-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clear cases of non-recombinants #346
Comments
XAU Image from Yan copied from #285. |
XBQ and XBK Image from Yan copied from #285. |
XBE Image from Yan copied from #285. |
I think XN should be here also? |
Yes, but it has its own issue. |
XN Image from Yan copied from #285. |
I see - I got confused when this was titled "Clear cases of non recombinant" and it was omitted though. |
I was hoping that we could gather evidence for each of these cases in separate threads (optionally with some linking issues) so that we could easily find them and add to them. This is basically the same as #285 now. |
I thought we separate the clear cases from the less clear cases, for which we have a separate issue each? |
We could just close this and retitle #285? |
We need to list out the evidence somewhere for why we think something is not a recombinant, all we have at the moment is a few pictures which are hard to collate. I want to have, for each thing which disagrees with pango ground truth:
So we're using these issue to collate information in a way that's findable and extendable. We can then make qualitative judgements about things that are definitely one other or another later on. I think #337, #338, #338 and #339 are are a great start on this. |
Okay, closing this and starting issues for each non-recombinant. |
Discussion started with XN in #285 and then with these other Pango X.
XAU
XBQ
XBK (XBK.1)
XBE
Quoting Yan here in #285:
"No clear recombination, and no reversions etc on the nearby branches. Unless there is a deletion we are missing, I suppose."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: