Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Dual treatments #149

Open
pzivich opened this issue Nov 10, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Dual treatments #149

pzivich opened this issue Nov 10, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
@pzivich
Labels
Causal inference Updates for the causal inference branch enhancement Long-term Issues/additions that are longer term goals

Comments

@pzivich
Copy link
Owner

pzivich commented Nov 10, 2020

Currently functionality is not supported for two treatments, like looking at A and B. For binary treatments, this consists of 4 different options.

It may be worth considering the addition of this. Options include: (1) expanding the exposure argument to something like exposure=["A", "B"] or (2) create separate branch for dual treatments specifically but use a similar syntax

I am leaning towards the later. This keeps things consistent with the stochastic treatments and also emphasizes exactly what the user is doing. It would be easier to get lost with option 1 (but I have not decided yet)
@pzivich pzivich added enhancement Long-term Issues/additions that are longer term goals Causal inference Updates for the causal inference branch labels Nov 10, 2020
@pzivich pzivich self-assigned this Nov 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@pzivich pzivich

Labels
Causal inference Updates for the causal inference branch enhancement Long-term Issues/additions that are longer term goals
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@pzivich