Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Package Comparison and Overlap Analysis #37

Open
darupp opened this issue Apr 15, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Package Comparison and Overlap Analysis #37

darupp opened this issue Apr 15, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@darupp
Copy link
Collaborator

darupp commented Apr 15, 2019

Until now, GOKb lacks a tool for package comparison/overlap analysis.

Functionality from LAS:eR could be adopted.

@darupp darupp added the on hold label Apr 15, 2019
@croqueGrec09
Copy link
Contributor

As mentionned by @darupp, a similar functionality needs to be implemented in LAS:eR as well. Since only a very few users can access the LAS:eR issues, progresses documented in the LAS:eR issue will be documented here as well.

To work completely, the LAS:eR issue should be described in short here as well (unfortunately, referencing the LAS:eR issue does not make any sense as it is not accessible by most GOKb users):
For subscription issue entitlements and packages, it is desired to create a view which compares (for the moment) exactly two objects. A side-by-side view of the TIPPs/issue entitlements should be generated which shows the differences between two (subscription) packages.

State of LAS:eR issue as of April 15th: on hold

@croqueGrec09 croqueGrec09 self-assigned this Apr 15, 2019
@croqueGrec09
Copy link
Contributor

In LAS:eR, the title comparison function has been implemented by @Moetez16 for a subscription holding; the method created there may be interesting for the GOKb.

@hornmo hornmo self-assigned this Oct 6, 2020
@hornmo
Copy link
Collaborator

hornmo commented Oct 6, 2020

I did some work on the comparison logic on branch feature-package-compare already. We may also want a dedicated view for this, and might consider the handling of very big Packages a bit more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants