Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multiple timespans #581

Open
azaroth42 opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Multiple timespans #581

azaroth42 opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
discuss Discussion of this topic needed model The issue relates to the linked open data model priority The issue is high priority for coming to a solution
Milestone

Comments

@azaroth42
Copy link
Collaborator

Question from call on 2024-03-20:

Please could we talk about TimeSpan and what to do when you have a group record (such as an archival collection record) that has multiple assigned timespans, for example, multiple actors associated with the collection, and separately entered multiple timespans, but no information about which timespan goes with which actor (i.e. information that may overall make sense to a human but which is challenging to model semantically when a lot of the nuance is missing) – how can these multiple timespans be modelled in Linked.Art – partitioning of a TimeSpan doesn’t seem to be semantically correct nor currently possible according to the model – merging the individual timespans into a singular begin_of_the_begin and end_of_the_end is a partial option (choosing the earliest part all the dates for the begin and the latest part of all the dates for the end), but this approach loses a lot of resolution from the data.

@azaroth42 azaroth42 added model The issue relates to the linked open data model question labels Apr 2, 2024
@azaroth42 azaroth42 added this to the Questions milestone Apr 2, 2024
@azaroth42
Copy link
Collaborator Author

A similar scenario is a group that forms, is dissolved, and then reformed.

@azaroth42 azaroth42 added priority The issue is high priority for coming to a solution discuss Discussion of this topic needed and removed question labels Jul 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discuss Discussion of this topic needed model The issue relates to the linked open data model priority The issue is high priority for coming to a solution
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant