Replies: 1 comment
-
You're correct, I was using the HA term for the class vs alignment to Free@Home. I'm good with this proposal and I'll convert this into an issue. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Currently the switch deviceclass represents a switch_actuator in F@H so it seems that it follows the HA entity naming.
I propose to align the deviceclass naming to the functionID naming to have a better differantiation between the different channels and the possibility to react on different datapoints in F@H (which might all be the same in HA).
E.g.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions