-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Risks
Stefan Piatek edited this page Jul 8, 2022
·
7 revisions
this month | last month | weeks on list | risk | risk resolution |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | 3 | FHIR data model changing | reviewing of new example FHIR bundle and agree the canonical version. Later, create some JSON validators that will specifically check that all required resources and fields are populated. Final option would be to have a gold standard report so that all data sources can ensure consistency of mapping from input form -> FHIR bundle. |
2 | - | 2 | prototype used as production application | Allow for rounds of iteration when summer student starts and dedicate time to allowing edge cases to be worked on. |
3 | 1 | 12 | creeping requirements | review of requirements every 2 weeks, order by value and push down nice to haves until all high priority issues are completed |
4 | 2 | 12 | nothing useful released | agile development, constantly releasing usable code rather than goldplated. Would still like to have an end user of this to demo and get feedback from |
5 | 3 | 12 | released software has low quality | disciplined development practices (version control, review, tests and CI). End user sign off would be useful as well |
6 | 4 | 12 | no visibility on project progress | create a visible project board, ideally write code in the open and under an open source license, but should discuss |
Resolved risks:
this month | last month | weeks on list | risk | risk resolution |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0 | 4 | too much time spent on investigation | review work mid May to ensure a demo-able form with no frills |
5 | 0 | 8 | integration with fhir | straight to using fhir API rather than intermediate bundle which may not be correct |