BUG: inconsistent PRs reviewed on github stats

[bsipocz]

First of all, thank you for this tool.

There is an inconsistency when compared to the web UI. I'm sorry for the screenshot, happy to help with follow-up troubleshooting if needed.

Status report for the week 39 (2024-09-23 to 2024-09-29).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Brigitta Sipőcz <[email protected]>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* Pull requests reviewed on github: 9
    * astropy/astroquery#3101 - Fix so that test products are downloaded to...
    * nasa-fornax/fornax-demo-notebooks#345 - added runtime and commented...
    * astropy/astroquery#3096 - Get list of unique products
    * astropy/pyvo#599 - Fix bug #543
    * astropy/astropy.github.com#617 - Change mention of conda (was: change...
    * Caltech-IPAC/irsa-tutorials#016 - Add notebooks for NEOWISE parquet...
    * astropy/pyvo#570 - Avoid assuming that `access_url` exists always
    * scipy-lectures/scientific-python-lectures#752 - Add MyPy type checking
    * astropy/astroquery#2288 - adding support for calibration queries

The over report is missing a couple of PRs that received reviews in this reporting period, but includes a couple of others that got merged this week, but I reviewed them weeks.

In fact, as I see, it's the recently closed or merged PRs are listed in the report, irrelevant to when the reviews were done for them instead of PRs with fresh reviews.

The latter is what's shown on the web UI, and that's the one I would like to have in the report.