fix(page-setting): Use the meta options injection method to each component of the page module. #890
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the export structure in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/plugins/page/index.js (1)
20-20: Document the architectural change.
This change represents a significant architectural shift in how page-related APIs are exposed and consumed. Please update the documentation to:
- Explain the new meta options injection pattern
- Guide users on migrating from the old pageSettingApi to the new approach
- Document any new registry.options configuration required
Consider adding these details to:
- The plugin's README.md
- API documentation
- Migration guide if this is a breaking change
packages/plugins/page/src/PageSetting.vue (1)
136-136: Document the meta options injection feature.
The introduction of configurable lifecycle hooks through registry options is a significant architectural change that needs documentation. Please add:
- Documentation explaining how to configure
beforeCreatePagethrough registry options - Examples of common use cases
- TypeScript interfaces for the hook parameters and return type
Would you like me to help create a documentation template for this feature?
Also applies to: 182-184
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/plugins/page/index.js (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/page/src/PageSetting.vue (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/plugins/page/index.js (1)
20-20: Verify the removal of pageSettingApi surface.
The removal of pageSettingApi from the apis object could potentially break existing code that depends on these APIs. While the PR indicates this is part of moving to meta options injection, we should verify that all consumers are updated.
Let's check for any remaining usage of the removed APIs:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify if this change is safe by checking for any historical usage or related code:
Let me check one more crucial piece - the PageSetting.vue file since it's mentioned in the git history:
Let me check the Main.vue file since it's the source of the new api that's being used:
Based on the comprehensive code analysis, I can now provide a final response:
The removal of pageSettingApi is safe and properly migrated.
The changes are part of a valid architectural shift where:
- The
beforeCreatePagefunctionality has been correctly moved toregistry.optionsas seen in PageSetting.vue - The
apiexport from Main.vue contains all necessary page functionality - No direct usages of
pageSettingApiremain in the codebase - The change aligns with the meta options injection method mentioned in the PR objectives
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining usage of pageSettingApi methods
rg -l "pageSettingApi\." || echo "No direct pageSettingApi usage found"
# Search for potential consumers of the removed APIs through the plugin system
rg -l "plugins.*page.*api" || echo "No plugin API consumers found"
Length of output: 207
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check git history for pageSettingApi usage
git log -p | rg "pageSettingApi" || echo "No historical usage found"
# Look for any page API related imports/exports
rg -l "import.*api.*from.*page" || echo "No page API imports found"
# Search for beforeCreatePage references since it was mentioned in the context
rg "beforeCreatePage" -A 3 || echo "No beforeCreatePage references found"
# Check Main.vue for the api export mentioned in the change
fd -e vue Main.vue --exec cat {} || echo "No Main.vue found"
Length of output: 238
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check PageSetting.vue content
fd -g "*PageSetting.vue" --exec cat {} || echo "No PageSetting.vue found"
# Look for registry.options usage which should contain the migrated functionality
rg "registry\.options.*beforeCreatePage" -A 3 || echo "No registry.options usage found"
# Check for any current imports of PageSetting.vue
rg -l "from.*PageSetting" || echo "No imports of PageSetting found"
Length of output: 12703
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Main.vue content to see the exported api
fd -g "Main.vue" --exec cat {} || echo "No Main.vue found"
# Also check PageTree.vue since it imports from PageSetting
fd -g "PageTree.vue" --exec cat {} || echo "No PageTree.vue found"
Length of output: 203400
packages/plugins/page/src/PageSetting.vue (1)
136-136: Verify impact of removing beforeCreatePage from the exported API.
While moving beforeCreatePage to registry options improves flexibility, this is potentially a breaking change. External code that directly calls api.beforeCreatePage will need to be updated.
Let's verify the usage of the old API:
…age module;
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
beforeCreatePagemethod for cleaner code and improved functionality.Refactor