You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was wondering if the issue of de-identification of state/province/county level data has arisen at all? There are a few ways to handle this, and having an ontology define some of these as standards would be an interesting way to go. E.g. enabling state level data to be grouped more generally into categories like "Western USA", "Eastern seaboard, USA", etc. ; Or european countries to be associated with a "Europe" grouping.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I was wondering if the issue of de-identification of state/province/county level data has arisen at all? There are a few ways to handle this, and having an ontology define some of these as standards would be an interesting way to go. E.g. enabling state level data to be grouped more generally into categories like "Western USA", "Eastern seaboard, USA", etc. ; Or european countries to be associated with a "Europe" grouping.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: