Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi, Based on your description, there are multiple interpretations of how you actually coded this using Thanks, Ian |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello
I have a question relating to predicting locations.
I have tag data (ARGOS and GPS) from North Atlantic Right Whales in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Mean/median time between subsequent positions is 40/22min. I fitted rw, crw, mp models with different time steps and max speed. The osar residuals for the ‘mp’ (1-hour time step, 2m/s max speed) model looked ‘best’. The predicted locations fit the raw GPS data well.
I have also 14,000 dives, and I wanted to predict their locations and, in a further step, add the information to inform an hMM to help distinguish between the behavioural states. But first, I wanted to plot them. I used the best-performing model ‘mp’ and the data frame with the start times for every dive. However, while most dives fall somewhat within the range of the path of the mp model (using 1-hour predictions), I have some dives dozens or even hundreds of km away, further away than even the most extreme ARGOS position (and should not be possible given the 2m/s max speed). I repeated the same exercise with the ‘crw’ model, and it worked. The dives were all very close to the path of the 1-hour prediction of the same model. I do not understand why. I can simply use the ‘crw’ model, but the residuals of the ‘mp’ model looked better, although, in the end, I will likely not use the estimated move persistence of the mp model.
Many thanks for any suggestions.
Chris
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions