-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ISA: Eric Vyncke comments #159
Labels
Comments
Discussion of 1) https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bpf/yI3vl12akSke2KfVR7g2pKfglog/ |
Proposed patch posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bpf/G0yjlzZ4GazyQC2gN0jW8YjqGkk/ |
dthaler
added a commit
to dthaler/ebpf-docs-1
that referenced
this issue
Jun 24, 2024
Addresses ietf-wg-bpf#156 ietf-wg-bpf#159 ietf-wg-bpf#160 Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <[email protected]>
dthaler
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 24, 2024
Addresses #156 #159 #160 Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <[email protected]>
Fixed in draft -04 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
COMMENT:
Nice document, easy to read and understand and the shepherd's write-up
companion is also clear.
Just two COMMENTs (no need to reply, but replies will be appreciated):
like Gunter, having an expansion to "eBPF is related or is the successor of
extended Berkeley Packet Filter" would comfort the readers about what they are
reading.
I find puzzling the absence of betoh16() in the presence of htobe16()
functions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: