New execution approach #53
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Colleagues, set PR to develop and fix package name please. |
|
Colleagues, resolve conflicts please. |
|
@akme sorry, guys, we do not have enough time to fix all merge conflicts and make fixes you want. |
|
@akme By the way: I used this new approach for a while and it works well |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi! I've rewrite execution and Sync, based on
@extraparams to match request and responseI've tested this for a while
This PR not ready to merge "as it", but if you agree with this approach, I can modify package name (varche1 => mercuryoio)