You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
1/ Yearly evolution of the number of observations per river basin both for emerging and widespread species (= KPI)
Maybe 3 separate graphs : 1/ alert list species, 2/ emerging EU listed species and 3/ widespread EU listed species
2/ Rate of increase of surveillance at RSU scale (# yearly observation records) in comparing baseline period (2000-2015) with enhanced surveillance period (2021-2022) => to be visualised through a dedicated map to identify potential surveillance gaps.
-> Comparing surveillance between two maps: one baseline and one current state? Maybe a map considering as an indicator the ratio between the # yearly observation records from 2021 onwards divided by the #yearly observations records between 2000 and 2015 (= baseline) for each RSU. With a colour gradient from red to green depending on the ratio (red when more observations/year during the baseline period).
Maybe interesting to make also the distinction between priority RSUs and non-priority RSUs for surveillance from the surveillance plan?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Based on email conversations with Etienne:
1/ Yearly evolution of the number of observations per river basin both for emerging and widespread species (= KPI)
Maybe 3 separate graphs : 1/ alert list species, 2/ emerging EU listed species and 3/ widespread EU listed species
2/ Rate of increase of surveillance at RSU scale (# yearly observation records) in comparing baseline period (2000-2015) with enhanced surveillance period (2021-2022) => to be visualised through a dedicated map to identify potential surveillance gaps.
-> Comparing surveillance between two maps: one baseline and one current state? Maybe a map considering as an indicator the ratio between the # yearly observation records from 2021 onwards divided by the #yearly observations records between 2000 and 2015 (= baseline) for each RSU. With a colour gradient from red to green depending on the ratio (red when more observations/year during the baseline period).
Maybe interesting to make also the distinction between priority RSUs and non-priority RSUs for surveillance from the surveillance plan?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: