Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarification for HeatingSystem.heatpump_low_shutoff_temperature #298

Closed
KarenWGard opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Comments

@KarenWGard
Copy link

the HeatingSystem.heatpump_low_shutoff_temperature is used to determine whether the heat pump is allowed to operate at the same time as auxiliary heat. ASHRAE 90.1 RCT Rule 23-17 is currently using -56F as a cutoff temperature at or below which, heatpumps are considered to be operating continuously even when there is auxiliary heat. -56F is the lowest recorded temperature in a habitable area of the USA in the last 10-years (Cotton, Minnesota - January 27, 2019). There are arguments for using other temperatures:

-80F is the coldest recorded temperature in recent years in a habitable place... Yakustk, Russia - January 18, 2023
−459.67 F ... nothing colder.

The discussion about exactly what temperature the low number should be is purely academic, because no normal heat pump will have any capacity at these temperatures, but a number should be selected and communicated in the schema.

@JasonGlazer
Copy link
Collaborator

I am adding to the note:

For heat pumps with no lower temperature limit, this value should not be provided or set to -999.

This assumes that we have rules and RCT functionality that test for the presence of a data element value.

This will be included in 0.1.1

@claperle
Copy link
Collaborator

claperle commented Dec 5, 2024

I am adding to the note:

For heat pumps with no lower temperature limit, this value should not be provided or set to -999.

This assumes that we have rules and RCT functionality that test for the presence of a data element value.

This will be included in 0.1.1

@JasonGlazer I like that more elegant solution!

@KarenWGard
Copy link
Author

KarenWGard commented Dec 5, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants