You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's very common to copy down an exact phrasing from above but just invert it, maybe we offer a button that does that explicitly.
14.a) Alternatively, maybe this is the sign that all points should have both an endorse (YES) button and counter (NO) action, so that it's not necessary to create inverse points.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's very common to copy down an exact phrasing from above but just invert it, maybe we offer a button that does that explicitly.
that's anti-signal. what value does having both of those adds to the discussion? just adds redundancy
Alternatively, maybe this is the sign that all points should have both an endorse (YES) button and counter (NO) action, so that it's not necessary to create inverse points.
yes, this hints at the need for some different kind of entity that encodes that more precisely. could be the Question nodes we discussed at some point. more specifically, an Yes/No kind of question.
this is probably the kind of entity where we would want to plug prediction markets.
but then again, we still need to figure out how that would work
It's very common to copy down an exact phrasing from above but just invert it, maybe we offer a button that does that explicitly.
14.a) Alternatively, maybe this is the sign that all points should have both an endorse (YES) button and counter (NO) action, so that it's not necessary to create inverse points.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: