diff --git a/meetings/2025-01-14/minutes.md b/meetings/2025-01-14/minutes.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6916bff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meetings/2025-01-14/minutes.md
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# OQS Technical Steering Committee meeting – 2025-01-14 – minutes
+
+
+## Attendees
+* Christian Paquin
+* Basil Hess
+* Douglas Stebila
+* Spencer Wilson
+* Norman Ashley
+* Vlad Gheorghiu
+- Hart Montgomery
+- Steve Derezinski
+- Muria Roberts
+* Michael Baentsch
+
+## Agenda
+
+(see [agenda](./agenda.md))
+
+1. Chair's introduction
+2. Approve agenda
+3. Appoint minute-taker
+ - Michael Baentsch
+4. Review action items from previous meeting (if any)
+ - Security response team: Agreement on time-based assignment rotation; Everyone invited to provide feedback and bring merge-readiness in the next days to https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/tsc/pull/124
+ - Binary distributions: Douglas to reach out to Nigel where he's at on this collection
+5. Reports
+ - TAC: No meetings since last OQS meeting.
+ - PQCP: alpha release done for mlkem-native; effort underway by Basil to use this to replace PQCrystals and PQClean upstream code bases; PQClean project largely inactive (Douglas opinion); no activity on ML-DSA. 
+6. SLH-DSA:
+ - No clear consensus as to whether it's worth while adding this to OQS; decision postponed
+7. Status of sub projects
+ - Several projects pruned by Douglas
+ - Input solicited on https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/tsc/issues/2 to further gain clarity on project status and goals
+ - Agreement that two tables would help discussions going forward: sub-project/status and algorithm/status
+ - Norm raises question whether status decision is "top-down" (from PQCA to OQS) or "bottom-up" decision: Hart confirms that status would not have to be aligned with TAC nomenclature/life-cycle document: It's for the sub projects to decide their status/readiness, not for PQCA GB or TAC; PQCA TAC only would reign in over-promising maintainers but not over-promise itself.
+8. Ongoing discussion of research track / production track
+ - Agreement that OQS is "a long way off" (Douglas) a "commercially supported" piece of software
+ - Norm suggested work on criteria for dropping usage warnings; Christian seconded, suggesting clear cut statements what the project does, but also highlighting it's a "best effort" project only
+ - General agreement that it would need more commitment, particularly by the commercial entities to improve OQS; Hart and Douglas to take this to the GB
+ - General consensus that the committer base must be broadened
+9. Other business.
+ - Agreement to try to bring more NIST on-ramp algorithm authors to contribute (Hart already reaching out; Basil pointing out that second round closes in February; Douglas stating his reach out had limited success)
+
+## Recording location
+
+https://zoom.us/rec/play/IPSmAkjbn5GQUvMABr07sCcRQbdaM_BkSzKdFkRgMq1mw44eDWMMngb_M9q-pjyM5Pxu4SbQcKA3wqeU.Q8R9bS0JafkWem3l