You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For example: use the rc_verbs interface to transmit 11600 bytes of data, use the bcopy protocol at this time, and then am_bcopy<=8254, the data needs to be segmented.
I looked at the code, and each segment of data will call ibv_post_send once, that is to say wr->next=NULL, why not choose to add it to the postlist and send it once?
This means that every segmented message will ring the doorbell once, is there any advantage to doing this?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
For example: use the rc_verbs interface to transmit 11600 bytes of data, use the bcopy protocol at this time, and then am_bcopy<=8254, the data needs to be segmented.
I looked at the code, and each segment of data will call ibv_post_send once, that is to say wr->next=NULL, why not choose to add it to the postlist and send it once?
This means that every segmented message will ring the doorbell once, is there any advantage to doing this?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions