Improvement of Pareto front for Multi-objective BO qEHVI #2218
Unanswered
Yoon-SuKyung
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
I see the reference point is set to [0.0,0.0], but the 1-y transform is applied to the second objective---so the transformed second objective would have values between ~ 0.8 and 0.95. Since the problem is then to maximize both objectives, the pareto frontier would be very far from the reference point [0,0]. I'd recommend adjusting the reference point to be slightly worse than the pareto frontier (in the transformed space)---e.g. something like [0.0, 0.75] or better yet use the built-in reference point heuristic: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I am working with the aim of optimizing the airfoil geometry.
Objective1 is the lift coefficient, and objective2 is the drag coefficient. Since all of them need to be maximized, 1-y was applied to objective2.
The purple dot in the figure is the sample point obtained through DOE and the result was obtained.
My expectation is that qEHVI, qParEGO points will be located in a place similar to the pareto-front shown in the figure, but it is not. Why is that? Can't we improve the pareeto front?
so, is it possible to obtain a pareto front for a wider area?
Attached is my code.
code_ver1.txt
Re05000_M02.txt
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions