Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using pixy without an all sites VCF? #100

Open
milesandersonmn opened this issue Mar 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Using pixy without an all sites VCF? #100

milesandersonmn opened this issue Mar 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@milesandersonmn
Copy link

I have a fairly mundane need for pi and fst estimates that are in the ballpark but not necessarily the most accurate possible. We have a huge number of samples that I don't have the time or resources to generate individual gvcfs for. Can I use pixy on a standard VCF without calling all sites? Is there anything I should know when doing this?

If not are there any tools you all might recommend as an alternative?

Thanks!

@milesandersonmn milesandersonmn added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Mar 18, 2024
@ksamuk
Copy link
Owner

ksamuk commented Mar 18, 2024

Hi Miles,

There isn't a quick way around the missing data issue for pi/dxy, I'm afraid. All tools, including pixy, will give you biased estimates in the absence of an all-sites VCF. Note that FST doesn't have the same issue, and any tool will work for that.

The only alternative to the true 'all-sites' workflow that I am aware of is to use mop (https://github.com/RILAB/mop) on your BAM files, and use those results to ballpark the denominators for the estimates.

Sorry that I can't be of more help.

Kieran

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants