-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Record ID 99125158555106421 was not indexed - June 11th #2411
Comments
|
We checked with @mzelesky job_id: 38206309060006421 from alma. The specific job failed. We found the id in the webhook.
This is what we save in the Event as message_body. |
The incremental file that includes the record that was not indexed is:
@mzelesky since this job failed in Alma how did it generate the file with the failed Job Id? |
The message_body with
Update on 7/18/2024: I checked lib-sftp and the file has time stamp: "Jun 12 14:05 (UTC)" So far my understanding is that:
bibdata events page - event 7338:alma job report page - process id: 38205463170006421
The main issues here are:
|
Expected behavior
Record with ID 99125158555106421 was changed in Alma on June 11th. It was part of this incremental_38205463170006421_20240611_180656[026]_new file. Today and with no additional updates the catalog record should reflect the changes from June 11th.
Actual behavior
The record did not get indexed.
Further Notes
Nancy B. from E-resources reported this issue in the catalog channel. @mzelesky investigated the exported files in Alma during this period and found that the record did get sent from Alma.
The timestamp from the JSON file indicates that the record was last indexed on 2024-05-22.
Impact of this bug
The users cannot find all the available issues for this record in the catalog.
Suggestion
1. create an xml file for the record
2. scp the file to bibdata-qa-worker1,
3. follow the [documentation on how to index an xml file] (https://github.com/pulibrary/bibdata/blob/main/docs/test_indexing.md#scenario-1-test-indexing-a-specific-xml-file) and index the file
4. repeat the same steps on bibdata-worker-staging1.
5. Review the record in catalog-staging.princeton.edu and catalog-qa.princeton.edu (make sure catalog-qa.princeton.edu is pointing to the Solr collection you used to index the file in bibdata-qa-worker1 -step 3)
6. If the record does not reflect the changes review the logs on the VM, download the incremental file locally and troubleshoot in your dev environment.
7. If everything looks ok index the record in bibdata-worker-prod1.
8. Review the record in catalog.princeton.edu
9. If the record reflects the portfolio changes follow up in the catalog channel with Nancy and close this ticket.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: