Lamda version on Where on one-to-many and many-to-many should apply conventions

[hazzik]

I have following mapping:

HasMany(x => x.Items).Where(x => x.IsDeleted == false);

It is translated to SQL like WHERE (items0_.IsDeleted = 0)
It is incorrect In case I'm using convention which converts camel case to underscores notation (eg. IsDeleted -> IS_DELETED).

So, correct sql should be (WHERE items0_.IS_DELTED = 0)