Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

支持B站(和A站)的运动轨迹 #30

Open
jabbany opened this issue Jul 22, 2014 · 9 comments
Open

支持B站(和A站)的运动轨迹 #30

jabbany opened this issue Jul 22, 2014 · 9 comments
Labels

Comments

@jabbany
Copy link
Owner

jabbany commented Jul 22, 2014

<d p="62.982,7,250,16777215,1385859128,0,a792d9fc,351202339">[655,188,"1-1",0.3,"爱",0,0,655,188,1100,0,false,"黑体",1,"M152,84L152,83L153,83L153,84L154,84L154,85L156,86L156,88L159,92L161,94L162,96L164,98L166,100L167,101L168,101L169,101L170,103L171,104L172,105L173,106"]</d>

最后一个参数疑似是路径参数(M:moveTo,L:lineTo)?

M152,84L152,83L153,83L153,84L154,84L154,85L156,86L156,88L159,92L161,94L162,96L164,98L166,100L167,101L168,101L169,101L170,103L171,104L172,105L173,106

难道现在高级弹幕里面可以内嵌SVG了?还是说定义运动路径?文字沿着路径排布?

有待研究。

@TundraWork
Copy link

AVid?

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 29, 2014

这东西应该是M7的路径跟随

@jabbany
Copy link
Owner Author

jabbany commented Jul 29, 2014

原来如此。。。

@jabbany jabbany changed the title B站新格式? 支持B站(和A站)的运动轨迹 Jul 29, 2014
@jabbany
Copy link
Owner Author

jabbany commented Jul 29, 2014

@Akaza-Akari 感觉相关文档不多,不知道路径是怎么控制运动时间的。。。是不是说在总的duration内,匀速通过整个路径?

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 29, 2014

@jabbany 的确是这样的

@jabbany
Copy link
Owner Author

jabbany commented Jul 30, 2014

原来如此,看来解析器还得计算路径长度。。。。

@TundraWork
Copy link

一开始就询问AVid了,我去找到客户端弹幕引擎开发人员,要求提供AVid确认效果。

@jabbany
Copy link
Owner Author

jabbany commented Jul 30, 2014

我忘了。。。。好像是 《Outer Science》 某个带高级弹幕版本里面的某一个节选。。。

@jabbany
Copy link
Owner Author

jabbany commented Sep 1, 2014

在新的 dev-modularize 分支下有此实验性支持。不知道B站官方播放器似乎自带Easing?情况不明。

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants