You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 20, 2024. It is now read-only.
We want to know what GrGeom*Loops (right now, GrGeomInLoops) are parallelizable, and what are common features that make them not parallelizable currently.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Likely same issues in problem_ic_phase_pressure.org.c, but I don't think that file is used.
problem_mannings.c:L192
x is assigned but unused. is it used later? Unlikely, but concerning.
problem_phase_rel_perm.c:L1060 1163
some VanGLookupSpline thing
problem_phase_rel_perm.c:L1655
use of for loop; looks like reduction to index owned array variable
problem_phsae_rel_permc:L199
x is assigned but unused. is it used later? Unlikely, but concerning.
this kind of situation happens a lot, and I am likely to miss them.
problem_real_space_z.c:L133
use of goto (which is immediately below), but is unconditional. Seems like this could be rewritten as something else.
problem_saturation.c:L565 584
use of for loop; looks like reduction to index owned array variable. does not use variables that are (at least from this perspective) also written by this loop.
richards_jacobia_eval.c:L596
Scatter pattern similar to NL_function_eval
solver_richards.c:L2635
side effect: printf
tuning_bandsRF.c:L243
doing_TB is assigned (unconditionally to 1) and used after loop
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
We want to know what GrGeom*Loops (right now, GrGeomInLoops) are parallelizable, and what are common features that make them not parallelizable currently.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: