Question: can the library tell me if the website is a good candidate for extraction?

[NinoSkopac]

Howdy.

https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/102524/one-of-my-subordinates-child-passed-away-how-can-i-inform-my-team => skips the original post
https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/102692/how-to-deal-with-flaws-in-tests-of-potential-employers => skips everything

Is there a way to ask the library "hey, what do you think how did you do regarding extracting the content for this URL?" or, more plainly, "how confident are you that the content you extracted is relevant?" ? Something like an overall score?

That way, I could fall back to my internal text extraction algorithm.

Nino

[NinoSkopac]

Duplicate of #78