You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
More general naming shenanigans. Since all of our subcommands generally will work on images I see no good reason to have this command contain images in the name. If we want to have non-image commands we have a few options:
More general naming shenanigans. Since all of our subcommands generally will work on images I see no good reason to have this command contain images in the name. If we want to have non-image commands we have a few options:
We could have:
image-builder build [image-type]
image-builder describe [image-type]
(see cmd: add newdescribe-image
command #9).image-builder list
Or alternatively we could have
-image
in all of them:image-builder build-image [image-type]
image-builder describe-image [image-type]
image-builder list-image
Or alternatively they can all exist under an
image
subcommand:image-builder image build [image-type]
image-builder image describe [image-type]
image-builder image list
Which one do you prefer?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: