
I a DT
I customer NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Stein NNP
O was VBD
O fined VBN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 25<comma>000 CD
O and CC
O suspended VBN
O for IN
I three CD
I years NNS
O <period> <period>
I Messrs<period> NNP
I Roberts NNP
I and CC
I Stein NNP
O could MD
O n<apost>t RB
O be VB
O reached VBN
O for IN
I comment NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Merc NNP
O said VBD
O that IN
O as IN
I part NN
O of IN
I the DT
I disciplinary JJ
I settlement NN
O <comma> <comma>
I neither DT
I man NN
O admitted VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O nor CC
O denied VBD
I the DT
I alleged VBN
I violations NNS
O <period> <period>
I Neither CC
O was VBD
O among IN
I the DT
I 46 CD
I traders NNS
O indicted VBD
I last JJ
I August NNP
O in IN
I a DT
I federal JJ
I investigation NN
O of IN
I traders NNS
O at IN
O both DT
I the DT
I Merc NNP
O and CC
I the DT
I Chicago NNP
I Board NNP
O of IN
I Trade NNP
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I a DT
I move NN
B that WDT
O could MD
O pose VB
I a DT
I new JJ
I competitive JJ
I challenge NN
O to TO
I Time NNP
I Warner NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
B <apost>s POS
I powerful JJ
I Home NNP
I Box NNP
I Office NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I cable NN
I giant NN
I Tele-Communications NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O agreed VBD
O to TO
O buy VB
I half NN
O of IN
I Showtime NNP
I Networks NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O from IN
I Viacom NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O for IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 225 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I purchase NN
O comes VBZ
O after IN
I nearly RB
I three CD
I years NNS
O of IN
I on-again JJ
I off-again JJ
I talks NNS
O between IN
I TCI NNP
O and CC
I Viacom NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O has VBZ
O also RB
O discussed VBN
I the DT
I sale NN
O of IN
I an DT
I interest NN
O in IN
I Showtime NNP
O with IN
I other JJ
I cable NN
I operators NNS
O <period> <period>
I Showtime NNP
O is VBZ
I a DT
I distant JJ
I No<period> NN
I 2 CD
O to TO
I Home NNP
I Box NNP
I Office NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O in IN
I May NNP
O filed VBD
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>5 CD
I billion CD
I antitrust JJ
I suit NN
O against IN
I Time NNP
I Warner NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O charging VBG
I the DT
I company NN
O and CC
I its PRP<dollar>
I HBO NNP
I and CC
I American NNP
I Television NNP
I cable NN
I units NNS
O with IN
O conspiring VBG
O to TO
O monopolize VB
I the DT
I pay NN
I TV NN
I business NN
O <period> <period>
I HBO NNP
O has VBZ
I close RB
I to TO
I 24 CD
I million CD
I subscribers NNS
O to TO
I its PRP<dollar>
I HBO NNP
I and CC
I Cinemax NNP
I networks NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O while IN
I Showtime NNP
O and CC
I its PRP<dollar>
I sister NN
I service NN
O <comma> <comma>
I The DT
I Movie NNP
I Channel NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O have VBP
I only RB
I about IN
I 10 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I Paul NNP
I Kagan NNP
I Associates NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Carmel NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Calif<period> NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I research NN
I firm NN
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I TCI NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I investment NN
O in IN
I Showtime NNP
O puts VBZ
I it PRP
O in IN
I an DT
I unusual JJ
I position NN
O <colon> =colon=
O as IN
I the DT
I largest JJS
I cable NN
I operator NN
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I control NN
O of IN
I close RB
I to TO
I 12 CD
I million CD
O of IN
I the DT
I nation NN
B <apost>s POS
I 52 CD
I million CD
I cable NN
I subscribers NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I TCI NNP
O is VBZ
I HBO NNP
B <apost>s POS
I largest JJS
I customer NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I TCI NNP
I President NNP
I John NNP
I Malone NNP
O has VBZ
O long RB
O been VBN
O concerned VBN
O about IN
I HBO NNP
B <apost>s POS
I dominance NN
O of IN
I the DT
I pay NN
I TV NN
I business NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O eager JJ
O to TO
O keep VB
I Showtime NNP
O as IN
I a DT
I healthy JJ
I competitor NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I It PRP
O is VBZ
O important JJ
O to TO
I the DT
I cable NN
I industry NN
O that IN
I we PRP
O have VBP
I a DT
I vibrant JJ
I and CC
I competitive JJ
I pay-television NN
I marketplace NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Malone NNP
O said VBD
O in IN
I a DT
I statement NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I a DT
I telephone NN
I interview NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Robert NNP
I Thomson NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I TCI NNP
I senior JJ
I vice NN
I president NN
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I Showtime NNP
B <apost>s POS
I suit NN
O against IN
I HBO NNP
O <quote> <quote>
O does VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O involve VB
I us PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I nothing NN
B we PRP
O <apost>re VBP
O doing VBG
O here RB
O bears VBZ
I any DT
I relationship NN
O to TO
I that DT
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I He PRP
O added VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O intend VB
O to TO
O be VB
O drawn VBN
O into IN
I it PRP
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O noting VBG
O that IN
I TCI NNP
O wo MD
O n<apost>t RB
O play VB
I any DT
I active JJ
I role NN
O in IN
I the DT
I management NN
O of IN
I Showtime NNP
O <period> <period>
O Linking VBG
O up IN
I Showtime NNP
O with IN
I the DT
I largest JJS
I cable NN
I operator NN
O in IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O could MD
O sharply RB
O boost VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I subscribers NNS
O <period> <period>
I TCI NNP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O may MD
O bring VB
O in IN
I other JJ
I cable NN
I operators NNS
O as IN
I investors NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I practice NN
B it PRP
O has VBZ
O employed VBN
O in IN
I the DT
I past NN
O with IN
I investments NNS
O in IN
I other JJ
I cable NN
I networks NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O such JJ
O as IN
I The DT
I Discovery NNP
I Channel NNP
O <period> <period>
I Additional JJ
I cable NN
I partners NNS
O could MD
O boost VB
I subscribers NNS
O even RB
O further JJ
O <period> <period>
I Time NNP
I Warner NNP
O declined VBD
I comment VB
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I addition NN
O to TO
O owning VBG
I HBO NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Time NNP
I Warner NNP
O owns VBZ
I American NNP
I Television NNP
I <amp> CC
I Communications NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I nation NN
B <apost>s POS
I second JJ
I largest JJS
I cable NN
I operator NN
O after IN
I TCI NNP
O <period> <period>
I Viacom NNP
O also RB
O owns VBZ
I cable NN
I systems NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I it PRP
O is VBZ
I the DT
I 14th JJ
I largest JJS
I operator NN
O of IN
I such JJ
I systems NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I less JJR
I than IN
I one CD
I million CD
I subscribers NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I TCI NNP
I investment NN
O is VBZ
I a DT
I big JJ
I victory NN
O for IN
I Viacom NNP
B <apost>s POS
I chief JJ
I executive JJ
I officer NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Frank NNP
I Biondi NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Winston NNP
I H<period> NNP
I Cox NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I president NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Showtime NNP
I unit NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I This DT
O takes VBZ
I any DT
I question NN
O of IN
I Showtime NNP
B <apost>s POS
I viability NN
O and CC
O puts VBZ
I it PRP
O away RB
O once RB
O and CC
O for IN
I all DT
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Biondi NNP
O said VBD
O in IN
I a DT
I telephone NN
I interview NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I fight NN
O between IN
I HBO NNP
O and CC
I Showtime NNP
O is VBZ
O particularly RB
O acrimonious JJ
O because IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Biondi NNP
O is VBZ
I the DT
I former JJ
I chief JJ
I executive NN
O of IN
I HBO NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I Mr<period> NNP
I Cox NNP
O served VBD
O as IN
I chief NN
O of IN
I marketing NN
O for IN
I the DT
I service NN
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O were VBD
O both DT
O hired VBN
O by IN
I Sumner NNP
I Redstone NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Boston NNP
I billionaire NN
B who WP
O took VBD
I control NN
O of IN
I Viacom NNP
B three CD
I years NNS
O ago RB
O in IN
I a DT
I leveraged JJ
I buy-out NN
O <period> <period>
I Time NNP
I Warner NNP
O has VBZ
O vigorously RB
O denied VBN
I all DT
O of IN
I Viacom NNP
B <apost>s POS
I allegations NNS
O <period> <period>
I Boeing NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O already RB
O struck VBN
O by IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I Machinists NNS
I union NN
O <comma> <comma>
O briefly NN
O called VBN
O off IN
I contract NN
I talks NNS
O with IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I engineers NNS
O and CC
O labeled VBN
I their PRP<dollar>
I demands NNS
O <quote> <quote>
O grossly RB
O excessive JJ
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Later RB
O <comma> <comma>
O however RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I company NN
O agreed VBD
O to TO
O meet VB
O on IN
I Monday NNP
O with IN
I the DT
I Seattle NNP
I Professional NNP
I Engineering NNP
I Employees NNP
I Association NNP
O after IN
I a DT
I federal JJ
I mediator NN
O intervened VBD
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I the DT
I union NN
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I spokesman NN
O for IN
I the DT
I engineers NNS
O said VBD
I the DT
I company NN
O asked VBD
I the DT
I union NN
O to TO
O reduce VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I demands NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O included VBD
I a DT
I 19 CD
I <percent> NN
I pay NN
I hike NN
O in IN
I the DT
I first JJ
I year NN
O and CC
I 8 CD
I <percent> NN
O in IN
I the DT
I second JJ
I and CC
I third JJ
I years NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I union NN
O represents VBZ
I about IN
I 28<comma>000 CD
I engineers NNS
I and CC
I technical JJ
I workers NNS
O <period> <period>
I Its PRP<dollar>
I contract NN
O expires VBZ
I Dec<period> NNP
I 1 CD
O <period> <period>
O Meanwhile RB
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I federal JJ
I mediator NN
O is VBZ
O scheduled VBN
O to TO
O meet VB
I today NN
O with IN
I Boeing NNP
I officials NNS
O and CC
I representatives NNS
O of IN
I 55<comma>000 CD
I striking JJ
I Machinists NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I It PRP
O will MD
O take VB
I several JJ
I meetings NNS
O to TO
O resolve VB
I this DT
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I a DT
I spokesman NN
O for IN
I the DT
I Machinists NNS
I union NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O want VB
O to TO
O bring VB
O back JJ
I something NN
B the DT
I members NNS
O will MD
O reject VB
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Machinists NNS
O already RB
O have VBP
O rejected VBN
I a DT
I package NN
B that WDT
O would MD
O have VB
O provided VBN
I a DT
I 10 CD
I <percent> NN
I pay NN
I raise NN
O plus CC
I bonuses NNS
O over IN
I the DT
I three-year JJ
I life NN
O of IN
I the DT
I contract NN
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O also RB
O would MD
O have VB
O reduced VBN
I mandatory JJ
I overtime NN
O <period> <period>
I Investor NNP
I Asher NNP
I Edelman NNP
O increased VBD
I his PRP<dollar>
I stake NN
O in IN
I Intelogic NNP
I Trace NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O and CC
O cleared VBD
I the DT
I way NN
O for IN
I additional JJ
I purchases NNS
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O was VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O clear JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O however RB
O <comma> <comma>
O whether IN
I the DT
I actions NNS
O were VBD
O related VBN
O to TO
I a DT
I battle NN
O between IN
I the DT
I corporate JJ
I raider NN
O and CC
I New NNP
I York NNP
I attorney NN
I Martin NNP
I Ackerman NNP
O for IN
I control NN
O of IN
I Datapoint NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I San NNP
I Antonio NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Texas-based JJ
I data-processing NN
I systems NNS
I maker NN
O <period> <period>
I Intelogic NNP
I Trace NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I computer NN
I services NNS
I company NN
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
O spun VBN
O off IN
O to TO
I Datapoint NNP
I holders NNS
O in IN
I 1985 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O after IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Edelman NNP
O gained VBD
I control NN
O <period> <period>
O After IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Ackerman NNP
O announced VBD
I he PRP
O was VBD
O soliciting VBG
I consents NNS
O from IN
I shareholders NNS
O in IN
I order NN
O to TO
O wrest VB
I control NN
O of IN
I Datapoint NNP
O from IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Edelman NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I corporate JJ
I raider NN
O purchased VBN
I 30 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I Datapoint NNP
B <apost>s POS
I shares NNS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I a DT
I Securities NNP
I and CC
I Exchange NNP
I Commission NNP
I filing NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Edelman NNP
O said VBD
O from IN
I Sept<period> NNP
I 29 CD
O to TO
I Oct<period> NNP
I 13 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O acquired VBD
I 309<comma>500 CD
I shares NNS
O of IN
I Intelogic NNP
I common JJ
I shares NNS
O for IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>25 CD
I to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>375 CD
B each DT
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I purchases NNS
O increased VBD
I his PRP<dollar>
I stake NN
O to TO
I 16<period>2 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I the DT
I shares NNS
O outstanding JJ
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I filing NN
O also RB
O said VBD
I certain JJ
I provisions NNS
B which WDT
O apply VBP
O to TO
I persons NNS
O acquiring VBG
I 20 CD
I <percent> NN
I or CC
I more JJR
O of IN
I Intelogic NNP
I common JJ
I stock NN
O <comma> <comma>
O were VBD
O waived VBN
O by IN
I Intelogic NNP
O for IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Edelman NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O is VBZ
I chairman NN
O of IN
I the DT
I company NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Edelman NNP
O could MD
O n<apost>t RB
O be VB
O reached VBN
O for IN
I comment NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I federal JJ
I government NN
O should MD
O make VB
I free JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I voluntary JJ
I testing NN
O for IN
I the DT
I AIDS NNP
I virus NN
B the DT
I cornerstone NN
O of IN
I an DT
I expanded VBN
I campaign NN
O to TO
O stop VB
I the DT
I spread NN
O of IN
I acquired VBN
I immune JJ
I deficiency NN
I syndrome NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Hudson NNP
I Institute NNP
O recommended VBD
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O By IN
O encouraging VBG
I massive JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I routine JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I voluntary JJ
I testing NN
B we PRP
O can MD
O enable VB
I society NN
O to TO
O voluntarily RB
O segregate VB
I itself PRP
O sexually RB
O into IN
I two CD
I groups NNS
O =colon= =colon=
I those DT
B who WP
O carry VBP
I the DT
I virus NN
O and CC
I those DT
B who WP
O do VBP
O not RB
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I the DT
I Indianapolis NNP
I research NN
I organization NN
O said VBD
O in IN
I a DT
I new JJ
I report NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I report NN
O takes VBZ
I a DT
I more RBR
I alarmed VBN
I view NN
O of IN
I AIDS NNP
O and CC
O recommends VBZ
I a DT
I more JJR
I sweeping VBG
I response NN
O than IN
I many JJ
I other JJ
I analyses NNS
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O warns VBZ
O that IN
I the DT
I AIDS NNP
I epidemic NN
O <quote> <quote>
O may MD
O reduce VB
I the DT
I rate NN
O of IN
I growth NN
O of IN
I the DT
I work NN
I force NN
O <comma> <comma>
O curb VB
I productivity NN
I gains NNS
O and CC
O slow JJ
I economic JJ
I growth NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I It PRP
O contends VBZ
O that IN
I current JJ
I government NN
I policy NN
O is VBZ
O failing VBG
O to TO
O stem VB
I the DT
I AIDS NNP
I epidemic NN
O because IN
I it PRP
O suggests VBZ
I the DT
I use NN
O of IN
I condoms NNS
O can MD
O make VB
I sex NN
O <quote> <quote>
O safe JJ
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O But CC
I the DT
I report NN
O says VBZ
O =colon= =colon=
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I only RB
I safe JJ
I sex NN
O is VBZ
I sex NN
O between IN
I uninfected JJ
I partners NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O and CC
I testing NN
O is VBZ
I the DT
I only JJ
I way NN
O to TO
O learn VB
O of IN
I infection NN
O <period> <period>
I Hudson NNP
B <apost>s POS
I researchers NNS
O estimated VBN
O that IN
I it PRP
O would MD
O cost VB
I less JJR
I than IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 650 CD
I million CD
B a DT
I year NN
O to TO
O test VB
I the DT
I entire JJ
I population NN
O between IN
I the DT
I ages NNS
O of IN
I 12 CD
I and CC
I 65 CD
I years NNS
O old JJ
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I addition NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I report NN
O recommends VBZ
O that IN
I federal JJ
I and CC
I state NN
I governments NNS
O provide VBP
I free JJ
I treatment NN
O to TO
I all DT
B who WP
O test VBP
O positive JJ
O <period> <period>
I An DT
I unexpectedly RB
I sharp JJ
I widening NN
O in IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I trade NN
I gap NN
O for IN
I August NNP
O dragged VBD
I the DT
I dollar NN
O lower JJR
I Tuesday NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I profit-taking NN
O on IN
I short JJ
I positions NNS
O helped VBD
I the DT
I currency NN
O rebound NN
O to TO
O close VB
O mixed VBN
O against IN
I major JJ
I counterparts NNS
O <period> <period>
O While IN
I the DT
I market NN
O kept VBD
I careful JJ
I tabs NNS
O on IN
I Wall NNP
I Street NNP
B <apost>s POS
I gyrations NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O shrugged VBD
O off IN
I a DT
I modest JJ
I downturn NN
O in IN
I equities NNS
O to TO
O bid VB
I the DT
I dollar NN
O well RB
O above IN
I the DT
I day NN
B <apost>s POS
I lows NNS
O <period> <period>
O Soon RB
O after IN
I the DT
I release NN
O of IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I trade NN
I figures NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I dollar NN
O plunged VBD
O to TO
I an DT
I intraday JJ
I low NN
O of IN
I 140<period>95 CD
I yen NN
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O also RB
O declined VBD
O against IN
I the DT
I mark NN
O but CC
O did VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O reach VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I intraday JJ
I low NN
O of IN
I 1<period>8435 CD
I marks NNS
O until IN
I two CD
I hours NNS
O later RB
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I unit NN
O stabilized VBN
I about IN
I midday NN
B New NNP
I York NNP
I time NN
O at IN
I around IN
I 1<period>85 CD
I marks NNS
O and CC
I 141 CD
I yen NN
O <comma> <comma>
O prompting VBG
I unconfirmed JJ
I rumors NNS
O that IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I Federal NNP
I Reserve NNP
O had VBD
O intervened VBN
O to TO
O blunt VB
I the DT
I unit NN
B <apost>s POS
I tumble NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I dollar NN
O finished VBD
O at IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I intraday JJ
I highs NNS
O <period> <period>
I Dealers NNS
O noted VBD
O that IN
I the DT
I foreign JJ
I exchange NN
I market NN
B <apost>s POS
I initial JJ
I bearish JJ
I reaction NN
O to TO
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I trade NN
I figures NNS
O was VBD
O tempered VBN
O later RB
O by IN
I a DT
I <quote> <quote>
I calmer JJR
I reassessment NN
O of IN
I the DT
I data NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I Commerce NNP
I Department NNP
O reported VBD
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 10<period>77 CD
I billion CD
I deficit NN
O in IN
I August NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O compared VBN
O with IN
I a DT
I revised VBN
I July NNP
I deficit NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 8<period>24 CD
I billion CD
O <period> <period>
I Economists NNS
O had VBD
O expected VBN
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 9<period>1 CD
I billion CD
I gap NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I August NNP
I figure NN
O reflected VBD
I a DT
I 6<period>4 CD
I <percent> NN
I rise NN
O in IN
I imports NNS
O and CC
I a DT
I 0<period>2 CD
I <percent> NN
I drop NN
O in IN
I exports NNS
O <period> <period>
I Marc NNP
I M<period> NNP
I Goloven NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I economist NN
O with IN
I Manufacturers NNP
I Hanover NNP
I Trust NNP
O in IN
I New NNP
I York NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
O that IN
O while IN
I the DT
I figures NNS
O appear VBP
O to TO
O indicate VB
I a DT
I sadly RB
I deteriorating VBG
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I trade NN
I performance NN
O <comma> <comma>
I there EX
O <apost>s VBZ
O still RB
I enough RB
I positive JJ
I news NN
O in IN
I the DT
I data NNS
O to TO
O justify VB
O buying VBG
I dollars NNS
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O said VBD
O that IN
O while IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I trade NN
I gap NN
O with IN
I Canada NNP
O has VBZ
O widened VBN
O significantly RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I trade NN
I deficit NN
O with IN
I Western NNP
I Europe NNP
O and CC
I Japan NNP
O continues VBZ
O to TO
O narrow VB
O <period> <period>
O And CC
I he PRP
O added VBD
O that WDT
I manufactured VBD
I goods NNS
I exports NNS
O are VBP
O still RB
O rising VBG
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I dollar NN
B <apost>s POS
I near-term JJ
I path NN
O remains VBZ
O foggy JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I currencny NN
I analysts NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O characterize VBP
I the DT
I market NN
O as IN
O <quote> <quote>
O bewildering VBG
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O In IN
I late JJ
I New NNP
I York NNP
I trading NN
B yesterday NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I dollar NN
O was VBD
O quoted VBN
O at IN
I 1<period>8667 CD
I marks NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O down RB
O from IN
I 1<period>8685 CD
I marks NNS
B late JJ
I Monday NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O at IN
I 142<period>75 CD
I yen NN
O <comma> <comma>
O up IN
O from IN
I 141<period>85 CD
I yen NN
B late JJ
I Monday NNP
O <period> <period>
I Sterling NNP
O was VBD
O unchanged JJ
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>5753 CD
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I Tokyo NNP
B Wednesday NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I currency NN
O opened VBD
O for IN
I trading NN
O at IN
I 142<period>55 CD
I yen NN
O <comma> <comma>
O unchanged JJ
O from IN
I Tuesday NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Tokyo NNP
I close NN
O <period> <period>
O Later RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I currency NN
O fell VBD
O to TO
I about IN
I 142<period>25 CD
I yen NN
O on IN
I news NN
I reports NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I San NNP
I Francisco NNP
I earthquake NN
O <period> <period>
I Some DT
I analysts NNS
O remain VBP
O bullish JJ
O and CC
O point NN
O out RP
O that IN
I the DT
I dollar NN
O continues VBZ
O to TO
O be VB
O well JJ
O bid NN
O despite IN
I key JJ
I rate NN
I increases NNS
O in IN
I Europe NNP
I and CC
I Japan NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I several JJ
I weeks NNS
O of IN
I aggressive JJ
I dollar NN
I sales NNS
O by IN
I the DT
I world NN
I central JJ
I banks NNS
O -- =colon=
I some DT
I traders NNS
O estimate VBP
O that IN
I the DT
I barrage NN
O of IN
I sales NNS
O topped VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 12 CD
I billion CD
O -- =colon=
O and CC
I a DT
I 190-point JJ
I plunge NN
O on IN
I the DT
I New NNP
I York NNP
I Stock NNP
I Exchange NNP
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O note VBP
O that IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I unit NN
O is VBZ
O trading VBG
O at IN
I the DT
I upper JJ
I end NN
O of IN
I the DT
I presumed VBN
I target NN
I zones NNS
O established VBN
O by IN
O the DT
I Group NNP
O of IN
I Seven CD
O trading NN
O partners NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I G-7 NNP
O comprises VBZ
I West NNP
I Germany NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I France NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I U<period>K<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Italy NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Canada NNP
O and CC
I Japan NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I so-called NNP
I Louvre NNP
I accord NN
O was VBD
O seen VBN
O to TO
O have VB
O set VBN
I ranges NNS
O of IN
I 1<period>70 CD
I marks NNS
O to TO
I 1<period>90 CD
I marks NNS
O and CC
I 120 CD
I yen NN
O to TO
I 140 CD
I yen NN
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O say VBP
O that IN
I the DT
I recent JJ
I injection NN
O of IN
I liquidity NN
O into IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I banking NN
I system NN
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O modest JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I they PRP
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O anticipate VB
I significant JJ
I easing NN
O by IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I Federal NNP
I Reserve NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Fed NNP
O arranged VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>5 CD
I billion CD
O of IN
I customer NN
I repurchase NN
I agreements NNS
B Tuesday NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I second JJ
I repurchase NN
I agreement NN
O in IN
I two CD
I days NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I move NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O injects VBZ
I capital NN
O into IN
I the DT
I system NN
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
O seen VBN
O as IN
I an DT
I effort NN
O to TO
O reassure VB
I the DT
I finanicial JJ
I markets NNS
O that IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I central JJ
I bank NN
O is VBZ
O ready JJ
O to TO
O provide VB
I the DT
I ample JJ
I liquidity NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I other JJ
I analysts NNS
O contend VBP
O that IN
O while IN
I the DT
I Fed NNP
B <apost>s POS
I move NN
O to TO
O loosen VB
I credit NN
O has VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O been VBN
O aggressive JJ
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O nevertheless RB
O sends VBZ
I a DT
I clear JJ
I signal NN
O that IN
O <comma> <comma>
O at IN
O least JJS
O for IN
I now RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Fed NNP
O has VBZ
O relaxed VBN
I its PRP<dollar>
I grip NN
O on IN
I credit NN
O <period> <period>
I They PRP
O add VBP
O that IN
I the DT
I Fed NNP
O has VBZ
O allowed VBN
I the DT
I key JJ
I federal JJ
I funds NNS
I interest VBP
I rate NN
O to TO
O dip VB
O to TO
I about IN
I 8 CD
I 5<bslash><fslash>8 CD
I <percent> NN
O from IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I levels NNS
O of IN
I just RB
I below IN
I 9 CD
I <percent> NN
B last JJ
I week NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I federal JJ
I funds NNS
I rate NN
O is VBZ
I the DT
I overnight JJ
I lending NN
I rate NN
B that IN
B banks NNS
O charge VBP
I each DT
I other NN
O <period> <period>
I Market NN
I participants NNS
O said VBD
O that IN
I the DT
I mark NN
O continues VBZ
O to TO
O post VB
I the DT
I most RBS
I significant JJ
I gains NNS
O against IN
I the DT
I dollar NN
O <period> <period>
O On IN
I the DT
I Commodity NNP
I Exchange NNP
O in IN
I New NNP
I York NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I gold NN
O for IN
I current JJ
I delivery NN
O settled VBD
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 367<period>40 CD
B an DT
I ounce NN
O <comma> <comma>
O up IN
I 10 CD
I cents NNS
O <period> <period>
I Estimated VBN
I volume NN
O was VBD
I a DT
I moderate JJ
I 3<period>5 CD
I million CD
I ounces NNS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I early JJ
I trading NN
O in IN
I Hong NNP
I Kong NNP
B Wednesday NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I gold NN
O was VBD
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 366<period>55 CD
B an DT
I ounce NN
O <period> <period>
I National NNP
I Semiconductor NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O settled VBD
I a DT
I four-year-old JJ
I patent NN
I infringement NN
I case NN
O against IN
I Linear NNP
I Technology NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O by IN
O accepting VBG
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 3 CD
I million CD
I payment NN
O from IN
I Linear NNP
O in IN
I exchange NN
O for IN
O granting VBG
I Linear NNP
B irrevocable JJ
I licenses NNS
O for IN
I all DT
I products NNS
O involved VBN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I two CD
I companies NNS
O also RB
O agreed VBD
O to TO
O settle VB
I any DT
I future NN
I property NN
I rights NNS
I issues NNS
O over IN
I the DT
I next JJ
I 10 CD
I years NNS
O through IN
I binding NN
I arbitration NN
O <comma> <comma>
I both DT
I companies NNS
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I products NNS
O are VBP
I so-called JJ
I analog NN
I integrated VBN
I circuits NNS
B that WDT
O have VBP
I applications NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I consumer NN
I electronics NNS
I <comma> <comma>
I automobile NN
I and CC
I electronic JJ
I instrumentation NN
I markets NNS
O <period> <period>
I Linear NNP
I Technology NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Milpitas NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Calif<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O called VBD
I the DT
I settlement NN
O <quote> <quote>
O positive JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O since IN
I products NNS
O covered VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I disputed VBN
I patents NNS
O account VBP
O for IN
I about IN
I 20 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I annual JJ
I sales NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I electronics NNS
I concern VBP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O already RB
O has VBZ
O paid VBN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2 CD
I million CD
O of IN
I the DT
I settlement NN
O to TO
I National NNP
I Semiconductor NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Santa NNP
I Clara NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Calif<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O will MD
O pay VB
I the DT
I remaining VBG
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I equal JJ
I installments NNS
O over IN
I the DT
I next JJ
I eight CD
I quarters NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I payments NNS
O are VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O expected VBN
O to TO
O have VB
I an DT
I impact NN
O on IN
I coming VBG
I operating VBG
I results NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Linear NNP
O added VBD
O <period> <period>
I NBC NNP
B <apost>s POS
I winning VBG
I streak NN
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O canceled VBN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I National NNP
I Broadcasting NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I unit NN
O of IN
I General NNP
I Electric NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O had VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I record-breaking JJ
I 68-week JJ
I reign NN
O as IN
I the DT
I prime-time JJ
I ratings NNS
I leader NN
O snapped VBD
I yesterday NN
O by IN
I ABC-TV NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I subsidiary NN
O of IN
I Capital NNP
I Cities<bslash><fslash>ABC NNP
I Inc NNP
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I the DT
I ratings NNS
O compiled VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I A<period>C<period> NNP
I Nielsen NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I ABC NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O broadcast NN
I the DT
I World NNP
I Series NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O topped VBD
I the DT
I competition NN
O with IN
I a DT
I 14<period>8 CD
I rating NN
I and CC
I 25 CD
I share NN
O <period> <period>
I NBC NNP
O was VBD
O second JJ
O with IN
I a DT
I 13<period>9 CD
I rating NN
I and CC
I 24 CD
I share NN
O followed VBN
O by IN
I CBS NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
B <apost>s POS
I television NN
I network NN
O with IN
I a DT
I 12<period>5 CD
I rating NN
I and CC
I 21 CD
I share NN
O <period> <period>
O <lparen> <lparen>
I A DT
I ratings NNS
I point VBP
O represents VBZ
I 904<comma>000 CD
I television NN
I households NNS
O <colon> =colon=
I shares NNS
O indicate VBP
I the DT
I percentage NN
O of IN
I sets NNS
O in IN
I use NN
O <period> <period>
O <rparen> <rparen>
I The DT
I first JJ
I two CD
I games NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I World NNP
I Series NNP
O between IN
I the DT
I Oakland NNP
I Athletics NNP
I and CC
I San NNP
I Francisco NNP
I Giants NNP
O did VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O finish VB
O in IN
I the DT
I top JJ
I 10 CD
O <colon> =colon=
O instead RB
I they PRP
O landed VBD
O in IN
I 16th JJ
I and CC
I 18th JJ
I place NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I highest-rated JJ
I show NN
O continues VBZ
O to TO
O be VB
I ABC NNP
B <apost>s POS
I <quote> <quote>
I Roseanne NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I NBC NNP
O had VBD
I five CD
O of IN
I the DT
I top JJ
I 10 CD
O shows VBZ
O <colon> =colon=
I ABC NNP
O had VBD
I four CD
O and CC
I CBS NNP
O had VBD
I one CD
O <period> <period>
I CBS NNP
O held VBD
I the DT
I previous JJ
I record NN
O for IN
I consecutive JJ
I No<period> NN
I 1 CD
I victories NNS
O -- =colon=
I 46 CD
I weeks NNS
O -- =colon=
O during IN
I the DT
I 1962-63 CD
I season NN
O <period> <period>
I Procter NNP
I <amp> CC
I Gamble NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Cincinnati NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O expanding VBG
I its PRP<dollar>
I presence NN
O in IN
I the DT
I food NN
I service NN
I market NN
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I it PRP
O acquired VBD
I Maryland NNP
I Club NNP
I Foods NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I coffee NN
I supplier NN
O <comma> <comma>
O from IN
I an DT
I investor NN
I group NN
O led VBN
O by IN
I F<period> NNP
I Philip NNP
I Handy NNP
O of IN
I Winter NNP
I Park NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Fla NNP
O <period> <period>
I Terms NNS
O were VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O disclosed VBN
O <period> <period>
I Houston-based NNP
I Maryland NNP
I Club NNP
I Foods NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O had VBD
I sales NNS
O of IN
I about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 200 CD
I million CD
B last JJ
I year NN
O <comma> <comma>
O sells VBZ
I coffee NN
O under IN
I the DT
I Maryland NNP
I Club NNP
I and CC
I Butter-Nut NNP
I brands NNS
O to TO
I restaurants NNS
I <comma> <comma>
I hotels NNS
I <comma> <comma>
I offices NNS
I and CC
I airlines NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I acquisition NN
O <quote> <quote>
O gives VBZ
I us PRP
B additional JJ
I production NN
I capacity NN
O for IN
I the DT
I food NN
I service NN
I coffee NN
I business NN
O and CC
I a DT
I stronger JJR
I distribution NN
I network NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I a DT
I P<amp>G NNP
I spokesman NN
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I P<amp>G NNP
O already RB
O sells VBZ
I its PRP<dollar>
I Folgers NNP
I ground NN
I roast NN
I coffee NN
O to TO
I food NN
I service NN
I concerns NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O not RB
O to TO
I as IN
I many JJ
I markets NNS
O as IN
I Maryland NNP
I Club NNP
O <period> <period>
O For IN
I example NN
O <comma> <comma>
I P<amp>G NNP
O up IN
O until IN
I now RB
O has VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O sold VBN
I coffee NN
O to TO
I airlines NNS
O and CC
O does VBZ
I only RB
I limited JJ
I business NN
O with IN
I hotels NNS
O and CC
I large JJ
I restaurant NN
I chains NNS
O <period> <period>
I Maryland NNP
I Club NNP
O also RB
O distributes VBZ
I tea NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O fits VBZ
O well RB
O with IN
I P<amp>G NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Tender NN
I Leaf NN
I brand NN
I <comma> <comma>
I and CC
I hot JJ
I cocoa NN
I products NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I company NN
O said VBD
I the DT
I acquisition NN
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O completed VBN
O and CC
O reviewed VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I Federal NNP
I Trade NNP
I Commission NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I purchase NN
O includes VBZ
I a DT
I coffee-roasting JJ
I plant NN
O in IN
I Omaha NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Neb<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I a DT
I leased VBN
I facility NN
O in IN
I Houston NNP
O <period> <period>
I MACMILLAN NNP
I BLOEDEL NNP
I Ltd<period> NNP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O borrowed VBD
I 215 CD
I million CD
I Dutch JJ
I guilders NNS
O <lparen> <lparen>
I US<dollar> <dollar>
I 102 CD
I million CD
O <rparen> <rparen>
O from IN
I a DT
I group NN
O of IN
I Dutch JJ
I institutional JJ
I investors NNS
O <period> <period>
I MacMillan NNP
I Bloedel NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Vancouver NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I British NNP
I Columbia NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I forest NN
I products NNS
I concern VBP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I the DT
I 8<period>1 CD
I <percent> NN
I loan NN
O is VBZ
O due JJ
I Oct<period> NNP
I 16 CD
I <comma> <comma>
I 1996 CD
O <period> <period>
I Funds NNS
O will MD
O be VB
O used VBN
O to TO
O repay VB
I existing VBG
I short-term JJ
I debt NN
O and CC
O to TO
O finance VB
I capital NN
I spending NN
O <comma> <comma>
I it PRP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I President NNP
I Bush NNP
O will MD
O veto VB
I a DT
I bill NN
O funding VBG
I the DT
I Departments NNPS
O of IN
I Labor NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Education NNP
O and CC
I Health NNP
I and CC
I Human NNP
I Services NNP
O because IN
I it PRP
O would MD
O allow VB
I federal JJ
I funding NN
O of IN
I abortions NNS
O for IN
I victims NNS
O of IN
I rape NN
I and CC
I incest NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I White NNP
I House NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Bush NNP
O had VBD
O threatened VBN
I a DT
I veto NN
O previously RB
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I he PRP
O put VBP
O off IN
I a DT
I firm NN
I decision NN
O while IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I aides NNS
I and CC
I legislators NNS
O searched VBD
O for IN
I a DT
I compromise NN
B that WDT
O would MD
O tighten VB
I requirements NNS
O for IN
I such JJ
I abortions NNS
O in IN
I a DT
I way NN
O acceptable JJ
O to TO
I the DT
I president NN
O <period> <period>
I White NNP
I House NNP
I Press NNP
I Secretary NNP
I Marlin NNP
I Fitzwater NNP
O said VBD
I negotiations NNS
O between IN
I Bush NNP
I aides NNS
O and CC
I lawmakers NNS
O ended VBD
I Monday NNP
O without IN
I success NN
O <period> <period>
I Most JJS
I lawmakers NNS
O think VBP
I it PRP
O will MD
O be VB
O extremely RB
O difficult JJ
O for IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Bush NNP
B <apost>s POS
I opponents NNS
O on IN
I the DT
I abortion NN
I issue NN
O to TO
O round VB
O up IN
I the DT
I votes NNS
O needed VBN
O to TO
O override VB
I the DT
I veto NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I there EX
O still RB
O may MD
O be VB
I prolonged VBN
I debate NN
O and CC
I political JJ
I maneuvering NN
B that WDT
O holds VBZ
O up IN
I the DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 156<period>7 CD
I billion CD
I funding NN
I bill NN
O for IN
I the DT
I fiscal JJ
I year NN
B that WDT
O began VBD
I Oct<period> NNP
I 1 CD
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Bush NNP
O has VBZ
O said VBD
I he PRP
O personally RB
O approves VBZ
O of IN
I abortions NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I cases NNS
O of IN
I rape NN
O <comma> <comma>
I incest NN
O and CC
I danger NN
O to TO
I the DT
I life NN
O of IN
I the DT
I mother NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I he PRP
O has VBZ
O opposed VBN
I Medicaid NNP
I funding NN
O of IN
I abortions NNS
O for IN
I poor JJ
I women NNS
B who WP
O say VBP
I they PRP
O are VBP
I victims NNS
O of IN
I rape NN
I and CC
I incest NN
O <comma> <comma>
O arguing VBG
O that IN
I those DT
I exceptions NNS
O are VBP
O enforced VBN
O so RB
O loosely RB
O that IN
I they PRP
O open VB
I the DT
I way NN
O for IN
I abortions NNS
O for IN
I other JJ
I women NNS
O <period> <period>
I NEWSPAPERS NNS
I =colon= =colon=
I Media NNP
I General NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O intends VBZ
O to TO
O sell VB
I two CD
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I West NNP
I Coast NNP
I weekly JJ
I newspaper NN
I chains NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Golden NNP
I West NNP
I Publishing NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O and CC
I Highlander NNP
I Publications NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O together RB
O comprise VBP
I 31 CD
I papers NNS
O <period> <period>
I Media NNP
I General NNP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O has VBZ
O had VBN
I inquiries NNS
O from IN
I potential JJ
I buyers NNS
O and CC
O expects VBZ
O to TO
O complete VB
I a DT
I sale NN
O in IN
I 1989 CD
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O would MD
O n<apost>t RB
O discuss VB
I a DT
I price NN
O <period> <period>
I Lee NNP
I Dirks NNP
I <amp> CC
I Associates NNPS
O is VBZ
O to TO
O sell VB
I the DT
I chains NNS
O <period> <period>
I J<period>P<period> NNP
I Morgan NNP
I <amp> CC
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I New NNP
I York NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O will MD
O help VB
I the DT
I statutory JJ
I managers NNS
O of IN
I DFC NNP
I New NNP
I Zealand NNP
I Ltd<period> NNP
O to TO
O evaluate VB
I the DT
I failed VBN
I investment NN
I bank NN
B <apost>s POS
I condition NN
O <period> <period>
O Earlier RBR
I this DT
I month NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Reserve NNP
I Bank NNP
O of IN
I New NNP
I Zealand NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I country NN
B <apost>s POS
I central JJ
I bank NN
O <comma> <comma>
O appointed VBD
I the DT
I managers NNS
O to TO
O run VB
I the DT
I investment NN
I bank NN
O and CC
O pay VB
I creditors NNS
O <period> <period>
I DFC NNP
O asked VBD
I the DT
I central JJ
I bank NN
O to TO
O appoint VB
I managers NNS
O after IN
I it PRP
O revised VBD
I loan-loss NN
I provisions NNS
O to TO
I around IN
I the DT
I same JJ
I level NN
O of IN
I shareholders NNS
B <apost> POS
I funds NNS
O of IN
I 180 CD
I million CD
I New NNP
I Zealand NNP
I dollars NNS
O <lparen> <lparen>
I US<dollar> <dollar>
I 105<period>4 CD
I million CD
O <rparen> <rparen>
O <period> <period>
I DFC NNP
O is VBZ
O held VBN
I 80 CD
I <percent> NN
O by IN
I National NNP
I Provident NNP
I Fund NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I New NNP
I Zealand NNP
B <apost>s POS
I largest JJS
I pension NN
I fund NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I 20 CD
I <percent> NN
O by IN
I Salomon NNP
I Brothers NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I investment-bank JJ
I and CC
I securities-firm NN
I subsidiary NN
O of IN
I Salomon NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O in IN
I New NNP
I York NNP
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I spokeswoman NN
O for IN
I J<period>P<period> NNP
I Morgan NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I parent NN
O of IN
I the DT
I bank NN
I Morgan NNP
I Guaranty NNP
I Trust NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O confirmed VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I appointment NN
O to TO
O assist VB
I the DT
I managers NNS
O but CC
O declined VBD
O to TO
O elaborate VB
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I managers NNS
O said VBD
O in IN
I a DT
I brief JJ
I statement NN
B yesterday NN
O that IN
I Morgan NNP
O will MD
O help VB
O evaluate VB
I DFC NNP
B <apost>s POS
I position NN
O and CC
O help VB
O determine VB
I alternatives NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I managers NNS
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O expect VB
O to TO
O complete VB
I the DT
I evaluation NN
O until IN
I Nov<period> NNP
I 30 CD
O <period> <period>
I An DT
I experimental JJ
I vaccine NN
O can MD
O alter VB
I the DT
I immune JJ
I response NN
O of IN
I people NNS
O infected VBN
O with IN
I the DT
I AIDS NNP
I virus NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I prominent JJ
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I scientist NN
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O However RB
O <comma> <comma>
I that WDT
O does VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O mean VB
I they PRP
O can MD
O benefit VB
O from IN
I the DT
I vaccine NN
O <period> <period>
I Its PRP<dollar>
I effectiveness NN
O ca MD
O n<apost>t RB
O be VB
O determined VBN
O until IN
I a DT
I large JJ
I clinical JJ
I trial NN
O is VBZ
O undertaken VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I Army NNP
O in IN
I January NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I Robert NNP
I Redfield NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I chief NN
O of IN
I acquired VBN
I immune JJ
I deficiency NN
I syndrome NN
I research NN
O at IN
I Walter NNP
I Reed NNP
I Army NNP
I Institute NNP
O of IN
I Research NNP
O <period> <period>
I Dr<period> NNP
I Redfield NNP
B <apost>s POS
I report NN
O on IN
I early JJ
I experiments NNS
O using VBG
I an DT
I AIDS NNP
I vaccine NN
O made VBN
O by IN
I MicroGeneSys NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O of IN
I West NNP
I Haven NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Conn<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O came VBD
O at IN
I a DT
I meeting NN
O of IN
I AIDS NNP
I vaccine NN
I researchers NNS
O in IN
I Florida NNP
B late JJ
I Monday NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I vaccine NN
O <comma> <comma>
I VaxSyn NNP
I HIV-1 NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O safely RB
O given VBN
O to TO
I 14 CD
I people NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O some DT
O of IN
I whom WP
O are VBP
O experiencing VBG
I substantial JJ
I increases NNS
O in IN
I certain JJ
I antibodies NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I The DT
I conventional JJ
I wisdom NN
O used VBN
O to TO
O be VB
O that IN
I you PRP
O could MD
O n<apost>t RB
O modify VB
I the DT
I immune JJ
I response NN
O of IN
I an DT
I infected VBN
I individual JJ
O <quote> <quote>
O by IN
O innoculating VBG
I them PRP
O with IN
I synthetic JJ
I viral JJ
I proteins NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Dr<period> NNP
I Redfield NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O <apost>ve VBP
O demonstrated VBN
O that IN
I you PRP
O can MD
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I He PRP
O said VBD
I certain JJ
I volunteers NNS
O developed VBD
I kinds NNS
O of IN
I antibodies NNS
O associated VBN
O with IN
I early JJ
I AIDS NNP
O <period> <period>
I Other JJ
I antibodies NNS
O sparked VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I preparation NN
O are VBP
O of IN
I a DT
I sort NN
O rarely RB
O present JJ
O in IN
I large JJ
I quantities NNS
O in IN
I infected VBN
I or CC
I ill JJ
I individuals NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O added VBD
O <period> <period>
I One CD
O of IN
I the DT
I mysteries NNS
O of IN
I AIDS NNP
O remains VBZ
O why WRB
I infected VBN
I people NNS
O produce VBP
I large JJ
I quantities NNS
O of IN
I antibodies NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O deteriorate VB
O nonetheless RB
O <period> <period>
I Cross NNP
I <amp> CC
I Trecker NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O reached VBD
I an DT
I agreement NN
O to TO
O sell VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I Wiedemann NNP
I division NN
O to TO
I recently RB
I created VBN
I Murata NNP
I Wiedemann NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I affiliate NN
O of IN
I Murata NNP
I Machinery NNP
I Ltd<period> NNP
O of IN
I Kyoto NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Japan NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I agreement NN
O also RB
O includes VBZ
I the DT
I purchase NN
O of IN
I Cross NNP
I <amp> CC
I Trecker NNP
I <apost>s POS
O Warner NNP
O <amp> CC
O Swasey NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I Switzerland NNP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O AG NNP
O unit NN
O by IN
I a DT
I European JJ
I affiliate NN
O of IN
I Murata NNP
I Machinery NNP
O <period> <period>
I Cross NNP
I <amp> CC
I Trecker NNP
O is VBZ
O also RB
O selling VBG
I its PRP<dollar>
I equity NN
I interest NN
O in IN
I a DT
I Japanese JJ
I joint JJ
I venture NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Murata NNP
I Warner NNP
I Swasey NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I Murata NNP
I Machinery NNP
O <period> <period>
I Cross NNP
I <amp> CC
I Trecker NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Bloomfield NNP
I Hills NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Mich<period> NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I machine-tool JJ
I maker NN
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I the DT
I net JJ
I sales NNS
I price NN
O of IN
I the DT
I total JJ
I transaction NN
O is VBZ
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 24 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Wiedemann NNP
I division NN
O was VBD
I one CD
O of IN
I three CD
I businesses NNS
O put VBP
O up IN
O for IN
I sale NN
O in IN
I Cross NNP
I <amp> CC
I Trecker NNP
B <apost>s POS
I restructuring NN
I program NN
O announced VBD
O in IN
I July NNP
O <period> <period>
I Cross NNP
I <amp> CC
I Trecker NNP
O said VBD
I negotiations NNS
O are VBP
O under IN
I way NN
O for IN
I the DT
I sale NN
O of IN
I another DT
I company NN
O <comma> <comma>
I RobertsCorp NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I average JJ
I interest NN
I rate NN
O fell VBD
O to TO
I 8<period>292 CD
I <percent> NN
O at IN
I Citicorp NNP
I <apost>s POS
B <dollar> <dollar>
I 50 CD
I million CD
I weekly JJ
I auction NN
O of IN
I 91-day JJ
I commercial JJ
I paper NN
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I corporate JJ
I IOUs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O from IN
I 8<period>483 CD
I <percent> NN
O at IN
I last JJ
I week NN
B <apost>s POS
I sale NN
O <period> <period>
I Bids NNS
O totaling VBG
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 465 CD
I million CD
O were VBD
O submitted VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I accepted VBD
I bids NNS
O were VBD
O at IN
I 8<period>292 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I Citicorp NNP
O also RB
O said VBD
O that IN
I the DT
I average JJ
I rate NN
O fell VBD
O to TO
I 7<period>986 CD
I <percent> NN
O at IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 50 CD
I million CD
I auction NN
O of IN
I 182-day JJ
I commercial JJ
I paper NN
O from IN
I 8<period>1255 CD
I <percent> NN
O at IN
I last JJ
I week NN
B <apost>s POS
I sale NN
O <period> <period>
I Bids NNS
O totaling VBG
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 415 CD
I million CD
O were VBD
O submitted VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I accepted VBD
I bids NNS
O were VBD
O at IN
I 7<period>986 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I bank NN
I holding VBG
I company NN
O will MD
O auction VB
I another DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 50 CD
I million CD
O of IN
I commercial JJ
I paper NN
O in IN
I each DT
I maturity NN
O next JJ
I Tuesday NNP
O <period> <period>
I Matra NNP
I S<period>A<period> NNP
O reported VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I 1989 CD
I first-half JJ
I profit NN
O soared VBD
I 88 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O indicated VBD
O that IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I previous JJ
I estimate NN
O of IN
I a DT
I 50 CD
I <percent> NN
I rise NN
O in IN
I earnings NNS
O for IN
I all DT
O of IN
I 1989 CD
O will MD
O be VB
O exceeded VBN
O by IN
I a DT
I wide JJ
I margin NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I French JJ
I electronics NNS
I and CC
I defense NN
I group NN
O said VBD
I attributable JJ
I consolidated JJ
I net JJ
I profit NN
O for IN
I the DT
I first JJ
I six CD
I months NNS
O of IN
I 1989 CD
O totaled VBD
I 244 CD
I million CD
I francs NNS
O <lparen> <lparen>
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 38<period>4 CD
I million CD
O <rparen> <rparen>
O <comma> <comma>
O compared VBN
O with IN
I 130 CD
I million CD
I francs NNS
O <lparen> <lparen>
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 20<period>5 CD
I million CD
O <rparen> <rparen>
O in IN
I the DT
I corresponding JJ
I period NN
O of IN
I Operating NN
I profit NN
O climbed VBD
I 51 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I 572 CD
I million CD
I francs NNS
O from IN
I 378 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I the DT
I first JJ
I half NN
O of IN
I 1988 CD
O <period> <period>
I Matra NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I sharp JJ
I improvement NN
O in IN
I net JJ
I profit NN
O partly RB
O reflected VBD
I a DT
I decline NN
O of IN
I 59 CD
I million CD
I francs NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I group NN
B <apost>s POS
I net JJ
I loss NN
O from IN
I nonrecurring VBG
I items NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I first JJ
I half NN
O of IN
I this DT
I year NN
O to TO
I 104 CD
I million CD
I francs NNS
O from IN
I 163 CD
I million CD
B a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
I There EX
O was VBD
O also RB
I a DT
I decline NN
O in IN
I the DT
I group NN
B <apost>s POS
I net JJ
I financial JJ
I costs NNS
O to TO
I 25 CD
I million CD
I francs NNS
O from IN
I 50 CD
I million CD
B a DT
I year NN
O before RB
O <period> <period>
I These DT
I movements NNS
O were VBD
O offset VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O however RB
O <comma> <comma>
O by IN
I a DT
I steep JJ
I rise NN
O in IN
I corporate JJ
I income NN
I tax NN
I payments NNS
O to TO
I 199 CD
I million CD
I francs NNS
O from IN
I 35 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I the DT
I first JJ
I six CD
I months NNS
O of IN
I 1988 CD
O <period> <period>
I Matra NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I sharp JJ
I rise NN
O in IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I first-half JJ
I earnings NNS
O was VBD
O based VBN
O on IN
I a DT
I 15 CD
I <percent> NN
I gain NN
O in IN
I consolidated JJ
I revenue NN
O to TO
I 10<period>16 CD
I billion CD
I francs NNS
O from IN
I 8<period>85 CD
I billion CD
B a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
I Rep<period> NNP
I Lee NNP
I Hamilton NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I D<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Ind NNP
I <period> <period>
O <rparen> <rparen>
O said VBD
I he PRP
O and CC
I Rep<period> NNP
I Byron NNP
I Dorgan NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I D<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I N<period>D NNP
I <period> <period>
O <rparen> <rparen>
O are VBP
O backing VBG
O away RB
O from IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I proposal NN
O to TO
O make VB
I the DT
I Treasury NNP
I Secretary NNP
B a DT
I voting NN
I member NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Federal NNP
I Reserve NNP
I panel NN
B that IN
O sets NNS
I monetary JJ
I policy NN
O <period> <period>
I Rep<period> NNP
I Hamilton NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I bill NN
O will MD
O be VB
O modified VBN
O substantially RB
O to TO
O call VB
O for IN
I two CD
I meetings NNS
B each DT
I year NN
O between IN
I the DT
I Fed NNP
B <apost>s POS
I open JJ
I market NN
I committee NN
O and CC
I the DT
I Treasury NNP
I Secretary NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I chairman NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Council NNP
O of IN
I Economic NNP
I Advisers NNPS
O and CC
I the DT
I director NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Office NNP
O of IN
I Management NNP
I and CC
I Budget NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I original JJ
I bill NN
O was VBD
O strongly RB
O opposed VBN
O by IN
I the DT
I Fed NNP
O and CC
O publicly RB
O criticized VBN
O by IN
I friends NNS
O of IN
I the DT
I Fed NNP
O as IN
I an DT
I attempt NN
O to TO
O undermine VB
I the DT
I central JJ
I bank NN
B <apost>s POS
I independence NN
O <period> <period>
I Fed JJ
I critics NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O however RB
O <comma> <comma>
O hailed VBD
I it PRP
O as IN
I a DT
I long JJ
I overdue JJ
I attempt NN
O to TO
O bring VB
I a DT
I measure NN
O of IN
I openness NN
I and CC
I democracy NN
O to TO
I the DT
I setting NN
O of IN
I monetary JJ
I policy NN
O <period> <period>
I Rep<period> NNP
I Hamilton NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I purpose NN
O of IN
I the DT
I meetings NNS
O would MD
O be VB
O to TO
O <quote> <quote>
O improve VB
I communications NNS
O and CC
O perhaps RB
I coordination NN
O between IN
I the DT
I executive JJ
I branch NN
O and CC
I the DT
I Fed NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Fed NNP
I Chairman NNP
I Alan NNP
I Greenspan NNP
O meets VBZ
O regularly RB
O for IN
I lunch NN
O with IN
I Treasury NNP
I Secretary NNP
I Nicholas NNP
I Brady NNP
O and CC
O talks NNS
O frequently RB
O with IN
I Budget NNP
I Director NNP
I Richard NNP
I Darman NNP
O and CC
I Michael NNP
I Boskin NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I chairman NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Council NNP
O of IN
I Economic NNP
I Advisers NNPS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I administration NN
I officials NNS
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O ordinarily RB
O meet VB
O with IN
I the DT
I entire JJ
I membership NN
O of IN
I the DT
I open JJ
I market NN
I committee NN
O <period> <period>
I B<period>F<period> NNP
I Goodrich NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O said VBD
I third-quarter JJ
I profits NNS
O dropped VBD
I 34 CD
I <percent> NN
O because IN
O of IN
I lower JJR
I prices NNS
O for IN
I polyvinyl NN
I chloride NN
I materials NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I largest JJS
I product NN
I group NN
O <period> <period>
I Net NN
O fell VBD
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 40<period>1 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>50 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 60<period>7 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>32 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
I Sales NNS
O for IN
I the DT
I quarter NN
O slipped VBD
I 2<period>7 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 601<period>3 CD
I million CD
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 618<period>1 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I Polyvinyl NN
I chloride NN
I capacity NN
O <quote> <quote>
O has VBZ
O overtaken VBN
I demand NN
O and CC
I we PRP
O are VBP
O experiencing VBG
I reduced VBN
I profit NN
I margins NNS
O as IN
I a DT
I result NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I John NNP
I D<period> NNP
I Ong NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I chairman NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I executive NN
O <period> <period>
I Prices NNS
O for IN
I general-purpose JJ
I PVC NNP
I resin NN
O have VBP
O dropped VBN
I more JJR
I than IN
I 15 CD
I <percent> NN
O since IN
I last JJ
I December NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I plastic NN
I resin NN
O is VBZ
O used VBN
O in IN
I a DT
I wide JJ
I range NN
O of IN
I products NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O including VBG
I siding NN
O <comma> <comma>
I pipe NN
O and CC
I electrical JJ
I wire NN
I insulation NN
O <period> <period>
I Goodrich NNP
B <apost>s POS
I vinyl-products NNS
I segment VBP
O reported VBD
I operating VBG
I profit NN
O for IN
I the DT
I quarter NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 30<period>1 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
I less JJR
I than IN
I half PDT
I the DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 64<period>1 CD
I million CD
O of IN
I the DT
I year-earlier JJ
I quarter NN
O <period> <period>
I Third-quarter JJ
I operating NN
I profit NN
O of IN
I the DT
I specialty-chemicals NNS
I group VBP
O declined VBD
O slightly RB
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 24<period>3 CD
I million CD
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 24<period>9 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I operating VBG
I profit NN
O from IN
I aerospace NN
I products NNS
O rose VBD
I nearly RB
I 50 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 15 CD
I million CD
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 10<period>1 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I New NNP
I York NNP
I Stock NNP
I Exchange NNP
I composite JJ
I trading NN
O <comma> <comma>
I shares VBZ
O of IN
I the DT
I Akron NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Ohio-based JJ
I company NN
O fell VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>375 CD
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 49<period>125 CD
O <period> <period>
I Fiat NNP
I S<period>p NNP
I <period> <period>
I A<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Italy NNP
B <apost>s POS
I leading VBG
I industrial JJ
I group NN
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
O conducting VBG
I <quote> <quote>
I concrete JJ
I <quote> <quote>
I talks NNS
O with IN
I West NNP
I Germany NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Daimler-Benz NNP
I AG NNP
O on IN
I a DT
I series NN
O of IN
I projects NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I aerospace NN
I sector NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Fiat NNP
I officials NNS
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O However RB
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I officials NNS
O said VBD
I it PRP
O was VBD
O too RB
O early JJ
O to TO
O disclose VB
I the DT
I nature NN
O of IN
I the DT
I proposed VBN
I projects NNS
O or CC
O indicate VB
O when WRB
I the DT
I talks NNS
O might MD
O be VB
O concluded VBN
O <period> <period>
I Daimler-Benz NNP
I Chairman NNP
I Edzard NNP
I Reuter NNP
O told VBD
I Milan NNP
B <apost>s POS
I financial JJ
I daily JJ
O Il FW
O Sole NNP
O 24 CD
O Ore NNP
O that IN
I talks NNS
O are VBP
O taking VBG
I place NN
O between IN
I both DT
I companies NNS
B <apost> POS
I aerospace NN
I units NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O While IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Reuter NNP
B <apost>s POS
I comments NNS
O please VBP
I us PRP
O very RB
O much RB
O <comma> <comma>
I there EX
O currently RB
O are VBP
I no DT
I talks NNS
O in IN
I progress NN
O regarding VBG
I the DT
I automotive JJ
I industry NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I a DT
I Fiat NNP
I spokeswoman NN
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I the DT
I interview NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Reuter NNP
O said VBD
I he PRP
O is VBZ
O thinking VBG
O foremost JJ
O of IN
I cooperation NN
O in IN
I the DT
I truck NN
I sector NN
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O <quote> <quote>
O in IN
I the DT
I long JJ
I run NN
O <comma> <comma>
I I PRP
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O want VB
O to TO
O rule VB
O out RP
O that IN
I we PRP
O can MD
O also RB
O come VB
I a DT
I bit NN
O closer JJR
O in IN
I personal JJ
I cars NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Roberto NNP
I Morelli NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Italy NNP
I analyst NN
O for IN
I County NNP
I Natwest NNP
I Securities NNPS
O in IN
I London NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
O that DT
O right RB
O now RB
O <quote> <quote>
I the DT
I market NN
O is VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O being VBG
O influenced VBN
O by IN
I that DT
I kind NN
O of IN
I news NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O referring VBG
O to TO
I the DT
I conditional JJ
I nature NN
O of IN
I the DT
I talks NNS
O mentioned VBN
O by IN
I Mr<period> NNP
I Reuter NNP
O and CC
O by IN
I the DT
I uncertainty NN
O surrounding VBG
I world NN
I stock NN
I exchanges VBZ
B this DT
I week NN
O <period> <period>
I Paul NNP
I Tanner NNP
O was VBD
O named VBN
I president NN
O <comma> <comma>
I chief JJ
I executive JJ
I officer NN
O and CC
I chairman NN
O of IN
I this DT
I oil NN
I and CC
I natural JJ
I gas NN
I company NN
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O succeeds VBZ
I John NNP
I A<period> NNP
I Boudreau NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O resigned VBD
O for IN
I personal JJ
I reasons NNS
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Tanner NNP
O had VBD
O been VBN
I president NN
O of IN
I Penn NNP
I Pacific NNP
B <apost>s POS
I National NNP
I Southwest NNP
I Capital NNP
I Group NNP
I subsidiary NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Boudreau NNP
O will MD
O remain VB
O with IN
I Penn NNP
I Pacific NNP
O as IN
I a DT
I director NN
O and CC
I a DT
I member NN
O of IN
I the DT
I executive JJ
I committee NN
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O has VBZ
O also RB
O agreed VBN
O to TO
O become VB
I president NN
O of IN
I a DT
I new JJ
I subsidiary NN
O to TO
O be VB
O formed VBN
O to TO
O make VB
I future NN
I acquisitions NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I company NN
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Spooked VBN
I investors NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O despite IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I stampede NN
O to TO
O dump VB
I takeover NN
I stocks NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O should MD
O hold VB
O on IN
O tight JJ
O to TO
I their PRP<dollar>
I Jaguar NNP
I shares NNS
O <period> <period>
I That DT
O <apost>s VBZ
I the DT
I view NN
O of IN
I some DT
I analysts NNS
O here RB
I who WP
O argue VBP
O that IN
I Britain NNP
B <apost>s POS
I leading VBG
I maker NN
O of IN
I luxury NN
I cars NNS
O still RB
O may MD
O have VB
I two CD
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I auto NN
I giants NNS
O battling VBG
O for IN
I it PRP
O <period> <period>
I Yesterday NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Ford NNP
I Motor NNP
O disclosed VBD
O that IN
I it PRP
O has VBZ
O raised VBN
I its PRP<dollar>
I holding NN
O in IN
I Jaguar NNP
O to TO
I 10<period>4 CD
I <percent> NN
O from IN
I 5 NN
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
O Both DT
I Ford NNP
O and CC
I its PRP<dollar>
I rival JJ
I General NNP
I Motors NNPS
O recently RB
O set VBN
I their PRP<dollar>
I sights NNS
O on IN
O grabbing VBG
I significant JJ
I minority NN
I stakes NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I British JJ
I company NN
O <period> <period>
I Ford NNP
B <apost>s POS
I latest JJS
I move NN
O increases VBZ
I the DT
I pressure NN
O on IN
I GM NNP
O to TO
O complete VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I current JJ
I talks NNS
O with IN
I Jaguar NNP
O quickly RB
O <period> <period>
I GM NNP
O is VBZ
O likely JJ
O to TO
O reach VB
I the DT
I cooperative JJ
I operating NN
I pact NN
B it PRP
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O seeking VBG
O in IN
I about IN
I two CD
I weeks NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I knowledgeable JJ
I individuals NNS
O say VBP
O <period> <period>
O At IN
I that DT
I point NN
B investors NNS
O may MD
O face VB
I a DT
I long JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I bumpy JJ
I ride NN
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I victor NN
O in IN
I the DT
I fight NN
O for IN
I Jaguar NNP
O may MD
O not RB
O emerge VB
O until IN
O after IN
I the DT
I expiration NN
B late JJ
I next JJ
I year NN
O of IN
I British JJ
I government NN
I takeover NN
I restrictions NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I curbs NNS
O prevent VBP
I a DT
I buyer NN
O from IN
O purchasing VBG
I more JJR
I than IN
I 15 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I Jaguar NNP
I shares NNS
O without IN
I permission NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I This DT
O is VBZ
I an DT
I exceptionally RB
I odd JJ
I takeover NN
I battle NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I London NNP
I analyst NN
B Christopher NNP
I Will MD
O of IN
I Shearson NNP
I Lehman NNP
I Hutton NNP
O <period> <period>
I Jaguar NNP
B <apost>s POS
I American JJ
I depositary NN
I receipts NNS
O were VBD
O up IN
I 3<bslash><fslash>8 CD
B yesterday NN
O in IN
I a DT
I down JJ
I market NN
O <comma> <comma>
O closing VBG
O at IN
I 10 CD
I 3<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O <period> <period>
O <lparen> <lparen>
I Jaguar NNP
B <apost>s POS
I ADRs NNS
O make VBP
I the DT
I company NN
B one CD
O of IN
I the DT
I most RBS
I widely RB
I held VBN
I United NNP
I Kingdom NNP
I stocks NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I more JJR
I than IN
I one-fourth NN
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I shares NNS
O owned VBN
O there RB
O <period> <period>
O <rparen> <rparen>
I Jaguar NNP
O topped VBD
I the DT
I most-active JJ
I list NN
O for IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I over-the-counter JJ
I market NN
B Monday NNP
O <period> <period>
O And CC
O on IN
I London NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Stock NNP
I Exchange NNP
B Monday NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 18<period>5 CD
I million CD
I shares NNS
O were VBD
O traded VBN
O <comma> <comma>
O far RB
O above IN
I the DT
I usual JJ
I volume NN
O <period> <period>
I Ford NNP
B <apost>s POS
I share NN
I purchases NNS
O undoubtedly RB
O accounted VBD
O for IN
I much NN
O of IN
I Monday NNP
B <apost>s POS
I heavy JJ
I trading NN
O <period> <period>
I Last JJ
I week NN
O <comma> <comma>
I many JJ
I Jaguar NNP
I shareholders NNS
O took VBD
I their PRP<dollar>
I money NN
O and CC
O ran VBD
O <period> <period>
I Fears NNS
O that IN
I Ford NNP
B <apost>s POS
I ardor NN
O might MD
O be VB
O cooling NN
O put NN
I Jaguar NNP
I shares NNS
O into IN
I reverse NN
O after IN
I GM NNP
O confirmed VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I friendly JJ
I negotiations NNS
O with IN
I Jaguar NNP
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I yesterday NN
B <apost>s POS
I announcement NN
O indicates VBZ
O that IN
I Ford NNP
O has VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O lost VBN
I interest NN
O <period> <period>
O Both DT
I Shearson NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Mr NNP
I <period> <period>
I Will MD
O and CC
I Stephen NNP
I Reitman NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I European JJ
I auto NN
I analyst NN
O at IN
I the DT
I London NNP
I brokerage NN
I firm NN
I UBS-Phillips NNP
I <amp> CC
I Drew NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O recently RB
O switched VBD
I their PRP<dollar>
I Jaguar NNP
I recommendations NNS
O to TO
I hold VB
O from IN
I buy NN
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O Sit VB
O tight JJ
O <quote> <quote>
O through IN
I the DT
I coming VBG
I volatility NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Reitman NNP
O suggests VBZ
O <comma> <comma>
O though IN
I he PRP
O concedes VBZ
O that IN
I many JJ
I small JJ
I investors NNS
O will MD
O find VB
I Jaguar NNP
B <apost>s POS
I zigzags NNS
O <quote> <quote>
O too RB
O hard JJ
O to TO
O swallow VB
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
O But CC
I a DT
I crucial JJ
I point NN
O is VBZ
O how WRB
I Ford NNP
O reacts VBZ
O when WRB
I GM NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I world NN
B <apost>s POS
I largest JJS
I auto NN
I maker NN
O <comma> <comma>
O firms VBZ
O up IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I proposed VBN
I deal NN
O with IN
I Jaguar NNP
O <period> <period>
O At IN
I the DT
I moment NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Ford NNP
I executives NNS
O will MD
O say VB
I little JJ
O beyond IN
O reiterating VBG
I their PRP<dollar>
I desire NN
O to TO
O raise VB
I Ford NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Jaguar NNP
I stake NN
O to TO
I about IN
I 15 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I GM NNP
O is VBZ
O expected VBN
O to TO
O inject VB
I roughly RB
I <hash> <hash>
I 200 CD
I million CD
O <lparen> <lparen>
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 316 CD
I million CD
O <rparen> <rparen>
O by IN
O acquiring VBG
I some DT
I Jaguar NNP
I shares NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
O then RB
O win VB
I Jaguar NNP
I management NN
B <apost>s POS
I promise NN
O of IN
I an DT
I eventual JJ
I 30 CD
I <percent> NN
I stake NN
O <period> <period>
I Analysts NNS
O believe VBP
I the DT
I car NN
I makers NNS
O also RB
O will MD
O create VB
I joint JJ
I ventures NNS
O to TO
O develop VB
I new JJ
I executive NN
I models NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O doubling VBG
I Jaguar NNP
B <apost>s POS
I yearly JJ
I output NN
O of IN
I 50<comma>000 CD
I cars NNS
O <period> <period>
I Jaguar NN
I shareholders NNS
O would MD
O have VB
O to TO
O bless VB
I such JJ
I a DT
I far-reaching JJ
I accord NN
O <period> <period>
I Ford NNP
O might MD
O challenge VB
I the DT
I proposal NN
O by IN
O offering VBG
I a DT
I full JJ
I bid NN
O if IN
I holders NNS
O and CC
I the DT
I U<period>K<period> NNP
I government NN
O agreed VBD
O to TO
O drop VB
I the DT
I anti-takeover JJ
I barrier NN
O early JJ
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O think VBP
I Ford NNP
O is VBZ
O going VBG
O to TO
O come VB
O out IN
O with IN
I full JJ
I guns NNS
O blazing VBG
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Reitman NNP
O says VBZ
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Ford NNP
O wants VBZ
O <lparen> <lparen>
I Jaguar NNP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O very RB
O much RB
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I takeover-stock JJ
I speculators NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O may MD
O own VB
I between IN
I 20 CD
I <percent> NN
I and CC
I 30 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I Jaguar NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O could MD
O give VB
I Ford NNP
B enough RB
I votes VBZ
O to TO
O block VB
I the DT
I GM NNP
I deal NN
O <period> <period>
I GM NNP
O might MD
O counterbid NN
O <period> <period>
O Then RB
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr NNP
I <period> <period>
I Will MD
O says VBZ
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I you PRP
O get VBP
I a DT
I bidding NN
I war NN
O between IN
I two CD
I very RB
I rich JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I very RB
I determined VBN
I international JJ
I companies NNS
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I He PRP
O believes VBZ
I Jaguar NNP
B <apost>s POS
I share NN
I price NN
O could MD
O zoom VB
O to TO
I between IN
I <hash> <hash>
I 8 CD
I and CC
I <hash> <hash>
I 10 CD
O <lparen> <lparen>
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 12<period>60 CD
I to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 15<period>80 CD
O <rparen> <rparen>
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I There EX
O <apost>s VBZ
I quite RB
I a DT
I bit NN
O of IN
I value NN
O left VBN
O in IN
O the DT
O <lparen> <lparen>
I Jaguar NNP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O shares NNS
O here RB
O even RB
O though IN
I they PRP
O have VBP
O run VBN
O up IN
O <quote> <quote>
O lately RB
O <comma> <comma>
O says VBZ
I Doug NNP
I Johnson NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I fund NN
I manager NN
O for IN
I Seattle-based JJ
I Safeco NNP
I Asset NNP
I Management NNP
O <period> <period>
O At IN
I the DT
I moment NN
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O intends VBZ
O to TO
O keep VB
I the DT
I firm NN
B <apost>s POS
I 180<comma>000 CD
I Jaguar NNP
I shares NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I risk NN
O is VBZ
O that IN
I Jaguar NNP
B <apost>s POS
I share NN
I price NN
O could MD
O slump VB
O if IN
I GM NNP
B <apost>s POS
I agreement NN
O with IN
I Jaguar NNP
O effectively RB
O locks VBZ
O out IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I rival JJ
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I Ford NNP
B <apost>s POS
I appetite NN
O to TO
O attack VB
O <lparen> <lparen>
I Jaguar NNP
O <rparen> <rparen>
O could MD
O gradually RB
O wane VB
O over IN
I time NN
O <comma> <comma>
O particularly RB
O if IN
I Saab NNP
O is VBZ
I a DT
I reasonably RB
I attractive JJ
I proposition NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O says VBZ
I John NNP
I Lawson NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I an DT
I auto NN
I analyst NN
O at IN
I London NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Nomura NNP
I Research NNP
I Institute NNP
O <period> <period>
I He PRP
O thinks VBZ
I Saab-Scania NNP
I AB NNP
O on IN
I Friday NNP
O will MD
O announce VB
I the DT
I sale NN
O of IN
I 50 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I car NN
I division NN
O to TO
I Ford NNP
O <colon> =colon=
I the DT
I companies NNS
O have VBP
O been VBN
O discussing VBG
I closer JJR
I cooperation NN
O for IN
I months NNS
O <period> <period>
I Clifford NNP
I Stahl NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I president NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I investment NN
I officer NN
O of IN
I C-S NNP
I Capital NNP
I Advisors NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I two CD
I weeks NNS
O ago RB
O sold VBN
I his PRP<dollar>
I Cincinnati NNP
I firm NN
B <apost>s POS
I 107<comma>100 CD
I Jaguar NNP
I ADRs NNS
O at IN
I about IN
I 10 CD
B each DT
O <comma> <comma>
O making VBG
I a DT
I tidy JJ
I profit NN
O on IN
I a DT
I holding VBG
O purchased VBN
O at IN
I 4 CD
I 7<bslash><fslash>8 CD
O in IN
I early JJ
I May NNP
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I I PRP
O thought VBD
I the DT
I probabilities NNS
O of IN
O <lparen> <lparen>
I a DT
I bidding NN
I war NN
O <rparen> <rparen>
O happening VBG
O were VBD
O less JJR
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O says VBZ
O <period> <period>
O Of IN
I course NN
O <comma> <comma>
I that WDT
O was VBD
O before IN
I Ford NNP
B <apost>s POS
I latest JJS
I move NN
O <period> <period>
I Jaguar NNP
O <lparen> <lparen>
I OTC NNP
O <colon> =colon=
I Symbol NN
O =colon= =colon=
I JAGRY NNP
O <rparen> <rparen>
I Business NN
O =colon= =colon=
I Luxury NN
I cars NNS
I Year NN
O ended VBN
I Dec<period> NNP
I 31 CD
I <comma> <comma>
I 1988 CD
O =colon= =colon=
I Revenue NN
O =colon= =colon=
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>71 CD
I billion CD
I Net JJ
I income NN
O =colon= =colon=
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 44<period>9 CD
I million CD
O <colon> =colon=
O or CC
I 25 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
I First JJ
I half NN
O ended VBD
O <comma> <comma>
I June NNP
I 30 CD
I <comma> <comma>
I 1989 CD
O =colon= =colon=
I Net JJ
I loss NN
O =colon= =colon=
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>7 CD
I million CD
O vs<period> IN
I net JJ
I income NN
O =colon= =colon=
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 21<period>2 CD
I million CD
O <colon> =colon=
O or CC
I 12 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
I Averae NNP
I daily JJ
I trading NN
I volume NN
O =colon= =colon=
I Ordinary JJ
I shares NNS
O outstanding JJ
O =colon= =colon=
I 182<period>9 CD
I million CD
I NOTE NN
O =colon= =colon=
I All DT
I figures NNS
O are VBP
O translated VBN
O into IN
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I dollars NNS
O based VBN
O on IN
I current JJ
I exchange NN
I rates NNS
O <period> <period>
I A<period>F<period> NNP
I Sloan NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 60 CD
I years NNS
O old JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O announced VBD
O that IN
I he PRP
O will MD
O retire VB
I next JJ
I April NNP
O as IN
I chairman NN
O and CC
I chief JJ
I executive JJ
I officer NN
O of IN
I this DT
I snack NN
I food NN
I and CC
I bakery NN
I products NNS
I maker NN
O <period> <period>
I No DT
I replacement NN
O was VBD
O immediately RB
O named VBN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Sloan NNP
O plans VBZ
O to TO
O remain VB
O on IN
I the DT
I board NN
O until IN
I his PRP<dollar>
I current JJ
I term NN
O expires VBZ
O in IN
I April NNP
I 1991 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Lance NNP
I spokesman NN
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Newport NNP
I Electronics NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O of IN
I Santa NNP
I Ana NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Calif<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I Milton NNP
I B<period> NNP
I Hollander NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I who WP
O holds VBZ
I a DT
I 49<period>4 CD
I <percent> NN
I stake NN
O <comma> <comma>
O requested VBD
I a DT
I special JJ
I shareholders NNS
B <apost> POS
I meeting NN
B next JJ
I Wednesday NNP
O to TO
O remove VB
I four CD
I current JJ
I directors NNS
O and CC
O elect VB
I an DT
I alternative NN
I slate NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Hollander NNP
I <apost>s POS
B High NNP
I Technology NNP
I Holding NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O of IN
I Stamford NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Conn<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O acquired VBN
I most RBS
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I stake NN
B last JJ
I August NNP
O in IN
I an DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 11-a-share JJ
I tender NN
I offer NN
O for IN
I Newport NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I maker NN
O of IN
I electronic-measuring JJ
I devices NNS
O <period> <period>
I Newport NNP
O said VBD
I Mr<period> NNP
I Hollander NNP
O is VBZ
O asking VBG
I shareholders NNS
O to TO
O retain VB
I only RB
I one CD
I director NN
O <comma> <comma>
I James NNP
I R<period> NNP
I Lees NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Newport NNP
I vice NN
I president NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I board NN
O is VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O proposing VBG
I a DT
I slate NN
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I own JJ
O and CC
I the DT
I other JJ
I four CD
I current JJ
I directors NNS
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O want VB
O to TO
O serve VB
O beyond IN
I the DT
I special JJ
I meeting NN
I date NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Newport NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Hollander NNP
O <quote> <quote>
O is VBZ
I the DT
I new JJ
I owner NN
O and CC
O wants VBZ
O to TO
O exercise VB
I control NN
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Barret NNP
I B<period> NNP
I Weekes NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Newport NNP
B <apost>s POS
I chairman NN
O <period> <period>
I Sandoz NNP
I AG NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I major JJ
I Swiss JJ
I chemical NN
I and CC
I pharmaceutical JJ
I group NN
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
O that IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I group NN
I sales NNS
O rose VBD
I 25 CD
I <percent> NN
O to TO
I 9<period>482 CD
I billion CD
I francs NNS
O <lparen> <lparen>
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 5<period>80 CD
I billion CD
O <rparen> <rparen>
O in IN
I the DT
I first JJ
I nine CD
I months NNS
O of IN
I this DT
I year NN
O <comma> <comma>
O with IN
I strong JJ
I gains NNS
O in IN
I all DT
I divisions NNS
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I year NN
O earlier JJR
I sales NNS
O totaled VBD
I 7<period>567 CD
I billion CD
I francs NNS
O <period> <period>
I Positive JJ
I currency NN
I rates NNS
O and CC
I strong JJ
I sales NNS
I growth NN
O led VBN
O to TO
I a DT
I substantial JJ
I rise NN
O in IN
I consolidated JJ
I profit NN
O in IN
I the DT
I period NN
O <comma> <comma>
O although IN
I the DT
I company NN
O did VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O provide VB
I figures NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
O is VBZ
O customary JJ
O with IN
I Swiss JJ
I companies NNS
O <period> <period>
I Sandoz NNP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O expects VBZ
I a DT
I <quote> <quote>
I substantial JJ
I increase NN
I <quote> <quote>
O in IN
I consolidated JJ
I profit NN
O for IN
I the DT
I full JJ
I year NN
O <comma> <comma>
O barring VBG
I major JJ
I currency NN
I rate NN
I changes NNS
O <period> <period>
I Amstrad NNP
I PLC NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I British JJ
I maker NN
O of IN
I computer NN
I hardware NN
O and CC
I communications NNS
I equipment NN
O <comma> <comma>
O posted VBD
I a DT
I 52 CD
I <percent> NN
I plunge NN
O in IN
I pretax JJ
I profit NN
O for IN
I the DT
I latest JJS
I year NN
O <period> <period>
O The DT
O <hash> <hash>
O 76<period>6 CD
O million CD
O <lparen> <lparen>
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 120<period>6 CD
I million CD
O <rparen> <rparen>
O in IN
I pretax JJ
I profit NN
O for IN
I the DT
I 12 CD
I months NNS
O to TO
I June NNP
I 30 CD
O was VBD
O down RB
O from IN
I <hash> <hash>
I 160 CD
I million CD
O <lparen> <lparen>
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 252 CD
I million CD
O <rparen> <rparen>
I a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O and CC
O below IN
I market NN
I expectations NNS
O of IN
I <hash> <hash>
I 80 CD
I million CD
I and CC
I <hash> <hash>
I 90 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I slump NN
O in IN
I profit NN
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O came VBD
O despite IN
I steady JJ
I sales NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
O attributed VBN
O to TO
I increased VB
I costs NNS
O for IN
I parts NNS
O and CC
I problems NNS
O with IN
I model NN
I introductions NNS
O <period> <period>
I Amstrad NNP
B <apost>s POS
I profit NN
O after IN
I taxes NNS
O fell VBD
I a DT
I similarly RB
I steep JJ
I 51 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I <hash> <hash>
I 51<period>1 CD
I million CD
O from IN
I <hash> <hash>
I 105 CD
I million CD
B a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
I Sales NNS
O edged VBD
O up IN
O fractionally RB
O to TO
I <hash> <hash>
I 626<period>3 CD
I million CD
O from IN
I <hash> <hash>
I 625<period>4 CD
I million CD
B a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
I Microsoft NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
B <apost>s POS
I earnings NNS
I growth NN
O continued VBD
O to TO
O outstrip VB
I that IN
O of IN
I most RBS
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I competitors NNS
I and CC
I customers NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I personal-computer NN
I industry NN
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
I it PRP
O reported VBD
I a DT
I 36 CD
I <percent> NN
I jump NN
O in IN
I fiscal JJ
I first-quarter JJ
I earnings NNS
O on IN
I a DT
I 33 CD
I <percent> NN
I revenue NN
I gain NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Redmond NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Wash<period> NNP
I company NN
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I bellwether NN
I provider NN
O of IN
I operating VBG
I systems NNS
O and CC
I software NN
O for IN
I personal-computer NN
I makers NNS
I and CC
I users NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O reported VBD
I net JJ
I income NN
O for IN
I the DT
I quarter NN
O ended VBN
I Sept<period> NNP
I 30 CD
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 49<period>6 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 87 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O up IN
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 36<period>6 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 65 CD
I cents NNS
B a DT
I share NN
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I the DT
I year-ago JJ
I period NN
O <period> <period>
I Revenue NN
O rose VBD
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 235<period>2 CD
I million CD
O <comma> <comma>
O from IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 176<period>4 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I Microsoft NNP
O previously RB
O indicated VBD
I it PRP
O would MD
O have VB
I a DT
I strong JJ
I quarter NN
O by IN
O forecasting VBG
I its PRP<dollar>
I revenue NN
I gain NN
O on IN
I Oct<period> NNP
I 4 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O causing VBG
O a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 6<period>50 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O jump NN
O in IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I stock NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I its PRP<dollar>
I stock NN
O jumped VBD
O again RB
I yesterday NN
O as IN
I it PRP
O disclosed VBD
I surprisingly RB
I strong JJ
I margins NNS
O on IN
I those DT
I sales NNS
O <period> <period>
I Microsoft NNP
B <apost>s POS
I stock NN
O rose VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2<period>875 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O in IN
I national JJ
I over-the-counter JJ
I trading NN
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 78<period>625 CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I stock NN
O had VBD
O hit VBN
I a DT
I high NN
O of IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 81 CD
B a DT
I share NN
O early JJ
I last JJ
I week NN
O but CC
O collapsed VBD
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 73<period>50 CD
O in IN
I the DT
I Friday NNP
I stock NN
I plunge NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I company NN
O had VBD
O been VBN
O experiencing VBG
I softening VBG
I margins NNS
O because IN
O of IN
I increased VBN
I sales NNS
O of IN
I software NN
I applications NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O have VBP
I lower JJR
I margins NNS
O than IN
O do VBP
I operating VBG
I systems NNS
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I the DT
I company NN
O said VBD
I that DT
I trend NN
O was VBD
O offset VBN
O in IN
I the DT
I first JJ
I quarter NN
O by IN
I better JJR
I economies NNS
O of IN
I scale NN
O and CC
I efficiencies NNS
O in IN
I manufacturing NN
O <period> <period>
O As IN
I a DT
I result NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Microsoft NNP
I <apost>s POS
O cost NN
O of IN
I goods NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
I a DT
I percentage NN
O of IN
I sales NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O fell VBD
I 17 CD
I <percent> NN
O from IN
I the DT
I year-ago JJ
I quarter NN
O and CC
I 13 CD
I <percent> NN
O from IN
I the DT
I previous JJ
I period NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I trend NN
O drove VBD
O up IN
I the DT
I aftertax JJ
I margin NN
O -- =colon=
I net JJ
I income NN
O as IN
I a DT
I percentage NN
O of IN
I revenues NNS
O -- =colon=
O to TO
I 21<period>1 CD
I <percent> NN
O in IN
I the DT
I quarter NN
O <comma> <comma>
O compared VBN
O with IN
I 20<period>7 CD
I <percent> NN
B a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
I Microsoft NNP
I officials NNS
O said VBD
I the DT
I strong JJ
I results NNS
O also RB
O reflected VBD
I continuing VBG
I high JJ
I demand NN
O for IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I software NN
I applications NNS
O and CC
I operating VBG
I systems NNS
O <period> <period>
O While IN
I it PRP
O has VBZ
O predicted VBN
O that IN
I overall JJ
I growth NN
O in IN
I unit NN
I sales NNS
O of IN
I personal JJ
I computers NNS
O is VBZ
O slowing VBG
O to TO
I about IN
I a DT
I 10 CD
I <percent> NN
I yearly JJ
I rate NN
O <comma> <comma>
I its PRP<dollar>
I own JJ
I products NNS
O are VBP
O selling VBG
O at IN
I a DT
I much JJ
I faster JJR
I rate NN
O because IN
I many JJ
O are VBP
O geared VBN
O to TO
I the DT
I high-performance JJ
I end NN
O of IN
I the DT
I market NN
O <period> <period>
I That DT
I segment NN
O continues VBZ
O to TO
O post VB
I strong JJ
I quarter-to-quarter JJ
I gains NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O while IN
I the DT
I low-end NN
I <comma> <comma>
I or CC
I commodity NN
I segment NN
I <comma> <comma>
O of IN
I the DT
I industry NN
O is VBZ
O experiencing VBG
I sluggish JJ
I growth NN
O or CC
O even RB
I sales VBZ
I declines NNS
O <period> <period>
O Compared VBN
O with IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I previous JJ
I quarter NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I final JJ
I period NN
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I 1989 CD
I fiscal JJ
I year NN
O <comma> <comma>
I net NN
O rose VBD
I 9 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I sales NNS
O rose VBD
I 7 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I Control NNP
I Data NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Minneapolis NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O signed VBD
I a DT
I joint JJ
I development NN
I agreement NN
O with IN
I MIPS NNP
I Computer NNP
I Systems NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O to TO
O incorporate VB
I an DT
I emerging VBG
I computing VBG
I architecture NN
O in IN
I future NN
I machines NNS
O <period> <period>
I MIPS NNP
O is VBZ
I a DT
I leader NN
O in IN
I what WP
O is VBZ
O known VBN
O as IN
I reduced-instruction NN
I set VBN
I computing VBG
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I RISC NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I technology NN
O combining VBG
I microprocessors NNS
O and CC
I sophisticated JJ
I software NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
O joining VBG
I MIPS NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Control NNP
I Data NNP
O follows VBZ
I several JJ
I competitors NNS
O in IN
O embracing VBG
I RISC NNP
O as IN
I a DT
I new JJ
I design NN
I approach NN
O <period> <period>
I Digital NNP
I Equipment NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Tandem NNP
I Computers NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I NEC NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O and CC
I Group NNP
I Bull NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O among IN
I others NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O have VBP
I similar JJ
I arrangements NNS
O with IN
I MIPs NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O based VBN
O in IN
I Sunnyvale NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Calif NNP
O <period> <period>
I Control NNP
I Data NNP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O expects VBZ
I its PRP<dollar>
I first JJ
I RISC-based JJ
I mainframe NN
I machine NN
O to TO
O be VB
O introduced VBN
I next JJ
I year NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I accord NN
O with IN
I MIPS NNP
O calls VBZ
O for IN
I Control NNP
I Data NNP
O to TO
O share VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I expertise NN
O in IN
I data NNS
I storage NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I companies NNS
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Control NNP
I Data NNP
O also RB
O said VBD
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O developing VBG
I what WP
B it PRP
O called VBD
I a DT
I <quote> <quote>
I supermainframe NN
I <quote> <quote>
I computer NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Cyber NNP
I 2000 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O intended VBN
O for IN
I scientists NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I engineers NNS
O and CC
I other JJ
I users NNS
O of IN
I generalpurpose JJ
I high-performance JJ
I computers NNS
O <period> <period>
I UAL<apost>S NNP
I STOCK NN
O SKIDDED VBD
I an DT
I additional JJ
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 24<period>875 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 198 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O as IN
I British JJ
I Airways NNPS
O indicated VBD
I it PRP
O may MD
O balk VB
O at IN
I any DT
I hastily RB
I revised VBN
I version NN
O of IN
I the DT
I aborted JJ
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 6<period>79 CD
I billion CD
I buy-out NN
O of IN
I United NNP
I Air NNP
B <apost>s POS
I parent NN
O <period> <period>
I UAL NNP
O has VBZ
O fallen VBN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 87<period>25 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O or CC
I 31 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I the DT
I three CD
I trading NN
I days NNS
O since IN
I disclosure NN
O of IN
I the DT
I buy-out NN
B <apost>s POS
I collapse NN
O jolted VBD
I the DT
I stock NN
I market NN
O <period> <period>
O Meanwhile RB
O <comma> <comma>
I investor NN
I Marvin NNP
I Davis NNP
O said VBD
I he PRP
O remains VBZ
O interested JJ
O in IN
I UAL NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I he PRP
O dropped VBD
I his PRP<dollar>
I earlier RBR
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 300-a-share JJ
I back-up NN
I bid NN
O <period> <period>
I Stock NN
I prices NNS
O fell VBD
O broadly RB
O in IN
I heavy JJ
I trading NN
O <comma> <comma>
O dominated VBN
O by IN
I futures-related JJ
I program NN
I selling VBG
O and CC
I further JJ
I declines NNS
O by IN
I UAL NNP
O and CC
I other JJ
I airline NN
I stocks NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Dow NNP
I Jones NNP
I industrials NNS
O closed VBD
O off IN
I 18<period>65 CD
I points NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O at IN
I 2638<period>73 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O after IN
O plunging VBG
I over IN
I 60<period>25 CD
I points NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I morning NN
O <period> <period>
I Bond NN
I prices NNS
O ended VBD
O lower JJR
O after IN
I an DT
I early JJ
I rally NN
O <comma> <comma>
O while IN
I the DT
I dollar NN
O was VBD
O mixed VBN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I trade NN
I deficit NN
O swelled VBD
O to TO
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 10<period>77 CD
I billion CD
O in IN
I August NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O prompting VBG
I worries NNS
O that IN
I the DT
I nation NN
B <apost>s POS
I export NN
I drive NN
O had VBD
O stalled VBN
O <period> <period>
I Exports NNS
O declined VBD
O for IN
I the DT
I second JJ
I month NN
O in IN
I a DT
I row NN
O <comma> <comma>
O while IN
I imports NNS
O rose VBD
O to TO
I a DT
I record NN
O <period> <period>
I An DT
I analyst NN
O called VBD
I it PRP
B one CD
O of IN
I the DT
I worst JJS
I trade NN
I reports NNS
O since IN
I the DT
I dollar NN
O bottomed VBN
O out IN
O in IN
I Industrial JJ
I output NN
O fell VBD
I 0<period>1 CD
I <percent> NN
O in IN
I September NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I latest JJS
I sign NN
B manufacturing NN
O is VBZ
O slowing VBG
O <period> <period>
I An DT
I analyst NN
O cited VBD
I weaker JJR
I capital NN
I spending NN
I and CC
I exports NNS
O <period> <period>
I Bankers NNP
I Trust NNP
O added VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>6 CD
I billion CD
O to TO
I reserves NNS
O for IN
I Third NNP
I World NNP
I loans NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I latest JJS
I big JJ
I bank NN
O to TO
O take VB
I such JJ
I a DT
I step NN
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O expects VBZ
I a DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 1<period>42 CD
I billion CD
I quarterly JJ
I loss NN
O <period> <period>
I Citicorp NNP
O posted VBD
I a DT
I 9 CD
I <percent> NN
I drop NN
O in IN
I quarterly JJ
I profit NN
O <period> <period>
I Manufacturers NNP
I Hanover NNP
O had VBD
I a DT
I loss NN
O due JJ
O to TO
I a DT
I big JJ
I reserve NN
I addition NN
O <period> <period>
I Bank NNP
O of IN
I New NNP
I England NNP
O plans VBZ
O to TO
O sell VB
I some DT
I operations NNS
O and CC
O lay VBD
O off IN
I 4 CD
I <percent> NN
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I work NN
I force NN
O after IN
I a DT
I year NN
O of IN
I weak JJ
I earnings NNS
O and CC
I mounting VBG
I loan NN
I problems NNS
O <period> <period>
I Eastern NNP
I Airlines NNPS
B <apost> POS
I creditors NNS
O have VBP
O begun VBN
O exploring VBG
I alternative NN
I approaches NNS
O to TO
I a DT
I Chapter NN
I 11 CD
I reorganization NN
O because IN
I they PRP
O are VBP
O unhappy JJ
O with IN
I the DT
I carrier NN
B <apost>s POS
I latest JJS
I proposal NN
O <period> <period>
I Tele-Communications NNP
O agreed VBD
O to TO
O buy VB
I half NN
O of IN
I Showtime NNP
I Networks NNP
O from IN
I Viacom NNP
O for IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 225 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I move NN
O could MD
O pose VB
I a DT
I new JJ
I challenge NN
O to TO
I Time NNP
I Warner NNP
B <apost>s POS
I Home NNP
I Box NNP
I Office NNP
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I CFTC NNP
O plans VBZ
O to TO
O curb VB
I dual JJ
I trading NN
O on IN
I commodities NNS
I markets NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I which WDT
B traders NNS
O buy VBP
O and CC
O sell VB
O both DT
O for IN
I their PRP<dollar>
I own JJ
I account NN
O and CC
O for IN
I clients NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I move NN
O is VBZ
O likely JJ
O to TO
O anger NN
I traders NNS
O <period> <period>
I FDIC NNP
I Chairman NNP
I Seidman NNP
O said VBD
O that IN
I Lincoln NNP
I Savings NNP
I <amp> CC
I Loan NNP
O of IN
I California NNP
O should MD
O have VB
O been VBN
O seized VBN
O in IN
I 1986 CD
O to TO
O contain VB
I losses NNS
B he PRP
O estimated VBD
O will MD
O cost VB
I taxpayers NNS
B as RB
I much JJ
O as IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2 CD
I billion CD
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 67 CD
I billion CD
I spending NN
I bill NN
O was VBD
O approved VBN
O by IN
I House-Senate NNP
I conferees NNS
B that WDT
O includes VBZ
I major JJ
I provisions NNS
O affecting VBG
I the DT
I federal JJ
I mortgage NN
I market NN
O <period> <period>
I Hooker NNP
B <apost>s POS
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I unit NN
O is VBZ
O expected VBN
O to TO
O agree VB
O in IN
I principle NN
B this DT
I week NN
O to TO
O sell VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I Merksamer NNP
I Jewelers NNPS
I chain NN
O to TO
I management NN
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I executives NNS
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I deficit-reduction NN
I bill NN
O became VBD
O snagged VBN
O over IN
I efforts NNS
O to TO
O streamline VB
I the DT
I House NNP
I version NN
O of IN
I the DT
I legislation NN
O in IN
I advance NN
O of IN
I a DT
I House-Senate NNP
I conference NN
O <period> <period>
I Integrated NNP
I Resources NNPS
O said VBD
I talks NNS
O have VBP
O ended VBN
O with IN
I another DT
I potential JJ
I buyer NN
O of IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I core NN
I businesses NNS
O <period> <period>
I Three CD
I big JJ
I drug NN
I makers NNS
O posted VBD
I robust JJ
I third-quarter JJ
I earnings NNS
O <period> <period>
I Merck NNP
B <apost>s POS
I profit NN
O climbed VBD
I 25 CD
I <percent> NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Warner-Lambert NNP
I <apost>s POS
B 22 CD
I <percent> NN
O and CC
I Eli NNP
I Lilly NNP
I <apost>s POS
B 24 CD
I <percent> NN
O <period> <period>
I Markets NNS
O -- =colon=
I Stocks NNS
O =colon= =colon=
I Volume NN
B 224<comma>070<comma>000 CD
I shares NNS
O <period> <period>
I Dow NNP
I Jones NNP
I industrials NNS
B 2638<period>73 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O off IN
I 18<period>65 CD
O <colon> =colon=
I transportation NN
B 1254<period>27 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O off IN
I 49<period>96 CD
O <colon> =colon=
I utilities NNS
B 214<period>54 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O off IN
I 0<period>19 CD
O <period> <period>
I Bonds NNS
O =colon= =colon=
I Shearson NNP
I Lehman NNP
I Hutton NNP
I Treasury NNP
I index NN
B 3377<period>43 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O off IN
I Commodities NNS
O =colon= =colon=
I Dow NNP
I Jones NNP
I futures NNS
I index NN
B 129<period>72 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O unchanged JJ
O <colon> =colon=
I spot NN
I index NN
B 129<period>97 CD
O <comma> <comma>
O off IN
I 0<period>19 CD
O <period> <period>
I Dollar NN
O =colon= =colon=
I 142<period>75 CD
I yen NN
O <comma> <comma>
O up IN
I 0<period>95 CD
O <colon> =colon=
I 1<period>8667 CD
I marks NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O off IN
I 0<period>0018 CD
O <period> <period>
I Paul NNP
I Ely NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I general JJ
I partner NN
O of IN
I Alpha NNP
I Partners NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I venture-capital JJ
I firm NN
O based VBN
O in IN
I Menlo NNP
I Park NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Calif<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O was VBD
O named VBN
I a DT
I director NN
O of IN
I this DT
I computer NN
I company NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Ely NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 57 CD
I years NNS
O old JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O temporarily RB
O increases VBZ
I the DT
I board NN
O to TO
I seven CD
I members NNS
O <period> <period>
O However RB
O <comma> <comma>
I director NN
I Thomas NNP
I O<apost>Rourke NNP
O has VBZ
O said VBD
I he PRP
O wo MD
O n<apost>t RB
O seek VB
I re-election NN
O at IN
I the DT
I company NN
B <apost>s POS
I annual JJ
I meeting NN
B next JJ
I month NN
O <period> <period>
I BroadBeach NNP
I Associates NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I Los NNP
I Angeles NNP
I investment NN
I partnership NN
B whose WP<dollar>
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 62-a-share JJ
I bid NN
O for IN
I McGill NNP
I Manufacturing NNP
I Co<period> NNP
O was VBD
O topped VBN
O recently RB
O by IN
I a DT
I competing VBG
I offer NN
O from IN
I a DT
I Swedish JJ
I concern NN
O <comma> <comma>
O disclosed VBN
O that IN
I it PRP
O sold VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I entire JJ
I 7 CD
I <percent> NN
I McGill NNP
I stake NN
O <period> <period>
I McGill NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I Valparaiso NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I Ind<period> NNP
I <comma> <comma>
I ball-bearing NN
I manufacturer NN
O <comma> <comma>
O had VBD
O rebuffed VBN
I BroadBeach NNP
B <apost>s POS
I proposal NN
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O has VBZ
O since IN
O asked VBN
I holders NNS
O not RB
O to TO
O immediately RB
O tender VBP
I their PRP<dollar>
I shares NNS
O under IN
I a DT
I recent JJ
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 72-a-share JJ
I <comma> <comma>
I or CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 104 CD
I million CD
I <comma> <comma>
I bid NN
O from IN
I AB NNP
I SKF NNP
O of IN
I Sweden NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O until IN
I McGill NNP
I directors NNS
O have VBP
O completed VBN
I their PRP<dollar>
I evaluation NN
O <period> <period>
O In IN
O a DT
I Securities NNP
I and CC
I Exchange NNP
I Commission NNP
O filing NN
O <comma> <comma>
I BroadBeach NNP
O said VBD
I it PRP
O sold VBD
I the DT
I 101<comma>000 CD
I McGill NNP
I shares NNS
O for IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 7<period>3 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I a DT
I private JJ
I transaction NN
O on IN
I Oct<period> NNP
I 12 CD
O <period> <period>
I BroadBeach NNP
O did VBD
O n<apost>t RB
O identify VB
I the DT
I buyer NN
O of IN
I the DT
I shares NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
I the DT
I date NN
O of IN
I the DT
I selloff NN
O followed VBN
O by IN
I one CD
I day NN
B the DT
I Swedish JJ
I concern NN
B <apost>s POS
I tender NN
I offer NN
O <comma> <comma>
O and CC
I the DT
I indicated VBN
I price NN
O of IN
I the DT
I shares NNS
O sold VBN
O equals VBZ
I SKF NNP
B <apost>s POS
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 72-a-share JJ
I tender NN
I offer NN
I price NN
O <period> <period>
I A DT
I BroadBeach NNP
I spokeswoman NN
O said VBD
I the DT
I company NN
O sold VBD
I the DT
I stock NN
O in IN
I the DT
I open JJ
I market NN
O and CC
O thus RB
O could MD
O n<apost>t RB
O identify VB
I the DT
I buyer NN
I or CC
I buyers NNS
O <period> <period>
I Luis NNP
I Nogales NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I 45 CD
I years NNS
O old JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O elected VBN
O to TO
I the DT
I board NN
O of IN
I this DT
I brewer NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Nogales NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I former JJ
I president NN
O of IN
I United NNP
I Press NNP
I International NNP
O and CC
I the DT
I Univision NNP
I Spanish-language JJ
I network NN
O <comma> <comma>
O most RBS
O recently RB
O co-founded VBD
I Nogales NNP
I Castro NNP
I Partners NNPS
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I California-based JJ
I media NNS
I acquisition NN
I firm NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Nogales NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I first JJ
I Hispanic JJ
I person NN
O to TO
O serve VB
O as IN
I a DT
I Coors NNP
I director NN
O <comma> <comma>
O is VBZ
I an DT
I addition NN
O to TO
I the DT
I board NN
O <comma> <comma>
O increasing VBG
I its PRP<dollar>
I membership NN
O to TO
I nine CD
O <period> <period>
I Hachette NNP
I S<period>A<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I European JJ
I media NNS
I and CC
I publishing NN
I group NN
O <comma> <comma>
O reported VBD
I a DT
I small JJ
I rise NN
O in IN
I its PRP<dollar>
I attributable JJ
I first-half JJ
I group NN
I profit NN
O <comma> <comma>
O excluding VBG
I exceptional JJ
I items NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O to TO
I 133<period>8 CD
I million CD
I francs NNS
O <lparen> <lparen>
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 21<period>1 CD
I million CD
O <rparen> <rparen>
O from IN
I 130<period>1 CD
I million CD
I francs NNS
B a DT
I year NN
O earlier RBR
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I Paris-based JJ
I group NN
O said VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I earlier JJR
I projection NN
I -- =colon=
I that DT
I group NN
I profit NN
O for IN
I all DT
O of IN
I 1989 CD
O would MD
O be VB
O close RB
O to TO
I the DT
I 322<period>7 CD
I million CD
I francs NNS
O posted VBD
O for IN
I 1988 CD
O -- =colon=
O remains VBZ
O valid JJ
O <period> <period>
O Taking VBG
O into IN
I account NN
B nonrecurring VBG
I gains NNS
I and CC
I losses NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I Hachette NNP
B <apost>s POS
I group NN
I net JJ
I income NN
O for IN
I the DT
I first JJ
I six CD
I months NNS
O of IN
I this DT
I year NN
O totaled VBD
I 246<period>6 CD
I million CD
I francs NNS
O <comma> <comma>
I practically RB
I double VB
I the DT
I year-earlier JJ
I figure NN
O of IN
I 124<period>5 CD
I million CD
I francs NNS
O <period> <period>
I Analysts NNS
O said VBD
I Hachette NNP
B <apost>s POS
I earnings NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I second JJ
I half NN
O might MD
O be VB
O boosted VBN
O by IN
I a DT
I capital NN
I gain NN
O from IN
I the DT
I sale NN
O of IN
I the DT
I Paris NNP
I headquarters NN
O of IN
I a DT
I newspaper-delivery NN
I company NN
B that WDT
O is VBZ
I 49 CD
I <percent> NN
O owned VBN
O by IN
I Hachette NNP
O <period> <period>
I Oncor NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Gaithersburg NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Md<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I it PRP
O received VBD
I approval NN
O from IN
I the DT
I U<period>S<period> NNP
I Food NNP
I and CC
I Drug NNP
I Administration NNP
O to TO
O market VB
I a DT
I genetic JJ
I test NN
B that WDT
O will MD
O assist VB
O in IN
I diagnosis NN
I and CC
I treatment NN
O of IN
I leukemia NN
O and CC
I lymph NN
I cancer NN
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I B<bslash><fslash>T NNP
I gene NN
I rearrangement NN
I test NN
O is VBZ
O more RBR
O accurate JJ
O than IN
I existing VBG
I tests NNS
O for IN
O diagnosing VBG
I the DT
I type NN
O of IN
I cancer NN
O <comma> <comma>
O whether IN
I it PRP
O has VBZ
O spread NN
O or CC
O whether IN
I there EX
O is VBZ
I a DT
I recurrence NN
O following VBG
I treatment NN
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I Oncor NNP
I President NNP
I Stephen NNP
I Turner NNP
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Turner NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I test NN
O initially RB
O will MD
O be VB
O used VBN
O in IN
I conjunction NN
O with IN
I biopsies NNS
O and CC
I other JJ
I tests NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O but CC
O eventually RB
O might MD
O become VB
I the DT
I benchmark NN
O for IN
I tumor NN
I analysis NN
O <period> <period>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Turner NNP
O said VBD
I the DT
I test NN
O will MD
O be VB
O shipped VBN
O in IN
I 45 CD
I days NNS
O to TO
I hospitals NNS
O and CC
I clinical JJ
I laboratories NNS
O <period> <period>
I Dr<period> NNP
I Wyndham NNP
I Wilson NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I cancer NN
I treatment NN
I specialist NN
O at IN
I the DT
I National NNP
I Cancer NNP
I Institute NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I the DT
I test NN
O is VBZ
O widely RB
O used VBN
O in IN
I research NN
I centers NNS
O but CC
O is VBZ
O n<apost>t RB
O having VBG
I a DT
I major JJ
I impact NN
O because IN
I it PRP
O is VBZ
O only RB
O occasionally RB
O useful JJ
O in IN
O choosing VBG
I the DT
I most RBS
I effective JJ
I treatment NN
O <period> <period>
O But CC
I the DT
I test NN
O may MD
O prove VB
O to TO
O be VB
O more RBR
O sensitive JJ
O in IN
O determining VBG
O whether IN
I a DT
I tumor NN
O has VBZ
O spread NN
O or CC
O returned VBN
O following VBG
I treatment NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Dr<period> NNP
I Wilson NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
O <quote> <quote>
I We PRP
O do VBP
O n<apost>t RB
O know VB
O yet RB
O how WRB
O useful JJ
I it PRP
O <apost>s VBZ
O going VBG
O to TO
O be VB
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
I he PRP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Oncor NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I a DT
I six-year-old JJ
I developer NN
O of IN
I genetic JJ
I medical JJ
I tests NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O projects VBZ
O that IN
I the DT
I cancer NN
I test NN
O will MD
O help VB
I it PRP
O to TO
O post VB
I its PRP<dollar>
I first-ever JJ
I profit NN
O during IN
I the DT
I first JJ
I quarter NN
O of IN
I 1990 CD
O <comma> <comma>
I Mr<period> NNP
I Turner NNP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I The DT
I company NN
O will MD
O charge VB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 35 CD
O for IN
I a DT
I test NN
O and CC
O projects NNS
I about RB
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 2 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I revenue NN
O from IN
I the DT
I test NN
O during IN
I the DT
I first JJ
I 12 CD
I months NNS
O of IN
I marketing NN
O <comma> <comma>
I he PRP
O said VBD
O <period> <period>
I Unilab NNP
I Corp<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Norcross NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Ga<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O said VBD
I it PRP
O acquired VBD
I the DT
I clinical JJ
I laboratories NNS
O of IN
I closely RB
I held VBN
I Central NNP
I Diagnostic NNP
I Laboratory NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
O in IN
I a DT
I cash NN
I and CC
I securities NNS
I transaction NN
O valued VBN
O at IN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 85 CD
I million CD
O <period> <period>
I Unilab NNP
O said VBD
I its PRP<dollar>
I wholly RB
I owned VBN
I MetWest NNP
I Inc<period> NNP
I unit NN
O paid VBN
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 25 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I cash NN
O <comma> <comma>
O provided VBD
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 30 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I notes NNS
O and CC
I <dollar> <dollar>
I 30 CD
I million CD
O in IN
I preferred JJ
I stock NN
O to TO
O acquire VB
I Central NNP
B <apost>s POS
I labs NNS
O in IN
I the DT
I Western NNP
I U<period>S<period> NNP
O <period> <period>
I Unilab NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I which WDT
O provides VBZ
I clinical JJ
I laboratory NN
I services NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O competed VBD
O with IN
I Central NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O based VBN
O in IN
I Tarzana NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Calif<period> NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O in IN
I a DT
I number NN
O of IN
I areas NNS
O <period> <period>
O Beyond IN
O removing VBG
I a DT
I competitor NN
O <comma> <comma>
I the DT
I combination NN
O should MD
O provide VB
O <quote> <quote>
I synergies NNS
O <comma> <comma>
O <quote> <quote>
O said VBD
I Fred NNP
I Harlow NNP
O <comma> <comma>
I Unilab NNP
B <apost>s POS
I chief JJ
I financial JJ
I officer NN
O <period> <period>
I It PRP
O also RB
O will MD
O hand VB
I Unilab NNP
B new JJ
I markets NNS
O <period> <period>
O In IN
I Los NNP
I Angeles NNP
O <comma> <comma>
O for IN
I example NN
O <comma> <comma>
I Central NNP
O has VBZ
O had VBN
I a DT
I strong JJ
I market NN
I position NN
O while IN
I Unilab NNP
B <apost>s POS
I presence NN
O has VBZ
O been VBN
O less RBR
O prominent JJ
O <comma> <comma>
O according VBG
O to TO
I Mr<period> NNP
I Harlow NNP
O <period> <period>