Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review flexibility_spec #167

Open
mabijkerk opened this issue Jan 10, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Review flexibility_spec #167

mabijkerk opened this issue Jan 10, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mabijkerk
Copy link
Member

From flexibility_spec:

   describe "Electricity should be conserved" do

     it "between excess production and storage" do
      expect(@scenario.turk_excess_electricity_storage_sum.value).to be_within(0.000001).of(@scenario.turk_excess_electricity_from_production.value)
     end

   end

  end

Refers to the query turk_excess_electricity_storage_sum. This query seems to be outdated as it for example does not include flow batteries. The question is to which extent 'excess production' is still a relevant concept, given that all flexible technologies are now price-based. Critical review of flexibility_spec is therefore necessary.

@mabijkerk mabijkerk self-assigned this Jan 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant