-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LDFLAGS
and LIBS
not used consistently in configure
#128354
Comments
erlend-aasland
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 3, 2025
zanieb
added a commit
to zanieb/cpython
that referenced
this issue
Jan 4, 2025
… build checks (pythonGH-128359) (cherry picked from commit b75ed95) Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <[email protected]>
zanieb
added a commit
to zanieb/cpython
that referenced
this issue
Jan 4, 2025
… build checks (pythonGH-128359) (cherry picked from commit b75ed95) Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <[email protected]>
erlend-aasland
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 4, 2025
erlend-aasland
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 4, 2025
WolframAlph
pushed a commit
to WolframAlph/cpython
that referenced
this issue
Jan 4, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Bug report
Bug description:
Following up on #128322, I noticed that the same pattern of setting
LDFLAGS
instead ofLIBS
is used frequently. Additionally, there is not consistency in the ordering of the added libraries, e.g.,LIBS="$LIBS ..."
vsLIBS="... $LIBS"
.For cases where the linking order matters, I believe using
LDFLAGS
is incorrect and the existing$LIBS
should always come first.CPython versions tested on:
CPython main branch
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
Linked PRs
LIBS
consistently overLDFLAGS
in library build checks #128359The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: