fix: add slots fail #1141
fix: add slots fail #1141
Conversation
修复 insert 方法因为 referTargetNode 找不到引起的报错，导致 slot 插槽增加失败
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@chilingling has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 26 minutes and 35 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe changes update the insertion logic used within the canvas API. Instead of relying on the loop index of the Changes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/canvas/DesignCanvas/src/api/useCanvas.js (1)
482-487: Simplify the position and referTargetNodeId logic.The current implementation has redundant conditional checks. The position and referTargetNodeId can be determined more concisely:
- if (newChildIndex === 0) { - position = 'before' - } else if (newChildIndex !== -1) { - position = 'after' - referTargetNodeId = newChildren[newChildIndex - 1]?.id - } + const position = newChildIndex === 0 ? 'before' : 'after' + const referTargetNodeId = newChildIndex > 0 ? newChildren[newChildIndex - 1]?.id : null
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/canvas/DesignCanvas/src/api/useCanvas.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/canvas/DesignCanvas/src/api/useCanvas.js (1)
475-511:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify the impact of the new insertion logic.
The changes modify how new children are inserted into the canvas. Please verify:
- The order of elements is preserved when inserting multiple children
- The reference node is correctly identified for each insertion
- Edge cases are handled properly (empty array, single element, etc.)
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for test files that verify the insertion logic fd -e spec.js -e test.js | grep -i "insert\|children\|canvas" # Search for related component usage rg -l "operateNode.*insert" --type jsLength of output: 178
Verify New Insertion Logic Impact
The recent changes in
packages/canvas/DesignCanvas/src/api/useCanvas.jsimpact how new children are inserted. Please ensure that:
- Order Preservation: When inserting multiple children, the order remains as defined by the
newChildrenarray.- Reference Node Accuracy: The logic correctly identifies the reference node for each insertion—using
newChildIndexand the preceding node innewChildren—especially at the start and for subsequent elements.- Edge-Case Handling: Situations like an empty children array or a single element insertion are correctly managed.
Our repository search only identified usage in
packages/configurator/src/container-configurator/ContainerConfigurator.vueand did not return dedicated test files addressing these points. It is advisable to verify these behaviors through manual checks or by adding/updating unit tests to cover these scenarios.
|
@CodeRabbit review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
【问题描述】
感谢 @yanmou1995 反馈。
【问题分析】
PR #1055 新功能引入的 bug。
当 referTargetNodeId 不存在时，会报错。不继续执行后续的插入逻辑。
而插槽的开启功能使用了
updateAttribute方法，错误传递了当前的 nodeId 为 referTargetNodeId，导致报错，无法插入插槽。【解决方案】
增加逻辑判断新插入节点的位置，正确传递 referTargetNodeId。
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: #1134
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit