-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Eemsdelta dataset households shares in useful heat demand don't add to 100% #533
Comments
@kndehaan how big is the delta? If it's very minor than it might be due to rounding issues in Excel. |
@mabijkerk the shares add up to 2.98 (298%), so the delta is quite large and cannot be due to Excel rounding issues. I'm not very familiar with the former municipalities that Eemsdelta is composed of but could it be that there were 3 former municipalities of which the shares are just added up, therefore almost adding up to 300%? Anyhow, this should be fixed by properly combining the former municipality datasets that now represent the Eemsdelta municipality. |
@KoenvanB this issue might actually be related to the issue I spotted for the municipalities listed below, since Eemsdelta is included: Could you look into this? |
This issue has had no activity for 60 days and will be closed in 7 days. Removing the "Stale" label or posting a comment will prevent it from being closed automatically. You can also add the "Pinned" label to ensure it isn't marked as stale in the future. |
I have delved in the issue of @mabijkerk a bit further: Nuenen, gerwen en Nederwetten Sudwest-Fryslan Beekdaelen
There is no label in the areas.yml files in etmodel for this municipality Westerkwartier
There is no label in the areas.yml files in etmodel for this municipality Eemsdelta
There is no label in the areas.yml files in etmodel for this municipality |
The "Share in useful heat demand per residence type and construction period" should add up to 100%. This is not the case for the Eemsdelta municipality. This is probably caused due to some problem in how the datasets of former separate municipalities are combined within the Eemsdelta dataset.
Proposed solution: track down where combining datasets went wrong and correct this error so that all shares add up to 100%.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: