Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

It's very common to copy down an exact phrasing from above but just invert it #76

Open
Tracked by #60
volkyeth opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 1 comment
Open
Tracked by #60

Comments

@volkyeth
Copy link
Member

volkyeth commented Jan 9, 2025

It's very common to copy down an exact phrasing from above but just invert it, maybe we offer a button that does that explicitly.
image

14.a) Alternatively, maybe this is the sign that all points should have both an endorse (YES) button and counter (NO) action, so that it's not necessary to create inverse points.

@volkyeth
Copy link
Member Author

volkyeth commented Jan 9, 2025

@connormcmk

It's very common to copy down an exact phrasing from above but just invert it, maybe we offer a button that does that explicitly.

that's anti-signal. what value does having both of those adds to the discussion? just adds redundancy

Alternatively, maybe this is the sign that all points should have both an endorse (YES) button and counter (NO) action, so that it's not necessary to create inverse points.

yes, this hints at the need for some different kind of entity that encodes that more precisely. could be the Question nodes we discussed at some point. more specifically, an Yes/No kind of question.

this is probably the kind of entity where we would want to plug prediction markets.

but then again, we still need to figure out how that would work

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant