You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The other day, I found another odd bug with the 9292-backend: some connections using the IC direct from Amsterdam Centraal to Schiphol or from Rotterdam Centraal to Schiphol do not have an arrival time (and any connection that has this as a partial connection has a faulty travel time). I noticed this first when I had a connection where the train arrived before it left the previous station... :-)
The other day, I found another odd bug with the 9292-backend: some connections using the IC direct from Amsterdam Centraal to Schiphol or from Rotterdam Centraal to Schiphol do not have an arrival time (and any connection that has this as a partial connection has a faulty travel time). I noticed this first when I had a connection where the train arrived before it left the previous station... :-)
I have not quite been able to find a pattern - the following connection is an example:
https://9292.nl/reisadvies/station-rotterdam-centraal/station-schiphol-airport/vertrek/2023-02-28T2254?extraInterchangeTime=0&flexStop=True&flexAddress=False
In Fahrplan, this connection is listed with "0:00" duration and no arrival time.
This connection is shown correctly in Fahrplan:
https://9292.nl/reisadvies/station-rotterdam-centraal/station-schiphol-airport/vertrek/2023-02-28T2315?extraInterchangeTime=0&flexStop=True&flexAddress=False
The only difference between the two that I can see is that one is "NS Intercity Direct" and the other "NS International Intercity Direct".
What is even more bizar: if I take the 22:54h connection from above and change it so that it ends in Amsterdam instead of Schiphol, it is displayed correctly in Fahrplan as well...
https://9292.nl/reisadvies/station-rotterdam-centraal/station-amsterdam-centraal/vertrek/2023-02-28T2254?extraInterchangeTime=0&flexStop=True&flexAddress=False
Hope you have more luck in finding a pattern... Thanks again!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: