You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I'm a new user and I've tried the pipeline using bam files from a tumor-normal pair with the notation for chromosomes not including the 'chr' particle. After running it, I got results from Virusbreakend, flagstats and bamtools metrics, but all the other tasks failed. I am wondering if this could be due to the bams notation (I saw intermediate files use 'chr') and if there is a way to solve it apart from changing the bam files. Thanks!
Hi @PaulaOteroS, thanks for the question. If you're using a custom GRCh38 reference, the contig names must be prefixed with 'chr'. More generally it is strongly recommended to use the Hartwig-distributed reference genomes rather than a custom one.
If you can tell me more about your data and whether it's feasible for you to run oncoanalyser analyses from FASTQ, I can provide some further suggestions.
Description of the bug
Hi, I'm a new user and I've tried the pipeline using bam files from a tumor-normal pair with the notation for chromosomes not including the 'chr' particle. After running it, I got results from Virusbreakend, flagstats and bamtools metrics, but all the other tasks failed. I am wondering if this could be due to the bams notation (I saw intermediate files use 'chr') and if there is a way to solve it apart from changing the bam files. Thanks!
Command used and terminal output
Relevant files
No response
System information
nextflow/23.04.2
Hardware: HPC
Executor: slurm and local
Container engine: Singularity
Version of nf-core/oncoanalyser: 0.4.5
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: