https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.6583
A new method to distinguish hadronically decaying boosted Z bosons from W bosons using the ATLAS detector
ATLAS Collaboration (This was Larry's first ATLAS Editorial Board for a paper actually...)
https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.04939
This effect was pointed out in https://cds.cern.ch/record/2053189/files/Eur.%20Phys.%20J.%20C%2076%20(2016)%20238.pdf but without really getting into it and how it might be a useful handle at high pT.
Andrew J. Larkoski, Eric M. Metodiev
https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.01639
Andy Buckley, Giuseppe Callea, Andrew J. Larkoski, Simone Marzani
https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.10480
This is really trying to get at the same thing. But misses the pT scale of the fragmentation and the relevant frames.
Christopher Frye, Andrew J. Larkoski, Jesse Thaler, Kevin Zhou
https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.06266
An IRC-safe multiplicity definition we may want to look into...
Patrick T. Komiske (MIT, Cambridge, CTP), Eric M. Metodiev (MIT, Cambridge, CTP), Jesse Thaler (MIT, Cambridge, CTP)
https://inspirehep.net/literature/1692770
https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0212264.pdf
https://inspirehep.net/literature/929709
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.00391.pdf
https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.09650
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.00008.pdf
"Of course, there are well-known caveats to this picture of jet generation, which go under the name of “sample dependence”. For instance, “quark” jets from the Z+jet process are not exactly identical to “quark” jets from the dijet process due to soft color correlations with the entire event [37], though these correlations are power suppressed in the small-jet-radius limit [41–43]."
"Here, we assume that sample-dependent effects can either be quantified or mitigated, taking Eq. (2) as the starting assumption for our analysis."