Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
For reference here is my adapted config.ini which works with the data provided. Note that the inverters have been shifted around to represend the order provided in the data.
` |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Minor Update: BUT in fact the order they are reported in is 6, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 . It seems that OpenDTU follows its own logic in which order the inverters are to be reported in. HOWEVER the attribute "order" is a reliable indicator that represents the order in which the inverters are configured within the OpenDTU GUI. Just as a heads up ;-) Best Regards |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello,
it may be a peculiarity of my version of OpenDTU, but I have noticed, that the configurated inverters are reported in the following order:
last inverter, first inverter, second inverter, ... , second to last inverter. In other words: the last inverter is the first in the list of inverters.
However: there is an attribute that could be used untangle this mess. It is called "order"
Please see OpenDTU Data:
As you can see the order of inverters in the data is B3,A1,A2,A3,B1,B2 instead of A1,A2,A3,B1,B2,B3. Accordingly the order attribute the "order" attribute is 5,0,1,2,3,4
This messes up the config along with the association of the phases. I COULD move the 6th inverter to the first spot in the config and would fix this issue. However once more inverters are added to the config I would have to rearrange the invertes again.
Maybe the "order" attribute could be used to determine the order of inverters from the data stream instead of the order of appearance?
As I said it is not really a serious issue for me, but I thought I'd share my findings here.
Thanks for your great work, and best Regards,
Daniel
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions