Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use of 'collection object' in definitions #127

Open
acvaughan opened this issue Nov 7, 2016 · 6 comments
Open

Use of 'collection object' in definitions #127

acvaughan opened this issue Nov 7, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@acvaughan
Copy link

There are a lot of references to 'collection object' in the definitions. I think it's confusing to use terminology that doesn't correspond to a HISPID term. Can we change these to 'preservedSpecimen' and note in preservedSpecimen that it corresponds to what is often referred to as a 'collection object'?

@acvaughan
Copy link
Author

Perhaps also change the 'specimen' references to 'preservedSpecimen' as well, e.g. 'List of preparations from a specimen'.

It would probably mean we'd have to change 'A description of the habit or life form of the specimen on which the collection object is based' (lifeForm) to 'A description of the habit or life form of the organism that forms the basis of the preservedSpecimen', but I think 'organism' is better than 'specimen' here, regardless.

@acvaughan
Copy link
Author

Now I'm not sure about this. I still think it's best to reference other terms/properties to avoid ambiguity in what we're talking about. But specimen vs preservedSpecimen is tricky for properties that can or do relate to the specimen before it's probably been preserved, e.g. locality: currently "Description of the locality from where the specimen was collected" (let's delete "from") - my earlier suggestion of changing this to "Description of the locality where the preservedSpecimen was collected" doesn't make logical sense.

@acvaughan
Copy link
Author

I'm starting to think that "collection object" is the best to use (from a conceptual point of view), but perhaps we include a note on terminology of definitions and usage notes in the introduction?

@nielsklazenga
Copy link
Member

I think collection object has the same issues as preservedSpecimen, perhaps even more so. They are both too specific and hence become inaccurate when taken outside the herbarium. A general term like 'specimen' might be vague, but that is not always a bad thing.

@nielsklazenga
Copy link
Member

I think this is partly covered in issue #129, not only because the example is from a property in the Location class. So, following Ben's suggestion there, use PreservedSpecimen (it starts with a capital, because it is a class) when talking about the class. Total avoidance would still be better of course. Elsewhere, 'specimen' is probably best. I think we use the word to much though. We could use 'collecting event' every now and then when appropriate.

@acvaughan
Copy link
Author

Sounds like a good approach to me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants