You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Yes, I've have been meaning to do something about this. The biggest difference between that paper and mine is that in their tests, they let the solver run for 1 hour. In my tests, I only let it run a few seconds. I was under (the probably false) assumption that if it couldn't find a solution in a few seconds, it couldn't find one at all. I need to try out longer solve times.
There are, of course, other differences in the way the cube is represented, the way it is trained, and the type of neural network. However, if I were to guess, the amount of time given to solve a cube is the largest difference.
Yeah. As you say, we just didn't think about the long time running for finding a solution.
Actually, I'm a freshman in this area. I haven't even try your solution. I asked them for the public code two days ago. But it seems that they don't want to lease the code.
Please update your Github if good results come. I'm trying hard to understand your idea.
Solving the Rubik's Cube Without Human Knowledge
Stephen McAleer, Forest Agostinelli, Alexander Shmakov, Pierre Baldi
(Submitted on 18 May 2018)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: