Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

048 conversion only supports marc codes in subfield a, not subfield b or 2. #256

Open
kirkhess opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@kirkhess
Copy link
Contributor

The way the codes are mapped in marc2bibframe2, the codes are extracted from subfield a and subfield b into bf:instrument bf:ensemble, or bf:voice with textual labels not codes. While subfield 2 and ind2=7 is ignored, the source is hardcoded.

When they come through bibframe2marc, only subfield a is supported along with ind2=blank; no subfield b or subfield 2 are created. WC has about 600k v048$b. There's about ~3k v048$2, and in that case ind2 would be 7; so for example, the IAML medium of performance codes wouldn't work with the lookup table.

A tweak to use bf:code instead of strings, and mapping bf:source should fix ind2=7 & $2; a soloists property/class may or may not be needed for $b support, perhaps "not bf:ensemble" will work?

@jodiw01
Copy link
Contributor

jodiw01 commented Dec 4, 2024

The MARC-to-BIBFRAME conversion of the 048 and 382 fields needs further review and reconciliation with the PMO Medium of Performance ontology.

@jodiw01 jodiw01 transferred this issue from lcnetdev/bibframe2marc Dec 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants