Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for paravirtualized launch volume attachment #388

Open
kdw174 opened this issue Oct 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Add support for paravirtualized launch volume attachment #388

kdw174 opened this issue Oct 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@kdw174
Copy link

kdw174 commented Oct 17, 2024

What would you like to be added:
Recently support was added for configuring paravirtualized launch volume attachments at instance creation.

The cluster-api provider only supports iscsi launch volume attachments today.

Why is this needed:
We have a need for Ultra High Performance volumes that are created with the instance. Today, we have to create the instance with the volume and ISCSI attachment, then run post kubeadm commands to detach and reattach the volume as paravirtualized volume attachment. This would greatly simplify the setup required here by attaching the volume as a paravirtualized attachment at instance creation.

@kdw174 kdw174 added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 17, 2024
@eshneken
Copy link
Member

eshneken commented Dec 2, 2024

Is this enhancement for boot volumes or block volumes? Can you share a sample YAML snippet of how you create the cluster today with ISCSI?

@kdw174
Copy link
Author

kdw174 commented Dec 2, 2024

This is a block volume. Here's a snippet from an ocimachinetemplate

spec:
  template:
    spec:
      launchVolumeAttachments:
      - launchIscsiVolumeAttachment:
          device: /dev/oracleoci/oraclevdb
          launchCreateVolumeFromAttributes:
            sizeInGBs: 1500
            vpusPerGB: 60
        volumeType: iscsi

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants