[DOCS] Dead Link in Readme

[alexfornuto]

Is there an existing issue for this?

• I have searched the existing issues

Current Behavior

The readme file has the following point in the last line of the "Using fail2ban" section:

A list of commands can be found here: https://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/Commands

Unfortunately, the link is dead and there seems to be no current list of all commands on their GitHub wiki. The closest thing I could find is where the commands are built into the code, or else I would have PR'd a fix.

It's a shame that the upstream project's documentation is not as complete as it was in the past. The best thing this project can do is probably to just remove the line, unless there's other documentation I'm missing.

Expected Behavior

No response

Steps To Reproduce

Oh good, the template has all these required fields.

Environment

No response

CPU architecture

x86-64

Docker creation

I guess I'll use them to suggest that you make a new template.

Container logs

One for documentation issues, that doesn't require all these fields. Maybe has some new ones, like referencing the page with the problem, and suggesting a fix.

[LinuxServer-CI]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. This might be due to missing feedback from OP. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[alexfornuto]

It's going stale because it hasn't been responded to by the project, it is not (AFAIK) waiting on feedback from me.

[LinuxServer-CI]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. This might be due to missing feedback from OP. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[alexfornuto]

It's going stale because it hasn't been responded to by the project, it is not (AFAIK) waiting on feedback from me.

[alexfornuto]

Any interest into my suggested template updates?

[thespad]

This was included in #534

[drizuid]

believe OP is asking about the issue template which assumes every issue is related to a container, rather than potentially documentation, like this.

[alexfornuto]

believe OP is asking about the issue template which assumes every issue is related to a container, rather than potentially documentation, like this.

You are correct, sir!

[thespad]

Ah. It's something we could look at, we don't get many docs related issues but it's not a huge amount of work to distribute a new template. We'll discuss it and see if it makes sense to do.

[alexfornuto]

Consider this: The absence of a documentation template may discourage potential issues from being logged.