You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In principle, the start value of all inputs should work for all datasets. In the past, we have encountered issues where this was not the case. For example, an efficiency > 100% even though the maximum value of the input was set at 100%. It would be good to add a check for this.
This seems a mechanical turk test, since it is not only related to the datasets, but also to the simulation of the input in the future year. We would preferably write a test that for all datasets extracts the start value of all inputs and then sets the values in a scenario. The test should then not produces any calculation errors.
In principle, the start value of all inputs should work for all datasets. In the past, we have encountered issues where this was not the case. For example, an efficiency > 100% even though the maximum value of the input was set at 100%. It would be good to add a check for this.
This seems a mechanical turk test, since it is not only related to the datasets, but also to the simulation of the input in the future year. We would preferably write a test that for all datasets extracts the start value of all inputs and then sets the values in a scenario. The test should then not produces any calculation errors.
What do you think of this idea @noracato. Notifying @kaskranenburgQ.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: