You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I integrated your code into [1]. I have not pushed it yet, because I see interesting performance numbers.
I am trying basically to squeeze about 1GB of data from a SHAKE instance. For that I am using a system with a RISC-V Spacemit X60. This has the vector extensions, but not the Zvbb extensions.
I see the following numbers:
plain C implementation: 26s
Your keccak-vector.c after static constify the applicable variables: 2m17s
Same, but with -funroll-loops: 2m20s
Same, but with -funroll-all-loops: 2m30s
Your keccak-vector-multi-round.c: 3m40s
I have to admit, I am a bit surprised by the numbers.
I integrated your code into [1]. I have not pushed it yet, because I see interesting performance numbers.
I am trying basically to squeeze about 1GB of data from a SHAKE instance. For that I am using a system with a RISC-V Spacemit X60. This has the vector extensions, but not the Zvbb extensions.
I see the following numbers:
plain C implementation: 26s
Your keccak-vector.c after static constify the applicable variables: 2m17s
Same, but with -funroll-loops: 2m20s
Same, but with -funroll-all-loops: 2m30s
Your keccak-vector-multi-round.c: 3m40s
I have to admit, I am a bit surprised by the numbers.
[1] https://github.com/smuellerDD/leancrypto
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: