From db9b65b80ffab503a5e987a4cff0f89662f701ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "dependabot-preview[bot]"
<27856297+dependabot-preview[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 17:29:02 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 001/749] [Security] Bump activesupport from 6.0.2.1 to 6.0.3.1
Bumps [activesupport](https://github.com/rails/rails) from 6.0.2.1 to 6.0.3.1. **This update includes a security fix.**
- [Release notes](https://github.com/rails/rails/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/v6.0.3.1/activesupport/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](https://github.com/rails/rails/compare/v6.0.2.1...v6.0.3.1)
Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot]
---
Gemfile.lock | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Gemfile.lock b/Gemfile.lock
index 86d4efefbc6..a81214f5996 100644
--- a/Gemfile.lock
+++ b/Gemfile.lock
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
GEM
remote: https://rubygems.org/
specs:
- activesupport (6.0.2.1)
+ activesupport (6.0.3.1)
concurrent-ruby (~> 1.0, >= 1.0.2)
i18n (>= 0.7, < 2)
minitest (~> 5.1)
tzinfo (~> 1.1)
- zeitwerk (~> 2.2)
+ zeitwerk (~> 2.2, >= 2.2.2)
addressable (2.7.0)
public_suffix (>= 2.0.2, < 5.0)
coffee-script (2.4.1)
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ GEM
colorator (1.1.0)
commonmarker (0.17.13)
ruby-enum (~> 0.5)
- concurrent-ruby (1.1.5)
+ concurrent-ruby (1.1.6)
dnsruby (1.61.3)
addressable (~> 2.5)
em-websocket (0.5.1)
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ GEM
jekyll (>= 3.5, < 5.0)
jekyll-feed (~> 0.9)
jekyll-seo-tag (~> 2.1)
- minitest (5.14.0)
+ minitest (5.14.1)
multipart-post (2.1.1)
nokogiri (1.10.9)
mini_portile2 (~> 2.4.0)
@@ -246,11 +246,11 @@ GEM
thread_safe (0.3.6)
typhoeus (1.3.1)
ethon (>= 0.9.0)
- tzinfo (1.2.6)
+ tzinfo (1.2.7)
thread_safe (~> 0.1)
unicode-display_width (1.6.1)
yell (2.2.2)
- zeitwerk (2.2.2)
+ zeitwerk (2.3.0)
PLATFORMS
ruby
From a3d2b00272adbba7befac295befdc2db3dd9428f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Umut=20I=C5=9F=C4=B1k?=
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 19:55:42 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 002/749] Translate starting-a-project.md via GitLocalize
---
_articles/tr/starting-a-project.md | 116 ++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/tr/starting-a-project.md b/_articles/tr/starting-a-project.md
index d6eb2e2deda..14442735d40 100644
--- a/_articles/tr/starting-a-project.md
+++ b/_articles/tr/starting-a-project.md
@@ -26,25 +26,19 @@ Bir proje açık kaynak olduğunda, **herhangi biri herhangi bir amaç için pro
Açık kaynak güçlüdür çünkü fikirlerin hızla yayılmasına izin vererek, benimseme engellerini azaltır. Ayrıca, kullanıcılara kapalı kaynağa göre kendi bilgisayarlarını ve bilgisayarlarında çalışan işlemleri kontrol etme imkanı da verir. Örneğin, açık kaynak yazılım kullanan bir işletme, yalnızca kapalı kaynak satıcısının ürün kararlarına güvenmek yerine, bir kişiyi yazılımda özel iyileştirmeler yapması için işe alma seçeneğine sahiptir.
-_Özgür yazılım_ , _açık kaynak ile_ aynı proje grubunu ifade eder. Bazen [bu terimleri](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_and_open-source_software) "ücretsiz ve açık kaynak yazılım" (FOSS) veya "ücretsiz, özgür ve açık kaynak yazılım" (FLOSS) olarak birleştirilir. _Free_ ve _Libre_ özgürlüğe atıfta bulunur [fiyata değil](#açık-kaynak-ücretsiz-anlamına-mı-geliyor).
+*Özgür yazılım* , *açık kaynak ile* aynı proje grubunu ifade eder. Bazen [bu terimleri](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_and_open-source_software) "ücretsiz ve açık kaynak yazılım" (FOSS) veya "ücretsiz, özgür ve açık kaynak yazılım" (FLOSS) olarak birleştirilir. *Free* ve *Libre* özgürlüğe atıfta bulunur [fiyata değil](#a%C3%A7%C4%B1k-kaynak-%C3%BCcretsiz-anlam%C4%B1na-m%C4%B1-geliyor).
### İnsanlar neden işlerini açık kaynak olarak sunarlar?
-
-
- Açık kaynak kullanmaktan ve işbirliği yapmaktan kazandığım en değerli deneyimlerden biri, aynı problemlerle karşı karşıya kalan diğer geliştiricilerle kurduğum ilişkilerden geliyor.
-
-— @kentcdodds, ["Açık Kaynağa Girmek Benim İçin Nasıl Harika Oldu"](https://kentcdodds.com/blog/how-getting-into-open-source-has-been-awesome-for-me)
-
-
+ Açık kaynak kullanmaktan ve işbirliği yapmaktan kazandığım en değerli deneyimlerden biri, aynı problemlerle karşı karşıya kalan diğer geliştiricilerle kurduğum ilişkilerden geliyor. — @kentcdodds, ["Açık Kaynağa Girmek Benim İçin Nasıl Harika Oldu"](https://kentcdodds.com/blog/how-getting-into-open-source-has-been-awesome-for-me)
Bir kişinin veya örgütün bir projeyi açmak istemesinin [birçok nedeni](https://ben.balter.com/2015/11/23/why-open-source/) vardır . Bazı örnekler:
-* **İşbirliği:** Açık kaynak projeler, dünyadaki herhangi birinden değişiklikleri kabul edebilir. Örneğin, [Exercism](https://github.com/exercism/) 350'den fazla katkıda bulunana sahip bir programlama egzersiz platformudur.
+- **İşbirliği:** Açık kaynak projeler, dünyadaki herhangi birinden değişiklikleri kabul edebilir. Örneğin, [Exercism](https://github.com/exercism/) 350'den fazla katkıda bulunana sahip bir programlama egzersiz platformudur.
-* **Adapte etme ve yeniden tanımlama:** Açık kaynaklı projeler herkes tarafından herhangi bir amaç için kullanılabilir. İnsanlar başka şeyler yapmak için bile kullanabilirler. Örneğin [WordPress](https://github.com/WordPress), [b2](https://github.com/WordPress/book/blob/master/Content/Part%201/2-b2-cafelog.md) adı verilen mevcut bir projenin alt dalı olarak başladı.
+- **Adapte etme ve yeniden tanımlama:** Açık kaynaklı projeler herkes tarafından herhangi bir amaç için kullanılabilir. İnsanlar başka şeyler yapmak için bile kullanabilirler. Örneğin [WordPress](https://github.com/WordPress), [b2](https://github.com/WordPress/book/blob/master/Content/Part%201/2-b2-cafelog.md) adı verilen mevcut bir projenin alt dalı olarak başladı.
-* **Şeffaflık:** Açık kaynaklı bir projeyi herkes hata veya tutarsızlık açısından inceleyebilir. Şeffaflık, [Bulgaristan](https://medium.com/@bozhobg/bulgaria-got-a-law-requiring-open-source-98bf626cf70a) veya [ABD](https://sourcecode.cio.gov/) gibi develetler, bankacılık veya sağlık gibi sıkı kurallara bağlı endüstriler ve [Let's Encrypt](https://github.com/letsencrypt) gibi güvenlik yazılımları için önemlidir.
+- **Şeffaflık:** Açık kaynaklı bir projeyi herkes hata veya tutarsızlık açısından inceleyebilir. Şeffaflık, [Bulgaristan](https://medium.com/@bozhobg/bulgaria-got-a-law-requiring-open-source-98bf626cf70a) veya [ABD](https://sourcecode.cio.gov/) gibi develetler, bankacılık veya sağlık gibi sıkı kurallara bağlı endüstriler ve [Let's Encrypt](https://github.com/letsencrypt) gibi güvenlik yazılımları için önemlidir.
Açık kaynak sadece yazılım için değil. Veri kümelerinden kitaplara kadar her şeyi açık kaynak koduyla açabilirsiniz. Açık kaynak başka neler yapabileceğiniz hakkında fikir edinmek için [GitHub Explore](https://github.com/explore)'a göz atın.
@@ -68,19 +62,13 @@ Henüz ikna olmadıysanız, hedeflerinizin ne olabileceğini düşünmek için b
### Hedeflerinizi belirlemek
-Hedefler, neyin üzerinde çalışacağınızı, neye hayır diyeceğinizi ve başkalarından nereden yardıma ihtiyacınız olduğunu anlamanıza yardımcı olabilir. Kendinize şunu sorarak başlayın, _neden bu projeye kaynak açıyorum?_
+Hedefler, neyin üzerinde çalışacağınızı, neye hayır diyeceğinizi ve başkalarından nereden yardıma ihtiyacınız olduğunu anlamanıza yardımcı olabilir. Kendinize şunu sorarak başlayın, *neden bu projeye kaynak açıyorum?*
Bu sorunun tek bir doğru cevabı yok. Tek bir proje veya farklı hedeflere sahip farklı projeler için birden fazla hedefiniz olabilir.
Tek amacınız işinizi göstermekse, katkı bile istemeyebilir ve hatta bunu README'nizde bile söyleyebilirsiniz. Öte yandan, katkıda bulunanlar istiyorsanız, açık belgelere ve yeni gelenlerin hoş karşılanmasına zaman ayıracaksınız.
-
-
- Bir noktada kullandığım özel bir UIAlertView yarattım ... ve açık kaynak yapmaya karar verdim. Bu yüzden daha dinamik olacak şekilde değiştirdim ve GitHub'a yükledim. Ayrıca diğer geliştiricilere projelerinde nasıl kullanacaklarını açıklayan ilk belgelerimi yazdım. Muhtemelen hiç kimse onu kullanmamıştı çünkü basit bir projeydi ama katkım konusunda kendimi iyi hissediyordum.
-
-— @mavris, ["Kendi Kendine Öğrenen Yazılım Geliştiricileri: Açık Kaynak Neden Bizim İçin Önemli?"](https://medium.com/rocknnull/self-taught-software-engineers-why-open-source-is-important-to-us-fe2a3473a576)
-
-
+ Bir noktada kullandığım özel bir UIAlertView yarattım ... ve açık kaynak yapmaya karar verdim. Bu yüzden daha dinamik olacak şekilde değiştirdim ve GitHub'a yükledim. Ayrıca diğer geliştiricilere projelerinde nasıl kullanacaklarını açıklayan ilk belgelerimi yazdım. Muhtemelen hiç kimse onu kullanmamıştı çünkü basit bir projeydi ama katkım konusunda kendimi iyi hissediyordum. — @mavris, ["Kendi Kendine Öğrenen Yazılım Geliştiricileri: Açık Kaynak Neden Bizim İçin Önemli?"](https://medium.com/rocknnull/self-taught-software-engineers-why-open-source-is-important-to-us-fe2a3473a576)
Projeniz büyüdükçe, topluluğunuzun sizden sadece kod yazmaktan daha fazlasına ihtiyacı olabilir. Sorunlara cevap vermek, kodu gözden geçirmek ve projenizi geliştirmek, açık kaynaklı bir projedeki önemli görevlerdir.
@@ -90,13 +78,7 @@ Kodlama yapmayan görevler için harcadığınız zaman, projenizin boyutuna ve
Tanıtım, operasyonlar ve projenin bakımı için özel bir bütçeye veya personele ihtiyacınız varsa, bu görüşmeleri erkenden başlatın.
-
-
- Projeyi açmaya başladığınızda, yönetim süreçlerinizin projenizdeki topluluğun katkılarını ve yeteneklerini göz önünde bulundurmasını sağlamak önemlidir. İşletmenizde istihdam edilmeyen katılımcıları, projenin kilit noktalarına dahil etmekten korkmayın - özellikle de sık sık katkıda bulunanlarsa.
-
-— @captainsafia, ["Öyleyse bir açık kaynak proje açmak istiyorsun, ha?"](Https://dev.to/captainsafia/so-you-wanna-open-source-a-project-eh-5779)
-
-
+ Projeyi açmaya başladığınızda, yönetim süreçlerinizin projenizdeki topluluğun katkılarını ve yeteneklerini göz önünde bulundurmasını sağlamak önemlidir. İşletmenizde istihdam edilmeyen katılımcıları, projenin kilit noktalarına dahil etmekten korkmayın - özellikle de sık sık katkıda bulunanlarsa. — @captainsafia, ["Öyleyse bir açık kaynak proje açmak istiyorsun, ha?"](Https://dev.to/captainsafia/so-you-wanna-open-source-a-project-eh-5779)
### Diğer projelere katkıda bulunmak
@@ -112,10 +94,10 @@ Genel olarak konuşursak, başkalarının işinizi görmesini ve işiniz hakkın
Projenizi hangi aşamada açmaya karar verirseniz verin, her proje aşağıdaki belgeleri içermelidir:
-* [Açık kaynak lisansı](https://help.github.com/articles/open-source-licensing/#where-does-the-license-live-on-my-repository)
-* [README](https://help.github.com/articles/create-a-repo/#commit-your-first-change)
-* [Katkıda bulunma kuralları](https://help.github.com/articles/setting-guidelines-for-repository-contributors/)
-* [Davranış kuralları](../code-of-conduct/)
+- [Açık kaynak lisansı](https://help.github.com/articles/open-source-licensing/#where-does-the-license-live-on-my-repository)
+- [README](https://help.github.com/articles/create-a-repo/#commit-your-first-change)
+- [Katkıda bulunma kuralları](https://help.github.com/articles/setting-guidelines-for-repository-contributors/)
+- [Davranış kuralları](../code-of-conduct/)
Bir geliştirici olarak, bu bileşenler beklentileri iletmenize, katkıları yönetmenize ve herkesin yasal haklarını (kendi haklarınız dahil) korumanıza yardımcı olur. Olumlu bir deneyim yaşama şansınızı önemli ölçüde artırırlar.
@@ -125,7 +107,7 @@ Projeniz GitHub'taysa, bu dosyaları önerilen dosya adlarıyla kök dizininize
Açık kaynaklı lisans, başkalarının projenize yanıt vermeden kullanabileceğini, kopyalayabileceğini, değiştirebileceğini ve katkıda bulunabileceğini garanti eder. Aynı zamanda sizi kötü yasal durumlardan korur. **Açık kaynak kodlu bir proje başlatırken projenize bir lisans eklemelisiniz.**
-Hukiki işler eğlenceli değildir. İyi haber şu ki, mevcut bir lisansı kopyalayıp havuzunuza yapıştırabilirsiniz. Zor işinizi korumak sadece bir dakikanızı alacaktır.
+Açık kaynaklı lisans, başkalarının projenize yanıt vermeden kullanabileceğini, kopyalayabileceğini, değiştirebileceğini ve katkıda bulunabileceğini garanti eder. Aynı zamanda sizi kötü yasal durumlardan korur. **Açık kaynak kodlu bir proje başlatırken projenize bir lisans eklemelisiniz.**
[MIT](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/), [Apache 2.0](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/) ve [GPLv3](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/gpl-3.0/) en popüler açık kaynaklı lisanslardır, ancak seçilebilecek [başka seçenekler](https://choosealicense.com) de vardır.
@@ -139,42 +121,36 @@ Açık kaynak kodlu bir projeyi yönetmenin yasal yönleri hakkında başka soru
README'ler projenizi nasıl kullanacağınızı açıklamaktan daha fazlasını yapar. Ayrıca, projenizin neden önemli olduğunu ve kullanıcılarınızın bununla neler yapabileceğini de açıklar.
-README'nizde aşağıdaki soruları cevaplamaya çalışın:
+In your README, try to answer the following questions:
-* Bu proje ne yapıyor?
-* Bu proje neden faydalıdır?
-* Kullanmaya nasıl başlarım?
-* İhtiyacım olursa nereden daha fazla yardım alabilirim?
+- Bu proje ne yapıyor?
+- Bu proje neden faydalıdır?
+- Kullanmaya nasıl başlarım?
+- İhtiyacım olursa nereden daha fazla yardım alabilirim?
README'nizi, katkıları nasıl ele aldığınız, projenin amaçlarının ne olduğu ve lisanslar ve atıflar hakkında bilgiler gibi diğer soruları yanıtlamak için kullanabilirsiniz. Katkı kabul etmek istemiyorsanız veya projeniz henüz olgun değilse, bunu mutlaka belirtin.
-
-
- Daha iyi belgeler, daha fazla kullanıcı, daha az destek talebi ve daha fazla katkıda bulunan anlamına gelir. (...) Unutma ki okuyucuların sen değilsin. Tamamen farklı deneyimlerle projeye gelebilecek insanlar var.
-
-- @tracymakes, ["Yazdıkların okunuyor (video)")(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LiV759Bje0&list=PLmV2D6sIiX3U03qc-FPXgLFGFkccCEtfv&index=10)
-
-
+ Daha iyi belgeler, daha fazla kullanıcı, daha az destek talebi ve daha fazla katkıda bulunan anlamına gelir. (...) Unutma ki okuyucuların sen değilsin. Tamamen farklı deneyimlerle projeye gelebilecek insanlar var. - @tracymakes, ["Yazdıkların okunuyor (video)")(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LiV759Bje0&list=PLmV2D6sIiX3U03qc-FPXgLFGFkccCEtfv&index=10)
Bazen, insanlar bir README yazmaktan kaçınırlar çünkü proje bitmemiş gibi hissederler veya katkı kabul etmek istemezler. Bunların hepsi yazmak için çok iyi nedenler.
Daha fazla ilham almak için, eksiksiz bir README yazmak için @dguo'nun ["Make a README" kılavuzunu](https://www.makeareadme.com/) veya @PurpleBooth'ın [README şablonunu](https://gist.github.com/PurpleBooth/109311bb0361f32d87a2) kullanmayı deneyin.
-Kök dizinine bir README dosyası eklediğinizde, GitHub otomatik olarak depo ana sayfasında görüntüler.
+Daha fazla ilham almak için, eksiksiz bir README yazmak için @dguo'nun ["Make a README" kılavuzunu](https://www.makeareadme.com/) veya @PurpleBooth'ın [README şablonunu](https://gist.github.com/PurpleBooth/109311bb0361f32d87a2) kullanmayı deneyin.
### Katkıda bulunma rehberinizi yazmak
-Bir CONTRIBUTING dosyası, izleyicilerinize projenize nasıl katkıda bulunabileceklerini söyler. Örneğin, şunlarla ilgili bilgiler de ekleyebilirsiniz:
+Kök dizinine bir README dosyası eklediğinizde, GitHub otomatik olarak depo ana sayfasında görüntüler.
-* Hata raporu nasıl gönderilir ([sorun ve istek şablonlarını](https://github.com/blog/2111-issue-and-pull-request-templates) kullanmayı deneyin)
-* Yeni bir özellik nasıl önerilir
-* Proje ortamı nasıl kurulur ve testler nasıl yapılır
+- Hata raporu nasıl gönderilir ([sorun ve istek şablonlarını](https://github.com/blog/2111-issue-and-pull-request-templates) kullanmayı deneyin)
+- Yeni bir özellik nasıl önerilir
+- Proje ortamı nasıl kurulur ve testler nasıl yapılır
Teknik ayrıntılara ek olarak, bir CONTRIBUTING dosyası, aşağıdakiler gibi katkılar için beklentilerinizi iletme fırsatıdır:
-* Aradığınız katkı türleri
-* Proje için yol haritanız veya vizyonunuz
-* Katkıda bulunanlar sizinle nasıl temasa geçmeli (veya geçmemeli)
+- Aradığınız katkı türleri
+- Proje için yol haritanız veya vizyonunuz
+- Katkıda bulunanlar sizinle nasıl temasa geçmeli (veya geçmemeli)
Sıcak, arkadaşça bir ton kullanmak ve katkılar için özel önerilerde bulunmak (örneğin, dokümantasyon yazmak veya bir web sitesi yapmak gibi) yeni gelenlerin kendilerini memnun ve istekli hissetmelerini sağlama konusunda yardımcı olabilir.
@@ -188,25 +164,19 @@ Zamanla, CONTRIBUTING dosyanıza sıkça sorulan diğer soruları ekleyebilirsin
CONTRIBUTING dosyanızı yazarken daha fazla yardım için @nayafia'nın [katkıda bulunma rehber şablonuna](https://github.com/nayafia/contributing-template/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING-template.md) veya @mozilla'nın ["Bir CONTRIBUTING.md Nasıl Oluşturulur"](https://mozillascience.github.io/working-open-workshop/contributing/) makalesine bakabilirsiniz.
-README'nizden CONTRIBUTING dosyanıza bağlantı verin, böylece daha çok insan görsün. [CONTRIBUTING dosyasını projenizin deposuna yerleştirirseniz](https://help.github.com/articles/setting-guidelines-for-repository-contributors/), bir katılımcı bir sorun oluşturduğunda veya bir PR açtığında GitHub otomatik olarak dosyanıza bağlanır.
+CONTRIBUTING dosyanızı yazarken daha fazla yardım için @nayafia'nın [katkıda bulunma rehber şablonuna](https://github.com/nayafia/contributing-template/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING-template.md) veya @mozilla'nın ["Bir CONTRIBUTING.md Nasıl Oluşturulur"](https://mozillascience.github.io/working-open-workshop/contributing/) makalesine bakabilirsiniz.
-![Contributing guidelines](/assets/images/starting-a-project/Contributing-guidelines.jpg)
+README'nizden CONTRIBUTING dosyanıza bağlantı verin, böylece daha çok insan görsün. [CONTRIBUTING dosyasını projenizin deposuna yerleştirirseniz](https://help.github.com/articles/setting-guidelines-for-repository-contributors/), bir katılımcı bir sorun oluşturduğunda veya bir PR açtığında GitHub otomatik olarak dosyanıza bağlanır.
### Davranış kural listesi oluşturmak
-
-
- Hepimiz, muhtemelen bir şeyin neden belli bir şekilde olması gerektiğini açıklamaya çalışan bir geliştirici olarak ya da bir kullanıcı olarak... basit bir soru sormakla ... ... kötüye kullanılan şeyin yaşadığı deneyimlerimiz oldu. (...) Davranış kuralları, ekibinizin yapıcı söylemleri çok ciddiye aldığını gösteren, kolayca referans verilen ve bağlanabilir bir belge haline gelir.
-
-- @mlynch, ["Açık Kaynağı Daha Mutlu Bir Yer Yapma"](https://medium.com/ionic-and-the-mobile-web/making-open-source-a-happier-place-3b90d254f5f)
-
-
+ Hepimiz, muhtemelen bir şeyin neden belli bir şekilde olması gerektiğini açıklamaya çalışan bir geliştirici olarak ya da bir kullanıcı olarak... basit bir soru sormakla ... ... kötüye kullanılan şeyin yaşadığı deneyimlerimiz oldu. (...) Davranış kuralları, ekibinizin yapıcı söylemleri çok ciddiye aldığını gösteren, kolayca referans verilen ve bağlanabilir bir belge haline gelir. - @mlynch, ["Açık Kaynağı Daha Mutlu Bir Yer Yapma"](https://medium.com/ionic-and-the-mobile-web/making-open-source-a-happier-place-3b90d254f5f)
Son olarak, bir davranış kural listesi projenizin katılımcı davranışları için temel kurallar koymanıza yardımcı olur. Bir topluluk veya şirket için açık kaynak kodlu bir proje başlatıyorsanız, bu özellikle değerlidir. Davranış kuralları, sağlıklı ve yapıcı topluluk davranışını kolaylaştırmanıza yardımcı olur ve bu da geliştirici olarak stresinizi azaltacaktır.
Daha fazla bilgi için [Davranış Kuralları kılavuzumuza](../code-of-conduct/) göz atın.
-Katılımcıların _nasıl_ davranmasını beklediğinizi iletmenin yanı sıra, bir davranış kural listesi de bu beklentilerin kimlere, ne zaman başvuruda bulunduklarına ve bir ihlal meydana geldiğinde ne yapılması gerektiğini açıklamaya meyillidir.
+Katılımcıların *nasıl* davranmasını beklediğinizi iletmenin yanı sıra, bir davranış kural listesi de bu beklentilerin kimlere, ne zaman başvuruda bulunduklarına ve bir ihlal meydana geldiğinde ne yapılması gerektiğini açıklamaya meyillidir.
Açık kaynaklı lisanslara benzer şekilde, davranış kuralları için de yeni ortaya çıkan standartlar vardır, bu yüzden kendiniz yazmak zorunda değilsiniz. [Contributor Covenant](https://contributor-covenant.org/), Kubernet, Rails ve Swift dahil olmak üzere [40.000'den fazla açık kaynaklı proje](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/adopters) tarafından kullanılan bir davranış kural listesi şablonudur. Hangi metni kullanırsanız kullanın, gerektiğinde davranış kurallarınızı uygulamak için hazırlıklı olmalısınız.
@@ -214,14 +184,14 @@ Metni doğrudan projenizdeki bir CODE_OF_CONDUCT dosyasına yapıştırın. Dosy
## Projenizi isimlendirme ve markalama
-Marka, gösterişli bir logo veya çekici bir proje adından daha fazlasıdır. Projeniz hakkında nasıl konuştuğunuzla ve mesajınızla kime ulaştığınızla ilgilidir.
+Metni doğrudan projenizdeki bir CODE_OF_CONDUCT dosyasına yapıştırın. Dosyayı projenizin kök dizininde tutun, böylece README'nizden kolayca bulabilir ve linkleyebilirsiniz.
### Doğru ismi seçmek
-Hatırlanması kolay olan ve ideal olarak projenin ne yaptığı hakkında bir fikir veren bir isim seçin. Örneğin:
+Marka, gösterişli bir logo veya çekici bir proje adından daha fazlasıdır. Projeniz hakkında nasıl konuştuğunuzla ve mesajınızla kime ulaştığınızla ilgilidir.
-* [Sentry](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry) çöküş raporlaması için uygulamaları izler
-* [Thin](https://github.com/macournoyer/thin) hızlı ve basit bir Ruby web sunucusudur
+- [Sentry](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry) çöküş raporlaması için uygulamaları izler
+- [Thin](https://github.com/macournoyer/thin) hızlı ve basit bir Ruby web sunucusudur
Mevcut bir projenin üzerine inşa ediyorsanız, adlarını ön ek olarak kullanmak projenizin ne yaptığını netleştirmeye yardımcı olabilir (örneğin, [node-fetch](https://github.com/bitinn/node-fetch) `window.fetch` komutunu getirir).
@@ -235,25 +205,19 @@ Bir web sitesi, Twitter hesabı veya projenizi temsil eden diğer özellikleri i
Projenizin adının herhangi bir ticari markayı ihlal etmediğinden emin olun. Bir şirket sizden projenizi kapatmanızı isteyebilir veya hatta aleyhinize yasal işlem başlatabilir. Bu riske değmez.
-[WIPO Global Marka Veritabanını](http://www.wipo.int/branddb/en/) ticari marka çakışmaları için kontrol edebilirsiniz. Eğer bir şirketteyseniz, bu [hukuk ekibinizin size yardımcı olabileceği](../legal/) şeylerden biridir.
+Projenizin adının herhangi bir ticari markayı ihlal etmediğinden emin olun. Bir şirket sizden projenizi kapatmanızı isteyebilir veya hatta aleyhinize yasal işlem başlatabilir. Bu riske değmez.
-Sonunda, proje adınız için hızlı bir Google araması yapın. İnsanlar projenizi kolayca bulabilecek mi? Arama sonuçlarında görmelerini istemediğiniz başka bir şey var mı?
+[WIPO Global Marka Veritabanını](http://www.wipo.int/branddb/en/) ticari marka çakışmaları için kontrol edebilirsiniz. Eğer bir şirketteyseniz, bu [hukuk ekibinizin size yardımcı olabileceği](../legal/) şeylerden biridir.
### Nasıl yazdığın (ve kodladığın) markanı da etkiler!
Projenizin ömrü boyunca birçok yazı yazacaksınız: README'ler, öğretici belgeler, topluluk belgeleri, sorulara cevaplar, belki de haber bültenleri ve posta listeleri.
-Resmi bir belge veya geçici bir e-posta olsun, yazma stiliniz projenizin markasının bir parçasıdır. Hedef kitlenize nasıl sesleneceğinizi ve bunun iletmek istediğiniz ton olup olmadığını düşünün.
+Projenizin ömrü boyunca birçok yazı yazacaksınız: README'ler, öğretici belgeler, topluluk belgeleri, sorulara cevaplar, belki de haber bültenleri ve posta listeleri.
-
-
- Posta listesindeki her konuya katılmaya ve örnek davranış göstermeye, insanlara iyi davranmaya, sorunlarını ciddiye almaya ve genel olarak yardımcı olmaya çalıştım. Bir süre sonra, insanlar sadece soru sormakla kalmayıp aynı zamanda yanıtlamada da yardımcı olmak için tarzımı taklit ettiler.
-
-- [CouchDB](https://github.com/apache/couchdb)'deki @janl, ["Sürdürülebilir Açık Kaynak"](https://writing.jan.io/2015/11/20/sustainable-open-source.html)
-
-
+ Posta listesindeki her konuya katılmaya ve örnek davranış göstermeye, insanlara iyi davranmaya, sorunlarını ciddiye almaya ve genel olarak yardımcı olmaya çalıştım. Bir süre sonra, insanlar sadece soru sormakla kalmayıp aynı zamanda yanıtlamada da yardımcı olmak için tarzımı taklit ettiler. - [CouchDB](https://github.com/apache/couchdb)'deki @janl, ["Sürdürülebilir Açık Kaynak"](https://writing.jan.io/2015/11/20/sustainable-open-source.html)
-Sıcak, kapsayıcı bir dil kullanmak ("onlar" gibi, tek bir kişiye atıfta bulunsanız bile), projenizin yeni katılımcılar için memnuniyetle karşılanmasında yardımcı olabilir. Okuyucularınızın çoğu anadili İngilizce olmayabilir.
+Resmi bir belge veya geçici bir e-posta olsun, yazma stiliniz projenizin markasının bir parçasıdır. Hedef kitlenize nasıl sesleneceğinizi ve bunun iletmek istediğiniz ton olup olmadığını düşünün.
Kelimeleri nasıl yazdığınızın ötesinde, kodlama stiliniz de projenizin markasının bir parçası olabilir. [Angular](https://angular.io/guide/styleguide) ve [jQuery](https://contribute.jquery.org/style-guide/js/) titiz kodlama stilleri ve yönergeleri olan projelere iki örnektir.
From 697da015ded8bbea360becc788a70eca8242494e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "gitlocalize-app[bot]"
<55277160+gitlocalize-app[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 19:55:44 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 003/749] Translate starting-a-project.md via GitLocalize
---
_articles/tr/starting-a-project.md | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/tr/starting-a-project.md b/_articles/tr/starting-a-project.md
index 14442735d40..88db439963a 100644
--- a/_articles/tr/starting-a-project.md
+++ b/_articles/tr/starting-a-project.md
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Açık kaynak güçlüdür çünkü fikirlerin hızla yayılmasına izin vererek
### İnsanlar neden işlerini açık kaynak olarak sunarlar?
- Açık kaynak kullanmaktan ve işbirliği yapmaktan kazandığım en değerli deneyimlerden biri, aynı problemlerle karşı karşıya kalan diğer geliştiricilerle kurduğum ilişkilerden geliyor. — @kentcdodds, ["Açık Kaynağa Girmek Benim İçin Nasıl Harika Oldu"](https://kentcdodds.com/blog/how-getting-into-open-source-has-been-awesome-for-me)
+ Açık kaynak kullanmaktan ve işbirliği yapmaktan kazandığım en değerli deneyimlerden biri, aynı problemlerle karşı karşıya kalan diğer geliştiricilerle kurduğum ilişkilerden geliyor. - @kentcdodds, ["Açık Kaynağa Girmek Benim İçin Nasıl Harika Oldu"](https://kentcdodds.com/blog/how-getting-into-open-source-has-been-awesome-for-me)
Bir kişinin veya örgütün bir projeyi açmak istemesinin [birçok nedeni](https://ben.balter.com/2015/11/23/why-open-source/) vardır . Bazı örnekler:
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Bu sorunun tek bir doğru cevabı yok. Tek bir proje veya farklı hedeflere sahi
Tek amacınız işinizi göstermekse, katkı bile istemeyebilir ve hatta bunu README'nizde bile söyleyebilirsiniz. Öte yandan, katkıda bulunanlar istiyorsanız, açık belgelere ve yeni gelenlerin hoş karşılanmasına zaman ayıracaksınız.
- Bir noktada kullandığım özel bir UIAlertView yarattım ... ve açık kaynak yapmaya karar verdim. Bu yüzden daha dinamik olacak şekilde değiştirdim ve GitHub'a yükledim. Ayrıca diğer geliştiricilere projelerinde nasıl kullanacaklarını açıklayan ilk belgelerimi yazdım. Muhtemelen hiç kimse onu kullanmamıştı çünkü basit bir projeydi ama katkım konusunda kendimi iyi hissediyordum. — @mavris, ["Kendi Kendine Öğrenen Yazılım Geliştiricileri: Açık Kaynak Neden Bizim İçin Önemli?"](https://medium.com/rocknnull/self-taught-software-engineers-why-open-source-is-important-to-us-fe2a3473a576)
+ Bir noktada kullandığım özel bir UIAlertView yarattım ... ve açık kaynak yapmaya karar verdim. Bu yüzden daha dinamik olacak şekilde değiştirdim ve GitHub'a yükledim. Ayrıca diğer geliştiricilere projelerinde nasıl kullanacaklarını açıklayan ilk belgelerimi yazdım. Muhtemelen hiç kimse onu kullanmamıştı çünkü basit bir projeydi ama katkım konusunda kendimi iyi hissediyordum. - @mavris, ["Kendi Kendine Öğrenen Yazılım Geliştiricileri: Açık Kaynak Neden Bizim İçin Önemli?"](https://medium.com/rocknnull/self-taught-software-engineers-why-open-source-is-important-to-us-fe2a3473a576)
Projeniz büyüdükçe, topluluğunuzun sizden sadece kod yazmaktan daha fazlasına ihtiyacı olabilir. Sorunlara cevap vermek, kodu gözden geçirmek ve projenizi geliştirmek, açık kaynaklı bir projedeki önemli görevlerdir.
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ Açık kaynak kodlu bir projeyi yönetmenin yasal yönleri hakkında başka soru
README'ler projenizi nasıl kullanacağınızı açıklamaktan daha fazlasını yapar. Ayrıca, projenizin neden önemli olduğunu ve kullanıcılarınızın bununla neler yapabileceğini de açıklar.
-In your README, try to answer the following questions:
+README'ler projenizi nasıl kullanacağınızı açıklamaktan daha fazlasını yapar. Ayrıca, projenizin neden önemli olduğunu ve kullanıcılarınızın bununla neler yapabileceğini de açıklar.
- Bu proje ne yapıyor?
- Bu proje neden faydalıdır?
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ In your README, try to answer the following questions:
README'nizi, katkıları nasıl ele aldığınız, projenin amaçlarının ne olduğu ve lisanslar ve atıflar hakkında bilgiler gibi diğer soruları yanıtlamak için kullanabilirsiniz. Katkı kabul etmek istemiyorsanız veya projeniz henüz olgun değilse, bunu mutlaka belirtin.
- Daha iyi belgeler, daha fazla kullanıcı, daha az destek talebi ve daha fazla katkıda bulunan anlamına gelir. (...) Unutma ki okuyucuların sen değilsin. Tamamen farklı deneyimlerle projeye gelebilecek insanlar var. - @tracymakes, ["Yazdıkların okunuyor (video)")(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LiV759Bje0&list=PLmV2D6sIiX3U03qc-FPXgLFGFkccCEtfv&index=10)
+ Daha iyi belgeler, daha fazla kullanıcı, daha az destek talebi ve daha fazla katkıda bulunan anlamına gelir. (...) Unutma ki okuyucuların sen değilsin. Tamamen farklı deneyimlerle projeye gelebilecek insanlar var. - @tracymakes, ["Yazdıkların okunuyor (video)")(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LiV759Bje0&list=PLmV2D6sIiX3U03qc-FPXgLFGFkccCEtfv&index=10)
Bazen, insanlar bir README yazmaktan kaçınırlar çünkü proje bitmemiş gibi hissederler veya katkı kabul etmek istemezler. Bunların hepsi yazmak için çok iyi nedenler.
From d42188cc7a191ce8140f2e751cf0014098d70ad8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bruno=20Fran=C3=A7a?=
<39228171+bsfranca2@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 18:46:35 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 004/749] accent correction in Portuguese
---
_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md b/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
index 9be6ae9d9c7..b5684dc7902 100644
--- a/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
+++ b/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Para entender como funciona, imagine que seu amigo está dando uma festa, e voc
* Um amigo, Alex, que é um chefe de pastelaria, sugere reduzir o açúcar (_modifica_)
* Outra amiga, Lisa, pede para utilizá-la em um jantar na próxima semana (_distribui_)
-Em comparação, um processo de código fechado seria ir a um restaurante e pedir um pedaço de torta. Você tem que pagar uma taxa para comer a torta, e o restaurante provavelmente não te dará a receita. Se vocẽ copiasse a torta deles exatamente e a vendesse sob seu próprio nome, o restaurante poderia abrir uma ação contra você.
+Em comparação, um processo de código fechado seria ir a um restaurante e pedir um pedaço de torta. Você tem que pagar uma taxa para comer a torta, e o restaurante provavelmente não te dará a receita. Se você copiasse a torta deles exatamente e a vendesse sob seu próprio nome, o restaurante poderia abrir uma ação contra você.
### Por que as pessoas tornam seu trabalho open source?
From ec602c948eea39c4c4b3a7adb5bef2d863eacd77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bruno=20Fran=C3=A7a?=
<39228171+bsfranca2@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 19:02:39 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 005/749] accent correction in Portuguese
---
_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md b/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
index b5684dc7902..ed7dc2035da 100644
--- a/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
+++ b/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ A medida que o seu projeto cresce, sua comunidade pode precisar de mais do que a
Enquanto a quantidade de tempo que você gasta em tarefas que não envolvem código depende do tamanho e escopo do seu projeto, você deve estar preparado, como um mantenedor, a cuidar delas você mesmo ou a encontrar alguém para ajudá-lo.
-**Se você faz parte de uma empresa tornando um projeto open source,** certifique-se de que seu projeto tem os recursos internos que ele precisa para florescer. Vocẽ irá querer identificar quem é responsável por manter o projeto após o almoço e compartilhar essas tarefas com a comunidade.
+**Se você faz parte de uma empresa tornando um projeto open source,** certifique-se de que seu projeto tem os recursos internos que ele precisa para florescer. Você irá querer identificar quem é responsável por manter o projeto após o almoço e compartilhar essas tarefas com a comunidade.
Se você precisar de uma renda dedicada ou pessoal para promoção, operações e manutenção do projeto, comece essas discussões cedo.
From 4c973ba7203fb79ad4213fce2245faefcda88e2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bruno=20Fran=C3=A7a?=
<39228171+bsfranca2@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 19:06:14 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 006/749] accent correction in Portuguese
---
_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md b/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
index ed7dc2035da..b13c6f64ce4 100644
--- a/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
+++ b/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ Crie um link para seu arquivo CONTRIBUTING a partir do seu README, de modo que m
-Finalmente, um código de conduta ajuda a criar regras básicas de comportamento para os participantes do seu projeto. Isso possui um valor especial se vocẽ está lançando um projeto open source para a comunidade ou alguma empresa. Um código de conduta te dá o poder de facilitar um comportamento saudável e construtivo da comunidade, o que irá reduzir seu estresse como mantenedor.
+Finalmente, um código de conduta ajuda a criar regras básicas de comportamento para os participantes do seu projeto. Isso possui um valor especial se você está lançando um projeto open source para a comunidade ou alguma empresa. Um código de conduta te dá o poder de facilitar um comportamento saudável e construtivo da comunidade, o que irá reduzir seu estresse como mantenedor.
Para mais informações, dê uma olhada no nosso [guia do Código de Conduta](../code-of-conduct/).
From 884ddddf43a48196159a4396319369324aaeaff0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bruno=20Fran=C3=A7a?=
<39228171+bsfranca2@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 19:28:28 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 007/749] accent correction in Portuguese
---
_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md b/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
index b13c6f64ce4..56fe51e3925 100644
--- a/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
+++ b/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ Se você precisar de uma renda dedicada ou pessoal para promoção, operações
- Quando você começa a tornar o projeto open source, é importante se certificar de que os seus processos ãdministrativos levam em consideração as contribuições e habilidades da comunidade em torno do seu projeto. Não tenha medo de envolver contribuidores que não são empregados da sua empresa em aspectos chave do projeto - especialmente se eles sao contribuidores assíduos.
+ Quando você começa a tornar o projeto open source, é importante se certificar de que os seus processos administrativos levam em consideração as contribuições e habilidades da comunidade em torno do seu projeto. Não tenha medo de envolver contribuidores que não são empregados da sua empresa em aspectos chave do projeto - especialmente se eles sao contribuidores assíduos.
— @captainsafia, ["So you wanna open source a project, eh?"](https://dev.to/captainsafia/so-you-wanna-open-source-a-project-eh-5779)
From 7dd182049f0cbc7782f6118ac7bc86b94876e67c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bruno=20Fran=C3=A7a?=
<39228171+bsfranca2@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 19:34:56 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 008/749] accent correction in Portuguese
---
_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md b/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
index 56fe51e3925..54691d69ff4 100644
--- a/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
+++ b/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ Se você precisar de uma renda dedicada ou pessoal para promoção, operações
- Quando você começa a tornar o projeto open source, é importante se certificar de que os seus processos administrativos levam em consideração as contribuições e habilidades da comunidade em torno do seu projeto. Não tenha medo de envolver contribuidores que não são empregados da sua empresa em aspectos chave do projeto - especialmente se eles sao contribuidores assíduos.
+ Quando você começa a tornar o projeto open source, é importante se certificar de que os seus processos administrativos levam em consideração as contribuições e habilidades da comunidade em torno do seu projeto. Não tenha medo de envolver contribuidores que não são empregados da sua empresa em aspectos chave do projeto - especialmente se eles são contribuidores assíduos.
— @captainsafia, ["So you wanna open source a project, eh?"](https://dev.to/captainsafia/so-you-wanna-open-source-a-project-eh-5779)
From f3b6d75b9d2f6d619eb11c3062f2a71e1cbf8534 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bruno=20Fran=C3=A7a?=
<39228171+bsfranca2@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 19:37:53 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 009/749] Writing error
---
_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md b/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
index 54691d69ff4..fbf21edb4a2 100644
--- a/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
+++ b/_articles/pt/starting-a-project.md
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ Independente do estágio em que você decida tornar o seu projeto open source, t
* [Contributing guidelines](https://help.github.com/articles/setting-guidelines-for-repository-contributors/)
* [Code of conduct](../code-of-conduct/)
-Como um mantenedor, esses componentes irão ajudá-lo a comunicar suas espectativas, administrar contribuições, e projeger o direito legal de todos (inclusive o seu). Eles aumentam suas chances de ter uma experência positiva significativamente.
+Como um mantenedor, esses componentes irão ajudá-lo a comunicar suas espectativas, administrar contribuições, e proteger o direito legal de todos (inclusive o seu). Eles aumentam suas chances de ter uma experência positiva significativamente.
Se seu projeto está no GitHub, colocar esses arquivos no seu diretório root com os nomes recomendados ajudará o GitHub a reconhecê-los e automaticamente mostrá-los da maneira apropriada aos seus leitores.
From 0d9f52dd89a320e04d9ccf9cbb9c25f87d4e53e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "dependabot-preview[bot]"
<27856297+dependabot-preview[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 23:01:05 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 010/749] Bump github-pages from 204 to 206
Bumps [github-pages](https://github.com/github/pages-gem) from 204 to 206.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/github/pages-gem/releases)
- [Commits](https://github.com/github/pages-gem/compare/v204...v206)
Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot]
---
Gemfile.lock | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Gemfile.lock b/Gemfile.lock
index a81214f5996..3f08f091811 100644
--- a/Gemfile.lock
+++ b/Gemfile.lock
@@ -26,14 +26,14 @@ GEM
ffi (>= 1.3.0)
eventmachine (1.2.7)
execjs (2.7.0)
- faraday (1.0.0)
+ faraday (1.0.1)
multipart-post (>= 1.2, < 3)
ffi (1.12.2)
forwardable-extended (2.6.0)
gemoji (3.0.1)
- github-pages (204)
+ github-pages (206)
github-pages-health-check (= 1.16.1)
- jekyll (= 3.8.5)
+ jekyll (= 3.8.7)
jekyll-avatar (= 0.7.0)
jekyll-coffeescript (= 1.1.1)
jekyll-commonmark-ghpages (= 0.1.6)
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ GEM
mercenary (~> 0.3)
minima (= 2.5.1)
nokogiri (>= 1.10.4, < 2.0)
- rouge (= 3.13.0)
+ rouge (= 3.19.0)
terminal-table (~> 1.4)
github-pages-health-check (1.16.1)
addressable (~> 2.3)
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ GEM
http_parser.rb (0.6.0)
i18n (0.9.5)
concurrent-ruby (~> 1.0)
- jekyll (3.8.5)
+ jekyll (3.8.7)
addressable (~> 2.4)
colorator (~> 1.0)
em-websocket (~> 0.5)
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ GEM
mini_portile2 (~> 2.4.0)
nokogumbo (2.0.2)
nokogiri (~> 1.8, >= 1.8.4)
- octokit (4.15.0)
+ octokit (4.18.0)
faraday (>= 0.9)
sawyer (~> 0.8.0, >= 0.5.3)
parallel (1.19.1)
@@ -225,13 +225,13 @@ GEM
public_suffix (3.1.1)
rainbow (3.0.0)
rake (13.0.1)
- rb-fsevent (0.10.3)
+ rb-fsevent (0.10.4)
rb-inotify (0.10.1)
ffi (~> 1.0)
- rouge (3.13.0)
- ruby-enum (0.7.2)
+ rouge (3.19.0)
+ ruby-enum (0.8.0)
i18n
- rubyzip (2.0.0)
+ rubyzip (2.3.0)
safe_yaml (1.0.5)
sass (3.7.4)
sass-listen (~> 4.0.0)
@@ -244,11 +244,11 @@ GEM
terminal-table (1.8.0)
unicode-display_width (~> 1.1, >= 1.1.1)
thread_safe (0.3.6)
- typhoeus (1.3.1)
+ typhoeus (1.4.0)
ethon (>= 0.9.0)
tzinfo (1.2.7)
thread_safe (~> 0.1)
- unicode-display_width (1.6.1)
+ unicode-display_width (1.7.0)
yell (2.2.2)
zeitwerk (2.3.0)
From 507389d2618a38c523a063b7e1d2f9ba34b2373c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Abilio Esteves
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 22:21:21 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 011/749] reviews list of first-timers resources
---
_articles/de/how-to-contribute.md | 4 ++--
_articles/es/how-to-contribute.md | 2 ++
_articles/fr/how-to-contribute.md | 2 ++
_articles/hu/how-to-contribute.md | 1 +
_articles/id/how-to-contribute.md | 2 ++
_articles/ja/how-to-contribute.md | 7 ++++---
_articles/ko/how-to-contribute.md | 2 ++
_articles/pt/how-to-contribute.md | 7 ++++---
_articles/ta/how-to-contribute.md | 2 ++
_articles/zh-hans/how-to-contribute.md | 2 ++
_articles/zh-hant/how-to-contribute.md | 2 ++
11 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/de/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/de/how-to-contribute.md
index f23942c6138..b94b7043554 100644
--- a/_articles/de/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/_articles/de/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -239,10 +239,10 @@ Weiterhin, können Sie auf folgenden Seiten neue Projekte zum Beitragen entdecke
* [GitHub Explore](https://github.com/explore/)
* [Open Source Friday](https://opensourcefriday.com)
-* [First Timers Only](http://www.firsttimersonly.com/)
+* [First Timers Only](https://www.firsttimersonly.com/)
* [CodeTriage](https://www.codetriage.com/)
* [24 Pull Requests](https://24pullrequests.com/)
-* [Up For Grabs](http://up-for-grabs.net/)
+* [Up For Grabs](https://up-for-grabs.net/)
* [Contributor-ninja](https://contributor.ninja)
* [First Contributions](https://firstcontributions.github.io)
* [SourceSort](https://www.sourcesort.com/)
diff --git a/_articles/es/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/es/how-to-contribute.md
index 6f81d3ad0d6..bc8f64bb38c 100644
--- a/_articles/es/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/_articles/es/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -216,6 +216,8 @@ Puedes también utilizar algunos de los siguientes recursos para ayudarte
* [24 Pull Requests](https://24pullrequests.com/)
* [Up For Grabs](https://up-for-grabs.net/)
* [Contributor-ninja](https://contributor.ninja)
+* [First Contributions](https://firstcontributions.github.io)
+* [SourceSort](https://www.sourcesort.com/)
### Una lista de verificación antes de que contribuyas
diff --git a/_articles/fr/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/fr/how-to-contribute.md
index 7b678dd5fe9..7ec90a96ee5 100644
--- a/_articles/fr/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/_articles/fr/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -216,6 +216,8 @@ Vous pouvez également utiliser l'une des ressources suivantes pour vous aider
* [24 Pull Requests](https://24pullrequests.com/)
* [Up For Grabs](https://up-for-grabs.net/)
* [Contributor-ninja](https://contributor.ninja)
+* [First Contributions](https://firstcontributions.github.io)
+* [SourceSort](https://www.sourcesort.com/)
### Une checklist avant de contribuer
diff --git a/_articles/hu/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/hu/how-to-contribute.md
index 6d2498cf74b..8c882058d7f 100644
--- a/_articles/hu/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/_articles/hu/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ Az alábbiakban találsz néhány oldalt, amelyek segítenek abban, hogy felfede
* [Up For Grabs](https://up-for-grabs.net/)
* [Contributor-ninja](https://contributor.ninja)
* [First Contributions](https://firstcontributions.github.io)
+* [SourceSort](https://www.sourcesort.com/)
### Egy ellenőrző lista, mielőtt részt vennél a projektben
diff --git a/_articles/id/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/id/how-to-contribute.md
index 47a52cd4e0d..186ad3100f6 100644
--- a/_articles/id/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/_articles/id/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -216,6 +216,8 @@ Anda juga bisa menggunakan salah satu dari beberapa sumber daya berikut untuk me
* [24 Pull Requests](https://24pullrequests.com/)
* [Up For Grabs](https://up-for-grabs.net/)
* [Contributor-ninja](https://contributor.ninja)
+* [First Contributions](https://firstcontributions.github.io)
+* [SourceSort](https://www.sourcesort.com/)
### Daftar sebelum Anda berkontribusi
diff --git a/_articles/ja/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/ja/how-to-contribute.md
index 2bf8d0338cb..43923ef4afc 100644
--- a/_articles/ja/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/_articles/ja/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -211,12 +211,13 @@ README を読んで、壊れたリンクやタイポを見つけるかもしれ
* [GitHub Explore](https://github.com/explore/)
* [Open Source Friday](https://opensourcefriday.com)
-* [First Timers Only](http://www.firsttimersonly.com/)
-* [Your First PR](https://yourfirstpr.github.io/)
+* [First Timers Only](https://www.firsttimersonly.com/)
* [CodeTriage](https://www.codetriage.com/)
* [24 Pull Requests](https://24pullrequests.com/)
-* [Up For Grabs](http://up-for-grabs.net/)
+* [Up For Grabs](https://up-for-grabs.net/)
* [Contributor-ninja](https://contributor.ninja)
+* [First Contributions](https://firstcontributions.github.io)
+* [SourceSort](https://www.sourcesort.com/)
### コントリビュートする前のチェックリスト
diff --git a/_articles/ko/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/ko/how-to-contribute.md
index f62d90a42ba..8ba1371726b 100644
--- a/_articles/ko/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/_articles/ko/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -216,6 +216,8 @@ README를 스캔하여 깨진 링크나 오타를 찾을 수 있습니다. 또
* [24 Pull Requests](https://24pullrequests.com/)
* [Up For Grabs](https://up-for-grabs.net/)
* [Contributor-ninja](https://contributor.ninja)
+* [First Contributions](https://firstcontributions.github.io)
+* [SourceSort](https://www.sourcesort.com/)
### 기여하기 전 확인할 사항
diff --git a/_articles/pt/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/pt/how-to-contribute.md
index e3b29975e24..36579e4c3d7 100644
--- a/_articles/pt/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/_articles/pt/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -211,12 +211,13 @@ Você também pode usar um dos seguintes recursos para ajudá-lo a descobrir e c
* [GitHub Explore](https://github.com/explore/)
* [Open Source Friday](https://opensourcefriday.com)
-* [First Timers Only](http://www.firsttimersonly.com/)
-* [Your First PR](https://yourfirstpr.github.io/)
+* [First Timers Only](https://www.firsttimersonly.com/)
* [CodeTriage](https://www.codetriage.com/)
* [24 Pull Requests](https://24pullrequests.com/)
-* [Up For Grabs](http://up-for-grabs.net/)
+* [Up For Grabs](https://up-for-grabs.net/)
* [Contributor-ninja](https://contributor.ninja)
+* [First Contributions](https://firstcontributions.github.io)
+* [SourceSort](https://www.sourcesort.com/)
### Um checklist antes de você contribuir
diff --git a/_articles/ta/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/ta/how-to-contribute.md
index 4e49aeb57c5..c27a34f7070 100644
--- a/_articles/ta/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/_articles/ta/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -216,6 +216,8 @@ related:
* [24 இழு கோரிக்கைகள்](https://24pullrequests.com/)
* [Up For Grabs](https://up-for-grabs.net/)
* [பங்களிப்பாளர்-நிஞ்ஜா](https://contributor.ninja)
+* [முதல் பங்களிப்புகள்](https://firstcontributions.github.io)
+* [SourceSort](https://www.sourcesort.com/)
### பங்களிக்கும் முன் ஒரு சரிபார்ப்புப் பட்டியல்
diff --git a/_articles/zh-hans/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/zh-hans/how-to-contribute.md
index 7c1bc126b1f..e985ca3882f 100644
--- a/_articles/zh-hans/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/_articles/zh-hans/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -217,6 +217,8 @@ redirect_from: /zh-cn/how-to-contribute/
* [24 Pull Requests](https://24pullrequests.com/)
* [Up For Grabs](https://up-for-grabs.net/)
* [像忍者一样贡献](https://contributor.ninja)
+* [最初的贡献](https://firstcontributions.github.io)
+* [SourceSort](https://www.sourcesort.com/)
### 提交贡献之前的检查列表
diff --git a/_articles/zh-hant/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/zh-hant/how-to-contribute.md
index e2328f70e80..32d16ac5969 100644
--- a/_articles/zh-hant/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/_articles/zh-hant/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -217,6 +217,8 @@ redirect_from: /zh-tw/how-to-contribute/
* [24 Pull Requests](https://24pullrequests.com/)
* [Up For Grabs](http://up-for-grabs.net/)
* [貢獻忍者](https://contributor.ninja)
+* [最初的贡献](https://firstcontributions.github.io)
+* [SourceSort](https://www.sourcesort.com/)
### **提交貢獻前應做的檢查清單**
From 30ddd43415eb1ca82ab4fc66c7a1a26c39e5388d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: SADIK KUZU
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:40:49 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 012/749] Applying translations into header (class=h00-mktg)
---
_layouts/index.html | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/_layouts/index.html b/_layouts/index.html
index bbc73bfabd7..2f74e50281f 100644
--- a/_layouts/index.html
+++ b/_layouts/index.html
@@ -2,13 +2,18 @@
layout: default
---
{% assign t = site.data.locales[page.lang][page.lang] %}
+{% if page.title %}
+ {% assign header = page.title %}
+{% else %}
+ {% assign header = site.title %}
+{% endif %}
{% include nav.html %}
-** Projek dialu-alukan **
+**Projek dialu-alukan**
Projek yang mesra dan mesra memberi isyarat bahawa mereka akan menerima penyumbang baru.
@@ -403,43 +403,43 @@ Sama ada anda penyumbang sekali atau cuba menyertai komuniti, bekerja dengan ora
Sebelum anda membuka masalah atau menarik permintaan, atau mengajukan soalan dalam sembang, ingatlah perkara ini untuk membantu idea anda disampaikan dengan berkesan.
-** Beri konteks. ** Bantu orang lain dengan pantas. Sekiranya anda mengalami ralat, jelaskan apa yang anda cuba lakukan dan bagaimana menghasilkannya. Sekiranya anda mencadangkan idea baru, jelaskan mengapa anda berpendapat bahawa ia berguna untuk projek ini (bukan hanya untuk anda!).
+**Beri konteks.** Bantu orang lain dengan pantas. Sekiranya anda mengalami ralat, jelaskan apa yang anda cuba lakukan dan bagaimana menghasilkannya. Sekiranya anda mencadangkan idea baru, jelaskan mengapa anda berpendapat bahawa ia berguna untuk projek ini (bukan hanya untuk anda!).
-> 😇 _ "X tidak berlaku semasa saya melakukan Y" _
+> 😇 _"X tidak berlaku semasa saya melakukan Y"_
>
-> 😢 _ "X rosak! Sila perbaiki." _
+> 😢 _"X rosak! Sila perbaiki."_
-** Lakukan kerja rumah anda terlebih dahulu. ** Tidak perlu mengetahui apa-apa, tetapi tunjukkan bahawa anda telah mencuba. Sebelum meminta bantuan, pastikan untuk memeriksa README, dokumentasi, masalah (terbuka atau tertutup), senarai mel, dan cari di internet untuk mendapatkan jawapan. Orang akan menghargai apabila anda menunjukkan bahawa anda cuba belajar.
+**Lakukan kerja rumah anda terlebih dahulu.** Tidak perlu mengetahui apa-apa, tetapi tunjukkan bahawa anda telah mencuba. Sebelum meminta bantuan, pastikan untuk memeriksa README, dokumentasi, masalah (terbuka atau tertutup), senarai mel, dan cari di internet untuk mendapatkan jawapan. Orang akan menghargai apabila anda menunjukkan bahawa anda cuba belajar.
-> 😇 _ "Saya tidak pasti bagaimana melaksanakan X. Saya memeriksa dokumen bantuan dan tidak menemui sebutan." _
+> 😇 _"Saya tidak pasti bagaimana melaksanakan X. Saya memeriksa dokumen bantuan dan tidak menemui sebutan."_
>
-> 😢 _ "Bagaimana saya X?" _
+> 😢 _"Bagaimana saya X?"_
-** Jauhkan permintaan pendek dan langsung. ** Sama seperti menghantar e-mel, setiap sumbangan, tidak kira seberapa sederhana atau bermanfaat, memerlukan ulasan orang lain. Banyak projek mempunyai lebih banyak permintaan masuk daripada orang yang ada untuk membantu. Bersikap ringkas. Anda akan meningkatkan peluang seseorang dapat menolong anda.
+**Jauhkan permintaan pendek dan langsung.** Sama seperti menghantar e-mel, setiap sumbangan, tidak kira seberapa sederhana atau bermanfaat, memerlukan ulasan orang lain. Banyak projek mempunyai lebih banyak permintaan masuk daripada orang yang ada untuk membantu. Bersikap ringkas. Anda akan meningkatkan peluang seseorang dapat menolong anda.
-> 😇 _ "Saya ingin menulis tutorial API." _
+> 😇 _"Saya ingin menulis tutorial API."_
>
-> 😢 _ "Saya memandu di jalan raya pada suatu hari dan berhenti untuk mencari minyak, dan kemudian saya mempunyai idea yang luar biasa ini untuk sesuatu yang seharusnya kita lakukan, tetapi sebelum saya menerangkannya, izinkan saya menunjukkan kepada anda ..." _
+> 😢 _"Saya memandu di jalan raya pada suatu hari dan berhenti untuk mencari minyak, dan kemudian saya mempunyai idea yang luar biasa ini untuk sesuatu yang seharusnya kita lakukan, tetapi sebelum saya menerangkannya, izinkan saya menunjukkan kepada anda ..."_
-** Jauhkan semua komunikasi untuk umum. ** Walaupun menggoda, jangan menghubungi penyelenggara secara tertutup kecuali anda perlu berkongsi maklumat sensitif (seperti masalah keselamatan atau pelanggaran tingkah laku serius). Apabila perbualan anda tetap terbuka, lebih ramai orang dapat belajar dan mendapat faedah daripada pertukaran anda. Perbincangan boleh menjadi sumbangan mereka sendiri.
+**Jauhkan semua komunikasi untuk umum.** Walaupun menggoda, jangan menghubungi penyelenggara secara tertutup kecuali anda perlu berkongsi maklumat sensitif (seperti masalah keselamatan atau pelanggaran tingkah laku serius). Apabila perbualan anda tetap terbuka, lebih ramai orang dapat belajar dan mendapat faedah daripada pertukaran anda. Perbincangan boleh menjadi sumbangan mereka sendiri.
->😇 _ (sebagai komen) "@ -maintainer Hai! Bagaimana kita harus meneruskan PR ini?" _
+>😇 _(sebagai komen) "@ -maintainer Hai! Bagaimana kita harus meneruskan PR ini?"_
>
-> 😢 _ (sebagai e-mel) "Hai, maaf kerana mengganggu anda melalui e-mel, tetapi saya tertanya-tanya adakah anda berpeluang untuk mengkaji semula PR saya" _
+> 😢 _(sebagai e-mel) "Hai, maaf kerana mengganggu anda melalui e-mel, tetapi saya tertanya-tanya adakah anda berpeluang untuk mengkaji semula PR saya"_
-** Tidak apa-apa untuk mengemukakan soalan (tetapi bersabarlah!). ** Semua orang baru dalam projek ini pada satu ketika, dan bahkan penyumbang yang berpengalaman perlu terus maju ketika mereka melihat projek baru. Dengan cara yang sama, penyelenggara lama juga tidak selalu mengenal setiap bahagian projek. Tunjukkan kepada mereka kesabaran yang sama seperti yang anda mahukan kepada mereka.
+**Tidak apa-apa untuk mengemukakan soalan (tetapi bersabarlah!).** Semua orang baru dalam projek ini pada satu ketika, dan bahkan penyumbang yang berpengalaman perlu terus maju ketika mereka melihat projek baru. Dengan cara yang sama, penyelenggara lama juga tidak selalu mengenal setiap bahagian projek. Tunjukkan kepada mereka kesabaran yang sama seperti yang anda mahukan kepada mereka.
-> 😇 _ "Terima kasih kerana melihat ralat ini. Saya mengikuti cadangan anda. Inilah hasilnya." _
+> 😇 _"Terima kasih kerana melihat ralat ini. Saya mengikuti cadangan anda. Inilah hasilnya."_
>
-> 😢 _ "Mengapa anda tidak dapat menyelesaikan masalah saya? Bukankah ini projek anda?" _
+> 😢 _"Mengapa anda tidak dapat menyelesaikan masalah saya? Bukankah ini projek anda?"_
-** Hormati keputusan masyarakat. ** Idea anda mungkin berbeza dengan keutamaan atau visi masyarakat. Mereka mungkin memberikan maklum balas atau memutuskan untuk tidak meneruskan idea anda. Walaupun anda harus berbincang dan mencari kompromi, penyelenggara harus mematuhi keputusan anda lebih lama daripada yang anda mahukan. Sekiranya anda tidak bersetuju dengan arahan mereka, anda sentiasa boleh menggunakan garpu anda sendiri atau memulakan projek anda sendiri.
+**Hormati keputusan masyarakat.** Idea anda mungkin berbeza dengan keutamaan atau visi masyarakat. Mereka mungkin memberikan maklum balas atau memutuskan untuk tidak meneruskan idea anda. Walaupun anda harus berbincang dan mencari kompromi, penyelenggara harus mematuhi keputusan anda lebih lama daripada yang anda mahukan. Sekiranya anda tidak bersetuju dengan arahan mereka, anda sentiasa boleh menggunakan garpu anda sendiri atau memulakan projek anda sendiri.
-> 😇 _ "Saya kecewa anda tidak dapat menyokong kes penggunaan saya, tetapi seperti yang anda jelaskan, ini hanya mempengaruhi sebahagian kecil pengguna, saya faham mengapa. Terima kasih kerana mendengar." _
+> 😇 _"Saya kecewa anda tidak dapat menyokong kes penggunaan saya, tetapi seperti yang anda jelaskan, ini hanya mempengaruhi sebahagian kecil pengguna, saya faham mengapa. Terima kasih kerana mendengar."_
>
-> 😢 _ "Mengapa anda tidak menyokong kes penggunaan saya? Ini tidak boleh diterima!" _
+> 😢 _"Mengapa anda tidak menyokong kes penggunaan saya? Ini tidak boleh diterima!"_
-** Yang terpenting, jaga agar tetap berkelas. ** Sumber terbuka terdiri daripada kolaborator dari seluruh dunia. Konteks hilang di seluruh bahasa, budaya, geografi, dan zon waktu. Di samping itu, komunikasi bertulis menjadikannya lebih sukar untuk menyampaikan nada atau mood. Anggap niat baik dalam perbualan ini. Adalah baik untuk menolak idea dengan sopan, meminta lebih banyak konteks, atau memperjelas kedudukan anda. Cubalah tinggalkan internet di tempat yang lebih baik daripada ketika anda menjumpainya.
+**Yang terpenting, jaga agar tetap berkelas.** Sumber terbuka terdiri daripada kolaborator dari seluruh dunia. Konteks hilang di seluruh bahasa, budaya, geografi, dan zon waktu. Di samping itu, komunikasi bertulis menjadikannya lebih sukar untuk menyampaikan nada atau mood. Anggap niat baik dalam perbualan ini. Adalah baik untuk menolak idea dengan sopan, meminta lebih banyak konteks, atau memperjelas kedudukan anda. Cubalah tinggalkan internet di tempat yang lebih baik daripada ketika anda menjumpainya.
### Mengumpulkan konteks
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ Sekiranya projek tersebut berada di GitHub, berikut adalah cara mengemukakan per
* **Uji perubahan anda!** Jalankan perubahan anda terhadap ujian yang ada jika ada dan buat yang baru bila diperlukan. Sama ada ujian ada atau tidak, pastikan perubahan anda tidak mematahkan projek yang ada.
* **Sumbang dalam gaya projek** dengan sebaik mungkin. Ini mungkin bermaksud menggunakan inden, titik koma atau komen yang berbeza daripada yang anda lakukan di repositori anda sendiri, tetapi memudahkan penyelenggara bergabung, yang lain memahami dan mengekalkannya di masa depan.
-Permintaan adalah permintaan permintaan pertama anda, periksa [Make a Pull Request](http://makeapullrequest.com/), yang @kentcdodds buat sebagai tutorial video panduan. Anda juga boleh berlatih membuat permintaan tarik di[First Contributions](https://github.com/Roshanjossey/first-contributions) repositori, dibuat oleh @Roshanjossey.
+Permintaan adalah permintaan pertama anda, periksa [Make a Pull Request](http://makeapullrequest.com/), yang @kentcdodds buat sebagai tutorial video panduan. Anda juga boleh berlatih membuat permintaan tarik di[First Contributions](https://github.com/Roshanjossey/first-contributions) repositori, dibuat oleh @Roshanjossey.
## Apa yang berlaku selepas anda menghantar sumbangan
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ Semoga anda[checked the project for signs of activity](#a-checklist-before-you-c
Sekiranya anda tidak mendapat sambutan selama lebih dari seminggu, adalah wajar untuk memberi respons dengan sopan dalam utas yang sama, meminta ulasan seseorang. Sekiranya anda mengetahui nama orang yang tepat untuk mengulas sumbangan anda, anda boleh @ -menyebutkannya dalam utas itu.
-** Jangan ** hubungi orang itu secara peribadi; ingat bahawa komunikasi awam sangat penting untuk projek sumber terbuka.
+**Jangan** hubungi orang itu secara peribadi; ingat bahawa komunikasi awam sangat penting untuk projek sumber terbuka.
Sekiranya anda membuat bongkahan yang sopan dan masih tidak ada yang bertindak balas, kemungkinan tidak ada yang akan bertindak balas. Ini bukan perasaan yang hebat, tetapi jangan biarkan itu mengecewakan anda. Ia berlaku kepada semua orang! Terdapat banyak kemungkinan sebab mengapa anda tidak mendapat sambutan, termasuk keadaan peribadi yang mungkin di luar kawalan anda. Cuba cari projek atau cara lain untuk menyumbang. Sekiranya ada, ini adalah alasan yang baik untuk tidak meluangkan terlalu banyak masa untuk membuat sumbangan sebelum anggota masyarakat lain terlibat dan responsif.
diff --git a/_articles/ms/leadership-and-governance.md b/_articles/ms/leadership-and-governance.md
index ef136dabfa6..971aa801001 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/leadership-and-governance.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/leadership-and-governance.md
@@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ Memformalkan peranan kepemimpinan anda membantu orang merasakan kepemilikan dan
Untuk projek yang lebih kecil, menetapkan pemimpin boleh semudah menambahkan nama mereka ke nama anda dalam fail README atau fail CONTRIBUTORS.
-
Untuk projek yang lebih besar, jika anda mempunyai laman web, buat halaman pasukan atau senaraikan pemimpin projek anda di sana. Sebagai contoh, [Postgres](https://github.com/postgres/postgres/) mempunyai [comprehensive team page](https://www.postgresql.org/community/contributors/) dengan profil pendek untuk setiap penyumbang.
Sekiranya projek anda mempunyai komuniti penyumbang yang sangat aktif, anda mungkin membentuk "pasukan teras" penyelenggara, atau bahkan jawatankuasa kecil orang yang mengambil alih bidang isu yang berbeza (contohnya keselamatan, pencetus masalah, atau tingkah laku masyarakat). Biarkan orang mengatur diri sendiri dan menjadi sukarelawan untuk peranan yang paling mereka gemari, daripada menyerahkannya.
diff --git a/_articles/ms/metrics.md b/_articles/ms/metrics.md
index dbd4a354d58..d11e3988913 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/metrics.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/metrics.md
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Dengan lebih banyak maklumat, anda boleh:
Contohnya, [Homebrew](https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/blob/bbed7246bc5c5b7acb8c1d427d10b43e090dfd39/docs/Analytics.md) mendapati bahawa Analitis Google membantu mereka mengutamakan kerja:
->Homebrew disediakan secara percuma dan dikendalikan sepenuhnya oleh sukarelawan pada masa lapang. Hasilnya, kami tidak mempunyai sumber untuk membuat kajian pengguna terperinci mengenai pengguna Homebrew untuk memutuskan cara terbaik untuk merancang ciri masa depan dan mengutamakan kerja semasa. Analisis pengguna agregat tanpa nama membolehkan kami mengutamakan pembaikan dan ciri berdasarkan bagaimana, di mana dan kapan orang menggunakan Homebrew.
+> Homebrew disediakan secara percuma dan dikendalikan sepenuhnya oleh sukarelawan pada masa lapang. Hasilnya, kami tidak mempunyai sumber untuk membuat kajian pengguna terperinci mengenai pengguna Homebrew untuk memutuskan cara terbaik untuk merancang ciri masa depan dan mengutamakan kerja semasa. Analisis pengguna agregat tanpa nama membolehkan kami mengutamakan pembaikan dan ciri berdasarkan bagaimana, di mana dan kapan orang menggunakan Homebrew.
Populariti bukan segalanya. Semua orang masuk ke sumber terbuka dengan alasan yang berbeza. Sekiranya matlamat anda sebagai penyelenggara sumber terbuka adalah untuk mempamerkan karya anda, bersikap telus mengenai kod anda, atau hanya bersenang-senang, metrik mungkin tidak penting bagi anda.
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Sekiranya anda berminat untuk memahami projek anda pada tahap yang lebih mendala
## Penemuan
-Sebelum ada yang dapat menggunakan atau menyumbang kembali ke projek anda, mereka perlu mengetahui bahawa ia wujud. Tanya pada diri anda: _apa orang mencari projek ini? _
+Sebelum ada yang dapat menggunakan atau menyumbang kembali ke projek anda, mereka perlu mengetahui bahawa ia wujud. Tanya pada diri anda: _apa orang mencari projek ini?_
![Traffic graph](/assets/images/metrics/repo_traffic_graphs_tooltip.png)
@@ -131,4 +131,4 @@ Anda juga dapat mengukur masa yang diperlukan untuk beralih antara tahap dalam p
## Gunakan 📊 untuk mengetahui tentang orang
-Memahami metrik akan membantu anda membina projek sumber terbuka yang aktif dan berkembang. Walaupun anda tidak melacak setiap metrik di papan pemuka, gunakan kerangka di atas untuk memusatkan perhatian anda pada jenis tingkah laku yang akan membantu projek anda berkembang maju.
\ No newline at end of file
+Memahami metrik akan membantu anda membina projek sumber terbuka yang aktif dan berkembang. Walaupun anda tidak melacak setiap metrik di papan pemuka, gunakan kerangka di atas untuk memusatkan perhatian anda pada jenis tingkah laku yang akan membantu projek anda berkembang maju.
diff --git a/_articles/ms/starting-a-project.md b/_articles/ms/starting-a-project.md
index 2f050162708..f5779160837 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/starting-a-project.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/starting-a-project.md
@@ -359,4 +359,4 @@ Sekiranya anda syarikat atau organisasi:
## Kamu lakukan!
-Tahniah kerana sumber terbuka projek pertama anda. Tidak kira hasilnya, bekerja di khalayak ramai adalah hadiah untuk masyarakat. Dengan setiap komitmen, komen, dan permintaan tarik, anda mencipta peluang untuk diri sendiri dan orang lain untuk belajar dan berkembang.
\ No newline at end of file
+Tahniah kerana sumber terbuka projek pertama anda. Tidak kira hasilnya, bekerja di khalayak ramai adalah hadiah untuk masyarakat. Dengan setiap komitmen, komen, dan permintaan tarik, anda mencipta peluang untuk diri sendiri dan orang lain untuk belajar dan berkembang.
From 1459d624f021f1783a5df9c3ed822ce37c368db5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KaynenStrife
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 02:08:25 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 044/749] fixed 2 more errors
---
_articles/ms/how-to-contribute.md | 13 +++++++------
_config.yml | 2 ++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/ms/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/ms/how-to-contribute.md
index f801cae42cc..79c13e398b4 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -78,12 +78,13 @@ Kesalahpahaman umum mengenai menyumbang kepada sumber terbuka ialah anda perlu m
Walaupun anda suka menulis kod, jenis sumbangan lain adalah kaedah terbaik untuk terlibat dengan projek dan bertemu dengan ahli komuniti lain. Membina hubungan tersebut akan memberi anda peluang untuk bekerja di bahagian lain projek.
+
-
- Saya pertama kali menghubungi pasukan pengembangan Python (aka python-dev) ketika saya menghantar e-mel kepada senarai mel pada 17 Jun 2002 mengenai penerimaan tampalan saya. Saya dengan cepat menangkap bug sumber terbuka, dan memutuskan untuk mula menguruskan pencernaan e-mel untuk kumpulan itu. Mereka memberi saya alasan yang baik untuk meminta penjelasan mengenai sesuatu topik, tetapi lebih kritikal saya dapat melihat ketika seseorang menunjukkan sesuatu yang perlu diperbaiki.
-
-— @brettcannon, ["Maintainer Stories"](https://github.com/open-source/stories/brettcannon)
-
+
+ Saya pertama kali menghubungi pasukan pengembangan Python (aka python-dev) ketika saya menghantar e-mel kepada senarai mel pada 17 Jun 2002 mengenai penerimaan tampalan saya. Saya dengan cepat menangkap bug sumber terbuka, dan memutuskan untuk mula menguruskan pencernaan e-mel untuk kumpulan itu. Mereka memberi saya alasan yang baik untuk meminta penjelasan mengenai sesuatu topik, tetapi lebih kritikal saya dapat melihat ketika seseorang menunjukkan sesuatu yang perlu diperbaiki.
+
+ — @brettcannon, ["Maintainer Stories"](https://github.com/open-source/stories/brettcannon)
+
### Adakah anda suka merancang acara?
@@ -423,7 +424,7 @@ Sebelum anda membuka masalah atau menarik permintaan, atau mengajukan soalan dal
**Jauhkan semua komunikasi untuk umum.** Walaupun menggoda, jangan menghubungi penyelenggara secara tertutup kecuali anda perlu berkongsi maklumat sensitif (seperti masalah keselamatan atau pelanggaran tingkah laku serius). Apabila perbualan anda tetap terbuka, lebih ramai orang dapat belajar dan mendapat faedah daripada pertukaran anda. Perbincangan boleh menjadi sumbangan mereka sendiri.
->😇 _(sebagai komen) "@ -maintainer Hai! Bagaimana kita harus meneruskan PR ini?"_
+> 😇 _(sebagai komen) "@ -maintainer Hai! Bagaimana kita harus meneruskan PR ini?"_
>
> 😢 _(sebagai e-mel) "Hai, maaf kerana mengganggu anda melalui e-mel, tetapi saya tertanya-tanya adakah anda berpeluang untuk mengkaji semula PR saya"_
diff --git a/_config.yml b/_config.yml
index b9075e8af22..760411a69ff 100644
--- a/_config.yml
+++ b/_config.yml
@@ -56,3 +56,5 @@ twitter:
facebook:
publisher: https://www.facebook.com/GitHub/
+
+github: [metadata]
\ No newline at end of file
From cdb6f1aa04e6d2893669d7b0f8fa4ce33069db63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KaynenStrife
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 02:17:19 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 045/749] trying to fix issue with metadata
---
_config.yml | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_config.yml b/_config.yml
index 760411a69ff..b9075e8af22 100644
--- a/_config.yml
+++ b/_config.yml
@@ -56,5 +56,3 @@ twitter:
facebook:
publisher: https://www.facebook.com/GitHub/
-
-github: [metadata]
\ No newline at end of file
From d99e4222e225fcafc58a7b0a394a4e1a8b41a9b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KaynenStrife
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 03:37:20 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 046/749] followed the required steps
---
_articles/ms/best-practices.md | 7 -------
_data/locales/ms.yml | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 _data/locales/ms.yml
diff --git a/_articles/ms/best-practices.md b/_articles/ms/best-practices.md
index 6522d93765a..658456d9997 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/best-practices.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/best-practices.md
@@ -3,13 +3,6 @@ lang: ms
title: Memulakan projek sumber terbuka
description: Ketahui lebih lanjut mengenai dunia sumber terbuka dan bersiap sedia untuk melancarkan projek anda sendiri.
class: best-practices
-toc:
- what-does-it-mean-to-be-a-maintainer: "Apa maksudnya menjadi pemelihara?"
- documenting-your-processes: "Mendokumentasikan proses anda"
- learning-to-say-no: "Belajar bila untuk mengatakan tidak"
- leverage-your-community: "Macamana manfaatkan komuniti anda"
- bring-in-the-robots: "belajar proses mana yang perlu automatik (robots)"
- its-okay-to-hit-pause: "Tidak apa-apa untuk berhenti sebentar"
order: 5
image: /assets/images/cards/best-practices.png
related:
diff --git a/_data/locales/ms.yml b/_data/locales/ms.yml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ac8316a2f6c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_data/locales/ms.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+en:
+ locale_name: Malay
+ nav:
+ about: Mengenai
+ contribute: Menyumbang
+ index:
+ lead: Perisian sumber terbuka dibuat oleh orang seperti anda. Ketahui cara melancarkan dan mengembangkan projek anda.
+ opensourcefriday: Hari Jumaat! Melabur beberapa jam dengan menyumbang kepada perisian yang anda gunakan dan sukai
+ article:
+ table_of_contents: Isi kandungan
+ back_to_all_guides: Kembali ke semua panduan
+ related_guides: Panduan Berkaitan
+ footer:
+ contribute:
+ heading: Menyumbang
+ description: Ingin membuat cadangan? Kandungan ini adalah sumber terbuka. Bantu kami memperbaikinya.
+ button: Menyumbang
+ subscribe:
+ heading: Terus berhubung
+ description: Jadilah orang pertama yang mendengar mengenai petua dan sumber sumber terbuka terkini GitHub.
+ label: Alamat emel
+ button: Langgan
+ byline:
+ # [code], [love], and [github] will be replaced by octicons
+ format: "[code] dengan [love] oleh [github] dan [friends]"
+ # Label for code octicon
+ code_label: kod
+ # Label for love octicon
+ love_label: cinta
+ # Label for the contributors link
+ friends_label: rakan
From ce6f6db7c885677e99b98a6fb5591aaf34abf755 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KaynenStrife
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 04:00:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 047/749] removed redundant README.md file
---
_articles/ms/README.md | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 _articles/ms/README.md
diff --git a/_articles/ms/README.md b/_articles/ms/README.md
deleted file mode 100644
index e409cfd0d51..00000000000
--- a/_articles/ms/README.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
----
-lang: ms
-title: README
-description: A README file with the intention of informing the usage of this folder, which translates the english language of the original file to the language of Malay, code = ms
----
-
From f53cb84c1b6008fc3584eb6669573c01bd2335ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KaynenStrife
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 04:37:55 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 048/749] testing fix href link issue
---
_articles/ms/building-community.md | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/_articles/ms/building-community.md b/_articles/ms/building-community.md
index 18a66960fb5..9c9caff5da3 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/building-community.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/building-community.md
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ Sebahagian besarnya, jika anda telah membina komuniti yang ramah, hormat dan men
Apabila komuniti anda bergelut dengan masalah yang sukar, kemarahan mungkin akan meningkat. Orang mungkin menjadi marah atau kecewa dan mengeluarkannya satu sama lain, atau pada anda.
-Tugas anda sebagai penyelenggara adalah untuk memastikan situasi ini tidak meningkat. Walaupun anda mempunyai pendapat yang kuat mengenai topik ini, cubalah mengambil kedudukan sebagai moderator atau fasilitator, daripada melompat ke dalam pertengkaran dan mendorong pandangan anda. Sekiranya seseorang bersikap tidak baik atau memonopoli perbualan, [act immediately](../building-community/#dont-tolerate-bad-actors) agar perbincangan tetap sopan dan produktif.
+Tugas anda sebagai penyelenggara adalah untuk memastikan situasi ini tidak meningkat. Walaupun anda mempunyai pendapat yang kuat mengenai topik ini, cubalah mengambil kedudukan sebagai moderator atau fasilitator, daripada melompat ke dalam pertengkaran dan mendorong pandangan anda. Sekiranya seseorang bersikap tidak baik atau memonopoli perbualan, [bertindak segera](../building-community/#jangan-bertolak-ansur-buruk-pelakon) agar perbincangan tetap sopan dan produktif.
From 1ff76d07fdbca02e1912bcc75528496893fd9ba8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KaynenStrife
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 04:50:03 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 049/749] Testing something
---
_articles/ms/building-community.md | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/_articles/ms/building-community.md b/_articles/ms/building-community.md
index 9c9caff5da3..e284c18e506 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/building-community.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/building-community.md
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ Oleh kerana projek anda menjadi lebih popular, lebih ramai orang akan tertarik d
Sebahagian besarnya, jika anda telah membina komuniti yang ramah, hormat dan mendokumentasikan proses anda secara terbuka, komuniti anda seharusnya dapat mencari penyelesaian. Tetapi kadang-kadang anda menghadapi masalah yang agak sukar untuk ditangani.
-### Tetapkan bar untuk kebaikan
+### jangan-bertolak-ansur-buruk-pelakon
Apabila komuniti anda bergelut dengan masalah yang sukar, kemarahan mungkin akan meningkat. Orang mungkin menjadi marah atau kecewa dan mengeluarkannya satu sama lain, atau pada anda.
From 76992d5ae00fd7968481ad8e91f7734b13603d91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KaynenStrife
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 04:57:46 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 050/749] I think i figured it out
---
_articles/ms/best-practices.md | 2 +-
_articles/ms/building-community.md | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/ms/best-practices.md b/_articles/ms/best-practices.md
index 658456d9997..1433cfceeca 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/best-practices.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/best-practices.md
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ Salah satu cara untuk mendapatkan penyumbang baru adalah dengan secara eksplisit
Apabila anda melihat penyumbang baru memberikan sumbangan berulang, kenali karya mereka dengan menawarkan lebih banyak tanggungjawab. Mendokumentasikan bagaimana orang lain dapat berkembang menjadi peranan kepemimpinan jika mereka mahu.
-Menggalakkan orang lain untuk [berkongsi pemilikan projek](../building-community/#share-ownership-of-your-project) dapat mengurangkan beban kerja anda sendiri, seperti yang dijumpai oleh @lmccart pada projeknya, [p5.js](https://github.com/processing/p5.js).
+Menggalakkan orang lain untuk [berkongsi pemilikan projek](../building-community/#berkongsi-pemilikan-projek) dapat mengurangkan beban kerja anda sendiri, seperti yang dijumpai oleh @lmccart pada projeknya, [p5.js](https://github.com/processing/p5.js).
diff --git a/_articles/ms/building-community.md b/_articles/ms/building-community.md
index e284c18e506..f166acf5d7a 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/building-community.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/building-community.md
@@ -193,11 +193,11 @@ Oleh kerana projek anda menjadi lebih popular, lebih ramai orang akan tertarik d
Sebahagian besarnya, jika anda telah membina komuniti yang ramah, hormat dan mendokumentasikan proses anda secara terbuka, komuniti anda seharusnya dapat mencari penyelesaian. Tetapi kadang-kadang anda menghadapi masalah yang agak sukar untuk ditangani.
-### jangan-bertolak-ansur-buruk-pelakon
+### Tetapkan bar untuk kebaikan
Apabila komuniti anda bergelut dengan masalah yang sukar, kemarahan mungkin akan meningkat. Orang mungkin menjadi marah atau kecewa dan mengeluarkannya satu sama lain, atau pada anda.
-Tugas anda sebagai penyelenggara adalah untuk memastikan situasi ini tidak meningkat. Walaupun anda mempunyai pendapat yang kuat mengenai topik ini, cubalah mengambil kedudukan sebagai moderator atau fasilitator, daripada melompat ke dalam pertengkaran dan mendorong pandangan anda. Sekiranya seseorang bersikap tidak baik atau memonopoli perbualan, [bertindak segera](../building-community/#jangan-bertolak-ansur-buruk-pelakon) agar perbincangan tetap sopan dan produktif.
+Tugas anda sebagai penyelenggara adalah untuk memastikan situasi ini tidak meningkat. Walaupun anda mempunyai pendapat yang kuat mengenai topik ini, cubalah mengambil kedudukan sebagai moderator atau fasilitator, daripada melompat ke dalam pertengkaran dan mendorong pandangan anda. Sekiranya seseorang bersikap tidak baik atau memonopoli perbualan, [bertindak segera](../building-community/#Jangan-bertolak-ansur-dengan-pelakon-jahat) agar perbincangan tetap sopan dan produktif.
From 8a4995da644ec87f019962a41ebc65c95a38d18f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KaynenStrife
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:19:30 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 051/749] fixing best-practices and building community
---
_articles/ms/best-practices.md | 2 +-
_articles/ms/building-community.md | 16 ++++++++--------
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/ms/best-practices.md b/_articles/ms/best-practices.md
index 1433cfceeca..082754401f4 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/best-practices.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/best-practices.md
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ Salah satu cara untuk mendapatkan penyumbang baru adalah dengan secara eksplisit
Apabila anda melihat penyumbang baru memberikan sumbangan berulang, kenali karya mereka dengan menawarkan lebih banyak tanggungjawab. Mendokumentasikan bagaimana orang lain dapat berkembang menjadi peranan kepemimpinan jika mereka mahu.
-Menggalakkan orang lain untuk [berkongsi pemilikan projek](../building-community/#berkongsi-pemilikan-projek) dapat mengurangkan beban kerja anda sendiri, seperti yang dijumpai oleh @lmccart pada projeknya, [p5.js](https://github.com/processing/p5.js).
+Menggalakkan orang lain untuk [berkongsi pemilikan projek](../building-community/#kongsi-pemilikan-projek-anda) dapat mengurangkan beban kerja anda sendiri, seperti yang dijumpai oleh @lmccart pada projeknya, [p5.js](https://github.com/processing/p5.js).
diff --git a/_articles/ms/building-community.md b/_articles/ms/building-community.md
index f166acf5d7a..f3c1bf0a3a7 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/building-community.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/building-community.md
@@ -30,16 +30,16 @@ Semasa anda membina komuniti, pertimbangkan bagaimana seseorang di bahagian atas
Mulakan dengan dokumentasi anda:
-* **Permudahkan seseorang untuk menggunakan projek anda.**[A friendly README](../starting-a-project/#writing-a-readme) dan contoh kod yang jelas akan memudahkan sesiapa sahaja yang memasuki projek anda untuk memulakan.
-* **Terangkan dengan jelas cara menyumbang**, menggunakan [your CONTRIBUTING file](../starting-a-project/#writing-your-contributing-guidelines) dan mengemas kini masalah anda.
-* **Isu pertama yang baik**: Untuk membantu penyumbang baru memulakan, pertimbangkan secara jelas [labeling issues that are simple enough for beginners to tackle](https://help.github.com/en/articles/helping-new-contributors-find-your-project-with-labels). GitHub kemudian akan memaparkan isu-isu ini di berbagai tempat di platform, meningkatkan sumbangan berguna, dan mengurangkan geseran dari pengguna menangani masalah yang terlalu sukar untuk tahap mereka.
+* **Permudahkan seseorang untuk menggunakan projek anda.**[README yang mesra](../starting-a-project/#menulis-readme) dan contoh kod yang jelas akan memudahkan sesiapa sahaja yang memasuki projek anda untuk memulakan.
+* **Terangkan dengan jelas cara menyumbang**, menggunakan [fail CONTRIBUTING anda](../starting-a-project/#menulis-garis-panduan-penyumbang-anda) dan mengemas kini masalah anda.
+* **Isu pertama yang baik**: Untuk membantu penyumbang baru memulakan, pertimbangkan secara jelas [masalah pelabelan yang cukup mudah untuk diatasi oleh pemula](https://help.github.com/en/articles/helping-new-contributors-find-your-project-with-labels). GitHub kemudian akan memaparkan isu-isu ini di berbagai tempat di platform, meningkatkan sumbangan berguna, dan mengurangkan geseran dari pengguna menangani masalah yang terlalu sukar untuk tahap mereka.
[GitHub's 2017 Open Source Survey](http://opensourcesurvey.org/2017/) menunjukkan dokumentasi yang tidak lengkap atau membingungkan adalah masalah terbesar bagi pengguna sumber terbuka. Dokumentasi yang baik mengundang orang untuk berinteraksi dengan projek anda. Akhirnya, seseorang akan membuka masalah atau menarik permintaan. Gunakan interaksi ini sebagai peluang untuk mengalihkannya ke corong.
* **Apabila seseorang baru memasuki projek anda, terima kasih atas minat mereka!** Hanya memerlukan satu pengalaman negatif untuk membuat seseorang tidak mahu kembali.
* **Bersikap responsif.** Sekiranya anda tidak menjawab masalah mereka selama sebulan, kemungkinannya, mereka sudah melupakan projek anda.
-* **Berfikiran terbuka tentang jenis sumbangan yang akan anda terima.** Banyak penyumbang bermula dengan laporan bug atau perbaikan kecil. Disana ada[many ways to contribute](../how-to-contribute/#what-it-means-to-contribute) ke projek. Biarkan orang menolong bagaimana mereka mahu menolong.
-* **Sekiranya ada sumbangan yang anda tidak setuju,** terima kasih atas idea mereka dan [explain why](../best-practices/#learning-to-say-no) ini tidak sesuai dengan skop projek, menghubungkan ke dokumentasi yang relevan jika anda memilikinya.
+* **Berfikiran terbuka tentang jenis sumbangan yang akan anda terima.** Banyak penyumbang bermula dengan laporan bug atau perbaikan kecil. Disana ada[banyak cara untuk menyumbang](../how-to-contribute/#apa-maksudnya-menyumbang) ke projek. Biarkan orang menolong bagaimana mereka mahu menolong.
+* **Sekiranya ada sumbangan yang anda tidak setuju,** terima kasih atas idea mereka dan [terangkan mengapa](../best-practices/#belajar-bila-untuk-mengatakan-tidak) ini tidak sesuai dengan skop projek, menghubungkan ke dokumentasi yang relevan jika anda memilikinya.
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Mendokumentasikan segala-galanya juga berlaku untuk pekerjaan yang anda lakukan.
### Bersikap responsif
-Seperti awak[promote your project](../finding-users), orang akan mempunyai maklum balas untuk anda. Mereka mungkin mempunyai pertanyaan tentang bagaimana sesuatu berfungsi, atau memerlukan bantuan untuk memulai.
+Seperti awak[mempromosikan projek anda](../finding-users), orang akan mempunyai maklum balas untuk anda. Mereka mungkin mempunyai pertanyaan tentang bagaimana sesuatu berfungsi, atau memerlukan bantuan untuk memulai.
Try responsif ketika seseorang mengajukan masalah, mengajukan permintaan tarik, atau mengajukan pertanyaan mengenai projek anda. Apabila anda bertindak balas dengan cepat, orang akan merasakan mereka adalah sebahagian daripada dialog, dan mereka akan lebih bersemangat untuk turut serta.
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ Lakukan yang terbaik untuk mengamalkan dasar toleransi sifar terhadap jenis oran
Perbahasan berkala mengenai aspek sepele projek anda mengalihkan perhatian orang lain, termasuk anda, daripada memfokus pada tugas penting. Orang baru yang tiba ke projek anda mungkin melihat perbualan ini dan tidak mahu mengambil bahagian.
-Apabila anda melihat tingkah laku negatif berlaku pada projek anda, panggilnya secara terbuka. Jelaskan, dengan nada yang baik tetapi tegas, mengapa tingkah laku mereka tidak dapat diterima. Sekiranya masalah itu berlanjutan, anda mungkin perlu [ask them to leave](../code-of-conduct/#enforcing-your-code-of-conduct). Your [code of conduct](../code-of-conduct/) boleh menjadi panduan yang membina untuk perbualan ini.
+Apabila anda melihat tingkah laku negatif berlaku pada projek anda, panggilnya secara terbuka. Jelaskan, dengan nada yang baik tetapi tegas, mengapa tingkah laku mereka tidak dapat diterima. Sekiranya masalah itu berlanjutan, anda mungkin perlu [minta mereka pergi](../code-of-conduct/#menguatkuasakan-tatakelakuan-anda). Kamu punya [tatakelakuan](../code-of-conduct/) boleh menjadi panduan yang membina untuk perbualan ini.
### Temui penyumbang di mana mereka berada
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ Menjaga kesegaran anda tidak mudah, tetapi menunjukkan kepemimpinan dapat mening
### Perlakukan README anda sebagai perlembagaan
-README anda adalah [more than just a set of instructions](../starting-a-project/#writing-a-readme). Ia juga merupakan tempat untuk membincangkan tujuan, visi produk, dan peta jalan anda. Sekiranya orang terlalu fokus memperdebatkan kelebihan ciri tertentu, ia mungkin dapat meninjau semula README anda dan membincangkan visi projek anda yang lebih tinggi. Memfokuskan pada README anda juga melumpuhkan perbualan, sehingga anda dapat mengadakan perbincangan yang membina.
+README anda adalah [lebih daripada sekumpulan arahan](../starting-a-project/#menulis-readme). Ia juga merupakan tempat untuk membincangkan tujuan, visi produk, dan peta jalan anda. Sekiranya orang terlalu fokus memperdebatkan kelebihan ciri tertentu, ia mungkin dapat meninjau semula README anda dan membincangkan visi projek anda yang lebih tinggi. Memfokuskan pada README anda juga melumpuhkan perbualan, sehingga anda dapat mengadakan perbincangan yang membina.
### Fokus pada perjalanan, bukan destinasi
From 03865ca685d69ad07fcb09af260abc8ee08c52cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KaynenStrife
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:38:40 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 052/749] fixed internal links
---
_articles/ms/building-community.md | 2 +-
_articles/ms/how-to-contribute.md | 2 +-
_articles/ms/leadership-and-governance.md | 4 ++--
_articles/ms/legal.md | 6 +++---
_articles/ms/starting-a-project.md | 2 +-
5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/ms/building-community.md b/_articles/ms/building-community.md
index f3c1bf0a3a7..b4ff42130ba 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/building-community.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/building-community.md
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ Sebahagian besarnya, jika anda telah membina komuniti yang ramah, hormat dan men
Apabila komuniti anda bergelut dengan masalah yang sukar, kemarahan mungkin akan meningkat. Orang mungkin menjadi marah atau kecewa dan mengeluarkannya satu sama lain, atau pada anda.
-Tugas anda sebagai penyelenggara adalah untuk memastikan situasi ini tidak meningkat. Walaupun anda mempunyai pendapat yang kuat mengenai topik ini, cubalah mengambil kedudukan sebagai moderator atau fasilitator, daripada melompat ke dalam pertengkaran dan mendorong pandangan anda. Sekiranya seseorang bersikap tidak baik atau memonopoli perbualan, [bertindak segera](../building-community/#Jangan-bertolak-ansur-dengan-pelakon-jahat) agar perbincangan tetap sopan dan produktif.
+Tugas anda sebagai penyelenggara adalah untuk memastikan situasi ini tidak meningkat. Walaupun anda mempunyai pendapat yang kuat mengenai topik ini, cubalah mengambil kedudukan sebagai moderator atau fasilitator, daripada melompat ke dalam pertengkaran dan mendorong pandangan anda. Sekiranya seseorang bersikap tidak baik atau memonopoli perbualan, [bertindak segera](../building-community/#jangan-bertolak-ansur-dengan-pelakon-jahat) agar perbincangan tetap sopan dan produktif.
diff --git a/_articles/ms/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/ms/how-to-contribute.md
index 79c13e398b4..fbfe4256d46 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ Selepas anda menghantar sumbangan, salah satu perkara berikut akan berlaku:
### 😭 Anda tidak mendapat sambutan.
-Semoga anda[checked the project for signs of activity](#a-checklist-before-you-contribute)sebelum memberi sumbangan. Walaupun pada projek yang aktif, kemungkinan sumbangan anda tidak mendapat sambutan.
+Semoga anda[memeriksa projek untuk tanda-tanda aktiviti](#senarai-semak-sebelum-anda-menyumbang)sebelum memberi sumbangan. Walaupun pada projek yang aktif, kemungkinan sumbangan anda tidak mendapat sambutan.
Sekiranya anda tidak mendapat sambutan selama lebih dari seminggu, adalah wajar untuk memberi respons dengan sopan dalam utas yang sama, meminta ulasan seseorang. Sekiranya anda mengetahui nama orang yang tepat untuk mengulas sumbangan anda, anda boleh @ -menyebutkannya dalam utas itu.
diff --git a/_articles/ms/leadership-and-governance.md b/_articles/ms/leadership-and-governance.md
index 971aa801001..5b5ab1fb9a5 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/leadership-and-governance.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/leadership-and-governance.md
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Penyelenggara tidak semestinya menjadi seseorang yang menulis kod untuk projek a
**Istilah "committer"** mungkin digunakan untuk membezakan akses komit, yang merupakan jenis tanggungjawab tertentu, dari bentuk sumbangan lain.
-Walaupun anda dapat menentukan peranan projek anda dengan cara yang anda mahukan, [consider using broader definitions](../how-to-contribute/#what-it-means-to-contribute) untuk mendorong lebih banyak bentuk sumbangan. Anda boleh menggunakan peranan kepemimpinan untuk mengenali secara rasmi orang yang telah memberikan sumbangan yang luar biasa untuk projek anda, tanpa mengira kemahiran teknikal mereka.
+Walaupun anda dapat menentukan peranan projek anda dengan cara yang anda mahukan, [pertimbangkan untuk menggunakan definisi yang lebih luas](../how-to-contribute/#apa-maksudnya-menyumbang) untuk mendorong lebih banyak bentuk sumbangan. Anda boleh menggunakan peranan kepemimpinan untuk mengenali secara rasmi orang yang telah memberikan sumbangan yang luar biasa untuk projek anda, tanpa mengira kemahiran teknikal mereka.
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ Setelah anda menentukan peranan kepemimpinan, jangan lupa untuk mendokumentasika
Alatan seperti [Vossibility](https://github.com/icecrime/vossibility-stack) dapat membantu anda mengesan secara terbuka siapa (atau tidak) yang menyumbang kepada projek tersebut. Mendokumentasikan maklumat ini mengelakkan persepsi masyarakat bahawa penyelenggara adalah klise yang membuat keputusannya secara tertutup.
-Akhirnya, jika projek anda berada di GitHub, pertimbangkan untuk memindahkan projek anda dari akaun peribadi anda ke Organisasi dan tambahkan sekurang-kurangnya satu pentadbir sandaran. [GitHub Organizations](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-new-organization-account/)mempermudah untuk menguruskan kebenaran dan beberapa repositori dan melindungi warisan projek anda melalui [shared ownership](../building-community/#share-ownership-of-your-project).
+Akhirnya, jika projek anda berada di GitHub, pertimbangkan untuk memindahkan projek anda dari akaun peribadi anda ke Organisasi dan tambahkan sekurang-kurangnya satu pentadbir sandaran. [GitHub Organizations](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-new-organization-account/)mempermudah untuk menguruskan kebenaran dan beberapa repositori dan melindungi warisan projek anda melalui [pemilikan bersama](../building-community/#kongsi-pemilikan-projek-anda).
## Bilakah saya harus memberikan akses kepada seseorang?
diff --git a/_articles/ms/legal.md b/_articles/ms/legal.md
index d3e6e3f49ea..6ac6d8a0a2a 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/legal.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/legal.md
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ Anda mungkin juga ingin mempertimbangkan **komuniti** yang anda harap akan mengg
* **Adakah anda mahu projek anda menarik minat perniagaan besar?** Perniagaan besar kemungkinan akan memerlukan lesen paten ekspres dari semua penyumbang. Dalam kes ini, [Apache 2.0](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/)adakah anda (dan mereka) dilindungi.
* **Adakah anda mahu projek anda menarik minat penyumbang yang tidak mahu sumbangan mereka digunakan dalam perisian sumber tertutup?**[GPLv3](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/gpl-3.0/) atau (jika mereka juga tidak mahu menyumbang kepada perkhidmatan sumber tertutup) [AGPLv3](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/agpl-3.0/)akan berjalan lancar.
-**Syarikat** anda mungkin mempunyai syarat pelesenan khusus untuk projek sumber terbuka. Sebagai contoh, ia mungkin memerlukan lesen yang boleh diterima agar syarikat dapat menggunakan projek anda dalam produk sumber tertutup syarikat. Atau syarikat anda mungkin memerlukan lesen copyleft yang kuat dan perjanjian penyumbang tambahan (lihat di bawah) sehingga hanya syarikat anda, dan tidak ada orang lain, yang dapat menggunakan projek anda dalam perisian sumber tertutup. Atau syarikat anda mungkin mempunyai keperluan tertentu yang berkaitan dengan standard, tanggungjawab sosial, atau ketelusan, yang mana mungkin memerlukan strategi pelesenan tertentu. Bercakap dengan anda[company's legal department](#what-does-my-companys-legal-team-need-to-know).
+**Syarikat** anda mungkin mempunyai syarat pelesenan khusus untuk projek sumber terbuka. Sebagai contoh, ia mungkin memerlukan lesen yang boleh diterima agar syarikat dapat menggunakan projek anda dalam produk sumber tertutup syarikat. Atau syarikat anda mungkin memerlukan lesen copyleft yang kuat dan perjanjian penyumbang tambahan (lihat di bawah) sehingga hanya syarikat anda, dan tidak ada orang lain, yang dapat menggunakan projek anda dalam perisian sumber tertutup. Atau syarikat anda mungkin mempunyai keperluan tertentu yang berkaitan dengan standard, tanggungjawab sosial, atau ketelusan, yang mana mungkin memerlukan strategi pelesenan tertentu. Bercakap dengan anda[jabatan undang-undang syarikat](#apa-yang-perlu-diketahui-oleh-pasukan-undang-undang-syarikat-saya).
Apabila anda membuat projek baru di GitHub, anda diberi pilihan untuk memilih lesen. Menyertakan salah satu lesen yang disebutkan di atas akan menjadikan projek GitHub anda sebagai sumber terbuka. Sekiranya anda ingin melihat pilihan lain, periksa [choosealicense.com](https://choosealicense.com) untuk mencari lesen yang sesuai untuk projek anda, walaupun ia [isn't software](https://choosealicense.com/non-software/).
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ Untuk lebih baik atau lebih buruk, pertimbangkan untuk memberitahu mereka walaup
* **Paten:** Adakah syarikat anda memohon paten yang merupakan sumber terbuka projek anda [public disclosure](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_disclosure)? Malangnya, anda mungkin diminta untuk menunggu (atau mungkin syarikat akan mempertimbangkan semula kebijaksanaan permohonan). Sekiranya anda mengharapkan sumbangan untuk projek anda dari pekerja syarikat dengan portfolio paten yang besar, pasukan undang-undang anda mungkin mahu anda menggunakan lesen dengan pemberian paten ekspres dari penyumbang (seperti Apache 2.0 atau GPLv3), atau perjanjian penyumbang tambahan ( lihat di atas).
-* **Tanda Dagangan:** Periksa semula nama projek anda[does not conflict with any existing trademarks](../starting-a-project/#avoiding-name-conflicts). Sekiranya anda menggunakan tanda dagangan syarikat anda sendiri dalam projek, periksa bahawa ia tidak menimbulkan konflik. [FOSSmarks](http://fossmarks.org/)adalah panduan praktikal untuk memahami tanda dagangan dalam konteks projek sumber bebas dan terbuka.
+* **Tanda Dagangan:** Periksa semula nama projek anda[tidak bertentangan dengan tanda dagangan yang ada](../starting-a-project/#mengelakkan-konflik-nama). Sekiranya anda menggunakan tanda dagangan syarikat anda sendiri dalam projek, periksa bahawa ia tidak menimbulkan konflik. [FOSSmarks](http://fossmarks.org/)adalah panduan praktikal untuk memahami tanda dagangan dalam konteks projek sumber bebas dan terbuka.
* **Privasi:** Adakah projek anda mengumpulkan data pengguna? "Telefon rumah" ke pelayan syarikat? Pasukan undang-undang anda dapat membantu anda mematuhi dasar syarikat dan peraturan luaran.
@@ -163,4 +163,4 @@ Jangka panjang, pasukan undang-undang anda boleh melakukan lebih banyak perkara
* **Paten:** Syarikat anda mungkin ingin bergabung dengan[Open Invention Network](https://www.openinventionnetwork.com/), kumpulan paten pertahanan bersama untuk melindungi penggunaan projek sumber terbuka utama anggota, atau meneroka yang lain[alternative patent licensing](https://www.eff.org/document/hacking-patent-system-2016).
-* **Tadbir urus:** Terutama jika dan bila masuk akal untuk memindahkan projek ke [legal entity outside of the company](../leadership-and-governance/#do-i-need-a-legal-entity-to-support-my-project).
+* **Tadbir urus:** Terutama jika dan bila masuk akal untuk memindahkan projek ke [entiti undang-undang di luar syarikat](../leadership-and-governance/#adakah-saya-memerlukan-entiti-undang-undang-untuk-menyokong-projek-saya).
diff --git a/_articles/ms/starting-a-project.md b/_articles/ms/starting-a-project.md
index f5779160837..c501437da9b 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/starting-a-project.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/starting-a-project.md
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Apabila projek adalah sumber terbuka, itu bermaksud **siapa sahaja bebas menggun
Sumber terbuka sangat kuat kerana ia dapat mengurangkan halangan untuk menerima pakai dan berkolaborasi, memungkinkan orang menyebarkan dan memperbaiki projek dengan cepat. Juga kerana memberi pengguna potensi untuk mengendalikan pengkomputeran mereka sendiri, berbanding dengan sumber tertutup. Sebagai contoh, perniagaan yang menggunakan perisian sumber terbuka mempunyai pilihan untuk mengupah seseorang untuk membuat penambahbaikan khusus pada perisian, daripada hanya bergantung pada keputusan produk penjual sumber tertutup.
-_Perisian percuma_ merujuk kepada set projek yang sama dengan _open source_. Kadang-kadang anda juga akan melihat[these terms](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_and_open-source_software) digabungkan sebagai "perisian sumber bebas dan terbuka" (FOSS) atau "perisian bebas, bebas, dan sumber terbuka" (FLOSS). _Free_ dan _libre_ merujuk kepada kebebasan,[not price](#does-open-source-mean-free-of-charge).
+_Perisian percuma_ merujuk kepada set projek yang sama dengan _open source_. Kadang-kadang anda juga akan melihat[these terms](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_and_open-source_software) digabungkan sebagai "perisian sumber bebas dan terbuka" (FOSS) atau "perisian bebas, bebas, dan sumber terbuka" (FLOSS). _Free_ dan _libre_ merujuk kepada kebebasan,[bukan harga](#adakah-sumber-terbuka-bermaksud-percuma).
### Mengapa orang membuka sumber pekerjaan mereka?
From dcfcb0b3bfe965e603e401301a4233a3632da658 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Linksvayer
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2020 16:34:05 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 053/749] format
---
_articles/ms/how-to-contribute.md | 10 +++++-----
_data/locales/ms.yml | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/ms/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/ms/how-to-contribute.md
index fbfe4256d46..55cd3025be8 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -80,11 +80,11 @@ Kesalahpahaman umum mengenai menyumbang kepada sumber terbuka ialah anda perlu m
Walaupun anda suka menulis kod, jenis sumbangan lain adalah kaedah terbaik untuk terlibat dengan projek dan bertemu dengan ahli komuniti lain. Membina hubungan tersebut akan memberi anda peluang untuk bekerja di bahagian lain projek.
-
- Saya pertama kali menghubungi pasukan pengembangan Python (aka python-dev) ketika saya menghantar e-mel kepada senarai mel pada 17 Jun 2002 mengenai penerimaan tampalan saya. Saya dengan cepat menangkap bug sumber terbuka, dan memutuskan untuk mula menguruskan pencernaan e-mel untuk kumpulan itu. Mereka memberi saya alasan yang baik untuk meminta penjelasan mengenai sesuatu topik, tetapi lebih kritikal saya dapat melihat ketika seseorang menunjukkan sesuatu yang perlu diperbaiki.
-
- — @brettcannon, ["Maintainer Stories"](https://github.com/open-source/stories/brettcannon)
-
+
+ Saya pertama kali menghubungi pasukan pengembangan Python (aka python-dev) ketika saya menghantar e-mel kepada senarai mel pada 17 Jun 2002 mengenai penerimaan tampalan saya. Saya dengan cepat menangkap bug sumber terbuka, dan memutuskan untuk mula menguruskan pencernaan e-mel untuk kumpulan itu. Mereka memberi saya alasan yang baik untuk meminta penjelasan mengenai sesuatu topik, tetapi lebih kritikal saya dapat melihat ketika seseorang menunjukkan sesuatu yang perlu diperbaiki.
+
+— @brettcannon, ["Maintainer Stories"](https://github.com/open-source/stories/brettcannon)
+
### Adakah anda suka merancang acara?
diff --git a/_data/locales/ms.yml b/_data/locales/ms.yml
index ac8316a2f6c..b904a445625 100644
--- a/_data/locales/ms.yml
+++ b/_data/locales/ms.yml
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-en:
+ms:
locale_name: Malay
nav:
about: Mengenai
From fba71a138b0b2ef3a3adaef0ce035183d13b80e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KaynenStrife
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:09:55 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 054/749] filled in missing translations in building-community
and metrics
---
_articles/ms/building-community.md | 6 +++---
_articles/ms/metrics.md | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/ms/building-community.md b/_articles/ms/building-community.md
index b4ff42130ba..649d8addb41 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/building-community.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/building-community.md
@@ -165,11 +165,11 @@ Lihat apakah anda boleh mencari cara untuk berkongsi pemilikan dengan komuniti a
![Cookiecutter issue](/assets/images/building-community/cookiecutter_submit_pr.png)
-* **Mulakan fail CONTRIBUTORS atau AUTHORS dalam projek anda** yang menyenaraikan semua orang yang menyumbang untuk projek anda, seperti [Sinatra](https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/blob/HEAD/AUTHORS.md) does.
+* **Mulakan fail CONTRIBUTORS atau AUTHORS dalam projek anda** yang menyenaraikan semua orang yang menyumbang untuk projek anda, seperti [Sinatra](https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/blob/HEAD/AUTHORS.md)
-* Sekiranya anda mempunyai komuniti yang cukup besar, **menghantar surat berita atau menulis catatan blog** mengucapkan terima kasih kepada penyumbang. Rust's [This Week in Rust](https://this-week-in-rust.org/) and Hoodie's [Shoutouts](http://hood.ie/blog/shoutouts-week-24.html) adalah dua contoh yang baik.
+* Sekiranya anda mempunyai komuniti yang cukup besar, **menghantar surat berita atau menulis catatan blog** mengucapkan terima kasih kepada penyumbang. Penyumbang Rust [This Week in Rust](https://this-week-in-rust.org/) dan penyumbang Hoodie [Shoutouts](http://hood.ie/blog/shoutouts-week-24.html) adalah dua contoh yang baik.
-* **Berikan akses kepada setiap penyumbang.** @felixge mendapati bahawa ini menjadikan orang[more excited to polish their patches](https://felixge.de/2013/03/11/the-pull-request-hack.html), and he even found new maintainers for projects that he hadn't worked on in awhile.
+* **Berikan akses kepada setiap penyumbang.** @felixge mendapati bahawa ini menjadikan orang [lebih teruja untuk menggilap patch mereka](https://felixge.de/2013/03/11/the-pull-request-hack.html), dan dia malah menjumpai penyelenggara baru untuk projek-projek yang belum pernah dia kerjakan sebentar lagi.
* Sekiranya projek anda berada di GitHub, **pindahkan projek anda dari akaun peribadi anda ke [Organization](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-new-organization-account/)** dan tambahkan sekurang-kurangnya satu pentadbir sandaran. Organisasi menjadikannya lebih mudah untuk mengerjakan projek dengan kolaborator luar.
diff --git a/_articles/ms/metrics.md b/_articles/ms/metrics.md
index d11e3988913..192aa8441cb 100644
--- a/_articles/ms/metrics.md
+++ b/_articles/ms/metrics.md
@@ -65,11 +65,11 @@ Sekiranya anda menggunakan pengurus pakej, seperti npm atau RubyGems.org, untuk
Setiap pengurus pakej boleh menggunakan definisi "download" yang sedikit berbeza, dan muat turuntuk mengesan statistik penggunaan di banyak pengurus pakej yang popular.
-Sekiranya projek anda berada di GitHub, arahkan kembali ke halaman "Traffic". Anda boleh menggunakanun tidak semestinya berkaitan dengan pemasangan atau penggunaan, tetapi menyediakan beberapa asas untuk perbandingan. Cuba gunakan [Libraries.io](https://libraries.io/) to track usage statistics across many popular package managers.
+Sekiranya projek anda berada di GitHub, arahkan kembali ke halaman "Traffic". Anda boleh menggunakanun tidak semestinya berkaitan dengan pemasangan atau penggunaan, tetapi menyediakan beberapa asas untuk perbandingan. Cuba gunakan [Libraries.io](https://libraries.io/) untuk mengesan statistik penggunaan di banyak pengurus pakej yang popular.
-If your project is on GitHub, navigate again to the "Traffic" page. You can use the [clone graph](https://github.com/blog/1873-clone-graphs) to see how many times your project has been cloned on a given day, broken down by total clones and unique cloners.
+Sekiranya projek anda berada di GitHub, arahkan kembali ke halaman "Traffic". Anda boleh menggunakan[graf klon](https://github.com/blog/1873-clone-graphs) untuk melihat berapa kali projek anda diklon pada hari tertentu, dipecah berdasarkan jumlah klon dan klon unik.
-![Clone graph](/assets/images/metrics/clone_graph.png)
+![graf klon](/assets/images/metrics/clone_graph.png)
Sekiranya penggunaannya rendah berbanding dengan jumlah orang yang menemui projek anda, ada dua masalah yang perlu dipertimbangkan. Sama ada:
From f8fd82229422d4545a8f428d1aac94141a6ddf53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kyoungae Kim
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 18:22:31 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 055/749] Update legal.md
Clarify the meaning
---
_articles/ko/legal.md | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/ko/legal.md b/_articles/ko/legal.md
index 159ee742d76..aca341aa5cc 100644
--- a/_articles/ko/legal.md
+++ b/_articles/ko/legal.md
@@ -12,17 +12,17 @@ related:
## Understanding the legal implications of open source
-세계와 창의적인 작업을 공유하는 것은 흥미롭고 보람있는 경험이 될 수 있습니다. 그것은 또한 당신이 모른다고 걱정해야한다는 것을 합법적이라는 걸로 의미 할 수 있습니다. 고맙게도 처음부터 다시 시작할 필요는 없습니다. 귀하의 법적 요구 사항이 있습니다. (이 내용을 파기전에, [면책조항](/notices/)을 읽으십시오.)
+세계와 창의적인 작업을 공유하는 것은 흥미롭고 보람있는 경험이 될 수 있습니다. 그것은 또한 당신이 걱정해야 했지만 잘 몰랐던 여러 법적 문제를 의미할 수도 있습니다. 고맙게도 처음부터 다시 시작할 필요는 없습니다. 귀하의 법적 요구 사항이 있습니다. (이 내용을 파기전에, [면책조항](/notices/)을 읽으십시오.)
## Why do people care so much about the legal side of open source?
-물어봤다는건 다행입니다! 창의적인 작업(작성, 그래픽 또는 코드)을 할 때, 그 저작물은 기본적으로 독점적인 저작권하에 있습니다. 즉, 법은 귀하의 저작물의 작성자로서 다른 사람들이 할 수 있는 것에 대해 귀하가 말하고있는 것으로 간주합니다.
+물어봤다는건 다행입니다! 창의적인 작업(작성, 그래픽 또는 코드)을 할 때, 그 저작물은 기본적으로 독점적인 저작권하에 있습니다. 즉, 법은 귀하를 저작물의 작성자로서 다른 사람들이 할 수 있는 것에 대해 귀하가 말하고있는 것으로 간주합니다.
-일반적으로, 이는 타인이 인계, 훼손 또는 소송의 위험이 없이 작업을 사용, 복사, 배포 또는 수정할 수 있음을 의미합니다.
+일반적으로, 이는 타인이 인계, 훼손 또는 소송의 위험이 없이 작업을 사용, 복사, 배포 또는 수정할 수 없음을 의미합니다.
그러나 오픈소스는 다른 사람들이 작업을 사용, 수정 및 공유하기를 기대하기 때문에 드문 경우입니다. 그러나 법적 기본값은 독점적인 저작권이므로 명시적으로 이러한 사용 권한을 명시한 사용권이 필요합니다.
-오픈소스 라이선스를 신청하지 않으면, 프로젝트에 기여한 모든 사람도 자신의 저작물의 독점적인 저작권자가 됩니다. 즉, 아무도 자신의 기여를 사용, 복사, 배포 또는 수정할 수 없으며 "아무도"에서는 귀하를 포함하지 않는다는 의미입니다.
+오픈소스 라이선스를 적용하지 않으면, 프로젝트에 기여한 모든 사람도 자신의 저작물의 독점적인 저작권자가 됩니다. 즉, 아무도 자신의 기여를 사용, 복사, 배포 또는 수정할 수 없으며 "아무도"에서는 귀하를 포함하지 않는다는 의미입니다.
마지막으로, 프로젝트는 사용자가 알지 못하는 라이선스 요구 사항과의 종속성을 가질 수 있습니다. 프로젝트의 커뮤니티 또는 고용주의 정책에 따라 프로젝트에서 특정 오픈소스 라이선스를 사용해야 할 수도 있습니다. 아래에서 이러한 상황을 다룰 것입니다.
@@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ related:
![Create repository](/assets/images/legal/repo-create-name.png)
-**GitHub 프로젝트를 공개하는 것은 프로젝트 라이센싱과 동일하지 않습니다.** 공개 프로젝트는 [GitHub의 서비스 약관](https://help.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-terms-of-service#3-ownership-of-content-right-to-post-and-license-grants)에 명시되어 있으며, 다른 사람들이 프로젝트를 포크화할 수는 있지만, 그렇지 않은 경우에는 권한이 없습니다.
+**GitHub 프로젝트를 공개하는 것은 프로젝트 라이센싱과 동일하지 않습니다.** 공개 프로젝트는 [GitHub의 서비스 약관](https://help.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-terms-of-service#3-ownership-of-content-right-to-post-and-license-grants)에 명시되어 있으며, 다른 사람들이 프로젝트를 보거나 포크할 수는 있지만, 다른 권한은 없습니다.
-다른 사람들이 프로젝트를 사용, 복사, 수정 또는 다시 사용할 수 있게하려면, 오픈소스 라이선스를 포함해야합니다. 예를 들어, 권한을 부여하지 않는다는 조건에서는 공개적으로 GitHub 프로젝트의 일부를 코드에 명시적으로 사용할 수는 없습니다.
+다른 사람들이 프로젝트를 사용, 복사, 수정 또는 다시 사용할 수 있게하려면, 오픈소스 라이선스를 포함해야합니다. 예를 들어, Github 프로젝트가 공개되어 있다 하더라도 명시적으로 권한을 부여하지 않는다면, 그 코드의 어느 부분도 사용할 수 없습니다.
## Just give me the TL;DR on what I need to protect my project.
@@ -54,9 +54,9 @@ GitHub에서 새로운 프로젝트를 만들 때, [라이선스를 추가할
## Which open source license is appropriate for my project?
-빈 슬레이트에서 시작한다면, [MIT 라이선스](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/)를 잘못 읽는 것은 어렵습니다. 짧고 이해하기 쉽기 때문에 저작권 고지를 포함하여 라이선스 사본을 보관하는 한 누구나 아무 것도 할 수 없습니다. 필요한 경우 다른 라이선스로 프로젝트를 릴리스 할 수 있습니다.
+빈 슬레이트에서 시작한다면, [MIT 라이선스](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/)를 잘못 읽는 것은 어렵습니다. MIT 라이선스는 짧고 이해하기 쉬우며, 저작권 고지를 포함하여 라이선스 사본을 보관하는 한 누구나 모든 것을 할 수 있도록 허락합니다.필요한 경우 다른 라이선스로 프로젝트를 릴리스 할 수 있습니다.
-그렇지 않으면 프로젝트에 적합한 오픈소스 라이선스를 선택하는 것이 목표에 달려 있습니다.
+그렇지 않으면 프로젝트에 적합한 오픈소스 라이선스를 선택하는 것이 목적에 달려 있습니다.
프로젝트에 **의존성**이 있을 가능성이 큽니다. 예를 들어, Node.js 프로젝트를 오픈소스로 사용하는 경우 노드 패키지 관리자(npm)의 라이브러리를 사용할 수 있습니다. 의존하는 각 라이브러리에는 자체 오픈소스 라이선스가 있습니다. 각 라이선스가 "허용"(다운스트림 라이선스의 조건없이 공용 사용, 수정 및 공유할 수 있는 권한 부여)되어 있으면, 원하는 라이선스를 사용할 수 있습니다. 일반적인 허용 라이선스에는 MIT, Apache 2.0, ISC 및 BSD가 포함됩니다.
From 95631a1c3bbabed4a8311434ea3e397d4f6f8b0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike McQuaid
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 13:48:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 056/749] CODEOWNERS: add team
Automatically request the relevant GitHub team for code review.
---
CODEOWNERS | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
create mode 100644 CODEOWNERS
diff --git a/CODEOWNERS b/CODEOWNERS
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c9bee33f7c7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/CODEOWNERS
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+* @github/communities-heart-reviewers
From 98b9c90b984afa8f2fea31131c5c1c3c73f6636e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley De Groot
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:15:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 057/749] Create nl.yml
Create the first steps for the dutch translation
---
_data/locales/nl.yml | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 _data/locales/nl.yml
diff --git a/_data/locales/nl.yml b/_data/locales/nl.yml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b47af74e9df
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_data/locales/nl.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+nl:
+ locale_name: Nederlands
+ nav:
+ about: Over
+ contribute: Bijdragen
+ index:
+ lead: Open source software wordt gemaakt door mensen zoals jij. Leer hoe u uw project start en laat groeien.
+ opensourcefriday: Het is vrijdag! Investeer een paar uur om bij te dragen aan de software die u gebruikt en waar u van houdt
+ article:
+ table_of_contents: Inhoudsopgave
+ back_to_all_guides: Terug naar het overzicht
+ related_guides: Gerelateerde gidsen
+ footer:
+ contribute:
+ heading: Bijdragen
+ description: Wilt u een suggestie doen? Deze inhoud is open source. Help ons het te verbeteren.
+ button: Bijdragen
+ subscribe:
+ heading: Blijf op de hoogte
+ description: Wees de eerste die hoort over de nieuwste open source-tips en middellen van GitHub.
+ label: Email adres
+ button: Abonneren
+ byline:
+ # [code], [love], and [github] will be replaced by octicons
+ format: "[code] met [love] van [github] en [friends]"
+ # Label for code octicon
+ code_label: code
+ # Label for love octicon
+ love_label: love
+ # Label for the contributors link
+ friends_label: friends
From 2611749a0e91da4cc3ed1659e6bd6d550d95fb75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley de Groot
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:44:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 058/749] Created /nl/
---
_articles/nl/best-practices.md | 287 ++++++++++++
_articles/nl/building-community.md | 280 +++++++++++
_articles/nl/code-of-conduct.md | 120 +++++
_articles/nl/finding-users.md | 163 +++++++
_articles/nl/getting-paid.md | 191 ++++++++
_articles/nl/how-to-contribute.md | 535 ++++++++++++++++++++++
_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md | 165 +++++++
_articles/nl/legal.md | 166 +++++++
_articles/nl/metrics.md | 132 ++++++
_articles/nl/starting-a-project.md | 362 +++++++++++++++
10 files changed, 2401 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 _articles/nl/best-practices.md
create mode 100644 _articles/nl/building-community.md
create mode 100644 _articles/nl/code-of-conduct.md
create mode 100644 _articles/nl/finding-users.md
create mode 100644 _articles/nl/getting-paid.md
create mode 100644 _articles/nl/how-to-contribute.md
create mode 100644 _articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md
create mode 100644 _articles/nl/legal.md
create mode 100644 _articles/nl/metrics.md
create mode 100644 _articles/nl/starting-a-project.md
diff --git a/_articles/nl/best-practices.md b/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a6ab4e409e3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
@@ -0,0 +1,287 @@
+---
+lang: nl
+title: Best Practices for Maintainers
+description: Making your life easier as an open source maintainer, from documenting processes to leveraging your community.
+class: best-practices
+toc:
+ what-does-it-mean-to-be-a-maintainer: "What does it mean to be a maintainer?"
+ documenting-your-processes: "Documenting your processes"
+ learning-to-say-no: "Learning to say no"
+ leverage-your-community: "Leverage your community"
+ bring-in-the-robots: "Bring in the robots"
+ its-okay-to-hit-pause: "It’s okay to hit pause"
+order: 5
+image: /assets/images/cards/best-practices.png
+related:
+ - metrics
+ - leadership
+---
+
+## What does it mean to be a maintainer?
+
+If you maintain an open source project that a lot of people use, you may have noticed you're coding less and responding to issues more.
+
+In the early stages of a project, you're experimenting with new ideas and making decisions based on what you want. As your project increases in popularity, you'll find yourself working with your users and contributors more.
+
+Maintaining a project requires more than code. These tasks are often unexpected, but they're just as important to a growing project. We've gathered a few ways to make your life easier, from documenting processes to leveraging your community.
+
+## Documenting your processes
+
+Writing things down is one of the most important things you can do as a maintainer.
+
+Documentation not only clarifies your own thinking, but it helps other people understand what you need or expect, before they even ask.
+
+Writing things down makes it easier to say no when something doesn't fit into your scope. It also makes it easier for people to pitch in and help. You never know who might be reading or using your project.
+
+Even if you don't use full paragraphs, jotting down bullet points is better than not writing at all.
+
+Remember to keep your documentation up-to-date. If you're not able to always do this, delete your outdated documentation or indicate it is outdated so contributors know updates are welcome.
+
+### Write down your project's vision
+
+Start by writing down the goals of your project. Add them to your README, or create a separate file called VISION. If there are other artifacts that could help, like a project roadmap, make those public as well.
+
+Having a clear, documented vision keeps you focused and helps you avoid "scope creep" from others' contributions.
+
+For example, @lord discovered that having a project vision helped him figure out which requests to spend time on. As a new maintainer, he regretted not sticking to his project's scope when he got his first feature request for [Slate](https://github.com/lord/slate).
+
+
+
+ I fumbled it. I didn't put in the effort to come up with a complete solution. Instead of an half-assed solution, I wish I had said "I don't have time for this right now, but I'll add it to the long term nice-to-have list."
+
+— @lord, ["Tips for new open source maintainers"](https://lord.io/blog/2014/oss-tips/)
+
+
+
+### Communicate your expectations
+
+Rules can be nerve-wracking to write down. Sometimes you might feel like you're policing other people's behavior or killing all the fun.
+
+Written and enforced fairly, however, good rules empower maintainers. They prevent you from getting dragged into doing things you don't want to do.
+
+Most people who come across your project don't know anything about you or your circumstances. They may assume you get paid to work on it, especially if it's something they regularly use and depend on. Maybe at one point you put a lot of time into your project, but now you're busy with a new job or family member.
+
+All of this is perfectly okay! Just make sure other people know about it.
+
+If maintaining your project is part-time or purely volunteered, be honest about how much time you have. This is not the same as how much time you think the project requires, or how much time others want you to spend.
+
+Here are a few rules that are worth writing down:
+
+* How a contribution is reviewed and accepted (_Do they need tests? An issue template?_)
+* The types of contributions you'll accept (_Do you only want help with a certain part of your code?_)
+* When it's appropriate to follow up (_for example, "You can expect a response from a maintainer within 7 days. If you haven't heard anything by then, feel free to ping the thread."_)
+* How much time you spend on the project (_for example, "We only spend about 5 hours per week on this project"_)
+
+[Jekyll](https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll/tree/master/docs), [CocoaPods](https://github.com/CocoaPods/CocoaPods/wiki/Communication-&-Design-Rules), and [Homebrew](https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/blob/bbed7246bc5c5b7acb8c1d427d10b43e090dfd39/docs/Maintainers-Avoiding-Burnout.md) are several examples of projects with ground rules for maintainers and contributors.
+
+### Keep communication public
+
+Don't forget to document your interactions, too. Wherever you can, keep communication about your project public. If somebody tries to contact you privately to discuss a feature request or support need, politely direct them to a public communication channel, such as a mailing list or issue tracker.
+
+If you meet with other maintainers, or make a major decision in private, document these conversations in public, even if it's just posting your notes.
+
+That way, anybody who joins your community will have access to the same information as someone who's been there for years.
+
+## Learning to say no
+
+You've written things down. Ideally, everybody would read your documentation, but in reality, you'll have to remind others that this knowledge exists.
+
+Having everything written down, however, helps depersonalize situations when you do need to enforce your rules.
+
+Saying no isn't fun, but _"Your contribution doesn't match this project's criteria"_ feels less personal than _"I don't like your contribution"_.
+
+Saying no applies to many situations you'll come across as a maintainer: feature requests that don't fit the scope, someone derailing a discussion, doing unnecessary work for others.
+
+### Keep the conversation friendly
+
+One of the most important places you'll practice saying no is on your issue and pull request queue. As a project maintainer, you'll inevitably receive suggestions that you don't want to accept.
+
+Maybe the contribution changes your project's scope or doesn't match your vision. Maybe the idea is good, but the implementation is poor.
+
+Regardless of the reason, it is possible to tactfully handle contributions that don't meet your project's standards.
+
+If you receive a contribution you don't want to accept, your first reaction might be to ignore it or pretend you didn't see it. Doing so could hurt the other person's feelings and even demotivate other potential contributors in your community.
+
+
+
+ The key to handle support for large-scale open source projects is to keep issues moving. Try to avoid having issues stall. If you're an iOS developer you know how frustrating it can be to submit radars. You might hear back 2 years later, and are told to try again with the latest version of iOS.
+
+— @KrauseFx, ["Scaling open source communities"](https://krausefx.com/blog/scaling-open-source-communities)
+
+
+
+Don't leave an unwanted contribution open because you feel guilty or want to be nice. Over time, your unanswered issues and PRs will make working on your project feel that much more stressful and intimidating.
+
+It's better to immediately close the contributions you know you don't want to accept. If your project already suffers from a large backlog, @steveklabnik has suggestions for [how to triage issues efficiently](https://words.steveklabnik.com/how-to-be-an-open-source-gardener).
+
+Secondly, ignoring contributions sends a negative signal to your community. Contributing to a project can be intimidating, especially if it's someone's first time. Even if you don't accept their contribution, acknowledge the person behind it and thank them for their interest. It's a big compliment!
+
+If you don't want to accept a contribution:
+
+* **Thank them** for their contribution
+* **Explain why it doesn't fit** into the scope of the project, and offer clear suggestions for improvement, if you're able. Be kind, but firm.
+* **Link to relevant documentation**, if you have it. If you notice repeated requests for things you don't want to accept, add them into your documentation to avoid repeating yourself.
+* **Close the request**
+
+You shouldn't need more than 1-2 sentences to respond. For example, when a user of [celery](https://github.com/celery/celery/) reported a Windows-related error, @berkerpeksag [responded with](https://github.com/celery/celery/issues/3383):
+
+![Celery screenshot](/assets/images/best-practices/celery.png)
+
+If the thought of saying no terrifies you, you're not alone. As @jessfraz [put it](https://blog.jessfraz.com/post/the-art-of-closing/):
+
+> I've talked to maintainers from several different open source projects, Mesos, Kubernetes, Chromium, and they all agree one of the hardest parts of being a maintainer is saying "No" to patches you don't want.
+
+Don't feel guilty about not wanting to accept someone's contribution. The first rule of open source, [according to](https://twitter.com/solomonstre/status/715277134978113536) @shykes: _"No is temporary, yes is forever."_ While empathizing with another person's enthusiasm is a good thing, rejecting a contribution is not the same as rejecting the person behind it.
+
+Ultimately, if a contribution isn't good enough, you're under no obligation to accept it. Be kind and responsive when people contribute to your project, but only accept changes that you truly believe will make your project better. The more often you practice saying no, the easier it becomes. Promise.
+
+### Be proactive
+
+To reduce the volume of unwanted contributions in the first place, explain your project's process for submitting and accepting contributions in your contributing guide.
+
+If you're receiving too many low-quality contributions, require that contributors do a bit of work beforehand, for example:
+
+* Fill out a issue or PR template/checklist
+* Open an issue before submitting a PR
+
+If they don't follow your rules, close the issue immediately and point to your documentation.
+
+While this approach may feel unkind at first, being proactive is actually good for both parties. It reduces the chance that someone will put in many wasted hours of work into a pull request that you aren't going to accept. And it makes your workload easier to manage.
+
+
+
+ Ideally, explain to them and in a CONTRIBUTING.md file how they can get a better indication in the future on what would or would not be accepted before they begin the work.
+
+— @MikeMcQuaid, ["Kindly Closing Pull Requests"](https://github.com/blog/2124-kindly-closing-pull-requests)
+
+
+
+Sometimes, when you say no, your potential contributor may get upset or criticize your decision. If their behavior becomes hostile, [take steps to defuse the situation](https://github.com/jonschlinkert/maintainers-guide-to-staying-positive#action-items) or even remove them from your community, if they're not willing to collaborate constructively.
+
+### Embrace mentorship
+
+Maybe someone in your community regularly submits contributions that don't meet your project's standards. It can be frustrating for both parties to repeatedly go through rejections.
+
+If you see that someone is enthusiastic about your project, but needs a bit of polish, be patient. Explain clearly in each situation why their contributions don't meet the expectations of the project. Try pointing them to an easier or less ambiguous task, like an issue marked _"good first issue,"_ to get their feet wet. If you have time, consider mentoring them through their first contribution, or find someone else in your community who might be willing to mentor them.
+
+## Leverage your community
+
+You don't have to do everything yourself. Your project's community exists for a reason! Even if you don't yet have an active contributor community, if you have a lot of users, put them to work.
+
+### Share the workload
+
+If you're looking for others to pitch in, start by asking around.
+
+One way to gain new contributors is to explicitly [label issues that are simple enough for beginners to tackle](https://help.github.com/en/articles/helping-new-contributors-find-your-project-with-labels). GitHub will then surface these issues in various places on the platform, increasing their visibility.
+
+When you see new contributors making repeated contributions, recognize their work by offering more responsibility. Document how others can grow into leadership roles if they wish.
+
+Encouraging others to [share ownership of the project](../building-community/#share-ownership-of-your-project) can greatly reduce your own workload, as @lmccart discovered on her project, [p5.js](https://github.com/processing/p5.js).
+
+
+
+ I’d been saying, "Yeah, anyone can be involved, you don’t have to have a lot of coding expertise [...]." We had people sign up to come [to an event] and that’s when I was really wondering: is this true, what I’ve been saying? There are gonna be 40 people who show up, and it’s not like I can sit with each of them...But people came together, and it just sort of worked. As soon as one person got it, they could teach their neighbor.
+
+— @lmccart, ["What Does "Open Source" Even Mean? p5.js Edition"](https://medium.com/@kenjagan/what-does-open-source-even-mean-p5-js-edition-98c02d354b39)
+
+
+
+If you need to step away from your project, either on hiatus or permanently, there's no shame in asking someone else to take over for you.
+
+If other people are enthusiastic about its direction, give them commit access or formally hand over control to someone else. If someone forked your project and is actively maintaining it elsewhere, consider linking to the fork from your original project. It's great that so many people want your project to live on!
+
+@progrium [found that](https://web.archive.org/web/20151204215958/https://progrium.com/blog/2015/12/04/leadership-guilt-and-pull-requests/) documenting the vision for his project, [Dokku](https://github.com/dokku/dokku), helped those goals live on even after he stepped away from the project:
+
+> I wrote a wiki page describing what I wanted and why I wanted it. For some reason it came as a surprise to me that the maintainers started moving the project in that direction! Did it happen exactly how I'd do it? Not always. But it still brought the project closer to what I wrote down.
+
+### Let others build the solutions they need
+
+If a potential contributor has a different opinion on what your project should do, you may want to gently encourage them to work on their own fork.
+
+Forking a project doesn't have to be a bad thing. Being able to copy and modify projects is one of the best things about open source. Encouraging your community members to work on their own fork can provide the creative outlet they need, without conflicting with your project's vision.
+
+
+
+ I cater to the 80% use case. If you are one of the unicorns, please fork my work. I won't get offended! My public projects are almost always meant to solve the most common problems; I try to make it easy to go deeper by either forking my work or extending it.
+
+— @geerlingguy, ["Why I Close PRs"](https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2016/why-i-close-prs-oss-project-maintainer-notes)
+
+
+
+The same applies to a user who really wants a solution that you simply don't have the bandwidth to build. Offering APIs and customization hooks can help others meet their own needs, without having to modify the source directly. @orta [found that](https://artsy.github.io/blog/2016/07/03/handling-big-projects/) encouraging plugins for CocoaPods led to "some of the most interesting ideas":
+
+> It's almost inevitable that once a project becomes big, maintainers have to become a lot more conservative about how they introduce new code. You become good at saying "no", but a lot of people have legitimate needs. So, instead you end up converting your tool into a platform.
+
+## Bring in the robots
+
+Just as there are tasks that other people can help you with, there are also tasks that no human should ever have to do. Robots are your friend. Use them to make your life as a maintainer easier.
+
+### Require tests and other checks to improve the quality of your code
+
+One of the most important ways you can automate your project is by adding tests.
+
+Tests help contributors feel confident that they won't break anything. They also make it easier for you to review and accept contributions quickly. The more responsive you are, the more engaged your community can be.
+
+Set up automatic tests that will run on all incoming contributions, and ensure that your tests can easily be run locally by contributors. Require that all code contributions pass your tests before they can be submitted. You'll help set a minimum standard of quality for all submissions. [Required status checks](https://help.github.com/articles/about-required-status-checks/) on GitHub can help ensure no change gets merged without your tests passing.
+
+If you add tests, make sure to explain how they work in your CONTRIBUTING file.
+
+
+
+ I believe that tests are necessary for all code that people work on. If the code was fully and perfectly correct, it wouldn't need changes – we only write code when something is wrong, whether that's "It crashes" or "It lacks such-and-such a feature". And regardless of the changes you're making, tests are essential for catching any regressions you might accidentally introduce.
+
+— @edunham, ["Rust's Community Automation"](https://edunham.net/2016/09/27/rust_s_community_automation.html)
+
+
+
+### Use tools to automate basic maintenance tasks
+
+The good news about maintaining a popular project is that other maintainers have probably faced similar issues and built a solution for it.
+
+There are a [variety of tools available](https://github.com/showcases/tools-for-open-source) to help automate some aspects of maintenance work. A few examples:
+
+* [semantic-release](https://github.com/semantic-release/semantic-release) automates your releases
+* [mention-bot](https://github.com/facebook/mention-bot) mentions potential reviewers for pull requests
+* [Danger](https://github.com/danger/danger) helps automate code review
+* [no-response](https://github.com/probot/no-response) closes issues where the author hasn't responded to a request for more information
+* [dependabot-preview](https://github.com/marketplace/dependabot-preview) checks your dependency files every day for outdated requirements and opens individual pull requests for any it finds
+
+For bug reports and other common contributions, GitHub has [Issue Templates and Pull Request Templates](https://github.com/blog/2111-issue-and-pull-request-templates), which you can create to streamline the communication you receive. @TalAter made a [Choose Your Own Adventure guide](https://www.talater.com/open-source-templates/#/) to help you write your issue and PR templates.
+
+To manage your email notifications, you can set up [email filters](https://github.com/blog/2203-email-updates-about-your-own-activity) to organize by priority.
+
+If you want to get a little more advanced, style guides and linters can standardize project contributions and make them easier to review and accept.
+
+However, if your standards are too complicated, they can increase the barriers to contribution. Make sure you're only adding enough rules to make everyone's lives easier.
+
+If you're not sure which tools to use, look at what other popular projects do, especially those in your ecosystem. For example, what does the contribution process look like for other Node modules? Using similar tools and approaches will also make your process more familiar to your target contributors.
+
+## It's okay to hit pause
+
+Open source work once brought you joy. Maybe now it's starting to make you feel avoidant or guilty.
+
+Perhaps you're feeling overwhelmed or a growing sense of dread when you think about your projects. And meanwhile, the issues and pull requests pile up.
+
+Burnout is a real and pervasive issue in open source work, especially among maintainers. As a maintainer, your happiness is a non-negotiable requirement for the survival of any open source project.
+
+Although it should go without saying, take a break! You shouldn't have to wait until you feel burned out to take a vacation. @brettcannon, a Python core developer, decided to take [a month-long vacation](https://snarky.ca/why-i-took-october-off-from-oss-volunteering/) after 14 years of volunteer OSS work.
+
+Just like any other type of work, taking regular breaks will keep you refreshed, happy, and excited about your work.
+
+
+
+ In maintaining WP-CLI, I've discovered I need to make myself happy first, and set clear boundaries on my involvement. The best balance I've found is 2-5 hours per week, as a part of my normal work schedule. This keeps my involvement a passion, and from feeling too much like work. Because I prioritize the issues I'm working on, I can make regular progress on what I think is most important.
+
+— @danielbachhuber, ["My condolences, you're now the maintainer of a popular open source project"](https://runcommand.io/2016/06/26/my-condolences-youre-now-the-maintainer-of-a-popular-open-source-project/)
+
+
+
+Sometimes, it can be hard to take a break from open source work when it feels like everybody needs you. People may even try to make you feel guilty for stepping away.
+
+Do your best to find support for your users and community while you're away from a project. If you can't find the support you need, take a break anyway. Be sure to communicate when you're not available, so people aren't confused by your lack of responsiveness.
+
+Taking breaks applies to more than just vacations, too. If you don't want to do open source work on weekends, or during work hours, communicate those expectations to others, so they know not to bother you.
+
+## Take care of yourself first!
+
+Maintaining a popular project requires different skills than the earlier stages of growth, but it's no less rewarding. As a maintainer, you'll practice leadership and personal skills on a level that few people get to experience. While it's not always easy to manage, setting clear boundaries and only taking on what you're comfortable with will help you stay happy, refreshed, and productive.
diff --git a/_articles/nl/building-community.md b/_articles/nl/building-community.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..73e5cba0ffb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_articles/nl/building-community.md
@@ -0,0 +1,280 @@
+---
+lang: nl
+title: Building Welcoming Communities
+description: Building a community that encourages people to use, contribute to, and evangelize your project.
+class: building
+toc:
+ setting-your-project-up-for-success: "Setting your project up for success"
+ growing-your-community: "Growing your community"
+ resolving-conflicts: "Resolving conflicts"
+order: 4
+image: /assets/images/cards/building.png
+related:
+ - best-practices
+ - coc
+---
+
+## Setting your project up for success
+
+You've launched your project, you're spreading the word, and people are checking it out. Awesome! Now, how do you get them to stick around?
+
+A welcoming community is an investment into your project's future and reputation. If your project is just starting to see its first contributions, start by giving early contributors a positive experience, and make it easy for them to keep coming back.
+
+### Make people feel welcome
+
+One way to think about your project's community is through what @MikeMcQuaid calls the [contributor funnel](https://mikemcquaid.com/2018/08/14/the-open-source-contributor-funnel-why-people-dont-contribute-to-your-open-source-project/):
+
+![Contributor funnel](/assets/images/building-community/contributor_funnel_mikemcquaid.png)
+
+As you build your community, consider how someone at the top of the funnel (a potential user) might theoretically make their way to the bottom (an active maintainer). Your goal is to reduce friction at each stage of the contributor experience. When people have easy wins, they will feel incentivized to do more.
+
+Start with your documentation:
+
+* **Make it easy for someone to use your project.** [A friendly README](../starting-a-project/#writing-a-readme) and clear code examples will make it easier for anyone who lands on your project to get started.
+* **Clearly explain how to contribute**, using [your CONTRIBUTING file](../starting-a-project/#writing-your-contributing-guidelines) and keeping your issues up-to-date.
+* **Good first issues**: To help new contributors get started, consider explicitly [labeling issues that are simple enough for beginners to tackle](https://help.github.com/en/articles/helping-new-contributors-find-your-project-with-labels). GitHub will then surface these issues in various places on the platform, increasing useful contributions, and reducing friction from users tackling issues that are too hard for their level.
+
+[GitHub's 2017 Open Source Survey](http://opensourcesurvey.org/2017/) showed incomplete or confusing documentation is the biggest problem for open source users. Good documentation invites people to interact with your project. Eventually, someone will open an issue or pull request. Use these interactions as opportunities to move them down the funnel.
+
+* **When someone new lands on your project, thank them for their interest!** It only takes one negative experience to make someone not want to come back.
+* **Be responsive.** If you don't respond to their issue for a month, chances are, they've already forgotten about your project.
+* **Be open-minded about the types of contributions you'll accept.** Many contributors start with a bug report or small fix. There are [many ways to contribute](../how-to-contribute/#what-it-means-to-contribute) to a project. Let people help how they want to help.
+* **If there's a contribution you disagree with,** thank them for their idea and [explain why](../best-practices/#learning-to-say-no) it doesn't fit into the scope of the project, linking to relevant documentation if you have it.
+
+
+
+ Contributing to open source is easier for some than others. There's a lot of fear of being yelled at for not doing something right or just not fitting in. (...) By giving contributors a place to contribute with very low technical proficiency (documentation, web content markdown, etc) you can greatly reduce those concerns.
+
+— @mikeal, ["Growing a contributor base in modern open source"](https://opensource.com/life/16/5/growing-contributor-base-modern-open-source)
+
+
+
+The majority of open source contributors are "casual contributors": people who contribute to a project only occasionally. A casual contributor may not have time to get fully up to speed with your project, so your job is to make it easy for them to contribute.
+
+Encouraging other contributors is an investment in yourself, too. When you empower your biggest fans to run with the work they're excited about, there's less pressure to do everything yourself.
+
+### Document everything
+
+
+
+ Have you ever been to a (tech-) event where you didn't know anyone, but everyone else seemed to stand in groups and chat like old friends? (...) Now imagine you want to contribute to an open source project, but you don't see why or how this is happening.
+
+— @janl, ["Sustainable Open Source"](https://writing.jan.io/2015/11/20/sustainable-open-source.html)
+
+
+
+When you start a new project, it may feel natural to keep your work private. But open source projects thrive when you document your process in public.
+
+When you write things down, more people can participate at every step of the way. You might get help on something you didn't even know you needed.
+
+Writing things down means more than just technical documentation. Any time you feel the urge to write something down or privately discuss your project, ask yourself whether you can make it public.
+
+Be transparent about your project's roadmap, the types of contributions you're looking for, how contributions are reviewed, or why you made certain decisions.
+
+If you notice multiple users running into the same problem, document the answers in the README.
+
+For meetings, consider publishing your notes or takeaways in a relevant issue. The feedback you'll get from this level of transparency may surprise you.
+
+Documenting everything applies to the work you do, too. If you're working on a substantial update to your project, put it into a pull request and mark it as a work in progress (WIP). That way, other people can feel involved in the process early on.
+
+### Be responsive
+
+As you [promote your project](../finding-users), people will have feedback for you. They may have questions about how things work, or need help getting started.
+
+Try to be responsive when someone files an issue, submits a pull request, or asks a question about your project. When you respond quickly, people will feel they are part of a dialogue, and they'll be more enthusiastic about participating.
+
+Even if you can't review the request immediately, acknowledging it early helps increase engagement. Here's how @tdreyno responded to a pull request on [Middleman](https://github.com/middleman/middleman/pull/1466):
+
+![Middleman pull request](/assets/images/building-community/middleman_pr.png)
+
+[A Mozilla study found that](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1hsJLv1ieSqtXBzd5YZusY-mB8e1VJzaeOmh8Q4VeMio/edit#slide=id.g43d857af8_0177) contributors who received code reviews within 48 hours had a much higher rate of return and repeat contribution.
+
+Conversations about your project could also be happening in other places around the internet, such as Stack Overflow, Twitter, or Reddit. You can set up notifications in some of these places so you are alerted when someone mentions your project.
+
+### Give your community a place to congregate
+
+There are two reasons to give your community a place to congregate.
+
+The first reason is for them. Help people get to know each other. People with common interests will inevitably want a place to talk about it. And when communication is public and accessible, anybody can read past archives to get up to speed and participate.
+
+The second reason is for you. If you don't give people a public place to talk about your project, they will likely contact you directly. In the beginning, it may seem easy enough to respond to private messages "just this once". But over time, especially if your project becomes popular, you will feel exhausted. Resist the temptation to communicate with people about your project in private. Instead, direct them to a designated public channel.
+
+Public communication can be as simple as directing people to open an issue instead of emailing you directly or commenting on your blog. You could also set up a mailing list, or create a Twitter account, Slack, or IRC channel for people to talk about your project. Or try all of the above!
+
+[Kubernetes kops](https://github.com/kubernetes/kops#getting-involved) sets aside office hours every other week to help community members:
+
+> Kops also has time set aside every other week to offer help and guidance to the community. Kops maintainers have agreed to set aside time specifically dedicated to working with newcomers, helping with PRs, and discussing new features.
+
+Notable exceptions to public communication are: 1) security issues and 2) sensitive code of conduct violations. You should always have a way for people to report these issues privately. If you don't want to use your personal email, set up a dedicated email address.
+
+## Growing your community
+
+Communities are extremely powerful. That power can be a blessing or a curse, depending on how you wield it. As your project's community grows, there are ways to help it become a force of construction, not destruction.
+
+### Don't tolerate bad actors
+
+Any popular project will inevitably attract people who harm, rather than help, your community. They may start unnecessary debates, quibble over trivial features, or bully others.
+
+Do your best to adopt a zero-tolerance policy towards these types of people. If left unchecked, negative people will make other people in your community uncomfortable. They may even leave.
+
+
+
+ The truth is that having a supportive community is key. I'd never be able to do this work without the help of my colleagues, friendly internet strangers, and chatty IRC channels. (...) Don't settle for less. Don't settle for assholes.
+
+— @okdistribute, ["How to Run a FOSS Project"](https://okdistribute.xyz/post/okf-de)
+
+
+
+Regular debates over trivial aspects of your project distracts others, including you, from focusing on important tasks. New people who arrive to your project may see these conversations and not want to participate.
+
+When you see negative behavior happening on your project, call it out publicly. Explain, in a kind but firm tone, why their behavior is not acceptable. If the problem persists, you may need to [ask them to leave](../code-of-conduct/#enforcing-your-code-of-conduct). Your [code of conduct](../code-of-conduct/) can be a constructive guide for these conversations.
+
+### Meet contributors where they're at
+
+Good documentation only becomes more important as your community grows. Casual contributors, who may not otherwise be familiar with your project, read your documentation to quickly get the context they need.
+
+In your CONTRIBUTING file, explicitly tell new contributors how to get started. You may even want to make a dedicated section for this purpose. [Django](https://github.com/django/django), for example, has a special landing page to welcome new contributors.
+
+![Django new contributors page](/assets/images/building-community/django_new_contributors.png)
+
+In your issue queue, label bugs that are suitable for different types of contributors: for example, [_"first timers only"_](https://kentcdodds.com/blog/first-timers-only), _"good first issue"_, or _"documentation"_. [These labels](https://github.com/librariesio/libraries.io/blob/6afea1a3354aef4672d9b3a9fc4cc308d60020c8/app/models/github_issue.rb#L8-L14) make it easy for someone new to your project to quickly scan your issues and get started.
+
+Finally, use your documentation to make people feel welcome at every step of the way.
+
+You will never interact with most people who land on your project. There may be contributions you didn't receive because somebody felt intimidated or didn't know where to get started. Even a few kind words can keep someone from leaving your project in frustration.
+
+For example, here's how [Rubinius](https://github.com/rubinius/rubinius/) starts [its contributing guide](https://github.com/rubinius/rubinius/blob/HEAD/.github/contributing.md):
+
+> We want to start off by saying thank you for using Rubinius. This project is a labor of love, and we appreciate all of the users that catch bugs, make performance improvements, and help with documentation. Every contribution is meaningful, so thank you for participating. That being said, here are a few guidelines that we ask you to follow so we can successfully address your issue.
+
+### Share ownership of your project
+
+
+
+ Your leaders will have different opinions, as all healthy communities should! However, you need to take steps to ensure the loudest voice doesn't always win by tiring people out, and that less prominent and minority voices are heard.
+
+— @sagesharp, ["What makes a good community?"](https://sage.thesharps.us/2015/10/06/what-makes-a-good-community/)
+
+
+
+People are excited to contribute to projects when they feel a sense of ownership. That doesn't mean you need to turn over your project's vision or accept contributions you don't want. But the more you give credit to others, the more they'll stick around.
+
+See if you can find ways to share ownership with your community as much as possible. Here are some ideas:
+
+* **Resist fixing easy (non-critical) bugs.** Instead, use them as opportunities to recruit new contributors, or mentor someone who'd like to contribute. It may seem unnatural at first, but your investment will pay off over time. For example, @michaeljoseph asked a contributor to submit a pull request on a [Cookiecutter](https://github.com/audreyr/cookiecutter) issue below, rather than fix it himself.
+
+![Cookiecutter issue](/assets/images/building-community/cookiecutter_submit_pr.png)
+
+* **Start a CONTRIBUTORS or AUTHORS file in your project** that lists everyone who's contributed to your project, like [Sinatra](https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/blob/HEAD/AUTHORS.md) does.
+
+* If you've got a sizable community, **send out a newsletter or write a blog post** thanking contributors. Rust's [This Week in Rust](https://this-week-in-rust.org/) and Hoodie's [Shoutouts](http://hood.ie/blog/shoutouts-week-24.html) are two good examples.
+
+* **Give every contributor commit access.** @felixge found that this made people [more excited to polish their patches](https://felixge.de/2013/03/11/the-pull-request-hack.html), and he even found new maintainers for projects that he hadn't worked on in awhile.
+
+* If your project is on GitHub, **move your project from your personal account to an [Organization](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-new-organization-account/)** and add at least one backup admin. Organizations make it easier to work on projects with external collaborators.
+
+The reality is that [most projects only have](https://peerj.com/preprints/1233.pdf) one or two maintainers who do most of the work. The bigger your project, and the bigger your community, the easier it is to find help.
+
+While you may not always find someone to answer the call, putting a signal out there increases the chances that other people will pitch in. And the earlier you start, the sooner people can help.
+
+
+
+ \[It's in your\] best interest to recruit contributors who enjoy and who are capable of doing the things that you are not. Do you enjoy coding, but not answering issues? Then identify those individuals in your community who do and let them have it.
+
+— @gr2m, ["Welcoming Communities"](http://hood.ie/blog/welcoming-communities.html)
+
+
+
+## Resolving conflicts
+
+In the early stages of your project, making major decisions is easy. When you want to do something, you just do it.
+
+As your project becomes more popular, more people will take interest in the decisions you make. Even if you don't have a big community of contributors, if your project has a lot of users, you'll find people weighing in on decisions or raising issues of their own.
+
+For the most part, if you've cultivated a friendly, respectful community and documented your processes openly, your community should be able to find resolution. But sometimes you run into an issue that's a bit harder to address.
+
+### Set the bar for kindness
+
+When your community is grappling with a difficult issue, tempers may rise. People may become angry or frustrated and take it out on one another, or on you.
+
+Your job as a maintainer is to keep these situations from escalating. Even if you have a strong opinion on the topic, try to take the position of a moderator or facilitator, rather than jumping into the fight and pushing your views. If someone is being unkind or monopolizing the conversation, [act immediately](../building-community/#dont-tolerate-bad-actors) to keep discussions civil and productive.
+
+
+
+ As a project maintainer, it's extremely important to be respectful to your contributors. They often take what you say very personally.
+
+— @kennethreitz, ["Be Cordial or Be on Your Way"](https://www.kennethreitz.org/essays/be-cordial-or-be-on-your-way)
+
+
+
+Other people are looking to you for guidance. Set a good example. You can still express disappointment, unhappiness, or concern, but do so calmly.
+
+Keeping your cool isn't easy, but demonstrating leadership improves the health of your community. The internet thanks you.
+
+### Treat your README as a constitution
+
+Your README is [more than just a set of instructions](../starting-a-project/#writing-a-readme). It's also a place to talk about your goals, product vision, and roadmap. If people are overly focused on debating the merit of a particular feature, it may help to revisit your README and talk about the higher vision of your project. Focusing on your README also depersonalizes the conversation, so you can have a constructive discussion.
+
+### Focus on the journey, not the destination
+
+Some projects use a voting process to make major decisions. While sensible at first glance, voting emphasizes getting to an "answer," rather than listening to and addressing each other's concerns.
+
+Voting can become political, where community members feel pressured to do each other favors or vote a certain way. Not everybody votes, either, whether it's the [silent majority](https://ben.balter.com/2016/03/08/optimizing-for-power-users-and-edge-cases/#the-silent-majority-of-users) in your community, or current users who didn't know a vote was taking place.
+
+Sometimes, voting is a necessary tiebreaker. As much as you are able, however, emphasize ["consensus seeking"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus-seeking_decision-making) rather than consensus.
+
+Under a consensus seeking process, community members discuss major concerns until they feel they have been adequately heard. When only minor concerns remain, the community moves forward. "Consensus seeking" acknowledges that a community may not be able to reach a perfect answer. Instead, it prioritizes listening and discussion.
+
+
+
+ Part of the reason why a voting system doesn't exist for Atom Issues is because the Atom team isn't going to follow a voting system in all cases. Sometimes we have to choose what we feel is right even if it is unpopular. (...) What I can offer and pledge to do...is that it is my job to listen to the community.
+
+— @lee-dohm on [Atom's decisionmaking process](https://discuss.atom.io/t/prioritize-issues-feature-requests-based-on-voting-system/27642/2)
+
+
+
+Even if you don't actually adopt a consensus seeking process, as a project maintainer, it's important that people know you are listening. Making other people feel heard, and committing to resolving their concerns, goes a long way to diffuse sensitive situations. Then, follow up on your words with actions.
+
+Don't rush into a decision for the sake of having a resolution. Make sure that everybody feels heard and that all information has been made public before moving toward a resolution.
+
+### Keep the conversation focused on action
+
+Discussion is important, but there is a difference between productive and unproductive conversations.
+
+Encourage discussion so long as it is actively moving towards resolution. If it's clear that conversation is languishing or going off-topic, jabs are getting personal, or people are quibbling about minor details, it's time to shut it down.
+
+Allowing these conversations to continue is not only bad for the issue at hand, but bad for the health of your community. It sends a message that these types of conversations are permitted or even encouraged, and it can discourage people from raising or resolving future issues.
+
+With every point made by you or by others, ask yourself, _"How does this bring us closer to a resolution?"_
+
+If the conversation is starting to unravel, ask the group, _"Which steps should we take next?"_ to refocus the conversation.
+
+If a conversation clearly isn't going anywhere, there are no clear actions to be taken, or the appropriate action has already been taken, close the issue and explain why you closed it.
+
+
+
+ Guiding a thread toward usefulness without being pushy is an art. It won't work to simply admonish people to stop wasting their time, or to ask them not to post unless they have something constructive to say. (...) Instead, you have to suggest conditions for further progress: give people a route, a path to follow that leads to the results you want, yet without sounding like you're dictating conduct.
+
+— @kfogel, [_Producing OSS_](https://producingoss.com/en/producingoss.html#common-pitfalls)
+
+
+
+### Pick your battles wisely
+
+Context is important. Consider who is involved in the discussion and how they represent the rest of the community.
+
+Is everybody in the community upset about, or even engaged with, this issue? Or is a lone troublemaker? Don't forget to consider your silent community members, not just the active voices.
+
+If the issue does not represent the broader needs of your community, you may just need to acknowledge the concerns of a few people. If this is a recurring issue without a clear resolution, point them to previous discussions on the topic and close the thread.
+
+### Identify a community tiebreaker
+
+With a good attitude and clear communication, most difficult situations are resolvable. However, even in a productive conversation, there can simply be a difference in opinion on how to proceed. In these cases, identify an individual or group of people that can serve as a tiebreaker.
+
+A tiebreaker could be the primary maintainer of the project, or it could be a small group of people who make a decision based on voting. Ideally, you've identified a tiebreaker and the associated process in a GOVERNANCE file before you ever have to use it.
+
+Your tiebreaker should be a last resort. Divisive issues are an opportunity for your community to grow and learn. Embrace these opportunities and use a collaborative process to move to a resolution wherever possible.
+
+## Community is the ❤️ of open source
+
+Healthy, thriving communities fuel the thousands of hours poured into open source every week. Many contributors point to other people as the reason for working - or not working - on open source. By learning how to tap into that power constructively, you'll help someone out there have an unforgettable open source experience.
diff --git a/_articles/nl/code-of-conduct.md b/_articles/nl/code-of-conduct.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e70bd41632e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_articles/nl/code-of-conduct.md
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+---
+lang: nl
+title: Your Code of Conduct
+description: Facilitate healthy and constructive community behavior by adopting and enforcing a code of conduct.
+class: coc
+toc:
+ why-do-i-need-a-code-of-conduct: "Why do I need a code of conduct?"
+ establishing-a-code-of-conduct: "Establishing a code of conduct"
+ deciding-how-youll-enforce-your-code-of-conduct: "Deciding how you’ll enforce your code of conduct"
+ enforcing-your-code-of-conduct: "Enforcing your code of conduct"
+ your-responsibilities-as-a-maintainer: "Your responsibilities as a maintainer"
+order: 8
+image: /assets/images/cards/coc.png
+related:
+ - building
+ - leadership
+---
+
+## Why do I need a code of conduct?
+
+A code of conduct is a document that establishes expectations for behavior for your project's participants. Adopting, and enforcing, a code of conduct can help create a positive social atmosphere for your community.
+
+Codes of conduct help protect not just your participants, but yourself. If you maintain a project, you may find that unproductive attitudes from other participants can make you feel drained or unhappy about your work over time.
+
+A code of conduct empowers you to facilitate healthy, constructive community behavior. Being proactive reduces the likelihood that you, or others, will become fatigued with your project, and helps you take action when someone does something you don't agree with.
+
+## Establishing a code of conduct
+
+Try to establish a code of conduct as early as possible: ideally, when you first create your project.
+
+In addition to communicating your expectations, a code of conduct describes the following:
+
+* Where the code of conduct takes effect _(only on issues and pull requests, or community activities like events?)_
+* Whom the code of conduct applies to _(community members and maintainers, but what about sponsors?)_
+* What happens if someone violates the code of conduct
+* How someone can report violations
+
+Wherever you can, use prior art. The [Contributor Covenant](https://contributor-covenant.org/) is a drop-in code of conduct that is used by over 40,000 open source projects, including Kubernetes, Rails, and Swift.
+
+The [Django Code of Conduct](https://www.djangoproject.com/conduct/) and the [Citizen Code of Conduct](http://citizencodeofconduct.org/) are also two good code of conduct examples.
+
+Place a CODE_OF_CONDUCT file in your project's root directory, and make it visible to your community by linking it from your CONTRIBUTING or README file.
+
+## Deciding how you'll enforce your code of conduct
+
+
+ A code of conduct that isn't (or can't be) enforced is worse than no code of conduct at all: it sends the message that the values in the code of conduct aren't actually important or respected in your community.
+
+— [Ada Initiative](https://adainitiative.org/2014/02/18/howto-design-a-code-of-conduct-for-your-community/)
+
+
+
+You should explain how your code of conduct will be enforced **_before_** a violation occurs. There are several reasons to do so:
+
+* It demonstrates that you are serious about taking action when it's needed.
+
+* Your community will feel more reassured that complaints actually get reviewed.
+
+* You'll reassure your community that the review process is fair and transparent, should they ever find themselves investigated for a violation.
+
+You should give people a private way (such as an email address) to report a code of conduct violation and explain who receives that report. It could be a maintainer, a group of maintainers, or a code of conduct working group.
+
+Don't forget that someone might want to report a violation about a person who receives those reports. In this case, give them an option to report violations to someone else. For example, @ctb and @mr-c [explain on their project](https://github.com/dib-lab/khmer/blob/HEAD/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.rst), [khmer](https://github.com/dib-lab/khmer):
+
+> Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be reported by emailing **khmer-project@idyll.org** which only goes to C. Titus Brown and Michael R. Crusoe. To report an issue involving either of them please email **Judi Brown Clarke, Ph.D.** the Diversity Director at the BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, an NSF Center for Science and Technology.*
+
+For inspiration, check out Django's [enforcement manual](https://www.djangoproject.com/conduct/enforcement-manual/) (though you may not need something this comprehensive, depending on the size of your project).
+
+## Enforcing your code of conduct
+
+Sometimes, despite your best efforts, somebody will do something that violates this code. There are several ways to address negative or harmful behavior when it comes up.
+
+### Gather information about the situation
+
+Treat each community member's voice as important as your own. If you receive a report that someone violated the code of conduct, take it seriously and investigate the matter, even if it does not match your own experience with that person. Doing so signals to your community that you value their perspective and trust their judgment.
+
+The community member in question may be a repeat offender who consistently makes others feel uncomfortable, or they may have only said or done something once. Both can be grounds for taking action, depending on context.
+
+Before you respond, give yourself time to understand what happened. Read through the person's past comments and conversations to better understand who they are and why they might have acted in such a way. Try to gather perspectives other than your own about this person and their behavior.
+
+
+ Don’t get pulled into an argument. Don’t get sidetracked into dealing with someone else’s behavior before you’ve finished dealing with the matter at hand. Focus on what you need.
+
+— Stephanie Zvan, ["So You've Got Yourself a Policy. Now What?"](https://the-orbit.net/almostdiamonds/2014/04/10/so-youve-got-yourself-a-policy-now-what/)
+
+
+
+### Take appropriate action
+
+After gathering and processing sufficient information, you'll need to decide what to do. As you consider your next steps, remember that your goal as a moderator is to foster a safe, respectful, and collaborative environment. Consider not only how to deal with the situation in question, but how your response will affect the rest of your community's behavior and expectations moving forward.
+
+When somebody reports a code of conduct violation, it is your, not their, job to handle it. Sometimes, the reporter is disclosing information at great risk to their career, reputation, or physical safety. Forcing them to confront their harasser could put the reporter in a compromising position. You should handle direct communication with the person in question, unless the reporter explicitly requests otherwise.
+
+There are a few ways you might respond to a code of conduct violation:
+
+* **Give the person in question a public warning** and explain how their behavior negatively impacted others, preferably in the channel where it occurred. Where possible, public communication conveys to the rest of the community that you take the code of conduct seriously. Be kind, but firm in your communication.
+
+* **Privately reach out to the person** in question to explain how their behavior negatively impacted others. You may want to use a private communication channel if the situation involves sensitive personal information. If you communicate with someone privately, it's a good idea to CC those who first reported the situation, so they know you took action. Ask the reporting person for consent before CCing them.
+
+Sometimes, a resolution cannot be reached. The person in question may become aggressive or hostile when confronted or does not change their behavior. In this situation, you may want to consider taking stronger action. For example:
+
+* **Suspend the person** in question from the project, enforced through a temporary ban on participating in any aspect of the project
+
+* **Permanently ban** the person from the project
+
+Banning members should not be taken lightly and represents a permanent and irreconcilable difference of perspectives. You should only take these measures when it is clear that a resolution cannot be reached.
+
+## Your responsibilities as a maintainer
+
+A code of conduct is not a law that is enforced arbitrarily. You are the enforcer of the code of conduct and it's your responsibility to follow the rules that the code of conduct establishes.
+
+As a maintainer you establish the guidelines for your community and enforce those guidelines according to the rules set forth in your code of conduct. This means taking any report of a code of conduct violation seriously. The reporter is owed a thorough and fair review of their complaint. If you determine that the behavior that they reported is not a violation, communicate that clearly to them and explain why you're not going to take action on it. What they do with that is up to them: tolerate the behavior that they had an issue with, or stop participating in the community.
+
+A report of behavior that doesn't _technically_ violate the code of conduct may still indicate that there is a problem in your community, and you should investigate this potential problem and act accordingly. This may include revising your code of conduct to clarify acceptable behavior and/or talking to the person whose behavior was reported and telling them that while they did not violate the code of conduct, they are skirting the edge of what is expected and are making certain participants feel uncomfortable.
+
+In the end, as a maintainer, you set and enforce the standards for acceptable behavior. You have the ability to shape the community values of the project, and participants expect you to enforce those values in a fair and even-handed way.
+
+## Encourage the behavior you want to see in the world 🌎
+
+When a project seems hostile or unwelcoming, even if it's just one person whose behavior is tolerated by others, you risk losing many more contributors, some of whom you may never even meet. It's not always easy to adopt or enforce a code of conduct, but fostering a welcoming environment will help your community grow.
diff --git a/_articles/nl/finding-users.md b/_articles/nl/finding-users.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1d1cd099656
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_articles/nl/finding-users.md
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+---
+lang: nl
+title: Finding Users for Your Project
+description: Help your open source project grow by getting it in the hands of happy users.
+class: finding
+toc:
+ spreading-the-word: "Spreading the word"
+ figure-out-your-message: "Figure out your message"
+ help-people-find-and-follow-your-project: "Help people find and follow your project"
+ go-where-your-projects-audience-is-online: "Go where your project’s audience is (online)"
+ go-where-your-projects-audience-is-offline: "Go where your project’s audience is (offline)"
+ build-a-reputation: "Build a reputation"
+order: 3
+image: /assets/images/cards/finding.png
+related:
+ - beginners
+ - building
+---
+
+## Spreading the word
+
+There's no rule that says you have to promote an open source project when you launch. There are many fulfilling reasons to work in open source that have nothing to do with popularity. Instead of hoping others will find and use your open source project, you have to spread the word about your hard work!
+
+## Figure out your message
+
+Before you start the actual work of promoting your project, you should be able to explain what it does, and why it matters.
+
+What makes your project different or interesting? Why did you create it? Answering these questions for yourself will help you communicate your project's significance.
+
+Remember that people get involved as users, and eventually become contributors, because your project solves a problem for them. As you think about your project's message and value, try to view them through the lens of what _users and contributors_ might want.
+
+For example, @robb uses code examples to clearly communicate why his project, [Cartography](https://github.com/robb/Cartography), is useful:
+
+![Cartography README](/assets/images/finding-users/cartography.jpg)
+
+For a deeper dive into messaging, check out Mozilla's ["Personas and Pathways"](https://mozillascience.github.io/working-open-workshop/personas_pathways/) exercise for developing user personas.
+
+## Help people find and follow your project
+
+
+ You ideally need a single "home" URL that you can promote and point people to in relation to your project. You don't need to splash out on a fancy template or even a domain name, but your project needs a focal point.
+
+— Peter Cooper & Robert Nyman, ["How to Spread the Word About Your Code"](https://hacks.mozilla.org/2013/05/how-to-spread-the-word-about-your-code/)
+
+
+
+Help people find and remember your project by pointing them to a single namespace.
+
+**Have a clear handle to promote your work.** A Twitter handle, GitHub URL, or IRC channel is an easy way to point people to your project. These outlets also give your project's growing community a place to convene.
+
+If you don't wish to set up outlets for your project yet, promote your own Twitter or GitHub handle in everything you do. Promoting your Twitter or GitHub handle will let people know how to contact you or follow your work. If you speak at a meetup or event, make sure that your contact information is included in your bio or slides.
+
+
+
+ A mistake I made in those early days (...) was not starting a Twitter account for the project. Twitter's a great way to keep people up to date about a project as well as constantly expose people to the project.
+
+— @nathanmarz, ["History of Apache Storm and Lessons Learned"](http://nathanmarz.com/blog/history-of-apache-storm-and-lessons-learned.html)
+
+
+
+**Consider creating a website for your project.** A website makes your project friendlier and easier to navigate, especially when it's paired with clear documentation and tutorials. Having a website also suggests that your project is active which will make your audience feel more comfortable using it. Provide examples to give people ideas for how to use your project.
+
+[@adrianholovaty](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7531689), co-creator of Django, said that a website was _"by far the best thing we did with Django in the early days"_.
+
+If your project is hosted on GitHub, you can use [GitHub Pages](https://pages.github.com/) to easily make a website. [Yeoman](http://yeoman.io/), [Vagrant](https://www.vagrantup.com/), and [Middleman](https://middlemanapp.com/) are [a few examples](https://github.com/showcases/github-pages-examples) of excellent, comprehensive websites.
+
+![Vagrant homepage](/assets/images/finding-users/vagrant_homepage.png)
+
+Now that you have a message for your project, and an easy way for people to find your project, let's get out there and talk to your audience!
+
+## Go where your project's audience is (online)
+
+Online outreach is a great way to share and spread the word quickly. Using online channels, you have the potential to reach a very wide audience.
+
+Take advantage of existing online communities and platforms to reach your audience. If your open source project is a software project, you can probably find your audience on [Stack Overflow](https://stackoverflow.com/), [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com), [Hacker News](https://news.ycombinator.com/), or [Quora](https://www.quora.com/). Find the channels where you think people will most benefit from or be excited about your work.
+
+
+
+ Each program has very specific functions that only a fraction of users will find useful. Don't spam as many people as possible. Instead, target your efforts to communities that will benefit from knowing about your project.
+
+— @pazdera, ["Marketing for open source projects"](https://radek.io/2015/09/28/marketing-for-open-source-projects-3/)
+
+
+
+See if you can find ways to share your project in relevant ways:
+
+* **Get to know relevant open source projects and communities.** Sometimes, you don't have to directly promote your project. If your project is perfect for data scientists who use Python, get to know the Python data science community. As people get to know you, natural opportunities will arise to talk about and share your work.
+* **Find people experiencing the problem that your project solves.** Search through related forums for people who fall into your project's target audience. Answer their question and find a tactful way, when appropriate, to suggest your project as a solution.
+* **Ask for feedback.** Introduce yourself and your work to an audience that would find it relevant and interesting. Be specific about who you think would benefit from your project. Try to finish the sentence: _"I think my project would really help X, who are trying to do Y_". Listen and respond to others' feedback, rather than simply promoting your work.
+
+Generally speaking, focus on helping others before asking for things in return. Because anyone can easily promote a project online, there will be a lot of noise. To stand out from the crowd, give people context for who you are and not just what you want.
+
+If nobody pays attention or responds to your initial outreach, don't get discouraged! Most project launches are an iterative process that can take months or years. If you don't get a response the first time, try a different tactic, or look for ways to add value to others' work first. Promoting and launching your project takes time and dedication.
+
+## Go where your project's audience is (offline)
+
+![Public speaking](/assets/images/finding-users/public_speaking.jpg)
+
+Offline events are a popular way to promote new projects to audiences. They're a great way to reach an engaged audience and build deeper human connections, especially if you are interested in reaching developers.
+
+If you're [new to public speaking](https://speaking.io/), start by finding a local meetup that's related to the language or ecosystem of your project.
+
+
+
+ I was pretty nervous about going to PyCon. I was giving a talk, I was only going to know a couple of people there, I was going for an entire week. (...) I shouldn't have worried, though. PyCon was phenomenally awesome! (...) Everyone was incredibly friendly and outgoing, so much that I rarely found time not to talk to people!
+
+— @jhamrick, ["How I learned to Stop Worrying and Love PyCon"](http://www.jesshamrick.com/2014/04/18/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-pycon/)
+
+
+
+If you've never spoken at an event before, it's perfectly normal to feel nervous! Remember that your audience is there because they genuinely want to hear about your work.
+
+As you write your talk, focus on what your audience will find interesting and get value out of. Keep your language friendly and approachable. Smile, breathe, and have fun.
+
+
+
+ When you start writing your talk, no matter what your topic is, it can help if you see your talk as a story that you tell people.
+
+— Lena Reinhard, ["How to Prepare and Write a Tech Conference Talk"](http://wunder.schoenaberselten.com/2016/02/16/how-to-prepare-and-write-a-tech-conference-talk/)
+
+
+
+When you feel ready, consider speaking at a conference to promote your project. Conferences can help you reach more people, sometimes from all over the world.
+
+Look for conferences that are specific to your language or ecosystem. Before you submit your talk, research the conference to tailor your talk for attendees and increase your chances of being accepted to speak at the conference. You can often get a sense of your audience by looking at a conference's speakers.
+
+
+
+ I wrote very nicely to the JSConf people and begged them to give me a slot where I could present it at JSConf EU. (...) I was extremely scared, presenting this thing that I had been working on for six months. (...) The whole time I was just thinking, oh my God. What am I doing here?
+
+— @ry, ["History of Node.js" (video)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAc0vQCC6UQ&t=24m57s)
+
+
+
+## Build a reputation
+
+In addition to the strategies outlined above, the best way to invite people to share and contribute to your project is to share and contribute to their projects.
+
+Helping newcomers, sharing resources, and making thoughtful contributions to others' projects will help you build a positive reputation. Being an active member in the open source community will help people have context for your work and be more likely to pay attention to and share your project. Developing relationships with other open source projects can even lead to official partnerships.
+
+
+
+ The only reason urllib3 is the most popular third-party Python library today is because it's part of requests.
+
+— @shazow, ["How to make your open source project thrive"](https://about.sourcegraph.com/blog/how-to-make-your-open-source-project-thrive-with-andrey-petrov/)
+
+
+
+It's never too early, or too late, to start building your reputation. Even if you've launched your own project already, continue to look for ways to help others.
+
+There is no overnight solution to building an audience. Gaining the trust and respect of others takes time, and building your reputation never ends.
+
+
+
+ PhantomJS was released for the first time in the beginning of 2011. (...) I spread the word in the usual ways: I tweeted about it, I wrote blog posts on things you could do with it, I mentioned it during various discussions in meetups. When it became more well known in 2014, I started giving presentations about it.
+
+— @ariya, ["Maintainer Stories"](https://github.com/open-source/stories/ariya)
+
+
+
+## Keep at it!
+
+It may take a long time before people notice your open source project. That's okay! Some of the most popular projects today took years to reach high levels of activity. Focus on building relationships instead of hoping that your project will spontaneously gain popularity. Be patient, and keep sharing your work with those who appreciate it.
diff --git a/_articles/nl/getting-paid.md b/_articles/nl/getting-paid.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4e7285c778f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_articles/nl/getting-paid.md
@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+---
+lang: nl
+title: Getting Paid for Open Source Work
+description: Sustain your work in open source by getting financial support for your time or your project.
+class: getting-paid
+toc:
+ why-some-people-seek-financial-support: "Why some people seek financial support"
+ funding-your-own-time: "Funding your own time"
+ finding-funding-for-your-project: "Finding funding for your project"
+ building-a-case-for-financial-support: "Building a case for financial support"
+order: 7
+image: /assets/images/cards/getting-paid.png
+related:
+ - best-practices
+ - leadership
+---
+
+## Why some people seek financial support
+
+Much of open source work is volunteered. For example, someone might come across a bug in a project they use and submit a quick fix, or they might enjoy tinkering with an open source project in their spare time.
+
+
+
+I was looking for a "hobby" programming project that would keep me occupied during the week around Christmas. (...) I had a home computer, and not much else on my hands. I decided to write an interpreter for the new scripting language I had been thinking about lately. (...) I chose Python as a working title.
+
+— @gvanrossum, ["Programming Python"](https://www.python.org/doc/essays/foreword/)
+
+
+
+There are many reasons why a person would not want to be paid for their open source work.
+
+* **They may already have a full-time job that they love,** which enables them to contribute to open source in their spare time.
+* **They enjoy thinking of open source as a hobby** or creative escape and don't want to feel financially obligated to work on their projects.
+* **They get other benefits from contributing to open source,** such as building their reputation or portfolio, learning a new skill, or feeling closer to a community.
+
+
+
+ Financial donations do add a feeling of responsibility, for some. (...) It's important for us, in the globally connected, fast-paced world we live in, to be able to say "not now, I feel like doing something completely different".
+
+— @alloy, ["Why We Don't Accept Donations"](https://blog.cocoapods.org/Why-we-dont-accept-donations/)
+
+
+
+For others, especially when contributions are ongoing or require significant time, getting paid to contribute to open source is the only way they can participate, either because the project requires it, or for personal reasons.
+
+Maintaining popular projects can be a significant responsibility, taking up 10 or 20 hours per week instead of a few hours per month.
+
+
+
+ Ask any open source project maintainer, and they will tell you about the reality of the amount of work that goes into managing a project. You have clients. You are fixing issues for them. You are creating new features. This becomes a real demand on your time.
+
+— @ashedryden, ["The Ethics of Unpaid Labor and the OSS Community"](https://www.ashedryden.com/blog/the-ethics-of-unpaid-labor-and-the-oss-community)
+
+
+
+Paid work also enables people from different walks of life to make meaningful contributions. Some people cannot afford to spend unpaid time on open source projects, based on their current financial position, debt, or family or other caretaking obligations. That means the world never sees contributions from talented people who can't afford to volunteer their time. This has ethical implications, as @ashedryden [has described](https://www.ashedryden.com/blog/the-ethics-of-unpaid-labor-and-the-oss-community), since work that is done is biased in favor of those who already have advantages in life, who then gain additional advantages based on their volunteer contributions, while others who are not able to volunteer then don't get later opportunities, which reinforces the current lack of diversity in the open source community.
+
+
+
+ OSS yields massive benefits to the technology industry, which, in turn, means benefits to all industries. (...) However, if the only people who can focus on it are the lucky and the obsessed, then there's a huge untapped potential.
+
+— @isaacs, ["Money and Open Source"](https://medium.com/open-source-life/money-and-open-source-d44a1953749c)
+
+
+
+If you're looking for financial support, there are two paths to consider. You can fund your own time as a contributor, or you can find organizational funding for the project.
+
+## Funding your own time
+
+Today, many people get paid to work part- or full-time on open source. The most common way to get paid for your time is to talk to your employer.
+
+It's easier to make a case for open source work if your employer actually uses the project, but get creative with your pitch. Maybe your employer doesn't use the project, but they use Python, and maintaining a popular Python project help attract new Python developers. Maybe it makes your employer look more developer-friendly in general.
+
+
+
+ Like many in open source, I was struggling with the burden of maintaining a project. When I first started doing open source, I used to just stay late to work on it or right when I got home. (...) I was able to discuss with my boss the issues I was facing and we came up with ideas on how we could incorporate open source tasks given our own use of Babel.
+
+— @hzoo, ["Maintainer Stories"](https://github.com/open-source/stories/hzoo)
+
+
+
+If you don't have an existing open source project you'd like to work on, but would rather that your current work output is open sourced, make a case for your employer to open source some of their internal software.
+
+Many companies are developing open source programs to build their brand and recruit quality talent.
+
+@hueniverse, for example, found that there were financial reasons to justify [Walmart's investment in open source](https://www.infoworld.com/article/2608897/open-source-software/walmart-s-investment-in-open-source-isn-t-cheap.html). And @jamesgpearce found that Facebook's open source program [made a difference](https://opensource.com/business/14/10/head-of-open-source-facebook-oscon) in recruiting:
+
+> It is closely aligned with our hacker culture, and how our organization was perceived. We asked our employees, "Were you aware of the open source software program at Facebook?". Two-thirds said "Yes". One-half said that the program positively contributed to their decision to work for us. These are not marginal numbers, and I hope, a trend that continues.
+
+If your company goes down this route, it's important to keep the boundaries between community and corporate activity clear. Ultimately, open source sustains itself through contributions from people all over the world, and that's bigger than any one company or location.
+
+
+
+ Getting paid to work on open source is a rare and wonderful opportunity, but you should not have to give up your passion in the process. Your passion should be why companies want to pay you.
+
+— @jessfraz, ["Blurred Lines"](https://blog.jessfraz.com/post/blurred-lines/)
+
+
+
+If you can't convince your current employer to prioritize open source work, consider finding a new employer that encourages employee contributions to open source. Look for companies that make their dedication to open source work explicit. For example:
+
+* Some companies, like [Netflix](https://netflix.github.io/) or [PayPal](https://paypal.github.io/), have websites that highlight their involvement in open source
+* [Zalando](https://opensource.zalando.com) published its [open source contribution policy](https://opensource.zalando.com/docs/using/contributing/) for employees
+
+Projects that originated at a large company, such as [Go](https://github.com/golang) or [React](https://github.com/facebook/react), will also likely employ people to work on open source.
+
+Depending on your personal circumstances, you can try raising money independently to fund your open source work. For example:
+
+* @gaearon funded his work on [Redux](https://github.com/reactjs/redux) through a [Patreon crowdfunding campaign](https://redux.js.org/)
+* @andrewgodwin funded work on Django schema migrations [through a Kickstarter campaign](https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/andrewgodwin/schema-migrations-for-django)
+
+Finally, sometimes open source projects put bounties on issues that you might consider helping with.
+
+* @ConnorChristie was able to get paid for [helping](https://web.archive.org/web/20181030123412/https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?strip=1&q=cache:https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FMARKETProtocol%2FMARKET.js%2Fissues%2F14) @MARKETProtocol work on their javascript library [through a bounty on gitcoin](https://gitcoin.co/).
+* @mamiM did Japanese translations for @MetaMask after the [issue was funded on Bounties Network](https://explorer.bounties.network/bounty/134).
+
+## Finding funding for your project
+
+Beyond arrangements for individual contributors, sometimes projects raise money from companies, individuals, or others to fund ongoing work.
+
+Organizational funding might go towards paying current contributors, covering the costs of running the project (such as hosting fees), or investing into new features or ideas.
+
+As open source's popularity increases, finding funding for projects is still experimental, but there are a few common options available.
+
+### Raise money for your work through crowdfunding campaigns or sponsorships
+
+Finding sponsorships works well if you have a strong audience or reputation already, or your project is very popular.
+A few examples of sponsored projects include:
+
+* **[webpack](https://github.com/webpack)** raises money from companies and individuals [through OpenCollective](https://opencollective.com/webpack)
+* **[Vue](https://github.com/vuejs/vue)** is [funded through Patreon](https://github.com/open-source/stories/yyx990803)
+* **[Ruby Together](https://rubytogether.org/),** a nonprofit organization that pays for work on [bundler](https://github.com/bundler/bundler), [RubyGems](https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems), and other Ruby infrastructure projects
+
+### Create a revenue stream
+
+Depending on your project, you may be able to charge for commercial support, hosted options, or additional features. A few examples include:
+
+* **[Sidekiq](https://github.com/mperham/sidekiq)** offers paid versions for additional support
+* **[Travis CI](https://github.com/travis-ci)** offers paid versions of its product
+* **[Ghost](https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost)** is a nonprofit with a paid managed service
+
+Some popular projects, like [npm](https://github.com/npm/npm) and [Docker](https://github.com/docker/docker), even raise venture capital to support their business growth.
+
+### Apply for grant funding
+
+Some software foundations and companies offer grants for open source work. Sometimes, grants can be paid out to individuals without setting up a legal entity for the project.
+
+* **[Read the Docs](https://github.com/rtfd/readthedocs.org)** received a grant from [Mozilla Open Source Support](https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/grants/)
+* **[OpenMRS](https://github.com/openmrs)** work was funded by [Stripe's Open-Source Retreat](https://stripe.com/blog/open-source-retreat-2016-grantees)
+* **[Libraries.io](https://github.com/librariesio)** received a grant from the [Sloan Foundation](https://sloan.org/programs/digital-technology)
+* The **[Python Software Foundation](https://www.python.org/psf/grants/)** offers grants for Python-related work
+
+For more detailed options and case studies, @nayafia [wrote a guide](https://github.com/nayafia/lemonade-stand) to getting paid for open source work. Different types of funding require different skills, so consider your strengths to figure out which option works best for you.
+
+## Building a case for financial support
+
+Whether your project is a new idea, or has been around for years, you should expect to put significant thought into identifying your target funder and making a compelling case.
+
+Whether you're looking to pay for your own time, or fundraise for a project, you should be able to answer the following questions.
+
+### Impact
+
+Why is this project useful? Why do your users, or potential users, like it so much? Where will it be in five years?
+
+### Traction
+
+Try to collect evidence that your project matters, whether it's metrics, anecdotes, or testimonials. Are there any companies or noteworthy people using your project right now? If not, has a prominent person endorsed it?
+
+### Value to funder
+
+Funders, whether your employer or a grantmaking foundation, are frequently approached with opportunities. Why should they support your project over any other opportunity? How do they personally benefit?
+
+### Use of funds
+
+What, exactly, will you accomplish with the proposed funding? Focus on project milestones or outcomes rather than paying a salary.
+
+### How you'll receive the funds
+
+Does the funder have any requirements around disbursal? For example, you may need to be a nonprofit or have a nonprofit fiscal sponsor. Or perhaps the funds must be given to an individual contractor rather than an organization. These requirements vary between funders, so be sure to do your research beforehand.
+
+
+
+ For years, we've been the leading resource of website friendly icons, with a community of over 20 million people and been featured on over 70 million websites, including Whitehouse.gov. (...) Version 4 was three years ago. Web tech's changed a lot since then, and frankly, Font Awesome's gotten a bit stale. (...) That's why we're introducing Font Awesome 5. We're modernizing and rewriting the CSS and redesigning every icon from top to bottom. We're talking better design, better consistency, and better readability.
+
+— @davegandy, [Font Awesome Kickstarter video](https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/232193852/font-awesome-5)
+
+
+
+## Experiment and don't give up
+
+Raising money isn't easy, whether you're an open source project, a nonprofit, or a software startup, and in most cases require you to get creative. Identifying how you want to get paid, doing your research, and putting yourself in your funder's shoes will help you build a convincing case for funding.
diff --git a/_articles/nl/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/nl/how-to-contribute.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c02def3ef02
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_articles/nl/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -0,0 +1,535 @@
+---
+lang: nl
+title: How to Contribute to Open Source
+description: Want to contribute to open source? A guide to making open source contributions, for first-timers and for veterans.
+class: contribute
+toc:
+ why-contribute-to-open-source: "Why contribute to open source?"
+ what-it-means-to-contribute: "What it means to contribute"
+ orienting-yourself-to-a-new-project: "Orienting yourself to a new project"
+ finding-a-project-to-contribute-to: "Finding a project to contribute to"
+ how-to-submit-a-contribution: "How to submit a contribution"
+ what-happens-after-you-submit-a-contribution: "What happens after you submit a contribution"
+order: 1
+image: /assets/images/cards/contribute.png
+related:
+ - beginners
+ - building
+---
+
+## Why contribute to open source?
+
+
+
+ Working on \[freenode\] helped me earn many of the skills I later used for my studies in university and my actual job. I think working on open source projects helps me as much as it helps the project!
+
+— @errietta, ["Why I love contributing to open source software"](https://www.errietta.me/blog/open-source/)
+
+
+
+Contributing to open source can be a rewarding way to learn, teach, and build experience in just about any skill you can imagine.
+
+Why do people contribute to open source? Plenty of reasons!
+
+### Improve software you rely on
+
+Lots of open source contributors start by being users of software they contribute to. When you find a bug in an open source software you use, you may want to look at the source to see if you can patch it yourself. If that's the case, then contributing the patch back is the best way to ensure that your friends (and yourself when you update to the next release) will be able to benefit from it.
+
+### Improve existing skills
+
+Whether it's coding, user interface design, graphic design, writing, or organizing, if you're looking for practice, there's a task for you on an open source project.
+
+### Meet people who are interested in similar things
+
+Open source projects with warm, welcoming communities keep people coming back for years. Many people form lifelong friendships through their participation in open source, whether it's running into each other at conferences or late night online chats about burritos.
+
+### Find mentors and teach others
+
+Working with others on a shared project means you'll have to explain how you do things, as well as ask other people for help. The acts of learning and teaching can be a fulfilling activity for everyone involved.
+
+### Build public artifacts that help you grow a reputation (and a career)
+
+By definition, all of your open source work is public, which means you get free examples to take anywhere as a demonstration of what you can do.
+
+### Learn people skills
+
+Open source offers opportunities to practice leadership and management skills, such as resolving conflicts, organizing teams of people, and prioritizing work.
+
+### It's empowering to be able to make changes, even small ones
+
+You don't have to become a lifelong contributor to enjoy participating in open source. Have you ever seen a typo on a website, and wished someone would fix it? On an open source project, you can do just that. Open source helps people feel agency over their lives and how they experience the world, and that in itself is gratifying.
+
+## What it means to contribute
+
+If you're a new open source contributor, the process can be intimidating. How do you find the right project? What if you don't know how to code? What if something goes wrong?
+
+Not to worry! There are all sorts of ways to get involved with an open source project, and a few tips will help you get the most out of your experience.
+
+### You don't have to contribute code
+
+A common misconception about contributing to open source is that you need to contribute code. In fact, it's often the other parts of a project that are [most neglected or overlooked](https://github.com/blog/2195-the-shape-of-open-source). You'll do the project a _huge_ favor by offering to pitch in with these types of contributions!
+
+
+
+ I’ve been renowned for my work on CocoaPods, but most people don’t know that I actually don’t do any real work on the CocoaPods tool itself. My time on the project is mostly spent doing things like documentation and working on branding.
+
+— @orta, ["Moving to OSS by default"](https://academy.realm.io/posts/orta-therox-moving-to-oss-by-default/)
+
+
+
+Even if you like to write code, other types of contributions are a great way to get involved with a project and meet other community members. Building those relationships will give you opportunities to work on other parts of the project.
+
+
+
+ I first reached out to the Python development team (aka python-dev) when I emailed the mailing list on June 17, 2002 about accepting my patch. I quickly caught the open source bug, and decided to start curating email digests for the group. They gave me a great excuse to ask for clarifications about a topic, but more critically I was able to notice when someone pointed out something that needed fixing.
+
+— @brettcannon, ["Maintainer Stories"](https://github.com/open-source/stories/brettcannon)
+
+
+
+### Do you like planning events?
+
+* Organize workshops or meetups about the project, [like @fzamperin did for NodeSchool](https://github.com/nodeschool/organizers/issues/406)
+* Organize the project's conference (if they have one)
+* Help community members find the right conferences and submit proposals for speaking
+
+### Do you like to design?
+
+* Restructure layouts to improve the project's usability
+* Conduct user research to reorganize and refine the project's navigation or menus, [like Drupal suggests](https://www.drupal.org/community-initiatives/drupal-core/usability)
+* Put together a style guide to help the project have a consistent visual design
+* Create art for t-shirts or a new logo, [like hapi.js's contributors did](https://github.com/hapijs/contrib/issues/68)
+
+### Do you like to write?
+
+* Write and improve the project's documentation
+* Curate a folder of examples showing how the project is used
+* Start a newsletter for the project, or curate highlights from the mailing list
+* Write tutorials for the project, [like PyPA's contributors did](https://github.com/pypa/python-packaging-user-guide/issues/194)
+* Write a translation for the project's documentation
+
+
+
+ Seriously, \[documentation\] is mega-important. The documentation so far has been great and has been a killer feature of Babel. There are sections that could certainly use some work and even the addition of a paragraph here or there is extremely appreciated.
+
+— @kittens, ["Call for contributors"](https://github.com/babel/babel/issues/1347)
+
+
+
+### Do you like organizing?
+
+* Link to duplicate issues, and suggest new issue labels, to keep things organized
+* Go through open issues and suggest closing old ones, [like @nzakas did for ESLint](https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/6765)
+* Ask clarifying questions on recently opened issues to move the discussion forward
+
+### Do you like to code?
+
+* Find an open issue to tackle, [like @dianjin did for Leaflet](https://github.com/Leaflet/Leaflet/issues/4528#issuecomment-216520560)
+* Ask if you can help write a new feature
+* Automate project setup
+* Improve tooling and testing
+
+### Do you like helping people?
+
+* Answer questions about the project on e.g., Stack Overflow ([like this Postgres example](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18664074/getting-error-peer-authentication-failed-for-user-postgres-when-trying-to-ge)) or Reddit
+* Answer questions for people on open issues
+* Help moderate the discussion boards or conversation channels
+
+### Do you like helping others code?
+
+* Review code on other people's submissions
+* Write tutorials for how a project can be used
+* Offer to mentor another contributor, [like @ereichert did for @bronzdoc on Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/book/issues/123#issuecomment-238049666)
+
+### You don't just have to work on software projects!
+
+While "open source" often refers to software, you can collaborate on just about anything. There are books, recipes, lists, and classes that get developed as open source projects.
+
+For example:
+
+* @sindresorhus curates a [list of "awesome" lists](https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome)
+* @h5bp maintains a [list of potential interview questions](https://github.com/h5bp/Front-end-Developer-Interview-Questions) for front-end developer candidates
+* @stuartlynn and @nicole-a-tesla made a [collection of fun facts about puffins](https://github.com/stuartlynn/puffin_facts)
+
+Even if you're a software developer, working on a documentation project can help you get started in open source. It's often less intimidating to work on projects that don't involve code, and the process of collaboration will build your confidence and experience.
+
+## Orienting yourself to a new project
+
+
+
+ If you go to an issue tracker and things seem confusing, it's not just you. These tools require a lot of implicit knowledge, but people can help you navigate it and you can ask them questions.
+
+— @shaunagm, ["How to Contribute to Open Source"](https://readwrite.com/2014/10/10/open-source-diversity-how-to-contribute/)
+
+
+
+For anything more than a typo fix, contributing to open source is like walking up to a group of strangers at a party. If you start talking about llamas, while they were deep in a discussion about goldfish, they'll probably look at you a little strangely.
+
+Before jumping in blindly with your own suggestions, start by learning how to read the room. Doing so increases the chances that your ideas will be noticed and heard.
+
+### Anatomy of an open source project
+
+Every open source community is different.
+
+Spending years on one open source project means you've gotten to know one open source project. Move to a different project, and you might find the vocabulary, norms, and communication styles are completely different.
+
+That said, many open source projects follow a similar organizational structure. Understanding the different community roles and overall process will help you get quickly oriented to any new project.
+
+A typical open source project has the following types of people:
+
+* **Author:** The person/s or organization that created the project
+* **Owner:** The person/s who has administrative ownership over the organization or repository (not always the same as the original author)
+* **Maintainers:** Contributors who are responsible for driving the vision and managing the organizational aspects of the project (They may also be authors or owners of the project.)
+* **Contributors:** Everyone who has contributed something back to the project
+* **Community Members:** People who use the project. They might be active in conversations or express their opinion on the project's direction
+
+Bigger projects may also have subcommittees or working groups focused on different tasks, such as tooling, triage, community moderation, and event organizing. Look on a project's website for a "team" page, or in the repository for governance documentation, to find this information.
+
+A project also has documentation. These files are usually listed in the top level of a repository.
+
+* **LICENSE:** By definition, every open source project must have an [open source license](https://choosealicense.com). If the project does not have a license, it is not open source.
+* **README:** The README is the instruction manual that welcomes new community members to the project. It explains why the project is useful and how to get started.
+* **CONTRIBUTING:** Whereas READMEs help people _use_ the project, contributing docs help people _contribute_ to the project. It explains what types of contributions are needed and how the process works. While not every project has a CONTRIBUTING file, its presence signals that this is a welcoming project to contribute to.
+* **CODE_OF_CONDUCT:** The code of conduct sets ground rules for participants' behavior associated and helps to facilitate a friendly, welcoming environment. While not every project has a CODE_OF_CONDUCT file, its presence signals that this is a welcoming project to contribute to.
+* **Other documentation:** There might be additional documentation, such as tutorials, walkthroughs, or governance policies, especially on bigger projects.
+
+Finally, open source projects use the following tools to organize discussion. Reading through the archives will give you a good picture of how the community thinks and works.
+
+* **Issue tracker:** Where people discuss issues related to the project.
+* **Pull requests:** Where people discuss and review changes that are in progress.
+* **Discussion forums or mailing lists:** Some projects may use these channels for conversational topics (for example, _"How do I..."_ or _"What do you think about..."_ instead of bug reports or feature requests). Others use the issue tracker for all conversations.
+* **Synchronous chat channel:** Some projects use chat channels (such as Slack or IRC) for casual conversation, collaboration, and quick exchanges.
+
+## Finding a project to contribute to
+
+Now that you've figured out how open source projects work, it's time to find a project to contribute to!
+
+If you've never contributed to open source before, take some advice from U.S. President John F. Kennedy, who once said, _"Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country."_
+
+Contributing to open source happens at all levels, across projects. You don't need to overthink what exactly your first contribution will be, or how it will look.
+
+Instead, start by thinking about the projects you already use, or want to use. The projects you'll actively contribute to are the ones you find yourself coming back to.
+
+Within those projects, whenever you catch yourself thinking that something could be better or different, act on your instinct.
+
+Open source isn't an exclusive club; it's made by people just like you. "Open source" is just a fancy term for treating the world's problems as fixable.
+
+You might scan a README and find a broken link or a typo. Or you're a new user and you noticed something is broken, or an issue that you think should really be in the documentation. Instead of ignoring it and moving on, or asking someone else to fix it, see whether you can help out by pitching in. That's what open source is all about!
+
+> [28% of casual contributions](https://www.igor.pro.br/publica/papers/saner2016.pdf) to open source are documentation, such as a typo fix, reformatting, or writing a translation.
+
+If you're looking for existing issues you can fix, every open source project has a `/contribute` page that highlights beginner-friendly issues you can start out with. Navigate to the main page of the repository on GitHub, and add `/contribute` at the end of the URL (for example [`https://github.com/facebook/react/contribute`](https://github.com/facebook/react/contribute)).
+
+You can also use one of the following resources to help you discover and contribute to new projects:
+
+* [GitHub Explore](https://github.com/explore/)
+* [Open Source Friday](https://opensourcefriday.com)
+* [First Timers Only](https://www.firsttimersonly.com/)
+* [CodeTriage](https://www.codetriage.com/)
+* [24 Pull Requests](https://24pullrequests.com/)
+* [Up For Grabs](https://up-for-grabs.net/)
+* [Contributor-ninja](https://contributor.ninja)
+* [First Contributions](https://firstcontributions.github.io)
+* [SourceSort](https://www.sourcesort.com/)
+
+### A checklist before you contribute
+
+When you've found a project you'd like to contribute to, do a quick scan to make sure that the project is suitable for accepting contributions. Otherwise, your hard work may never get a response.
+
+Here's a handy checklist to evaluate whether a project is good for new contributors.
+
+**Meets the definition of open source**
+
+
+
+
+ Does it have a license? Usually, there is a file called LICENSE in the root of the repository.
+
+
+
+**Project actively accepts contributions**
+
+Look at the commit activity on the master branch. On GitHub, you can see this information on a repository's homepage.
+
+
+
+
+ When was the latest commit?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ How many contributors does the project have?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ How often do people commit? (On GitHub, you can find this by clicking "Commits" in the top bar.)
+
+
+
+Next, look at the project's issues.
+
+
+
+
+ How many open issues are there?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Do maintainers respond quickly to issues when they are opened?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Is there active discussion on the issues?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Are the issues recent?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Are issues getting closed? (On GitHub, click the "closed" tab on the Issues page to see closed issues.)
+
+
+
+Now do the same for the project's pull requests.
+
+
+
+
+ How many open pull requests are there?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Do maintainers respond quickly to pull requests when they are opened?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Is there active discussion on the pull requests?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Are the pull requests recent?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ How recently were any pull requests merged? (On GitHub, click the "closed" tab on the Pull Requests page to see closed PRs.)
+
+
+
+**Project is welcoming**
+
+A project that is friendly and welcoming signals that they will be receptive to new contributors.
+
+
+
+
+ Do the maintainers respond helpfully to questions in issues?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Are people friendly in the issues, discussion forum, and chat (for example, IRC or Slack)?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Do pull requests get reviewed?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Do maintainers thank people for their contributions?
+
+
+
+
+
+ Whenever you see a long thread, spot check responses from core developers coming late in the thread. Are they summarizing constructively, and taking steps to bring the thread to a decision while remaining polite? If you see a lot of flame wars going on, that's often a sign that energy is going into argument instead of into development.
+
+— @kfogel, [_Producing OSS_](https://producingoss.com/en/evaluating-oss-projects.html)
+
+
+
+## How to submit a contribution
+
+You've found a project you like, and you're ready to make a contribution. Finally! Here's how to get your contribution in the right way.
+
+### Communicating effectively
+
+Whether you're a one-time contributor or trying to join a community, working with others is one of the most important skills you'll develop in open source.
+
+
+
+ \[As a new contributor,\] I quickly realized I had to ask questions if I wanted to be able to close the issue. I skimmed through the code base. Once I had some sense of what was going on, I asked for more direction. And voilà! I was able to solve the issue after getting all the relevant details I needed.
+
+— @shubheksha, [A Beginner's Very Bumpy Journey Through The World of Open Source](https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/a-beginners-very-bumpy-journey-through-the-world-of-open-source-4d108d540b39/)
+
+
+
+Before you open an issue or pull request, or ask a question in chat, keep these points in mind to help your ideas come across effectively.
+
+**Give context.** Help others get quickly up to speed. If you're running into an error, explain what you're trying to do and how to reproduce it. If you're suggesting a new idea, explain why you think it'd be useful to the project (not just to you!).
+
+> 😇 _"X doesn't happen when I do Y"_
+>
+> 😢 _"X is broken! Please fix it."_
+
+**Do your homework beforehand.** It's OK not to know things, but show that you tried. Before asking for help, be sure to check a project's README, documentation, issues (open or closed), mailing list, and search the internet for an answer. People will appreciate when you demonstrate that you're trying to learn.
+
+> 😇 _"I'm not sure how to implement X. I checked the help docs and didn't find any mentions."_
+>
+> 😢 _"How do I X?"_
+
+**Keep requests short and direct.** Much like sending an email, every contribution, no matter how simple or helpful, requires someone else's review. Many projects have more incoming requests than people available to help. Be concise. You will increase the chance that someone will be able to help you.
+
+> 😇 _"I'd like to write an API tutorial."_
+>
+> 😢 _"I was driving down the highway the other day and stopped for gas, and then I had this amazing idea for something we should be doing, but before I explain that, let me show you..."_
+
+**Keep all communication public.** Although it's tempting, don't reach out to maintainers privately unless you need to share sensitive information (such as a security issue or serious conduct violation). When you keep the conversation public, more people can learn and benefit from your exchange. Discussions can be, in themselves, contributions.
+
+> 😇 _(as a comment) "@-maintainer Hi there! How should we proceed on this PR?"_
+>
+> 😢 _(as an email) "Hey there, sorry to bother you over email, but I was wondering if you've had a chance to review my PR"_
+
+**It's okay to ask questions (but be patient!).** Everybody was new to the project at some point, and even experienced contributors need to get up to speed when they look at a new project. By the same token, even longtime maintainers are not always familiar with every part of the project. Show them the same patience that you'd want them to show to you.
+
+> 😇 _"Thanks for looking into this error. I followed your suggestions. Here's the output."_
+>
+> 😢 _"Why can't you fix my problem? Isn't this your project?"_
+
+**Respect community decisions.** Your ideas may differ from the community's priorities or vision. They may offer feedback or decide not to pursue your idea. While you should discuss and look for compromise, maintainers have to live with your decision longer than you will. If you disagree with their direction, you can always work on your own fork or start your own project.
+
+> 😇 _"I'm disappointed you can't support my use case, but as you've explained it only affects a minor portion of users, I understand why. Thanks for listening."_
+>
+> 😢 _"Why won't you support my use case? This is unacceptable!"_
+
+**Above all, keep it classy.** Open source is made up of collaborators from all over the world. Context gets lost across languages, cultures, geographies, and time zones. In addition, written communication makes it harder to convey a tone or mood. Assume good intentions in these conversations. It's fine to politely push back on an idea, ask for more context, or further clarify your position. Just try to leave the internet a better place than when you found it.
+
+### Gathering context
+
+Before doing anything, do a quick check to make sure your idea hasn't been discussed elsewhere. Skim the project's README, issues (open and closed), mailing list, and Stack Overflow. You don't have to spend hours going through everything, but a quick search for a few key terms goes a long way.
+
+If you can't find your idea elsewhere, you're ready to make a move. If the project is on GitHub, you'll likely communicate by opening an issue or pull request:
+
+* **Issues** are like starting a conversation or discussion
+* **Pull requests** are for starting work on a solution
+* **For lightweight communication,** such as a clarifying or how-to question, try asking on Stack Overflow, IRC, Slack, or other chat channels, if the project has one
+
+Before you open an issue or pull request, check the project's contributing docs (usually a file called CONTRIBUTING, or in the README), to see whether you need to include anything specific. For example, they may ask that you follow a template, or require that you use tests.
+
+If you want to make a substantial contribution, open an issue to ask before working on it. It's helpful to watch the project for a while (on GitHub, [you can click "Watch"](https://help.github.com/articles/watching-repositories/) to be notified of all conversations), and get to know community members, before doing work that might not get accepted.
+
+
+
+### Opening an issue
+
+You should usually open an issue in the following situations:
+
+* Report an error you can't solve yourself
+* Discuss a high-level topic or idea (for example, community, vision or policies)
+* Propose a new feature or other project idea
+
+Tips for communicating on issues:
+
+* **If you see an open issue that you want to tackle,** comment on the issue to let people know you're on it. That way, people are less likely to duplicate your work.
+* **If an issue was opened a while ago,** it's possible that it's being addressed somewhere else, or has already been resolved, so comment to ask for confirmation before starting work.
+* **If you opened an issue, but figured out the answer later on your own,** comment on the issue to let people know, then close the issue. Even documenting that outcome is a contribution to the project.
+
+### Opening a pull request
+
+You should usually open a pull request in the following situations:
+
+* Submit trivial fixes (for example, a typo, a broken link or an obvious error)
+* Start work on a contribution that was already asked for, or that you've already discussed, in an issue
+
+A pull request doesn't have to represent finished work. It's usually better to open a pull request early on, so others can watch or give feedback on your progress. Just mark it as a "WIP" (Work in Progress) in the subject line. You can always add more commits later.
+
+If the project is on GitHub, here's how to submit a pull request:
+
+* **[Fork the repository](https://guides.github.com/activities/forking/)** and clone it locally. Connect your local to the original "upstream" repository by adding it as a remote. Pull in changes from "upstream" often so that you stay up to date so that when you submit your pull request, merge conflicts will be less likely. (See more detailed instructions [here](https://help.github.com/articles/syncing-a-fork/).)
+* **[Create a branch](https://guides.github.com/introduction/flow/)** for your edits.
+* **Reference any relevant issues** or supporting documentation in your PR (for example, "Closes #37.")
+* **Include screenshots of the before and after** if your changes include differences in HTML/CSS. Drag and drop the images into the body of your pull request.
+* **Test your changes!** Run your changes against any existing tests if they exist and create new ones when needed. Whether tests exist or not, make sure your changes don't break the existing project.
+* **Contribute in the style of the project** to the best of your abilities. This may mean using indents, semi-colons or comments differently than you would in your own repository, but makes it easier for the maintainer to merge, others to understand and maintain in the future.
+
+If this is your first pull request, check out [Make a Pull Request](http://makeapullrequest.com/), which @kentcdodds created as a walkthrough video tutorial. You can also practice making a pull request in the [First Contributions](https://github.com/Roshanjossey/first-contributions) repository, created by @Roshanjossey.
+
+## What happens after you submit a contribution
+
+You did it! Congratulations on becoming an open source contributor. We hope it's the first of many.
+
+After you submit a contribution, one of the following will happen:
+
+### 😭 You don't get a response.
+
+Hopefully you [checked the project for signs of activity](#a-checklist-before-you-contribute) before making a contribution. Even on an active project, however, it's possible that your contribution won't get a response.
+
+If you haven't gotten a response in over a week, it's fair to politely respond in that same thread, asking someone for a review. If you know the name of the right person to review your contribution, you can @-mention them in that thread.
+
+**Don't** reach out to that person privately; remember that public communication is vital to open source projects.
+
+If you make a polite bump and still nobody responds, it's possible that nobody will respond, ever. It's not a great feeling, but don't let that discourage you. It's happened to everyone! There are many possible reasons why you didn't get a response, including personal circumstances that may be out of your control. Try to find another project or way to contribute. If anything, this is a good reason not to invest too much time in making a contribution before other community members are engaged and responsive.
+
+### 🚧 Someone requests changes to your contribution.
+
+It's common that you'll be asked to make changes to your contribution, whether that's feedback on the scope of your idea, or changes to your code.
+
+When someone requests changes, be responsive. They've taken the time to review your contribution. Opening a PR and walking away is bad form. If you don't know how to make changes, research the problem, then ask for help if you need it.
+
+If you don't have time to work on the issue anymore (for example, if the conversation has been going on for months, and your circumstances have changed), let the maintainer know so they're not expecting a response. Someone else may be happy to take over.
+
+### 👎 Your contribution doesn't get accepted.
+
+Your contribution may or may not be accepted in the end. Hopefully you didn't put too much work into it already. If you're not sure why it wasn't accepted, it's perfectly reasonable to ask the maintainer for feedback and clarification. Ultimately, however, you'll need to respect that this is their decision. Don't argue or get hostile. You're always welcome to fork and work on your own version if you disagree!
+
+### 🎉 Your contribution gets accepted.
+
+Hooray! You've successfully made an open source contribution!
+
+## You did it!
+
+Whether you just made your first open source contribution, or you're looking for new ways to contribute, we hope you're inspired to take action. Even if your contribution wasn't accepted, don't forget to say thanks when a maintainer put effort into helping you. Open source is made by people like you: one issue, pull request, comment, or high-five at a time.
diff --git a/_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md b/_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4b4d7963bb1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md
@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+---
+lang: nl
+title: Leadership and Governance
+description: Growing open source projects can benefit from formal rules for making decisions.
+class: leadership
+toc:
+ understanding-governance-for-your-growing-project: "Understanding governance for your growing project"
+ what-are-examples-of-formal-roles-used-in-open-source-projects: "What are examples of formal roles used in open source projects?"
+ how-do-i-formalize-these-leadership-roles: "How do I formalize these leadership roles?"
+ when-should-i-give-someone-commit-access: "When should I give someone commit access?"
+ what-are-some-of-the-common-governance-structures-for-open-source-projects: "What are some of the common governance structures for open source projects?"
+ do-i-need-governance-docs-when-i-launch-my-project: "Do I need governance docs when I launch my project?"
+ what-happens-if-corporate-employees-start-submitting-contributions: "What happens if corporate employees start submitting contributions?"
+ do-i-need-a-legal-entity-to-support-my-project: "Do I need a legal entity to support my project?"
+order: 6
+image: /assets/images/cards/leadership.png
+related:
+ - best-practices
+ - metrics
+---
+
+## Understanding governance for your growing project
+
+Your project is growing, people are engaged, and you're committed to keeping this thing going. At this stage, you may be wondering how to incorporate regular project contributors into your workflow, whether it's giving someone commit access or resolving community debates. If you have questions, we've got answers.
+
+## What are examples of formal roles used in open source projects?
+
+Many projects follow a similar structure for contributor roles and recognition.
+
+What these roles actually mean, though, is entirely up to you. Here are a few types of roles you may recognize:
+
+* **Maintainer**
+* **Contributor**
+* **Committer**
+
+**For some projects, "maintainers"** are the only people in a project with commit access. In other projects, they're simply the people who are listed in the README as maintainers.
+
+A maintainer doesn't necessarily have to be someone who writes code for your project. It could be someone who's done a lot of work evangelizing your project, or written documentation that made the project more accessible to others. Regardless of what they do day-to-day, a maintainer is probably someone who feels responsibility over the direction of the project and is committed to improving it.
+
+**A "contributor" could be anyone** who comments on an issue or pull request, people who add value to the project (whether it's triaging issues, writing code, or organizing events), or anybody with a merged pull request (perhaps the narrowest definition of a contributor).
+
+
+
+ \[For Node.js,\] every person who shows up to comment on an issue or submit code is a member of a project’s community. Just being able to see them means that they have crossed the line from being a user to being a contributor.
+
+— @mikeal, ["Healthy Open Source"](https://medium.com/the-javascript-collection/healthy-open-source-967fa8be7951)
+
+
+
+**The term "committer"** might be used to distinguish commit access, which is a specific type of responsibility, from other forms of contribution.
+
+While you can define your project roles any way you'd like, [consider using broader definitions](../how-to-contribute/#what-it-means-to-contribute) to encourage more forms of contribution. You can use leadership roles to formally recognize people who have made outstanding contributions to your project, regardless of their technical skill.
+
+
+
+ You might know me as the "inventor" of Django...but really I'm the guy who got hired to work on a thing a year after it was already made. (...) People suspect that I'm successful because of my programming skill...but I'm at best an average programmer.
+
+— @jacobian, ["PyCon 2015 Keynote" (video)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIJdFxYlEKE#t=5m0s)
+
+
+
+## How do I formalize these leadership roles?
+
+Formalizing your leadership roles helps people feel ownership and tells other community members who to look to for help.
+
+For a smaller project, designating leaders can be as simple as adding their names to your README or a CONTRIBUTORS text file.
+
+For a bigger project, if you have a website, create a team page or list your project leaders there. For example, [Postgres](https://github.com/postgres/postgres/) has a [comprehensive team page](https://www.postgresql.org/community/contributors/) with short profiles for each contributor.
+
+If your project has a very active contributor community, you might form a "core team" of maintainers, or even subcommittees of people who take ownership of different issue areas (for example, security, issue triaging, or community conduct). Let people self-organize and volunteer for the roles they're most excited about, rather than assigning them.
+
+
+ \[We\] supplement the core team with several "subteams". Each subteam is focused on a specific area, e.g., language design or libraries. (...) To ensure global coordination and a strong, coherent vision for the project as a whole, each subteam is led by a member of the core team.
+
+— ["Rust Governance RFC"](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/HEAD/text/1068-rust-governance.md)
+
+
+
+Leadership teams may want to create a designated channel (like on IRC) or meet regularly to discuss the project (like on Gitter or Google Hangout). You can even make those meetings public so other people can listen. [Cucumber-ruby](https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber-ruby), for example, [hosts office hours every week](https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber-ruby/blob/HEAD/CONTRIBUTING.md#talking-with-other-devs).
+
+Once you've established leadership roles, don't forget to document how people can attain them! Establish a clear process for how someone can become a maintainer or join a subcommittee in your project, and write it into your GOVERNANCE.md.
+
+Tools like [Vossibility](https://github.com/icecrime/vossibility-stack) can help you publicly track who is (or isn't) making contributions to the project. Documenting this information avoids the community perception that maintainers are a clique that makes its decisions privately.
+
+Finally, if your project is on GitHub, consider moving your project from your personal account to an Organization and adding at least one backup admin. [GitHub Organizations](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-new-organization-account/) make it easier to manage permissions and multiple repositories and protect your project's legacy through [shared ownership](../building-community/#share-ownership-of-your-project).
+
+## When should I give someone commit access?
+
+Some people think you should give commit access to everybody who makes a contribution. Doing so could encourage more people to feel ownership of your project.
+
+On the other hand, especially for bigger, more complex projects, you may want to only give commit access to people who have demonstrated their commitment. There's no one right way of doing it - do what makes you most comfortable!
+
+If your project is on GitHub, you can use [protected branches](https://help.github.com/articles/about-protected-branches/) to manage who can push to a particular branch, and under which circumstances.
+
+
+
+ Whenever somebody sends you a pull request, give them commit access to your project. While it may sound incredibly stupid at first, using this strategy will allow you to unleash the true power of GitHub. (...) Once people have commit access, they are no longer worried that their patch might go unmerged...causing them to put much more work into it.
+
+— @felixge, ["The Pull Request Hack"](https://felixge.de/2013/03/11/the-pull-request-hack.html)
+
+
+
+## What are some of the common governance structures for open source projects?
+
+There are three common governance structures associated with open source projects.
+
+* **BDFL:** BDFL stands for "Benevolent Dictator for Life". Under this structure, one person (usually the initial author of the project) has final say on all major project decisions. [Python](https://github.com/python) is a classic example. Smaller projects are probably BDFL by default, because there are only one or two maintainers. A project that originated at a company might also fall into the BDFL category.
+
+* **Meritocracy:** **(Note: the term "meritocracy" carries negative connotations for some communities and has a [complex social and political history](http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Meritocracy).)** Under a meritocracy, active project contributors (those who demonstrate "merit") are given a formal decision making role. Decisions are usually made based on pure voting consensus. The meritocracy concept was pioneered by the [Apache Foundation](https://www.apache.org/); [all Apache projects](https://www.apache.org/index.html#projects-list) are meritocracies. Contributions can only be made by individuals representing themselves, not by a company.
+
+* **Liberal contribution:** Under a liberal contribution model, the people who do the most work are recognized as most influential, but this is based on current work and not historic contributions. Major project decisions are made based on a consensus seeking process (discuss major grievances) rather than pure vote, and strive to include as many community perspectives as possible. Popular examples of projects that use a liberal contribution model include [Node.js](https://foundation.nodejs.org/) and [Rust](https://www.rust-lang.org/).
+
+Which one should you use? It's up to you! Every model has advantages and trade-offs. And although they may seem quite different at first, all three models have more in common than they seem. If you're interested in adopting one of these models, check out these templates:
+
+* [BDFL model template](http://oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/benevolentdictatorgovernancemodel)
+* [Meritocracy model template](http://oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/meritocraticgovernancemodel)
+* [Node.js's liberal contribution policy](https://medium.com/the-node-js-collection/healthy-open-source-967fa8be7951)
+
+## Do I need governance docs when I launch my project?
+
+There is no right time to write down your project's governance, but it's much easier to define once you've seen your community dynamics play out. The best (and hardest) part about open source governance is that it is shaped by the community!
+
+Some early documentation will inevitably contribute to your project's governance, however, so start writing down what you can. For example, you can define clear expectations for behavior, or how your contributor process works, even at your project's launch.
+
+If you're part of a company launching an open source project, it's worth having an internal discussion before launch about how your company expects to maintain and make decisions about the project moving forward. You may also want to publicly explain anything particular to how your company will (or won't!) be involved with the project.
+
+
+
+ We assign small teams to manage projects on GitHub who are actually working on these at Facebook. For example, React is run by a React engineer.
+
+— @caabernathy, ["An inside look at open source at Facebook"](https://opensource.com/life/15/10/ato-interview-christine-abernathy-facebook)
+
+
+
+## What happens if corporate employees start submitting contributions?
+
+Successful open source projects get used by many people and companies, and some companies may eventually have revenue streams eventually tied to the project. For example, a company may use the project's code as one component in a commercial service offering.
+
+As the project gets more widely used, people who have expertise in it become more in-demand - you may be one of them! - and will sometimes get paid for work they do in the project.
+
+It's important to treat commercial activity as normal and as just another source of development energy. Paid developers shouldn't get special treatment over unpaid ones, of course; each contribution must be evaluated on its technical merits. However, people should feel comfortable engaging in commercial activity, and feel comfortable stating their use cases when arguing in favor of a particular enhancement or feature.
+
+"Commercial" is completely compatible with "open source". "Commercial" just means there is money involved somewhere - that the software is used in commerce, which is increasingly likely as a project gains adoption. (When open source software is used as part of a non-open-source product, the overall product is still "proprietary" software, though, like open source, it might be used for commercial or non-commercial purposes.)
+
+Like anyone else, commercially-motivated developers gain influence in the project through the quality and quantity of their contributions. Obviously, a developer who is paid for her time may be able to do more than someone who is not paid, but that's okay: payment is just one of many possible factors that could affect how much someone does. Keep your project discussions focused on the contributions, not on the external factors that enable people to make those contributions.
+
+## Do I need a legal entity to support my project?
+
+You don't need a legal entity to support your open source project unless you're handling money.
+
+For example, if you want to create a commercial business, you'll want to set up a C Corp or LLC (if you're based in the US). If you're just doing contract work related to your open source project, you can accept money as a sole proprietor, or set up an LLC (if you're based in the US).
+
+If you want to accept donations for your open source project, you can set up a donation button (using PayPal or Stripe, for example), but the money won't be tax-deductible unless you are a qualifying nonprofit (a 501c3, if you're in the US).
+
+Many projects don't wish to go through the trouble of setting up a nonprofit, so they find a nonprofit fiscal sponsor instead. A fiscal sponsor accepts donations on your behalf, usually in exchange for a percentage of the donation. [Software Freedom Conservancy](https://sfconservancy.org/), [Apache Foundation](https://www.apache.org/), [Eclipse Foundation](https://eclipse.org/org/foundation/), [Linux Foundation](https://www.linuxfoundation.org/projects) and [Open Collective](https://opencollective.com/opensource) are examples of organizations that serve as fiscal sponsors for open source projects.
+
+
+
+ Our goal is to provide an infrastructure that communities can use to be self sustainable, thus creating an environment where everyone — contributors, backers, sponsors — get concrete benefits out of it.
+
+— @piamancini, ["Moving beyond the charity framework"](https://medium.com/open-collective/moving-beyond-the-charity-framework-b1191c33141)
+
+
+
+If your project is closely associated with a certain language or ecosystem, there may also be a related software foundation you can work with. For example, the [Python Software Foundation](https://www.python.org/psf/) helps support [PyPI](https://pypi.org/), the Python package manager, and the [Node.js Foundation](https://foundation.nodejs.org/) helps support [Express.js](https://expressjs.com/), a Node-based framework.
diff --git a/_articles/nl/legal.md b/_articles/nl/legal.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..02b8fb25799
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_articles/nl/legal.md
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+---
+lang: nl
+title: The Legal Side of Open Source
+description: Everything you've ever wondered about the legal side of open source, and a few things you didn't.
+class: legal
+toc:
+ why-do-people-care-so-much-about-the-legal-side-of-open-source: "Why do people care so much about the legal side of open source?"
+ are-public-github-projects-open-source: "Are public GitHub projects open source?"
+ just-give-me-the-tldr-on-what-i-need-to-protect-my-project: "Just give me the TL;DR on what I need to protect my project"
+ which-open-source-license-is-appropriate-for-my-project: "Which open source license is appropriate for my project?"
+ what-if-i-want-to-change-the-license-of-my-project: "What if I want to change the license of my project?"
+ does-my-project-need-an-additional-contributor-agreement: "Does my project need an additional contributor agreement?"
+ what-does-my-companys-legal-team-need-to-know: "What does my company’s legal team need to know?"
+order: 10
+image: /assets/images/cards/legal.png
+related:
+ - contribute
+ - leadership
+---
+
+## Understanding the legal implications of open source
+
+Sharing your creative work with the world can be an exciting and rewarding experience. It can also mean a bunch of legal things you didn't know you had to worry about. Thankfully, you don't have to start from scratch. We've got your legal needs covered. (Before you dig in, be sure to read our [disclaimer](/notices/).)
+
+## Why do people care so much about the legal side of open source?
+
+Glad you asked! When you make a creative work (such as writing, graphics, or code), that work is under exclusive copyright by default. That is, the law assumes that as the author of your work, you have a say in what others can do with it.
+
+In general, that means nobody else can use, copy, distribute, or modify your work without being at risk of take-downs, shake-downs, or litigation.
+
+Open source is an unusual circumstance, however, because the author expects that others will use, modify, and share the work. But because the legal default is still exclusive copyright, you need a license that explicitly states these permissions.
+
+If you don't apply an open source license, everybody who contributes to your project also becomes an exclusive copyright holder of their work. That means nobody can use, copy, distribute, or modify their contributions -- and that "nobody" includes you.
+
+Finally, your project may have dependencies with license requirements that you weren't aware of. Your project's community, or your employer's policies, may also require your project to use specific open source licenses. We'll cover these situations below.
+
+## Are public GitHub projects open source?
+
+When you [create a new project](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-new-repository/) on GitHub, you have the option to make the repository **private** or **public**.
+
+![Create repository](/assets/images/legal/repo-create-name.png)
+
+**Making your GitHub project public is not the same as licensing your project.** Public projects are covered by [GitHub's Terms of Service](https://help.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-terms-of-service#3-ownership-of-content-right-to-post-and-license-grants), which allows others to view and fork your project, but your work otherwise comes with no permissions.
+
+If you want others to use, distribute, modify, or contribute back to your project, you need to include an open source license. For example, someone cannot legally use any part of your GitHub project in their code, even if it's public, unless you explicitly give them the right to do so.
+
+## Just give me the TL;DR on what I need to protect my project.
+
+You're in luck, because today, open source licenses are standardized and easy to use. You can copy-paste an existing license directly into your project.
+
+[MIT](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/), [Apache 2.0](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/), and [GPLv3](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/gpl-3.0/) are the most popular open source licenses, but there are other options to choose from. You can find the full text of these licenses, and instructions on how to use them, on [choosealicense.com](https://choosealicense.com/).
+
+When you create a new project on GitHub, you'll be [asked to add a license](https://help.github.com/articles/open-source-licensing/).
+
+
+
+ A standardized license serves as a proxy for those without legal training to know precisely what they can and can't do with the software. Unless absolutely required, avoid custom, modified, or non-standard terms, which will serve as a barrier to downstream use of the agency code.
+
+— @benbalter, ["Everything a government attorney needs to know about open source software licensing"](https://ben.balter.com/2014/10/08/open-source-licensing-for-government-attorneys/)
+
+
+
+## Which open source license is appropriate for my project?
+
+If you're starting from a blank slate, it's hard to go wrong with the [MIT License](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/). It's short, very easy to understand, and allows anyone to do anything so long as they keep a copy of the license, including your copyright notice. You'll be able to release the project under a different license if you ever need to.
+
+Otherwise, picking the right open source license for your project depends on your objectives.
+
+Your project very likely has (or will have) **dependencies**. For example, if you're open sourcing a Node.js project, you'll probably use libraries from the Node Package Manager (npm). Each of those libraries you depend on will have its own open source license. If each of their licenses is "permissive" (gives the public permission to use, modify, and share, without any condition for downstream licensing), you can use any license you want. Common permissive licenses include MIT, Apache 2.0, ISC, and BSD.
+
+On the other hand, if any of your dependencies' licenses are "strong copyleft" (also gives public same permissions, subject to condition of using the same license downstream), then your project will have to use the same license. Common strong copyleft licenses include GPLv2, GPLv3, and AGPLv3.
+
+You may also want to consider the **communities** you hope will use and contribute to your project:
+
+* **Do you want your project to be used as a dependency by other projects?** Probably best to use the most popular license in your relevant community. For example, [MIT](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/) is the most popular license for [npm libraries](https://libraries.io/search?platforms=NPM).
+* **Do you want your project to appeal to large businesses?** A large business will likely want an express patent license from all contributors. In this case, [Apache 2.0](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/) has you (and them) covered.
+* **Do you want your project to appeal to contributors who do not want their contributions to be used in closed source software?** [GPLv3](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/gpl-3.0/) or (if they also do not wish to contribute to closed source services) [AGPLv3](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/agpl-3.0/) will go over well.
+
+Your **company** may have specific licensing requirements for its open source projects. For example, it may require a permissive license so that the company can use your project in the company's closed source product. Or your company may require a strong copyleft license and an additional contributor agreement (see below) so that only your company, and nobody else, can use your project in closed source software. Or your company may have certain needs related to standards, social responsibility, or transparency, any of which could require a particular licensing strategy. Talk to your [company's legal department](#what-does-my-companys-legal-team-need-to-know).
+
+When you create a new project on GitHub, you are given the option to select a license. Including one of the licenses mentioned above will make your GitHub project open source. If you'd like to see other options, check out [choosealicense.com](https://choosealicense.com) to find the right license for your project, even if it [isn't software](https://choosealicense.com/non-software/).
+
+## What if I want to change the license of my project?
+
+Most projects never need to change licenses. But occasionally circumstances change.
+
+For example, as your project grows it adds dependencies or users, or your company changes strategies, any of which could require or want a different license. Also, if you neglected to license your project from the start, adding a license is effectively the same as changing licenses. There are three fundamental things to consider when adding or changing your project's license:
+
+**It's complicated.** Determining license compatibility and compliance and who holds copyright can get complicated and confusing very quickly. Switching to a new but compatible license for new releases and contributions is different from relicensing all existing contributions. Involve your legal team at the first hint of any desire to change licenses. Even if you have or can obtain permission from your project's copyright holders for a license change, consider the impact of the change on your project's other users and contributors. Think of a license change as a "governance event" for your project that will more likely go smoothly with clear communications and consultation with your project's stakeholders. All the more reason to choose and use an appropriate license for your project from its inception!
+
+**Your project's existing license.** If your project's existing license is compatible with the license you want to change to, you could just start using the new license. That's because if license A is compatible with license B, you'll comply with the terms of A while complying with the terms of B (but not necessarily vice versa). So if you're currently using a permissive license (e.g., MIT), you could change to a license with more conditions, so long as you retain a copy of the MIT license and any associated copyright notices (i.e., continue to comply with the MIT license's minimal conditions). But if your current license is not permissive (e.g., copyleft, or you don't have a license) and you aren't the sole copyright holder, you couldn't just change your project's license to MIT. Essentially, with a permissive license the project's copyright holders have given permission in advance to change licenses.
+
+**Your project's existing copyright holders.** If you're the sole contributor to your project then either you or your company is the project's sole copyright holder. You can add or change to whatever license you or your company wants to. Otherwise there may be other copyright holders that you need agreement from in order to change licenses. Who are they? People who have commits in your project is a good place to start. But in some cases copyright will be held by those people's employers. In some cases people will have only made minimal contributions, but there's no hard and fast rule that contributions under some number of lines of code are not subject to copyright. What to do? It depends. For a relatively small and young project, it may be feasible to get all existing contributors to agree to a license change in an issue or pull request. For large and long-lived projects, you may have to seek out many contributors and even their heirs. Mozilla took years (2001-2006) to relicense Firefox, Thunderbird, and related software.
+
+Alternatively, you can have contributors agree in advance (via an additional contributor agreement -- see below) to certain license changes under certain conditions, beyond those allowed by your existing open source license. This shifts the complexity of changing licenses a bit. You'll need more help from your lawyers up front, and you'll still want to clearly communicate with your project's stakeholders when executing a license change.
+
+## Does my project need an additional contributor agreement?
+
+Probably not. For the vast majority of open source projects, an open source license implicitly serves as both the inbound (from contributors) and outbound (to other contributors and users) license. If your project is on GitHub, the GitHub Terms of Service make "inbound=outbound" the [explicit default](https://help.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-terms-of-service#6-contributions-under-repository-license).
+
+An additional contributor agreement -- often called a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) -- can create administrative work for project maintainers. How much work an agreement adds depends on the project and implementation. A simple agreement might require that contributors confirm, with a click, that they have the rights necessary to contribute under the project open source license. A more complicated agreement might require legal review and sign-off from contributors' employers.
+
+Also, by adding "paperwork" that some believe is unnecessary, hard to understand, or unfair (when the agreement recipient gets more rights than contributors or the public do via the project's open source license), an additional contributor agreement may be perceived as unfriendly to the project's community.
+
+
+
+ We have eliminated the CLA for Node.js. Doing this lowers the barrier to entry for Node.js contributors thereby broadening the contributor base.
+
+— @bcantrill, ["Broadening Node.js Contributions"](https://www.joyent.com/blog/broadening-node-js-contributions)
+
+
+
+Some situations where you may want to consider an additional contributor agreement for your project include:
+
+* Your lawyers want all contributors to expressly accept (_sign_, online or offline) contribution terms, perhaps because they feel the open source license itself is not enough (even though it is!). If this is the only concern, a contributor agreement that affirms the project's open source license should be enough. The [jQuery Individual Contributor License Agreement](https://contribute.jquery.org/CLA/) is a good example of a lightweight additional contributor agreement.
+* You or your lawyers want developers to represent that each commit they make is authorized. A [Developer Certificate of Origin](https://developercertificate.org/) requirement is how many projects achieve this. For example, the Node.js community [uses](https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/HEAD/CONTRIBUTING.md) the DCO [instead](https://nodejs.org/en/blog/uncategorized/notes-from-the-road/#easier-contribution) of their prior CLA. A simple option to automate enforcement of the DCO on your repository is the [DCO Probot](https://github.com/probot/dco).
+* Your project uses an open source license that does not include an express patent grant (such as MIT), and you need a patent grant from all contributors, some of whom may work for companies with large patent portfolios that could be used to target you or the project's other contributors and users. The [Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf) is a commonly used additional contributor agreement that has a patent grant mirroring the one found in the Apache License 2.0.
+* Your project is under a copyleft license, but you also need to distribute a proprietary version of the project. You'll need every contributor to assign copyright to you or grant you (but not the public) a permissive license. The [MongoDB Contributor Agreement](https://www.mongodb.com/legal/contributor-agreement) is an example this type of agreement.
+* You think your project might need to change licenses over its lifetime and want contributors to agree in advance to such changes.
+
+If you do need to use an additional contributor agreement with your project, consider using an integration such as [CLA assistant](https://github.com/cla-assistant/cla-assistant) to minimize contributor distraction.
+
+## What does my company's legal team need to know?
+
+If you're releasing an open source project as a company employee, first, your legal team should know that you're open sourcing a project.
+
+For better or worse, consider letting them know even if it's a personal project. You probably have an "employee IP agreement" with your company that gives them some control of your projects, especially if they are at all related to the company's business or you use any company resources to develop the project. Your company _should_ easily give you permission, and maybe already has through an employee-friendly IP agreement or a company policy. If not, you can negotiate (for example, explain that your project serves the company's professional learning and development objectives for you), or avoid working on your project until you find a better company.
+
+**If you're open sourcing a project for your company,** then definitely let them know. Your legal team probably already has policies for what open source license (and maybe additional contributor agreement) to use based on the company's business requirements and expertise around ensuring your project complies with the licenses of its dependencies. If not, you and they are in luck! Your legal team should be eager to work with you to figure this stuff out. Some things to think about:
+
+* **Third party material:** Does your project have dependencies created by others or otherwise include or use others' code? If these are open source, you'll need to comply with the materials' open source licenses. That starts with choosing a license that works with the third party open source licenses (see above). If your project modifies or distributes third party open source material, then your legal team will also want to know that you're meeting other conditions of the third party open source licenses such as retaining copyright notices. If your project uses others' code that doesn't have an open source license, you'll probably have to ask the third party maintainers to [add an open source license](https://choosealicense.com/no-license/#for-users), and if you can't get one, stop using their code in your project.
+
+* **Trade secrets:** Consider whether there is anything in the project that the company does not want to make available to the general public. If so, you could open source the rest of your project, after extracting the material you want to keep private.
+
+* **Patents:** Is your company applying for a patent of which open sourcing your project would constitute [public disclosure](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_disclosure)? Sadly, you might be asked to wait (or maybe the company will reconsider the wisdom of the application). If you're expecting contributions to your project from employees of companies with large patent portfolios, your legal team may want you to use a license with an express patent grant from contributors (such as Apache 2.0 or GPLv3), or an additional contributor agreement (see above).
+
+* **Trademarks:** Double check that your project's name [does not conflict with any existing trademarks](../starting-a-project/#avoiding-name-conflicts). If you use your own company trademarks in the project, check that it does not cause any conflicts. [FOSSmarks](http://fossmarks.org/) is a practical guide to understanding trademarks in the context of free and open source projects.
+
+* **Privacy:** Does your project collect data on users? "Phone home" to company servers? Your legal team can help you comply with company policies and external regulations.
+
+If you're releasing your company's first open source project, the above is more than enough to get through (but don't worry, most projects shouldn't raise any major concerns).
+
+Longer term, your legal team can do more to help the company get more from its involvement in open source, and stay safe:
+
+* **Employee contribution policies:** Consider developing a corporate policy that specifies how your employees contribute to open source projects. A clear policy will reduce confusion among your employees and help them contribute to open source projects in the company's best interest, whether as part of their jobs or in their free time. A good example is Rackspace's [Model IP and Open Source Contribution Policy](https://processmechanics.com/2015/07/22/a-model-ip-and-open-source-contribution-policy/).
+
+
+
+ Letting out the IP associated with a patch builds the employee's knowledge base and reputation. It shows that the company is invested in the development of that employee and creates a sense of empowerment and autonomy. All of these benefits also lead to higher morale and better employee retention.
+
+— @vanl, ["A Model IP and Open Source Contribution Policy"](https://processmechanics.com/2015/07/22/a-model-ip-and-open-source-contribution-policy/)
+
+
+
+* **What to release:** [(Almost) everything?](http://tom.preston-werner.com/2011/11/22/open-source-everything.html) If your legal team understands and is invested in your company's open source strategy, they'll be best able to help rather than hinder your efforts.
+* **Compliance:** Even if your company doesn't release any open source projects, it uses others' open source software. [Awareness and process](https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/2015/06/why-companies-that-use-open-source-need-a-compliance-program/) can prevent headaches, product delays, and lawsuits.
+
+
+ Organizations must have a license and compliance strategy in place that fits both \["permissive" and "copyleft"\] categories. This begins with keeping a record of the licensing terms that apply to the open source software you’re using — including subcomponents and dependencies.
+
+— Heather Meeker, ["Open Source Software: Compliance Basics And Best Practices"](https://techcrunch.com/2012/12/14/open-source-software-compliance-basics-and-best-practices/)
+
+
+
+* **Patents:** Your company may wish to join the [Open Invention Network](https://www.openinventionnetwork.com/), a shared defensive patent pool to protect members' use of major open source projects, or explore other [alternative patent licensing](https://www.eff.org/document/hacking-patent-system-2016).
+* **Governance:** Especially if and when it makes sense to move a project to a [legal entity outside of the company](../leadership-and-governance/#do-i-need-a-legal-entity-to-support-my-project).
diff --git a/_articles/nl/metrics.md b/_articles/nl/metrics.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..60a2a72d703
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_articles/nl/metrics.md
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+---
+lang: nl
+title: Open Source Metrics
+description: Make informed decisions to help your open source project thrive by measuring and tracking its success.
+class: metrics
+toc:
+ why-measure-anything: "Why measure anything?"
+ discovery: "Discovery"
+ usage: "Usage"
+ retention: "Retention"
+ maintainer-activity: "Maintainer activity"
+order: 9
+image: /assets/images/cards/metrics.png
+related:
+ - finding
+ - best-practices
+---
+
+## Why measure anything?
+
+Data, when used wisely, can help you make better decisions as an open source maintainer.
+
+With more information, you can:
+
+* Understand how users respond to a new feature
+* Figure out where new users come from
+* Identify, and decide whether to support, an outlier use case or functionality
+* Quantify your project's popularity
+* Understand how your project is used
+* Raise money through sponsorships and grants
+
+For example, [Homebrew](https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/blob/bbed7246bc5c5b7acb8c1d427d10b43e090dfd39/docs/Analytics.md) finds that Google Analytics helps them prioritize work:
+
+> Homebrew is provided free of charge and run entirely by volunteers in their spare time. As a result, we do not have the resources to do detailed user studies of Homebrew users to decide on how best to design future features and prioritise current work. Anonymous aggregate user analytics allow us to prioritise fixes and features based on how, where and when people use Homebrew.
+
+Popularity isn't everything. Everybody gets into open source for different reasons. If your goal as an open source maintainer is to show off your work, be transparent about your code, or just have fun, metrics may not be important to you.
+
+If you _are_ interested in understanding your project on a deeper level, read on for ways to analyze your project's activity.
+
+## Discovery
+
+Before anybody can use or contribute back to your project, they need to know it exists. Ask yourself: _are people finding this project?_
+
+![Traffic graph](/assets/images/metrics/repo_traffic_graphs_tooltip.png)
+
+If your project is hosted on GitHub, [you can view](https://help.github.com/articles/about-repository-graphs/#traffic) how many people land on your project and where they come from. From your project's page, click "Insights", then "Traffic". On this page, you can see:
+
+* **Total page views:** Tells you how many times your project was viewed
+
+* **Total unique visitors:** Tells you how many people viewed your project
+
+* **Referring sites:** Tells you where visitors came from. This metric can help you figure out where to reach your audience and whether your promotion efforts are working.
+
+* **Popular content:** Tells you where visitors go on your project, broken down by page views and unique visitors.
+
+[GitHub stars](https://help.github.com/articles/about-stars/) can also help provide a baseline measure of popularity. While GitHub stars don't necessarily correlate to downloads and usage, they can tell you how many people are taking notice of your work.
+
+You may also want to [track discoverability in specific places](https://opensource.com/business/16/6/pirate-metrics): for example, Google PageRank, referral traffic from your project's website, or referrals from other open source projects or websites.
+
+## Usage
+
+People are finding your project on this wild and crazy thing we call the internet. Ideally, when they see your project, they'll feel compelled to do something. The second question you'll want to ask is: _are people using this project?_
+
+If you use a package manager, such as npm or RubyGems.org, to distribute your project, you may be able to track your project's downloads.
+
+Each package manager may use a slightly different definition of "download", and downloads do not necessarily correlate to installs or use, but it provides some baseline for comparison. Try using [Libraries.io](https://libraries.io/) to track usage statistics across many popular package managers.
+
+If your project is on GitHub, navigate again to the "Traffic" page. You can use the [clone graph](https://github.com/blog/1873-clone-graphs) to see how many times your project has been cloned on a given day, broken down by total clones and unique cloners.
+
+![Clone graph](/assets/images/metrics/clone_graph.png)
+
+If usage is low compared to the number of people discovering your project, there are two issues to consider. Either:
+
+* Your project isn't successfully converting your audience, or
+* You're attracting the wrong audience
+
+For example, if your project lands on the front page of Hacker News, you'll probably see a spike in discovery (traffic), but a lower conversion rate, because you're reaching everyone on Hacker News. If your Ruby project is featured at a Ruby conference, however, you're more likely to see a high conversion rate from a targeted audience.
+
+Try to figure out where your audience is coming from and ask others for feedback on your project page to figure out which of these two issues you're facing.
+
+Once you know that people are using your project, you might want to try to figure out what they are doing with it. Are they building on it by forking your code and adding features? Are they using it for science or business?
+
+## Retention
+
+People are finding your project and they're using it. The next question you'll want to ask yourself is: _are people contributing back to this project?_
+
+It's never too early to start thinking about contributors. Without other people pitching in, you risk putting yourself into an unhealthy situation where your project is _popular_ (many people use it) but not _supported_ (not enough maintainer time to meet demand).
+
+Retention also requires an [inflow of new contributors](http://blog.abigailcabunoc.com/increasing-developer-engagement-at-mozilla-science-learning-advocacy#contributor-pathways_2), as previously active contributors will eventually move on to other things.
+
+Examples of community metrics that you may want to regularly track include:
+
+* **Total contributor count and number of commits per contributor:** Tells you how many contributors you have, and who's more or less active. On GitHub, you can view this under "Insights" -> "Contributors." Right now, this graph only counts contributors who have committed to the default branch of the repository.
+
+![Contributor graph](/assets/images/metrics/repo_contributors_specific_graph.png)
+
+* **First time, casual, and repeat contributors:** Helps you track whether you're getting new contributors, and whether they come back. (Casual contributors are contributors with a low number of commits. Whether that's one commit, less than five commits, or something else is up to you.) Without new contributors, your project's community can become stagnant.
+
+* **Number of open issues and open pull requests:** If these numbers get too high, you might need help with issue triaging and code reviews.
+
+* **Number of _opened_ issues and _opened_ pull requests:** Opened issues means somebody cares enough about your project to open an issue. If that number increases over time, it suggests people are interested in your project.
+
+* **Types of contributions:** For example, commits, fixing typos or bugs, or commenting on an issue.
+
+
+
+ Open source is more than just code. Successful open source projects include code and documentation contributions together with conversations about these changes.
+
+— @arfon, ["The Shape of Open Source"](https://github.com/blog/2195-the-shape-of-open-source)
+
+
+
+## Maintainer activity
+
+Finally, you'll want to close the loop by making sure your project's maintainers are able to handle the volume of contributions received. The last question you'll want to ask yourself is: _am I (or are we) responding to our community?_
+
+Unresponsive maintainers become a bottleneck for open source projects. If someone submits a contribution but never hears back from a maintainer, they may feel discouraged and leave.
+
+[Research from Mozilla](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1hsJLv1ieSqtXBzd5YZusY-mB8e1VJzaeOmh8Q4VeMio/edit#slide=id.g43d857af8_0177) suggests that maintainer responsiveness is a critical factor in encouraging repeat contributions.
+
+Consider tracking how long it takes for you (or another maintainer) to respond to contributions, whether an issue or a pull request. Responding doesn't require taking action. It can be as simple as saying: _"Thanks for your submission! I'll review this within the next week."_
+
+You could also measure the time it takes to move between stages in the contribution process, such as:
+
+* Average time an issue remains open
+* Whether issues get closed by PRs
+* Whether stale issues get closed
+* Average time to merge a pull request
+
+## Use 📊 to learn about people
+
+Understanding metrics will help you build an active, growing open source project. Even if you don't track every metric on a dashboard, use the framework above to focus your attention on the type of behavior that will help your project thrive.
diff --git a/_articles/nl/starting-a-project.md b/_articles/nl/starting-a-project.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b7502bc5744
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_articles/nl/starting-a-project.md
@@ -0,0 +1,362 @@
+---
+lang: nl
+title: Starting an Open Source Project
+description: Learn more about the world of open source and get ready to launch your own project.
+class: beginners
+toc:
+ the-what-and-why-of-open-source: "The what and why of open source"
+ should-i-launch-my-own-open-source-project: "Should I launch my own open source project?"
+ launching-your-own-open-source-project: "Launching your own open source project"
+ naming-and-branding-your-project: "Naming and branding your project"
+ your-pre-launch-checklist: "Your pre-launch checklist"
+order: 2
+image: /assets/images/cards/beginner.png
+related:
+ - finding
+ - building
+---
+
+## The "what" and "why" of open source
+
+So you're thinking about getting started with open source? Congratulations! The world appreciates your contribution. Let's talk about what open source is and why people do it.
+
+### What does "open source" mean?
+
+When a project is open source, that means **anybody is free to use, study, modify, and distribute your project for any purpose.** These permissions are enforced through [an open source license](https://opensource.org/licenses).
+
+Open source is powerful because it lowers the barriers to adoption and collaboration, allowing people to spread and improve projects quickly. Also because it gives users a potential to control their own computing, relative to closed source. For example, a business using open source software has the option to hire someone to make custom improvements to the software, rather than relying exclusively on a closed source vendor's product decisions.
+
+_Free software_ refers to the same set of projects as _open source_. Sometimes you'll also see [these terms](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_and_open-source_software) combined as "free and open source software" (FOSS) or "free, libre, and open source software" (FLOSS). _Free_ and _libre_ refer to freedom, [not price](#does-open-source-mean-free-of-charge).
+
+### Why do people open source their work?
+
+
+
+ One of the most rewarding experiences I get out of using and collaborating on open source comes from the relationships that I build with other developers facing many of the same problems I am.
+
+— @kentcdodds, ["How getting into Open Source has been awesome for me"](https://kentcdodds.com/blog/how-getting-into-open-source-has-been-awesome-for-me)
+
+
+
+[There are many reasons](https://ben.balter.com/2015/11/23/why-open-source/) why a person or organization would want to open source a project. Some examples include:
+
+* **Collaboration:** Open source projects can accept changes from anybody in the world. [Exercism](https://github.com/exercism/), for example, is a programming exercise platform with over 350 contributors.
+
+* **Adoption and remixing:** Open source projects can be used by anyone for nearly any purpose. People can even use it to build other things. [WordPress](https://github.com/WordPress), for example, started as a fork of an existing project called [b2](https://github.com/WordPress/book/blob/HEAD/Content/Part%201/2-b2-cafelog.md).
+
+* **Transparency:** Anyone can inspect an open source project for errors or inconsistencies. Transparency matters to governments like [Bulgaria](https://medium.com/@bozhobg/bulgaria-got-a-law-requiring-open-source-98bf626cf70a) or the [United States](https://sourcecode.cio.gov/), regulated industries like banking or healthcare, and security software like [Let's Encrypt](https://github.com/letsencrypt).
+
+Open source isn't just for software, either. You can open source everything from data sets to books. Check out [GitHub Explore](https://github.com/explore) for ideas on what else you can open source.
+
+### Does open source mean "free of charge"?
+
+One of open source's biggest draws is that it does not cost money. "Free of charge", however, is a byproduct of open source's overall value.
+
+Because [an open source license requires](https://opensource.org/osd-annotated) that anyone can use, modify, and share your project for nearly any purpose, projects themselves tend to be free of charge. If the project cost money to use, anyone could legally make a copy and use the free version instead.
+
+As a result, most open source projects are free, but "free of charge" is not part of the open source definition. There are ways to charge for open source projects indirectly through dual licensing or limited features, while still complying with the official definition of open source.
+
+## Should I launch my own open source project?
+
+The short answer is yes, because no matter the outcome, launching your own project is a great way to learn how open source works.
+
+If you've never open sourced a project before, you might be nervous about what people will say, or whether anyone will notice at all. If this sounds like you, you're not alone!
+
+Open source work is like any other creative activity, whether it's writing or painting. It can feel scary to share your work with the world, but the only way to get better is to practice - even if you don't have an audience.
+
+If you're not yet convinced, take a moment to think about what your goals might be.
+
+### Setting your goals
+
+Goals can help you figure out what to work on, what to say no to, and where you need help from others. Start by asking yourself, _why am I open sourcing this project?_
+
+There is no one right answer to this question. You may have multiple goals for a single project, or different projects with different goals.
+
+If your only goal is to show off your work, you may not even want contributions, and even say so in your README. On the other hand, if you do want contributors, you'll invest time into clear documentation and making newcomers feel welcome.
+
+
+
+ At some point I created a custom UIAlertView that I was using...and I decided to make it open source. So I modified it to be more dynamic and uploaded it to GitHub. I also wrote my first documentation explaining to other developers how to use it on their projects. Probably nobody ever used it because it was a simple project but I was feeling good about my contribution.
+
+— @mavris, ["Self-taught Software Developers: Why Open Source is important to us"](https://medium.com/rocknnull/self-taught-software-engineers-why-open-source-is-important-to-us-fe2a3473a576)
+
+
+
+As your project grows, your community may need more than just code from you. Responding to issues, reviewing code, and evangelizing your project are all important tasks in an open source project.
+
+While the amount of time you spend on non-coding tasks will depend on the size and scope of your project, you should be prepared as a maintainer to address them yourself or find someone to help you.
+
+**If you're part of a company open sourcing a project,** make sure your project has the internal resources it needs to thrive. You'll want to identify who's responsible for maintaining the project after launch, and how you'll share those tasks with your community.
+
+If you need a dedicated budget or staffing for promotion, operations and maintaining the project, start those conversations early.
+
+
+
+ As you begin to open source the project, it's important to make sure that your management processes take into consideration the contributions and abilities of the community around your project. Don't be afraid to involve contributors who are not employed in your business in key aspects of the project — especially if they are frequent contributors.
+
+— @captainsafia, ["So you wanna open source a project, eh?"](https://dev.to/captainsafia/so-you-wanna-open-source-a-project-eh-5779)
+
+
+
+### Contributing to other projects
+
+If your goal is to learn how to collaborate with others or understand how open source works, consider contributing to an existing project. Start with a project that you already use and love. Contributing to a project can be as simple as fixing typos or updating documentation.
+
+If you're not sure how to get started as a contributor, check out our [How to Contribute to Open Source guide](../how-to-contribute/).
+
+## Launching your own open source project
+
+There is no perfect time to open source your work. You can open source an idea, a work in progress, or after years of being closed source.
+
+Generally speaking, you should open source your project when you feel comfortable having others view, and give feedback on, your work.
+
+No matter which stage you decide to open source your project, every project should include the following documentation:
+
+* [Open source license](https://help.github.com/articles/open-source-licensing/#where-does-the-license-live-on-my-repository)
+* [README](https://help.github.com/articles/create-a-repo/#commit-your-first-change)
+* [Contributing guidelines](https://help.github.com/articles/setting-guidelines-for-repository-contributors/)
+* [Code of conduct](../code-of-conduct/)
+
+As a maintainer, these components will help you communicate expectations, manage contributions, and protect everyone's legal rights (including your own). They significantly increase your chances of having a positive experience.
+
+If your project is on GitHub, putting these files in your root directory with the recommended filenames will help GitHub recognize and automatically surface them to your readers.
+
+### Choosing a license
+
+An open source license guarantees that others can use, copy, modify, and contribute back to your project without repercussions. It also protects you from sticky legal situations. **You must include a license when you launch an open source project.**
+
+Legal work is no fun. The good news is that you can copy and paste an existing license into your repository. It will only take a minute to protect your hard work.
+
+[MIT](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/), [Apache 2.0](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/), and [GPLv3](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/gpl-3.0/) are the most popular open source licenses, but [there are other options](https://choosealicense.com) to choose from.
+
+When you create a new project on GitHub, you are given the option to select a license. Including an open source license will make your GitHub project open source.
+
+![Pick a license](/assets/images/starting-a-project/repository-license-picker.png)
+
+If you have other questions or concerns around the legal aspects of managing an open source project, [we've got you covered](../legal/).
+
+### Writing a README
+
+READMEs do more than explain how to use your project. They also explain why your project matters, and what your users can do with it.
+
+In your README, try to answer the following questions:
+
+* What does this project do?
+* Why is this project useful?
+* How do I get started?
+* Where can I get more help, if I need it?
+
+You can use your README to answer other questions, like how you handle contributions, what the goals of the project are, and information about licenses and attribution. If you don't want to accept contributions, or your project is not yet ready for production, write this information down.
+
+
+
+ Better documentation means more users, less support requests, and more contributors. (...) Remember that your readers aren't you. There are people who might come to a project who have completely different experiences.
+
+— @tracymakes, ["Writing So Your Words Are Read (video)"](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LiV759Bje0&list=PLmV2D6sIiX3U03qc-FPXgLFGFkccCEtfv&index=10)
+
+
+
+Sometimes, people avoid writing a README because they feel like the project is unfinished, or they don't want contributions. These are all very good reasons to write one.
+
+For more inspiration, try using @dguo's ["Make a README" guide](https://www.makeareadme.com/) or @PurpleBooth's [README template](https://gist.github.com/PurpleBooth/109311bb0361f32d87a2) to write a complete README.
+
+When you include a README file in the root directory, GitHub will automatically display it on the repository homepage.
+
+### Writing your contributing guidelines
+
+A CONTRIBUTING file tells your audience how to participate in your project. For example, you might include information on:
+
+* How to file a bug report (try using [issue and pull request templates](https://github.com/blog/2111-issue-and-pull-request-templates))
+* How to suggest a new feature
+* How to set up your environment and run tests
+
+In addition to technical details, a CONTRIBUTING file is an opportunity to communicate your expectations for contributions, such as:
+
+* The types of contributions you're looking for
+* Your roadmap or vision for the project
+* How contributors should (or should not) get in touch with you
+
+Using a warm, friendly tone and offering specific suggestions for contributions (such as writing documentation, or making a website) can go a long way in making newcomers feel welcomed and excited to participate.
+
+For example, [Active Admin](https://github.com/activeadmin/activeadmin/) starts [its contributing guide](https://github.com/activeadmin/activeadmin/blob/HEAD/CONTRIBUTING.md) with:
+
+> First off, thank you for considering contributing to Active Admin. It's people like you that make Active Admin such a great tool.
+
+In the earliest stages of your project, your CONTRIBUTING file can be simple. You should always explain how to report bugs or file issues, and any technical requirements (like tests) to make a contribution.
+
+Over time, you might add other frequently asked questions to your CONTRIBUTING file. Writing down this information means fewer people will ask you the same questions over and over again.
+
+For more help with writing your CONTRIBUTING file, check out @nayafia's [contributing guide template](https://github.com/nayafia/contributing-template/blob/HEAD/CONTRIBUTING-template.md) or @mozilla's ["How to Build a CONTRIBUTING.md"](https://mozillascience.github.io/working-open-workshop/contributing/).
+
+Link to your CONTRIBUTING file from your README, so more people see it. If you [place the CONTRIBUTING file in your project's repository](https://help.github.com/articles/setting-guidelines-for-repository-contributors/), GitHub will automatically link to your file when a contributor creates an issue or opens a pull request.
+
+![Contributing guidelines](/assets/images/starting-a-project/Contributing-guidelines.jpg)
+
+### Establishing a code of conduct
+
+
+
+ We’ve all had experiences where we faced what was probably abuse either as a maintainer trying to explain why something had to be a certain way, or as a user...asking a simple question. (...) A code of conduct becomes an easily referenced and linkable document that indicates that your team takes constructive discourse very seriously.
+
+— @mlynch, ["Making Open Source a Happier Place"](https://medium.com/ionic-and-the-mobile-web/making-open-source-a-happier-place-3b90d254f5f)
+
+
+
+Finally, a code of conduct helps set ground rules for behavior for your project's participants. This is especially valuable if you're launching an open source project for a community or company. A code of conduct empowers you to facilitate healthy, constructive community behavior, which will reduce your stress as a maintainer.
+
+For more information, check out our [Code of Conduct guide](../code-of-conduct/).
+
+In addition to communicating _how_ you expect participants to behave, a code of conduct also tends to describe who these expectations apply to, when they apply, and what to do if a violation occurs.
+
+Much like open source licenses, there are also emerging standards for codes of conduct, so you don't have to write your own. The [Contributor Covenant](https://contributor-covenant.org/) is a drop-in code of conduct that is used by [over 40,000 open source projects](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/adopters), including Kubernetes, Rails, and Swift. No matter which text you use, you should be prepared to enforce your code of conduct when necessary.
+
+Paste the text directly into a CODE_OF_CONDUCT file in your repository. Keep the file in your project's root directory so it's easy to find, and link to it from your README.
+
+## Naming and branding your project
+
+Branding is more than a flashy logo or catchy project name. It's about how you talk about your project, and who you reach with your message.
+
+### Choosing the right name
+
+Pick a name that is easy to remember and, ideally, gives some idea of what the project does. For example:
+
+* [Sentry](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry) monitors apps for crash reporting
+* [Thin](https://github.com/macournoyer/thin) is a fast and simple Ruby web server
+
+If you're building upon an existing project, using their name as a prefix can help clarify what your project does (for example, [node-fetch](https://github.com/bitinn/node-fetch) brings `window.fetch` to Node.js).
+
+Consider clarity above all. Puns are fun, but remember that some jokes might not translate to other cultures or people with different experiences from you. Some of your potential users might be company employees: you don't want to make them uncomfortable when they have to explain your project at work!
+
+### Avoiding name conflicts
+
+[Check for open source projects with a similar name](http://ivantomic.com/projects/ospnc/), especially if you share the same language or ecosystem. If your name overlaps with a popular existing project, you might confuse your audience.
+
+If you want a website, Twitter handle, or other properties to represent your project, make sure you can get the names you want. Ideally, [reserve those names now](https://instantdomainsearch.com/) for peace of mind, even if you don't intend to use them just yet.
+
+Make sure that your project's name doesn't infringe upon any trademarks. A company might ask you to take down your project later on, or even take legal action against you. It's just not worth the risk.
+
+You can check the [WIPO Global Brand Database](http://www.wipo.int/branddb/en/) for trademark conflicts. If you're at a company, this is one of the things your [legal team can help you with](../legal/).
+
+Finally, do a quick Google search for your project name. Will people be able to easily find your project? Does something else appear in the search results that you wouldn't want them to see?
+
+### How you write (and code) affects your brand, too!
+
+Throughout the life of your project, you'll do a lot of writing: READMEs, tutorials, community documents, responding to issues, maybe even newsletters and mailing lists.
+
+Whether it's official documentation or a casual email, your writing style is part of your project's brand. Consider how you might come across to your audience and whether that is the tone you wish to convey.
+
+
+
+ I tried to be involved with every thread on the mailing list, and showing exemplary behaviour, being nice to people, taking their issues seriously and trying to be helpful overall. After a while, people stuck around not to only ask questions, but to help with the answering as well, and to my complete delight, they mimicked my style.
+
+— @janl on [CouchDB](https://github.com/apache/couchdb), ["Sustainable Open Source"](https://writing.jan.io/2015/11/20/sustainable-open-source.html)
+
+
+
+Using warm, inclusive language (such as "them", even when referring to the single person) can go a long way in making your project feel welcoming to new contributors. Stick to simple language, as many of your readers may not be native English speakers.
+
+Beyond how you write words, your coding style may also become part of your project's brand. [Angular](https://angular.io/guide/styleguide) and [jQuery](https://contribute.jquery.org/style-guide/js/) are two examples of projects with rigorous coding styles and guidelines.
+
+It isn't necessary to write a style guide for your project when you're just starting out, and you may find that you enjoy incorporating different coding styles into your project anyway. But you should anticipate how your writing and coding style might attract or discourage different types of people. The earliest stages of your project are your opportunity to set the precedent you wish to see.
+
+## Your pre-launch checklist
+
+Ready to open source your project? Here's a checklist to help. Check all the boxes? You're ready to go! [Click "publish"](https://help.github.com/articles/making-a-private-repository-public/) and pat yourself on the back.
+
+**Documentation**
+
+
+
+
+ Project has a LICENSE file with an open source license
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Project has basic documentation (README, CONTRIBUTING, CODE_OF_CONDUCT)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ The name is easy to remember, gives some idea of what the project does, and does not conflict with an existing project or infringe on trademarks
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ The issue queue is up-to-date, with issues clearly organized and labeled
+
+
+
+**Code**
+
+
+
+
+ Project uses consistent code conventions and clear function/method/variable names
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ The code is clearly commented, documenting intentions and edge cases
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ There are no sensitive materials in the revision history, issues, or pull requests (for example, passwords or other non-public information)
+
+
+
+**People**
+
+If you're an individual:
+
+
+
+
+ You've talked to the legal department and/or understand the IP and open source policies of your company (if you're an employee somewhere)
+
+
+
+If you're a company or organization:
+
+
+
+
+ You've talked to your legal department
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ You have a marketing plan for announcing and promoting the project
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Someone is committed to managing community interactions (responding to issues, reviewing and merging pull requests)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ At least two people have administrative access to the project
+
+
+
+## You did it!
+
+Congratulations on open sourcing your first project. No matter the outcome, working in public is a gift to the community. With every commit, comment, and pull request, you're creating opportunities for yourself and for others to learn and grow.
From 4e783d1cbfbd58dbcdf4e6d2a802339b5afd2549 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley de Groot
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 21:09:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 059/749] First steps for best-practices.md
---
_articles/nl/best-practices.md | 93 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
_articles/nl/index.html | 6 +++
_articles/nl/index.min.html | 1 +
3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 _articles/nl/index.html
create mode 100644 _articles/nl/index.min.html
diff --git a/_articles/nl/best-practices.md b/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
index a6ab4e409e3..b9a73350e0d 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
---
lang: nl
-title: Best Practices for Maintainers
-description: Making your life easier as an open source maintainer, from documenting processes to leveraging your community.
+title: Tips voor open source-beheerder
+description: Uw leven gemakkelijker maken als open source-beheerder, van het documenteren van processen tot het benutten van uw gemeenschap.
class: best-practices
toc:
- what-does-it-mean-to-be-a-maintainer: "What does it mean to be a maintainer?"
- documenting-your-processes: "Documenting your processes"
- learning-to-say-no: "Learning to say no"
- leverage-your-community: "Leverage your community"
- bring-in-the-robots: "Bring in the robots"
- its-okay-to-hit-pause: "It’s okay to hit pause"
+ what-does-it-mean-to-be-a-maintainer: "Wat betekent het om een open source-onderhouder te zijn?"
+ documenting-your-processes: "Documenteren van uw processen"
+ learning-to-say-no: "Nee leren zeggen"
+ leverage-your-community: "Maak gebruik van uw community"
+ bring-in-the-robots: "Breng de robots"
+ its-okay-to-hit-pause: "Het is oké om op pauze te drukken"
order: 5
image: /assets/images/cards/best-practices.png
related:
@@ -17,72 +17,75 @@ related:
- leadership
---
-## What does it mean to be a maintainer?
+## Wat betekent het om een open source-onderhouder te zijn?
-If you maintain an open source project that a lot of people use, you may have noticed you're coding less and responding to issues more.
+Als je een open source-project onderhoudt dat veel mensen gebruiken, heb je misschien gemerkt dat je minder codeert en meer op problemen reageert.
-In the early stages of a project, you're experimenting with new ideas and making decisions based on what you want. As your project increases in popularity, you'll find yourself working with your users and contributors more.
+In de vroege stadia van een project experimenteer je met nieuwe ideeën en neem je beslissingen op basis van wat je wilt. Naarmate uw project populairder wordt, zult u merken dat u meer met uw gebruikers en bijdragers samenwerkt.
-Maintaining a project requires more than code. These tasks are often unexpected, but they're just as important to a growing project. We've gathered a few ways to make your life easier, from documenting processes to leveraging your community.
+Voor het onderhouden van een project is meer nodig dan alleen code. Deze taken zijn vaak onverwacht, maar net zo belangrijk voor een groeiend project. We hebben een aantal manieren verzameld om uw leven gemakkelijker te maken, van het documenteren van processen tot het benutten van uw gemeenschap.
-## Documenting your processes
+## Documenteren van uw processen
-Writing things down is one of the most important things you can do as a maintainer.
+Dingen documenteren is een van de belangrijkste dingen die u als onderhouder kunt doen.
-Documentation not only clarifies your own thinking, but it helps other people understand what you need or expect, before they even ask.
+Documentatie verduidelijkt niet alleen uw eigen denken, maar het helpt andere mensen ook te begrijpen wat u nodig heeft of verwacht, nog voordat ze erom vragen.
-Writing things down makes it easier to say no when something doesn't fit into your scope. It also makes it easier for people to pitch in and help. You never know who might be reading or using your project.
+Door dingen op te schrijven, wordt het gemakkelijker om nee te zeggen als iets niet binnen uw bereik past. Het maakt het ook gemakkelijker voor mensen om in te springen en te helpen. Je weet nooit wie je project leest of gebruikt.
-Even if you don't use full paragraphs, jotting down bullet points is better than not writing at all.
+Zelfs als u geen volledige alinea's gebruikt, is het beter om opsommingstekens op te schrijven dan helemaal niet te documenteren.
-Remember to keep your documentation up-to-date. If you're not able to always do this, delete your outdated documentation or indicate it is outdated so contributors know updates are welcome.
+Denk eraan om uw documentatie up-to-date te houden. Als u dit niet altijd kunt doen, verwijdert u uw verouderde documentatie of geeft u aan dat deze verouderd is, zodat bijdragers weten dat updates welkom zijn.
-### Write down your project's vision
+### Schrijf de visie van uw project op
-Start by writing down the goals of your project. Add them to your README, or create a separate file called VISION. If there are other artifacts that could help, like a project roadmap, make those public as well.
+Begin met het opschrijven van de doelen van uw project. Voeg ze toe aan je README, of maak een apart bestand met de naam VISION. Als er andere artefacten zijn die kunnen helpen, zoals een projectroadmap, maak die dan ook openbaar.
-Having a clear, documented vision keeps you focused and helps you avoid "scope creep" from others' contributions.
+Door een duidelijke, gedocumenteerde visie te hebben, blijft u gefocust en kunt u voorkomen dat u "scoop" van andermans bijdragen krijgt.
-For example, @lord discovered that having a project vision helped him figure out which requests to spend time on. As a new maintainer, he regretted not sticking to his project's scope when he got his first feature request for [Slate](https://github.com/lord/slate).
+@Lord ontdekte bijvoorbeeld dat het hebben van een projectvisie hem hielp uitzoeken aan welke verzoeken hij tijd moest besteden. Als nieuwe open source-onderhouder had hij er spijt van dat hij zich niet aan de reikwijdte van zijn project had gehouden toen hij zijn eerste functieverzoek kreeg voor [Slate](https://github.com/lord/slate).
- I fumbled it. I didn't put in the effort to come up with a complete solution. Instead of an half-assed solution, I wish I had said "I don't have time for this right now, but I'll add it to the long term nice-to-have list."
+Ik heb het gerommeld. Ik heb niet de moeite genomen om met een complete oplossing te komen. In plaats van een halfslachtige oplossing, zou ik willen dat ik had gezegd: "Ik heb hier momenteel geen tijd voor, maar ik zal het toevoegen aan de lange termijn lijst met leuke dingen."
+
+_I fumbled it. I didn't put in the effort to come up with a complete solution. Instead of an half-assed solution, I wish I had said "I don't have time for this right now, but I'll add it to the long term nice-to-have list."_
+
— @lord, ["Tips for new open source maintainers"](https://lord.io/blog/2014/oss-tips/)
-### Communicate your expectations
-
-Rules can be nerve-wracking to write down. Sometimes you might feel like you're policing other people's behavior or killing all the fun.
-
-Written and enforced fairly, however, good rules empower maintainers. They prevent you from getting dragged into doing things you don't want to do.
+### Communiceer uw verwachtingen
-Most people who come across your project don't know anything about you or your circumstances. They may assume you get paid to work on it, especially if it's something they regularly use and depend on. Maybe at one point you put a lot of time into your project, but now you're busy with a new job or family member.
+Regels kunnen zenuwslopend zijn om op te schrijven. Soms heb je misschien het gevoel dat je het gedrag van andere mensen controleert of al het plezier wegneemt.
-All of this is perfectly okay! Just make sure other people know about it.
+Eerlijk geschreven en gehandhaafd, maar goede regels geven open soruce-onderhouders meer mogelijkheden. Ze voorkomen dat u wordt meegesleurd in dingen die u niet wilt doen.
+
+De meeste mensen die uw project tegenkomen, weten niets over u of uw omstandigheden. Ze gaan er misschien van uit dat je wordt betaald om eraan te werken, vooral als het iets is dat ze regelmatig gebruiken en waarvan ze afhankelijk zijn. Misschien heb je op een gegeven moment veel tijd in je project gestoken, maar ben je nu bezig met een nieuwe baan of familielid.
-If maintaining your project is part-time or purely volunteered, be honest about how much time you have. This is not the same as how much time you think the project requires, or how much time others want you to spend.
+Dit is allemaal in orde! Zorg ervoor dat andere mensen ervan op de hoogte zijn.
-Here are a few rules that are worth writing down:
+Als het onderhouden van uw project parttime of puur vrijwillig is, wees dan eerlijk over hoeveel tijd u hebt. Dit is niet hetzelfde als hoeveel tijd u denkt dat het project nodig heeft, of hoeveel tijd anderen willen dat u eraan besteedt.
-* How a contribution is reviewed and accepted (_Do they need tests? An issue template?_)
-* The types of contributions you'll accept (_Do you only want help with a certain part of your code?_)
-* When it's appropriate to follow up (_for example, "You can expect a response from a maintainer within 7 days. If you haven't heard anything by then, feel free to ping the thread."_)
-* How much time you spend on the project (_for example, "We only spend about 5 hours per week on this project"_)
+Hier zijn een paar regels die het waard zijn om op te schrijven:
-[Jekyll](https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll/tree/master/docs), [CocoaPods](https://github.com/CocoaPods/CocoaPods/wiki/Communication-&-Design-Rules), and [Homebrew](https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/blob/bbed7246bc5c5b7acb8c1d427d10b43e090dfd39/docs/Maintainers-Avoiding-Burnout.md) are several examples of projects with ground rules for maintainers and contributors.
+* Hoe een bijdrage wordt beoordeeld en geaccepteerd (_Hebben ze tests nodig? Een issue-sjabloon? _)
+* De soorten bijdragen die je accepteert (_Wil je alleen hulp bij een bepaald deel van je code? _)
+* Wanneer het gepast is om op te volgen (_bijvoorbeeld: "U kunt binnen 7 dagen een reactie van een onderhouder verwachten. Als u tegen die tijd niets heeft gehoord, kunt u de discussie pingen." _)
+* Hoeveel tijd u aan het project besteedt (_bijvoorbeeld: "We besteden slechts ongeveer 5 uur per week aan dit project" _)
-### Keep communication public
+[Jekyll](https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll/tree/master/docs), [CocoaPods](https://github.com/CocoaPods/CocoaPods/wiki/Communication-&-Design-Rules), en [Homebrew](https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/blob/bbed7246bc5c5b7acb8c1d427d10b43e090dfd39/docs/Maintainers-Avoiding-Burnout.md) zijn verschillende voorbeelden van projecten met basisregels voor beheerders en bijdragers.
-Don't forget to document your interactions, too. Wherever you can, keep communication about your project public. If somebody tries to contact you privately to discuss a feature request or support need, politely direct them to a public communication channel, such as a mailing list or issue tracker.
+### Houd de communicatie openbaar
-If you meet with other maintainers, or make a major decision in private, document these conversations in public, even if it's just posting your notes.
+Vergeet ook niet uw interacties te documenteren. Houd de communicatie over uw project waar mogelijk openbaar. Als iemand privé contact met u opneemt om een functieverzoek of ondersteuningsbehoefte te bespreken, verwijs hem dan beleefd naar een openbaar communicatiekanaal, zoals een mailinglijst of issue tracker.
-That way, anybody who joins your community will have access to the same information as someone who's been there for years.
+Als u andere beheerders ontmoet, of een belangrijke beslissing neemt in privé, documenteer deze gesprekken dan in het openbaar, zelfs als u alleen maar uw aantekeningen plaatst.
-## Learning to say no
+Op die manier heeft iedereen die lid wordt van uw community toegang tot dezelfde informatie als iemand die er al jaren is.
+
+## Nee leren zeggen
You've written things down. Ideally, everybody would read your documentation, but in reality, you'll have to remind others that this knowledge exists.
@@ -164,7 +167,7 @@ Maybe someone in your community regularly submits contributions that don't meet
If you see that someone is enthusiastic about your project, but needs a bit of polish, be patient. Explain clearly in each situation why their contributions don't meet the expectations of the project. Try pointing them to an easier or less ambiguous task, like an issue marked _"good first issue,"_ to get their feet wet. If you have time, consider mentoring them through their first contribution, or find someone else in your community who might be willing to mentor them.
-## Leverage your community
+## Maak gebruik van uw community
You don't have to do everything yourself. Your project's community exists for a reason! Even if you don't yet have an active contributor community, if you have a lot of users, put them to work.
@@ -212,7 +215,7 @@ The same applies to a user who really wants a solution that you simply don't hav
> It's almost inevitable that once a project becomes big, maintainers have to become a lot more conservative about how they introduce new code. You become good at saying "no", but a lot of people have legitimate needs. So, instead you end up converting your tool into a platform.
-## Bring in the robots
+## Breng de robots
Just as there are tasks that other people can help you with, there are also tasks that no human should ever have to do. Robots are your friend. Use them to make your life as a maintainer easier.
@@ -256,7 +259,7 @@ However, if your standards are too complicated, they can increase the barriers t
If you're not sure which tools to use, look at what other popular projects do, especially those in your ecosystem. For example, what does the contribution process look like for other Node modules? Using similar tools and approaches will also make your process more familiar to your target contributors.
-## It's okay to hit pause
+## Het is oké om op pauze te drukken
Open source work once brought you joy. Maybe now it's starting to make you feel avoidant or guilty.
diff --git a/_articles/nl/index.html b/_articles/nl/index.html
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c40c3e9db24
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_articles/nl/index.html
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+---
+layout: index
+title: Open source gids
+lang: nl
+permalink: /nl/
+---
diff --git a/_articles/nl/index.min.html b/_articles/nl/index.min.html
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d89f91b25b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_articles/nl/index.min.html
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+--- layout: index title: Open source gids lang: nl permalink: /nl/ ---
\ No newline at end of file
From c777592cd78f85aff022def902a54dea232317e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley de Groot
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 19:50:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 060/749] =?UTF-8?q?Fixes=20=20Don=E2=80=99t=20pad=20=20wit?=
=?UTF-8?q?h=20inner=20spaces?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
---
_articles/nl/best-practices.md | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/nl/best-practices.md b/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
index b9a73350e0d..ca75e50d38f 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
@@ -70,10 +70,10 @@ Als het onderhouden van uw project parttime of puur vrijwillig is, wees dan eerl
Hier zijn een paar regels die het waard zijn om op te schrijven:
-* Hoe een bijdrage wordt beoordeeld en geaccepteerd (_Hebben ze tests nodig? Een issue-sjabloon? _)
-* De soorten bijdragen die je accepteert (_Wil je alleen hulp bij een bepaald deel van je code? _)
-* Wanneer het gepast is om op te volgen (_bijvoorbeeld: "U kunt binnen 7 dagen een reactie van een onderhouder verwachten. Als u tegen die tijd niets heeft gehoord, kunt u de discussie pingen." _)
-* Hoeveel tijd u aan het project besteedt (_bijvoorbeeld: "We besteden slechts ongeveer 5 uur per week aan dit project" _)
+* Hoe een bijdrage wordt beoordeeld en geaccepteerd (_Hebben ze tests nodig? Een issue-sjabloon?_)
+* De soorten bijdragen die je accepteert (_Wil je alleen hulp bij een bepaald deel van je code?_)
+* Wanneer het gepast is om op te volgen (_bijvoorbeeld: "U kunt binnen 7 dagen een reactie van een onderhouder verwachten. Als u tegen die tijd niets heeft gehoord, kunt u de discussie pingen."_)
+* Hoeveel tijd u aan het project besteedt (_bijvoorbeeld: "We besteden slechts ongeveer 5 uur per week aan dit project"_)
[Jekyll](https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll/tree/master/docs), [CocoaPods](https://github.com/CocoaPods/CocoaPods/wiki/Communication-&-Design-Rules), en [Homebrew](https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/blob/bbed7246bc5c5b7acb8c1d427d10b43e090dfd39/docs/Maintainers-Avoiding-Burnout.md) zijn verschillende voorbeelden van projecten met basisregels voor beheerders en bijdragers.
From 9331b3c2204d53054439f803027de560e7796571 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley de Groot
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:10:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 061/749] Small update + fixed breaking test
---
_articles/nl/best-practices.md | 58 ++++++++++++++++--------------
_articles/nl/building-community.md | 2 +-
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/nl/best-practices.md b/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
index ca75e50d38f..2d7e74da009 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
lang: nl
-title: Tips voor open source-beheerder
+title: Tips voor een open source-beheerder
description: Uw leven gemakkelijker maken als open source-beheerder, van het documenteren van processen tot het benutten van uw gemeenschap.
class: best-practices
toc:
@@ -87,52 +87,56 @@ Op die manier heeft iedereen die lid wordt van uw community toegang tot dezelfde
## Nee leren zeggen
-You've written things down. Ideally, everybody would read your documentation, but in reality, you'll have to remind others that this knowledge exists.
+Je hebt dingen opgeschreven. Idealiter zou iedereen uw documentatie lezen, maar in werkelijkheid moet u anderen eraan herinneren dat deze kennis bestaat.
-Having everything written down, however, helps depersonalize situations when you do need to enforce your rules.
+Door alles op te schrijven, kunt u situaties onpersoonlijk maken waarin u uw regels wel moet handhaven.
-Saying no isn't fun, but _"Your contribution doesn't match this project's criteria"_ feels less personal than _"I don't like your contribution"_.
+Nee zeggen is niet leuk, maar _"Uw bijdrage voldoet niet aan de criteria van dit project"_ voelt minder persoonlijk dan _"Ik vind uw bijdrage niet leuk"_.
-Saying no applies to many situations you'll come across as a maintainer: feature requests that don't fit the scope, someone derailing a discussion, doing unnecessary work for others.
+Nee zeggen is van toepassing op veel situaties die je als open source-onderhouder tegenkomt: functieverzoeken die niet binnen het bereik passen, iemand die een discussie ontspoort, onnodig werk voor anderen doet.
-### Keep the conversation friendly
+### Houd het gesprek vriendelijk
-One of the most important places you'll practice saying no is on your issue and pull request queue. As a project maintainer, you'll inevitably receive suggestions that you don't want to accept.
+Een van de belangrijkste plaatsen waar u kunt oefenen om nee te zeggen, is uw issue en pull request lijst met verzoeken. Als projectbeheerder ontvangt u onvermijdelijk suggesties die u niet wilt accepteren.
-Maybe the contribution changes your project's scope or doesn't match your vision. Maybe the idea is good, but the implementation is poor.
+Misschien verandert de bijdrage de reikwijdte van uw project of past deze niet bij uw visie. Misschien is het idee goed, maar de implementatie is slecht.
-Regardless of the reason, it is possible to tactfully handle contributions that don't meet your project's standards.
+Ongeacht de reden is het mogelijk om tactvol om te gaan met bijdragen die niet voldoen aan de normen van uw project.
-If you receive a contribution you don't want to accept, your first reaction might be to ignore it or pretend you didn't see it. Doing so could hurt the other person's feelings and even demotivate other potential contributors in your community.
+Als u een bijdrage ontvangt die u niet wilt accepteren, is uw eerste reactie misschien dat u deze negeert of doet alsof u deze niet hebt gezien. Dit kan de gevoelens van de ander schaden en zelfs andere potentiële bijdragers in uw gemeenschap demotiveren.
- The key to handle support for large-scale open source projects is to keep issues moving. Try to avoid having issues stall. If you're an iOS developer you know how frustrating it can be to submit radars. You might hear back 2 years later, and are told to try again with the latest version of iOS.
+ De sleutel tot het afhandelen van ondersteuning voor grootschalige open source-projecten is om problemen in beweging te houden. Probeer te voorkomen dat problemen vastlopen. Als je een iOS-ontwikkelaar bent, weet je hoe frustrerend het kan zijn om radars in te dienen. Mogelijk hoort u 2 jaar later terug en wordt u verteld het opnieuw te proberen met de nieuwste versie van iOS.
+
+ _The key to handle support for large-scale open source projects is to keep issues moving. Try to avoid having issues stall. If you're an iOS developer you know how frustrating it can be to submit radars. You might hear back 2 years later, and are told to try again with the latest version of iOS._
— @KrauseFx, ["Scaling open source communities"](https://krausefx.com/blog/scaling-open-source-communities)
-Don't leave an unwanted contribution open because you feel guilty or want to be nice. Over time, your unanswered issues and PRs will make working on your project feel that much more stressful and intimidating.
-
-It's better to immediately close the contributions you know you don't want to accept. If your project already suffers from a large backlog, @steveklabnik has suggestions for [how to triage issues efficiently](https://words.steveklabnik.com/how-to-be-an-open-source-gardener).
+Laat geen ongewenste bijdrage openstaan omdat je je schuldig voelt of aardig wilt zijn. Na verloop van tijd zullen uw onbeantwoorde problemen en PR's het werken aan uw project veel stressvoller en intimiderend maken.
-Secondly, ignoring contributions sends a negative signal to your community. Contributing to a project can be intimidating, especially if it's someone's first time. Even if you don't accept their contribution, acknowledge the person behind it and thank them for their interest. It's a big compliment!
+Het is beter om de bijdragen waarvan u weet dat u ze niet wilt accepteren, onmiddellijk af te sluiten. Als uw project al een grote achterstand heeft, heeft @steveklabnik suggesties voor [hoe u problemen efficiënt kunt sorteren (Engels)](https://words.steveklabnik.com/how-to-be-an-open-source-gardener).
-If you don't want to accept a contribution:
+Ten tweede is het negeren van bijdragen een negatief signaal naar uw gemeenschap. Bijdragen aan een project kan intimiderend zijn, vooral als het iemands eerste keer is. Zelfs als u hun bijdrage niet accepteert, erken de persoon erachter en bedank hem voor zijn interesse. Het is een groot compliment!
+
+Als u een bijdrage niet wil accepteren:
-* **Thank them** for their contribution
-* **Explain why it doesn't fit** into the scope of the project, and offer clear suggestions for improvement, if you're able. Be kind, but firm.
-* **Link to relevant documentation**, if you have it. If you notice repeated requests for things you don't want to accept, add them into your documentation to avoid repeating yourself.
-* **Close the request**
+* **Bedank ze** voor hun bijdrage
+* **Leg uit waarom het niet past** in de scope van het project, en bied duidelijke suggesties voor verbetering, als je kunt. Wees aardig, maar standvastig.
+* **Link naar relevante documentatie**, als u die heeft. Als u herhaalde verzoeken opmerkt voor dingen die u niet wilt accepteren, voegt u deze toe aan uw documentatie om te voorkomen dat u zichzelf herhaalt.
+* **Sluit het verzoek**
-You shouldn't need more than 1-2 sentences to respond. For example, when a user of [celery](https://github.com/celery/celery/) reported a Windows-related error, @berkerpeksag [responded with](https://github.com/celery/celery/issues/3383):
+Je hebt niet meer dan 1-2 zinnen nodig om te reageren. Als voorbeeld, als een gebruiker van [celery](https://github.com/celery/celery/) een Windows-gerelateerde fout meldde, @berkerpeksag [reageerde met (Engels)](https://github.com/celery/celery/issues/3383):
![Celery screenshot](/assets/images/best-practices/celery.png)
-If the thought of saying no terrifies you, you're not alone. As @jessfraz [put it](https://blog.jessfraz.com/post/the-art-of-closing/):
+Als de gedachte om nee te zeggen je bang maakt, ben je niet de enige. zoals @jessfraz [het omschrijft](https://blog.jessfraz.com/post/the-art-of-closing/):
+
+> Ik heb met onderhouders van verschillende open source-projecten gesproken, Mesos, Kubernetes, Chromium, en ze zijn het er allemaal over eens dat een van de moeilijkste aspecten van het zijn van een onderhouder is om "Nee" te zeggen tegen patches die je niet wilt.
-> I've talked to maintainers from several different open source projects, Mesos, Kubernetes, Chromium, and they all agree one of the hardest parts of being a maintainer is saying "No" to patches you don't want.
+> _I've talked to maintainers from several different open source projects, Mesos, Kubernetes, Chromium, and they all agree one of the hardest parts of being a maintainer is saying "No" to patches you don't want._
Don't feel guilty about not wanting to accept someone's contribution. The first rule of open source, [according to](https://twitter.com/solomonstre/status/715277134978113536) @shykes: _"No is temporary, yes is forever."_ While empathizing with another person's enthusiasm is a good thing, rejecting a contribution is not the same as rejecting the person behind it.
@@ -279,12 +283,12 @@ Just like any other type of work, taking regular breaks will keep you refreshed,
-Sometimes, it can be hard to take a break from open source work when it feels like everybody needs you. People may even try to make you feel guilty for stepping away.
+Soms kan het moeilijk zijn om een pauze in te lassen van open source-werk als het voelt alsof iedereen je nodig heeft. Mensen kunnen zelfs proberen je een schuldgevoel te geven omdat je weggaat.
-Do your best to find support for your users and community while you're away from a project. If you can't find the support you need, take a break anyway. Be sure to communicate when you're not available, so people aren't confused by your lack of responsiveness.
+Doe uw best om ondersteuning voor uw gebruikers en gemeenschap te vinden terwijl u niet aan een project zit. Als je de ondersteuning die je nodig hebt niet kunt vinden, neem dan toch een pauze. Zorg ervoor dat u communiceert wanneer u niet beschikbaar bent, zodat mensen niet in de war raken door uw gebrek aan reactievermogen.
-Taking breaks applies to more than just vacations, too. If you don't want to do open source work on weekends, or during work hours, communicate those expectations to others, so they know not to bother you.
+Pauzes nemen geldt ook voor meer dan alleen vakanties. Als je in het weekend of tijdens werkuren geen open source-werk wilt doen, communiceer die verwachtingen dan aan anderen, zodat ze weten dat ze je niet lastig vallen.
## Take care of yourself first!
-Maintaining a popular project requires different skills than the earlier stages of growth, but it's no less rewarding. As a maintainer, you'll practice leadership and personal skills on a level that few people get to experience. While it's not always easy to manage, setting clear boundaries and only taking on what you're comfortable with will help you stay happy, refreshed, and productive.
+Het onderhouden van een populair project vereist andere vaardigheden dan de eerdere groeifasen, maar het is niet minder lonend. Als onderhouder oefen je leiderschap en persoonlijke vaardigheden op een niveau dat maar weinig mensen ervaren. Hoewel het niet altijd gemakkelijk te beheren is, helpt het stellen van duidelijke grenzen en alleen aan te nemen waar je je prettig bij voelt, je gelukkig, verfrist en productief te blijven.
diff --git a/_articles/nl/building-community.md b/_articles/nl/building-community.md
index 73e5cba0ffb..9f5b6e43758 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/building-community.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/building-community.md
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Start with your documentation:
* **When someone new lands on your project, thank them for their interest!** It only takes one negative experience to make someone not want to come back.
* **Be responsive.** If you don't respond to their issue for a month, chances are, they've already forgotten about your project.
* **Be open-minded about the types of contributions you'll accept.** Many contributors start with a bug report or small fix. There are [many ways to contribute](../how-to-contribute/#what-it-means-to-contribute) to a project. Let people help how they want to help.
-* **If there's a contribution you disagree with,** thank them for their idea and [explain why](../best-practices/#learning-to-say-no) it doesn't fit into the scope of the project, linking to relevant documentation if you have it.
+* **If there's a contribution you disagree with,** thank them for their idea and [explain why](../best-practices/#nee-leren-zeggen) it doesn't fit into the scope of the project, linking to relevant documentation if you have it.
From aea70ee584746e7e5e50dcf4db9a4ae16d16cf33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley de Groot
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:18:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 062/749] Fixed retext-repeated-words
---
_articles/nl/best-practices.md | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/nl/best-practices.md b/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
index 2d7e74da009..13305519751 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ Als u een bijdrage ontvangt die u niet wilt accepteren, is uw eerste reactie mis
-Laat geen ongewenste bijdrage openstaan omdat je je schuldig voelt of aardig wilt zijn. Na verloop van tijd zullen uw onbeantwoorde problemen en PR's het werken aan uw project veel stressvoller en intimiderend maken.
+Laat geen ongewenste bijdrage openstaan omdat je een schuldgevoel hebt of aardig wilt zijn. Na verloop van tijd zullen uw onbeantwoorde problemen en PR's het werken aan uw project veel stressvoller en intimiderend maken.
Het is beter om de bijdragen waarvan u weet dat u ze niet wilt accepteren, onmiddellijk af te sluiten. Als uw project al een grote achterstand heeft, heeft @steveklabnik suggesties voor [hoe u problemen efficiënt kunt sorteren (Engels)](https://words.steveklabnik.com/how-to-be-an-open-source-gardener).
@@ -136,8 +136,6 @@ Als de gedachte om nee te zeggen je bang maakt, ben je niet de enige. zoals @jes
> Ik heb met onderhouders van verschillende open source-projecten gesproken, Mesos, Kubernetes, Chromium, en ze zijn het er allemaal over eens dat een van de moeilijkste aspecten van het zijn van een onderhouder is om "Nee" te zeggen tegen patches die je niet wilt.
-> _I've talked to maintainers from several different open source projects, Mesos, Kubernetes, Chromium, and they all agree one of the hardest parts of being a maintainer is saying "No" to patches you don't want._
-
Don't feel guilty about not wanting to accept someone's contribution. The first rule of open source, [according to](https://twitter.com/solomonstre/status/715277134978113536) @shykes: _"No is temporary, yes is forever."_ While empathizing with another person's enthusiasm is a good thing, rejecting a contribution is not the same as rejecting the person behind it.
Ultimately, if a contribution isn't good enough, you're under no obligation to accept it. Be kind and responsive when people contribute to your project, but only accept changes that you truly believe will make your project better. The more often you practice saying no, the easier it becomes. Promise.
@@ -291,4 +289,4 @@ Pauzes nemen geldt ook voor meer dan alleen vakanties. Als je in het weekend of
## Take care of yourself first!
-Het onderhouden van een populair project vereist andere vaardigheden dan de eerdere groeifasen, maar het is niet minder lonend. Als onderhouder oefen je leiderschap en persoonlijke vaardigheden op een niveau dat maar weinig mensen ervaren. Hoewel het niet altijd gemakkelijk te beheren is, helpt het stellen van duidelijke grenzen en alleen aan te nemen waar je je prettig bij voelt, je gelukkig, verfrist en productief te blijven.
+Het onderhouden van een populair project vereist andere vaardigheden dan de eerdere groeifasen, maar het is niet minder lonend. Als onderhouder oefen je leiderschap en persoonlijke vaardigheden op een niveau dat maar weinig mensen ervaren. Hoewel het niet altijd gemakkelijk te beheren is, helpt het stellen van duidelijke grenzen en alleen aan te nemen waar je een prettig gevoel bij hebt, je gelukkig door voelt of wat je verfrist om productief te blijven.
From ce89d025111429132d4bf2b89cee51451d206284 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley de Groot
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:47:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 063/749] updated 'friends' label
---
_articles/nl/best-practices.md | 69 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
_data/locales/nl.yml | 4 +-
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/nl/best-practices.md b/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
index 13305519751..c3f0661a8ed 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ Als u een bijdrage ontvangt die u niet wilt accepteren, is uw eerste reactie mis
Laat geen ongewenste bijdrage openstaan omdat je een schuldgevoel hebt of aardig wilt zijn. Na verloop van tijd zullen uw onbeantwoorde problemen en PR's het werken aan uw project veel stressvoller en intimiderend maken.
-Het is beter om de bijdragen waarvan u weet dat u ze niet wilt accepteren, onmiddellijk af te sluiten. Als uw project al een grote achterstand heeft, heeft @steveklabnik suggesties voor [hoe u problemen efficiënt kunt sorteren (Engels)](https://words.steveklabnik.com/how-to-be-an-open-source-gardener).
+Het is beter om de bijdragen waarvan u weet dat u ze niet wilt accepteren, onmiddellijk af te sluiten. Als uw project al een grote achterstand heeft, heeft @steveklabnik suggesties voor [hoe u problemen efficiënt kunt sorteren](https://words.steveklabnik.com/how-to-be-an-open-source-gardener).
Ten tweede is het negeren van bijdragen een negatief signaal naar uw gemeenschap. Bijdragen aan een project kan intimiderend zijn, vooral als het iemands eerste keer is. Zelfs als u hun bijdrage niet accepteert, erken de persoon erachter en bedank hem voor zijn interesse. Het is een groot compliment!
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ Als u een bijdrage niet wil accepteren:
* **Link naar relevante documentatie**, als u die heeft. Als u herhaalde verzoeken opmerkt voor dingen die u niet wilt accepteren, voegt u deze toe aan uw documentatie om te voorkomen dat u zichzelf herhaalt.
* **Sluit het verzoek**
-Je hebt niet meer dan 1-2 zinnen nodig om te reageren. Als voorbeeld, als een gebruiker van [celery](https://github.com/celery/celery/) een Windows-gerelateerde fout meldde, @berkerpeksag [reageerde met (Engels)](https://github.com/celery/celery/issues/3383):
+Je hebt niet meer dan 1-2 zinnen nodig om te reageren. Als voorbeeld, als een gebruiker van [celery](https://github.com/celery/celery/) een Windows-gerelateerde fout meldde, @berkerpeksag [reageerde met](https://github.com/celery/celery/issues/3383):
![Celery screenshot](/assets/images/best-practices/celery.png)
@@ -136,78 +136,83 @@ Als de gedachte om nee te zeggen je bang maakt, ben je niet de enige. zoals @jes
> Ik heb met onderhouders van verschillende open source-projecten gesproken, Mesos, Kubernetes, Chromium, en ze zijn het er allemaal over eens dat een van de moeilijkste aspecten van het zijn van een onderhouder is om "Nee" te zeggen tegen patches die je niet wilt.
-Don't feel guilty about not wanting to accept someone's contribution. The first rule of open source, [according to](https://twitter.com/solomonstre/status/715277134978113536) @shykes: _"No is temporary, yes is forever."_ While empathizing with another person's enthusiasm is a good thing, rejecting a contribution is not the same as rejecting the person behind it.
+Voel je niet schuldig over het niet willen accepteren van iemands bijdrage. De eerste regel van open source, [volgens](https://twitter.com/solomonstre/status/715277134978113536) @shykes: _"Nee is tijdelijk, ja is voor altijd."_ Hoewel empathie met het enthousiasme van een ander een goede zaak is, is het afwijzen van een bijdrage niet hetzelfde als het afwijzen van de persoon erachter.
-Ultimately, if a contribution isn't good enough, you're under no obligation to accept it. Be kind and responsive when people contribute to your project, but only accept changes that you truly believe will make your project better. The more often you practice saying no, the easier it becomes. Promise.
+Als een bijdrage uiteindelijk niet goed genoeg is, bent u niet verplicht deze te accepteren. Wees vriendelijk en responsief wanneer mensen bijdragen aan uw project, maar accepteer alleen veranderingen waarvan u echt denkt dat ze uw project beter zullen maken. Hoe vaker je oefent om nee te zeggen, hoe gemakkelijker het wordt. Beloofd.
-### Be proactive
+### Wees proactief
-To reduce the volume of unwanted contributions in the first place, explain your project's process for submitting and accepting contributions in your contributing guide.
+Om het aantal ongewenste bijdragen in de eerste plaats te verminderen, legt u het proces van uw project voor het indienen en accepteren van bijdragen uit in uw handleiding voor bijdragen.
-If you're receiving too many low-quality contributions, require that contributors do a bit of work beforehand, for example:
+Als u te veel bijdragen van lage kwaliteit ontvangt, moet u van tevoren eisen dat bijdragers wat werk doen, bijvoorbeeld:
-* Fill out a issue or PR template/checklist
-* Open an issue before submitting a PR
+* Vul een probleem of PR-sjabloon/checklist in
+* Open een issue voordat je een PR opent
-If they don't follow your rules, close the issue immediately and point to your documentation.
+Als ze uw regels niet volgen, sluit u het probleem onmiddellijk af en verwijst u naar uw documentatie.
-While this approach may feel unkind at first, being proactive is actually good for both parties. It reduces the chance that someone will put in many wasted hours of work into a pull request that you aren't going to accept. And it makes your workload easier to manage.
+Hoewel deze aanpak in het begin misschien onaardig aanvoelt, is proactief zijn eigenlijk goed voor beide partijen. Het verkleint de kans dat iemand veel verspilde uren werk in een pull-verzoek stopt dat u niet zult accepteren. En het maakt uw werklast gemakkelijker te beheren.
- Ideally, explain to them and in a CONTRIBUTING.md file how they can get a better indication in the future on what would or would not be accepted before they begin the work.
+ Leg ze idealiter en in een CONTRIBUTING.md-bestand uit hoe ze in de toekomst een betere indicatie kunnen krijgen van wat wel of niet geaccepteerd zou worden voordat ze met het werk beginnen.
+
+ _Ideally, explain to them and in a CONTRIBUTING.md file how they can get a better indication in the future on what would or would not be accepted before they begin the work._
— @MikeMcQuaid, ["Kindly Closing Pull Requests"](https://github.com/blog/2124-kindly-closing-pull-requests)
-Sometimes, when you say no, your potential contributor may get upset or criticize your decision. If their behavior becomes hostile, [take steps to defuse the situation](https://github.com/jonschlinkert/maintainers-guide-to-staying-positive#action-items) or even remove them from your community, if they're not willing to collaborate constructively.
+Soms, als u nee zegt, kan uw potentiële bijdrager van streek raken of uw beslissing bekritiseren. Als hun gedrag vijandig wordt, [neem deze maatregelen om het positief te houden](https://github.com/jonschlinkert/maintainers-guide-to-staying-positive#action-items) of verwijder ze zelfs uit uw gemeenschap, als ze niet bereid zijn constructief samen te werken.
-### Embrace mentorship
+### Omarm mentorschap
-Maybe someone in your community regularly submits contributions that don't meet your project's standards. It can be frustrating for both parties to repeatedly go through rejections.
+Misschien dient iemand in uw gemeenschap regelmatig bijdragen in die niet voldoen aan de normen van uw project. Het kan voor beide partijen frustrerend zijn om herhaaldelijk afwijzingen te doorstaan.
-If you see that someone is enthusiastic about your project, but needs a bit of polish, be patient. Explain clearly in each situation why their contributions don't meet the expectations of the project. Try pointing them to an easier or less ambiguous task, like an issue marked _"good first issue,"_ to get their feet wet. If you have time, consider mentoring them through their first contribution, or find someone else in your community who might be willing to mentor them.
+Als je ziet dat iemand enthousiast is over je project, maar een beetje gepolijst moet worden, wees dan geduldig. Leg in elke situatie duidelijk uit waarom hun bijdragen niet voldoen aan de verwachtingen van het project. Wijs ze op een gemakkelijkere of minder dubbelzinnige taak, zoals een probleem met de aanduiding _"good first issue"_ om ze te laten wennen. Als u tijd heeft, overweeg dan om hen te begeleiden door middel van hun eerste bijdrage, of zoek iemand anders in uw gemeenschap die misschien bereid is om hen te begeleiden.
## Maak gebruik van uw community
-You don't have to do everything yourself. Your project's community exists for a reason! Even if you don't yet have an active contributor community, if you have a lot of users, put them to work.
+U hoeft niet alles zelf te doen. De gemeenschap van uw project bestaat niet voor niets! Zelfs als u nog geen actieve bijdragersgemeenschap heeft, kunt u, als u veel gebruikers heeft, ze aan het werk zetten.
-### Share the workload
+### Deel de werklast
-If you're looking for others to pitch in, start by asking around.
+Als je op zoek bent naar anderen om bij te praten, begin dan met rond te vragen.
-One way to gain new contributors is to explicitly [label issues that are simple enough for beginners to tackle](https://help.github.com/en/articles/helping-new-contributors-find-your-project-with-labels). GitHub will then surface these issues in various places on the platform, increasing their visibility.
+Een manier om nieuwe bijdragers te werven, is door expliciet [label problemen die voor beginners eenvoudig genoeg zijn om aan te pakken](https://help.github.com/en/articles/helping-new-contributors-find-your-project-with-labels). GitHub zal deze problemen vervolgens op verschillende plaatsen op het platform aan de oppervlakte brengen, waardoor hun zichtbaarheid wordt vergroot.
-When you see new contributors making repeated contributions, recognize their work by offering more responsibility. Document how others can grow into leadership roles if they wish.
+Als je ziet dat nieuwe bijdragers herhaaldelijk bijdragen leveren, erken dan hun werk door meer verantwoordelijkheid te bieden. Documenteer hoe anderen kunnen uitgroeien tot leiderschapsrollen als ze dat willen.
-Encouraging others to [share ownership of the project](../building-community/#share-ownership-of-your-project) can greatly reduce your own workload, as @lmccart discovered on her project, [p5.js](https://github.com/processing/p5.js).
+Anderen aanmoedigen om [aandeelhouderschap van het project](../building-community/#share-ownership-of-your-project) te nemen, kan je werklast verlagen, zoals @lmccart ondekte op haar project, [p5.js](https://github.com/processing/p5.js).
- I’d been saying, "Yeah, anyone can be involved, you don’t have to have a lot of coding expertise [...]." We had people sign up to come [to an event] and that’s when I was really wondering: is this true, what I’ve been saying? There are gonna be 40 people who show up, and it’s not like I can sit with each of them...But people came together, and it just sort of worked. As soon as one person got it, they could teach their neighbor.
+ Ik had gezegd: "Ja, iedereen kan erbij betrokken zijn, je hoeft niet veel codeerkennis te hebben [...]." Er waren mensen die zich hadden aangemeld om [naar een evenement] te komen en toen vroeg ik me echt af: is dit waar, wat ik heb gezegd? Er zullen 40 mensen komen opdagen, en het is niet alsof ik bij elk van hen kan zitten... Maar mensen kwamen samen, en het werkte gewoon. Zodra een persoon het kreeg, konden ze het hun buurman leren.
+
-— @lmccart, ["What Does "Open Source" Even Mean? p5.js Edition"](https://medium.com/@kenjagan/what-does-open-source-even-mean-p5-js-edition-98c02d354b39)
+— @lmccart, ["Wat betekent "open source"? P5.js Edition"](https://medium.com/@kenjagan/what-does-open-source-even-mean-p5-js-edition-98c02d354b39)
-If you need to step away from your project, either on hiatus or permanently, there's no shame in asking someone else to take over for you.
+Als u afstand moet nemen van uw project, hetzij op pauze, hetzij permanent, is het geen schande om iemand anders te vragen om het voor u over te nemen.
-If other people are enthusiastic about its direction, give them commit access or formally hand over control to someone else. If someone forked your project and is actively maintaining it elsewhere, consider linking to the fork from your original project. It's great that so many people want your project to live on!
+Als andere mensen enthousiast zijn over de richting, geef ze dan toegang of draag de controle formeel over aan iemand anders. Als iemand uw project heeft geforked en het actief elders onderhoudt, overweeg dan om te linken naar de fork van uw oorspronkelijke project. Het is geweldig dat zoveel mensen willen dat uw project voortleeft!
-@progrium [found that](https://web.archive.org/web/20151204215958/https://progrium.com/blog/2015/12/04/leadership-guilt-and-pull-requests/) documenting the vision for his project, [Dokku](https://github.com/dokku/dokku), helped those goals live on even after he stepped away from the project:
+@progrium [merkte dat](https://web.archive.org/web/20151204215958/https://progrium.com/blog/2015/12/04/leadership-guilt-and-pull-requests/) het documentern van zijn visie voor het project, [Dokku](https://github.com/dokku/dokku), hielp die doelen voortleven, zelfs nadat hij het project had verlaten:
-> I wrote a wiki page describing what I wanted and why I wanted it. For some reason it came as a surprise to me that the maintainers started moving the project in that direction! Did it happen exactly how I'd do it? Not always. But it still brought the project closer to what I wrote down.
+> Ik schreef een wikipagina die beschreef wat ik wilde en waarom ik het wilde. Om de een of andere reden kwam het als een verrassing voor mij dat de beheerders het project in die richting begonnen te bewegen! Is het precies gebeurd zoals ik het zou doen? Niet altijd. Maar het bracht het project nog steeds dichter bij wat ik had opgeschreven.
-### Let others build the solutions they need
+### Laat anderen de oplossingen bouwen die ze nodig hebben
-If a potential contributor has a different opinion on what your project should do, you may want to gently encourage them to work on their own fork.
+Als een potentiële bijdrager een andere mening heeft over wat uw project zou moeten doen, wilt u hem misschien voorzichtig aanmoedigen om aan zijn eigen fork te werken.
-Forking a project doesn't have to be a bad thing. Being able to copy and modify projects is one of the best things about open source. Encouraging your community members to work on their own fork can provide the creative outlet they need, without conflicting with your project's vision.
+Een project forceren hoeft geen slechte zaak te zijn. Projecten kunnen kopiëren en wijzigen is een van de beste dingen van open source. Door uw gemeenschapsleden aan te moedigen om aan hun eigen fork te werken, kan dit de creatieve uitlaatklep zijn die ze nodig hebben, zonder in strijd te zijn met de visie van uw project.
- I cater to the 80% use case. If you are one of the unicorns, please fork my work. I won't get offended! My public projects are almost always meant to solve the most common problems; I try to make it easy to go deeper by either forking my work or extending it.
+ Ik speel in op de use case van 80%. Als je een van de eenhoorns bent, fork mijn werk dan alsjeblieft. Ik zal niet beledigd worden! Mijn openbare projecten zijn bijna altijd bedoeld om de meest voorkomende problemen op te lossen; Ik probeer het gemakkelijk te maken om dieper te gaan door mijn werk te forceren of uit te breiden.
+
+ _I cater to the 80% use case. If you are one of the unicorns, please fork my work. I won't get offended! My public projects are almost always meant to solve the most common problems; I try to make it easy to go deeper by either forking my work or extending it._
— @geerlingguy, ["Why I Close PRs"](https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2016/why-i-close-prs-oss-project-maintainer-notes)
diff --git a/_data/locales/nl.yml b/_data/locales/nl.yml
index b47af74e9df..072e1964f4d 100644
--- a/_data/locales/nl.yml
+++ b/_data/locales/nl.yml
@@ -26,6 +26,6 @@ nl:
# Label for code octicon
code_label: code
# Label for love octicon
- love_label: love
+ love_label: liefde
# Label for the contributors link
- friends_label: friends
+ friends_label: vrienden
From 77216dd09b7f2f0b9bf059607e637673c5814de3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley de Groot
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:14:40 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 064/749] Finished 'Best Practices'
---
_articles/nl/best-practices.md | 64 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
_articles/nl/index.min.html | 1 -
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 _articles/nl/index.min.html
diff --git a/_articles/nl/best-practices.md b/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
index c3f0661a8ed..dbbd6cef11c 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
@@ -224,65 +224,71 @@ The same applies to a user who really wants a solution that you simply don't hav
## Breng de robots
-Just as there are tasks that other people can help you with, there are also tasks that no human should ever have to do. Robots are your friend. Use them to make your life as a maintainer easier.
+Net zoals er taken zijn waar andere mensen je mee kunnen helpen, zijn er ook taken die geen mens ooit zou moeten hoeven doen. Robots zijn je vrienden. Gebruik ze om uw leven als open source-onderhouder gemakkelijker te maken.
-### Require tests and other checks to improve the quality of your code
+### Vereis tests en andere controles om de kwaliteit van uw code te verbeteren
-One of the most important ways you can automate your project is by adding tests.
+Een van de belangrijkste manieren waarop u uw project kunt automatiseren, is door tests toe te voegen.
-Tests help contributors feel confident that they won't break anything. They also make it easier for you to review and accept contributions quickly. The more responsive you are, the more engaged your community can be.
+Tests helpen bijdragers het vertrouwen te hebben dat ze niets zullen breken. Ze maken het ook gemakkelijker voor u om bijdragen snel te bekijken en te accepteren. Hoe responsiever u bent, hoe meer uw gemeenschap betrokken kan zijn.
-Set up automatic tests that will run on all incoming contributions, and ensure that your tests can easily be run locally by contributors. Require that all code contributions pass your tests before they can be submitted. You'll help set a minimum standard of quality for all submissions. [Required status checks](https://help.github.com/articles/about-required-status-checks/) on GitHub can help ensure no change gets merged without your tests passing.
+Stel automatische tests in die op alle inkomende bijdragen worden uitgevoerd en zorg ervoor dat uw tests gemakkelijk lokaal door bijdragers kunnen worden uitgevoerd. Vereisen dat alle codebijdragen slagen voor uw tests voordat ze kunnen worden ingediend. Je helpt mee met het instellen van een minimale kwaliteitsnorm voor alle inzendingen. [Vereiste statuschecks](https://help.github.com/articles/about-required-status-checks/) op GitHub kan ervoor zorgen dat geen enkele wijziging wordt gemerged zonder dat uw tests slagen.
-If you add tests, make sure to explain how they work in your CONTRIBUTING file.
+Als u tests toevoegt, leg dan uit hoe ze werken in uw CONTRIBUTING-bestand.
- I believe that tests are necessary for all code that people work on. If the code was fully and perfectly correct, it wouldn't need changes – we only write code when something is wrong, whether that's "It crashes" or "It lacks such-and-such a feature". And regardless of the changes you're making, tests are essential for catching any regressions you might accidentally introduce.
+ Ik geloof dat tests nodig zijn voor alle code waar mensen aan werken. Als de code volledig en perfect correct was, zou het geen wijzigingen nodig hebben - we schrijven alleen code als er iets mis is, of dat nu "Het crasht" of "Het mist zo-en-zo-functie". En ongeacht de wijzigingen die u aanbrengt, zijn tests essentieel om eventuele regressies op te sporen die u per ongeluk zou kunnen introduceren.
+
+ _I believe that tests are necessary for all code that people work on. If the code was fully and perfectly correct, it wouldn't need changes – we only write code when something is wrong, whether that's "It crashes" or "It lacks such-and-such a feature". And regardless of the changes you're making, tests are essential for catching any regressions you might accidentally introduce._
-— @edunham, ["Rust's Community Automation"](https://edunham.net/2016/09/27/rust_s_community_automation.html)
+— @edunham, ["Rust's gemeenschapsautomatisering"](https://edunham.net/2016/09/27/rust_s_community_automation.html)
-### Use tools to automate basic maintenance tasks
+### Gebruik tools om eenvoudige onderhoudstaken te automatiseren
+
+Het goede nieuws over het onderhouden van een populair project is dat andere beheerders waarschijnlijk met soortgelijke problemen te maken hebben gehad en er een oplossing voor hebben gebouwd.
-The good news about maintaining a popular project is that other maintainers have probably faced similar issues and built a solution for it.
+Er zijn een hoop [verschillende tools beschikbaar](https://github.com/showcases/tools-for-open-source) om te helpen om sommige aspecten te automatiseren.
-There are a [variety of tools available](https://github.com/showcases/tools-for-open-source) to help automate some aspects of maintenance work. A few examples:
+Een paar voorbeelden:
-* [semantic-release](https://github.com/semantic-release/semantic-release) automates your releases
-* [mention-bot](https://github.com/facebook/mention-bot) mentions potential reviewers for pull requests
-* [Danger](https://github.com/danger/danger) helps automate code review
-* [no-response](https://github.com/probot/no-response) closes issues where the author hasn't responded to a request for more information
-* [dependabot-preview](https://github.com/marketplace/dependabot-preview) checks your dependency files every day for outdated requirements and opens individual pull requests for any it finds
+* [semantic-release](https://github.com/semantic-release/semantic-release) automatiseert uw releases
+* [mention-bot](https://github.com/facebook/mention-bot) vermeldt potentiële reviewers voor pull-aanvragen
+* [Danger](https://github.com/danger/danger) helpt bij het automatiseren van codebeoordeling
+* [no-response](https://github.com/probot/no-response) sluit issues af waarbij de auteur niet heeft gereageerd op een verzoek om meer informatie
+* [dependabot-preview](https://github.com/marketplace/dependabot-preview) controleert uw afhankelijkheidsbestanden elke dag op verouderde vereisten en opent individuele pull-verzoeken voor alle gevonden items
-For bug reports and other common contributions, GitHub has [Issue Templates and Pull Request Templates](https://github.com/blog/2111-issue-and-pull-request-templates), which you can create to streamline the communication you receive. @TalAter made a [Choose Your Own Adventure guide](https://www.talater.com/open-source-templates/#/) to help you write your issue and PR templates.
+Voor bugrapporten en andere veelvoorkomende bijdragen heeft GitHub [Issue-sjablonen en Pull Request-sjablonen](https://github.com/blog/2111-issue-and-pull-request-templates), die u kunt maken om de communicatie die u ontvangt te stroomlijnen. @TalAter heeft een [Kies je eigen avonturengids](https://www.talater.com/open-source-templates/#/) gemaakt om u te helpen bij het schrijven van uw issue en PR-sjablonen.
-To manage your email notifications, you can set up [email filters](https://github.com/blog/2203-email-updates-about-your-own-activity) to organize by priority.
+Om uw e-mailmeldingen te beheren, kunt u [email filters](https://github.com/blog/2203-email-updates-about-your-own-activity) instellen om te organiseren op prioriteit.
-If you want to get a little more advanced, style guides and linters can standardize project contributions and make them easier to review and accept.
+Als je wat geavanceerder wilt worden, kunnen stijlgidsen en linters projectbijdragen standaardiseren en ze gemakkelijker te beoordelen en te accepteren maken.
-However, if your standards are too complicated, they can increase the barriers to contribution. Make sure you're only adding enough rules to make everyone's lives easier.
+Als uw normen echter te ingewikkeld zijn, kunnen ze de drempels voor bijdragen vergroten. Zorg ervoor dat u alleen voldoende regels toevoegt om het leven van iedereen gemakkelijker te maken.
-If you're not sure which tools to use, look at what other popular projects do, especially those in your ecosystem. For example, what does the contribution process look like for other Node modules? Using similar tools and approaches will also make your process more familiar to your target contributors.
+Als u niet zeker weet welke tools u moet gebruiken, kijk dan wat andere populaire projecten doen, vooral die in uw ecosysteem. Hoe ziet het contributieproces er bijvoorbeeld uit voor andere Node-modules? Het gebruik van vergelijkbare tools en benaderingen zal uw proces ook meer vertrouwd maken bij uw beoogde bijdragers.
## Het is oké om op pauze te drukken
-Open source work once brought you joy. Maybe now it's starting to make you feel avoidant or guilty.
+Open source-werk heeft je ooit vreugde gebracht. Misschien begint het je nu een ontwijkend of schuldig gevoel te geven.
-Perhaps you're feeling overwhelmed or a growing sense of dread when you think about your projects. And meanwhile, the issues and pull requests pile up.
+Misschien heb je het gevoel overweldigd te zijn of krijg je steeds meer angst als je aan je projecten denkt. En ondertussen stapelen de problemen en pull-verzoeken zich op.
-Burnout is a real and pervasive issue in open source work, especially among maintainers. As a maintainer, your happiness is a non-negotiable requirement for the survival of any open source project.
+Burn-out is een echt en doordringend probleem in open source-werk, vooral onder beheerders. Als open source-onderhouder is uw geluk een niet-onderhandelbare vereiste voor het voortbestaan van elk open source-project.
-Although it should go without saying, take a break! You shouldn't have to wait until you feel burned out to take a vacation. @brettcannon, a Python core developer, decided to take [a month-long vacation](https://snarky.ca/why-i-took-october-off-from-oss-volunteering/) after 14 years of volunteer OSS work.
+Hoewel het vanzelfsprekend zou moeten zijn, neem een pauze! U hoeft niet te wachten tot u zich opgebrand voelt om op vakantie te gaan. @brettcannon, een Python-kernontwikkelaar, besloot [een maand lang op vakantie te gaan](https://snarky.ca/why-i-took-october-off-from-oss-volunteering/) na 14 jaar als vrijwillig OSS (Opensource) werk.
-Just like any other type of work, taking regular breaks will keep you refreshed, happy, and excited about your work.
+Net als bij elk ander soort werk, zal het nemen van regelmatige pauzes je verfrist, blij en enthousiast over je werk houden.
- In maintaining WP-CLI, I've discovered I need to make myself happy first, and set clear boundaries on my involvement. The best balance I've found is 2-5 hours per week, as a part of my normal work schedule. This keeps my involvement a passion, and from feeling too much like work. Because I prioritize the issues I'm working on, I can make regular progress on what I think is most important.
+ Bij het onderhouden van WP-CLI heb ik ontdekt dat ik mezelf eerst gelukkig moet maken en duidelijke grenzen moet stellen aan mijn betrokkenheid. De beste balans die ik heb gevonden, is 2-5 uur per week, als onderdeel van mijn normale werkschema. Dit zorgt ervoor dat mijn betrokkenheid een passie blijft, en dat ik me niet te veel als werk voel. Omdat ik prioriteit geef aan de problemen waaraan ik werk, kan ik regelmatig vooruitgang boeken op wat ik denk dat het belangrijkst is.
+
+ _In maintaining WP-CLI, I've discovered I need to make myself happy first, and set clear boundaries on my involvement. The best balance I've found is 2-5 hours per week, as a part of my normal work schedule. This keeps my involvement a passion, and from feeling too much like work. Because I prioritize the issues I'm working on, I can make regular progress on what I think is most important._
-— @danielbachhuber, ["My condolences, you're now the maintainer of a popular open source project"](https://runcommand.io/2016/06/26/my-condolences-youre-now-the-maintainer-of-a-popular-open-source-project/)
+— @danielbachhuber, ["Mijn condoleances, u bent nu de onderhouder (_maintainer_) van een populair open source-project"](https://runcommand.io/2016/06/26/my-condolences-youre-now-the-maintainer-of-a-popular-open-source-project/)
@@ -292,6 +298,6 @@ Doe uw best om ondersteuning voor uw gebruikers en gemeenschap te vinden terwijl
Pauzes nemen geldt ook voor meer dan alleen vakanties. Als je in het weekend of tijdens werkuren geen open source-werk wilt doen, communiceer die verwachtingen dan aan anderen, zodat ze weten dat ze je niet lastig vallen.
-## Take care of yourself first!
+## Zorg eerst voor uzelf!
Het onderhouden van een populair project vereist andere vaardigheden dan de eerdere groeifasen, maar het is niet minder lonend. Als onderhouder oefen je leiderschap en persoonlijke vaardigheden op een niveau dat maar weinig mensen ervaren. Hoewel het niet altijd gemakkelijk te beheren is, helpt het stellen van duidelijke grenzen en alleen aan te nemen waar je een prettig gevoel bij hebt, je gelukkig door voelt of wat je verfrist om productief te blijven.
diff --git a/_articles/nl/index.min.html b/_articles/nl/index.min.html
deleted file mode 100644
index d89f91b25b7..00000000000
--- a/_articles/nl/index.min.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
---- layout: index title: Open source gids lang: nl permalink: /nl/ ---
\ No newline at end of file
From 1507fd90d6e4122aef4453d2e051f912d1a239a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley de Groot
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:04:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 065/749] Article 'Building Community'
---
_articles/nl/best-practices.md | 2 +-
_articles/nl/building-community.md | 261 ++++++++++++----------
_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md | 2 +-
3 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/nl/best-practices.md b/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
index dbbd6cef11c..be4fd139e47 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/best-practices.md
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ Een manier om nieuwe bijdragers te werven, is door expliciet [label problemen di
Als je ziet dat nieuwe bijdragers herhaaldelijk bijdragen leveren, erken dan hun werk door meer verantwoordelijkheid te bieden. Documenteer hoe anderen kunnen uitgroeien tot leiderschapsrollen als ze dat willen.
-Anderen aanmoedigen om [aandeelhouderschap van het project](../building-community/#share-ownership-of-your-project) te nemen, kan je werklast verlagen, zoals @lmccart ondekte op haar project, [p5.js](https://github.com/processing/p5.js).
+Anderen aanmoedigen om [aandeelhouderschap van het project](../building-community/#deel-het-eigendom-van-uw-project) te nemen, kan je werklast verlagen, zoals @lmccart ondekte op haar project, [p5.js](https://github.com/processing/p5.js).
diff --git a/_articles/nl/building-community.md b/_articles/nl/building-community.md
index 9f5b6e43758..28c9ef3bded 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/building-community.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/building-community.md
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
---
lang: nl
-title: Building Welcoming Communities
-description: Building a community that encourages people to use, contribute to, and evangelize your project.
+title: Bouwen aan gastvrije gemeenschappen
+description: Een gemeenschap opbouwen die mensen aanmoedigt om uw project te gebruiken, eraan bij te dragen en het te evangeliseren.
class: building
toc:
- setting-your-project-up-for-success: "Setting your project up for success"
- growing-your-community: "Growing your community"
- resolving-conflicts: "Resolving conflicts"
+ setting-your-project-up-for-success: "Uw project opzetten voor succes"
+ growing-your-community: "Je community laten groeien"
+ resolving-conflicts: "Conflicten oplossen"
order: 4
image: /assets/images/cards/building.png
related:
@@ -14,267 +14,284 @@ related:
- coc
---
-## Setting your project up for success
+## Uw project opzetten voor succes
-You've launched your project, you're spreading the word, and people are checking it out. Awesome! Now, how do you get them to stick around?
+Je hebt je project gelanceerd, je verspreidt het woord en mensen bekijken het. Geweldig! Nu, hoe zorg je ervoor dat ze blijven hangen?
-A welcoming community is an investment into your project's future and reputation. If your project is just starting to see its first contributions, start by giving early contributors a positive experience, and make it easy for them to keep coming back.
+Een gastvrije gemeenschap is een investering in de toekomst en reputatie van uw project. Als je project net zijn eerste bijdragen begint te zien, begin dan met het geven van een positieve ervaring aan vroege bijdragers en zorg ervoor dat ze gemakkelijk terug blijven komen.
-### Make people feel welcome
+### Zorg ervoor dat mensen zich welkom voelen
-One way to think about your project's community is through what @MikeMcQuaid calls the [contributor funnel](https://mikemcquaid.com/2018/08/14/the-open-source-contributor-funnel-why-people-dont-contribute-to-your-open-source-project/):
+Een manier om na te denken over de gemeenschap van uw project is door wat @MikeMcQuaid het [bijdrager trechter](https://mikemcquaid.com/2018/08/14/the-open-source-contributor-funnel-why-people-dont-contribute-to-your-open-source-project/) noemt:
-![Contributor funnel](/assets/images/building-community/contributor_funnel_mikemcquaid.png)
+![bijdrager trechter](/assets/images/building-community/contributor_funnel_mikemcquaid.png)
-As you build your community, consider how someone at the top of the funnel (a potential user) might theoretically make their way to the bottom (an active maintainer). Your goal is to reduce friction at each stage of the contributor experience. When people have easy wins, they will feel incentivized to do more.
+Bedenk bij het opbouwen van uw community hoe iemand bovenaan de trechter (een potentiële gebruiker) theoretisch de weg naar de bodem kan vinden (een actieve onderhouder). Uw doel is om wrijving in elke fase van de bijdragerservaring te verminderen. Als mensen gemakkelijk winnen, voelen ze zich gestimuleerd om meer te doen.
-Start with your documentation:
+Begin met uw documentatie:
-* **Make it easy for someone to use your project.** [A friendly README](../starting-a-project/#writing-a-readme) and clear code examples will make it easier for anyone who lands on your project to get started.
-* **Clearly explain how to contribute**, using [your CONTRIBUTING file](../starting-a-project/#writing-your-contributing-guidelines) and keeping your issues up-to-date.
-* **Good first issues**: To help new contributors get started, consider explicitly [labeling issues that are simple enough for beginners to tackle](https://help.github.com/en/articles/helping-new-contributors-find-your-project-with-labels). GitHub will then surface these issues in various places on the platform, increasing useful contributions, and reducing friction from users tackling issues that are too hard for their level.
+* **Maak het voor iemand gemakkelijk om uw project te gebruiken.** [Een vriendelijke README](../starting-a-project/#writing-a-readme) en duidelijke codevoorbeelden maken het gemakkelijker voor iedereen die op uw project belandt om aan de slag te gaan.
+* **Leg duidelijk uit hoe u kunt bijdragen**, gebruik [je CONTRIBUTING bestand](../starting-a-project/#writing-your-contributing-guidelines) en uw issues up-to-date houden.
+* **Goede first issues**: Overweeg expliciet om nieuwe bijdragers op weg te helpen [label issues die eenvoudig genoeg zijn voor beginners om aan te pakken](https://help.github.com/en/articles/helping-new-contributors-find-your-project-with-labels). GitHub zal deze issues vervolgens op verschillende plaatsen op het platform aan de oppervlakte brengen, waardoor nuttige bijdragen worden verhoogd en de wrijving wordt verminderd van gebruikers die problemen aanpakken die te moeilijk zijn voor hun niveau.
+* [GitHub's Open Source-enquête 2017](http://opensourcesurvey.org/2017/) vertoonde onvolledige of verwarrende documentatie is het grootste probleem voor open source-gebruikers. Goede documentatie nodigt uit tot interactie met uw project. Uiteindelijk zal iemand een issue of pull request openen. Gebruik deze interacties als kansen om ze door de trechter te verplaatsen.
-[GitHub's 2017 Open Source Survey](http://opensourcesurvey.org/2017/) showed incomplete or confusing documentation is the biggest problem for open source users. Good documentation invites people to interact with your project. Eventually, someone will open an issue or pull request. Use these interactions as opportunities to move them down the funnel.
-
-* **When someone new lands on your project, thank them for their interest!** It only takes one negative experience to make someone not want to come back.
-* **Be responsive.** If you don't respond to their issue for a month, chances are, they've already forgotten about your project.
-* **Be open-minded about the types of contributions you'll accept.** Many contributors start with a bug report or small fix. There are [many ways to contribute](../how-to-contribute/#what-it-means-to-contribute) to a project. Let people help how they want to help.
-* **If there's a contribution you disagree with,** thank them for their idea and [explain why](../best-practices/#nee-leren-zeggen) it doesn't fit into the scope of the project, linking to relevant documentation if you have it.
+* **Als iemand nieuw op uw project komt, bedank hem dan voor zijn interesse!** Er is maar één negatieve ervaring nodig om ervoor te zorgen dat iemand niet meer terug wil komen.
+* **Wees responsief.** Als u een maand lang niet op hun probleem reageert, is de kans groot dat ze uw project al zijn vergeten.
+* **Sta open voor de soorten bijdragen die u accepteert.** Veel bijdragers beginnen met een bugrapport of een kleine oplossing. Er zijn [veel manieren om bij te dragen](../how-to-contribute/#what-it-means-to-contribute) aan een project. Laat mensen helpen zoals ze willen helpen.
+* **Als er een bijdrage is waar u het niet mee eens bent,** bedank ze voor hun idee, en [vertel waarom](../best-practices/#nee-leren-zeggen) het niet past in de scope van het project en linkt naar relevante documentatie als je die hebt.
- Contributing to open source is easier for some than others. There's a lot of fear of being yelled at for not doing something right or just not fitting in. (...) By giving contributors a place to contribute with very low technical proficiency (documentation, web content markdown, etc) you can greatly reduce those concerns.
+ Bijdragen aan open source is voor sommigen gemakkelijker dan voor anderen. Er is veel angst om te worden uitgescholden omdat ze iets niet goed doen of gewoon niet passen. (...) Door bijdragers een plek te geven om bij te dragen met een zeer lage technische vaardigheid (documentatie, afwaardering van webinhoud, enz.), Kunt u aanzienlijk verminderen die zorgen.
+
+ _Contributing to open source is easier for some than others. There's a lot of fear of being yelled at for not doing something right or just not fitting in. (...) By giving contributors a place to contribute with very low technical proficiency (documentation, web content markdown, etc) you can greatly reduce those concerns._
-— @mikeal, ["Growing a contributor base in modern open source"](https://opensource.com/life/16/5/growing-contributor-base-modern-open-source)
+— @mikeal, ["Een bijdrage leveren in moderne open source"](https://opensource.com/life/16/5/growing-contributor-base-modern-open-source)
-The majority of open source contributors are "casual contributors": people who contribute to a project only occasionally. A casual contributor may not have time to get fully up to speed with your project, so your job is to make it easy for them to contribute.
+De meeste open source-bijdragers zijn "casual bijdragers": mensen die slechts af en toe bijdragen aan een project. Een toevallige bijdrager heeft misschien geen tijd om volledig op de hoogte te zijn van uw project, dus het is uw taak om het hem gemakkelijk te maken om bij te dragen.
-Encouraging other contributors is an investment in yourself, too. When you empower your biggest fans to run with the work they're excited about, there's less pressure to do everything yourself.
+Andere bijdragers aanmoedigen is ook een investering in uzelf. Als u uw grootste fans de kracht geeft om te rennen met het werk waar ze enthousiast over zijn, is er minder druk om alles zelf te doen.
-### Document everything
+### Documenteer alles
- Have you ever been to a (tech-) event where you didn't know anyone, but everyone else seemed to stand in groups and chat like old friends? (...) Now imagine you want to contribute to an open source project, but you don't see why or how this is happening.
+ Ben je ooit naar een (tech-) evenement geweest waar je niemand kende, maar iedereen leek in groepen te staan en te chatten als oude vrienden? (...) Stel je nu voor dat je wilt bijdragen aan een open source-project, maar je begrijpt niet waarom of hoe dit gebeurt.
+
+ _Have you ever been to a (tech-) event where you didn't know anyone, but everyone else seemed to stand in groups and chat like old friends? (...) Now imagine you want to contribute to an open source project, but you don't see why or how this is happening._
-— @janl, ["Sustainable Open Source"](https://writing.jan.io/2015/11/20/sustainable-open-source.html)
+— @janl, ["Duurzame open source"](https://writing.jan.io/2015/11/20/sustainable-open-source.html)
-When you start a new project, it may feel natural to keep your work private. But open source projects thrive when you document your process in public.
+Wanneer u aan een nieuw project begint, kan het natuurlijk aanvoelen om uw werk privé te houden. Maar open source-projecten gedijen goed wanneer u uw proces openbaar documenteert.
-When you write things down, more people can participate at every step of the way. You might get help on something you didn't even know you needed.
+Als je dingen opschrijft, kunnen er bij elke stap meer mensen deelnemen. U kunt misschien hulp krijgen bij iets waarvan u niet eens wist dat u het nodig had.
-Writing things down means more than just technical documentation. Any time you feel the urge to write something down or privately discuss your project, ask yourself whether you can make it public.
+Dingen opschrijven is meer dan alleen technische documentatie. Elke keer dat u de neiging voelt om iets op te schrijven of uw project privé te bespreken, vraag uzelf dan af of u het openbaar kunt maken.
-Be transparent about your project's roadmap, the types of contributions you're looking for, how contributions are reviewed, or why you made certain decisions.
+Wees transparant over de roadmap van uw project, de soorten bijdragen die u zoekt, hoe bijdragen worden beoordeeld of waarom u bepaalde beslissingen hebt genomen.
-If you notice multiple users running into the same problem, document the answers in the README.
+Als u merkt dat meerdere gebruikers tegen hetzelfde probleem aanlopen, documenteer de antwoorden dan in de README.
-For meetings, consider publishing your notes or takeaways in a relevant issue. The feedback you'll get from this level of transparency may surprise you.
+Overweeg voor vergaderingen uw aantekeningen of afhaalrestaurants te publiceren in een relevant nummer. De feedback die u van dit transparantieniveau krijgt, zal u misschien verbazen.
-Documenting everything applies to the work you do, too. If you're working on a substantial update to your project, put it into a pull request and mark it as a work in progress (WIP). That way, other people can feel involved in the process early on.
+Alles documenteren is ook van toepassing op het werk dat u doet. Als u aan een substantiële update van uw project werkt, plaatst u dit in een pull-aanvraag en markeert u het als een work in progress (_Werk in uitvoering_) (WIP). Op die manier kunnen andere mensen zich al vroeg bij het proces betrokken voelen.
-### Be responsive
+### Wees responsief
-As you [promote your project](../finding-users), people will have feedback for you. They may have questions about how things work, or need help getting started.
+Als jij [je project promoot](../finding-users), zullen mensen feedback voor je hebben. Ze hebben misschien vragen over hoe dingen werken of hebben hulp nodig om aan de slag te gaan.
-Try to be responsive when someone files an issue, submits a pull request, or asks a question about your project. When you respond quickly, people will feel they are part of a dialogue, and they'll be more enthusiastic about participating.
+Probeer responsief te zijn wanneer iemand een probleem issue, een pull-verzoek indient of een vraag stelt over uw project. Als je snel reageert, zullen mensen het gevoel hebben dat ze deel uitmaken van een dialoog en zullen ze enthousiaster zijn over deelname.
-Even if you can't review the request immediately, acknowledging it early helps increase engagement. Here's how @tdreyno responded to a pull request on [Middleman](https://github.com/middleman/middleman/pull/1466):
+Zelfs als u het verzoek niet onmiddellijk kunt beoordelen, helpt het vroegtijdig erkennen van het verzoek de betrokkenheid te vergroten. Hier is hoe @tdreyno reageerde op een pull-verzoek op [Middleman](https://github.com/middleman/middleman/pull/1466):
![Middleman pull request](/assets/images/building-community/middleman_pr.png)
-[A Mozilla study found that](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1hsJLv1ieSqtXBzd5YZusY-mB8e1VJzaeOmh8Q4VeMio/edit#slide=id.g43d857af8_0177) contributors who received code reviews within 48 hours had a much higher rate of return and repeat contribution.
+[Een Mozilla-studie zag dat](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1hsJLv1ieSqtXBzd5YZusY-mB8e1VJzaeOmh8Q4VeMio/edit#slide=id.g43d857af8_0177) bijdragers die binnen 48 uur codebeoordelingen ontvingen, een veel hoger rendement hadden en een veel hogere bijdrage.
-Conversations about your project could also be happening in other places around the internet, such as Stack Overflow, Twitter, or Reddit. You can set up notifications in some of these places so you are alerted when someone mentions your project.
+Gesprekken over uw project kunnen ook plaatsvinden op andere plaatsen op internet, zoals Stack Overflow, Twitter of Reddit. U kunt op sommige van deze plaatsen meldingen instellen, zodat u wordt gewaarschuwd wanneer iemand uw project noemt.
-### Give your community a place to congregate
+### Geef uw gemeenschap een plek om samen te komen
-There are two reasons to give your community a place to congregate.
+Er zijn twee redenen om uw gemeenschap een plek te geven om samen te komen.
-The first reason is for them. Help people get to know each other. People with common interests will inevitably want a place to talk about it. And when communication is public and accessible, anybody can read past archives to get up to speed and participate.
+De eerste reden is voor hen. Help mensen elkaar te leren kennen. Mensen met gemeenschappelijke interesses zullen onvermijdelijk een plek willen hebben om erover te praten. En als communicatie openbaar en toegankelijk is, kan iedereen archieven uit het verleden lezen om op de hoogte te blijven en deel te nemen.
-The second reason is for you. If you don't give people a public place to talk about your project, they will likely contact you directly. In the beginning, it may seem easy enough to respond to private messages "just this once". But over time, especially if your project becomes popular, you will feel exhausted. Resist the temptation to communicate with people about your project in private. Instead, direct them to a designated public channel.
+De tweede reden is voor jou. Als je mensen geen openbare plek geeft om over je project te praten, zullen ze waarschijnlijk rechtstreeks contact met je opnemen. In het begin lijkt het misschien eenvoudig genoeg om "voor een keer" op privéberichten te reageren. Maar na verloop van tijd, vooral als uw project populair wordt, zult u zich uitgeput voelen. Weersta de verleiding om privé met mensen over uw project te communiceren. Verwijs ze in plaats daarvan naar een aangewezen openbaar kanaal.
-Public communication can be as simple as directing people to open an issue instead of emailing you directly or commenting on your blog. You could also set up a mailing list, or create a Twitter account, Slack, or IRC channel for people to talk about your project. Or try all of the above!
+Openbare communicatie kan zo simpel zijn als mensen sturen om een probleem te openen in plaats van u rechtstreeks te e-mailen of te reageren op uw blog. Je kunt ook een mailinglijst opzetten, of een Twitter-account, Slack- of IRC-kanaal maken zodat mensen over je project kunnen praten. Of probeer al het bovenstaande!
-[Kubernetes kops](https://github.com/kubernetes/kops#getting-involved) sets aside office hours every other week to help community members:
+[Kubernetes kops](https://github.com/kubernetes/kops#getting-involved) reserveert om de week kantooruren om leden van de gemeenschap te helpen:
-> Kops also has time set aside every other week to offer help and guidance to the community. Kops maintainers have agreed to set aside time specifically dedicated to working with newcomers, helping with PRs, and discussing new features.
+> Kops heeft ook om de week tijd vrijgemaakt om hulp en begeleiding te bieden aan de gemeenschap. De beheerders van Kops zijn overeengekomen om tijd vrij te maken die specifiek is bedoeld voor het werken met nieuwkomers, het helpen met PR's en het bespreken van nieuwe functies.
-Notable exceptions to public communication are: 1) security issues and 2) sensitive code of conduct violations. You should always have a way for people to report these issues privately. If you don't want to use your personal email, set up a dedicated email address.
+Uitzonderingen op openbare communicatie zijn: 1) beveiligingskwesties en 2) schendingen van gevoelige gedragscodes. U moet altijd een manier hebben waarop mensen deze problemen privé kunnen melden. Als u uw persoonlijke e-mailadres niet wilt gebruiken, stelt u een speciaal e-mailadres in.
-## Growing your community
+## Je community laten groeien
-Communities are extremely powerful. That power can be a blessing or a curse, depending on how you wield it. As your project's community grows, there are ways to help it become a force of construction, not destruction.
+Gemeenschappen zijn buitengewoon krachtig. Die macht kan een zegen of een vloek zijn, afhankelijk van hoe u die uitoefent. Naarmate de gemeenschap van uw project groeit, zijn er manieren om het te helpen een bouwkracht te worden, geen vernietiging.
-### Don't tolerate bad actors
+### Sta geen slechte acteurs toe
-Any popular project will inevitably attract people who harm, rather than help, your community. They may start unnecessary debates, quibble over trivial features, or bully others.
+Elk populair project zal onvermijdelijk mensen aantrekken die uw gemeenschap schaden in plaats van helpen. Ze kunnen onnodige debatten beginnen, kibbelen over triviale kenmerken of anderen pesten.
-Do your best to adopt a zero-tolerance policy towards these types of people. If left unchecked, negative people will make other people in your community uncomfortable. They may even leave.
+Doe je best om een nultolerantiebeleid te voeren ten aanzien van dit soort mensen. Als dit niet wordt aangevinkt, zullen negatieve mensen andere mensen in uw gemeenschap ongemakkelijk maken. Ze kunnen zelfs vertrekken.
- The truth is that having a supportive community is key. I'd never be able to do this work without the help of my colleagues, friendly internet strangers, and chatty IRC channels. (...) Don't settle for less. Don't settle for assholes.
+ De waarheid is dat het hebben van een ondersteunende gemeenschap de sleutel is. Ik zou dit werk nooit kunnen doen zonder de hulp van mijn collega's, vriendelijke internetvreemdelingen en spraakzame IRC-kanalen. (...) Neem geen genoegen met minder. Neem geen genoegen met klootzakken.
+
+ _The truth is that having a supportive community is key. I'd never be able to do this work without the help of my colleagues, friendly internet strangers, and chatty IRC channels. (...) Don't settle for less. Don't settle for assholes._
— @okdistribute, ["How to Run a FOSS Project"](https://okdistribute.xyz/post/okf-de)
-Regular debates over trivial aspects of your project distracts others, including you, from focusing on important tasks. New people who arrive to your project may see these conversations and not want to participate.
+Regelmatige debatten over triviale aspecten van uw project leiden anderen, waaronder u, af om zich op belangrijke taken te concentreren. Nieuwe mensen die naar uw project komen, kunnen deze gesprekken zien en willen niet deelnemen.
-When you see negative behavior happening on your project, call it out publicly. Explain, in a kind but firm tone, why their behavior is not acceptable. If the problem persists, you may need to [ask them to leave](../code-of-conduct/#enforcing-your-code-of-conduct). Your [code of conduct](../code-of-conduct/) can be a constructive guide for these conversations.
+Als u negatief gedrag in uw project ziet gebeuren, meld dit dan in het openbaar. Leg op vriendelijke maar krachtige toon uit waarom hun gedrag niet acceptabel is. Als het probleem aanhoudt, kan het nodig zijn [om te vragen om te vertrekken](../code-of-conduct/#enforcing-your-code-of-conduct). Uw [gedragsregels](../code-of-conduct/) kan een constructieve gids zijn voor deze gesprekken.
-### Meet contributors where they're at
+### Ontmoet bijdragers waar ze zijn
-Good documentation only becomes more important as your community grows. Casual contributors, who may not otherwise be familiar with your project, read your documentation to quickly get the context they need.
+Goede documentatie wordt alleen maar belangrijker naarmate uw gemeenschap groeit. Toevallige bijdragers, die anders misschien niet bekend zijn met uw project, lezen uw documentatie om snel de context te krijgen die ze nodig hebben.
-In your CONTRIBUTING file, explicitly tell new contributors how to get started. You may even want to make a dedicated section for this purpose. [Django](https://github.com/django/django), for example, has a special landing page to welcome new contributors.
+Vertel nieuwe bijdragers in uw CONTRIBUTORS-bestand expliciet hoe ze aan de slag kunnen. Misschien wilt u voor dit doel zelfs een speciale sectie maken. [Django](https://github.com/django/django), heeft bijvoorbeeld een speciale bestemmingspagina om nieuwe bijdragers te verwelkomen.
-![Django new contributors page](/assets/images/building-community/django_new_contributors.png)
+![Django niewe bijdragers pagina](/assets/images/building-community/django_new_contributors.png)
-In your issue queue, label bugs that are suitable for different types of contributors: for example, [_"first timers only"_](https://kentcdodds.com/blog/first-timers-only), _"good first issue"_, or _"documentation"_. [These labels](https://github.com/librariesio/libraries.io/blob/6afea1a3354aef4672d9b3a9fc4cc308d60020c8/app/models/github_issue.rb#L8-L14) make it easy for someone new to your project to quickly scan your issues and get started.
+Label in uw issue wachtrij bugs die geschikt zijn voor verschillende soorten bijdragers: bijvoorbeeld [_"alleen first timers"_](https://kentcdodds.com/blog/first-timers-only), _"good first issue"_, or _"documentatie"_. [Deze labels](https://github.com/librariesio/libraries.io/blob/6afea1a3354aef4672d9b3a9fc4cc308d60020c8/app/models/github_issue.rb#L8-L14) maken het gemakkelijk voor iemand die nieuw is bij uw project om snel uw problemen te scannen en aan de slag te gaan.
-Finally, use your documentation to make people feel welcome at every step of the way.
+Gebruik ten slotte uw documentatie om ervoor te zorgen dat mensen zich bij elke stap welkom voelen.
-You will never interact with most people who land on your project. There may be contributions you didn't receive because somebody felt intimidated or didn't know where to get started. Even a few kind words can keep someone from leaving your project in frustration.
+U zult nooit contact hebben met de meeste mensen die op uw project terechtkomen. Er kunnen bijdragen zijn die u niet hebt ontvangen omdat iemand zich geïntimideerd voelde of niet wist waar hij moest beginnen. Zelfs een paar vriendelijke woorden kunnen iemand ervan weerhouden uw project gefrustreerd te verlaten.
-For example, here's how [Rubinius](https://github.com/rubinius/rubinius/) starts [its contributing guide](https://github.com/rubinius/rubinius/blob/HEAD/.github/contributing.md):
+Hier is bijvoorbeeld hoe [Rubinius](https://github.com/rubinius/rubinius/) startte [zijn bijdrage gids](https://github.com/rubinius/rubinius/blob/HEAD/.github/contributing.md):
-> We want to start off by saying thank you for using Rubinius. This project is a labor of love, and we appreciate all of the users that catch bugs, make performance improvements, and help with documentation. Every contribution is meaningful, so thank you for participating. That being said, here are a few guidelines that we ask you to follow so we can successfully address your issue.
+> Om te beginnen willen we u bedanken voor het gebruik van Rubinius. Dit project is een werk van liefde, en we waarderen alle gebruikers die bugs ontdekken, prestatieverbeteringen aanbrengen en helpen met documentatie. Elke bijdrage is zinvol, dus bedankt voor je deelname. Dat gezegd hebbende, zijn hier enkele richtlijnen die we u vragen te volgen, zodat we uw probleem met succes kunnen oplossen.
-### Share ownership of your project
+### Deel het eigendom van uw project
- Your leaders will have different opinions, as all healthy communities should! However, you need to take steps to ensure the loudest voice doesn't always win by tiring people out, and that less prominent and minority voices are heard.
+ Je leiders zullen verschillende meningen hebben, zoals alle gezonde gemeenschappen zouden moeten! U moet echter maatregelen nemen om ervoor te zorgen dat de luidste stem niet altijd wint door mensen uit te putten, en dat minder prominente stemmen en minderheidsstemmen worden gehoord.
+
+ _Your leaders will have different opinions, as all healthy communities should! However, you need to take steps to ensure the loudest voice doesn't always win by tiring people out, and that less prominent and minority voices are heard._
+
-— @sagesharp, ["What makes a good community?"](https://sage.thesharps.us/2015/10/06/what-makes-a-good-community/)
+— @sagesharp, ["Wat maakt een goede gemeenschap?"](https://sage.thesharps.us/2015/10/06/what-makes-a-good-community/)
-People are excited to contribute to projects when they feel a sense of ownership. That doesn't mean you need to turn over your project's vision or accept contributions you don't want. But the more you give credit to others, the more they'll stick around.
+Mensen zijn enthousiast om bij te dragen aan projecten als ze een gevoel van eigenaarschap voelen. Dat betekent niet dat u de visie van uw project moet overdragen of bijdragen moet accepteren die u niet wilt. Maar hoe meer je anderen erkent, hoe meer ze blijven hangen.
-See if you can find ways to share ownership with your community as much as possible. Here are some ideas:
+Kijk of je manieren kunt vinden om het eigendom zoveel mogelijk met je gemeenschap te delen. Hier zijn enkele ideeën:
-* **Resist fixing easy (non-critical) bugs.** Instead, use them as opportunities to recruit new contributors, or mentor someone who'd like to contribute. It may seem unnatural at first, but your investment will pay off over time. For example, @michaeljoseph asked a contributor to submit a pull request on a [Cookiecutter](https://github.com/audreyr/cookiecutter) issue below, rather than fix it himself.
+* **Weersta het oplossen van gemakkelijke (niet-kritieke) bugs.** Gebruik ze in plaats daarvan als kansen om nieuwe bijdragers te werven of iemand te begeleiden die een bijdrage wil leveren. In het begin lijkt het misschien onnatuurlijk, maar uw investering zal zich na verloop van tijd terugbetalen. @Michaeljoseph vroeg bijvoorbeeld een bijdrager om een pull-verzoek in te dienen voor een [Cookiecutter](https://github.com/audreyr/cookiecutter) issue hieronder, in plaats van het zelf te repareren.
![Cookiecutter issue](/assets/images/building-community/cookiecutter_submit_pr.png)
-* **Start a CONTRIBUTORS or AUTHORS file in your project** that lists everyone who's contributed to your project, like [Sinatra](https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/blob/HEAD/AUTHORS.md) does.
+* **Start een CONTRIBUTORS- of AUTHORS-bestand in uw project** met een lijst van iedereen die aan uw project heeft bijgedragen, zoals [Sinatra](https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/blob/HEAD/AUTHORS.md) doet.
-* If you've got a sizable community, **send out a newsletter or write a blog post** thanking contributors. Rust's [This Week in Rust](https://this-week-in-rust.org/) and Hoodie's [Shoutouts](http://hood.ie/blog/shoutouts-week-24.html) are two good examples.
+* Als je een omvangrijke community hebt, **stuur dan een nieuwsbrief of schrijf een blogpost** om bijdragers te bedanken. Rust's [Deze week in Rust](https://this-week-in-rust.org/) en Hoodie's [Shoutouts](http://hood.ie/blog/shoutouts-week-24.html) zijn twee goede voorbeelden.
-* **Give every contributor commit access.** @felixge found that this made people [more excited to polish their patches](https://felixge.de/2013/03/11/the-pull-request-hack.html), and he even found new maintainers for projects that he hadn't worked on in awhile.
+* **Geef elke bijdrager toegang tot commit.** @felixge ontdekte dat dit mensen [meer enthousiast maakte om hun patches op te poetsen](https://felixge.de/2013/03/11/the-pull-request-hack.html), en hij vond zelfs nieuwe beheerders voor projecten waaraan hij al een tijdje niet had gewerkt.
-* If your project is on GitHub, **move your project from your personal account to an [Organization](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-new-organization-account/)** and add at least one backup admin. Organizations make it easier to work on projects with external collaborators.
+* Als uw project zich op GitHub bevindt, **verplaats uw project dan van uw persoonlijke account naar een [Organisatie](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-new-organization-account/)** en voeg minstens één back-upbeheerder toe. Organisaties maken het gemakkelijker om met externe medewerkers aan projecten te werken.
-The reality is that [most projects only have](https://peerj.com/preprints/1233.pdf) one or two maintainers who do most of the work. The bigger your project, and the bigger your community, the easier it is to find help.
+De realiteit is dat bij [de meeste projecten]
+(https://peerj.com/preprints/1233.pdf) een of twee beheerders die het meeste werk doen. Hoe groter uw project en hoe groter uw gemeenschap, hoe gemakkelijker het is om hulp te vinden.
-While you may not always find someone to answer the call, putting a signal out there increases the chances that other people will pitch in. And the earlier you start, the sooner people can help.
+Hoewel je misschien niet altijd iemand vindt om de oproep te beantwoorden, vergroot het geven van een signaal de kans dat andere mensen meedoen. En hoe eerder je begint, hoe eerder mensen kunnen helpen.
- \[It's in your\] best interest to recruit contributors who enjoy and who are capable of doing the things that you are not. Do you enjoy coding, but not answering issues? Then identify those individuals in your community who do and let them have it.
+ \[Het is in uw belang\] om bijdragers te werven die plezier hebben en die in staat zijn om de dingen te doen die u niet bent. Houd je van coderen, maar beantwoord je geen problemen? Identificeer vervolgens die personen in uw gemeenschap die dat wel doen en laat ze het hebben.
+
+ _\[It's in your\] best interest to recruit contributors who enjoy and who are capable of doing the things that you are not. Do you enjoy coding, but not answering issues? Then identify those individuals in your community who do and let them have it._
-— @gr2m, ["Welcoming Communities"](http://hood.ie/blog/welcoming-communities.html)
+— @gr2m, ["Gastvrije gemeenschappen"](http://hood.ie/blog/welcoming-communities.html)
-## Resolving conflicts
+## Conflicten oplossen
-In the early stages of your project, making major decisions is easy. When you want to do something, you just do it.
+In de vroege stadia van uw project is het nemen van belangrijke beslissingen eenvoudig. Als je iets wilt doen, doe het dan gewoon.
-As your project becomes more popular, more people will take interest in the decisions you make. Even if you don't have a big community of contributors, if your project has a lot of users, you'll find people weighing in on decisions or raising issues of their own.
+Naarmate uw project populairder wordt, zullen meer mensen belangstelling tonen voor de beslissingen die u neemt. Zelfs als je geen grote gemeenschap van bijdragers hebt, als je project veel gebruikers heeft, zul je merken dat mensen een afweging maken bij beslissingen of hun eigen problemen aan de orde stellen.
-For the most part, if you've cultivated a friendly, respectful community and documented your processes openly, your community should be able to find resolution. But sometimes you run into an issue that's a bit harder to address.
+Als je een vriendelijke, respectvolle gemeenschap hebt ontwikkeld en je processen openlijk hebt gedocumenteerd, zou je gemeenschap voor het grootste deel een oplossing moeten kunnen vinden. Maar soms kom je een probleem tegen dat wat moeilijker op te lossen is.
-### Set the bar for kindness
+### Leg de lat voor vriendelijkheid
-When your community is grappling with a difficult issue, tempers may rise. People may become angry or frustrated and take it out on one another, or on you.
+Wanneer uw gemeenschap worstelt met een moeilijk probleem, kunnen de gemoederen stijgen. Mensen kunnen boos of gefrustreerd worden en het op elkaar of op jou afkraken.
-Your job as a maintainer is to keep these situations from escalating. Even if you have a strong opinion on the topic, try to take the position of a moderator or facilitator, rather than jumping into the fight and pushing your views. If someone is being unkind or monopolizing the conversation, [act immediately](../building-community/#dont-tolerate-bad-actors) to keep discussions civil and productive.
+Het is jouw taak als onderhouder om te voorkomen dat deze situaties escaleren. Zelfs als je een uitgesproken mening over het onderwerp hebt, probeer dan de positie van moderator of facilitator in te nemen, in plaats van de strijd aan te gaan en je mening te benadrukken. Als iemand onaardig is of het gesprek monopoliseert, [reageer meteen](../building-community/#sta-geen-slechte-acteurs-toe) discussies netjes en productief houden.
- As a project maintainer, it's extremely important to be respectful to your contributors. They often take what you say very personally.
+ Als projectonderhouder is het uiterst belangrijk om respectvol te zijn voor uw bijdragers. Ze vatten wat je zegt vaak heel persoonlijk op.
+
+ _As a project maintainer, it's extremely important to be respectful to your contributors. They often take what you say very personally._
-— @kennethreitz, ["Be Cordial or Be on Your Way"](https://www.kennethreitz.org/essays/be-cordial-or-be-on-your-way)
+— @kennethreitz, ["Wees hartelijk of ga op weg"](https://www.kennethreitz.org/essays/be-cordial-or-be-on-your-way)
-Other people are looking to you for guidance. Set a good example. You can still express disappointment, unhappiness, or concern, but do so calmly.
+Andere mensen vragen je om advies. Geef een goed voorbeeld. U kunt nog steeds teleurstelling, ongeluk of bezorgdheid uiten, maar doe dit rustig.
-Keeping your cool isn't easy, but demonstrating leadership improves the health of your community. The internet thanks you.
+Het hoofd koel houden is niet eenvoudig, maar leiderschap tonen verbetert de gezondheid van uw gemeenschap. Het internet dankt je.
-### Treat your README as a constitution
+### Behandel uw README als een grondwet
-Your README is [more than just a set of instructions](../starting-a-project/#writing-a-readme). It's also a place to talk about your goals, product vision, and roadmap. If people are overly focused on debating the merit of a particular feature, it may help to revisit your README and talk about the higher vision of your project. Focusing on your README also depersonalizes the conversation, so you can have a constructive discussion.
+Uw README is [meer dan alleen een reeks instructies](../starting-a-project/#writing-a-readme). Het is ook een plek om te praten over uw doelen, productvisie en roadmap. Als mensen overdreven gefocust zijn op het bespreken van de waarde van een bepaalde functie, kan het helpen om je README opnieuw te bekijken en te praten over de hogere visie van je project. Focussen op je README maakt het gesprek ook onpersoonlijk, zodat je een constructieve discussie kunt voeren.
-### Focus on the journey, not the destination
+### Concentreer u op de reis, niet op de bestemming
-Some projects use a voting process to make major decisions. While sensible at first glance, voting emphasizes getting to an "answer," rather than listening to and addressing each other's concerns.
+Sommige projecten gebruiken een stemproces om belangrijke beslissingen te nemen. Hoewel stemmen op het eerste gezicht verstandig zijn, legt het de nadruk op het vinden van een 'antwoord' in plaats van naar elkaars zorgen te luisteren en erop in te gaan.
-Voting can become political, where community members feel pressured to do each other favors or vote a certain way. Not everybody votes, either, whether it's the [silent majority](https://ben.balter.com/2016/03/08/optimizing-for-power-users-and-edge-cases/#the-silent-majority-of-users) in your community, or current users who didn't know a vote was taking place.
+Stemmen kan politiek worden, waarbij leden van de gemeenschap onder druk gezet worden om elkaar goed te doen of op een bepaalde manier te stemmen. Ook niet iedereen stemt of het de [stille meerderheid](https://ben.balter.com/2016/03/08/optimizing-for-power-users-and-edge-cases/#the-silent-majority-of-users) is in uw gemeenschap, of huidige gebruikers die niet wisten dat er gestemd werd.
-Sometimes, voting is a necessary tiebreaker. As much as you are able, however, emphasize ["consensus seeking"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus-seeking_decision-making) rather than consensus.
+Soms is stemmen een noodzakelijk kwaad. Zoveel als je kunt, leg echter de nadruk op ["consensus zoeken"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus-seeking_decision-making) in plaats van consensus.
-Under a consensus seeking process, community members discuss major concerns until they feel they have been adequately heard. When only minor concerns remain, the community moves forward. "Consensus seeking" acknowledges that a community may not be able to reach a perfect answer. Instead, it prioritizes listening and discussion.
+In het kader van een proces voor het zoeken naar consensus, bespreken leden van de gemeenschap belangrijke zorgen totdat ze vinden dat ze voldoende zijn gehoord. Als er nog maar kleine zorgen zijn, gaat de gemeenschap vooruit. "Consensus zoeken" erkent dat een gemeenschap misschien niet in staat zal zijn om tot een perfect antwoord te komen. In plaats daarvan geeft het prioriteit aan luisteren en discussiëren.
- Part of the reason why a voting system doesn't exist for Atom Issues is because the Atom team isn't going to follow a voting system in all cases. Sometimes we have to choose what we feel is right even if it is unpopular. (...) What I can offer and pledge to do...is that it is my job to listen to the community.
+ Een deel van de reden waarom er geen stemsysteem bestaat voor Atom Issues is dat het Atom-team niet in alle gevallen een stemsysteem gaat volgen. Soms moeten we kiezen wat we vinden dat juist is, zelfs als het niet populair is. (...) Wat ik kan bieden en beloven te doen ... is dat het mijn taak is om naar de gemeenschap te luisteren.
+
+ _Part of the reason why a voting system doesn't exist for Atom Issues is because the Atom team isn't going to follow a voting system in all cases. Sometimes we have to choose what we feel is right even if it is unpopular. (...) What I can offer and pledge to do...is that it is my job to listen to the community._
-— @lee-dohm on [Atom's decisionmaking process](https://discuss.atom.io/t/prioritize-issues-feature-requests-based-on-voting-system/27642/2)
+— @lee-dohm on [Atom's besluitvormingsproces](https://discuss.atom.io/t/prioritize-issues-feature-requests-based-on-voting-system/27642/2)
-Even if you don't actually adopt a consensus seeking process, as a project maintainer, it's important that people know you are listening. Making other people feel heard, and committing to resolving their concerns, goes a long way to diffuse sensitive situations. Then, follow up on your words with actions.
+Zelfs als u niet echt een consensuszoekproces toepast, is het als projectonderhouder belangrijk dat mensen weten dat u luistert. Door ervoor te zorgen dat andere mensen zich gehoord voelen en zich ertoe verbinden hun zorgen op te lossen, kunnen gevoelige situaties aanzienlijk worden verspreid. Volg vervolgens uw woorden met daden.
-Don't rush into a decision for the sake of having a resolution. Make sure that everybody feels heard and that all information has been made public before moving toward a resolution.
+Overhaast geen beslissing om een oplossing te hebben. Zorg ervoor dat iedereen zich gehoord voelt en dat alle informatie openbaar is gemaakt voordat u naar een oplossing gaat.
-### Keep the conversation focused on action
+### Houd het gesprek gericht op actie
-Discussion is important, but there is a difference between productive and unproductive conversations.
+Discussie is belangrijk, maar er is een verschil tussen productieve en onproductieve gesprekken.
-Encourage discussion so long as it is actively moving towards resolution. If it's clear that conversation is languishing or going off-topic, jabs are getting personal, or people are quibbling about minor details, it's time to shut it down.
+Moedig discussie aan zolang deze actief naar een oplossing toe evolueert. Als het duidelijk is dat een gesprek wegkwijnt of afwijkt van het onderwerp, prikkels persoonlijk worden of mensen kibbelen over kleine details, is het tijd om het af te sluiten.
-Allowing these conversations to continue is not only bad for the issue at hand, but bad for the health of your community. It sends a message that these types of conversations are permitted or even encouraged, and it can discourage people from raising or resolving future issues.
+Deze gesprekken laten doorgaan is niet alleen slecht voor het betreffende probleem, maar ook slecht voor de gezondheid van uw gemeenschap. Het geeft een bericht dat dit soort gesprekken is toegestaan of zelfs aangemoedigd, en het kan mensen ontmoedigen om toekomstige problemen aan de orde te stellen of op te lossen.
-With every point made by you or by others, ask yourself, _"How does this bring us closer to a resolution?"_
+Stel uzelf bij elk punt dat door u of anderen wordt gemaakt, de vraag: _"Hoe brengt dit ons dichter bij een oplossing?"_
-If the conversation is starting to unravel, ask the group, _"Which steps should we take next?"_ to refocus the conversation.
+Als het gesprek begint te ontrafelen, vraag dan aan de groep: _"Welke stappen moeten we hierna nemen?"_ Om het gesprek opnieuw te focussen.
-If a conversation clearly isn't going anywhere, there are no clear actions to be taken, or the appropriate action has already been taken, close the issue and explain why you closed it.
+Als een gesprek duidelijk nergens heen gaat, er geen duidelijke acties kunnen worden ondernomen, of als de juiste actie al is ondernomen, sluit dan het probleem af en leg uit waarom je het hebt gesloten.
- Guiding a thread toward usefulness without being pushy is an art. It won't work to simply admonish people to stop wasting their time, or to ask them not to post unless they have something constructive to say. (...) Instead, you have to suggest conditions for further progress: give people a route, a path to follow that leads to the results you want, yet without sounding like you're dictating conduct.
+ Een draad naar bruikbaarheid leiden zonder opdringerig te zijn, is een kunst. Het zal niet werken om mensen simpelweg te vermanen om te stoppen met het verspillen van hun tijd, of om hen te vragen niet te posten tenzij ze iets constructiefs te melden hebben. (...) In plaats daarvan moet je voorwaarden stellen voor verdere vooruitgang: geef mensen een route, een pad om te volgen dat leidt tot de resultaten die je wilt, maar zonder dat het lijkt alsof je gedrag dicteert.
+
+ _Guiding a thread toward usefulness without being pushy is an art. It won't work to simply admonish people to stop wasting their time, or to ask them not to post unless they have something constructive to say. (...) Instead, you have to suggest conditions for further progress: give people a route, a path to follow that leads to the results you want, yet without sounding like you're dictating conduct._
-— @kfogel, [_Producing OSS_](https://producingoss.com/en/producingoss.html#common-pitfalls)
+— @kfogel, [_OSS Produceren_](https://producingoss.com/en/producingoss.html#common-pitfalls)
-### Pick your battles wisely
+### Kies je gevechten verstandig
-Context is important. Consider who is involved in the discussion and how they represent the rest of the community.
+Context is belangrijk. Bedenk wie er bij de discussie betrokken is en hoe zij de rest van de gemeenschap vertegenwoordigen.
-Is everybody in the community upset about, or even engaged with, this issue? Or is a lone troublemaker? Don't forget to consider your silent community members, not just the active voices.
+Is iedereen in de gemeenschap boos over of zelfs betrokken bij deze kwestie? Of is het een eenzame onruststoker? Vergeet niet rekening te houden met uw stille gemeenschapsleden, niet alleen met de actieve stemmen.
-If the issue does not represent the broader needs of your community, you may just need to acknowledge the concerns of a few people. If this is a recurring issue without a clear resolution, point them to previous discussions on the topic and close the thread.
+Als het probleem niet de bredere behoeften van uw gemeenschap weerspiegelt, moet u misschien de zorgen van een paar mensen erkennen. Als dit een terugkerend probleem is zonder een duidelijke oplossing, verwijs ze dan naar eerdere discussies over het onderwerp en sluit de thread.
-### Identify a community tiebreaker
+### Identificeer een schiftingspercentage van de gemeenschap
-With a good attitude and clear communication, most difficult situations are resolvable. However, even in a productive conversation, there can simply be a difference in opinion on how to proceed. In these cases, identify an individual or group of people that can serve as a tiebreaker.
+Met een goede instelling en duidelijke communicatie zijn de meeste moeilijke situaties op te lossen. Maar zelfs in een productief gesprek kan er eenvoudig een verschil in mening zijn over hoe verder te gaan. Identificeer in deze gevallen een persoon of een groep mensen die als schiftingsvariant kunnen dienen.
-A tiebreaker could be the primary maintainer of the project, or it could be a small group of people who make a decision based on voting. Ideally, you've identified a tiebreaker and the associated process in a GOVERNANCE file before you ever have to use it.
+Een doorslag kan de primaire instandhouder van het project zijn, of het kan een kleine groep mensen zijn die een beslissing neemt op basis van stemmen. Idealiter heb je een schiftingspercentage en het bijbehorende proces geïdentificeerd in een GOVERNANCE-bestand voordat je het ooit hoeft te gebruiken.
-Your tiebreaker should be a last resort. Divisive issues are an opportunity for your community to grow and learn. Embrace these opportunities and use a collaborative process to move to a resolution wherever possible.
+Je schifting zou een laatste redmiddel moeten zijn. Kwesties die verdeeldheid zaaien, zijn een kans voor uw gemeenschap om te groeien en te leren. Omarm deze kansen en gebruik een samenwerkingsproces om waar mogelijk tot een oplossing te komen.
-## Community is the ❤️ of open source
+## Community is het ❤️ van open source
-Healthy, thriving communities fuel the thousands of hours poured into open source every week. Many contributors point to other people as the reason for working - or not working - on open source. By learning how to tap into that power constructively, you'll help someone out there have an unforgettable open source experience.
+Gezonde, bloeiende gemeenschappen voeden de duizenden uren die elke week in open source worden gestoken. Veel bijdragers wijzen op andere mensen als de reden om wel of niet aan open source te werken. Door constructief te leren hoe je die kracht kunt aanboren, help je iemand daarbuiten een onvergetelijke open source-ervaring te hebben.
diff --git a/_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md b/_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md
index 4b4d7963bb1..1dcb6feadcc 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ Once you've established leadership roles, don't forget to document how people ca
Tools like [Vossibility](https://github.com/icecrime/vossibility-stack) can help you publicly track who is (or isn't) making contributions to the project. Documenting this information avoids the community perception that maintainers are a clique that makes its decisions privately.
-Finally, if your project is on GitHub, consider moving your project from your personal account to an Organization and adding at least one backup admin. [GitHub Organizations](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-new-organization-account/) make it easier to manage permissions and multiple repositories and protect your project's legacy through [shared ownership](../building-community/#share-ownership-of-your-project).
+Finally, if your project is on GitHub, consider moving your project from your personal account to an Organization and adding at least one backup admin. [GitHub Organizations](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-new-organization-account/) make it easier to manage permissions and multiple repositories and protect your project's legacy through [shared ownership](../building-community/#deel-het-eigendom-van-uw-project).
## When should I give someone commit access?
From 54e6f184c300922a81ce1d0898a511e99a0b8ee6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley de Groot
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:27:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 066/749] Article 'Code of Conduct'
---
_articles/nl/building-community.md | 2 +-
_articles/nl/code-of-conduct.md | 99 ++++++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/nl/building-community.md b/_articles/nl/building-community.md
index 28c9ef3bded..82be15f49b5 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/building-community.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/building-community.md
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ Doe je best om een nultolerantiebeleid te voeren ten aanzien van dit soort mense
Regelmatige debatten over triviale aspecten van uw project leiden anderen, waaronder u, af om zich op belangrijke taken te concentreren. Nieuwe mensen die naar uw project komen, kunnen deze gesprekken zien en willen niet deelnemen.
-Als u negatief gedrag in uw project ziet gebeuren, meld dit dan in het openbaar. Leg op vriendelijke maar krachtige toon uit waarom hun gedrag niet acceptabel is. Als het probleem aanhoudt, kan het nodig zijn [om te vragen om te vertrekken](../code-of-conduct/#enforcing-your-code-of-conduct). Uw [gedragsregels](../code-of-conduct/) kan een constructieve gids zijn voor deze gesprekken.
+Als u negatief gedrag in uw project ziet gebeuren, meld dit dan in het openbaar. Leg op vriendelijke maar krachtige toon uit waarom hun gedrag niet acceptabel is. Als het probleem aanhoudt, kan het nodig zijn [om te vragen om te vertrekken](../code-of-conduct/#handhaving-van-uw-gedragscode). Uw [gedragsregels](../code-of-conduct/) kan een constructieve gids zijn voor deze gesprekken.
### Ontmoet bijdragers waar ze zijn
diff --git a/_articles/nl/code-of-conduct.md b/_articles/nl/code-of-conduct.md
index e70bd41632e..d59157706bf 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/code-of-conduct.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/code-of-conduct.md
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
---
lang: nl
-title: Your Code of Conduct
-description: Facilitate healthy and constructive community behavior by adopting and enforcing a code of conduct.
+title: Uw gedragscode
+description: Faciliteer gezond en constructief gedrag in de gemeenschap door een gedragscode aan te nemen en af te dwingen.
class: coc
toc:
- why-do-i-need-a-code-of-conduct: "Why do I need a code of conduct?"
- establishing-a-code-of-conduct: "Establishing a code of conduct"
- deciding-how-youll-enforce-your-code-of-conduct: "Deciding how you’ll enforce your code of conduct"
- enforcing-your-code-of-conduct: "Enforcing your code of conduct"
- your-responsibilities-as-a-maintainer: "Your responsibilities as a maintainer"
+ why-do-i-need-a-code-of-conduct: "Waarom heb ik een gedragscode nodig?"
+ establishing-a-code-of-conduct: "Opstellen van een gedragscode"
+ deciding-how-youll-enforce-your-code-of-conduct: "Beslissen hoe u uw gedragscode handhaaft"
+ enforcing-your-code-of-conduct: "Handhaving van uw gedragscode"
+ your-responsibilities-as-a-maintainer: "Uw verantwoordelijkheden als open source-onderhouder"
order: 8
image: /assets/images/cards/coc.png
related:
@@ -16,15 +16,15 @@ related:
- leadership
---
-## Why do I need a code of conduct?
+## Waarom heb ik een gedragscode nodig?
-A code of conduct is a document that establishes expectations for behavior for your project's participants. Adopting, and enforcing, a code of conduct can help create a positive social atmosphere for your community.
+Een gedragscode is een document waarin de verwachtingen voor het gedrag van de deelnemers aan uw project worden vastgelegd. Door een gedragscode aan te nemen en af te dwingen, kunt u een positieve sociale sfeer voor uw gemeenschap creëren.
-Codes of conduct help protect not just your participants, but yourself. If you maintain a project, you may find that unproductive attitudes from other participants can make you feel drained or unhappy about your work over time.
+Gedragscodes helpen niet alleen uw deelnemers te beschermen, maar ook uzelf. Als u een project onderhoudt, zult u merken dat een onproductieve houding van andere deelnemers u na verloop van tijd uitgeput of ongelukkig kan maken met uw werk.
-A code of conduct empowers you to facilitate healthy, constructive community behavior. Being proactive reduces the likelihood that you, or others, will become fatigued with your project, and helps you take action when someone does something you don't agree with.
+Een gedragscode stelt je in staat om gezond, constructief gemeenschapsgedrag te faciliteren. Door proactief te zijn, wordt de kans kleiner dat u of anderen vermoeid raken door uw project, en kunt u actie ondernemen wanneer iemand iets doet waar u het niet mee eens bent.
-## Establishing a code of conduct
+## Opstellen van een gedragscode
Try to establish a code of conduct as early as possible: ideally, when you first create your project.
@@ -41,80 +41,85 @@ The [Django Code of Conduct](https://www.djangoproject.com/conduct/) and the [Ci
Place a CODE_OF_CONDUCT file in your project's root directory, and make it visible to your community by linking it from your CONTRIBUTING or README file.
-## Deciding how you'll enforce your code of conduct
+## Beslissen hoe u uw gedragscode handhaaft
- A code of conduct that isn't (or can't be) enforced is worse than no code of conduct at all: it sends the message that the values in the code of conduct aren't actually important or respected in your community.
+ Een gedragscode die niet (of niet) kan worden afgedwongen, is erger dan helemaal geen gedragscode: het geeft de boodschap af dat de waarden in de gedragscode niet echt belangrijk of gerespecteerd worden in uw gemeenschap.
+
+ _A code of conduct that isn't (or can't be) enforced is worse than no code of conduct at all: it sends the message that the values in the code of conduct aren't actually important or respected in your community._
— [Ada Initiative](https://adainitiative.org/2014/02/18/howto-design-a-code-of-conduct-for-your-community/)
-You should explain how your code of conduct will be enforced **_before_** a violation occurs. There are several reasons to do so:
+U moet uitleggen hoe uw gedragscode wordt gehandhaafd **_voordat_** een overtreding plaatsvindt. Er zijn verschillende redenen om dit te doen:
-* It demonstrates that you are serious about taking action when it's needed.
+* Het toont aan dat u serieus actie onderneemt wanneer dat nodig is.
-* Your community will feel more reassured that complaints actually get reviewed.
+* Uw gemeenschap zal zich meer gerustgesteld voelen dat klachten daadwerkelijk worden beoordeeld.
-* You'll reassure your community that the review process is fair and transparent, should they ever find themselves investigated for a violation.
+* U verzekert uw gemeenschap ervan dat het beoordelingsproces eerlijk en transparant is, mochten ze ooit worden onderzocht op een overtreding.
-You should give people a private way (such as an email address) to report a code of conduct violation and explain who receives that report. It could be a maintainer, a group of maintainers, or a code of conduct working group.
+Geef mensen een privé manier (zoals een e-mailadres) om een schending van de gedragscode te melden en leg uit wie die melding ontvangt. Het kan een onderhouder, een groep beheerders of een werkgroep gedragscode zijn.
-Don't forget that someone might want to report a violation about a person who receives those reports. In this case, give them an option to report violations to someone else. For example, @ctb and @mr-c [explain on their project](https://github.com/dib-lab/khmer/blob/HEAD/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.rst), [khmer](https://github.com/dib-lab/khmer):
+Vergeet niet dat iemand misschien een overtreding wil melden over een persoon die deze meldingen ontvangt. Geef ze in dat geval de mogelijkheid om overtredingen aan iemand anders te melden. Bijvoorbeeld @ctb en @mr-c [explain on their project](https://github.com/dib-lab/khmer/blob/HEAD/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.rst), [khmer](https://github.com/dib-lab/khmer):
-> Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be reported by emailing **khmer-project@idyll.org** which only goes to C. Titus Brown and Michael R. Crusoe. To report an issue involving either of them please email **Judi Brown Clarke, Ph.D.** the Diversity Director at the BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, an NSF Center for Science and Technology.*
+> Gevallen van beledigend, intimiderend of anderszins onaanvaardbaar gedrag kunnen worden gemeld door een e-mail te sturen naar **khmer-project@idyll.org**, dat alleen naar C. Titus Brown en Michael R. Crusoe gaat. Om een probleem te melden waarbij een van hen betrokken is, kunt u een e-mail sturen naar **Judi Brown Clarke, Ph.D.** de Diversity Director van het BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, een NSF Center for Science and Technology.
+>
+> _Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be reported by emailing **khmer-project@idyll.org** which only goes to C. Titus Brown and Michael R. Crusoe. To report an issue involving either of them please email **Judi Brown Clarke, Ph.D.** the Diversity Director at the BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, an NSF Center for Science and Technology.*_
-For inspiration, check out Django's [enforcement manual](https://www.djangoproject.com/conduct/enforcement-manual/) (though you may not need something this comprehensive, depending on the size of your project).
+Voor inspiratie, bekijk Django's [handhavingshandboek](https://www.djangoproject.com/conduct/enforcement-manual/) (hoewel je zoiets alomvattends misschien niet nodig hebt, afhankelijk van de grootte van je project).
-## Enforcing your code of conduct
+## Handhaving van uw gedragscode
-Sometimes, despite your best efforts, somebody will do something that violates this code. There are several ways to address negative or harmful behavior when it comes up.
+Soms, ondanks uw beste inspanningen, zal iemand iets doen dat in strijd is met deze code. Er zijn verschillende manieren om negatief of schadelijk gedrag aan te pakken als het zich voordoet.
-### Gather information about the situation
+### Verzamel informatie over de situatie
-Treat each community member's voice as important as your own. If you receive a report that someone violated the code of conduct, take it seriously and investigate the matter, even if it does not match your own experience with that person. Doing so signals to your community that you value their perspective and trust their judgment.
+Behandel de stem van elk communitylid net zo belangrijk als die van jou. Als u een melding ontvangt dat iemand de gedragscode heeft geschonden, neem deze dan serieus en onderzoek de zaak, zelfs als deze niet overeenkomt met uw eigen ervaring met die persoon. Door dit te doen, geeft u uw gemeenschap aan dat u hun perspectief waardeert en hun oordeel vertrouwt.
-The community member in question may be a repeat offender who consistently makes others feel uncomfortable, or they may have only said or done something once. Both can be grounds for taking action, depending on context.
+Het gemeenschapslid in kwestie kan een recidiverende overtreder zijn die anderen consequent een ongemakkelijk gevoel geeft, of ze hebben misschien maar één keer iets gezegd of gedaan. Beide kunnen aanleiding zijn om actie te ondernemen, afhankelijk van de context.
-Before you respond, give yourself time to understand what happened. Read through the person's past comments and conversations to better understand who they are and why they might have acted in such a way. Try to gather perspectives other than your own about this person and their behavior.
+Geef uzelf de tijd om te begrijpen wat er is gebeurd voordat u reageert. Lees de eerdere opmerkingen en gesprekken van de persoon door om beter te begrijpen wie ze zijn en waarom ze zich misschien op zo'n manier hebben gedragen. Probeer andere dan de uwe perspectieven te verzamelen over deze persoon en zijn gedrag.
- Don’t get pulled into an argument. Don’t get sidetracked into dealing with someone else’s behavior before you’ve finished dealing with the matter at hand. Focus on what you need.
+ Laat je niet verleiden tot ruzie. Laat u niet op een zijspoor zetten om met het gedrag van iemand anders om te gaan voordat u klaar bent met het afhandelen van de kwestie. Concentreer u op wat u nodig heeft.
+
-— Stephanie Zvan, ["So You've Got Yourself a Policy. Now What?"](https://the-orbit.net/almostdiamonds/2014/04/10/so-youve-got-yourself-a-policy-now-what/)
+— Stephanie Zvan, ["Dus je hebt een beleid. Wat nu?"](https://the-orbit.net/almostdiamonds/2014/04/10/so-youve-got-yourself-a-policy-now-what/)
-### Take appropriate action
+### Onderneem passende maatregelen
-After gathering and processing sufficient information, you'll need to decide what to do. As you consider your next steps, remember that your goal as a moderator is to foster a safe, respectful, and collaborative environment. Consider not only how to deal with the situation in question, but how your response will affect the rest of your community's behavior and expectations moving forward.
+Nadat u voldoende informatie heeft verzameld en verwerkt, moet u beslissen wat u gaat doen. Bedenk bij het overwegen van uw volgende stappen dat het uw doel als moderator is om een veilige, respectvolle en samenwerkende omgeving te creëren. Bedenk niet alleen hoe u met de situatie in kwestie om moet gaan, maar ook hoe uw reactie het gedrag en de verwachtingen van uw gemeenschap in de toekomst zal beïnvloeden.
-When somebody reports a code of conduct violation, it is your, not their, job to handle it. Sometimes, the reporter is disclosing information at great risk to their career, reputation, or physical safety. Forcing them to confront their harasser could put the reporter in a compromising position. You should handle direct communication with the person in question, unless the reporter explicitly requests otherwise.
+Wanneer iemand een overtreding van de gedragscode meldt, is het uw taak, niet hun taak om ermee om te gaan. Soms geeft de melder informatie vrij die een groot risico inhoudt voor zijn carrière, reputatie of fysieke veiligheid. Door hen te dwingen hun dader te confronteren, zou de verslaggever in een compromitterende positie kunnen komen. U dient de directe communicatie met de persoon in kwestie af te handelen, tenzij de melder uitdrukkelijk anders verzoekt.
-There are a few ways you might respond to a code of conduct violation:
+Er zijn een paar manieren waarop u kunt reageren op een overtreding van de gedragscode:
-* **Give the person in question a public warning** and explain how their behavior negatively impacted others, preferably in the channel where it occurred. Where possible, public communication conveys to the rest of the community that you take the code of conduct seriously. Be kind, but firm in your communication.
+* **Geef de persoon in kwestie een openbare waarschuwing** en leg uit hoe zijn gedrag een negatieve invloed heeft gehad op anderen, bij voorkeur in het kanaal waar het plaatsvond. Waar mogelijk maakt openbare communicatie aan de rest van de gemeenschap duidelijk dat u de gedragscode serieus neemt. Wees vriendelijk, maar standvastig in uw communicatie.
-* **Privately reach out to the person** in question to explain how their behavior negatively impacted others. You may want to use a private communication channel if the situation involves sensitive personal information. If you communicate with someone privately, it's a good idea to CC those who first reported the situation, so they know you took action. Ask the reporting person for consent before CCing them.
+* **Neem persoonlijk contact op met de persoon in kwestie** om uit te leggen hoe zijn gedrag een negatieve invloed heeft op anderen. U kunt een privé-communicatiekanaal gebruiken als het om gevoelige persoonlijke informatie gaat. Als je privé met iemand communiceert, is het een goed idee om diegenen die de situatie voor het eerst hebben gemeld te CC te geven, zodat ze weten dat je actie hebt ondernomen. Vraag de melder om toestemming voordat u een CC invoert.
-Sometimes, a resolution cannot be reached. The person in question may become aggressive or hostile when confronted or does not change their behavior. In this situation, you may want to consider taking stronger action. For example:
+Soms kan er geen oplossing worden gevonden. De persoon in kwestie kan agressief of vijandig worden wanneer hij wordt geconfronteerd, of verandert zijn gedrag niet. In deze situatie kunt u overwegen om krachtigere maatregelen te nemen. Bijvoorbeeld:
-* **Suspend the person** in question from the project, enforced through a temporary ban on participating in any aspect of the project
+* **Schorsing van de persoon** in kwestie van het project, afgedwongen door een tijdelijk verbod op deelname aan enig aspect van het project
-* **Permanently ban** the person from the project
+* **Bannen** de persoon permanent van het project
-Banning members should not be taken lightly and represents a permanent and irreconcilable difference of perspectives. You should only take these measures when it is clear that a resolution cannot be reached.
+Het verbieden van leden moet niet lichtvaardig worden opgevat en vertegenwoordigt een permanent en onverenigbaar verschil in perspectieven. U dient deze maatregelen alleen te nemen als het duidelijk is dat er geen oplossing kan worden gevonden.
-## Your responsibilities as a maintainer
+## Uw verantwoordelijkheden als open source-onderhouder
-A code of conduct is not a law that is enforced arbitrarily. You are the enforcer of the code of conduct and it's your responsibility to follow the rules that the code of conduct establishes.
+Een gedragscode is geen wet die willekeurig wordt gehandhaafd. U bent de handhaver van de gedragscode en het is uw verantwoordelijkheid om de regels te volgen die in de gedragscode zijn vastgelegd.
-As a maintainer you establish the guidelines for your community and enforce those guidelines according to the rules set forth in your code of conduct. This means taking any report of a code of conduct violation seriously. The reporter is owed a thorough and fair review of their complaint. If you determine that the behavior that they reported is not a violation, communicate that clearly to them and explain why you're not going to take action on it. What they do with that is up to them: tolerate the behavior that they had an issue with, or stop participating in the community.
+Als onderhouder stelt u de richtlijnen voor uw gemeenschap op en handhaaft u die richtlijnen volgens de regels die in uw gedragscode zijn uiteengezet. Dit betekent dat elke melding van een overtreding van de gedragscode serieus wordt genomen. De melder is een grondige en eerlijke beoordeling van zijn klacht verschuldigd. Als u vaststelt dat het gedrag dat zij hebben gemeld geen overtreding is, communiceer dat dan duidelijk aan hen en leg uit waarom u er geen actie tegen gaat ondernemen. Wat ze daarmee doen, is aan hen: tolereer het gedrag waarmee ze een probleem hadden, of stop met deelnemen aan de gemeenschap.
-A report of behavior that doesn't _technically_ violate the code of conduct may still indicate that there is a problem in your community, and you should investigate this potential problem and act accordingly. This may include revising your code of conduct to clarify acceptable behavior and/or talking to the person whose behavior was reported and telling them that while they did not violate the code of conduct, they are skirting the edge of what is expected and are making certain participants feel uncomfortable.
+Een melding van gedrag dat _technisch_ niet in strijd is met de gedragscode, kan nog steeds aangeven dat er een probleem is in uw gemeenschap, en u dient dit potentiële probleem te onderzoeken en dienovereenkomstig te handelen. Dit kan het herzien van uw gedragscode omvatten om acceptabel gedrag te verduidelijken en / of praten met de persoon wiens gedrag werd gemeld en hen vertellen dat hoewel ze de gedragscode niet hebben overtreden, ze de rand van wat wordt verwacht niet overschrijden en ervoor zorgen dat deelnemers voelen zich ongemakkelijk.
-In the end, as a maintainer, you set and enforce the standards for acceptable behavior. You have the ability to shape the community values of the project, and participants expect you to enforce those values in a fair and even-handed way.
+Uiteindelijk bepaal en handhaaf je als onderhouder de normen voor acceptabel gedrag. Je hebt het vermogen om de gemeenschapswaarden van het project vorm te geven en deelnemers verwachten dat je die waarden op een eerlijke en evenwichtige manier afdwingt.
-## Encourage the behavior you want to see in the world 🌎
+## Moedig het gedrag aan dat u in de wereld wilt zien 🌎
-When a project seems hostile or unwelcoming, even if it's just one person whose behavior is tolerated by others, you risk losing many more contributors, some of whom you may never even meet. It's not always easy to adopt or enforce a code of conduct, but fostering a welcoming environment will help your community grow.
+Als een project vijandig of onwelkom lijkt, zelfs als het maar één persoon is wiens gedrag door anderen wordt getolereerd, loop je het risico veel meer bijdragers te verliezen, van wie je sommigen misschien nooit zult ontmoeten. Het is niet altijd gemakkelijk om een gedragscode aan te nemen of af te dwingen, maar door een gastvrije omgeving te creëren, kan uw gemeenschap groeien.
From c0554d6e5a06b6f27ab9afb515488098e66ec5ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley de Groot
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:45:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 067/749] Article ' Finding Users'
---
_articles/nl/finding-users.md | 140 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/nl/finding-users.md b/_articles/nl/finding-users.md
index 1d1cd099656..195d1b50e06 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/finding-users.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/finding-users.md
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
---
lang: nl
-title: Finding Users for Your Project
-description: Help your open source project grow by getting it in the hands of happy users.
+title: Gebruikers zoeken voor uw project
+description: Help uw open source-project te groeien door het in handen te krijgen van tevreden gebruikers.
class: finding
toc:
- spreading-the-word: "Spreading the word"
- figure-out-your-message: "Figure out your message"
- help-people-find-and-follow-your-project: "Help people find and follow your project"
- go-where-your-projects-audience-is-online: "Go where your project’s audience is (online)"
- go-where-your-projects-audience-is-offline: "Go where your project’s audience is (offline)"
- build-a-reputation: "Build a reputation"
+ spreading-the-word: "Het woord verspreiden"
+ figure-out-your-message: "Zoek uit wat je bericht is"
+ help-people-find-and-follow-your-project: "Help mensen uw project te vinden en te volgen"
+ go-where-your-projects-audience-is-online: "Ga waar het publiek van uw project is (online)"
+ go-where-your-projects-audience-is-offline: "Ga waar het publiek van uw project is (offline)"
+ build-a-reputation: "Bouw een reputatie op"
order: 3
image: /assets/images/cards/finding.png
related:
@@ -17,147 +17,163 @@ related:
- building
---
-## Spreading the word
+## Het woord verspreiden
-There's no rule that says you have to promote an open source project when you launch. There are many fulfilling reasons to work in open source that have nothing to do with popularity. Instead of hoping others will find and use your open source project, you have to spread the word about your hard work!
+Er is geen regel die zegt dat u een open source-project moet promoten wanneer u start. Er zijn veel goede redenen om in open source te werken die niets met populariteit te maken hebben. In plaats van te hopen dat anderen uw open source-project zullen vinden en gebruiken, moet u het woord over uw harde werk verspreiden!
-## Figure out your message
+## Zoek uit wat je bericht is
-Before you start the actual work of promoting your project, you should be able to explain what it does, and why it matters.
+Voordat u begint met het eigenlijke werk van het promoten van uw project, moet u kunnen uitleggen wat het doet en waarom het ertoe doet.
-What makes your project different or interesting? Why did you create it? Answering these questions for yourself will help you communicate your project's significance.
+Wat maakt uw project anders of interessant? Waarom heb je het gemaakt? Door deze vragen voor uzelf te beantwoorden, kunt u de betekenis van uw project overbrengen.
-Remember that people get involved as users, and eventually become contributors, because your project solves a problem for them. As you think about your project's message and value, try to view them through the lens of what _users and contributors_ might want.
+Onthoud dat mensen erbij betrokken raken als gebruikers en uiteindelijk bijdragen worden, omdat uw project een probleem voor hen oplost. Terwijl je nadenkt over de boodschap en waarde van je project, probeer ze dan te bekijken door de lens van wat _gebruikers en bijdragers_ zouden kunnen willen.
-For example, @robb uses code examples to clearly communicate why his project, [Cartography](https://github.com/robb/Cartography), is useful:
+@robb gebruikt bijvoorbeeld codevoorbeelden om duidelijk te communiceren waarom zijn project,[Cartography](https://github.com/robb/Cartography), nuttig is:
![Cartography README](/assets/images/finding-users/cartography.jpg)
-For a deeper dive into messaging, check out Mozilla's ["Personas and Pathways"](https://mozillascience.github.io/working-open-workshop/personas_pathways/) exercise for developing user personas.
+Voor een diepere duik in berichten, bekijk Mozilla's ["Persona's en paden"](https://mozillascience.github.io/working-open-workshop/personas_pathways/) oefening voor het ontwikkelen van gebruikerspersonages.
-## Help people find and follow your project
+## Help mensen uw project te vinden en te volgen
- You ideally need a single "home" URL that you can promote and point people to in relation to your project. You don't need to splash out on a fancy template or even a domain name, but your project needs a focal point.
+ U hebt idealiter een enkele "home"-URL nodig die u kunt promoten en waarnaar u mensen kunt verwijzen met betrekking tot uw project. U hoeft niet te spetteren op een mooie sjabloon of zelfs een domeinnaam, maar uw project heeft een centraal punt nodig.
+
+ _You ideally need a single "home" URL that you can promote and point people to in relation to your project. You don't need to splash out on a fancy template or even a domain name, but your project needs a focal point._
-— Peter Cooper & Robert Nyman, ["How to Spread the Word About Your Code"](https://hacks.mozilla.org/2013/05/how-to-spread-the-word-about-your-code/)
+— Peter Cooper & Robert Nyman, ["Hoe u het woord over uw code kunt verspreiden"](https://hacks.mozilla.org/2013/05/how-to-spread-the-word-about-your-code/)
-Help people find and remember your project by pointing them to a single namespace.
+Help mensen uw project te vinden en te onthouden door ze naar een enkele naamruimte te verwijzen.
-**Have a clear handle to promote your work.** A Twitter handle, GitHub URL, or IRC channel is an easy way to point people to your project. These outlets also give your project's growing community a place to convene.
+**Zorg voor een duidelijk handvat om uw werk te promoten.** Een Twitter-account, GitHub-URL of IRC-kanaal is een gemakkelijke manier om mensen naar uw project te verwijzen. Deze verkooppunten geven ook de groeiende gemeenschap van uw project een plek om samen te komen.
-If you don't wish to set up outlets for your project yet, promote your own Twitter or GitHub handle in everything you do. Promoting your Twitter or GitHub handle will let people know how to contact you or follow your work. If you speak at a meetup or event, make sure that your contact information is included in your bio or slides.
+Als u nog geen verkooppunten voor uw project wilt opzetten, promoot dan uw eigen Twitter- of GitHub-account bij alles wat u doet. Door je Twitter- of GitHub-account te promoten, kunnen mensen weten hoe ze contact met je kunnen opnemen of je werk kunnen volgen. Als je op een bijeenkomst of evenement spreekt, zorg er dan voor dat je contactgegevens in je biografie of dia's staan.
- A mistake I made in those early days (...) was not starting a Twitter account for the project. Twitter's a great way to keep people up to date about a project as well as constantly expose people to the project.
+ Een fout die ik in die vroege dagen maakte (...) was dat ik geen Twitter-account voor het project startte. Twitter is een geweldige manier om mensen op de hoogte te houden van een project en om mensen constant aan het project bloot te stellen.
+
+ _A mistake I made in those early days (...) was not starting a Twitter account for the project. Twitter's a great way to keep people up to date about a project as well as constantly expose people to the project._
-— @nathanmarz, ["History of Apache Storm and Lessons Learned"](http://nathanmarz.com/blog/history-of-apache-storm-and-lessons-learned.html)
+— @nathanmarz, ["Geschiedenis van Apache Storm en geleerde lessen"](http://nathanmarz.com/blog/history-of-apache-storm-and-lessons-learned.html)
-**Consider creating a website for your project.** A website makes your project friendlier and easier to navigate, especially when it's paired with clear documentation and tutorials. Having a website also suggests that your project is active which will make your audience feel more comfortable using it. Provide examples to give people ideas for how to use your project.
+**Overweeg om een website voor uw project te maken.** Een website maakt uw project vriendelijker en gemakkelijker te navigeren, vooral als deze is gekoppeld aan duidelijke documentatie en tutorials. Het hebben van een website suggereert ook dat uw project actief is, waardoor uw publiek zich er prettiger bij voelt. Geef voorbeelden om mensen ideeën te geven voor het gebruik van uw project.
-[@adrianholovaty](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7531689), co-creator of Django, said that a website was _"by far the best thing we did with Django in the early days"_.
+[@adrianholovaty](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7531689), mede-maker van Django, zei dat een website _"verreweg het beste was wat we vroeger met Django deden"_.
-If your project is hosted on GitHub, you can use [GitHub Pages](https://pages.github.com/) to easily make a website. [Yeoman](http://yeoman.io/), [Vagrant](https://www.vagrantup.com/), and [Middleman](https://middlemanapp.com/) are [a few examples](https://github.com/showcases/github-pages-examples) of excellent, comprehensive websites.
+Als uw project op GitHub wordt gehost, kunt u [GitHub Pages](https://pages.github.com/) gebruiken om eenvoudig een website te maken. [Yeoman](http://yeoman.io/), [Vagrant](https://www.vagrantup.com/), en [Middleman](https://middlemanapp.com/) zijn [een paar voorbeelden](https://github.com/showcases/github-pages-examples) van uitstekende, uitgebreide websites.
![Vagrant homepage](/assets/images/finding-users/vagrant_homepage.png)
-Now that you have a message for your project, and an easy way for people to find your project, let's get out there and talk to your audience!
+Nu u een bericht voor uw project heeft en mensen uw project gemakkelijk kunnen vinden, gaan we naar buiten en praten met uw publiek!
-## Go where your project's audience is (online)
+## Ga waar het publiek van uw project is (online)
-Online outreach is a great way to share and spread the word quickly. Using online channels, you have the potential to reach a very wide audience.
+Online bereik is een geweldige manier om snel te delen en het woord te verspreiden. Door online kanalen te gebruiken, heb je de potentie om een zeer breed publiek te bereiken.
-Take advantage of existing online communities and platforms to reach your audience. If your open source project is a software project, you can probably find your audience on [Stack Overflow](https://stackoverflow.com/), [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com), [Hacker News](https://news.ycombinator.com/), or [Quora](https://www.quora.com/). Find the channels where you think people will most benefit from or be excited about your work.
+Profiteer van bestaande online communities en platforms om uw publiek te bereiken. Als uw open source-project een softwareproject is, kunt u uw publiek waarschijnlijk vinden op [Stack Overflow](https://stackoverflow.com/), [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com), [Hacker News](https://news.ycombinator.com/), of [Quora](https://www.quora.com/). Vind de kanalen waarvan u denkt dat mensen er het meeste baat bij hebben of enthousiast zijn over uw werk.
- Each program has very specific functions that only a fraction of users will find useful. Don't spam as many people as possible. Instead, target your efforts to communities that will benefit from knowing about your project.
+ Elk programma heeft zeer specifieke functies die slechts een fractie van de gebruikers nuttig zullen vinden. Spam niet zoveel mogelijk mensen. Richt uw inspanningen in plaats daarvan op gemeenschappen die baat hebben bij kennis van uw project.
+
+ _Each program has very specific functions that only a fraction of users will find useful. Don't spam as many people as possible. Instead, target your efforts to communities that will benefit from knowing about your project._
-— @pazdera, ["Marketing for open source projects"](https://radek.io/2015/09/28/marketing-for-open-source-projects-3/)
+— @pazdera, ["Marketing voor open source-projecten"](https://radek.io/2015/09/28/marketing-for-open-source-projects-3/)
-See if you can find ways to share your project in relevant ways:
+Kijk of u manieren kunt vinden om uw project op relevante manieren te delen:
-* **Get to know relevant open source projects and communities.** Sometimes, you don't have to directly promote your project. If your project is perfect for data scientists who use Python, get to know the Python data science community. As people get to know you, natural opportunities will arise to talk about and share your work.
-* **Find people experiencing the problem that your project solves.** Search through related forums for people who fall into your project's target audience. Answer their question and find a tactful way, when appropriate, to suggest your project as a solution.
-* **Ask for feedback.** Introduce yourself and your work to an audience that would find it relevant and interesting. Be specific about who you think would benefit from your project. Try to finish the sentence: _"I think my project would really help X, who are trying to do Y_". Listen and respond to others' feedback, rather than simply promoting your work.
+* **Maak kennis met relevante open source-projecten en communities.** Soms hoeft u uw project niet rechtstreeks te promoten. Als je project perfect is voor datawetenschappers die Python gebruiken, maak dan kennis met de data science-community van Python. Als mensen je leren kennen, ontstaan er natuurlijke mogelijkheden om over je werk te praten en het te delen.
+* **Vind mensen die het probleem ondervinden dat uw project oplost.** Doorzoek gerelateerde forums voor mensen die tot de doelgroep van uw project behoren. Beantwoord hun vraag en zoek, indien nodig, een tactvolle manier om uw project als oplossing voor te stellen.
+* **Vraag om feedback.** Stel uzelf en uw werk voor aan een publiek dat het relevant en interessant zou vinden. Wees specifiek over wie u denkt dat baat zou hebben bij uw project. Probeer de zin af te maken: _"Ik denk dat mijn project X echt zou helpen, die Y proberen te doen_". Luister en reageer op de feedback van anderen, in plaats van simpelweg uw werk te promoten.
-Generally speaking, focus on helping others before asking for things in return. Because anyone can easily promote a project online, there will be a lot of noise. To stand out from the crowd, give people context for who you are and not just what you want.
+Richt u in het algemeen op het helpen van anderen voordat u in ruil daarvoor dingen vraagt. Omdat iedereen gemakkelijk een project online kan promoten, zal er veel concurrentie zijn. Om u te onderscheiden van de massa, geeft u mensen context voor wie u bent en niet alleen wat u wilt.
-If nobody pays attention or responds to your initial outreach, don't get discouraged! Most project launches are an iterative process that can take months or years. If you don't get a response the first time, try a different tactic, or look for ways to add value to others' work first. Promoting and launching your project takes time and dedication.
+Als niemand op uw eerste berichten let of reageert, raak dan niet ontmoedigd! De meeste projectlanceringen zijn een iteratief proces dat maanden of jaren kan duren. Als je de eerste keer geen reactie krijgt, probeer dan een andere tactiek of zoek eerst naar manieren om waarde toe te voegen aan het werk van anderen. Het promoten en lanceren van uw project kost tijd en toewijding.
-## Go where your project's audience is (offline)
+## Ga waar het publiek van uw project is (offline)
![Public speaking](/assets/images/finding-users/public_speaking.jpg)
-Offline events are a popular way to promote new projects to audiences. They're a great way to reach an engaged audience and build deeper human connections, especially if you are interested in reaching developers.
+Offline evenementen zijn een populaire manier om nieuwe projecten onder het publiek te promoten. Ze zijn een geweldige manier om een betrokken publiek te bereiken en diepere menselijke connecties op te bouwen, vooral als je ontwikkelaars wilt bereiken.
-If you're [new to public speaking](https://speaking.io/), start by finding a local meetup that's related to the language or ecosystem of your project.
+Als je [nieuw bent bij spreken in het openbaar](https://speaking.io/), begin dan met het vinden van een lokale bijeenkomst die gerelateerd is aan de taal of het ecosysteem van je project.
- I was pretty nervous about going to PyCon. I was giving a talk, I was only going to know a couple of people there, I was going for an entire week. (...) I shouldn't have worried, though. PyCon was phenomenally awesome! (...) Everyone was incredibly friendly and outgoing, so much that I rarely found time not to talk to people!
+ Ik was behoorlijk zenuwachtig om naar PyCon te gaan. Ik hield een lezing, ik zou daar maar een paar mensen leren kennen, ik ging een hele week. (...) Ik had me echter geen zorgen moeten maken. PyCon was fenomenaal geweldig! (...) Iedereen was ongelooflijk vriendelijk en extravert, zo erg dat ik zelden tijd vond om niet met mensen te praten!
+
+ _I was pretty nervous about going to PyCon. I was giving a talk, I was only going to know a couple of people there, I was going for an entire week. (...) I shouldn't have worried, though. PyCon was phenomenally awesome! (...) Everyone was incredibly friendly and outgoing, so much that I rarely found time not to talk to people!_
-— @jhamrick, ["How I learned to Stop Worrying and Love PyCon"](http://www.jesshamrick.com/2014/04/18/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-pycon/)
+— @jhamrick, ["Hoe ik heb geleerd om te stoppen met piekeren en van PyCon te houden"](http://www.jesshamrick.com/2014/04/18/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-pycon/)
-If you've never spoken at an event before, it's perfectly normal to feel nervous! Remember that your audience is there because they genuinely want to hear about your work.
+Als je nog nooit op een evenement hebt gesproken, is het volkomen normaal om nerveus te zijn! Onthoud dat uw publiek er is omdat ze oprecht over uw werk willen horen.
-As you write your talk, focus on what your audience will find interesting and get value out of. Keep your language friendly and approachable. Smile, breathe, and have fun.
+Concentreer u tijdens het schrijven van uw lezing op wat uw publiek interessant zal vinden en waar ze waarde uit kunnen halen. Houd uw taal vriendelijk en benaderbaar. Glimlach, adem en heb plezier.
- When you start writing your talk, no matter what your topic is, it can help if you see your talk as a story that you tell people.
+ Wanneer u begint met het schrijven van uw lezing, ongeacht wat uw onderwerp is, kan het helpen als u uw lezing ziet als een verhaal dat u aan mensen vertelt.
+
+ _When you start writing your talk, no matter what your topic is, it can help if you see your talk as a story that you tell people._
-— Lena Reinhard, ["How to Prepare and Write a Tech Conference Talk"](http://wunder.schoenaberselten.com/2016/02/16/how-to-prepare-and-write-a-tech-conference-talk/)
+— Lena Reinhard, ["Hoe u een Tech Conferentie Lezing voorbereidt en schrijft"](http://wunder.schoenaberselten.com/2016/02/16/how-to-prepare-and-write-a-tech-conference-talk/)
-When you feel ready, consider speaking at a conference to promote your project. Conferences can help you reach more people, sometimes from all over the world.
+Als u zich er klaar voor voelt, overweeg dan om op een conferentie te spreken om uw project te promoten. Conferenties kunnen u helpen meer mensen te bereiken, soms van over de hele wereld.
-Look for conferences that are specific to your language or ecosystem. Before you submit your talk, research the conference to tailor your talk for attendees and increase your chances of being accepted to speak at the conference. You can often get a sense of your audience by looking at a conference's speakers.
+Zoek naar conferenties die specifiek zijn voor uw taal of ecosysteem. Voordat u uw toespraak indient, moet u de conferentie onderzoeken om uw lezing af te stemmen op de aanwezigen en uw kansen te vergroten om geaccepteerd te worden op de conferentie. U kunt vaak een idee krijgen van uw publiek door naar de sprekers van een conferentie te kijken.
- I wrote very nicely to the JSConf people and begged them to give me a slot where I could present it at JSConf EU. (...) I was extremely scared, presenting this thing that I had been working on for six months. (...) The whole time I was just thinking, oh my God. What am I doing here?
+ Ik schreef heel vriendelijk naar de JSConf-mensen en smeekte hen om me een slot te geven waar ik het op JSConf EU kon presenteren. (...) Ik was enorm bang toen ik dit ding presenteerde waar ik al een half jaar aan werkte. (...) De hele tijd dacht ik alleen maar: oh mijn God. Wat doe ik hier?
+
+ _I wrote very nicely to the JSConf people and begged them to give me a slot where I could present it at JSConf EU. (...) I was extremely scared, presenting this thing that I had been working on for six months. (...) The whole time I was just thinking, oh my God. What am I doing here?_
-— @ry, ["History of Node.js" (video)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAc0vQCC6UQ&t=24m57s)
+— @ry, ["Historie van Node.js" (video)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAc0vQCC6UQ&t=24m57s)
-## Build a reputation
+## Bouw een reputatie op
-In addition to the strategies outlined above, the best way to invite people to share and contribute to your project is to share and contribute to their projects.
+Naast de hierboven beschreven strategieën, is de beste manier om mensen uit te nodigen om te delen en bij te dragen aan uw project, het delen van en bijdragen aan hun projecten.
-Helping newcomers, sharing resources, and making thoughtful contributions to others' projects will help you build a positive reputation. Being an active member in the open source community will help people have context for your work and be more likely to pay attention to and share your project. Developing relationships with other open source projects can even lead to official partnerships.
+Door nieuwkomers te helpen, middelen te delen en doordachte bijdragen te leveren aan de projecten van anderen, kunt u een positieve reputatie opbouwen. Door een actief lid te zijn van de open source-gemeenschap, zullen mensen context voor uw werk hebben en zullen ze eerder aandacht besteden aan en uw project delen. Het ontwikkelen van relaties met andere open source-projecten kan zelfs leiden tot officiële partnerschappen.
- The only reason urllib3 is the most popular third-party Python library today is because it's part of requests.
+ De enige reden waarom urllib3 tegenwoordig de populairste Python-bibliotheek van derden is, is omdat het deel uitmaakt van verzoeken.
+
+ _The only reason urllib3 is the most popular third-party Python library today is because it's part of requests._
-— @shazow, ["How to make your open source project thrive"](https://about.sourcegraph.com/blog/how-to-make-your-open-source-project-thrive-with-andrey-petrov/)
+— @shazow, ["Hoe u uw open source-project kunt laten floreren"](https://about.sourcegraph.com/blog/how-to-make-your-open-source-project-thrive-with-andrey-petrov/)
-It's never too early, or too late, to start building your reputation. Even if you've launched your own project already, continue to look for ways to help others.
+Het is nooit te vroeg of te laat om uw reputatie op te bouwen. Zelfs als u uw eigen project al hebt gelanceerd, blijf zoeken naar manieren om anderen te helpen.
-There is no overnight solution to building an audience. Gaining the trust and respect of others takes time, and building your reputation never ends.
+Er is geen oplossing van de ene op de andere dag om een publiek op te bouwen. Het vertrouwen en respect van anderen winnen kost tijd, en het opbouwen van uw reputatie houdt nooit op.
- PhantomJS was released for the first time in the beginning of 2011. (...) I spread the word in the usual ways: I tweeted about it, I wrote blog posts on things you could do with it, I mentioned it during various discussions in meetups. When it became more well known in 2014, I started giving presentations about it.
+ PhantomJS werd begin 2011 voor het eerst uitgebracht. (...) Ik verspreidde het woord op de gebruikelijke manieren: ik twitterde erover, ik schreef blogposts over dingen die je ermee kon doen, ik noemde het tijdens verschillende discussies in meetups. Toen het in 2014 bekender werd, ben ik er presentaties over gaan geven.
+
+ _PhantomJS was released for the first time in the beginning of 2011. (...) I spread the word in the usual ways: I tweeted about it, I wrote blog posts on things you could do with it, I mentioned it during various discussions in meetups. When it became more well known in 2014, I started giving presentations about it._
-— @ariya, ["Maintainer Stories"](https://github.com/open-source/stories/ariya)
+— @ariya, ["Open source-beheerder verhalen"](https://github.com/open-source/stories/ariya)
## Keep at it!
-It may take a long time before people notice your open source project. That's okay! Some of the most popular projects today took years to reach high levels of activity. Focus on building relationships instead of hoping that your project will spontaneously gain popularity. Be patient, and keep sharing your work with those who appreciate it.
+Het kan lang duren voordat mensen uw open source-project opmerken. Dat is goed! Enkele van de meest populaire projecten van vandaag hebben jaren geduurd om een hoog activiteitsniveau te bereiken. Concentreer u op het opbouwen van relaties in plaats van te hopen dat uw project spontaan populair zal worden. Wees geduldig en blijf uw werk delen met degenen die het op prijs stellen.
From 38e663fec4bcd0be3fa44bea71571deeb99a831c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley de Groot
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:31:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 068/749] Article 'Getting Paid'
---
_articles/nl/getting-paid.md | 187 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/nl/getting-paid.md b/_articles/nl/getting-paid.md
index 4e7285c778f..6de7d1d2ae5 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/getting-paid.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/getting-paid.md
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
---
lang: nl
-title: Getting Paid for Open Source Work
-description: Sustain your work in open source by getting financial support for your time or your project.
+title: Betaald worden voor open source-werk
+description: Ondersteun uw werk in open source door financiële steun te krijgen voor uw tijd of uw project.
class: getting-paid
toc:
- why-some-people-seek-financial-support: "Why some people seek financial support"
- funding-your-own-time: "Funding your own time"
- finding-funding-for-your-project: "Finding funding for your project"
- building-a-case-for-financial-support: "Building a case for financial support"
+ why-some-people-seek-financial-support: "Waarom sommige mensen financiële steun zoeken"
+ funding-your-own-time: "Je eigen tijd financieren"
+ finding-funding-for-your-project: "Financiering vinden voor uw project"
+ building-a-case-for-financial-support: "Het bouwen van een case voor financiële steun"
order: 7
image: /assets/images/cards/getting-paid.png
related:
@@ -15,177 +15,194 @@ related:
- leadership
---
-## Why some people seek financial support
+## Waarom sommige mensen financiële steun zoeken
-Much of open source work is volunteered. For example, someone might come across a bug in a project they use and submit a quick fix, or they might enjoy tinkering with an open source project in their spare time.
+Veel van het open source-werk wordt op vrijwillige basis aangeboden. Iemand kan bijvoorbeeld een bug tegenkomen in een project dat ze gebruiken en een snelle oplossing indienen, of ze kunnen in hun vrije tijd graag aan een open source-project sleutelen.
-I was looking for a "hobby" programming project that would keep me occupied during the week around Christmas. (...) I had a home computer, and not much else on my hands. I decided to write an interpreter for the new scripting language I had been thinking about lately. (...) I chose Python as a working title.
+ Ik was op zoek naar een "hobby" programmeerproject dat me doordeweeks rond Kerstmis bezig zou houden. (...) Ik had een homecomputer, en verder niet veel. Ik besloot een tolk te schrijven voor de nieuwe scripttaal waar ik de laatste tijd aan had gedacht. (...) Ik koos Python als werktitel.
+
+ _I was looking for a "hobby" programming project that would keep me occupied during the week around Christmas. (...) I had a home computer, and not much else on my hands. I decided to write an interpreter for the new scripting language I had been thinking about lately. (...) I chose Python as a working title._
+
-— @gvanrossum, ["Programming Python"](https://www.python.org/doc/essays/foreword/)
+— @gvanrossum, ["Python programmeren"](https://www.python.org/doc/essays/foreword/)
-There are many reasons why a person would not want to be paid for their open source work.
+Er zijn veel redenen waarom iemand niet zou willen worden betaald voor zijn open source-werk.
-* **They may already have a full-time job that they love,** which enables them to contribute to open source in their spare time.
-* **They enjoy thinking of open source as a hobby** or creative escape and don't want to feel financially obligated to work on their projects.
-* **They get other benefits from contributing to open source,** such as building their reputation or portfolio, learning a new skill, or feeling closer to a community.
+* **Ze hebben misschien al een fulltime baan waar ze van houden,** waardoor ze in hun vrije tijd kunnen bijdragen aan open source.
+* **Ze vinden open source graag een hobby** of een creatieve ontsnapping en willen zich niet financieel verplicht voelen om aan hun projecten te werken.
+* **Ze profiteren van andere voordelen door bij te dragen aan open source,** zoals het opbouwen van hun reputatie of portfolio, het leren van een nieuwe vaardigheid of het gevoel dichter bij een gemeenschap te zijn.
- Financial donations do add a feeling of responsibility, for some. (...) It's important for us, in the globally connected, fast-paced world we live in, to be able to say "not now, I feel like doing something completely different".
+ Financiële donaties voegen voor sommigen een gevoel van verantwoordelijkheid toe. (...) Het is belangrijk voor ons, in de wereldwijd verbonden, snelle wereld waarin we leven, om te kunnen zeggen "niet nu, ik heb zin om iets heel anders te doen".
+
+ _Financial donations do add a feeling of responsibility, for some. (...) It's important for us, in the globally connected, fast-paced world we live in, to be able to say "not now, I feel like doing something completely different"._
+
-— @alloy, ["Why We Don't Accept Donations"](https://blog.cocoapods.org/Why-we-dont-accept-donations/)
+— @alloy, ["Waarom we geen donaties accepteren"](https://blog.cocoapods.org/Why-we-dont-accept-donations/)
-For others, especially when contributions are ongoing or require significant time, getting paid to contribute to open source is the only way they can participate, either because the project requires it, or for personal reasons.
+Voor anderen, vooral wanneer bijdragen doorlopend zijn of veel tijd vergen, is betaald krijgen om bij te dragen aan open source de enige manier waarop ze kunnen deelnemen, hetzij omdat het project dit vereist, hetzij om persoonlijke redenen.
-Maintaining popular projects can be a significant responsibility, taking up 10 or 20 hours per week instead of a few hours per month.
+Het onderhouden van populaire projecten kan een aanzienlijke verantwoordelijkheid zijn, die 10 of 20 uur per week in beslag neemt in plaats van een paar uur per maand.
- Ask any open source project maintainer, and they will tell you about the reality of the amount of work that goes into managing a project. You have clients. You are fixing issues for them. You are creating new features. This becomes a real demand on your time.
+ Vraag het aan een willekeurige open source projectbeheerder, en zij zullen u vertellen over de realiteit van de hoeveelheid werk die nodig is om een project te beheren. Je hebt klanten. U lost problemen voor hen op. U creëert nieuwe functies. Dit wordt een echte tijdrovende bezigheid.
+
+ _Ask any open source project maintainer, and they will tell you about the reality of the amount of work that goes into managing a project. You have clients. You are fixing issues for them. You are creating new features. This becomes a real demand on your time._
+
-— @ashedryden, ["The Ethics of Unpaid Labor and the OSS Community"](https://www.ashedryden.com/blog/the-ethics-of-unpaid-labor-and-the-oss-community)
+— @ashedryden, ["De ethiek van onbetaalde arbeid en de OSS-gemeenschap"](https://www.ashedryden.com/blog/the-ethics-of-unpaid-labor-and-the-oss-community)
-Paid work also enables people from different walks of life to make meaningful contributions. Some people cannot afford to spend unpaid time on open source projects, based on their current financial position, debt, or family or other caretaking obligations. That means the world never sees contributions from talented people who can't afford to volunteer their time. This has ethical implications, as @ashedryden [has described](https://www.ashedryden.com/blog/the-ethics-of-unpaid-labor-and-the-oss-community), since work that is done is biased in favor of those who already have advantages in life, who then gain additional advantages based on their volunteer contributions, while others who are not able to volunteer then don't get later opportunities, which reinforces the current lack of diversity in the open source community.
+Betaald werk stelt mensen uit verschillende rangen en standen ook in staat om een zinvolle bijdrage te leveren. Sommige mensen kunnen het zich niet veroorloven om onbetaalde tijd aan open source-projecten te besteden, op basis van hun huidige financiële positie, schulden, familie- of andere zorgverplichtingen. Dat betekent dat de wereld nooit bijdragen ziet van getalenteerde mensen die het zich niet kunnen veroorloven om vrijwilligerswerk te doen. Dit heeft ethische implicaties, zoals @ashedryden [heeft beschreven](https://www.ashedryden.com/blog/the-ethics-of-unpaid-labor-and-the-oss-community), aangezien werk dat wordt gedaan, bevooroordeeld ten gunste van degenen die al voordelen in het leven hebben, die vervolgens extra voordelen krijgen op basis van hun vrijwilligersbijdragen, terwijl anderen die niet in staat zijn om vrijwilligerswerk te doen, later geen kansen krijgen, wat het huidige gebrek aan diversiteit in de open source versterkt gemeenschap.
- OSS yields massive benefits to the technology industry, which, in turn, means benefits to all industries. (...) However, if the only people who can focus on it are the lucky and the obsessed, then there's a huge untapped potential.
+ OSS levert enorme voordelen op voor de technologische industrie, wat op zijn beurt voordelen betekent voor alle industrieën. (...) Als de enige mensen die zich erop kunnen concentreren de gelukkigen en geobsedeerd zijn, dan is er een enorm onbenut potentieel.
+
+ _OSS yields massive benefits to the technology industry, which, in turn, means benefits to all industries. (...) However, if the only people who can focus on it are the lucky and the obsessed, then there's a huge untapped potential._
-— @isaacs, ["Money and Open Source"](https://medium.com/open-source-life/money-and-open-source-d44a1953749c)
+— @isaacs, ["Geld en Open Source"](https://medium.com/open-source-life/money-and-open-source-d44a1953749c)
-If you're looking for financial support, there are two paths to consider. You can fund your own time as a contributor, or you can find organizational funding for the project.
+Als u op zoek bent naar financiële ondersteuning, zijn er twee manieren om te overwegen. U kunt uw eigen tijd als donateur financieren, of u kunt organisatorische financiering voor het project vinden.
-## Funding your own time
+## Je eigen tijd financieren
-Today, many people get paid to work part- or full-time on open source. The most common way to get paid for your time is to talk to your employer.
+Tegenwoordig worden veel mensen betaald om part- of fulltime aan open source te werken. De meest gebruikelijke manier om voor uw tijd betaald te worden, is door met uw werkgever te praten.
-It's easier to make a case for open source work if your employer actually uses the project, but get creative with your pitch. Maybe your employer doesn't use the project, but they use Python, and maintaining a popular Python project help attract new Python developers. Maybe it makes your employer look more developer-friendly in general.
+Het is gemakkelijker om een pleidooi te houden voor open source-werk als je werkgever het project ook daadwerkelijk gebruikt, maar wees creatief met je pitch. Misschien gebruikt je werkgever het project niet, maar ze gebruiken Python, en het onderhouden van een populair Python-project helpt nieuwe Python-ontwikkelaars aan te trekken. Misschien zorgt het ervoor dat uw werkgever er in het algemeen ontwikkelaarvriendelijker uitziet.
- Like many in open source, I was struggling with the burden of maintaining a project. When I first started doing open source, I used to just stay late to work on it or right when I got home. (...) I was able to discuss with my boss the issues I was facing and we came up with ideas on how we could incorporate open source tasks given our own use of Babel.
+ Zoals velen in open source, worstelde ik met de last om een project te onderhouden. Toen ik voor het eerst met open source begon, bleef ik gewoon te laat om eraan te werken of toen ik thuiskwam. (...) Ik was in staat om met mijn baas de problemen te bespreken waarmee ik werd geconfronteerd en we kwamen met ideeën over hoe we open source-taken konden integreren met ons eigen gebruik van Babel.
+
+ _Like many in open source, I was struggling with the burden of maintaining a project. When I first started doing open source, I used to just stay late to work on it or right when I got home. (...) I was able to discuss with my boss the issues I was facing and we came up with ideas on how we could incorporate open source tasks given our own use of Babel._
-— @hzoo, ["Maintainer Stories"](https://github.com/open-source/stories/hzoo)
+— @hzoo, ["Open source-onderhouder verhalen"](https://github.com/open-source/stories/hzoo)
-If you don't have an existing open source project you'd like to work on, but would rather that your current work output is open sourced, make a case for your employer to open source some of their internal software.
+Als je geen bestaand open source-project hebt waaraan je zou willen werken, maar liever hebt dat je huidige werkoutput open source is, pleit er dan voor dat je werkgever een deel van hun interne software open source maakt.
-Many companies are developing open source programs to build their brand and recruit quality talent.
+Veel bedrijven ontwikkelen open source-programma's om hun merk op te bouwen en talent van hoge kwaliteit te werven.
-@hueniverse, for example, found that there were financial reasons to justify [Walmart's investment in open source](https://www.infoworld.com/article/2608897/open-source-software/walmart-s-investment-in-open-source-isn-t-cheap.html). And @jamesgpearce found that Facebook's open source program [made a difference](https://opensource.com/business/14/10/head-of-open-source-facebook-oscon) in recruiting:
+@hueniverse ontdekte bijvoorbeeld dat er financiële redenen waren om [Walmart's investering in open source](https://www.infoworld.com/article/2608897/open-source-software/walmart-s-investment-in-open-source-isn-t-cheap.html). En @jamesgpearce ontdekte dat het open source-programma van Facebook [een verschil maakte](https://opensource.com/business/14/10/head-of-open-source-facebook-oscon) bij het werven van:
-> It is closely aligned with our hacker culture, and how our organization was perceived. We asked our employees, "Were you aware of the open source software program at Facebook?". Two-thirds said "Yes". One-half said that the program positively contributed to their decision to work for us. These are not marginal numbers, and I hope, a trend that continues.
+> Het sluit nauw aan bij onze hackercultuur en hoe onze organisatie werd gezien. We vroegen onze medewerkers: "Was u op de hoogte van het open source softwareprogramma op Facebook?". Twee derde zei "Ja". De helft zei dat het programma een positieve bijdrage leverde aan hun beslissing om voor ons te werken. Dit zijn geen marginale cijfers, en naar ik hoop, een trend die zich voortzet.
-If your company goes down this route, it's important to keep the boundaries between community and corporate activity clear. Ultimately, open source sustains itself through contributions from people all over the world, and that's bigger than any one company or location.
+Als uw bedrijf deze weg inslaat, is het belangrijk om de grenzen tussen gemeenschap en bedrijfsactiviteiten duidelijk te houden. Uiteindelijk houdt open source zichzelf in stand door bijdragen van mensen over de hele wereld, en dat is groter dan welk bedrijf of locatie dan ook.
- Getting paid to work on open source is a rare and wonderful opportunity, but you should not have to give up your passion in the process. Your passion should be why companies want to pay you.
+ Betaald worden om aan open source te werken is een zeldzame en geweldige kans, maar je zou je passie in het proces niet moeten opgeven. Uw passie zou moeten zijn waarom bedrijven u willen betalen.
+
+ _Getting paid to work on open source is a rare and wonderful opportunity, but you should not have to give up your passion in the process. Your passion should be why companies want to pay you._
-— @jessfraz, ["Blurred Lines"](https://blog.jessfraz.com/post/blurred-lines/)
+— @jessfraz, ["Wazige lijnen"](https://blog.jessfraz.com/post/blurred-lines/)
-If you can't convince your current employer to prioritize open source work, consider finding a new employer that encourages employee contributions to open source. Look for companies that make their dedication to open source work explicit. For example:
+Als u uw huidige werkgever niet kunt overtuigen om prioriteit te geven aan open source-werk, overweeg dan om een nieuwe werkgever te zoeken die werknemersbijdragen aan open source aanmoedigt. Zoek naar bedrijven die hun toewijding aan open source-werk expliciet maken. Bijvoorbeeld:
-* Some companies, like [Netflix](https://netflix.github.io/) or [PayPal](https://paypal.github.io/), have websites that highlight their involvement in open source
-* [Zalando](https://opensource.zalando.com) published its [open source contribution policy](https://opensource.zalando.com/docs/using/contributing/) for employees
+* Sommige bedrijven, zoals [Netflix](https://netflix.github.io/) of [PayPal](https://paypal.github.io/), hebben websites die hun betrokkenheid bij open source benadrukken
+* [Zalando](https://opensource.zalando.com) publiceerde zijn [open source bijdragebeleid](https://opensource.zalando.com/docs/using/contributing/) voor werknemers
-Projects that originated at a large company, such as [Go](https://github.com/golang) or [React](https://github.com/facebook/react), will also likely employ people to work on open source.
+Projecten die zijn ontstaan bij een groot bedrijf, zoals [Go](https://github.com/golang) of [React](https://github.com/facebook/react), zullen waarschijnlijk ook mensen in dienst hebben om aan te werken open source.
-Depending on your personal circumstances, you can try raising money independently to fund your open source work. For example:
+Afhankelijk van uw persoonlijke omstandigheden kunt u proberen om zelfstandig geld in te zamelen om uw open source-werk te financieren. Bijvoorbeeld:
-* @gaearon funded his work on [Redux](https://github.com/reactjs/redux) through a [Patreon crowdfunding campaign](https://redux.js.org/)
-* @andrewgodwin funded work on Django schema migrations [through a Kickstarter campaign](https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/andrewgodwin/schema-migrations-for-django)
+* @gaearon financierde zijn werk op [Redux](https://github.com/reactjs/redux) via een [Patreon crowdfunding-campagne](https://redux.js.org/)
+* @andrewgodwin gefinancierd werk aan Django-schemamigraties [via een Kickstarter-campagne](https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/andrewgodwin/schema-migrations-for-django)
-Finally, sometimes open source projects put bounties on issues that you might consider helping with.
+Ten slotte geven open source-projecten soms premies voor problemen waarmee u zou kunnen helpen.
-* @ConnorChristie was able to get paid for [helping](https://web.archive.org/web/20181030123412/https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?strip=1&q=cache:https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FMARKETProtocol%2FMARKET.js%2Fissues%2F14) @MARKETProtocol work on their javascript library [through a bounty on gitcoin](https://gitcoin.co/).
-* @mamiM did Japanese translations for @MetaMask after the [issue was funded on Bounties Network](https://explorer.bounties.network/bounty/134).
+* @ConnorChristie kon betaald worden voor [helpen](https://web.archive.org/web/20181030123412/https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?strip=1&q=cache:https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FMARKETProtocol%2FMARKET.js%2Fissues%2F14) @MARKETProtocol werken aan hun javascript-bibliotheek [via een premie op gitcoin](https://gitcoin.co/).
+* @mamiM deed Japanse vertalingen voor @MetaMask nadat de [kwestie werd gefinancierd op Bounties Network](https://explorer.bounties.network/bounty/134).
-## Finding funding for your project
+## Financiering vinden voor uw project
-Beyond arrangements for individual contributors, sometimes projects raise money from companies, individuals, or others to fund ongoing work.
+Naast regelingen voor individuele bijdragers, halen projecten soms geld op bij bedrijven, individuen of anderen om lopende werkzaamheden te financieren.
-Organizational funding might go towards paying current contributors, covering the costs of running the project (such as hosting fees), or investing into new features or ideas.
+Organisatorische financiering kan gaan naar het betalen van huidige bijdragers, het dekken van de kosten van het uitvoeren van het project (zoals hostingvergoedingen) of het investeren in nieuwe functies of ideeën.
-As open source's popularity increases, finding funding for projects is still experimental, but there are a few common options available.
+Naarmate de populariteit van open source toeneemt, is het vinden van financiering voor projecten nog experimenteel, maar er zijn een paar veelvoorkomende opties beschikbaar.
-### Raise money for your work through crowdfunding campaigns or sponsorships
+### Zamel geld in voor je werk door middel van crowdfundingcampagnes of sponsoring
-Finding sponsorships works well if you have a strong audience or reputation already, or your project is very popular.
-A few examples of sponsored projects include:
+Het vinden van sponsoring werkt goed als je al een sterk publiek of een sterke reputatie hebt, of als je project erg populair is.
+Enkele voorbeelden van gesponsorde projecten zijn:
-* **[webpack](https://github.com/webpack)** raises money from companies and individuals [through OpenCollective](https://opencollective.com/webpack)
-* **[Vue](https://github.com/vuejs/vue)** is [funded through Patreon](https://github.com/open-source/stories/yyx990803)
-* **[Ruby Together](https://rubytogether.org/),** a nonprofit organization that pays for work on [bundler](https://github.com/bundler/bundler), [RubyGems](https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems), and other Ruby infrastructure projects
+* **[webpack](https://github.com/webpack)** zamelt geld in bij bedrijven en particulieren [via OpenCollective](https://opencollective.com/webpack)
+* **[Vue](https://github.com/vuejs/vue)** wordt [gefinancierd via Patreon](https://github.com/open-source/stories/yyx990803)
+* **[Ruby Together](https://rubytogether.org/),** een non-profitorganisatie die betaalt voor werk aan [bundler](https://github.com/bundler/bundler), [RubyGems](https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems), en andere Ruby-infrastructuurprojecten
-### Create a revenue stream
+### Creëer een inkomstenstroom
-Depending on your project, you may be able to charge for commercial support, hosted options, or additional features. A few examples include:
+Afhankelijk van uw project kunt u mogelijk kosten in rekening brengen voor commerciële ondersteuning, gehoste opties of extra functies. Enkele voorbeelden zijn:
-* **[Sidekiq](https://github.com/mperham/sidekiq)** offers paid versions for additional support
-* **[Travis CI](https://github.com/travis-ci)** offers paid versions of its product
-* **[Ghost](https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost)** is a nonprofit with a paid managed service
+* **[Sidekiq](https://github.com/mperham/sidekiq)** biedt betaalde versies voor extra ondersteuning
+* **[Travis CI](https://github.com/travis-ci)** biedt betaalde versies van zijn product
+* **[Ghost](https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost)** is een non-profitorganisatie met een betaalde beheerde service
-Some popular projects, like [npm](https://github.com/npm/npm) and [Docker](https://github.com/docker/docker), even raise venture capital to support their business growth.
+Sommige populaire projecten, zoals [npm](https://github.com/npm/npm) en [Docker](https://github.com/docker/docker), halen zelfs risicokapitaal op om de groei van hun bedrijf te ondersteunen.
-### Apply for grant funding
+### Subsidie aanvragen
-Some software foundations and companies offer grants for open source work. Sometimes, grants can be paid out to individuals without setting up a legal entity for the project.
+Sommige softwarestichtingen en bedrijven bieden beurzen aan voor open source-werk. Soms kunnen subsidies worden uitbetaald aan individuen zonder een juridische entiteit voor het project op te richten.
-* **[Read the Docs](https://github.com/rtfd/readthedocs.org)** received a grant from [Mozilla Open Source Support](https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/grants/)
-* **[OpenMRS](https://github.com/openmrs)** work was funded by [Stripe's Open-Source Retreat](https://stripe.com/blog/open-source-retreat-2016-grantees)
-* **[Libraries.io](https://github.com/librariesio)** received a grant from the [Sloan Foundation](https://sloan.org/programs/digital-technology)
-* The **[Python Software Foundation](https://www.python.org/psf/grants/)** offers grants for Python-related work
+* **[Read the Docs](https://github.com/rtfd/readthedocs.org)** ontving een subsidie van [Mozilla Open Source Support](https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/grants/)
+* **[OpenMRS](https://github.com/openmrs)** werk werd gefinancierd door [Stripe's Open-Source Retreat](https://stripe.com/blog/open-source-retreat-2016-grantees)
+* **[Libraries.io](https://github.com/librariesio)** heeft een subsidie ontvangen van de [Sloan Foundation](https://sloan.org/programs/digital-technology)
+* De **[Python Software Foundation](https://www.python.org/psf/grants/)** biedt beurzen aan voor Python-gerelateerd werk
-For more detailed options and case studies, @nayafia [wrote a guide](https://github.com/nayafia/lemonade-stand) to getting paid for open source work. Different types of funding require different skills, so consider your strengths to figure out which option works best for you.
+Voor meer gedetailleerde opties en casestudy's, @nayafia [schreef een gids](https://github.com/nayafia/lemonade-stand) om betaald te worden voor open source werk. Verschillende soorten financiering vereisen verschillende vaardigheden, dus overweeg uw sterke punten om erachter te komen welke optie voor u het beste werkt.
-## Building a case for financial support
+## Het bouwen van een case voor financiële steun
-Whether your project is a new idea, or has been around for years, you should expect to put significant thought into identifying your target funder and making a compelling case.
+Of uw project nu een nieuw idee is of al jaren bestaat, u moet verwachten dat u veel aandacht besteedt aan het identificeren van uw beoogde financier en het maken van een overtuigende zaak.
-Whether you're looking to pay for your own time, or fundraise for a project, you should be able to answer the following questions.
+Of je nu voor je eigen tijd wilt betalen of geld wilt inzamelen voor een project, je zou de volgende vragen moeten kunnen beantwoorden.
-### Impact
+### Gevolg
-Why is this project useful? Why do your users, or potential users, like it so much? Where will it be in five years?
+Waarom is dit project nuttig? Waarom vinden uw (potentiële) gebruikers het zo leuk? Waar zal het zijn over vijf jaar?
-### Traction
+### Tractie
-Try to collect evidence that your project matters, whether it's metrics, anecdotes, or testimonials. Are there any companies or noteworthy people using your project right now? If not, has a prominent person endorsed it?
+Probeer bewijs te verzamelen dat uw project ertoe doet, of het nu gaat om statistieken, anekdotes of getuigenissen. Zijn er op dit moment bedrijven of opmerkelijke mensen die uw project gebruiken? Zo nee, heeft een vooraanstaand persoon het onderschreven?
-### Value to funder
+### Waarde voor financier
-Funders, whether your employer or a grantmaking foundation, are frequently approached with opportunities. Why should they support your project over any other opportunity? How do they personally benefit?
+Financiers, of het nu uw werkgever of een stichting is, worden vaak benaderd met kansen. Waarom zouden ze uw project beter ondersteunen dan elke andere mogelijkheid? Hoe profiteren ze persoonlijk?
-### Use of funds
+### Gebruik van fondsen
-What, exactly, will you accomplish with the proposed funding? Focus on project milestones or outcomes rather than paying a salary.
+Wat gaat u precies bereiken met de voorgestelde financiering? Concentreer u op mijlpalen of resultaten van projecten in plaats van een salaris te betalen.
-### How you'll receive the funds
+### Hoe u het geld ontvangt
-Does the funder have any requirements around disbursal? For example, you may need to be a nonprofit or have a nonprofit fiscal sponsor. Or perhaps the funds must be given to an individual contractor rather than an organization. These requirements vary between funders, so be sure to do your research beforehand.
+Heeft de financier enige vereisten met betrekking tot uitbetaling? U moet bijvoorbeeld een non-profitorganisatie zijn of een fiscale sponsor hebben. Of misschien moet het geld aan een individuele aannemer worden gegeven in plaats van aan een organisatie. Deze vereisten variëren tussen financiers, dus zorg ervoor dat u van tevoren uw onderzoek doet.
- For years, we've been the leading resource of website friendly icons, with a community of over 20 million people and been featured on over 70 million websites, including Whitehouse.gov. (...) Version 4 was three years ago. Web tech's changed a lot since then, and frankly, Font Awesome's gotten a bit stale. (...) That's why we're introducing Font Awesome 5. We're modernizing and rewriting the CSS and redesigning every icon from top to bottom. We're talking better design, better consistency, and better readability.
+ We zijn al jaren de toonaangevende bron van websitevriendelijke pictogrammen, met een community van meer dan 20 miljoen mensen en zijn te zien op meer dan 70 miljoen websites, waaronder Whitehouse.gov. (...) Versie 4 bestond drie jaar geleden. Webtechnologie is sindsdien veel veranderd, en eerlijk gezegd is Font Awesome een beetje muf geworden. (...) Daarom introduceren we Font Awesome 5. We moderniseren en herschrijven de CSS en herontwerpen elk pictogram van boven naar beneden. We hebben het over een beter ontwerp, betere consistentie en betere leesbaarheid.
+
+ _For years, we've been the leading resource of website friendly icons, with a community of over 20 million people and been featured on over 70 million websites, including Whitehouse.gov. (...) Version 4 was three years ago. Web tech's changed a lot since then, and frankly, Font Awesome's gotten a bit stale. (...) That's why we're introducing Font Awesome 5. We're modernizing and rewriting the CSS and redesigning every icon from top to bottom. We're talking better design, better consistency, and better readability._
— @davegandy, [Font Awesome Kickstarter video](https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/232193852/font-awesome-5)
-## Experiment and don't give up
+## Experimenteer en geef niet op
-Raising money isn't easy, whether you're an open source project, a nonprofit, or a software startup, and in most cases require you to get creative. Identifying how you want to get paid, doing your research, and putting yourself in your funder's shoes will help you build a convincing case for funding.
+Geld inzamelen is niet eenvoudig, of je nu een open source-project, een non-profitorganisatie of een software-startup bent, en in de meeste gevallen moet je creatief zijn. Door vast te stellen hoe u betaald wilt worden, onderzoek te doen en uzelf in de schoenen van uw financier te verplaatsen, kunt u een overtuigende zaak voor financiering opbouwen.
From 70409e3ca1361a916da42c6dcf4cb62c94d921fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley de Groot
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:33:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 069/749] Article 'Metrics'
---
_articles/nl/building-community.md | 2 +-
_articles/nl/how-to-contribute.md | 28 ++---
_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md | 38 +++----
_articles/nl/legal.md | 36 +++---
_articles/nl/metrics.md | 128 +++++++++++-----------
_articles/nl/starting-a-project.md | 28 ++---
6 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/nl/building-community.md b/_articles/nl/building-community.md
index 82be15f49b5..cde8653013c 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/building-community.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/building-community.md
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Begin met uw documentatie:
* **Als iemand nieuw op uw project komt, bedank hem dan voor zijn interesse!** Er is maar één negatieve ervaring nodig om ervoor te zorgen dat iemand niet meer terug wil komen.
* **Wees responsief.** Als u een maand lang niet op hun probleem reageert, is de kans groot dat ze uw project al zijn vergeten.
-* **Sta open voor de soorten bijdragen die u accepteert.** Veel bijdragers beginnen met een bugrapport of een kleine oplossing. Er zijn [veel manieren om bij te dragen](../how-to-contribute/#what-it-means-to-contribute) aan een project. Laat mensen helpen zoals ze willen helpen.
+* **Sta open voor de soorten bijdragen die u accepteert.** Veel bijdragers beginnen met een bugrapport of een kleine oplossing. Er zijn [veel manieren om bij te dragen](../how-to-contribute/#waarom-bijdragen-aan-open-source) aan een project. Laat mensen helpen zoals ze willen helpen.
* **Als er een bijdrage is waar u het niet mee eens bent,** bedank ze voor hun idee, en [vertel waarom](../best-practices/#nee-leren-zeggen) het niet past in de scope van het project en linkt naar relevante documentatie als je die hebt.
diff --git a/_articles/nl/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/nl/how-to-contribute.md
index c02def3ef02..0d67031233f 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
---
lang: nl
-title: How to Contribute to Open Source
-description: Want to contribute to open source? A guide to making open source contributions, for first-timers and for veterans.
+title: Hoe u kunt bijdragen aan Open Source
+description: Wil je bijdragen aan open source? Een gids voor het maken van open source-bijdragen, voor beginners en veteranen.
class: contribute
toc:
- why-contribute-to-open-source: "Why contribute to open source?"
- what-it-means-to-contribute: "What it means to contribute"
- orienting-yourself-to-a-new-project: "Orienting yourself to a new project"
- finding-a-project-to-contribute-to: "Finding a project to contribute to"
- how-to-submit-a-contribution: "How to submit a contribution"
- what-happens-after-you-submit-a-contribution: "What happens after you submit a contribution"
+ why-contribute-to-open-source: "Waarom bijdragen aan open source?"
+ what-it-means-to-contribute: "Wat het betekent om bij te dragen"
+ orienting-yourself-to-a-new-project: "Je oriënteren op een nieuw project"
+ finding-a-project-to-contribute-to: "Een project vinden om aan bij te dragen"
+ how-to-submit-a-contribution: "Hoe u een bijdrage kunt indienen"
+ what-happens-after-you-submit-a-contribution: "Wat gebeurt er nadat u een bijdrage heeft ingeleverd?"
order: 1
image: /assets/images/cards/contribute.png
related:
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ related:
- building
---
-## Why contribute to open source?
+## Waarom bijdragen aan open source?
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ Open source offers opportunities to practice leadership and management skills, s
You don't have to become a lifelong contributor to enjoy participating in open source. Have you ever seen a typo on a website, and wished someone would fix it? On an open source project, you can do just that. Open source helps people feel agency over their lives and how they experience the world, and that in itself is gratifying.
-## What it means to contribute
+## Wat het betekent om bij te dragen
If you're a new open source contributor, the process can be intimidating. How do you find the right project? What if you don't know how to code? What if something goes wrong?
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ For example:
Even if you're a software developer, working on a documentation project can help you get started in open source. It's often less intimidating to work on projects that don't involve code, and the process of collaboration will build your confidence and experience.
-## Orienting yourself to a new project
+## Je oriënteren op een nieuw project
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ Finally, open source projects use the following tools to organize discussion. Re
* **Discussion forums or mailing lists:** Some projects may use these channels for conversational topics (for example, _"How do I..."_ or _"What do you think about..."_ instead of bug reports or feature requests). Others use the issue tracker for all conversations.
* **Synchronous chat channel:** Some projects use chat channels (such as Slack or IRC) for casual conversation, collaboration, and quick exchanges.
-## Finding a project to contribute to
+## Een project vinden om aan bij te dragen
Now that you've figured out how open source projects work, it's time to find a project to contribute to!
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ A project that is friendly and welcoming signals that they will be receptive to
-## How to submit a contribution
+## Hoe u een bijdrage kunt indienen
You've found a project you like, and you're ready to make a contribution. Finally! Here's how to get your contribution in the right way.
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ If the project is on GitHub, here's how to submit a pull request:
If this is your first pull request, check out [Make a Pull Request](http://makeapullrequest.com/), which @kentcdodds created as a walkthrough video tutorial. You can also practice making a pull request in the [First Contributions](https://github.com/Roshanjossey/first-contributions) repository, created by @Roshanjossey.
-## What happens after you submit a contribution
+## Wat gebeurt er nadat u een bijdrage heeft ingeleverd?
You did it! Congratulations on becoming an open source contributor. We hope it's the first of many.
diff --git a/_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md b/_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md
index 1dcb6feadcc..b63e1d92aff 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md
@@ -1,17 +1,17 @@
---
lang: nl
-title: Leadership and Governance
-description: Growing open source projects can benefit from formal rules for making decisions.
+title: Leiderschap en bestuur
+description: Groeiende open source-projecten kunnen profiteren van formele regels voor het nemen van beslissingen.
class: leadership
toc:
- understanding-governance-for-your-growing-project: "Understanding governance for your growing project"
- what-are-examples-of-formal-roles-used-in-open-source-projects: "What are examples of formal roles used in open source projects?"
- how-do-i-formalize-these-leadership-roles: "How do I formalize these leadership roles?"
- when-should-i-give-someone-commit-access: "When should I give someone commit access?"
- what-are-some-of-the-common-governance-structures-for-open-source-projects: "What are some of the common governance structures for open source projects?"
- do-i-need-governance-docs-when-i-launch-my-project: "Do I need governance docs when I launch my project?"
- what-happens-if-corporate-employees-start-submitting-contributions: "What happens if corporate employees start submitting contributions?"
- do-i-need-a-legal-entity-to-support-my-project: "Do I need a legal entity to support my project?"
+ understanding-governance-for-your-growing-project: "Inzicht in governance voor uw groeiende project"
+ what-are-examples-of-formal-roles-used-in-open-source-projects: "Wat zijn voorbeelden van formele rollen die worden gebruikt in open source-projecten?"
+ how-do-i-formalize-these-leadership-roles: "Hoe formaliseer ik deze leiderschapsrollen?"
+ when-should-i-give-someone-commit-access: "Wanneer moet ik iemand commit-toegang geven?"
+ what-are-some-of-the-common-governance-structures-for-open-source-projects: "Wat zijn enkele van de algemene bestuursstructuren voor open source-projecten?"
+ do-i-need-governance-docs-when-i-launch-my-project: "Heb ik beheersdocumenten nodig wanneer ik mijn project start?"
+ what-happens-if-corporate-employees-start-submitting-contributions: "Wat gebeurt er als bedrijfsmedewerkers bijdragen beginnen in te dienen?"
+ do-i-need-a-legal-entity-to-support-my-project: "Heb ik een juridische entiteit nodig om mijn project te ondersteunen?"
order: 6
image: /assets/images/cards/leadership.png
related:
@@ -19,11 +19,11 @@ related:
- metrics
---
-## Understanding governance for your growing project
+## Inzicht in governance voor uw groeiende project
Your project is growing, people are engaged, and you're committed to keeping this thing going. At this stage, you may be wondering how to incorporate regular project contributors into your workflow, whether it's giving someone commit access or resolving community debates. If you have questions, we've got answers.
-## What are examples of formal roles used in open source projects?
+## Wat zijn voorbeelden van formele rollen die worden gebruikt in open source-projecten?
Many projects follow a similar structure for contributor roles and recognition.
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ A maintainer doesn't necessarily have to be someone who writes code for your pro
**The term "committer"** might be used to distinguish commit access, which is a specific type of responsibility, from other forms of contribution.
-While you can define your project roles any way you'd like, [consider using broader definitions](../how-to-contribute/#what-it-means-to-contribute) to encourage more forms of contribution. You can use leadership roles to formally recognize people who have made outstanding contributions to your project, regardless of their technical skill.
+While you can define your project roles any way you'd like, [consider using broader definitions](../how-to-contribute/#waarom-bijdragen-aan-open-source) to encourage more forms of contribution. You can use leadership roles to formally recognize people who have made outstanding contributions to your project, regardless of their technical skill.
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ While you can define your project roles any way you'd like, [consider using broa
-## How do I formalize these leadership roles?
+## Hoe formaliseer ik deze leiderschapsrollen?
Formalizing your leadership roles helps people feel ownership and tells other community members who to look to for help.
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Tools like [Vossibility](https://github.com/icecrime/vossibility-stack) can help
Finally, if your project is on GitHub, consider moving your project from your personal account to an Organization and adding at least one backup admin. [GitHub Organizations](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-new-organization-account/) make it easier to manage permissions and multiple repositories and protect your project's legacy through [shared ownership](../building-community/#deel-het-eigendom-van-uw-project).
-## When should I give someone commit access?
+## Wanneer moet ik iemand commit-toegang geven?
Some people think you should give commit access to everybody who makes a contribution. Doing so could encourage more people to feel ownership of your project.
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ If your project is on GitHub, you can use [protected branches](https://help.gith
-## What are some of the common governance structures for open source projects?
+## Wat zijn enkele van de algemene bestuursstructuren voor open source-projecten?
There are three common governance structures associated with open source projects.
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ Which one should you use? It's up to you! Every model has advantages and trade-o
* [Meritocracy model template](http://oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/meritocraticgovernancemodel)
* [Node.js's liberal contribution policy](https://medium.com/the-node-js-collection/healthy-open-source-967fa8be7951)
-## Do I need governance docs when I launch my project?
+## Heb ik beheersdocumenten nodig wanneer ik mijn project start?
There is no right time to write down your project's governance, but it's much easier to define once you've seen your community dynamics play out. The best (and hardest) part about open source governance is that it is shaped by the community!
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ If you're part of a company launching an open source project, it's worth having
-## What happens if corporate employees start submitting contributions?
+## Wat gebeurt er als bedrijfsmedewerkers bijdragen beginnen in te dienen?
Successful open source projects get used by many people and companies, and some companies may eventually have revenue streams eventually tied to the project. For example, a company may use the project's code as one component in a commercial service offering.
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ It's important to treat commercial activity as normal and as just another source
Like anyone else, commercially-motivated developers gain influence in the project through the quality and quantity of their contributions. Obviously, a developer who is paid for her time may be able to do more than someone who is not paid, but that's okay: payment is just one of many possible factors that could affect how much someone does. Keep your project discussions focused on the contributions, not on the external factors that enable people to make those contributions.
-## Do I need a legal entity to support my project?
+## Heb ik een juridische entiteit nodig om mijn project te ondersteunen?
You don't need a legal entity to support your open source project unless you're handling money.
diff --git a/_articles/nl/legal.md b/_articles/nl/legal.md
index 02b8fb25799..e6e35f7ede4 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/legal.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/legal.md
@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
---
lang: nl
-title: The Legal Side of Open Source
-description: Everything you've ever wondered about the legal side of open source, and a few things you didn't.
+title: De juridische kant van open source
+description: Alles wat je je ooit hebt afgevraagd over de juridische kant van open source, en een paar dingen die je niet deed.
class: legal
toc:
- why-do-people-care-so-much-about-the-legal-side-of-open-source: "Why do people care so much about the legal side of open source?"
- are-public-github-projects-open-source: "Are public GitHub projects open source?"
- just-give-me-the-tldr-on-what-i-need-to-protect-my-project: "Just give me the TL;DR on what I need to protect my project"
- which-open-source-license-is-appropriate-for-my-project: "Which open source license is appropriate for my project?"
- what-if-i-want-to-change-the-license-of-my-project: "What if I want to change the license of my project?"
- does-my-project-need-an-additional-contributor-agreement: "Does my project need an additional contributor agreement?"
- what-does-my-companys-legal-team-need-to-know: "What does my company’s legal team need to know?"
+ why-do-people-care-so-much-about-the-legal-side-of-open-source: "Waarom geven mensen zoveel om de juridische kant van open source?"
+ are-public-github-projects-open-source: "Zijn openbare GitHub-projecten open source?"
+ just-give-me-the-tldr-on-what-i-need-to-protect-my-project: "Geef me gewoon de TL;DR over wat ik nodig heb om mijn project te beschermen"
+ which-open-source-license-is-appropriate-for-my-project: "Welke open source-licentie is geschikt voor mijn project?"
+ what-if-i-want-to-change-the-license-of-my-project: "Wat moet ik doen als ik de licentie van mijn project wil wijzigen?"
+ does-my-project-need-an-additional-contributor-agreement: "Heeft mijn project een aanvullende contribuantenovereenkomst nodig?"
+ what-does-my-companys-legal-team-need-to-know: "Wat moet het juridische team van mijn bedrijf weten?"
order: 10
image: /assets/images/cards/legal.png
related:
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ related:
Sharing your creative work with the world can be an exciting and rewarding experience. It can also mean a bunch of legal things you didn't know you had to worry about. Thankfully, you don't have to start from scratch. We've got your legal needs covered. (Before you dig in, be sure to read our [disclaimer](/notices/).)
-## Why do people care so much about the legal side of open source?
+## Waarom geven mensen zoveel om de juridische kant van open source?
Glad you asked! When you make a creative work (such as writing, graphics, or code), that work is under exclusive copyright by default. That is, the law assumes that as the author of your work, you have a say in what others can do with it.
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ If you don't apply an open source license, everybody who contributes to your pro
Finally, your project may have dependencies with license requirements that you weren't aware of. Your project's community, or your employer's policies, may also require your project to use specific open source licenses. We'll cover these situations below.
-## Are public GitHub projects open source?
+## Zijn openbare GitHub-projecten open source?
When you [create a new project](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-new-repository/) on GitHub, you have the option to make the repository **private** or **public**.
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ When you [create a new project](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-new-
If you want others to use, distribute, modify, or contribute back to your project, you need to include an open source license. For example, someone cannot legally use any part of your GitHub project in their code, even if it's public, unless you explicitly give them the right to do so.
-## Just give me the TL;DR on what I need to protect my project.
+## Geef me gewoon de TL;DR over wat ik nodig heb om mijn project te beschermen
You're in luck, because today, open source licenses are standardized and easy to use. You can copy-paste an existing license directly into your project.
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ When you create a new project on GitHub, you'll be [asked to add a license](http
-## Which open source license is appropriate for my project?
+## Welke open source-licentie is geschikt voor mijn project?
If you're starting from a blank slate, it's hard to go wrong with the [MIT License](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/). It's short, very easy to understand, and allows anyone to do anything so long as they keep a copy of the license, including your copyright notice. You'll be able to release the project under a different license if you ever need to.
@@ -76,11 +76,11 @@ You may also want to consider the **communities** you hope will use and contribu
* **Do you want your project to appeal to large businesses?** A large business will likely want an express patent license from all contributors. In this case, [Apache 2.0](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/) has you (and them) covered.
* **Do you want your project to appeal to contributors who do not want their contributions to be used in closed source software?** [GPLv3](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/gpl-3.0/) or (if they also do not wish to contribute to closed source services) [AGPLv3](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/agpl-3.0/) will go over well.
-Your **company** may have specific licensing requirements for its open source projects. For example, it may require a permissive license so that the company can use your project in the company's closed source product. Or your company may require a strong copyleft license and an additional contributor agreement (see below) so that only your company, and nobody else, can use your project in closed source software. Or your company may have certain needs related to standards, social responsibility, or transparency, any of which could require a particular licensing strategy. Talk to your [company's legal department](#what-does-my-companys-legal-team-need-to-know).
+Your **company** may have specific licensing requirements for its open source projects. For example, it may require a permissive license so that the company can use your project in the company's closed source product. Or your company may require a strong copyleft license and an additional contributor agreement (see below) so that only your company, and nobody else, can use your project in closed source software. Or your company may have certain needs related to standards, social responsibility, or transparency, any of which could require a particular licensing strategy. Talk to your [company's legal department](#wat-moet-het-juridische-team-van-mijn-bedrijf-weten).
When you create a new project on GitHub, you are given the option to select a license. Including one of the licenses mentioned above will make your GitHub project open source. If you'd like to see other options, check out [choosealicense.com](https://choosealicense.com) to find the right license for your project, even if it [isn't software](https://choosealicense.com/non-software/).
-## What if I want to change the license of my project?
+## Wat moet ik doen als ik de licentie van mijn project wil wijzigen?
Most projects never need to change licenses. But occasionally circumstances change.
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ For example, as your project grows it adds dependencies or users, or your compan
Alternatively, you can have contributors agree in advance (via an additional contributor agreement -- see below) to certain license changes under certain conditions, beyond those allowed by your existing open source license. This shifts the complexity of changing licenses a bit. You'll need more help from your lawyers up front, and you'll still want to clearly communicate with your project's stakeholders when executing a license change.
-## Does my project need an additional contributor agreement?
+## Heeft mijn project een aanvullende contribuantenovereenkomst nodig?
Probably not. For the vast majority of open source projects, an open source license implicitly serves as both the inbound (from contributors) and outbound (to other contributors and users) license. If your project is on GitHub, the GitHub Terms of Service make "inbound=outbound" the [explicit default](https://help.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-terms-of-service#6-contributions-under-repository-license).
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ Some situations where you may want to consider an additional contributor agreeme
If you do need to use an additional contributor agreement with your project, consider using an integration such as [CLA assistant](https://github.com/cla-assistant/cla-assistant) to minimize contributor distraction.
-## What does my company's legal team need to know?
+## Wat moet het juridische team van mijn bedrijf weten?
If you're releasing an open source project as a company employee, first, your legal team should know that you're open sourcing a project.
@@ -163,4 +163,4 @@ Longer term, your legal team can do more to help the company get more from its i
* **Patents:** Your company may wish to join the [Open Invention Network](https://www.openinventionnetwork.com/), a shared defensive patent pool to protect members' use of major open source projects, or explore other [alternative patent licensing](https://www.eff.org/document/hacking-patent-system-2016).
-* **Governance:** Especially if and when it makes sense to move a project to a [legal entity outside of the company](../leadership-and-governance/#do-i-need-a-legal-entity-to-support-my-project).
+* **Governance:** Especially if and when it makes sense to move a project to a [legal entity outside of the company](../leadership-and-governance/#heb-ik-een-juridische-entiteit-nodig-om-mijn-project-te-ondersteunen).
diff --git a/_articles/nl/metrics.md b/_articles/nl/metrics.md
index 60a2a72d703..3a755bff52f 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/metrics.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/metrics.md
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
---
lang: nl
-title: Open Source Metrics
-description: Make informed decisions to help your open source project thrive by measuring and tracking its success.
+title: Open source-statistieken
+description: Neem weloverwogen beslissingen om uw open source-project te laten gedijen door het succes ervan te meten en bij te houden.
class: metrics
toc:
- why-measure-anything: "Why measure anything?"
- discovery: "Discovery"
- usage: "Usage"
+ why-measure-anything: "Waarom iets meten?"
+ discovery: "Ontdekking"
+ usage: "Gebruik"
retention: "Retention"
- maintainer-activity: "Maintainer activity"
+ maintainer-activity: "open source beheerdersactiviteit"
order: 9
image: /assets/images/cards/metrics.png
related:
@@ -16,117 +16,119 @@ related:
- best-practices
---
-## Why measure anything?
+## Waarom iets meten?
-Data, when used wisely, can help you make better decisions as an open source maintainer.
+Data, mits verstandig gebruikt, kunnen u helpen betere beslissingen te nemen als open source-onderhouder.
-With more information, you can:
+Met meer informatie kunt u:
-* Understand how users respond to a new feature
-* Figure out where new users come from
-* Identify, and decide whether to support, an outlier use case or functionality
-* Quantify your project's popularity
-* Understand how your project is used
-* Raise money through sponsorships and grants
+* Begrijp hoe gebruikers reageren op een nieuwe functie
+* Zoek uit waar nieuwe gebruikers vandaan komen
+* Identificeer, en beslis of u een uitbijtergebruikscasus of -functionaliteit wilt ondersteunen
+* Kwantificeer de populariteit van uw project
+* Begrijp hoe uw project wordt gebruikt
+* Zamel geld in via sponsoring en beurzen
-For example, [Homebrew](https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/blob/bbed7246bc5c5b7acb8c1d427d10b43e090dfd39/docs/Analytics.md) finds that Google Analytics helps them prioritize work:
+[Homebrew](https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/blob/bbed7246bc5c5b7acb8c1d427d10b43e090dfd39/docs/Analytics.md) stelt bijvoorbeeld vast dat Google Analytics hen helpt bij het prioriteren van werk:
-> Homebrew is provided free of charge and run entirely by volunteers in their spare time. As a result, we do not have the resources to do detailed user studies of Homebrew users to decide on how best to design future features and prioritise current work. Anonymous aggregate user analytics allow us to prioritise fixes and features based on how, where and when people use Homebrew.
+> Homebrew wordt gratis verstrekt en wordt in hun vrije tijd volledig gerund door vrijwilligers. Als gevolg hiervan hebben we niet de middelen om gedetailleerde gebruikersstudies van Homebrew-gebruikers uit te voeren om te beslissen hoe toekomstige functies het beste kunnen worden ontworpen en prioriteit kunnen worden gegeven aan huidig werk. Anonieme geaggregeerde gebruikersanalyses stellen ons in staat om prioriteit te geven aan fixes en functies op basis van hoe, waar en wanneer mensen Homebrew gebruiken.
-Popularity isn't everything. Everybody gets into open source for different reasons. If your goal as an open source maintainer is to show off your work, be transparent about your code, or just have fun, metrics may not be important to you.
+Populariteit is niet alles. Iedereen komt om verschillende redenen in open source. Als het je doel is als open source-onderhouder om te pronken met je werk, transparant te zijn over je code of gewoon plezier te hebben, dan zijn metrics misschien niet belangrijk voor je.
-If you _are_ interested in understanding your project on a deeper level, read on for ways to analyze your project's activity.
+Als u _geïnteresseerd_ bent om uw project op een dieper niveau te begrijpen, lees dan verder voor manieren om de activiteit van uw project te analyseren.
-## Discovery
+## Ontdekking
-Before anybody can use or contribute back to your project, they need to know it exists. Ask yourself: _are people finding this project?_
+Voordat iemand uw project kan gebruiken of eraan kan bijdragen, moet hij of zij weten dat het bestaat. Stel uzelf de vraag: _vinden mensen dit project?_
![Traffic graph](/assets/images/metrics/repo_traffic_graphs_tooltip.png)
-If your project is hosted on GitHub, [you can view](https://help.github.com/articles/about-repository-graphs/#traffic) how many people land on your project and where they come from. From your project's page, click "Insights", then "Traffic". On this page, you can see:
+Als je project wordt gehost op GitHub, [je kunt zien](https://help.github.com/articles/about-repository-graphs/#traffic) hoeveel mensen op je project terechtkomen en waar ze vandaan komen. Klik op de pagina van uw project op "Insights" en vervolgens op "Traffic". Op deze pagina ziet u:
-* **Total page views:** Tells you how many times your project was viewed
+* **Total page views:** geeft aan hoe vaak uw project is bekeken
-* **Total unique visitors:** Tells you how many people viewed your project
+* **Total unique visitors:** geeft aan hoeveel mensen uw project hebben bekeken
-* **Referring sites:** Tells you where visitors came from. This metric can help you figure out where to reach your audience and whether your promotion efforts are working.
+* **Referring sites:** vertelt u waar bezoekers vandaan kwamen. Deze statistiek kan u helpen erachter te komen waar u uw publiek kunt bereiken en of uw promotie-inspanningen werken.
-* **Popular content:** Tells you where visitors go on your project, broken down by page views and unique visitors.
+* **Populaire content:** vertelt u waar bezoekers naartoe gaan in uw project, uitgesplitst naar paginaweergaven en unieke bezoekers.
-[GitHub stars](https://help.github.com/articles/about-stars/) can also help provide a baseline measure of popularity. While GitHub stars don't necessarily correlate to downloads and usage, they can tell you how many people are taking notice of your work.
+[GitHub stars](https://help.github.com/articles/about-stars/) kan ook helpen bij het geven van een basismeting van populariteit. Hoewel GitHub-sterren niet noodzakelijkerwijs verband houden met downloads en gebruik, kunnen ze u wel vertellen hoeveel mensen kennis nemen van uw werk.
-You may also want to [track discoverability in specific places](https://opensource.com/business/16/6/pirate-metrics): for example, Google PageRank, referral traffic from your project's website, or referrals from other open source projects or websites.
+U kunt ook [vindbaarheid op specifieke plaatsen bijhouden](https://opensource.com/business/16/6/pirate-metrics): bijvoorbeeld Google PageRank, verwijzingsverkeer van de website van uw project of verwijzingen van andere open bronprojecten of websites.
-## Usage
+## Gebruik
-People are finding your project on this wild and crazy thing we call the internet. Ideally, when they see your project, they'll feel compelled to do something. The second question you'll want to ask is: _are people using this project?_
+Mensen vinden uw project op dit wilde en gekke ding dat we internet noemen. Idealiter voelen ze zich genoodzaakt om iets te doen als ze uw project zien. De tweede vraag die u wilt stellen is: _gebruiken mensen dit project?_
-If you use a package manager, such as npm or RubyGems.org, to distribute your project, you may be able to track your project's downloads.
+Als u een pakketbeheerder gebruikt, zoals npm of RubyGems.org, om uw project te distribueren, kunt u mogelijk de downloads van uw project volgen.
-Each package manager may use a slightly different definition of "download", and downloads do not necessarily correlate to installs or use, but it provides some baseline for comparison. Try using [Libraries.io](https://libraries.io/) to track usage statistics across many popular package managers.
+Elke pakketbeheerder kan een iets andere definitie van "downloaden" gebruiken, en downloads correleren niet noodzakelijkerwijs met installaties of gebruik, maar het biedt een basis ter vergelijking. Probeer [Libraries.io](https://libraries.io/) te gebruiken om gebruiksstatistieken bij te houden van veel populaire pakketbeheerders.
-If your project is on GitHub, navigate again to the "Traffic" page. You can use the [clone graph](https://github.com/blog/1873-clone-graphs) to see how many times your project has been cloned on a given day, broken down by total clones and unique cloners.
+Als je project op GitHub staat, navigeer dan opnieuw naar de "Traffic"-pagina. U kunt de [kloongrafiek](https://github.com/blog/1873-clone-graphs) gebruiken om te zien hoe vaak uw project op een bepaalde dag is gekloond, opgesplitst in totaal aantal klonen en unieke klonen.
![Clone graph](/assets/images/metrics/clone_graph.png)
-If usage is low compared to the number of people discovering your project, there are two issues to consider. Either:
+Als het gebruik laag is in vergelijking met het aantal mensen dat uw project ontdekt, zijn er twee zaken waarmee u rekening moet houden. Een van beide:
-* Your project isn't successfully converting your audience, or
-* You're attracting the wrong audience
+* Uw project slaagt er niet in uw publiek te converteren, of
+* Je trekt het verkeerde publiek aan
-For example, if your project lands on the front page of Hacker News, you'll probably see a spike in discovery (traffic), but a lower conversion rate, because you're reaching everyone on Hacker News. If your Ruby project is featured at a Ruby conference, however, you're more likely to see a high conversion rate from a targeted audience.
+Als uw project bijvoorbeeld op de voorpagina van Hacker News belandt, ziet u waarschijnlijk een piek in de ontdekking (verkeer), maar een lagere conversieratio, omdat u iedereen op Hacker News bereikt. Als uw Ruby-project echter wordt gepresenteerd op een Ruby-conferentie, is de kans groter dat u een hoge conversieratio ziet bij een gericht publiek.
-Try to figure out where your audience is coming from and ask others for feedback on your project page to figure out which of these two issues you're facing.
+Probeer erachter te komen waar uw publiek vandaan komt en vraag anderen om feedback op uw projectpagina om erachter te komen met welke van deze twee problemen u te maken heeft.
-Once you know that people are using your project, you might want to try to figure out what they are doing with it. Are they building on it by forking your code and adding features? Are they using it for science or business?
+Als je eenmaal weet dat mensen je project gebruiken, wil je misschien proberen erachter te komen wat ze ermee doen. Bouwen ze erop door uw code te forken en functies toe te voegen? Gebruiken ze het voor wetenschap of zaken?
-## Retention
+## Retentie
-People are finding your project and they're using it. The next question you'll want to ask yourself is: _are people contributing back to this project?_
+Mensen vinden uw project en ze gebruiken het. De volgende vraag die je jezelf wilt stellen is: _dragen mensen bij aan dit project?_
-It's never too early to start thinking about contributors. Without other people pitching in, you risk putting yourself into an unhealthy situation where your project is _popular_ (many people use it) but not _supported_ (not enough maintainer time to meet demand).
+Het is nooit te vroeg om na te denken over bijdragers. Zonder dat andere mensen meewerken, riskeer je jezelf in een ongezonde situatie te brengen waarin je project _populair_ is (veel mensen gebruiken het) maar niet _ondersteund_ (niet genoeg tijd om aan de vraag te voldoen).
-Retention also requires an [inflow of new contributors](http://blog.abigailcabunoc.com/increasing-developer-engagement-at-mozilla-science-learning-advocacy#contributor-pathways_2), as previously active contributors will eventually move on to other things.
+Retentie vereist ook een [instroom van nieuwe bijdragers](http://blog.abigailcabunoc.com/increasing-developer-engagement-at-mozilla-science-learning-advocacy#contributor-pathways_2), aangezien voorheen actieve bijdragers uiteindelijk verder zullen gaan naar andere dingen.
-Examples of community metrics that you may want to regularly track include:
+Voorbeelden van communitystatistieken die u regelmatig wilt bijhouden, zijn:
-* **Total contributor count and number of commits per contributor:** Tells you how many contributors you have, and who's more or less active. On GitHub, you can view this under "Insights" -> "Contributors." Right now, this graph only counts contributors who have committed to the default branch of the repository.
+* **Totaal aantal bijdragers en aantal commits per bijdrager:** vertelt je hoeveel bijdragers je hebt en wie er meer of minder actief is. Op GitHub kun je dit bekijken onder "Insights" -> "Contributors". Op dit moment telt deze grafiek alleen bijdragers die zich hebben gecommitteerd aan de standaardvertakking van de repository.
-![Contributor graph](/assets/images/metrics/repo_contributors_specific_graph.png)
+![Bijdrager-grafiek](/assets/images/metrics/repo_contributors_specific_graph.png)
-* **First time, casual, and repeat contributors:** Helps you track whether you're getting new contributors, and whether they come back. (Casual contributors are contributors with a low number of commits. Whether that's one commit, less than five commits, or something else is up to you.) Without new contributors, your project's community can become stagnant.
+* **Eerste keer, losse en terugkerende bijdragers:** Helpt u bij te houden of u nieuwe bijdragers krijgt en of ze terugkomen. (Toevallige bijdragers zijn bijdragers met een laag aantal commits. Of dat nu één commit is, minder dan vijf commits of iets anders, is aan jou.) Zonder nieuwe bijdragers kan de community van je project stagneren.
-* **Number of open issues and open pull requests:** If these numbers get too high, you might need help with issue triaging and code reviews.
+* **Aantal openstaande issues en openstaande pull-verzoeken:** Als deze aantallen te hoog worden, heb je wellicht hulp nodig bij het testen van issues en codebeoordelingen.
-* **Number of _opened_ issues and _opened_ pull requests:** Opened issues means somebody cares enough about your project to open an issue. If that number increases over time, it suggests people are interested in your project.
+* **Aantal _geopende_ issues en _geopende_ pull requests:** Geopende issues betekent dat iemand genoeg geeft om je project om een issue te openen. Als dat aantal in de loop van de tijd toeneemt, suggereert dit dat mensen geïnteresseerd zijn in uw project.
-* **Types of contributions:** For example, commits, fixing typos or bugs, or commenting on an issue.
+* **Soorten bijdragen:** Bijvoorbeeld commits, typefouten of bugs verhelpen, of commentaar geven op een probleem.
- Open source is more than just code. Successful open source projects include code and documentation contributions together with conversations about these changes.
+ Open source is meer dan alleen code. Succesvolle open source-projecten omvatten bijdragen aan code en documentatie, samen met gesprekken over deze veranderingen.
+
+ _Open source is more than just code. Successful open source projects include code and documentation contributions together with conversations about these changes._
— @arfon, ["The Shape of Open Source"](https://github.com/blog/2195-the-shape-of-open-source)
-## Maintainer activity
+## open source beheerdersactiviteit
-Finally, you'll want to close the loop by making sure your project's maintainers are able to handle the volume of contributions received. The last question you'll want to ask yourself is: _am I (or are we) responding to our community?_
+Ten slotte wilt u de cirkel sluiten door ervoor te zorgen dat de beheerders van uw project het volume van de ontvangen bijdragen aankunnen. De laatste vraag die je jezelf wilt stellen is: _Reageer ik (of zijn wij) op onze community?_
-Unresponsive maintainers become a bottleneck for open source projects. If someone submits a contribution but never hears back from a maintainer, they may feel discouraged and leave.
+Niet-reagerende beheerders worden een bottleneck voor open source-projecten. Als iemand een bijdrage indient maar nooit iets van een onderhouder hoort, kan hij of zij zich ontmoedigd voelen en vertrekken.
-[Research from Mozilla](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1hsJLv1ieSqtXBzd5YZusY-mB8e1VJzaeOmh8Q4VeMio/edit#slide=id.g43d857af8_0177) suggests that maintainer responsiveness is a critical factor in encouraging repeat contributions.
+[Onderzoek van Mozilla](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1hsJLv1ieSqtXBzd5YZusY-mB8e1VJzaeOmh8Q4VeMio/edit#slide=id.g43d857af8_0177) suggereert dat het reactievermogen van de open source-onderhouder een cruciale factor is bij het aanmoedigen van herhaalde bijdragen.
-Consider tracking how long it takes for you (or another maintainer) to respond to contributions, whether an issue or a pull request. Responding doesn't require taking action. It can be as simple as saying: _"Thanks for your submission! I'll review this within the next week."_
+Overweeg om bij te houden hoe lang het duurt voordat u (of een andere onderhouder) reageert op bijdragen, of dit nu een probleem of een pull-verzoek is. Reageren vereist geen actie. Het kan zo simpel zijn als te zeggen: _"Bedankt voor uw inzending! Ik zal dit binnen de komende week beoordelen."_
-You could also measure the time it takes to move between stages in the contribution process, such as:
+U kunt ook de tijd meten die nodig is om tussen fasen in het bijdrageproces te schakelen, zoals:
-* Average time an issue remains open
-* Whether issues get closed by PRs
-* Whether stale issues get closed
-* Average time to merge a pull request
+* Gemiddelde tijd dat een probleem open blijft
+* Of kwesties worden gesloten door PR's
+* Of oude problemen worden gesloten
+* Gemiddelde tijd om een pull-aanvraag samen te voegen
-## Use 📊 to learn about people
+## Gebruik 📊 om over mensen te leren
-Understanding metrics will help you build an active, growing open source project. Even if you don't track every metric on a dashboard, use the framework above to focus your attention on the type of behavior that will help your project thrive.
+Door statistieken te begrijpen, kunt u een actief, groeiend open source-project opzetten. Zelfs als u niet elke statistiek op een dashboard volgt, kunt u het bovenstaande framework gebruiken om uw aandacht te richten op het soort gedrag dat uw project zal helpen gedijen.
diff --git a/_articles/nl/starting-a-project.md b/_articles/nl/starting-a-project.md
index b7502bc5744..a52b65499d4 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/starting-a-project.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/starting-a-project.md
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
---
lang: nl
-title: Starting an Open Source Project
-description: Learn more about the world of open source and get ready to launch your own project.
+title: Een open source-project starten
+description: Leer meer over de wereld van open source en bereid je voor om je eigen project te lanceren.
class: beginners
toc:
- the-what-and-why-of-open-source: "The what and why of open source"
- should-i-launch-my-own-open-source-project: "Should I launch my own open source project?"
- launching-your-own-open-source-project: "Launching your own open source project"
- naming-and-branding-your-project: "Naming and branding your project"
- your-pre-launch-checklist: "Your pre-launch checklist"
+ the-what-and-why-of-open-source: "Het wat en waarom van open source"
+ should-i-launch-my-own-open-source-project: "Moet ik mijn eigen open source-project lanceren?"
+ launching-your-own-open-source-project: "Uw eigen open source-project lanceren"
+ naming-and-branding-your-project: "Geef uw project een naam en branding"
+ your-pre-launch-checklist: "Uw checklist vóór de lancering"
order: 2
image: /assets/images/cards/beginner.png
related:
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ related:
- building
---
-## The "what" and "why" of open source
+## Het "wat" en "waarom" van open source
So you're thinking about getting started with open source? Congratulations! The world appreciates your contribution. Let's talk about what open source is and why people do it.
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Because [an open source license requires](https://opensource.org/osd-annotated)
As a result, most open source projects are free, but "free of charge" is not part of the open source definition. There are ways to charge for open source projects indirectly through dual licensing or limited features, while still complying with the official definition of open source.
-## Should I launch my own open source project?
+## Moet ik mijn eigen open source-project lanceren?
The short answer is yes, because no matter the outcome, launching your own project is a great way to learn how open source works.
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ If your goal is to learn how to collaborate with others or understand how open s
If you're not sure how to get started as a contributor, check out our [How to Contribute to Open Source guide](../how-to-contribute/).
-## Launching your own open source project
+## Uw eigen open source-project lanceren
There is no perfect time to open source your work. You can open source an idea, a work in progress, or after years of being closed source.
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ Much like open source licenses, there are also emerging standards for codes of c
Paste the text directly into a CODE_OF_CONDUCT file in your repository. Keep the file in your project's root directory so it's easy to find, and link to it from your README.
-## Naming and branding your project
+## Geef uw project een naam en branding
Branding is more than a flashy logo or catchy project name. It's about how you talk about your project, and who you reach with your message.
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ Beyond how you write words, your coding style may also become part of your proje
It isn't necessary to write a style guide for your project when you're just starting out, and you may find that you enjoy incorporating different coding styles into your project anyway. But you should anticipate how your writing and coding style might attract or discourage different types of people. The earliest stages of your project are your opportunity to set the precedent you wish to see.
-## Your pre-launch checklist
+## Uw checklist vóór de lancering
Ready to open source your project? Here's a checklist to help. Check all the boxes? You're ready to go! [Click "publish"](https://help.github.com/articles/making-a-private-repository-public/) and pat yourself on the back.
@@ -357,6 +357,6 @@ If you're a company or organization:
-## You did it!
+## Je hebt het gedaan!
-Congratulations on open sourcing your first project. No matter the outcome, working in public is a gift to the community. With every commit, comment, and pull request, you're creating opportunities for yourself and for others to learn and grow.
+Gefeliciteerd met het openen van uw eerste project. Ongeacht de uitkomst, werken in het openbaar is een geschenk voor de gemeenschap. Met elk commit-, commentaar- en pull-verzoek creëer je kansen voor jezelf en voor anderen om te leren en te groeien.
From 763c9913f6f360dce74243f135eff5b587f90232 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley de Groot
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 16:19:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 070/749] Article 'Starting a project'
---
_articles/nl/building-community.md | 6 +-
_articles/nl/legal.md | 2 +-
_articles/nl/starting-a-project.md | 262 +++++++++++++++--------------
3 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/nl/building-community.md b/_articles/nl/building-community.md
index cde8653013c..ac1e1e6d370 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/building-community.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/building-community.md
@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ Bedenk bij het opbouwen van uw community hoe iemand bovenaan de trechter (een po
Begin met uw documentatie:
-* **Maak het voor iemand gemakkelijk om uw project te gebruiken.** [Een vriendelijke README](../starting-a-project/#writing-a-readme) en duidelijke codevoorbeelden maken het gemakkelijker voor iedereen die op uw project belandt om aan de slag te gaan.
-* **Leg duidelijk uit hoe u kunt bijdragen**, gebruik [je CONTRIBUTING bestand](../starting-a-project/#writing-your-contributing-guidelines) en uw issues up-to-date houden.
+* **Maak het voor iemand gemakkelijk om uw project te gebruiken.** [Een vriendelijke README](../starting-a-project/#een-readme-schrijven) en duidelijke codevoorbeelden maken het gemakkelijker voor iedereen die op uw project belandt om aan de slag te gaan.
+* **Leg duidelijk uit hoe u kunt bijdragen**, gebruik [je CONTRIBUTING-bestand](../starting-a-project/#schrijven-van-uw-bijdrage-richtlijnen) en uw issues up-to-date houden.
* **Goede first issues**: Overweeg expliciet om nieuwe bijdragers op weg te helpen [label issues die eenvoudig genoeg zijn voor beginners om aan te pakken](https://help.github.com/en/articles/helping-new-contributors-find-your-project-with-labels). GitHub zal deze issues vervolgens op verschillende plaatsen op het platform aan de oppervlakte brengen, waardoor nuttige bijdragen worden verhoogd en de wrijving wordt verminderd van gebruikers die problemen aanpakken die te moeilijk zijn voor hun niveau.
* [GitHub's Open Source-enquête 2017](http://opensourcesurvey.org/2017/) vertoonde onvolledige of verwarrende documentatie is het grootste probleem voor open source-gebruikers. Goede documentatie nodigt uit tot interactie met uw project. Uiteindelijk zal iemand een issue of pull request openen. Gebruik deze interacties als kansen om ze door de trechter te verplaatsen.
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ Het hoofd koel houden is niet eenvoudig, maar leiderschap tonen verbetert de gez
### Behandel uw README als een grondwet
-Uw README is [meer dan alleen een reeks instructies](../starting-a-project/#writing-a-readme). Het is ook een plek om te praten over uw doelen, productvisie en roadmap. Als mensen overdreven gefocust zijn op het bespreken van de waarde van een bepaalde functie, kan het helpen om je README opnieuw te bekijken en te praten over de hogere visie van je project. Focussen op je README maakt het gesprek ook onpersoonlijk, zodat je een constructieve discussie kunt voeren.
+Uw README is [meer dan alleen een reeks instructies](../starting-a-project/#een-readme-schrijven). Het is ook een plek om te praten over uw doelen, productvisie en roadmap. Als mensen overdreven gefocust zijn op het bespreken van de waarde van een bepaalde functie, kan het helpen om je README opnieuw te bekijken en te praten over de hogere visie van je project. Focussen op je README maakt het gesprek ook onpersoonlijk, zodat je een constructieve discussie kunt voeren.
### Concentreer u op de reis, niet op de bestemming
diff --git a/_articles/nl/legal.md b/_articles/nl/legal.md
index e6e35f7ede4..8e4c84d961d 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/legal.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/legal.md
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ For better or worse, consider letting them know even if it's a personal project.
* **Patents:** Is your company applying for a patent of which open sourcing your project would constitute [public disclosure](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_disclosure)? Sadly, you might be asked to wait (or maybe the company will reconsider the wisdom of the application). If you're expecting contributions to your project from employees of companies with large patent portfolios, your legal team may want you to use a license with an express patent grant from contributors (such as Apache 2.0 or GPLv3), or an additional contributor agreement (see above).
-* **Trademarks:** Double check that your project's name [does not conflict with any existing trademarks](../starting-a-project/#avoiding-name-conflicts). If you use your own company trademarks in the project, check that it does not cause any conflicts. [FOSSmarks](http://fossmarks.org/) is a practical guide to understanding trademarks in the context of free and open source projects.
+* **Trademarks:** Double check that your project's name [does not conflict with any existing trademarks](../starting-a-project/#naamconflicten-vermijden). If you use your own company trademarks in the project, check that it does not cause any conflicts. [FOSSmarks](http://fossmarks.org/) is a practical guide to understanding trademarks in the context of free and open source projects.
* **Privacy:** Does your project collect data on users? "Phone home" to company servers? Your legal team can help you comply with company policies and external regulations.
diff --git a/_articles/nl/starting-a-project.md b/_articles/nl/starting-a-project.md
index a52b65499d4..2fa10f93d1d 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/starting-a-project.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/starting-a-project.md
@@ -18,278 +18,290 @@ related:
## Het "wat" en "waarom" van open source
-So you're thinking about getting started with open source? Congratulations! The world appreciates your contribution. Let's talk about what open source is and why people do it.
+Dus je denkt erover om aan de slag te gaan met open source? Gefeliciteerd! De wereld waardeert uw bijdrage. Laten we het hebben over wat open source is en waarom mensen het doen.
-### What does "open source" mean?
+### Wat betekent "open source"?
-When a project is open source, that means **anybody is free to use, study, modify, and distribute your project for any purpose.** These permissions are enforced through [an open source license](https://opensource.org/licenses).
+Als een project open source is, betekent dit **dat iedereen vrij is om uw project voor elk doel te gebruiken, bestuderen, wijzigen en distribueren.** Deze machtigingen worden afgedwongen via [een open source-licentie](https://opensource.org/licenties).
-Open source is powerful because it lowers the barriers to adoption and collaboration, allowing people to spread and improve projects quickly. Also because it gives users a potential to control their own computing, relative to closed source. For example, a business using open source software has the option to hire someone to make custom improvements to the software, rather than relying exclusively on a closed source vendor's product decisions.
+Open source is krachtig omdat het de barrières voor acceptatie en samenwerking verlaagt, waardoor mensen projecten snel kunnen verspreiden en verbeteren. Ook omdat het gebruikers de mogelijkheid geeft om hun eigen computergebruik te beheersen, in vergelijking met closed source. Een bedrijf dat open source software gebruikt, heeft bijvoorbeeld de mogelijkheid om iemand in te huren om aangepaste verbeteringen aan de software aan te brengen, in plaats van uitsluitend te vertrouwen op de productbeslissingen van een closed source-leverancier.
-_Free software_ refers to the same set of projects as _open source_. Sometimes you'll also see [these terms](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_and_open-source_software) combined as "free and open source software" (FOSS) or "free, libre, and open source software" (FLOSS). _Free_ and _libre_ refer to freedom, [not price](#does-open-source-mean-free-of-charge).
+_Vrije software (Free software)_ verwijst naar dezelfde reeks projecten als _open source_. Soms zie je ook [deze termen](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_and_open-source_software) gecombineerd als "free en open source software" (FOSS) of "free, libre en open source software" (FLOSS). _Free_ en _libre_ verwijzen naar vrijheid, [niet de prijs](#betekend-open-source-gratis).
-### Why do people open source their work?
+### Waarom stellen mensen hun werk als open source beschikbaar?
- One of the most rewarding experiences I get out of using and collaborating on open source comes from the relationships that I build with other developers facing many of the same problems I am.
+ Een van de meest lonende ervaringen die ik krijg bij het gebruiken van en samenwerken aan open source, komt voort uit de relaties die ik opbouw met andere ontwikkelaars die met veel van dezelfde problemen worden geconfronteerd als ik.
+
+ _One of the most rewarding experiences I get out of using and collaborating on open source comes from the relationships that I build with other developers facing many of the same problems I am._
-— @kentcdodds, ["How getting into Open Source has been awesome for me"](https://kentcdodds.com/blog/how-getting-into-open-source-has-been-awesome-for-me)
+— @kentcdodds, ["Het was geweldig om in Open Source te komen"](https://kentcdodds.com/blog/how-getting-into-open-source-has-been-awesome-for-me)
-[There are many reasons](https://ben.balter.com/2015/11/23/why-open-source/) why a person or organization would want to open source a project. Some examples include:
+[Er zijn veel redenen](https://ben.balter.com/2015/11/23/why-open-source/) waarom een persoon of organisatie een project zou willen open source maken. Enkele voorbeelden zijn:
-* **Collaboration:** Open source projects can accept changes from anybody in the world. [Exercism](https://github.com/exercism/), for example, is a programming exercise platform with over 350 contributors.
+* **Samenwerking:** Open source-projecten kunnen wijzigingen van iedereen ter wereld accepteren. [Exercism](https://github.com/exercism/) is bijvoorbeeld een oefenplatform voor programmeren met meer dan 350 medewerkers.
-* **Adoption and remixing:** Open source projects can be used by anyone for nearly any purpose. People can even use it to build other things. [WordPress](https://github.com/WordPress), for example, started as a fork of an existing project called [b2](https://github.com/WordPress/book/blob/HEAD/Content/Part%201/2-b2-cafelog.md).
+* **Adoptie en remixen:** Open source-projecten kunnen door iedereen voor bijna elk doel worden gebruikt. Mensen kunnen er zelfs andere dingen mee bouwen. [WordPress](https://github.com/WordPress) is bijvoorbeeld begonnen als een splitsing van een bestaand project met de naam [b2](https://github.com/WordPress/book/blob/HEAD/Content/Part%201/2-b2-cafelog.md).
-* **Transparency:** Anyone can inspect an open source project for errors or inconsistencies. Transparency matters to governments like [Bulgaria](https://medium.com/@bozhobg/bulgaria-got-a-law-requiring-open-source-98bf626cf70a) or the [United States](https://sourcecode.cio.gov/), regulated industries like banking or healthcare, and security software like [Let's Encrypt](https://github.com/letsencrypt).
+* **Transparantie:** Iedereen kan een open source-project inspecteren op fouten of inconsistenties. Transparantie is belangrijk voor regeringen zoals [Bulgarije](https://medium.com/@bozhobg/bulgaria-got-a-law-requiring-open-source-98bf626cf70a) of de [Verenigde Staten](https://sourcecode.cio.gov/), gereguleerde industrieën zoals het bankwezen of de gezondheidszorg, en beveiligingssoftware zoals [Let's Encrypt](https://github.com/letsencrypt).
-Open source isn't just for software, either. You can open source everything from data sets to books. Check out [GitHub Explore](https://github.com/explore) for ideas on what else you can open source.
+Open source is niet alleen voor software. U kunt alles openen, van datasets tot boeken. Bekijk [GitHub Explore](https://github.com/explore) voor ideeën over wat je nog meer kunt open source.
-### Does open source mean "free of charge"?
+### Betekend open source gratis?
-One of open source's biggest draws is that it does not cost money. "Free of charge", however, is a byproduct of open source's overall value.
+Een van de grootste voordelen van open source is dat het geen geld kost. "Gratis" is echter een bijproduct van de totale waarde van open source.
-Because [an open source license requires](https://opensource.org/osd-annotated) that anyone can use, modify, and share your project for nearly any purpose, projects themselves tend to be free of charge. If the project cost money to use, anyone could legally make a copy and use the free version instead.
+Omdat [een open source-licentie vereist](https://opensource.org/osd-annotated) dat iedereen uw project voor bijna elk doel kan gebruiken, wijzigen en delen, zijn projecten zelf meestal gratis. Als het project geld kost om te gebruiken, kan iedereen legaal een kopie maken en in plaats daarvan de gratis versie gebruiken.
-As a result, most open source projects are free, but "free of charge" is not part of the open source definition. There are ways to charge for open source projects indirectly through dual licensing or limited features, while still complying with the official definition of open source.
+Als gevolg hiervan zijn de meeste open source-projecten gratis, maar 'gratis' maakt geen deel uit van de open source-definitie. Er zijn manieren om indirect kosten in rekening te brengen voor open source-projecten via dubbele licenties of beperkte functies, terwijl ze toch voldoen aan de officiële definitie van open source.
## Moet ik mijn eigen open source-project lanceren?
-The short answer is yes, because no matter the outcome, launching your own project is a great way to learn how open source works.
+Het korte antwoord is ja, want wat de uitkomst ook is, het starten van je eigen project is een geweldige manier om te leren hoe open source werkt.
-If you've never open sourced a project before, you might be nervous about what people will say, or whether anyone will notice at all. If this sounds like you, you're not alone!
+Als je nog nooit een project hebt geopend, ben je misschien zenuwachtig over wat mensen zullen zeggen, of dat iemand het überhaupt zal opmerken. Als dit klinkt zoals jij, ben je niet de enige!
-Open source work is like any other creative activity, whether it's writing or painting. It can feel scary to share your work with the world, but the only way to get better is to practice - even if you don't have an audience.
+Open source werken is net als elke andere creatieve activiteit, of het nu gaat om schrijven of schilderen. Het kan eng aanvoelen om je werk met de wereld te delen, maar de enige manier om beter te worden, is door te oefenen - zelfs als je geen publiek hebt.
-If you're not yet convinced, take a moment to think about what your goals might be.
+Als u nog niet overtuigd bent, neem dan even de tijd om na te denken over uw doelen.
-### Setting your goals
+### Je doelen stellen
-Goals can help you figure out what to work on, what to say no to, and where you need help from others. Start by asking yourself, _why am I open sourcing this project?_
+Doelen kunnen u helpen erachter te komen waaraan u moet werken, waar u nee tegen moet zeggen en waar u hulp van anderen nodig heeft. Begin met jezelf af te vragen: _waarom ben ik open source voor dit project?_
-There is no one right answer to this question. You may have multiple goals for a single project, or different projects with different goals.
+Er is geen goed antwoord op deze vraag. Mogelijk hebt u meerdere doelen voor een enkel project, of verschillende projecten met verschillende doelen.
-If your only goal is to show off your work, you may not even want contributions, and even say so in your README. On the other hand, if you do want contributors, you'll invest time into clear documentation and making newcomers feel welcome.
+Als het je enige doel is om met je werk te pronken, wil je misschien niet eens bijdragen, en dat zeg je zelfs in je README. Aan de andere kant, als u donateurs wilt, investeert u tijd in duidelijke documentatie en zorgt u ervoor dat nieuwkomers zich welkom voelen.
- At some point I created a custom UIAlertView that I was using...and I decided to make it open source. So I modified it to be more dynamic and uploaded it to GitHub. I also wrote my first documentation explaining to other developers how to use it on their projects. Probably nobody ever used it because it was a simple project but I was feeling good about my contribution.
+ Op een gegeven moment heb ik een aangepaste UIAlertView gemaakt die ik gebruikte ... en ik besloot het open source te maken. Dus ik heb het aangepast om het dynamischer te maken en het naar GitHub geüpload. Ik schreef ook mijn eerste documentatie waarin ik aan andere ontwikkelaars uitlegde hoe ze het voor hun projecten konden gebruiken. Waarschijnlijk heeft niemand het ooit gebruikt omdat het een eenvoudig project was, maar ik voelde me goed over mijn bijdrage.
+
+ _At some point I created a custom UIAlertView that I was using...and I decided to make it open source. So I modified it to be more dynamic and uploaded it to GitHub. I also wrote my first documentation explaining to other developers how to use it on their projects. Probably nobody ever used it because it was a simple project but I was feeling good about my contribution._
-— @mavris, ["Self-taught Software Developers: Why Open Source is important to us"](https://medium.com/rocknnull/self-taught-software-engineers-why-open-source-is-important-to-us-fe2a3473a576)
+— @mavris, ["Zelf onderwezen softwareontwikkelaars: waarom open source belangrijk voor ons is"](https://medium.com/rocknnull/self-taught-software-engineers-why-open-source-is-important-to-us-fe2a3473a576)
-As your project grows, your community may need more than just code from you. Responding to issues, reviewing code, and evangelizing your project are all important tasks in an open source project.
+Naarmate uw project groeit, heeft uw gemeenschap mogelijk meer nodig dan alleen code van u. Reageren op problemen, code herzien en uw project promoten, zijn allemaal belangrijke taken in een open source-project.
-While the amount of time you spend on non-coding tasks will depend on the size and scope of your project, you should be prepared as a maintainer to address them yourself or find someone to help you.
+Hoewel de hoeveelheid tijd die u aan niet-coderende taken besteedt, afhangt van de omvang en reikwijdte van uw project, moet u als onderhouder erop voorbereid zijn om ze zelf aan te pakken of iemand te zoeken om u te helpen.
-**If you're part of a company open sourcing a project,** make sure your project has the internal resources it needs to thrive. You'll want to identify who's responsible for maintaining the project after launch, and how you'll share those tasks with your community.
+**Als u deel uitmaakt van een bedrijf dat een project opent,** zorg ervoor dat uw project over de interne middelen beschikt die het nodig heeft om te gedijen. U wilt weten wie verantwoordelijk is voor het onderhoud van het project na de lancering, en hoe u die taken met uw community deelt.
-If you need a dedicated budget or staffing for promotion, operations and maintaining the project, start those conversations early.
+Als u een specifiek budget of personeel nodig heeft voor promotie, operaties en het onderhouden van het project, begin die gesprekken dan vroeg.
- As you begin to open source the project, it's important to make sure that your management processes take into consideration the contributions and abilities of the community around your project. Don't be afraid to involve contributors who are not employed in your business in key aspects of the project — especially if they are frequent contributors.
+ Als u begint met het openen van het project, is het belangrijk om ervoor te zorgen dat uw beheerprocessen rekening houden met de bijdragen en capaciteiten van de gemeenschap rond uw project. Wees niet bang om bijdragers die niet in uw bedrijf werkzaam zijn, te betrekken bij de belangrijkste aspecten van het project, vooral als ze regelmatig bijdragen.
+
+ _As you begin to open source the project, it's important to make sure that your management processes take into consideration the contributions and abilities of the community around your project. Don't be afraid to involve contributors who are not employed in your business in key aspects of the project — especially if they are frequent contributors._
-— @captainsafia, ["So you wanna open source a project, eh?"](https://dev.to/captainsafia/so-you-wanna-open-source-a-project-eh-5779)
+— @captainsafia, ["Dus je wilt een project openen, hè?"](https://dev.to/captainsafia/so-you-wanna-open-source-a-project-eh-5779)
-### Contributing to other projects
+### Bijdragen aan andere projecten
-If your goal is to learn how to collaborate with others or understand how open source works, consider contributing to an existing project. Start with a project that you already use and love. Contributing to a project can be as simple as fixing typos or updating documentation.
+Als het uw doel is om te leren samenwerken met anderen of om te begrijpen hoe open source werkt, overweeg dan om bij te dragen aan een bestaand project. Begin met een project dat je al gebruikt en waar je van houdt. Bijdragen aan een project kan zo simpel zijn als het corrigeren van typefouten of het bijwerken van documentatie.
-If you're not sure how to get started as a contributor, check out our [How to Contribute to Open Source guide](../how-to-contribute/).
+Als u niet zeker weet hoe u als bijdrager aan de slag kunt gaan, bekijk dan onze [Hoe u kunt bijdragen aan Open Source-gids](../how-to-contribute/).
## Uw eigen open source-project lanceren
-There is no perfect time to open source your work. You can open source an idea, a work in progress, or after years of being closed source.
+Er is geen perfect moment om uw werk open source te maken. U kunt een idee openen, een werk in uitvoering of na jarenlang closed source te zijn geweest.
-Generally speaking, you should open source your project when you feel comfortable having others view, and give feedback on, your work.
+Over het algemeen moet u uw project openen als u zich op uw gemak voelt als anderen uw werk bekijken en er feedback op geven.
-No matter which stage you decide to open source your project, every project should include the following documentation:
+Ongeacht in welke fase u besluit uw project te openen, elk project moet de volgende documentatie bevatten:
-* [Open source license](https://help.github.com/articles/open-source-licensing/#where-does-the-license-live-on-my-repository)
+* [Open source-licentie](https://help.github.com/articles/open-source-licensing/#where-does-the-license-live-on-my-repository)
* [README](https://help.github.com/articles/create-a-repo/#commit-your-first-change)
-* [Contributing guidelines](https://help.github.com/articles/setting-guidelines-for-repository-contributors/)
-* [Code of conduct](../code-of-conduct/)
+* [Richtlijnen voor het bijdragen](https://help.github.com/articles/setting-guidelines-for-repository-contributors/)
+* [Gedragscode](../code-of-conduct/)
-As a maintainer, these components will help you communicate expectations, manage contributions, and protect everyone's legal rights (including your own). They significantly increase your chances of having a positive experience.
+Als open source-onderhouder helpen deze componenten u bij het communiceren van verwachtingen, het beheren van bijdragen en het beschermen van ieders wettelijke rechten (inclusief die van uzelf). Ze vergroten uw kansen op een positieve ervaring aanzienlijk.
-If your project is on GitHub, putting these files in your root directory with the recommended filenames will help GitHub recognize and automatically surface them to your readers.
+Als je project op GitHub staat, zal het plaatsen van deze bestanden in je root-directory met de aanbevolen bestandsnamen GitHub helpen ze te herkennen en automatisch aan je lezers te laten zien.
-### Choosing a license
+### Een licentie kiezen
-An open source license guarantees that others can use, copy, modify, and contribute back to your project without repercussions. It also protects you from sticky legal situations. **You must include a license when you launch an open source project.**
+Een open source-licentie garandeert dat anderen uw project zonder repercussies kunnen gebruiken, kopiëren, wijzigen en eraan kunnen bijdragen. Het beschermt je ook tegen plakkerige juridische situaties. **U moet een licentie toevoegen wanneer u een open source-project start.**
-Legal work is no fun. The good news is that you can copy and paste an existing license into your repository. It will only take a minute to protect your hard work.
+Juridisch werk is niet leuk. Het goede nieuws is dat u een bestaande licentie kunt kopiëren en in uw repository kunt plakken. Het duurt maar een minuut om uw harde werk te beschermen.
-[MIT](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/), [Apache 2.0](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/), and [GPLv3](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/gpl-3.0/) are the most popular open source licenses, but [there are other options](https://choosealicense.com) to choose from.
+[MIT](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/), [Apache 2.0](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/) en [GPLv3](https://choicealicense.com/licenses/gpl-3.0/) zijn de meest populaire open source licenties, maar [er zijn andere opties](https://choosealicense.com) om uit te kiezen.
-When you create a new project on GitHub, you are given the option to select a license. Including an open source license will make your GitHub project open source.
+Wanneer u een nieuw project op GitHub maakt, krijgt u de mogelijkheid om een licentie te selecteren. Als u een open source-licentie opneemt, wordt uw GitHub-project open source.
-![Pick a license](/assets/images/starting-a-project/repository-license-picker.png)
+![Kies een licentie](/assets/images/starting-a-project/repository-license-picker.png)
-If you have other questions or concerns around the legal aspects of managing an open source project, [we've got you covered](../legal/).
+Als u andere vragen of opmerkingen heeft over de juridische aspecten van het beheren van een open source-project, [wij hebben u gedekt](../legal/).
-### Writing a README
+### Een README schrijven
-READMEs do more than explain how to use your project. They also explain why your project matters, and what your users can do with it.
+README's doen meer dan alleen uitleggen hoe u uw project kunt gebruiken. Ze leggen ook uit waarom uw project ertoe doet en wat uw gebruikers ermee kunnen doen.
-In your README, try to answer the following questions:
+Probeer in je README de volgende vragen te beantwoorden:
-* What does this project do?
-* Why is this project useful?
-* How do I get started?
-* Where can I get more help, if I need it?
+* Wat doet dit project?
+* Waarom is dit project nuttig?
+* Hoe begin ik eraan?
+* Waar kan ik meer hulp krijgen als ik die nodig heb?
-You can use your README to answer other questions, like how you handle contributions, what the goals of the project are, and information about licenses and attribution. If you don't want to accept contributions, or your project is not yet ready for production, write this information down.
+U kunt uw README gebruiken om andere vragen te beantwoorden, zoals hoe u omgaat met bijdragen, wat de doelen van het project zijn en informatie over licenties en attributie. Als u geen bijdragen wilt accepteren, of uw project is nog niet klaar voor productie, schrijf deze informatie dan op.
- Better documentation means more users, less support requests, and more contributors. (...) Remember that your readers aren't you. There are people who might come to a project who have completely different experiences.
+ Betere documentatie betekent meer gebruikers, minder ondersteuningsverzoeken en meer bijdragers. (...) Onthoud dat u niet uw lezers bent. Er zijn mensen die misschien naar een project komen die totaal andere ervaringen hebben.
+
+ _Better documentation means more users, less support requests, and more contributors. (...) Remember that your readers aren't you. There are people who might come to a project who have completely different experiences._
-— @tracymakes, ["Writing So Your Words Are Read (video)"](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LiV759Bje0&list=PLmV2D6sIiX3U03qc-FPXgLFGFkccCEtfv&index=10)
+— @tracymakes, ["Schrijven zodat uw woorden worden gelezen (video)"](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LiV759Bje0&list=PLmV2D6sIiX3U03qc-FPXgLFGFkccCEtfv&index=10)
-Sometimes, people avoid writing a README because they feel like the project is unfinished, or they don't want contributions. These are all very good reasons to write one.
+Soms vermijden mensen het schrijven van een README omdat ze het gevoel hebben dat het project niet af is, of omdat ze geen bijdragen willen. Dit zijn allemaal hele goede redenen om er een te schrijven.
-For more inspiration, try using @dguo's ["Make a README" guide](https://www.makeareadme.com/) or @PurpleBooth's [README template](https://gist.github.com/PurpleBooth/109311bb0361f32d87a2) to write a complete README.
+Voor meer inspiratie, probeer @dguo's ["Maak een README"-gids](https://www.makeareadme.com/) of @PurpleBooth's [README-sjabloon](https://gist.github.com/PurpleBooth/109311bb0361f32d87a2) om een volledige README te schrijven.
-When you include a README file in the root directory, GitHub will automatically display it on the repository homepage.
+Als je een README-bestand opneemt in de root-directory, zal GitHub het automatisch op de startpagina van de repository weergeven.
-### Writing your contributing guidelines
+### Schrijven van uw bijdrage richtlijnen
-A CONTRIBUTING file tells your audience how to participate in your project. For example, you might include information on:
+Een CONTRIBUTING-bestand vertelt uw publiek hoe ze aan uw project kunnen deelnemen. U kunt bijvoorbeeld informatie opnemen over:
-* How to file a bug report (try using [issue and pull request templates](https://github.com/blog/2111-issue-and-pull-request-templates))
-* How to suggest a new feature
-* How to set up your environment and run tests
+* Hoe een bugrapport in te dienen (probeer [sjablonen voor issue en pull-verzoeken](https://github.com/blog/2111-issue-and-pull-request-templates) te gebruiken)
+* Hoe u een nieuwe functie kunt voorstellen
+* Hoe u uw omgeving instelt en tests uitvoert
-In addition to technical details, a CONTRIBUTING file is an opportunity to communicate your expectations for contributions, such as:
+Naast technische details is een CONTRIBUTING-bestand een gelegenheid om uw verwachtingen voor bijdragen te communiceren, zoals:
-* The types of contributions you're looking for
-* Your roadmap or vision for the project
-* How contributors should (or should not) get in touch with you
+* De soorten bijdragen die u zoekt
+* Uw roadmap of visie voor het project
+* Hoe bijdragers wel of niet contact met u moeten opnemen
-Using a warm, friendly tone and offering specific suggestions for contributions (such as writing documentation, or making a website) can go a long way in making newcomers feel welcomed and excited to participate.
+Het gebruik van een warme, vriendelijke toon en het aanbieden van specifieke suggesties voor bijdragen (zoals het schrijven van documentatie of het maken van een website) kan ertoe bijdragen dat nieuwkomers zich welkom en enthousiast voelen om deel te nemen.
-For example, [Active Admin](https://github.com/activeadmin/activeadmin/) starts [its contributing guide](https://github.com/activeadmin/activeadmin/blob/HEAD/CONTRIBUTING.md) with:
+Bijvoorbeeld: [Active Admin](https://github.com/activeadmin/activeadmin/) start [zijn bijdragende gids](https://github.com/activeadmin/activeadmin/blob/HEAD/CONTRIBUTING.md) met:
-> First off, thank you for considering contributing to Active Admin. It's people like you that make Active Admin such a great tool.
+> Allereerst bedankt dat u overweegt om bij te dragen aan Active Admin. Het zijn mensen zoals jij die Active Admin tot zo'n geweldig hulpmiddel maken.
-In the earliest stages of your project, your CONTRIBUTING file can be simple. You should always explain how to report bugs or file issues, and any technical requirements (like tests) to make a contribution.
+In de vroegste stadia van uw project kan uw CONTRIBUTING-bestand eenvoudig zijn. U moet altijd uitleggen hoe u bugs of problemen met bestanden meldt, en welke technische vereisten (zoals tests) u heeft om een bijdrage te leveren.
-Over time, you might add other frequently asked questions to your CONTRIBUTING file. Writing down this information means fewer people will ask you the same questions over and over again.
+Na verloop van tijd kunt u andere veelgestelde vragen aan uw CONTRIBUTING-bestand toevoegen. Als u deze informatie opschrijft, zullen minder mensen u keer op keer dezelfde vragen stellen.
-For more help with writing your CONTRIBUTING file, check out @nayafia's [contributing guide template](https://github.com/nayafia/contributing-template/blob/HEAD/CONTRIBUTING-template.md) or @mozilla's ["How to Build a CONTRIBUTING.md"](https://mozillascience.github.io/working-open-workshop/contributing/).
+Voor meer hulp bij het schrijven van je CONTRIBUTING-bestand, ga je naar @nayafia's [sjabloon voor bijdrage gids](https://github.com/nayafia/contributing-template/blob/HEAD/CONTRIBUTING-template.md) of @mozilla's ["Bouw een CONTRIBUTING.md workshop"](https://mozillascience.github.io/working-open-workshop/contributing/).
-Link to your CONTRIBUTING file from your README, so more people see it. If you [place the CONTRIBUTING file in your project's repository](https://help.github.com/articles/setting-guidelines-for-repository-contributors/), GitHub will automatically link to your file when a contributor creates an issue or opens a pull request.
+Link naar uw BIJDRAGEN-bestand vanuit uw README, zodat meer mensen het kunnen zien. Als je [het CONTRIBUTING-bestand in de repository van je project plaatst](https://help.github.com/articles/setting-guidelines-for-repository-contributors/), zal GitHub automatisch naar je bestand linken wanneer een bijdrager een issue maakt of opent een pull-verzoek.
![Contributing guidelines](/assets/images/starting-a-project/Contributing-guidelines.jpg)
-### Establishing a code of conduct
+### Opstellen van een gedragscode
- We’ve all had experiences where we faced what was probably abuse either as a maintainer trying to explain why something had to be a certain way, or as a user...asking a simple question. (...) A code of conduct becomes an easily referenced and linkable document that indicates that your team takes constructive discourse very seriously.
+ We hebben allemaal ervaringen gehad waarbij we te maken kregen met wat waarschijnlijk misbruik was, hetzij als onderhouder die probeerde uit te leggen waarom iets op een bepaalde manier moest zijn, of als gebruiker ... die een simpele vraag stelde. (...) Een gedragscode wordt een gemakkelijk te raadplegen en koppelbaar document dat aangeeft dat uw team constructief discours zeer serieus neemt.
+
+ _We’ve all had experiences where we faced what was probably abuse either as a maintainer trying to explain why something had to be a certain way, or as a user...asking a simple question. (...) A code of conduct becomes an easily referenced and linkable document that indicates that your team takes constructive discourse very seriously._
-— @mlynch, ["Making Open Source a Happier Place"](https://medium.com/ionic-and-the-mobile-web/making-open-source-a-happier-place-3b90d254f5f)
+— @mlynch, ["Open Source een gelukkiger plek maken"](https://medium.com/ionic-and-the-mobile-web/making-open-source-a-happier-place-3b90d254f5f)
-Finally, a code of conduct helps set ground rules for behavior for your project's participants. This is especially valuable if you're launching an open source project for a community or company. A code of conduct empowers you to facilitate healthy, constructive community behavior, which will reduce your stress as a maintainer.
+Ten slotte helpt een gedragscode om basisregels vast te stellen voor het gedrag van de deelnemers aan uw project. Dit is vooral waardevol als u een open source-project start voor een gemeenschap of bedrijf. Een gedragscode stelt je in staat om gezond, constructief gemeenschapsgedrag te faciliteren, wat je stress als onderhouder zal verminderen.
-For more information, check out our [Code of Conduct guide](../code-of-conduct/).
+Raadpleeg voor meer informatie onze [Gedragscode-gids](../code-of-conduct/).
-In addition to communicating _how_ you expect participants to behave, a code of conduct also tends to describe who these expectations apply to, when they apply, and what to do if a violation occurs.
+Naast het communiceren van _hoe_ je verwacht dat deelnemers zich gedragen, beschrijft een gedragscode ook vaak op wie deze verwachtingen van toepassing zijn, wanneer ze van toepassing zijn en wat te doen bij een overtreding.
-Much like open source licenses, there are also emerging standards for codes of conduct, so you don't have to write your own. The [Contributor Covenant](https://contributor-covenant.org/) is a drop-in code of conduct that is used by [over 40,000 open source projects](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/adopters), including Kubernetes, Rails, and Swift. No matter which text you use, you should be prepared to enforce your code of conduct when necessary.
+Net als bij open source-licenties, zijn er ook nieuwe normen voor gedragscodes, zodat u deze niet zelf hoeft te schrijven. De [Bijdrager Covenant](https://contributor-covenant.org/) is een drop-in gedragscode die wordt gebruikt door [meer dan 40.000 open source-projecten](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/adopters), inclusief Kubernetes, Rails en Swift. Welke tekst u ook gebruikt, u moet bereid zijn om uw gedragscode waar nodig af te dwingen.
-Paste the text directly into a CODE_OF_CONDUCT file in your repository. Keep the file in your project's root directory so it's easy to find, and link to it from your README.
+Plak de tekst rechtstreeks in een CODE_OF_CONDUCT-bestand in uw repository. Bewaar het bestand in de root-directory van je project zodat het gemakkelijk te vinden is, en link ernaar vanuit je README.
## Geef uw project een naam en branding
-Branding is more than a flashy logo or catchy project name. It's about how you talk about your project, and who you reach with your message.
+Branding is meer dan een flitsend logo of pakkende projectnaam. Het gaat erom hoe u over uw project praat en wie u bereikt met uw bericht.
-### Choosing the right name
+### De juiste naam kiezen
-Pick a name that is easy to remember and, ideally, gives some idea of what the project does. For example:
+Kies een naam die gemakkelijk te onthouden is en idealiter een idee geeft van wat het project doet. Bijvoorbeeld:
-* [Sentry](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry) monitors apps for crash reporting
-* [Thin](https://github.com/macournoyer/thin) is a fast and simple Ruby web server
+* [Sentry](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry) controleert apps op crashrapportage
+* [Thin](https://github.com/macournoyer/thin) is een snelle en eenvoudige Ruby-webserver
-If you're building upon an existing project, using their name as a prefix can help clarify what your project does (for example, [node-fetch](https://github.com/bitinn/node-fetch) brings `window.fetch` to Node.js).
+Als u voortbouwt op een bestaand project, kan het gebruik van hun naam als voorvoegsel helpen verduidelijken wat uw project doet (bijvoorbeeld [node-fetch](https://github.com/bitinn/node-fetch) brengt `window.fetch` naar Node.js).
-Consider clarity above all. Puns are fun, but remember that some jokes might not translate to other cultures or people with different experiences from you. Some of your potential users might be company employees: you don't want to make them uncomfortable when they have to explain your project at work!
+Overweeg vooral duidelijkheid. Woordspelingen zijn leuk, maar onthoud dat sommige grappen mogelijk niet vertalen naar andere culturen of mensen met andere ervaringen dan jij. Sommige van uw potentiële gebruikers kunnen werknemers van het bedrijf zijn: u wilt ze niet ongemakkelijk maken als ze uw project op het werk moeten uitleggen!
-### Avoiding name conflicts
+### Naamconflicten vermijden
-[Check for open source projects with a similar name](http://ivantomic.com/projects/ospnc/), especially if you share the same language or ecosystem. If your name overlaps with a popular existing project, you might confuse your audience.
+[Controleer op open source-projecten met een vergelijkbare naam](http://ivantomic.com/projects/ospnc/), vooral als je dezelfde taal of hetzelfde ecosysteem deelt. Als uw naam overlapt met een populair bestaand project, kunt u uw publiek in verwarring brengen.
-If you want a website, Twitter handle, or other properties to represent your project, make sure you can get the names you want. Ideally, [reserve those names now](https://instantdomainsearch.com/) for peace of mind, even if you don't intend to use them just yet.
+Als u wilt dat een website, Twitter-handle of andere eigenschappen uw project vertegenwoordigen, zorg er dan voor dat u de gewenste namen krijgt. Idealiter [reserveer deze namen nu](https://instantdomainsearch.com/) voor gemoedsrust, zelfs als u ze nog niet wilt gebruiken.
-Make sure that your project's name doesn't infringe upon any trademarks. A company might ask you to take down your project later on, or even take legal action against you. It's just not worth the risk.
+Zorg ervoor dat de naam van uw project geen inbreuk maakt op handelsmerken. Een bedrijf kan u vragen om uw project later stop te zetten, of zelfs juridische stappen tegen u ondernemen. Het is het risico gewoon niet waard.
-You can check the [WIPO Global Brand Database](http://www.wipo.int/branddb/en/) for trademark conflicts. If you're at a company, this is one of the things your [legal team can help you with](../legal/).
+U kunt de [WIPO Global Brand Database](http://www.wipo.int/branddb/en/) raadplegen voor handelsmerkconflicten. Als u bij een bedrijf werkt, is dit een van de dingen waarmee uw [juridische team u kan helpen](../legal/).
-Finally, do a quick Google search for your project name. Will people be able to easily find your project? Does something else appear in the search results that you wouldn't want them to see?
+Voer tot slot een snelle Google-zoekopdracht uit naar uw projectnaam. Zullen mensen uw project gemakkelijk kunnen vinden? Verschijnt er iets anders in de zoekresultaten waarvan u niet wilt dat ze het zien?
-### How you write (and code) affects your brand, too!
+### Hoe u schrijft (en codeert), heeft ook invloed op uw merk!
-Throughout the life of your project, you'll do a lot of writing: READMEs, tutorials, community documents, responding to issues, maybe even newsletters and mailing lists.
+Gedurende de levensduur van uw project zult u veel schrijven: README's, tutorials, gemeenschapsdocumenten, reageren op problemen, misschien zelfs nieuwsbrieven en mailinglijsten.
-Whether it's official documentation or a casual email, your writing style is part of your project's brand. Consider how you might come across to your audience and whether that is the tone you wish to convey.
+Of het nu gaat om officiële documentatie of een informele e-mail, uw schrijfstijl maakt deel uit van het merk van uw project. Bedenk hoe u op uw publiek zou kunnen overkomen en of dat de toon is die u wilt overbrengen.
- I tried to be involved with every thread on the mailing list, and showing exemplary behaviour, being nice to people, taking their issues seriously and trying to be helpful overall. After a while, people stuck around not to only ask questions, but to help with the answering as well, and to my complete delight, they mimicked my style.
+ Ik probeerde betrokken te zijn bij elke thread op de mailinglijst en voorbeeldig gedrag te tonen, aardig te zijn tegen mensen, hun problemen serieus te nemen en in het algemeen behulpzaam te zijn. Na een tijdje bleven mensen rondhangen om niet alleen vragen te stellen, maar ook om te helpen met het beantwoorden, en tot mijn grote vreugde bootsten ze mijn stijl na.
+
+ _I tried to be involved with every thread on the mailing list, and showing exemplary behaviour, being nice to people, taking their issues seriously and trying to be helpful overall. After a while, people stuck around not to only ask questions, but to help with the answering as well, and to my complete delight, they mimicked my style._
-— @janl on [CouchDB](https://github.com/apache/couchdb), ["Sustainable Open Source"](https://writing.jan.io/2015/11/20/sustainable-open-source.html)
+— @janl op [CouchDB](https://github.com/apache/couchdb), ["Duurzaam open source"](https://writing.jan.io/2015/11/20/sustainable-open-source.html)
-Using warm, inclusive language (such as "them", even when referring to the single person) can go a long way in making your project feel welcoming to new contributors. Stick to simple language, as many of your readers may not be native English speakers.
+Het gebruik van warme, inclusieve taal (zoals 'zij', zelfs als je naar de enige persoon verwijst), kan er voor zorgen dat je project een welkom gevoel krijgt bij nieuwe bijdragers. Blijf bij eenvoudige taal, aangezien veel van uw lezers mogelijk geen moedertaalsprekers Engels zijn.
-Beyond how you write words, your coding style may also become part of your project's brand. [Angular](https://angular.io/guide/styleguide) and [jQuery](https://contribute.jquery.org/style-guide/js/) are two examples of projects with rigorous coding styles and guidelines.
+Naast hoe u woorden schrijft, kan uw codeerstijl ook onderdeel worden van het merk van uw project. [Angular](https://angular.io/guide/styleguide) en [jQuery](https://contribute.jquery.org/style-guide/js/) zijn twee voorbeelden van projecten met rigoureuze coderingsstijlen en richtlijnen.
-It isn't necessary to write a style guide for your project when you're just starting out, and you may find that you enjoy incorporating different coding styles into your project anyway. But you should anticipate how your writing and coding style might attract or discourage different types of people. The earliest stages of your project are your opportunity to set the precedent you wish to see.
+Het is niet nodig om een stijlgids voor je project te schrijven als je net begint, en het kan zijn dat je het toch leuk vindt om verschillende codeerstijlen in je project op te nemen. Maar u moet anticiperen op hoe uw schrijf- en coderingsstijl verschillende soorten mensen zou kunnen aantrekken of ontmoedigen. De vroegste stadia van uw project zijn uw kans om het precedent te scheppen dat u wenst te zien.
## Uw checklist vóór de lancering
-Ready to open source your project? Here's a checklist to help. Check all the boxes? You're ready to go! [Click "publish"](https://help.github.com/articles/making-a-private-repository-public/) and pat yourself on the back.
+Klaar om uw project te openen? Hier is een checklist om te helpen. Alle vakjes aanvinken? Je bent klaar om te gaan! [Klik op "publiceren"](https://help.github.com/articles/making-a-private-repository-public/) en geef jezelf een schouderklopje.
-**Documentation**
+**Documentatie**
- Project has a LICENSE file with an open source license
+ Project heeft een LICENSE-bestand met een open source-licentie
- Project has basic documentation (README, CONTRIBUTING, CODE_OF_CONDUCT)
+ Project heeft basisdocumentatie (README, CONTRIBUTING, CODE_OF_CONDUCT)
- The name is easy to remember, gives some idea of what the project does, and does not conflict with an existing project or infringe on trademarks
+ De naam is gemakkelijk te onthouden, geeft een idee van wat het project doet en is niet in strijd met een bestaand project of inbreuk op handelsmerken
- The issue queue is up-to-date, with issues clearly organized and labeled
+ De issue wachtrij is up-to-date, met issues duidelijk geordend en gelabeld
@@ -298,55 +310,55 @@ Ready to open source your project? Here's a checklist to help. Check all the box
- Project uses consistent code conventions and clear function/method/variable names
+ Project gebruikt consistente codeconventies en duidelijke functie/methode/variabelenamen
- The code is clearly commented, documenting intentions and edge cases
+ De code is duidelijk becommentarieerd en documenteert intenties en randgevallen
- There are no sensitive materials in the revision history, issues, or pull requests (for example, passwords or other non-public information)
+ Er zijn geen gevoelige materialen in de revisiegeschiedenis, problemen of pull-verzoeken (bijvoorbeeld wachtwoorden of andere niet-openbare informatie)
-**People**
+**Mensen**
-If you're an individual:
+Als je een individu bent:
- You've talked to the legal department and/or understand the IP and open source policies of your company (if you're an employee somewhere)
+ Je hebt met de juridische afdeling gesproken en/of je begrijpt het IP/IE en open source-beleid van je bedrijf (als je ergens een werknemer bent)
-If you're a company or organization:
+Als u een bedrijf of organisatie bent:
- You've talked to your legal department
+ U heeft met uw juridische afdeling gesproken
- You have a marketing plan for announcing and promoting the project
+ Je hebt een marketingplan om het project aan te kondigen en te promoten
- Someone is committed to managing community interactions (responding to issues, reviewing and merging pull requests)
+ Iemand zet zich in voor het beheren van community-interacties (reageren op problemen, beoordelen en samenvoegen van pull-verzoeken)
From 75d6f45fd5cf2c0422649ec1d333d8133bfd7774 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley de Groot
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 16:39:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 071/749] Article 'Leadership and Governance'
---
_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md | 117 ++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md b/_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md
index b63e1d92aff..cfc12b71160 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/leadership-and-governance.md
@@ -21,39 +21,43 @@ related:
## Inzicht in governance voor uw groeiende project
-Your project is growing, people are engaged, and you're committed to keeping this thing going. At this stage, you may be wondering how to incorporate regular project contributors into your workflow, whether it's giving someone commit access or resolving community debates. If you have questions, we've got answers.
+Je project groeit, mensen zijn betrokken en je bent vastbesloten om dit ding gaande te houden. In dit stadium vraagt u zich misschien af hoe u regelmatige projectmedewerkers in uw workflow kunt opnemen, of het nu gaat om iemand commit-toegang te geven of om discussies in de gemeenschap op te lossen. Als u vragen heeft, hebben we de antwoorden.
## Wat zijn voorbeelden van formele rollen die worden gebruikt in open source-projecten?
-Many projects follow a similar structure for contributor roles and recognition.
+Veel projecten volgen een vergelijkbare structuur voor rollen en erkenning van medewerkers.
-What these roles actually mean, though, is entirely up to you. Here are a few types of roles you may recognize:
+Wat deze rollen eigenlijk betekenen, is geheel aan jou. Hier zijn een paar soorten rollen die u wellicht herkent:
-* **Maintainer**
-* **Contributor**
+* **Open source-beheerder / Maintainer**
+* **Bijdrager / Contributor**
* **Committer**
-**For some projects, "maintainers"** are the only people in a project with commit access. In other projects, they're simply the people who are listed in the README as maintainers.
+**Voor sommige projecten zijn "open source-beheerders"** de enige mensen in een project met commit-toegang. In andere projecten zijn het gewoon de mensen die in de README worden vermeld als beheerders.
-A maintainer doesn't necessarily have to be someone who writes code for your project. It could be someone who's done a lot of work evangelizing your project, or written documentation that made the project more accessible to others. Regardless of what they do day-to-day, a maintainer is probably someone who feels responsibility over the direction of the project and is committed to improving it.
+Een onderhouder hoeft niet per se iemand te zijn die code voor uw project schrijft. Het kan iemand zijn die veel werk heeft verzet om uw project te evangeliseren, of schriftelijke documentatie die het project toegankelijker heeft gemaakt voor anderen. Ongeacht wat ze van dag tot dag doen, een onderhouder is waarschijnlijk iemand die verantwoordelijkheid voelt over de richting van het project en zich inzet om het te verbeteren.
-**A "contributor" could be anyone** who comments on an issue or pull request, people who add value to the project (whether it's triaging issues, writing code, or organizing events), or anybody with a merged pull request (perhaps the narrowest definition of a contributor).
+**Een 'bijdrager' kan iedereen zijn** die opmerkingen maakt over een probleem of pull-verzoek, mensen die waarde toevoegen aan het project (of het nu gaat om triaging-problemen, het schrijven van code of het organiseren van evenementen), of iemand met een samengevoegd pull-verzoek (misschien de engste definitie van een bijdrager).
- \[For Node.js,\] every person who shows up to comment on an issue or submit code is a member of a project’s community. Just being able to see them means that they have crossed the line from being a user to being a contributor.
+ \[Voor Node.js\] is elke persoon die komt opdagen om commentaar te geven op een probleem of code in te dienen, lid van de community van een project. Alleen al om ze te kunnen zien, betekent dat ze de grens hebben overschreden van een gebruiker naar een bijdrager.
+
+ _\[For Node.js,\] every person who shows up to comment on an issue or submit code is a member of a project’s community. Just being able to see them means that they have crossed the line from being a user to being a contributor._
-— @mikeal, ["Healthy Open Source"](https://medium.com/the-javascript-collection/healthy-open-source-967fa8be7951)
+— @mikeal, ["Gezond Open Source"](https://medium.com/the-javascript-collection/healthy-open-source-967fa8be7951)
-**The term "committer"** might be used to distinguish commit access, which is a specific type of responsibility, from other forms of contribution.
+**De term "committer"** kan worden gebruikt om commit-toegang, wat een specifiek type verantwoordelijkheid is, te onderscheiden van andere vormen van bijdrage.
-While you can define your project roles any way you'd like, [consider using broader definitions](../how-to-contribute/#waarom-bijdragen-aan-open-source) to encourage more forms of contribution. You can use leadership roles to formally recognize people who have made outstanding contributions to your project, regardless of their technical skill.
+Hoewel u uw projectrollen op elke gewenste manier kunt definiëren, [overweeg het gebruik van bredere definities](../how-to-contribute/#waarom-bijdragen-aan-open-source) om meer vormen van bijdrage aan te moedigen. U kunt leiderschapsrollen gebruiken om formeel mensen te erkennen die een uitstekende bijdrage aan uw project hebben geleverd, ongeacht hun technische vaardigheden.
- You might know me as the "inventor" of Django...but really I'm the guy who got hired to work on a thing a year after it was already made. (...) People suspect that I'm successful because of my programming skill...but I'm at best an average programmer.
+ Je kent me misschien als de "uitvinder" van Django... maar eigenlijk ben ik de man die werd aangenomen om aan iets te werken een jaar nadat het al gemaakt was. (...) Mensen vermoeden dat ik succesvol ben vanwege mijn programmeervaardigheid... maar ik ben op zijn best een gemiddelde programmeur.
+
+ _You might know me as the "inventor" of Django...but really I'm the guy who got hired to work on a thing a year after it was already made. (...) People suspect that I'm successful because of my programming skill...but I'm at best an average programmer._
— @jacobian, ["PyCon 2015 Keynote" (video)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIJdFxYlEKE#t=5m0s)
@@ -61,40 +65,44 @@ While you can define your project roles any way you'd like, [consider using broa
## Hoe formaliseer ik deze leiderschapsrollen?
-Formalizing your leadership roles helps people feel ownership and tells other community members who to look to for help.
+Het formaliseren van uw leiderschapsrollen helpt mensen zich eigenaar te voelen en vertelt andere gemeenschapsleden naar wie ze moeten zoeken voor hulp.
-For a smaller project, designating leaders can be as simple as adding their names to your README or a CONTRIBUTORS text file.
+Voor een kleiner project kan het aanwijzen van leiders net zo eenvoudig zijn als het toevoegen van hun naam aan uw README of een CONTRIBUTORS tekstbestand.
-For a bigger project, if you have a website, create a team page or list your project leaders there. For example, [Postgres](https://github.com/postgres/postgres/) has a [comprehensive team page](https://www.postgresql.org/community/contributors/) with short profiles for each contributor.
+Voor een groter project, als u een website heeft, maak dan een teampagina aan of vermeld uw projectleiders daar. [Postgres](https://github.com/postgres/postgres/) heeft bijvoorbeeld een [uitgebreide teampagina](https://www.postgresql.org/community/contributors/) met korte profielen voor elke bijdrager.
-If your project has a very active contributor community, you might form a "core team" of maintainers, or even subcommittees of people who take ownership of different issue areas (for example, security, issue triaging, or community conduct). Let people self-organize and volunteer for the roles they're most excited about, rather than assigning them.
+Als uw project een zeer actieve bijdragersgemeenschap heeft, kunt u een "kernteam" van beheerders vormen, of zelfs subcommissies van mensen die de verantwoordelijkheid nemen voor verschillende probleemgebieden (bijvoorbeeld beveiliging, probleemopsporing of gedrag van de gemeenschap). Laat mensen zichzelf organiseren en vrijwilligerswerk doen voor de rollen waar ze het meest enthousiast over zijn, in plaats van ze toe te wijzen.
- \[We\] supplement the core team with several "subteams". Each subteam is focused on a specific area, e.g., language design or libraries. (...) To ensure global coordination and a strong, coherent vision for the project as a whole, each subteam is led by a member of the core team.
+ \[We\] vullen het kernteam aan met verschillende "subteams". Elk subteam is gericht op een specifiek gebied, bijvoorbeeld taalontwerp of bibliotheken. (...) Om wereldwijde coördinatie en een sterke, samenhangende visie voor het project als geheel te verzekeren, wordt elk subteam geleid door een lid van het kernteam.
+
+ _\[We\] supplement the core team with several "subteams". Each subteam is focused on a specific area, e.g., language design or libraries. (...) To ensure global coordination and a strong, coherent vision for the project as a whole, each subteam is led by a member of the core team._
-— ["Rust Governance RFC"](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/HEAD/text/1068-rust-governance.md)
+— ["Rust Bestuur RFC"](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/HEAD/text/1068-rust-governance.md)
-Leadership teams may want to create a designated channel (like on IRC) or meet regularly to discuss the project (like on Gitter or Google Hangout). You can even make those meetings public so other people can listen. [Cucumber-ruby](https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber-ruby), for example, [hosts office hours every week](https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber-ruby/blob/HEAD/CONTRIBUTING.md#talking-with-other-devs).
+Leiderschapsteams willen misschien een aangewezen kanaal creëren (zoals op IRC) of regelmatig bijeenkomen om het project te bespreken (zoals op Gitter of Google Hangout). U kunt die bijeenkomsten zelfs openbaar maken, zodat andere mensen kunnen luisteren. [Cucumber-ruby](https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber-ruby), bijvoorbeeld [host wekelijks kantooruren](https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber-ruby/blob/HEAD/CONTRIBUTING.md#talking-with-other-devs).
-Once you've established leadership roles, don't forget to document how people can attain them! Establish a clear process for how someone can become a maintainer or join a subcommittee in your project, and write it into your GOVERNANCE.md.
+Als u eenmaal leiderschapsrollen heeft vastgesteld, vergeet dan niet te documenteren hoe mensen deze kunnen bereiken! Stel een duidelijk proces vast voor hoe iemand een onderhouder kan worden of lid kan worden van een subcommissie in uw project, en schrijf het op uw GOVERNANCE.md.
-Tools like [Vossibility](https://github.com/icecrime/vossibility-stack) can help you publicly track who is (or isn't) making contributions to the project. Documenting this information avoids the community perception that maintainers are a clique that makes its decisions privately.
+Tools zoals [Vossibility](https://github.com/icecrime/vossibility-stack) kunnen je helpen om publiekelijk bij te houden wie (of niet) bijdraagt aan het project. Door deze informatie te documenteren, wordt de perceptie van de gemeenschap vermeden dat beheerders een kliek zijn die privé beslissingen neemt.
-Finally, if your project is on GitHub, consider moving your project from your personal account to an Organization and adding at least one backup admin. [GitHub Organizations](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-new-organization-account/) make it easier to manage permissions and multiple repositories and protect your project's legacy through [shared ownership](../building-community/#deel-het-eigendom-van-uw-project).
+Ten slotte, als uw project op GitHub staat, overweeg dan om uw project van uw persoonlijke account naar een organisatie te verplaatsen en ten minste één back-upbeheerder toe te voegen. [GitHub Organisations](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-new-organization-account/) maken het gemakkelijker om machtigingen en meerdere opslagplaatsen te beheren en de nalatenschap van je project te beschermen via [gedeeld eigendom](../building-community/#deel-het-eigendom-van-uw-project).
## Wanneer moet ik iemand commit-toegang geven?
-Some people think you should give commit access to everybody who makes a contribution. Doing so could encourage more people to feel ownership of your project.
+Sommige mensen vinden dat je commitment moet geven aan iedereen die een bijdrage levert. Dit zou meer mensen kunnen aanmoedigen om zich eigenaar te voelen van uw project.
-On the other hand, especially for bigger, more complex projects, you may want to only give commit access to people who have demonstrated their commitment. There's no one right way of doing it - do what makes you most comfortable!
+Aan de andere kant, vooral voor grotere, meer complexe projecten, wil je misschien alleen commitment geven aan mensen die hun betrokkenheid hebben getoond. Er is niet één goede manier om het te doen - doe wat je het prettigst vindt!
-If your project is on GitHub, you can use [protected branches](https://help.github.com/articles/about-protected-branches/) to manage who can push to a particular branch, and under which circumstances.
+Als je project op GitHub staat, kun je [beschermde branches](https://help.github.com/articles/about-protected-branches/) gebruiken om te beheren wie naar een bepaalde branch kan pushen, en onder welke omstandigheden.
- Whenever somebody sends you a pull request, give them commit access to your project. While it may sound incredibly stupid at first, using this strategy will allow you to unleash the true power of GitHub. (...) Once people have commit access, they are no longer worried that their patch might go unmerged...causing them to put much more work into it.
+ Elke keer dat iemand je een pull-request stuurt, geef hem dan commit-toegang tot je project. Hoewel het in het begin misschien ongelooflijk stom klinkt, kun je met deze strategie de ware kracht van GitHub ontketenen. (...) Als mensen eenmaal commit-toegang hebben, zijn ze niet langer bang dat hun patch niet zal worden samengevoegd... waardoor ze er veel meer werk in steken.
+
+ _Whenever somebody sends you a pull request, give them commit access to your project. While it may sound incredibly stupid at first, using this strategy will allow you to unleash the true power of GitHub. (...) Once people have commit access, they are no longer worried that their patch might go unmerged...causing them to put much more work into it._
— @felixge, ["The Pull Request Hack"](https://felixge.de/2013/03/11/the-pull-request-hack.html)
@@ -102,64 +110,69 @@ If your project is on GitHub, you can use [protected branches](https://help.gith
## Wat zijn enkele van de algemene bestuursstructuren voor open source-projecten?
-There are three common governance structures associated with open source projects.
+Er zijn drie algemene bestuursstructuren die verband houden met open source-projecten.
-* **BDFL:** BDFL stands for "Benevolent Dictator for Life". Under this structure, one person (usually the initial author of the project) has final say on all major project decisions. [Python](https://github.com/python) is a classic example. Smaller projects are probably BDFL by default, because there are only one or two maintainers. A project that originated at a company might also fall into the BDFL category.
+* **BDFL:** BDFL staat voor "Benevolent Dictator for Life". Volgens deze structuur heeft één persoon (meestal de oorspronkelijke auteur van het project) het laatste woord over alle belangrijke projectbeslissingen. [Python](https://github.com/python) is een klassiek voorbeeld. Kleinere projecten zijn waarschijnlijk standaard BDFL, omdat er maar één of twee beheerders zijn. Een project dat is ontstaan bij een bedrijf kan ook in de categorie BDFL vallen.
-* **Meritocracy:** **(Note: the term "meritocracy" carries negative connotations for some communities and has a [complex social and political history](http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Meritocracy).)** Under a meritocracy, active project contributors (those who demonstrate "merit") are given a formal decision making role. Decisions are usually made based on pure voting consensus. The meritocracy concept was pioneered by the [Apache Foundation](https://www.apache.org/); [all Apache projects](https://www.apache.org/index.html#projects-list) are meritocracies. Contributions can only be made by individuals representing themselves, not by a company.
+* **Meritocratie:** **(Opmerking: de term "meritocratie" heeft een negatieve connotatie voor sommige gemeenschappen en heeft een [complexe sociale en politieke geschiedenis](http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Meritocracy).)** Onder een meritocratie krijgen actieve projectmedewerkers (degenen die "verdienste" aantonen) een formele besluitvormende rol. Beslissingen worden meestal genomen op basis van zuivere stemconsensus. Het concept van meritocratie is ontwikkeld door de [Apache Foundation](https://www.apache.org/); [alle Apache-projecten](https://www.apache.org/index.html#projects-list) zijn meritocratieën. Bijdragen kunnen alleen worden gedaan door individuen die zichzelf vertegenwoordigen, niet door een bedrijf.
-* **Liberal contribution:** Under a liberal contribution model, the people who do the most work are recognized as most influential, but this is based on current work and not historic contributions. Major project decisions are made based on a consensus seeking process (discuss major grievances) rather than pure vote, and strive to include as many community perspectives as possible. Popular examples of projects that use a liberal contribution model include [Node.js](https://foundation.nodejs.org/) and [Rust](https://www.rust-lang.org/).
+* **Liberale bijdrage (_Liberal contribution_):** Volgens een liberaal contributiemodel worden de mensen die het meeste werk doen als meest invloedrijk erkend, maar dit is gebaseerd op huidig werk en niet op historische bijdragen. Beslissingen voor grote projecten worden genomen op basis van een proces van consensus zoeken (bespreek belangrijke grieven) in plaats van pure stemming, en het streven is om zoveel mogelijk gemeenschapsperspectieven op te nemen. Populaire voorbeelden van projecten die een liberaal contributiemodel gebruiken, zijn onder meer [Node.js] (https://foundation.nodejs.org/) en [Rust] (https://www.rust-lang.org/).
-Which one should you use? It's up to you! Every model has advantages and trade-offs. And although they may seem quite different at first, all three models have more in common than they seem. If you're interested in adopting one of these models, check out these templates:
+Welke moet je gebruiken? Het is aan jou! Elk model heeft voordelen en afwegingen. En hoewel ze in eerste instantie misschien heel anders lijken, hebben alle drie de modellen meer gemeen dan ze lijken. Bekijk deze sjablonen als u geïnteresseerd bent in het adopteren van een van deze modellen:
-* [BDFL model template](http://oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/benevolentdictatorgovernancemodel)
-* [Meritocracy model template](http://oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/meritocraticgovernancemodel)
-* [Node.js's liberal contribution policy](https://medium.com/the-node-js-collection/healthy-open-source-967fa8be7951)
+* [BDFL-modelsjabloon](http://oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/benevolentdictatorgovernancemodel)
+* [Modelmodel voor meritocratie](http://oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/meritocraticgovernancemodel)
+* [Node.js's liberale bijdragebeleid](https://medium.com/the-node-js-collection/healthy-open-source-967fa8be7951)
## Heb ik beheersdocumenten nodig wanneer ik mijn project start?
-There is no right time to write down your project's governance, but it's much easier to define once you've seen your community dynamics play out. The best (and hardest) part about open source governance is that it is shaped by the community!
+Er is geen goed moment om de governance van uw project op te schrijven, maar het is veel gemakkelijker te definiëren als u eenmaal de dynamiek van uw gemeenschap heeft gezien. Het beste (en moeilijkste) deel van open source governance is dat het wordt gevormd door de gemeenschap!
-Some early documentation will inevitably contribute to your project's governance, however, so start writing down what you can. For example, you can define clear expectations for behavior, or how your contributor process works, even at your project's launch.
+Sommige vroege documentatie zal echter onvermijdelijk bijdragen aan het beheer van uw project, dus begin met opschrijven wat u kunt. U kunt bijvoorbeeld duidelijke verwachtingen voor gedrag definiëren, of hoe uw bijdragersproces werkt, zelfs bij de lancering van uw project.
-If you're part of a company launching an open source project, it's worth having an internal discussion before launch about how your company expects to maintain and make decisions about the project moving forward. You may also want to publicly explain anything particular to how your company will (or won't!) be involved with the project.
+Als u deel uitmaakt van een bedrijf dat een open source-project lanceert, is het de moeite waard om vóór de lancering een interne discussie te hebben over hoe uw bedrijf verwacht te handhaven en beslissingen te nemen over het toekomstige project. Misschien wilt u ook in het openbaar uitleggen hoe uw bedrijf wel of niet bij het project betrokken zal zijn (of niet!).
- We assign small teams to manage projects on GitHub who are actually working on these at Facebook. For example, React is run by a React engineer.
+ We wijzen kleine teams toe om projecten op GitHub te beheren die hier daadwerkelijk aan werken op Facebook. React wordt bijvoorbeeld gerund door een React-engineer.
+
+ _We assign small teams to manage projects on GitHub who are actually working on these at Facebook. For example, React is run by a React engineer._
-— @caabernathy, ["An inside look at open source at Facebook"](https://opensource.com/life/15/10/ato-interview-christine-abernathy-facebook)
+— @caabernathy, ["Een kijkje in open source bij Facebook"](https://opensource.com/life/15/10/ato-interview-christine-abernathy-facebook)
## Wat gebeurt er als bedrijfsmedewerkers bijdragen beginnen in te dienen?
-Successful open source projects get used by many people and companies, and some companies may eventually have revenue streams eventually tied to the project. For example, a company may use the project's code as one component in a commercial service offering.
+Succesvolle open source-projecten worden door veel mensen en bedrijven gebruikt, en sommige bedrijven kunnen uiteindelijk inkomstenstromen hebben die uiteindelijk aan het project zijn gekoppeld. Een bedrijf kan bijvoorbeeld de projectcode gebruiken als een onderdeel van een commerciële dienstverlening.
-As the project gets more widely used, people who have expertise in it become more in-demand - you may be one of them! - and will sometimes get paid for work they do in the project.
+Naarmate het project op grotere schaal wordt gebruikt, wordt er meer vraag naar mensen die er expertise in hebben - misschien bent u een van hen! - en worden soms betaald voor het werk dat ze in het project doen.
-It's important to treat commercial activity as normal and as just another source of development energy. Paid developers shouldn't get special treatment over unpaid ones, of course; each contribution must be evaluated on its technical merits. However, people should feel comfortable engaging in commercial activity, and feel comfortable stating their use cases when arguing in favor of a particular enhancement or feature.
+Het is belangrijk om commerciële activiteiten als normaal te behandelen en als een nieuwe bron van ontwikkelingsenergie. Betaalde ontwikkelaars mogen natuurlijk geen speciale behandeling krijgen ten opzichte van onbetaalde ontwikkelaars; elke bijdrage moet op zijn technische merites worden beoordeeld. Mensen moeten zich echter op hun gemak voelen bij commerciële activiteiten en zich op hun gemak voelen bij het vermelden van hun gebruiksscenario's wanneer ze pleiten voor een bepaalde verbetering of functie.
-"Commercial" is completely compatible with "open source". "Commercial" just means there is money involved somewhere - that the software is used in commerce, which is increasingly likely as a project gains adoption. (When open source software is used as part of a non-open-source product, the overall product is still "proprietary" software, though, like open source, it might be used for commercial or non-commercial purposes.)
+"Commercial" is volledig compatibel met "open source". "Commercieel" betekent gewoon dat er ergens geld mee gemoeid is - dat de software wordt gebruikt in de handel, wat steeds waarschijnlijker wordt naarmate een project wordt geaccepteerd. (Wanneer open source-software wordt gebruikt als onderdeel van een niet-open-sourceproduct, is het algehele product nog steeds "eigen" software, hoewel het, net als open source, voor commerciële of niet-commerciële doeleinden kan worden gebruikt.)
-Like anyone else, commercially-motivated developers gain influence in the project through the quality and quantity of their contributions. Obviously, a developer who is paid for her time may be able to do more than someone who is not paid, but that's okay: payment is just one of many possible factors that could affect how much someone does. Keep your project discussions focused on the contributions, not on the external factors that enable people to make those contributions.
+Net als ieder ander krijgen commercieel gemotiveerde ontwikkelaars invloed in het project door de kwaliteit en kwantiteit van hun bijdragen. Het is duidelijk dat een ontwikkelaar die voor haar tijd wordt betaald, meer kan dan iemand die niet wordt betaald, maar dat is oké: betaling is slechts een van de vele mogelijke factoren die van invloed kunnen zijn op hoeveel iemand doet. Houd uw projectdiscussies gericht op de bijdragen, niet op de externe factoren waardoor mensen die bijdragen kunnen leveren.
## Heb ik een juridische entiteit nodig om mijn project te ondersteunen?
-You don't need a legal entity to support your open source project unless you're handling money.
+U hebt geen juridische entiteit nodig om uw open source-project te ondersteunen, tenzij u met geld omgaat.
-For example, if you want to create a commercial business, you'll want to set up a C Corp or LLC (if you're based in the US). If you're just doing contract work related to your open source project, you can accept money as a sole proprietor, or set up an LLC (if you're based in the US).
+Als u bijvoorbeeld een commercieel bedrijf wilt opzetten, wilt u een C Corp of LLC opzetten (als u in de VS bent gevestigd). Als u alleen contractwerk doet in verband met uw open source-project, kunt u geld accepteren als een eenmanszaak of een LLC opzetten (als u in de VS bent gevestigd).
-If you want to accept donations for your open source project, you can set up a donation button (using PayPal or Stripe, for example), but the money won't be tax-deductible unless you are a qualifying nonprofit (a 501c3, if you're in the US).
+Als u donaties voor uw open source-project wilt accepteren, kunt u een donatieknop instellen (bijvoorbeeld met PayPal of Stripe), maar het geld is niet aftrekbaar voor de belasting, tenzij u een in aanmerking komende non-profitorganisatie bent (een 501c3, als je bent in de VS).
-Many projects don't wish to go through the trouble of setting up a nonprofit, so they find a nonprofit fiscal sponsor instead. A fiscal sponsor accepts donations on your behalf, usually in exchange for a percentage of the donation. [Software Freedom Conservancy](https://sfconservancy.org/), [Apache Foundation](https://www.apache.org/), [Eclipse Foundation](https://eclipse.org/org/foundation/), [Linux Foundation](https://www.linuxfoundation.org/projects) and [Open Collective](https://opencollective.com/opensource) are examples of organizations that serve as fiscal sponsors for open source projects.
+Veel projecten willen niet de moeite nemen om een non-profitorganisatie op te zetten, dus zoeken ze in plaats daarvan een fiscale sponsor zonder winstoogmerk. Een fiscale sponsor accepteert namens u schenkingen, meestal in ruil voor een percentage van de schenking. [Software Freedom Conservancy](https://sfconservancy.org/), [Apache Foundation](https://www.apache.org/), [Eclipse Foundation](https://eclipse.org/org/foundation/), [Linux Foundation](https://www.linuxfoundation.org/projects) en [Open Collective](https://opencollective.com/opensource) zijn voorbeelden van organisaties die als fiscale sponsors dienen voor open source-projecten.
- Our goal is to provide an infrastructure that communities can use to be self sustainable, thus creating an environment where everyone — contributors, backers, sponsors — get concrete benefits out of it.
+ Our goal is to provide an infrastructure that communities can use to be self sustainable, thus creating an environment where everyone — contributors, backers, sponsors — get concrete benefits out of it.
+
+ _Our goal is to provide an infrastructure that communities can use to be self sustainable, thus creating an environment where everyone — contributors, backers, sponsors — get concrete benefits out of it._
+
-— @piamancini, ["Moving beyond the charity framework"](https://medium.com/open-collective/moving-beyond-the-charity-framework-b1191c33141)
+— @piamancini, ["Verder gaan dan het liefdadigheidskader"](https://medium.com/open-collective/moving-beyond-the-charity-framework-b1191c33141)
-If your project is closely associated with a certain language or ecosystem, there may also be a related software foundation you can work with. For example, the [Python Software Foundation](https://www.python.org/psf/) helps support [PyPI](https://pypi.org/), the Python package manager, and the [Node.js Foundation](https://foundation.nodejs.org/) helps support [Express.js](https://expressjs.com/), a Node-based framework.
+Als uw project nauw verbonden is met een bepaalde taal of een bepaald ecosysteem, kan er ook een gerelateerde softwarefundament zijn waarmee u kunt werken. De [Python Software Foundation](https://www.python.org/psf/) helpt bijvoorbeeld bij het ondersteunen van [PyPI](https://pypi.org/), de Python-pakketbeheerder en de [Node.js Foundation](https://foundation.nodejs.org/) helpt bij het ondersteunen van [Express.js](https://expressjs.com/), een op knooppunten gebaseerd raamwerk.
From 20de1188ee6dea4401b444ede11cf2eed97c8301 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley de Groot
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 17:05:38 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 072/749] Article 'Legal'
---
_articles/nl/legal.md | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/nl/legal.md b/_articles/nl/legal.md
index 8e4c84d961d..68c73cf9194 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/legal.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/legal.md
@@ -20,147 +20,158 @@ related:
## Understanding the legal implications of open source
-Sharing your creative work with the world can be an exciting and rewarding experience. It can also mean a bunch of legal things you didn't know you had to worry about. Thankfully, you don't have to start from scratch. We've got your legal needs covered. (Before you dig in, be sure to read our [disclaimer](/notices/).)
+Het delen van uw creatieve werk met de wereld kan een opwindende en lonende ervaring zijn. Het kan ook een heleboel juridische dingen betekenen waarvan je niet wist dat u zich er zorgen over moest maken. Gelukkig hoef je niet helemaal opnieuw te beginnen. We hebben uw juridische behoeften gedekt. (Lees voordat u verder gaat onze [disclaimer](/notices/).)
## Waarom geven mensen zoveel om de juridische kant van open source?
-Glad you asked! When you make a creative work (such as writing, graphics, or code), that work is under exclusive copyright by default. That is, the law assumes that as the author of your work, you have a say in what others can do with it.
+Blij dat je het vraagt! Wanneer u een creatief werk maakt (zoals schrijven, afbeeldingen of code), valt dat werk standaard onder exclusief auteursrecht. Dat wil zeggen, de wet gaat ervan uit dat u als auteur van uw werk inspraak hebt in wat anderen ermee kunnen doen.
-In general, that means nobody else can use, copy, distribute, or modify your work without being at risk of take-downs, shake-downs, or litigation.
+Over het algemeen betekent dit dat niemand anders uw werk kan gebruiken, kopiëren, distribueren of wijzigen zonder het risico te lopen op uitval, opschudding of rechtszaak.
-Open source is an unusual circumstance, however, because the author expects that others will use, modify, and share the work. But because the legal default is still exclusive copyright, you need a license that explicitly states these permissions.
+Open source is echter een ongebruikelijke omstandigheid, omdat de auteur verwacht dat anderen het werk zullen gebruiken, aanpassen en delen. Maar omdat de wettelijke standaard nog steeds exclusief copyright is, hebt u een licentie nodig waarin deze machtigingen expliciet worden vermeld.
-If you don't apply an open source license, everybody who contributes to your project also becomes an exclusive copyright holder of their work. That means nobody can use, copy, distribute, or modify their contributions -- and that "nobody" includes you.
+Als u geen open source-licentie toepast, wordt iedereen die aan uw project bijdraagt ook de exclusieve copyrighthouder van zijn werk. Dat betekent dat niemand zijn bijdragen kan gebruiken, kopiëren, verspreiden of wijzigen - en dat "niemand" jou ook omvat.
-Finally, your project may have dependencies with license requirements that you weren't aware of. Your project's community, or your employer's policies, may also require your project to use specific open source licenses. We'll cover these situations below.
+Ten slotte kan uw project afhankelijkheden hebben met licentievereisten waarvan u zich niet bewust was. De gemeenschap van uw project of het beleid van uw werkgever kan ook vereisen dat uw project specifieke open source-licenties gebruikt. We behandelen deze situaties hieronder.
## Zijn openbare GitHub-projecten open source?
-When you [create a new project](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-new-repository/) on GitHub, you have the option to make the repository **private** or **public**.
+Wanneer je [een nieuw project maakt](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-new-repository/) op GitHub, heb je de optie om de repository **privé** of **openbaar te maken**.
![Create repository](/assets/images/legal/repo-create-name.png)
-**Making your GitHub project public is not the same as licensing your project.** Public projects are covered by [GitHub's Terms of Service](https://help.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-terms-of-service#3-ownership-of-content-right-to-post-and-license-grants), which allows others to view and fork your project, but your work otherwise comes with no permissions.
+**Het openbaar maken van uw GitHub-project is niet hetzelfde als het licentiëren van uw project.** Openbare projecten vallen onder de [Servicevoorwaarden van GitHub](https://help.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-terms-of-service#3-ownership-of-content-right-to-post-and-license-grants), waarmee anderen uw project kunnen bekijken en splitsen (_een fork_), maar uw werk heeft verder geen rechten.
-If you want others to use, distribute, modify, or contribute back to your project, you need to include an open source license. For example, someone cannot legally use any part of your GitHub project in their code, even if it's public, unless you explicitly give them the right to do so.
+Als u wilt dat anderen uw project gebruiken, distribueren, wijzigen of eraan bijdragen, moet u een open source-licentie opnemen. Iemand kan bijvoorbeeld geen enkel deel van je GitHub-project legaal in zijn code gebruiken, zelfs niet als het openbaar is, tenzij je hem expliciet het recht geeft om dit te doen.
## Geef me gewoon de TL;DR over wat ik nodig heb om mijn project te beschermen
-You're in luck, because today, open source licenses are standardized and easy to use. You can copy-paste an existing license directly into your project.
+Je hebt geluk, want tegenwoordig zijn open source-licenties gestandaardiseerd en gebruiksvriendelijk. U kunt een bestaande licentie rechtstreeks in uw project kopiëren en plakken.
-[MIT](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/), [Apache 2.0](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/), and [GPLv3](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/gpl-3.0/) are the most popular open source licenses, but there are other options to choose from. You can find the full text of these licenses, and instructions on how to use them, on [choosealicense.com](https://choosealicense.com/).
+[MIT](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/), [Apache 2.0](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/) en [GPLv3](https://choicealicense.com/licenses/gpl-3.0/) zijn de meest populaire open source-licenties, maar er zijn andere opties om uit te kiezen. U kunt de volledige tekst van deze licenties en instructies voor het gebruik ervan vinden op [choosealicense.com](https://choosealicense.com/).
-When you create a new project on GitHub, you'll be [asked to add a license](https://help.github.com/articles/open-source-licensing/).
+Wanneer u een nieuw project op GitHub maakt, wordt u [gevraagd om een licentie toe te voegen](https://help.github.com/articles/open-source-licensing/).
- A standardized license serves as a proxy for those without legal training to know precisely what they can and can't do with the software. Unless absolutely required, avoid custom, modified, or non-standard terms, which will serve as a barrier to downstream use of the agency code.
+ Een gestandaardiseerde licentie dient als een proxy voor degenen zonder juridische opleiding om precies te weten wat ze wel en niet kunnen doen met de software. Vermijd, tenzij absoluut vereist, aangepaste, gewijzigde of niet-standaard voorwaarden, die een belemmering zullen vormen voor het downstream-gebruik van de agentschapscode.
+
+ _A standardized license serves as a proxy for those without legal training to know precisely what they can and can't do with the software. Unless absolutely required, avoid custom, modified, or non-standard terms, which will serve as a barrier to downstream use of the agency code._
+
-— @benbalter, ["Everything a government attorney needs to know about open source software licensing"](https://ben.balter.com/2014/10/08/open-source-licensing-for-government-attorneys/)
+— @benbalter, ["Alles wat een overheidsadvocaat moet weten over open source softwarelicenties"](https://ben.balter.com/2014/10/08/open-source-licensing-for-government-attorneys/)
## Welke open source-licentie is geschikt voor mijn project?
-If you're starting from a blank slate, it's hard to go wrong with the [MIT License](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/). It's short, very easy to understand, and allows anyone to do anything so long as they keep a copy of the license, including your copyright notice. You'll be able to release the project under a different license if you ever need to.
+Als je begint met een blanco project, is het moeilijk om fout te gaan met de [MIT License](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/). Het is kort, heel gemakkelijk te begrijpen en staat iedereen toe om alles te doen, zolang ze een kopie van de licentie bewaren, inclusief uw copyrightmelding. U kunt het project onder een andere licentie vrijgeven als dat ooit nodig is.
-Otherwise, picking the right open source license for your project depends on your objectives.
+Anders hangt het kiezen van de juiste open source-licentie voor uw project af van uw doelstellingen.
-Your project very likely has (or will have) **dependencies**. For example, if you're open sourcing a Node.js project, you'll probably use libraries from the Node Package Manager (npm). Each of those libraries you depend on will have its own open source license. If each of their licenses is "permissive" (gives the public permission to use, modify, and share, without any condition for downstream licensing), you can use any license you want. Common permissive licenses include MIT, Apache 2.0, ISC, and BSD.
+Uw project heeft (of zal) zeer waarschijnlijk **afhankelijkheden**. Als u bijvoorbeeld een Node.js-project open source maakt, gebruikt u waarschijnlijk bibliotheken van de Node Package Manager (npm). Elk van die bibliotheken waarvan u afhankelijk bent, heeft zijn eigen open source-licentie. Als elk van hun licenties "permissief" is (geeft het publiek toestemming om te gebruiken, wijzigen en delen, zonder enige voorwaarde voor downstreamlicenties), kunt u elke gewenste licentie gebruiken. Veelgebruikte licenties zijn onder meer MIT, Apache 2.0, ISC en BSD.
-On the other hand, if any of your dependencies' licenses are "strong copyleft" (also gives public same permissions, subject to condition of using the same license downstream), then your project will have to use the same license. Common strong copyleft licenses include GPLv2, GPLv3, and AGPLv3.
+Aan de andere kant, als een van de licenties van je afhankelijkheden "sterk copyleft" is (geeft ook publiek dezelfde permissies, op voorwaarde dat je dezelfde licentie downstream gebruikt), dan zal je project dezelfde licentie moeten gebruiken. Veelgebruikte licenties voor sterke auteursplicht zijn GPLv2, GPLv3 en AGPLv3.
-You may also want to consider the **communities** you hope will use and contribute to your project:
+U kunt ook de **gemeenschappen** overwegen waarvan u hoopt dat ze zullen gebruiken en bijdragen aan uw project:
-* **Do you want your project to be used as a dependency by other projects?** Probably best to use the most popular license in your relevant community. For example, [MIT](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/) is the most popular license for [npm libraries](https://libraries.io/search?platforms=NPM).
-* **Do you want your project to appeal to large businesses?** A large business will likely want an express patent license from all contributors. In this case, [Apache 2.0](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/) has you (and them) covered.
-* **Do you want your project to appeal to contributors who do not want their contributions to be used in closed source software?** [GPLv3](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/gpl-3.0/) or (if they also do not wish to contribute to closed source services) [AGPLv3](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/agpl-3.0/) will go over well.
+* **Wilt u dat uw project wordt gebruikt als afhankelijkheid door andere projecten?** Waarschijnlijk het beste om de meest populaire licentie in uw relevante gemeenschap te gebruiken. [MIT](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/) is bijvoorbeeld de meest populaire licentie voor [npm libraries](https://libraries.io/search?platforms=NPM).
+* **Wilt u dat uw project grote bedrijven aanspreekt?** Een groot bedrijf wil waarschijnlijk een uitdrukkelijke patentlicentie van alle bijdragers. In dit geval heeft [Apache 2.0](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/apache-2.0/) jou (en hen) gedekt.
+* **Wilt u dat uw project een beroep doet op bijdragers die niet willen dat hun bijdragen worden gebruikt in closed source-software?** [GPLv3](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/gpl-3.0/) of (indien ze willen ook niet bijdragen aan closed source-diensten) [AGPLv3](https://choosealicense.com/licenses/agpl-3.0/) zal goed overkomen.
-Your **company** may have specific licensing requirements for its open source projects. For example, it may require a permissive license so that the company can use your project in the company's closed source product. Or your company may require a strong copyleft license and an additional contributor agreement (see below) so that only your company, and nobody else, can use your project in closed source software. Or your company may have certain needs related to standards, social responsibility, or transparency, any of which could require a particular licensing strategy. Talk to your [company's legal department](#wat-moet-het-juridische-team-van-mijn-bedrijf-weten).
+Uw **bedrijf** heeft mogelijk specifieke licentievereisten voor zijn open source-projecten. Het kan bijvoorbeeld een vergunning vereisen, zodat het bedrijf uw project kan gebruiken in het closed source-product van het bedrijf. Of uw bedrijf heeft mogelijk een sterke auteursplichtlicentie en een aanvullende bijdragersovereenkomst nodig (zie hieronder) zodat alleen uw bedrijf, en niemand anders, uw project kan gebruiken in closed source-software. Of uw bedrijf kan bepaalde behoeften hebben met betrekking tot normen, sociale verantwoordelijkheid of transparantie, die elk een bepaalde licentiestrategie vereisen. Neem contact op met de juridische afdeling van uw [bedrijf](#wat-moet-het-juridische-team-van-mijn-bedrijf-weten).
-When you create a new project on GitHub, you are given the option to select a license. Including one of the licenses mentioned above will make your GitHub project open source. If you'd like to see other options, check out [choosealicense.com](https://choosealicense.com) to find the right license for your project, even if it [isn't software](https://choosealicense.com/non-software/).
+Wanneer u een nieuw project op GitHub maakt, krijgt u de mogelijkheid om een licentie te selecteren. Als u een van de bovengenoemde licenties opneemt, wordt uw GitHub-project open source. Als je andere opties wilt zien, ga dan naar [choosealicense.com](https://choosealicense.com) om de juiste licentie voor je project te vinden, zelfs als het [geen software is](https://choosealicense.com/non-software/).
## Wat moet ik doen als ik de licentie van mijn project wil wijzigen?
-Most projects never need to change licenses. But occasionally circumstances change.
+De meeste projecten hoeven nooit van licentie te wisselen. Maar af en toe veranderen de omstandigheden.
-For example, as your project grows it adds dependencies or users, or your company changes strategies, any of which could require or want a different license. Also, if you neglected to license your project from the start, adding a license is effectively the same as changing licenses. There are three fundamental things to consider when adding or changing your project's license:
+Naarmate uw project groeit, voegt het bijvoorbeeld afhankelijkheden of gebruikers toe, of verandert uw bedrijf van strategie, die voor elk een andere licentie kunnen vereisen of willen. Als u vanaf het begin geen licentie voor uw project hebt verleend, is het toevoegen van een licentie in feite hetzelfde als het wijzigen van licenties. Er zijn drie fundamentele zaken waarmee u rekening moet houden bij het toevoegen of wijzigen van de licentie van uw project:
-**It's complicated.** Determining license compatibility and compliance and who holds copyright can get complicated and confusing very quickly. Switching to a new but compatible license for new releases and contributions is different from relicensing all existing contributions. Involve your legal team at the first hint of any desire to change licenses. Even if you have or can obtain permission from your project's copyright holders for a license change, consider the impact of the change on your project's other users and contributors. Think of a license change as a "governance event" for your project that will more likely go smoothly with clear communications and consultation with your project's stakeholders. All the more reason to choose and use an appropriate license for your project from its inception!
+**Het is ingewikkeld.** Het bepalen van de compatibiliteit en naleving van licenties en wie het auteursrecht bezit, kan zeer snel ingewikkeld en verwarrend worden. Overschakelen naar een nieuwe maar compatibele licentie voor nieuwe releases en bijdragen is iets anders dan alle bestaande bijdragen opnieuw licentiëren. Betrek uw juridische team bij de eerste aanwijzing dat u licenties wilt wijzigen. Zelfs als u toestemming hebt of kunt krijgen van de auteursrechthouders van uw project voor een licentiewijziging, moet u rekening houden met de impact van de wijziging op de andere gebruikers en bijdragers van uw project. Beschouw een licentiewijziging als een "bestuursgebeurtenis" voor uw project dat waarschijnlijk vlotter zal verlopen met duidelijke communicatie en overleg met de belanghebbenden van uw project. Reden te meer om vanaf het begin een geschikte licentie voor uw project te kiezen en te gebruiken!
-**Your project's existing license.** If your project's existing license is compatible with the license you want to change to, you could just start using the new license. That's because if license A is compatible with license B, you'll comply with the terms of A while complying with the terms of B (but not necessarily vice versa). So if you're currently using a permissive license (e.g., MIT), you could change to a license with more conditions, so long as you retain a copy of the MIT license and any associated copyright notices (i.e., continue to comply with the MIT license's minimal conditions). But if your current license is not permissive (e.g., copyleft, or you don't have a license) and you aren't the sole copyright holder, you couldn't just change your project's license to MIT. Essentially, with a permissive license the project's copyright holders have given permission in advance to change licenses.
+**De bestaande licentie van uw project.** Als de bestaande licentie van uw project compatibel is met de licentie waarnaar u wilt overschakelen, kunt u de nieuwe licentie gewoon gaan gebruiken. Dat komt omdat als licentie A compatibel is met licentie B, u voldoet aan de voorwaarden van A terwijl u voldoet aan de voorwaarden van B (maar niet noodzakelijkerwijs andersom). Dus als u momenteel een toegestane licentie gebruikt (bijv. MIT), kunt u overschakelen naar een licentie met meer voorwaarden, zolang u een kopie van de MIT-licentie en eventuele bijbehorende copyrightkennisgevingen bewaart (dat wil zeggen, blijf voldoen aan de Minimale voorwaarden van de MIT-licentie). Maar als je huidige licentie niet toelaatbaar is (bijv. Copyleft, of je hebt geen licentie) en je bent niet de enige copyrighthouder, dan zou je niet zomaar de licentie van je project kunnen veranderen in MIT. In wezen hebben de auteursrechthouders van het project met een toegestane licentie van tevoren toestemming gegeven om licenties te wijzigen.
-**Your project's existing copyright holders.** If you're the sole contributor to your project then either you or your company is the project's sole copyright holder. You can add or change to whatever license you or your company wants to. Otherwise there may be other copyright holders that you need agreement from in order to change licenses. Who are they? People who have commits in your project is a good place to start. But in some cases copyright will be held by those people's employers. In some cases people will have only made minimal contributions, but there's no hard and fast rule that contributions under some number of lines of code are not subject to copyright. What to do? It depends. For a relatively small and young project, it may be feasible to get all existing contributors to agree to a license change in an issue or pull request. For large and long-lived projects, you may have to seek out many contributors and even their heirs. Mozilla took years (2001-2006) to relicense Firefox, Thunderbird, and related software.
+**De bestaande auteursrechthouders van uw project.** Als u de enige bijdrager aan uw project bent, bent u of uw bedrijf de enige houder van het auteursrecht van het project. U kunt elke licentie die u of uw bedrijf wenst, toevoegen of wijzigen. Anders zijn er mogelijk andere auteursrechthouders met wie u toestemming nodig heeft om licenties te wijzigen. Wie zijn zij? Mensen die commits hebben in uw project, zijn een goede plek om te beginnen. Maar in sommige gevallen berust het auteursrecht bij de werkgevers van die mensen. In sommige gevallen hebben mensen slechts minimale bijdragen geleverd, maar er is geen vaste regel dat bijdragen onder een aantal coderegels niet onderhevig zijn aan auteursrechten. Wat te doen? Het hangt er van af. Voor een relatief klein en jong project kan het haalbaar zijn om alle bestaande bijdragers zover te krijgen dat ze instemmen met een licentiewijziging in een issue of pull-aanvraag. Voor grote en langlopende projecten moet u mogelijk veel bijdragers en zelfs hun erfgenamen zoeken. Mozilla heeft jaren (2001-2006) nodig gehad om Firefox, Thunderbird en gerelateerde software opnieuw te licentiëren.
-Alternatively, you can have contributors agree in advance (via an additional contributor agreement -- see below) to certain license changes under certain conditions, beyond those allowed by your existing open source license. This shifts the complexity of changing licenses a bit. You'll need more help from your lawyers up front, and you'll still want to clearly communicate with your project's stakeholders when executing a license change.
+Als alternatief kunt u bijdragers van tevoren laten instemmen (via een aanvullende overeenkomst voor bijdragers - zie hieronder) met bepaalde licentiewijzigingen onder bepaalde voorwaarden, naast die welke zijn toegestaan door uw bestaande open source-licentie. Dit verschuift de complexiteit van het wijzigen van licenties een beetje. U heeft vooraf meer hulp van uw advocaten nodig en u wilt toch duidelijk communiceren met de belanghebbenden van uw project wanneer u een licentiewijziging doorvoert.
## Heeft mijn project een aanvullende contribuantenovereenkomst nodig?
-Probably not. For the vast majority of open source projects, an open source license implicitly serves as both the inbound (from contributors) and outbound (to other contributors and users) license. If your project is on GitHub, the GitHub Terms of Service make "inbound=outbound" the [explicit default](https://help.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-terms-of-service#6-contributions-under-repository-license).
+Waarschijnlijk niet. Voor de overgrote meerderheid van open source-projecten dient een open source-licentie impliciet als zowel de inkomende (van bijdragers) als uitgaande (naar andere bijdragers en gebruikers) licentie. Als uw project zich op GitHub bevindt, maken de Servicevoorwaarden van GitHub "inbound = outbound" tot de [expliciete standaard](https://help.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-terms-of-service#6-contributions-under-repository-license).
-An additional contributor agreement -- often called a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) -- can create administrative work for project maintainers. How much work an agreement adds depends on the project and implementation. A simple agreement might require that contributors confirm, with a click, that they have the rights necessary to contribute under the project open source license. A more complicated agreement might require legal review and sign-off from contributors' employers.
+Een aanvullende bijdragersovereenkomst -- vaak een bijdragerslicentieovereenkomst (CLA) genoemd -- kan administratief werk creëren voor projectbeheerders. Hoeveel werk een overeenkomst toevoegt, hangt af van het project en de uitvoering. Een eenvoudige overeenkomst kan vereisen dat bijdragers met een klik bevestigen dat ze de benodigde rechten hebben om bij te dragen onder de open source-licentie van het project. Een meer gecompliceerde overeenkomst vereist mogelijk juridische beoordeling en goedkeuring door de werkgevers van contribuanten.
-Also, by adding "paperwork" that some believe is unnecessary, hard to understand, or unfair (when the agreement recipient gets more rights than contributors or the public do via the project's open source license), an additional contributor agreement may be perceived as unfriendly to the project's community.
+Door ook 'papierwerk' toe te voegen waarvan sommigen denken dat het onnodig, moeilijk te begrijpen of oneerlijk is (wanneer de ontvanger van de overeenkomst meer rechten krijgt dan bijdragers of het publiek via de open source-licentie van het project), kan een aanvullende overeenkomst voor bijdragers als onvriendelijk worden ervaren aan de gemeenschap van het project.
- We have eliminated the CLA for Node.js. Doing this lowers the barrier to entry for Node.js contributors thereby broadening the contributor base.
+ We hebben de CLA voor Node.js. Door dit te doen, wordt de toegangsdrempel voor Node.js-bijdragers verlaagd, waardoor het aantal bijdragers wordt verbreed.
+
+ _We have eliminated the CLA for Node.js. Doing this lowers the barrier to entry for Node.js contributors thereby broadening the contributor base._
+
-— @bcantrill, ["Broadening Node.js Contributions"](https://www.joyent.com/blog/broadening-node-js-contributions)
+— @bcantrill, ["Node.js-bijdragen verbreden"](https://www.joyent.com/blog/broadening-node-js-contributions)
+Enkele situaties waarin u wellicht een aanvullende bijdrageovereenkomst voor uw project wilt overwegen, zijn onder meer:
-Some situations where you may want to consider an additional contributor agreement for your project include:
+* Uw advocaten willen dat alle bijdragers uitdrukkelijk (_tekenen_, online of offline) contributievoorwaarden accepteren, misschien omdat ze vinden dat de open source-licentie zelf niet voldoende is (ook al is het dat wel!). Als dit de enige zorg is, zou een bijdragersovereenkomst moeten volstaan die de open source-licentie van het project bevestigt. De [jQuery Individual Contributor License Agreement](https://contribute.jquery.org/CLA/) is een goed voorbeeld van een lichtgewicht aanvullende overeenkomst voor bijdragers.
+* U of uw advocaten willen dat ontwikkelaars verklaren dat elke toezegging die ze doen, geautoriseerd is. Een [Developer Certificate of Origin](https://developercertificate.org/) vereiste is hoeveel projecten dit bereiken. De Node.js-community [gebruikt](https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/HEAD/CONTRIBUTING.md) bijvoorbeeld de DCO [in plaats daarvan](https://nodejs.org/en/blog/uncategorized/notes-from-the-road/#easier-contribution) van hun eerdere cao. Een eenvoudige optie om de handhaving van de DCO op uw repository te automatiseren, is de [DCO Probot] (https://github.com/probot/dco).
+* Uw project maakt gebruik van een open source-licentie die geen uitdrukkelijke octrooiverlening omvat (zoals MIT), en u hebt een octrooiverlening nodig van alle bijdragers, van wie sommigen mogelijk werken voor bedrijven met grote octrooiportefeuilles die kunnen worden gebruikt om u te targeten of de andere bijdragers en gebruikers van het project. De [Apache-licentieovereenkomst voor individuele bijdragers](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf) is een veelgebruikte aanvullende overeenkomst voor bijdragers met een octrooiverlening die overeenkomt met die in de Apache-licentie 2.0.
+* Uw project valt onder een auteursplichtlicentie, maar u moet ook een eigen versie van het project distribueren. Je hebt elke bijdrager nodig om het auteursrecht aan jou toe te wijzen of jou (maar niet het publiek) een permissieve licentie te verlenen. De [MongoDB-bijdragersovereenkomst](https://www.mongodb.com/legal/contributor-agreement) is een voorbeeld van dit type overeenkomst.
+* U denkt dat uw project mogelijk licenties moet wijzigen gedurende de levensduur en u wilt dat bijdragers van tevoren akkoord gaan met dergelijke wijzigingen.
-* Your lawyers want all contributors to expressly accept (_sign_, online or offline) contribution terms, perhaps because they feel the open source license itself is not enough (even though it is!). If this is the only concern, a contributor agreement that affirms the project's open source license should be enough. The [jQuery Individual Contributor License Agreement](https://contribute.jquery.org/CLA/) is a good example of a lightweight additional contributor agreement.
-* You or your lawyers want developers to represent that each commit they make is authorized. A [Developer Certificate of Origin](https://developercertificate.org/) requirement is how many projects achieve this. For example, the Node.js community [uses](https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/HEAD/CONTRIBUTING.md) the DCO [instead](https://nodejs.org/en/blog/uncategorized/notes-from-the-road/#easier-contribution) of their prior CLA. A simple option to automate enforcement of the DCO on your repository is the [DCO Probot](https://github.com/probot/dco).
-* Your project uses an open source license that does not include an express patent grant (such as MIT), and you need a patent grant from all contributors, some of whom may work for companies with large patent portfolios that could be used to target you or the project's other contributors and users. The [Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf) is a commonly used additional contributor agreement that has a patent grant mirroring the one found in the Apache License 2.0.
-* Your project is under a copyleft license, but you also need to distribute a proprietary version of the project. You'll need every contributor to assign copyright to you or grant you (but not the public) a permissive license. The [MongoDB Contributor Agreement](https://www.mongodb.com/legal/contributor-agreement) is an example this type of agreement.
-* You think your project might need to change licenses over its lifetime and want contributors to agree in advance to such changes.
-
-If you do need to use an additional contributor agreement with your project, consider using an integration such as [CLA assistant](https://github.com/cla-assistant/cla-assistant) to minimize contributor distraction.
+Als je toch een aanvullende bijdragersovereenkomst nodig hebt voor je project, overweeg dan om een integratie zoals [CLA-assistent](https://github.com/cla-assistant/cla-assistant) te gebruiken om afleiding van bijdragers te minimaliseren.
## Wat moet het juridische team van mijn bedrijf weten?
-If you're releasing an open source project as a company employee, first, your legal team should know that you're open sourcing a project.
+Als u als bedrijfsmedewerker een open source-project vrijgeeft, moet uw juridische team eerst weten dat u een project open source maakt.
-For better or worse, consider letting them know even if it's a personal project. You probably have an "employee IP agreement" with your company that gives them some control of your projects, especially if they are at all related to the company's business or you use any company resources to develop the project. Your company _should_ easily give you permission, and maybe already has through an employee-friendly IP agreement or a company policy. If not, you can negotiate (for example, explain that your project serves the company's professional learning and development objectives for you), or avoid working on your project until you find a better company.
+Overweeg om ze te laten weten, of het nu een persoonlijk project is, of het nu beter of slechter is. U hebt waarschijnlijk een "IP-overeenkomst voor werknemers" met uw bedrijf die hen enige controle geeft over uw projecten, vooral als ze überhaupt verband houden met de zaken van het bedrijf of als u bedrijfsmiddelen gebruikt om het project te ontwikkelen. Uw bedrijf _moet_ u gemakkelijk toestemming geven, en heeft dat misschien al gedaan via een werknemersvriendelijke IE-overeenkomst of een bedrijfsbeleid. Zo niet, dan kunt u onderhandelen (leg bijvoorbeeld uit dat uw project de professionele leer- en ontwikkelingsdoelstellingen van het bedrijf voor u dient), of werk niet aan uw project totdat u een beter bedrijf heeft gevonden.
-**If you're open sourcing a project for your company,** then definitely let them know. Your legal team probably already has policies for what open source license (and maybe additional contributor agreement) to use based on the company's business requirements and expertise around ensuring your project complies with the licenses of its dependencies. If not, you and they are in luck! Your legal team should be eager to work with you to figure this stuff out. Some things to think about:
+**Als u een open source project voor uw bedrijf zoekt,** laat het hen dan zeker weten. Uw juridische team heeft waarschijnlijk al beleid voor welke open source-licentie (en misschien een aanvullende bijdragersovereenkomst) moet worden gebruikt op basis van de zakelijke vereisten en expertise van het bedrijf om ervoor te zorgen dat uw project voldoet aan de licenties van zijn afhankelijkheden. Zo niet, dan hebben jij en zij geluk! Uw juridische team zou graag met u willen samenwerken om dit uit te zoeken. Enkele dingen om over na te denken:
-* **Third party material:** Does your project have dependencies created by others or otherwise include or use others' code? If these are open source, you'll need to comply with the materials' open source licenses. That starts with choosing a license that works with the third party open source licenses (see above). If your project modifies or distributes third party open source material, then your legal team will also want to know that you're meeting other conditions of the third party open source licenses such as retaining copyright notices. If your project uses others' code that doesn't have an open source license, you'll probably have to ask the third party maintainers to [add an open source license](https://choosealicense.com/no-license/#for-users), and if you can't get one, stop using their code in your project.
+* **Materiaal van derden:** Heeft uw project afhankelijkheden die door anderen zijn gecreëerd of bevat of gebruikt u anderszins code van anderen? Als deze open source zijn, moet u voldoen aan de open source-licenties van het materiaal. Dat begint met het kiezen van een licentie die werkt met de open source-licenties van derden (zie hierboven). Als uw project open source-materiaal van derden wijzigt of verspreidt, zal uw juridische team ook willen weten dat u voldoet aan andere voorwaarden van de open source-licenties van derden, zoals het behouden van copyrightkennisgevingen. Als uw project code van anderen gebruikt die geen open source-licentie heeft, moet u waarschijnlijk de externe beheerders vragen om [een open source-licentie toe te voegen](https://choosealicense.com/no-license/#for-users), en als u er geen kunt krijgen, stop dan met het gebruik van hun code in uw project.
-* **Trade secrets:** Consider whether there is anything in the project that the company does not want to make available to the general public. If so, you could open source the rest of your project, after extracting the material you want to keep private.
+* **Handelsgeheimen:** Bedenk of er iets in het project staat dat het bedrijf niet beschikbaar wil stellen aan het grote publiek. Als dat het geval is, kunt u de rest van uw project open source maken, nadat u het materiaal hebt geëxtraheerd dat u privé wilt houden.
-* **Patents:** Is your company applying for a patent of which open sourcing your project would constitute [public disclosure](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_disclosure)? Sadly, you might be asked to wait (or maybe the company will reconsider the wisdom of the application). If you're expecting contributions to your project from employees of companies with large patent portfolios, your legal team may want you to use a license with an express patent grant from contributors (such as Apache 2.0 or GPLv3), or an additional contributor agreement (see above).
+* **Octrooien:** Vraagt uw bedrijf een octrooi aan waarvan open sourcing uw project [openbaar](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_disclosure) zou maken? Helaas wordt u mogelijk gevraagd om te wachten (of misschien heroverweegt het bedrijf de wijsheid van de toepassing). Als u bijdragen aan uw project verwacht van werknemers van bedrijven met grote octrooiportefeuilles, kan uw juridische team willen dat u een licentie gebruikt met een uitdrukkelijke octrooiverlening van bijdragers (zoals Apache 2.0 of GPLv3), of een aanvullende bijdragersovereenkomst (zie hierboven).
-* **Trademarks:** Double check that your project's name [does not conflict with any existing trademarks](../starting-a-project/#naamconflicten-vermijden). If you use your own company trademarks in the project, check that it does not cause any conflicts. [FOSSmarks](http://fossmarks.org/) is a practical guide to understanding trademarks in the context of free and open source projects.
+* **Handelsmerken:** Controleer nogmaals of de naam van uw project [niet in strijd is met bestaande handelsmerken](../starting-a-project/#naamconflicten-vermijden). Als u in het project uw eigen bedrijfsmerken gebruikt, controleer dan of dit geen conflicten veroorzaakt. [FOSSmarks](http://fossmarks.org/) is een praktische gids om handelsmerken te begrijpen in de context van gratis en open source projecten.
-* **Privacy:** Does your project collect data on users? "Phone home" to company servers? Your legal team can help you comply with company policies and external regulations.
+* **Privacy:** Verzamelt uw project gegevens over gebruikers? 'Naar huis bellen' naar bedrijfsservers? Uw juridische team kan u helpen bij het naleven van het bedrijfsbeleid en externe regelgeving.
-If you're releasing your company's first open source project, the above is more than enough to get through (but don't worry, most projects shouldn't raise any major concerns).
+Als u het eerste open source-project van uw bedrijf uitbrengt, is het bovenstaande meer dan voldoende om erdoorheen te komen (maar maakt u zich geen zorgen, de meeste projecten zouden geen grote zorgen moeten baren).
-Longer term, your legal team can do more to help the company get more from its involvement in open source, and stay safe:
+Op de langere termijn kan uw juridische team meer doen om het bedrijf te helpen meer uit zijn betrokkenheid bij open source te halen en veilig te blijven:
-* **Employee contribution policies:** Consider developing a corporate policy that specifies how your employees contribute to open source projects. A clear policy will reduce confusion among your employees and help them contribute to open source projects in the company's best interest, whether as part of their jobs or in their free time. A good example is Rackspace's [Model IP and Open Source Contribution Policy](https://processmechanics.com/2015/07/22/a-model-ip-and-open-source-contribution-policy/).
+* **Beleid inzake werknemersbijdragen:** Overweeg om een bedrijfsbeleid te ontwikkelen dat aangeeft hoe uw werknemers bijdragen aan open source-projecten. Een duidelijk beleid zal de verwarring onder uw medewerkers verminderen en hen helpen bij te dragen aan open source-projecten in het belang van het bedrijf, zowel als onderdeel van hun baan als in hun vrije tijd. Een goed voorbeeld is Rackspace's [Model IP and Open Source Contribution Policy] (https://processmechanics.com/2015/07/22/a-model-ip-and-open-source-contribution-policy/).
- Letting out the IP associated with a patch builds the employee's knowledge base and reputation. It shows that the company is invested in the development of that employee and creates a sense of empowerment and autonomy. All of these benefits also lead to higher morale and better employee retention.
+ Door de interlectuele eigenschap die aan een patch is gekoppeld, te verhuren, wordt de kennisbasis en de reputatie van de werknemer opgebouwd. Het laat zien dat het bedrijf investeert in de ontwikkeling van die medewerker en creëert een gevoel van empowerment en autonomie. Al deze voordelen leiden ook tot een hoger moreel en een beter behoud van werknemers.
+
+ _Letting out the IP associated with a patch builds the employee's knowledge base and reputation. It shows that the company is invested in the development of that employee and creates a sense of empowerment and autonomy. All of these benefits also lead to higher morale and better employee retention._
+
-— @vanl, ["A Model IP and Open Source Contribution Policy"](https://processmechanics.com/2015/07/22/a-model-ip-and-open-source-contribution-policy/)
+— @vanl, ["Een modelbeleid inzake intellectuele eigendom en bijdragen aan open source"](https://processmechanics.com/2015/07/22/a-model-ip-and-open-source-contribution-policy/)
-* **What to release:** [(Almost) everything?](http://tom.preston-werner.com/2011/11/22/open-source-everything.html) If your legal team understands and is invested in your company's open source strategy, they'll be best able to help rather than hinder your efforts.
-* **Compliance:** Even if your company doesn't release any open source projects, it uses others' open source software. [Awareness and process](https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/2015/06/why-companies-that-use-open-source-need-a-compliance-program/) can prevent headaches, product delays, and lawsuits.
+* **Wat vrij te geven:** [(Bijna) alles?] (Http://tom.preston-werner.com/2011/11/22/open-source-everything.html) Als uw juridische team het begrijpt en geïnvesteerd in de open source-strategie van uw bedrijf, zullen ze u het beste kunnen helpen in plaats van hinderen.
+* **Naleving:** Zelfs als uw bedrijf geen open source-projecten vrijgeeft, gebruikt het open source-software van anderen. [Bewustwording en proces](https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/2015/06/why-companies-that-use-open-source-need-a-compliance-program/) kan hoofdpijn, productvertragingen, en rechtszaken voorkomen.
- Organizations must have a license and compliance strategy in place that fits both \["permissive" and "copyleft"\] categories. This begins with keeping a record of the licensing terms that apply to the open source software you’re using — including subcomponents and dependencies.
+ Organisaties moeten een licentie- en nalevingsstrategie hebben die past in de categorieën \["tolerant" en "copyleft"\]. Dit begint met het bijhouden van de licentievoorwaarden die van toepassing zijn op de open source-software die u gebruikt, inclusief subcomponenten en afhankelijkheden.
+
+ _Organizations must have a license and compliance strategy in place that fits both \["permissive" and "copyleft"\] categories. This begins with keeping a record of the licensing terms that apply to the open source software you’re using — including subcomponents and dependencies._
+
-— Heather Meeker, ["Open Source Software: Compliance Basics And Best Practices"](https://techcrunch.com/2012/12/14/open-source-software-compliance-basics-and-best-practices/)
+— Heather Meeker, ["Open source-software: basisprincipes van compliance en best practices"](https://techcrunch.com/2012/12/14/open-source-software-compliance-basics-and-best-practices/)
-* **Patents:** Your company may wish to join the [Open Invention Network](https://www.openinventionnetwork.com/), a shared defensive patent pool to protect members' use of major open source projects, or explore other [alternative patent licensing](https://www.eff.org/document/hacking-patent-system-2016).
-* **Governance:** Especially if and when it makes sense to move a project to a [legal entity outside of the company](../leadership-and-governance/#heb-ik-een-juridische-entiteit-nodig-om-mijn-project-te-ondersteunen).
+* **Patenten:** Uw bedrijf wil wellicht lid worden van het [Open Invention Network](https://www.openinventionnetwork.com/), een gedeelde defensieve patentpool om het gebruik van grote open source-projecten door leden te beschermen, of andere [alternatieve patentlicenties](https://www.eff.org/document/hacking-patent-system-2016).
+* **Governance:** Zeker als en wanneer het zinvol is om een project te verhuizen naar een [juridische entiteit buiten het bedrijf](../leadership-and-governance/#heb-ik-een-juridische-entiteit-nodig-om-mijn-project-te-ondersteunen).
From e37c96b67165fdcaf4a3d1a733ddec2989a4d2ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wesley de Groot
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 17:46:01 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 073/749] Article 'How to Contribute'
---
_articles/nl/how-to-contribute.md | 432 ++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 226 insertions(+), 206 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/nl/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/nl/how-to-contribute.md
index 0d67031233f..dc7ee302cab 100644
--- a/_articles/nl/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/_articles/nl/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -21,206 +21,217 @@ related:
- Working on \[freenode\] helped me earn many of the skills I later used for my studies in university and my actual job. I think working on open source projects helps me as much as it helps the project!
+ Door aan \[freenode\] te werken, heb ik veel van de vaardigheden verworven die ik later gebruikte voor mijn studie aan de universiteit en mijn huidige baan. Ik denk dat werken aan open source-projecten mij net zo goed helpt als het project!
+
+ _Working on \[freenode\] helped me earn many of the skills I later used for my studies in university and my actual job. I think working on open source projects helps me as much as it helps the project!_
-— @errietta, ["Why I love contributing to open source software"](https://www.errietta.me/blog/open-source/)
+— @errietta, ["Waarom ik graag bijdraag aan open source software"](https://www.errietta.me/blog/open-source/)
-Contributing to open source can be a rewarding way to learn, teach, and build experience in just about any skill you can imagine.
+Bijdragen aan open source kan een lonende manier zijn om te leren, les te geven en ervaring op te doen met vrijwel elke vaardigheid die je maar kunt bedenken.
-Why do people contribute to open source? Plenty of reasons!
+Waarom dragen mensen bij aan open source? Redenen genoeg!
-### Improve software you rely on
+### Verbeter de software waarop u vertrouwt
-Lots of open source contributors start by being users of software they contribute to. When you find a bug in an open source software you use, you may want to look at the source to see if you can patch it yourself. If that's the case, then contributing the patch back is the best way to ensure that your friends (and yourself when you update to the next release) will be able to benefit from it.
+Veel open source-bijdragers beginnen door gebruikers te zijn van software waaraan ze bijdragen. Als je een bug vindt in open source-software die je gebruikt, wil je misschien naar de bron kijken om te zien of je deze zelf kunt patchen. Als dat het geval is, is het bijdragen van de patch de beste manier om ervoor te zorgen dat uw vrienden (en uzelf wanneer u een update naar de volgende release uitvoert) hiervan kunnen profiteren.
-### Improve existing skills
+### Verbeter bestaande vaardigheden
-Whether it's coding, user interface design, graphic design, writing, or organizing, if you're looking for practice, there's a task for you on an open source project.
+Of het nu gaat om codering, ontwerp van gebruikersinterface, grafisch ontwerp, schrijven of organiseren, als u op zoek bent naar oefening, is er een taak voor u in een open source-project.
-### Meet people who are interested in similar things
+### Ontmoet mensen die geïnteresseerd zijn in soortgelijke dingen
-Open source projects with warm, welcoming communities keep people coming back for years. Many people form lifelong friendships through their participation in open source, whether it's running into each other at conferences or late night online chats about burritos.
+Open source-projecten met warme, gastvrije gemeenschappen zorgen ervoor dat mensen jarenlang terug blijven komen. Veel mensen vormen vriendschappen voor het leven door deel te nemen aan open source, of ze nu elkaar tegenkomen op conferenties of 's avonds laat online chats over burrito's.
-### Find mentors and teach others
+### Vind mentoren en leer anderen
-Working with others on a shared project means you'll have to explain how you do things, as well as ask other people for help. The acts of learning and teaching can be a fulfilling activity for everyone involved.
+Als je met anderen aan een gedeeld project werkt, moet je uitleggen hoe je de dingen doet, en ook andere mensen om hulp vragen. Het leren en onderwijzen kan voor alle betrokkenen een bevredigende activiteit zijn.
-### Build public artifacts that help you grow a reputation (and a career)
+### Bouw openbare artefacten waarmee u een reputatie (en een carrière) kunt opbouwen
-By definition, all of your open source work is public, which means you get free examples to take anywhere as a demonstration of what you can do.
+Al uw open source-werk is per definitie openbaar, wat betekent dat u gratis voorbeelden krijgt die u overal mee naartoe kunt nemen als demonstratie van wat u kunt doen.
-### Learn people skills
+### Leer de vaardigheden van mensen
-Open source offers opportunities to practice leadership and management skills, such as resolving conflicts, organizing teams of people, and prioritizing work.
+Open source biedt mogelijkheden om leiderschaps- en managementvaardigheden te oefenen, zoals het oplossen van conflicten, het organiseren van teams van mensen en het prioriteren van werk.
-### It's empowering to be able to make changes, even small ones
+### Het geeft kracht om veranderingen aan te brengen, zelfs kleine
-You don't have to become a lifelong contributor to enjoy participating in open source. Have you ever seen a typo on a website, and wished someone would fix it? On an open source project, you can do just that. Open source helps people feel agency over their lives and how they experience the world, and that in itself is gratifying.
+U hoeft geen levenslange donateur te worden om te genieten van deelname aan open source. Heb je ooit een typefout op een website gezien en zou je willen dat iemand het zou repareren? Bij een open source-project kunt u precies dat doen. Open source helpt mensen keuzevrijheid te voelen over hun leven en hoe zij de wereld ervaren, en dat is op zichzelf al verheugend.
## Wat het betekent om bij te dragen
-If you're a new open source contributor, the process can be intimidating. How do you find the right project? What if you don't know how to code? What if something goes wrong?
+Als u een nieuwe open source-bijdrager bent, kan het proces intimiderend zijn. Hoe vind je het juiste project? Wat als u niet weet hoe u moet coderen? Wat als er iets mis gaat?
-Not to worry! There are all sorts of ways to get involved with an open source project, and a few tips will help you get the most out of your experience.
+Geen zorgen! Er zijn allerlei manieren om betrokken te raken bij een open source-project, en een paar tips zullen u helpen het meeste uit uw ervaring te halen.
-### You don't have to contribute code
+### U hoeft geen code bij te dragen
-A common misconception about contributing to open source is that you need to contribute code. In fact, it's often the other parts of a project that are [most neglected or overlooked](https://github.com/blog/2195-the-shape-of-open-source). You'll do the project a _huge_ favor by offering to pitch in with these types of contributions!
+Een veel voorkomende misvatting over bijdragen aan open source is dat je code moet bijdragen. In feite zijn het vaak de andere delen van een project die [het meest worden verwaarloosd of over het hoofd gezien](https://github.com/blog/2195-the-shape-of-open-source). Je doet het project een _grote_ gunst door aan te bieden mee te werken met dit soort bijdragen!
- I’ve been renowned for my work on CocoaPods, but most people don’t know that I actually don’t do any real work on the CocoaPods tool itself. My time on the project is mostly spent doing things like documentation and working on branding.
+ Ik sta bekend om mijn werk aan CocoaPods, maar de meeste mensen weten niet dat ik eigenlijk geen echt werk aan de CocoaPods-tool zelf doe. Mijn tijd aan het project besteed ik voornamelijk aan zaken als documentatie en branding.
+
+ _I’ve been renowned for my work on CocoaPods, but most people don’t know that I actually don’t do any real work on the CocoaPods tool itself. My time on the project is mostly spent doing things like documentation and working on branding._
+
-— @orta, ["Moving to OSS by default"](https://academy.realm.io/posts/orta-therox-moving-to-oss-by-default/)
+— @orta, ["Standaard naar OSS gaan"](https://academy.realm.io/posts/orta-therox-moving-to-oss-by-default/)
-Even if you like to write code, other types of contributions are a great way to get involved with a project and meet other community members. Building those relationships will give you opportunities to work on other parts of the project.
+Zelfs als je graag code schrijft, zijn andere soorten bijdragen een geweldige manier om bij een project betrokken te raken en andere leden van de gemeenschap te ontmoeten. Door die relaties op te bouwen, krijg je de kans om aan andere delen van het project te werken.
- I first reached out to the Python development team (aka python-dev) when I emailed the mailing list on June 17, 2002 about accepting my patch. I quickly caught the open source bug, and decided to start curating email digests for the group. They gave me a great excuse to ask for clarifications about a topic, but more critically I was able to notice when someone pointed out something that needed fixing.
+ Ik nam voor het eerst contact op met het Python-ontwikkelingsteam (ook bekend als python-dev) toen ik de mailinglijst op 17 juni 2002 e-mailde over het accepteren van mijn patch. Ik ontdekte snel de open source-bug en besloot om e-mailsamenvattingen voor de groep te gaan beheren. Ze gaven me een geweldig excuus om opheldering over een onderwerp te vragen, maar kritischer merkte ik dat iemand op iets wees dat moest worden opgelost.
+
+ _I first reached out to the Python development team (aka python-dev) when I emailed the mailing list on June 17, 2002 about accepting my patch. I quickly caught the open source bug, and decided to start curating email digests for the group. They gave me a great excuse to ask for clarifications about a topic, but more critically I was able to notice when someone pointed out something that needed fixing._
+
— @brettcannon, ["Maintainer Stories"](https://github.com/open-source/stories/brettcannon)
-### Do you like planning events?
+### Houd je van het plannen van evenementen?
-* Organize workshops or meetups about the project, [like @fzamperin did for NodeSchool](https://github.com/nodeschool/organizers/issues/406)
-* Organize the project's conference (if they have one)
-* Help community members find the right conferences and submit proposals for speaking
+* Organiseer workshops of meetups over het project, [zoals @fzamperin deed voor NodeSchool](https://github.com/nodeschool/organizers/issues/406)
+* Organiseer de conferentie van het project (als ze er een hebben)
+* Help leden van de gemeenschap de juiste conferenties te vinden en presenteer voorstellen om te spreken
-### Do you like to design?
+### Houd je van ontwerpen?
-* Restructure layouts to improve the project's usability
-* Conduct user research to reorganize and refine the project's navigation or menus, [like Drupal suggests](https://www.drupal.org/community-initiatives/drupal-core/usability)
-* Put together a style guide to help the project have a consistent visual design
-* Create art for t-shirts or a new logo, [like hapi.js's contributors did](https://github.com/hapijs/contrib/issues/68)
+* Herstructureer lay-outs om de bruikbaarheid van het project te verbeteren
+* Voer gebruikersonderzoek uit om de navigatie of menu's van het project te reorganiseren en te verfijnen [zoals Drupal suggereert](https://www.drupal.org/community-initiatives/drupal-core/usability)
+* Stel een stijlgids samen om het project te helpen een consistent visueel ontwerp te hebben
+* Maak kunst voor t-shirts of een nieuw logo, [zoals de bijdragers van hapi.js deden](https://github.com/hapijs/contrib/issues/68)
-### Do you like to write?
+### Vind je het leuk om te schrijven?
-* Write and improve the project's documentation
-* Curate a folder of examples showing how the project is used
-* Start a newsletter for the project, or curate highlights from the mailing list
-* Write tutorials for the project, [like PyPA's contributors did](https://github.com/pypa/python-packaging-user-guide/issues/194)
-* Write a translation for the project's documentation
+* Schrijf en verbeter de projectdocumentatie
+* Beheer een map met voorbeelden die laten zien hoe het project wordt gebruikt
+* Start een nieuwsbrief voor het project of cureer hoogtepunten uit de mailinglijst
+* Schrijf tutorials voor het project, [zoals de bijdragers van PyPA](https://github.com/pypa/python-packaging-user-guide/issues/194)
+* Schrijf een vertaling voor de documentatie van het project
- Seriously, \[documentation\] is mega-important. The documentation so far has been great and has been a killer feature of Babel. There are sections that could certainly use some work and even the addition of a paragraph here or there is extremely appreciated.
+ Serieus, \[documentatie\] is enorm belangrijk. De documentatie tot nu toe was geweldig en was een geweldige eigenschap van Babel. Er zijn secties die zeker wat werk kunnen gebruiken en zelfs de toevoeging van een alinea hier of daar wordt enorm gewaardeerd.
+
+ _Seriously, \[documentation\] is mega-important. The documentation so far has been great and has been a killer feature of Babel. There are sections that could certainly use some work and even the addition of a paragraph here or there is extremely appreciated._
+
-— @kittens, ["Call for contributors"](https://github.com/babel/babel/issues/1347)
+— @kittens, ["Roep bijdragers op"](https://github.com/babel/babel/issues/1347)
-### Do you like organizing?
+### Houd je van organiseren?
-* Link to duplicate issues, and suggest new issue labels, to keep things organized
-* Go through open issues and suggest closing old ones, [like @nzakas did for ESLint](https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/6765)
-* Ask clarifying questions on recently opened issues to move the discussion forward
+* Link naar dubbele problemen en stel nieuwe labels voor om alles georganiseerd te houden
+* Doorloop openstaande issues en stel voor om oude te sluiten, [zoals @nzakas deed voor ESLint](https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/6765)
+* Stel verhelderende vragen over recent geopende kwesties om de discussie vooruit te helpen
-### Do you like to code?
+### Vind je het leuk om te coderen?
-* Find an open issue to tackle, [like @dianjin did for Leaflet](https://github.com/Leaflet/Leaflet/issues/4528#issuecomment-216520560)
-* Ask if you can help write a new feature
-* Automate project setup
-* Improve tooling and testing
+* Zoek een openstaand probleem om aan te pakken, [zoals @dianjin deed voor Leaflet](https://github.com/Leaflet/Leaflet/issues/4528#issuecomment-216520560)
+* Vraag of u kunt helpen bij het schrijven van een nieuwe functie
+* Automatiseer het opzetten van projecten
+* Verbeter tooling en testen
-### Do you like helping people?
+### Vind je het leuk om mensen te helpen?
-* Answer questions about the project on e.g., Stack Overflow ([like this Postgres example](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18664074/getting-error-peer-authentication-failed-for-user-postgres-when-trying-to-ge)) or Reddit
-* Answer questions for people on open issues
-* Help moderate the discussion boards or conversation channels
+* Beantwoord vragen over het project op bijvoorbeeld Stack Overflow ([zoals dit Postgres-voorbeeld] (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18664074/getting-error-peer-authentication-failed-for-user-postgres-when-trying-to-ge)) of Reddit
+* Beantwoord vragen voor mensen over openstaande kwesties
+* Help de discussieborden of gesprekskanalen te modereren
-### Do you like helping others code?
+### Vind je het leuk om anderen te helpen bij het coderen?
-* Review code on other people's submissions
-* Write tutorials for how a project can be used
-* Offer to mentor another contributor, [like @ereichert did for @bronzdoc on Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/book/issues/123#issuecomment-238049666)
+* Beoordeel code inzendingen van andere mensen
+* Schrijf tutorials over hoe een project kan worden gebruikt
+* Aanbieding om een andere bijdrager te begeleiden, [zoals @ereichert deed voor @bronzdoc op Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/book/issues/123#issuecomment-238049666)
-### You don't just have to work on software projects!
+### U hoeft niet alleen aan softwareprojecten te werken!
-While "open source" often refers to software, you can collaborate on just about anything. There are books, recipes, lists, and classes that get developed as open source projects.
+Hoewel "open source" vaak verwijst naar software, kunt u aan vrijwel alles samenwerken. Er zijn boeken, recepten, lijsten en klassen die worden ontwikkeld als open source-projecten.
-For example:
+Bijvoorbeeld:
-* @sindresorhus curates a [list of "awesome" lists](https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome)
-* @h5bp maintains a [list of potential interview questions](https://github.com/h5bp/Front-end-Developer-Interview-Questions) for front-end developer candidates
-* @stuartlynn and @nicole-a-tesla made a [collection of fun facts about puffins](https://github.com/stuartlynn/puffin_facts)
+* @sindresorhus beheert een [lijst met "geweldige" lijsten](https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome)
+* @h5bp houdt een [lijst met potentiële interviewvragen](https://github.com/h5bp/Front-end-Developer-Interview-Questions) bij voor front-end ontwikkelaarskandidaten
+* @stuartlynn en @nicole-a-tesla hebben een [verzameling leuke weetjes over papegaaiduikers](https://github.com/stuartlynn/puffin_facts) gemaakt
-Even if you're a software developer, working on a documentation project can help you get started in open source. It's often less intimidating to work on projects that don't involve code, and the process of collaboration will build your confidence and experience.
+Zelfs als u een softwareontwikkelaar bent, kan het werken aan een documentatieproject u helpen aan de slag te gaan in open source. Het is vaak minder intimiderend om aan projecten te werken waarbij geen code wordt gebruikt, en het samenwerkingsproces zal uw vertrouwen en ervaring vergroten.
## Je oriënteren op een nieuw project
- If you go to an issue tracker and things seem confusing, it's not just you. These tools require a lot of implicit knowledge, but people can help you navigate it and you can ask them questions.
+ Als je naar een issue-tracker gaat en de dingen verwarrend lijken, ben jij het niet alleen. Deze tools vereisen veel impliciete kennis, maar mensen kunnen je helpen er doorheen te navigeren en je kunt ze vragen stellen.
-— @shaunagm, ["How to Contribute to Open Source"](https://readwrite.com/2014/10/10/open-source-diversity-how-to-contribute/)
+— @shaunagm, ["Hoe u kunt bijdragen aan Open Source"](https://readwrite.com/2014/10/10/open-source-diversity-how-to-contribute/)
-For anything more than a typo fix, contributing to open source is like walking up to a group of strangers at a party. If you start talking about llamas, while they were deep in a discussion about goldfish, they'll probably look at you a little strangely.
+Voor meer dan een typefout is bijdragen aan open source net zoiets als naar een groep vreemden lopen op een feestje. Als je over lama's begint te praten, terwijl ze diep in een discussie over goudvissen zaten, zullen ze je waarschijnlijk een beetje vreemd aankijken.
-Before jumping in blindly with your own suggestions, start by learning how to read the room. Doing so increases the chances that your ideas will be noticed and heard.
+Voordat u blindelings met uw eigen suggesties begint, moet u eerst leren hoe u de kamer moet lezen. Hierdoor vergroot u de kans dat uw ideeën worden opgemerkt en gehoord.
-### Anatomy of an open source project
+### Anatomie van een open source-project
-Every open source community is different.
+Elke open source-community is anders.
-Spending years on one open source project means you've gotten to know one open source project. Move to a different project, and you might find the vocabulary, norms, and communication styles are completely different.
+Jarenlang aan één open source-project besteden, betekent dat je één open source-project hebt leren kennen. Ga naar een ander project en je zult misschien ontdekken dat de woordenschat, normen en communicatiestijlen totaal verschillend zijn.
-That said, many open source projects follow a similar organizational structure. Understanding the different community roles and overall process will help you get quickly oriented to any new project.
+Dat gezegd hebbende, veel open source-projecten volgen een vergelijkbare organisatiestructuur. Als u de verschillende rollen van de gemeenschap en het algehele proces begrijpt, kunt u zich snel op elk nieuw project oriënteren.
-A typical open source project has the following types of people:
+Een typisch open source-project heeft de volgende soorten mensen:
-* **Author:** The person/s or organization that created the project
-* **Owner:** The person/s who has administrative ownership over the organization or repository (not always the same as the original author)
-* **Maintainers:** Contributors who are responsible for driving the vision and managing the organizational aspects of the project (They may also be authors or owners of the project.)
-* **Contributors:** Everyone who has contributed something back to the project
-* **Community Members:** People who use the project. They might be active in conversations or express their opinion on the project's direction
+* **Auteur:** De persoon/personen of organisatie die het project heeft gemaakt
+* **Eigenaar:** De persoon/personen die het administratieve eigendom hebben over de organisatie of opslagplaats (niet altijd dezelfde als de oorspronkelijke auteur)
+* **Beheerders:** medewerkers die verantwoordelijk zijn voor het aansturen van de visie en het managen van de organisatorische aspecten van het project (ze kunnen ook auteurs of eigenaren van het project zijn.)
+* **Bijdragers:** Iedereen die iets heeft bijgedragen aan het project
+* **Communityleden:** Mensen die het project gebruiken. Ze kunnen actief zijn in gesprekken of hun mening geven over de richting van het project
-Bigger projects may also have subcommittees or working groups focused on different tasks, such as tooling, triage, community moderation, and event organizing. Look on a project's website for a "team" page, or in the repository for governance documentation, to find this information.
+Grotere projecten kunnen ook subcommissies of werkgroepen hebben die zich richten op verschillende taken, zoals tooling, triage, community-moderatie en het organiseren van evenementen. Kijk op de website van een project voor een "team"-pagina of in de repository voor bestuursdocumentatie om deze informatie te vinden.
-A project also has documentation. These files are usually listed in the top level of a repository.
+Een project heeft ook documentatie. Deze bestanden worden meestal op het hoogste niveau van een repository vermeld.
-* **LICENSE:** By definition, every open source project must have an [open source license](https://choosealicense.com). If the project does not have a license, it is not open source.
-* **README:** The README is the instruction manual that welcomes new community members to the project. It explains why the project is useful and how to get started.
-* **CONTRIBUTING:** Whereas READMEs help people _use_ the project, contributing docs help people _contribute_ to the project. It explains what types of contributions are needed and how the process works. While not every project has a CONTRIBUTING file, its presence signals that this is a welcoming project to contribute to.
-* **CODE_OF_CONDUCT:** The code of conduct sets ground rules for participants' behavior associated and helps to facilitate a friendly, welcoming environment. While not every project has a CODE_OF_CONDUCT file, its presence signals that this is a welcoming project to contribute to.
-* **Other documentation:** There might be additional documentation, such as tutorials, walkthroughs, or governance policies, especially on bigger projects.
+* **LICENSE:** Per definitie moet elk open source project een [open source licentie](https://choosealicense.com) hebben. Als het project geen licentie heeft, is het geen open source.
+* **README:** De README is de instructiehandleiding die nieuwe gemeenschapsleden verwelkomt bij het project. Het legt uit waarom het project nuttig is en hoe u ermee kunt beginnen.
+* **CONTRIBUTORS:** Terwijl README's mensen helpen het project te _gebruiken_, helpen bijdragende documenten mensen _bij te dragen_ aan het project. Het legt uit welke soorten bijdragen nodig zijn en hoe het proces werkt. Hoewel niet elk project een CONTRIBUTING-bestand heeft, geeft de aanwezigheid ervan aan dat dit een welkom project is om aan bij te dragen.
+* **CODE_OF_CONDUCT:** De gedragscode stelt basisregels vast voor het bijbehorende gedrag van deelnemers en helpt om een vriendelijke, gastvrije omgeving mogelijk te maken. Hoewel niet elk project een CODE_OF_CONDUCT-bestand heeft, geeft de aanwezigheid ervan aan dat dit een welkom project is om aan bij te dragen.
+* **Andere documentatie:** Er kan aanvullende documentatie zijn, zoals tutorials, walkthroughs of governance-beleid, vooral bij grotere projecten.
-Finally, open source projects use the following tools to organize discussion. Reading through the archives will give you a good picture of how the community thinks and works.
+Ten slotte gebruiken open source-projecten de volgende tools om discussies te organiseren. Als je de archieven doorleest, krijg je een goed beeld van hoe de gemeenschap denkt en werkt.
-* **Issue tracker:** Where people discuss issues related to the project.
-* **Pull requests:** Where people discuss and review changes that are in progress.
-* **Discussion forums or mailing lists:** Some projects may use these channels for conversational topics (for example, _"How do I..."_ or _"What do you think about..."_ instead of bug reports or feature requests). Others use the issue tracker for all conversations.
-* **Synchronous chat channel:** Some projects use chat channels (such as Slack or IRC) for casual conversation, collaboration, and quick exchanges.
+* **Issue tracker:** waar mensen problemen bespreken die verband houden met het project.
+* **Pull-verzoeken:** waar mensen wijzigingen bespreken en beoordelen die aan de gang zijn.
+* **Discussieforums of mailinglijsten** Sommige projecten kunnen deze kanalen gebruiken voor gespreksonderwerpen (bijvoorbeeld _"Hoe kan ik ..."_ of _"Waar denk je aan ..."_ in plaats van bugs rapporten of functieverzoeken). Anderen gebruiken de issue tracker voor alle gesprekken.
+* **Synchroon chatkanaal:** Sommige projecten gebruiken chatkanalen (zoals Slack of IRC) voor informele gesprekken, samenwerking en snelle uitwisselingen.
## Een project vinden om aan bij te dragen
-Now that you've figured out how open source projects work, it's time to find a project to contribute to!
+Nu je weet hoe open source-projecten werken, is het tijd om een project te vinden waaraan je kunt bijdragen!
-If you've never contributed to open source before, take some advice from U.S. President John F. Kennedy, who once said, _"Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country."_
+Als je nog nooit eerder hebt bijgedragen aan open source, neem dan wat advies in van de Amerikaanse president John F. Kennedy, die ooit zei: _"Vraag niet wat uw land voor u kan doen - vraag wat u voor uw land kunt doen."_
-Contributing to open source happens at all levels, across projects. You don't need to overthink what exactly your first contribution will be, or how it will look.
+Bijdragen aan open source gebeurt op alle niveaus, over projecten heen. U hoeft niet te veel na te denken over wat uw eerste bijdrage precies zal zijn, of hoe deze eruit zal zien.
-Instead, start by thinking about the projects you already use, or want to use. The projects you'll actively contribute to are the ones you find yourself coming back to.
+Begin in plaats daarvan met nadenken over de projecten die u al gebruikt of wilt gebruiken. De projecten waaraan u actief bijdraagt, zijn de projecten waar u naar terugkeert.
-Within those projects, whenever you catch yourself thinking that something could be better or different, act on your instinct.
+Wanneer je binnen die projecten merkt dat je denkt dat iets beter of anders kan, handel dan naar je instinct.
-Open source isn't an exclusive club; it's made by people just like you. "Open source" is just a fancy term for treating the world's problems as fixable.
+Open source is geen exclusieve club; het is gemaakt door mensen zoals jij. "Open source" is gewoon een mooie term om de problemen van de wereld als herstelbaar te behandelen.
-You might scan a README and find a broken link or a typo. Or you're a new user and you noticed something is broken, or an issue that you think should really be in the documentation. Instead of ignoring it and moving on, or asking someone else to fix it, see whether you can help out by pitching in. That's what open source is all about!
+U kunt een README lezen en een incorrecte link of typefout vinden. Of je bent een nieuwe gebruiker en je hebt gemerkt dat er iets kapot is, of een probleem waarvan je denkt dat het echt in de documentatie zou moeten staan. In plaats van het te negeren en verder te gaan, of iemand anders te vragen om het op te lossen, kijk of je kunt helpen door mee te doen. Dat is waar het bij open source om draait!
-> [28% of casual contributions](https://www.igor.pro.br/publica/papers/saner2016.pdf) to open source are documentation, such as a typo fix, reformatting, or writing a translation.
+> [28% van de losse bijdragen](https://www.igor.pro.br/publica/papers/saner2016.pdf) aan open source zijn documentatie, zoals een typefout, herformattering of het schrijven van een vertaling.
-If you're looking for existing issues you can fix, every open source project has a `/contribute` page that highlights beginner-friendly issues you can start out with. Navigate to the main page of the repository on GitHub, and add `/contribute` at the end of the URL (for example [`https://github.com/facebook/react/contribute`](https://github.com/facebook/react/contribute)).
+Als u op zoek bent naar bestaande problemen die u kunt oplossen, heeft elk open source-project een '/ contribute'-pagina die beginnersvriendelijke problemen belicht waarmee u kunt beginnen. Navigeer naar de hoofdpagina van de repository op GitHub en voeg '/ contribute' toe aan het einde van de URL (bijvoorbeeld [`https://github.com/facebook/react/contribute`](https://github.com/facebook/contribute/contribute)).
-You can also use one of the following resources to help you discover and contribute to new projects:
+U kunt ook een van de volgende bronnen gebruiken om u te helpen bij het ontdekken van en bijdragen aan nieuwe projecten:
* [GitHub Explore](https://github.com/explore/)
* [Open Source Friday](https://opensourcefriday.com)
@@ -232,43 +243,43 @@ You can also use one of the following resources to help you discover and contrib
* [First Contributions](https://firstcontributions.github.io)
* [SourceSort](https://www.sourcesort.com/)
-### A checklist before you contribute
+### Een checklist voordat u bijdraagt
-When you've found a project you'd like to contribute to, do a quick scan to make sure that the project is suitable for accepting contributions. Otherwise, your hard work may never get a response.
+Als je een project hebt gevonden waaraan je zou willen bijdragen, doe dan een snelle scan om er zeker van te zijn dat het project geschikt is om bijdragen te accepteren. Anders krijgt uw harde werk misschien nooit een reactie.
-Here's a handy checklist to evaluate whether a project is good for new contributors.
+Hier is een handige checklist om te evalueren of een project goed is voor nieuwe bijdragers.
-**Meets the definition of open source**
+**Voldoet aan de definitie van open source**
- Does it have a license? Usually, there is a file called LICENSE in the root of the repository.
+ Heeft het een licentie? Gewoonlijk is er een bestand met de naam LICENSE in de root van de repository.
-**Project actively accepts contributions**
+**Project accepteert actief bijdragen**
-Look at the commit activity on the master branch. On GitHub, you can see this information on a repository's homepage.
+Kijk naar de commit-activiteit op de main branch. Op GitHub kun je deze informatie zien op de startpagina van een repository.
- When was the latest commit?
+ Wanneer was de laatste commit?
- How many contributors does the project have?
+ Hoeveel bijdragers heeft het project?
- How often do people commit? (On GitHub, you can find this by clicking "Commits" in the top bar.)
+ Hoe vaak commiten mensen? (Op GitHub kun je dit vinden door op "Commits" in de bovenste balk te klikken.)
@@ -277,259 +288,268 @@ Next, look at the project's issues.
- How many open issues are there?
+ Hoeveel openstaande issues zijn er?
- Do maintainers respond quickly to issues when they are opened?
+ Reageren beheerders snel op issues wanneer ze worden geopend?
- Is there active discussion on the issues?
+ Is er een actieve discussie over de issues?
- Are the issues recent?
+ Zijn de issues recent?
- Are issues getting closed? (On GitHub, click the "closed" tab on the Issues page to see closed issues.)
+ Worden problemen gesloten? (Klik op GitHub op het tabblad "closed" op de pagina Issues om gesloten problemen te zien.)
-Now do the same for the project's pull requests.
+Doe nu hetzelfde voor de pull-verzoeken van het project.
- How many open pull requests are there?
+ Hoeveel openstaande pull-aanvragen zijn er?
- Do maintainers respond quickly to pull requests when they are opened?
+ Reageren beheerders snel op pull-verzoeken wanneer ze worden geopend?
- Is there active discussion on the pull requests?
+ Is er actieve discussie over de pull-aanvragen?
- Are the pull requests recent?
+ Zijn de pull-aanvragen recent?
- How recently were any pull requests merged? (On GitHub, click the "closed" tab on the Pull Requests page to see closed PRs.)
+ Hoe recent zijn pull-verzoeken samengevoegd? (Klik op GitHub op het tabblad "closed" op de pagina Pull Requests om gesloten PR's te zien.)
-**Project is welcoming**
+**Project is gastvrij**
-A project that is friendly and welcoming signals that they will be receptive to new contributors.
+Een project dat vriendelijk en gastvrij is, geeft aan dat ze ontvankelijk zullen zijn voor nieuwe bijdragers.
- Do the maintainers respond helpfully to questions in issues?
+ Reageren de beheerders behulpzaam op vragen in problemen?
- Are people friendly in the issues, discussion forum, and chat (for example, IRC or Slack)?
+ Zijn mensen vriendelijk in de problemen, het discussieforum en de chat (bijvoorbeeld IRC of Slack)?
- Do pull requests get reviewed?
+ Worden pull-aanvragen beoordeeld?
- Do maintainers thank people for their contributions?
+ Bedanken onderhouders mensen voor hun bijdragen?
- Whenever you see a long thread, spot check responses from core developers coming late in the thread. Are they summarizing constructively, and taking steps to bring the thread to a decision while remaining polite? If you see a lot of flame wars going on, that's often a sign that energy is going into argument instead of into development.
+ Elke keer dat je een lange thread ziet, controleer dan de reacties van kernontwikkelaars die laat in de thread komen. Vatten ze constructief samen en ondernemen ze stappen om de rode draad tot een beslissing te brengen terwijl ze beleefd blijven? Als je veel vlammenoorlogen ziet plaatsvinden, is dat vaak een teken dat energie in discussie gaat in plaats van in ontwikkeling.
+
+ _Whenever you see a long thread, spot check responses from core developers coming late in the thread. Are they summarizing constructively, and taking steps to bring the thread to a decision while remaining polite? If you see a lot of flame wars going on, that's often a sign that energy is going into argument instead of into development._
+
-— @kfogel, [_Producing OSS_](https://producingoss.com/en/evaluating-oss-projects.html)
+— @kfogel, [_OSS Produceren_](https://producingoss.com/en/evaluating-oss-projects.html)
## Hoe u een bijdrage kunt indienen
-You've found a project you like, and you're ready to make a contribution. Finally! Here's how to get your contribution in the right way.
+Je hebt een project gevonden dat je leuk vindt en je bent klaar om een bijdrage te leveren. Tenslotte! Hier leest u hoe u uw bijdrage op de juiste manier krijgt.
-### Communicating effectively
+### Effectief communiceren
-Whether you're a one-time contributor or trying to join a community, working with others is one of the most important skills you'll develop in open source.
+Of je nu een eenmalige bijdrage levert of probeert lid te worden van een community, samenwerken met anderen is een van de belangrijkste vaardigheden die je in open source zult ontwikkelen.
- \[As a new contributor,\] I quickly realized I had to ask questions if I wanted to be able to close the issue. I skimmed through the code base. Once I had some sense of what was going on, I asked for more direction. And voilà! I was able to solve the issue after getting all the relevant details I needed.
+ \[Als nieuwe bijdrager\] realiseerde ik me al snel dat ik vragen moest stellen als ik het probleem wilde sluiten. Ik bladerde door de codebasis. Toen ik eenmaal een idee had van wat er aan de hand was, vroeg ik om meer richting. En voilà! Ik kon het probleem oplossen nadat ik alle relevante details had gekregen die ik nodig had.
+
+ _\[As a new contributor,\] I quickly realized I had to ask questions if I wanted to be able to close the issue. I skimmed through the code base. Once I had some sense of what was going on, I asked for more direction. And voilà! I was able to solve the issue after getting all the relevant details I needed._
+
-— @shubheksha, [A Beginner's Very Bumpy Journey Through The World of Open Source](https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/a-beginners-very-bumpy-journey-through-the-world-of-open-source-4d108d540b39/)
+— @shubheksha, [Een hobbelige reis voor beginners door de wereld van open source](https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/a-beginners-very-bumpy-journey-through-the-world-of-open-source-4d108d540b39/)
-Before you open an issue or pull request, or ask a question in chat, keep these points in mind to help your ideas come across effectively.
+Houd deze punten in gedachten voordat u een probleem of pull-aanvraag opent of een vraag stelt in de chat, zodat uw ideeën effectief overkomen.
-**Give context.** Help others get quickly up to speed. If you're running into an error, explain what you're trying to do and how to reproduce it. If you're suggesting a new idea, explain why you think it'd be useful to the project (not just to you!).
+**Geef context.** Help anderen om snel aan de slag te gaan. Als u een fout tegenkomt, leg dan uit wat u probeert te doen en hoe u deze kunt reproduceren. Als je een nieuw idee voorstelt, leg dan uit waarom je denkt dat het nuttig zou zijn voor het project (niet alleen voor jou!).
-> 😇 _"X doesn't happen when I do Y"_
+> 😇 _"X gebeurt niet wanneer ik Y doe"_
>
-> 😢 _"X is broken! Please fix it."_
+> 😢 _"X is kapot! Los het probleem op."_
-**Do your homework beforehand.** It's OK not to know things, but show that you tried. Before asking for help, be sure to check a project's README, documentation, issues (open or closed), mailing list, and search the internet for an answer. People will appreciate when you demonstrate that you're trying to learn.
+**Maak van tevoren je huiswerk.** Het is oké om dingen niet te weten, maar laat zien dat je het geprobeerd hebt. Voordat u om hulp vraagt, moet u de README, documentatie, problemen (open of gesloten), mailinglijst van een project raadplegen en op internet naar een antwoord zoeken. Mensen zullen het waarderen als je laat zien dat je probeert te leren.
-> 😇 _"I'm not sure how to implement X. I checked the help docs and didn't find any mentions."_
+> 😇 _"Ik weet niet zeker hoe ik X moet implementeren. Ik heb de helpdocumenten gecontroleerd en geen vermeldingen gevonden."_
>
-> 😢 _"How do I X?"_
+> 😢 _"Hoe kan ik X?"_
-**Keep requests short and direct.** Much like sending an email, every contribution, no matter how simple or helpful, requires someone else's review. Many projects have more incoming requests than people available to help. Be concise. You will increase the chance that someone will be able to help you.
+**Houd verzoeken kort en direct.** Net als bij het verzenden van een e-mail, vereist elke bijdrage, hoe eenvoudig of nuttig ook, de beoordeling van iemand anders. Veel projecten hebben meer inkomende verzoeken dan mensen die beschikbaar zijn om te helpen. Wees beknopt. Je vergroot de kans dat iemand je kan helpen.
-> 😇 _"I'd like to write an API tutorial."_
+> 😇 _"Ik zou graag een API-tutorial willen schrijven."_
>
-> 😢 _"I was driving down the highway the other day and stopped for gas, and then I had this amazing idea for something we should be doing, but before I explain that, let me show you..."_
+> 😢 _"Ik reed onlangs over de snelweg en stopte om te tanken, en toen had ik een geweldig idee voor iets dat we zouden moeten doen, maar voordat ik dat uitleg, wil ik je laten zien ..."_
-**Keep all communication public.** Although it's tempting, don't reach out to maintainers privately unless you need to share sensitive information (such as a security issue or serious conduct violation). When you keep the conversation public, more people can learn and benefit from your exchange. Discussions can be, in themselves, contributions.
+**Houd alle communicatie openbaar.** Hoewel het verleidelijk is, moet u niet privé contact opnemen met beheerders, tenzij u gevoelige informatie moet delen (zoals een beveiligingsprobleem of een ernstige schending van het gedrag). Als u het gesprek openbaar houdt, kunnen meer mensen leren en profiteren van uw uitwisseling. Discussies kunnen op zichzelf bijdragen zijn.
-> 😇 _(as a comment) "@-maintainer Hi there! How should we proceed on this PR?"_
+> 😇 _(als commentaar) "@-maintainer Hallo! Hoe gaan we verder met deze PR?"_
>
-> 😢 _(as an email) "Hey there, sorry to bother you over email, but I was wondering if you've had a chance to review my PR"_
+> 😢 _(als e-mail) "Hallo, sorry dat ik je stoor via e-mail, maar ik vroeg me af of je de kans hebt gehad om mijn PR te herzien"_
-**It's okay to ask questions (but be patient!).** Everybody was new to the project at some point, and even experienced contributors need to get up to speed when they look at a new project. By the same token, even longtime maintainers are not always familiar with every part of the project. Show them the same patience that you'd want them to show to you.
+**Het is oké om vragen te stellen (maar wees geduldig!).** Iedereen was op een gegeven moment nieuw in het project en zelfs ervaren bijdragers moeten op de hoogte zijn als ze naar een nieuw project kijken. Op dezelfde manier zijn zelfs langdurige beheerders niet altijd bekend met elk onderdeel van het project. Toon ze hetzelfde geduld dat je zou willen dat ze je tonen.
-> 😇 _"Thanks for looking into this error. I followed your suggestions. Here's the output."_
+> 😇 _"Bedankt voor het onderzoeken van deze fout. Ik heb uw suggesties gevolgd. Hier is de uitvoer."_
>
-> 😢 _"Why can't you fix my problem? Isn't this your project?"_
+> 😢 _"Waarom kun je mijn probleem niet oplossen? Is dit niet jouw project?"_
-**Respect community decisions.** Your ideas may differ from the community's priorities or vision. They may offer feedback or decide not to pursue your idea. While you should discuss and look for compromise, maintainers have to live with your decision longer than you will. If you disagree with their direction, you can always work on your own fork or start your own project.
+**Respecteer gemeenschapsbeslissingen.** Uw ideeën kunnen verschillen van de prioriteiten of visie van de gemeenschap. Ze kunnen feedback geven of besluiten uw idee niet na te streven. Terwijl u moet discussiëren en zoeken naar een compromis, moeten beheerders langer met uw beslissing leven dan u wilt. Als je het niet eens bent met hun richting, kun je altijd aan je eigen vork werken of je eigen project starten.
-> 😇 _"I'm disappointed you can't support my use case, but as you've explained it only affects a minor portion of users, I understand why. Thanks for listening."_
+> 😇 _"Ik ben teleurgesteld dat je mijn use case niet kunt ondersteunen, maar zoals je hebt uitgelegd, heeft het slechts invloed op een klein deel van de gebruikers, ik begrijp waarom. Bedankt voor het luisteren."_
>
-> 😢 _"Why won't you support my use case? This is unacceptable!"_
+> 😢 _"Waarom steun je mijn use case niet? Dit is onaanvaardbaar!"_
-**Above all, keep it classy.** Open source is made up of collaborators from all over the world. Context gets lost across languages, cultures, geographies, and time zones. In addition, written communication makes it harder to convey a tone or mood. Assume good intentions in these conversations. It's fine to politely push back on an idea, ask for more context, or further clarify your position. Just try to leave the internet a better place than when you found it.
+**Houd het vooral netjes.** Open source bestaat uit medewerkers van over de hele wereld. Context gaat verloren in talen, culturen, geografische gebieden en tijdzones. Bovendien maakt schriftelijke communicatie het moeilijker om een toon of stemming over te brengen. Ga in deze gesprekken uit van goede bedoelingen. Het is prima om beleefd terug te komen op een idee, om meer context te vragen of je standpunt verder te verduidelijken. Probeer gewoon het internet op een betere plek achter te laten dan toen u het vond.
-### Gathering context
+### Context verzamelen
-Before doing anything, do a quick check to make sure your idea hasn't been discussed elsewhere. Skim the project's README, issues (open and closed), mailing list, and Stack Overflow. You don't have to spend hours going through everything, but a quick search for a few key terms goes a long way.
+Voordat u iets doet, controleert u eerst of uw idee nergens anders is besproken. Bekijk de README, problemen (open en gesloten), mailinglijst en Stack Overflow van het project. Je hoeft geen uren te besteden aan het doornemen van alles, maar een snelle zoektocht naar een paar sleutelbegrippen gaat ver.
-If you can't find your idea elsewhere, you're ready to make a move. If the project is on GitHub, you'll likely communicate by opening an issue or pull request:
+Als u uw idee nergens anders kunt vinden, bent u klaar om een stap te zetten. Als het project op GitHub staat, communiceer je waarschijnlijk door een issue of pull request te openen:
-* **Issues** are like starting a conversation or discussion
-* **Pull requests** are for starting work on a solution
-* **For lightweight communication,** such as a clarifying or how-to question, try asking on Stack Overflow, IRC, Slack, or other chat channels, if the project has one
+* **Problemen/Issues** zijn als het starten van een gesprek of discussie
+* **Pull-aanvragen** zijn bedoeld om aan een oplossing te beginnen
+* **Voor eenvoudige communicatie**, zoals een verhelderende of how-to-vraag, kunt u vragen stellen op Stack Overflow, IRC, Slack of andere chatkanalen, als het project er een heeft
-Before you open an issue or pull request, check the project's contributing docs (usually a file called CONTRIBUTING, or in the README), to see whether you need to include anything specific. For example, they may ask that you follow a template, or require that you use tests.
+Voordat je een issue of pull request opent, controleer je de bijdragende documenten van het project (meestal een bestand genaamd CONTRIBUTING, of in de README), om te zien of je iets specifieks moet opnemen. Ze kunnen u bijvoorbeeld vragen een sjabloon te volgen, of eisen dat u tests gebruikt.
-If you want to make a substantial contribution, open an issue to ask before working on it. It's helpful to watch the project for a while (on GitHub, [you can click "Watch"](https://help.github.com/articles/watching-repositories/) to be notified of all conversations), and get to know community members, before doing work that might not get accepted.
+Als je een substantiële bijdrage wilt leveren, open dan een vraagstuk voordat je eraan gaat werken. Het is handig om het project een tijdje te bekijken (op GitHub, [u kunt op "Bekijken" klikken](https://help.github.com/articles/watching-repositories/) om op de hoogte te worden gehouden van alle gesprekken), en ken de leden van de gemeenschap voordat u werk gaat doen dat misschien niet wordt geaccepteerd.
- You'll learn a lot from taking a single project you actively use, "watching" it on GitHub and reading every issue and PR.
+ Je leert veel door een enkel project te nemen dat je actief gebruikt, het op GitHub te "bekijken" en elk nummer en PR te lezen.
+
+ _You'll learn a lot from taking a single project you actively use, "watching" it on GitHub and reading every issue and PR._
+
-— @gaearon [on joining projects](https://twitter.com/dan_abramov/status/819555257055322112)
+— @gaearon [over deelname aan projecten](https://twitter.com/dan_abramov/status/819555257055322112)
-### Opening an issue
+### Een issue openen
-You should usually open an issue in the following situations:
+U zou gewoonlijk een probleem (_issue_) moeten openen in de volgende situaties:
-* Report an error you can't solve yourself
-* Discuss a high-level topic or idea (for example, community, vision or policies)
-* Propose a new feature or other project idea
+* Meld een fout die u niet zelf kunt oplossen
+* Bespreek een onderwerp of idee op hoog niveau (bijvoorbeeld gemeenschap, visie of beleid)
+* Stel een nieuwe functie of ander projectidee voor
-Tips for communicating on issues:
+Tips voor het communiceren over problemen:
-* **If you see an open issue that you want to tackle,** comment on the issue to let people know you're on it. That way, people are less likely to duplicate your work.
-* **If an issue was opened a while ago,** it's possible that it's being addressed somewhere else, or has already been resolved, so comment to ask for confirmation before starting work.
-* **If you opened an issue, but figured out the answer later on your own,** comment on the issue to let people know, then close the issue. Even documenting that outcome is a contribution to the project.
+* **Als u een openstaand probleem ziet dat u wilt aanpakken,** geef dan commentaar op het probleem om mensen te laten weten dat u ermee bezig bent. Op die manier is de kans kleiner dat mensen uw werk dupliceren.
+* **Als een probleem een tijdje geleden is geopend,** is het mogelijk dat het ergens anders wordt aangepakt of al is opgelost, dus reageer om bevestiging te vragen voordat u aan het werk gaat.
+* **Als je een probleem hebt geopend, maar het antwoord later zelf hebt bedacht,** geef dan commentaar op het probleem om mensen dit te laten weten en sluit het probleem vervolgens. Zelfs het documenteren van die uitkomst is een bijdrage aan het project.
-### Opening a pull request
+### Een pull-verzoek openen
-You should usually open a pull request in the following situations:
+U moet gewoonlijk een pull-aanvraag openen in de volgende situaties:
-* Submit trivial fixes (for example, a typo, a broken link or an obvious error)
-* Start work on a contribution that was already asked for, or that you've already discussed, in an issue
+* Voer triviale reparaties in (bijvoorbeeld een typefout, een verbroken link of een duidelijke fout)
+* Ga aan de slag met een bijdrage waar al om is gevraagd, of die je al hebt besproken in een issue
-A pull request doesn't have to represent finished work. It's usually better to open a pull request early on, so others can watch or give feedback on your progress. Just mark it as a "WIP" (Work in Progress) in the subject line. You can always add more commits later.
+Een pull-verzoek hoeft niet het voltooide werk te vertegenwoordigen. Het is meestal beter om vroegtijdig een pull-verzoek te openen, zodat anderen uw voortgang kunnen bekijken of feedback kunnen geven. Markeer het gewoon als een "WIP" (Work in Progress) in de onderwerpregel. Je kunt later altijd meer commits toevoegen.
-If the project is on GitHub, here's how to submit a pull request:
+Als het project op GitHub staat, kun je als volgt een pull-aanvraag indienen:
-* **[Fork the repository](https://guides.github.com/activities/forking/)** and clone it locally. Connect your local to the original "upstream" repository by adding it as a remote. Pull in changes from "upstream" often so that you stay up to date so that when you submit your pull request, merge conflicts will be less likely. (See more detailed instructions [here](https://help.github.com/articles/syncing-a-fork/).)
-* **[Create a branch](https://guides.github.com/introduction/flow/)** for your edits.
-* **Reference any relevant issues** or supporting documentation in your PR (for example, "Closes #37.")
-* **Include screenshots of the before and after** if your changes include differences in HTML/CSS. Drag and drop the images into the body of your pull request.
-* **Test your changes!** Run your changes against any existing tests if they exist and create new ones when needed. Whether tests exist or not, make sure your changes don't break the existing project.
-* **Contribute in the style of the project** to the best of your abilities. This may mean using indents, semi-colons or comments differently than you would in your own repository, but makes it easier for the maintainer to merge, others to understand and maintain in the future.
+* **[Fork the repository](https://guides.github.com/activities/forking/)** en kloon het lokaal. Verbind uw locale met de originele "upstream" repository door deze toe te voegen als een remote. Haal vaak wijzigingen van "upstream" binnen, zodat u up-to-date blijft, zodat wanneer u uw pull-verzoek indient, samenvoegingsconflicten minder waarschijnlijk zijn. (Zie meer gedetailleerde instructies [hier](https://help.github.com/articles/syncing-a-fork/).)
+* **[Maak een branch aan](https://guides.github.com/introduction/flow/)** voor uw bewerkingen.
+* **Verwijs naar relevante problemen (_issues_)** of ondersteunende documentatie in uw PR (bijvoorbeeld 'Closes #37'.)
+* **Voeg schermafbeeldingen toe van de voor en na** als uw wijzigingen verschillen in HTML / CSS bevatten. Sleep de afbeeldingen naar de hoofdtekst van uw pull-aanvraag.
+* **Test uw wijzigingen!** Voer uw wijzigingen uit met bestaande tests als deze bestaan en maak nieuwe aan als dat nodig is. Of er tests bestaan of niet, zorg ervoor dat uw wijzigingen het bestaande project niet verstoren.
+* **Draag zo goed mogelijk bij in de stijl van het project**. Dit kan betekenen dat u inspringingen, puntkomma's of commentaren anders moet gebruiken dan in uw eigen repository, maar het maakt het gemakkelijker voor de onderhouder om samen te voegen, zodat anderen het begrijpen en onderhouden in de toekomst.
-If this is your first pull request, check out [Make a Pull Request](http://makeapullrequest.com/), which @kentcdodds created as a walkthrough video tutorial. You can also practice making a pull request in the [First Contributions](https://github.com/Roshanjossey/first-contributions) repository, created by @Roshanjossey.
+Als dit je eerste pull-verzoek is, bekijk dan [Maak een Pull Request](http://makeapullrequest.com/), dat @kentcdodds heeft gemaakt als een walkthrough video-tutorial. Je kunt ook oefenen met het maken van een pull-verzoek in de [First Contributions](https://github.com/Roshanjossey/first-contributions) repo, gemaakt door @Roshanjossey.
## Wat gebeurt er nadat u een bijdrage heeft ingeleverd?
-You did it! Congratulations on becoming an open source contributor. We hope it's the first of many.
+Je hebt het gedaan! Gefeliciteerd met het worden van een open source-bijdrager. We hopen dat dit de eerste van vele is.
-After you submit a contribution, one of the following will happen:
+Nadat u een bijdrage heeft ingeleverd, gebeurt een van de volgende zaken:
-### 😭 You don't get a response.
+### 😭 U krijgt geen antwoord.
-Hopefully you [checked the project for signs of activity](#a-checklist-before-you-contribute) before making a contribution. Even on an active project, however, it's possible that your contribution won't get a response.
+Hopelijk heb je [het project gecontroleerd op tekenen van een checklist voordat je bijdraagt](#een-checklist-voordat-u-bijdraagt) voordat je een bijdrage levert. Zelfs bij een actief project is het echter mogelijk dat uw bijdrage geen reactie krijgt.
-If you haven't gotten a response in over a week, it's fair to politely respond in that same thread, asking someone for a review. If you know the name of the right person to review your contribution, you can @-mention them in that thread.
+Als je al meer dan een week geen reactie hebt gekregen, is het redelijk om beleefd te reageren in dezelfde thread en iemand om een recensie te vragen. Als u de naam kent van de juiste persoon om uw bijdrage te beoordelen, kunt u deze @-vermelding in die thread.
-**Don't** reach out to that person privately; remember that public communication is vital to open source projects.
+**Reik niet** privé naar die persoon; Onthoud dat openbare communicatie essentieel is voor open source-projecten.
-If you make a polite bump and still nobody responds, it's possible that nobody will respond, ever. It's not a great feeling, but don't let that discourage you. It's happened to everyone! There are many possible reasons why you didn't get a response, including personal circumstances that may be out of your control. Try to find another project or way to contribute. If anything, this is a good reason not to invest too much time in making a contribution before other community members are engaged and responsive.
+Als je een beleefde hobbel maakt en nog steeds niemand reageert, is het mogelijk dat niemand ooit zal reageren. Het is geen geweldig gevoel, maar laat dat je niet ontmoedigen. Het is iedereen overkomen! Er zijn veel mogelijke redenen waarom u geen reactie heeft gekregen, waaronder persoonlijke omstandigheden waar u mogelijk geen controle over heeft. Probeer een ander project of een andere manier te vinden om bij te dragen. Dit is in ieder geval een goede reden om niet te veel tijd te investeren in het leveren van een bijdrage voordat andere leden van de gemeenschap betrokken en responsief zijn.
-### 🚧 Someone requests changes to your contribution.
+### 🚧 Iemand vraagt om wijzigingen in uw bijdrage.
-It's common that you'll be asked to make changes to your contribution, whether that's feedback on the scope of your idea, or changes to your code.
+Het komt vaak voor dat u wordt gevraagd om wijzigingen aan te brengen in uw bijdrage, of dat nu feedback is over de reikwijdte van uw idee of wijzigingen in uw code.
-When someone requests changes, be responsive. They've taken the time to review your contribution. Opening a PR and walking away is bad form. If you don't know how to make changes, research the problem, then ask for help if you need it.
+Reageer als iemand om veranderingen vraagt. Ze hebben de tijd genomen om uw bijdrage te herzien. Een PR openen en weglopen is een slechte vorm. Als u niet weet hoe u wijzigingen moet aanbrengen, onderzoek dan het probleem en vraag indien nodig om hulp.
-If you don't have time to work on the issue anymore (for example, if the conversation has been going on for months, and your circumstances have changed), let the maintainer know so they're not expecting a response. Someone else may be happy to take over.
+Als je geen tijd meer hebt om aan de kwestie te werken (bijvoorbeeld als het gesprek al maanden aan de gang is en je omstandigheden zijn veranderd), laat het de beheerder dan weten, zodat hij geen reactie verwacht. Iemand anders neemt het misschien graag over.
-### 👎 Your contribution doesn't get accepted.
+### 👎 Uw bijdrage wordt niet geaccepteerd.
-Your contribution may or may not be accepted in the end. Hopefully you didn't put too much work into it already. If you're not sure why it wasn't accepted, it's perfectly reasonable to ask the maintainer for feedback and clarification. Ultimately, however, you'll need to respect that this is their decision. Don't argue or get hostile. You're always welcome to fork and work on your own version if you disagree!
+Uw bijdrage kan uiteindelijk wel of niet worden geaccepteerd. Hopelijk heb je er niet al te veel werk in gestoken. Als u niet zeker weet waarom het niet werd geaccepteerd, is het volkomen redelijk om de beheerder om feedback en opheldering te vragen. Uiteindelijk moet u echter respecteren dat dit hun beslissing is. Maak geen ruzie en word niet vijandig. Je bent altijd welkom om te fork en aan je eigen versie te werken als je het niet eens bent!
-### 🎉 Your contribution gets accepted.
+### 🎉 Uw bijdrage wordt geaccepteerd.
-Hooray! You've successfully made an open source contribution!
+Hoera! Je hebt met succes een open source bijdrage geleverd!
-## You did it!
+## Je hebt het gedaan!
-Whether you just made your first open source contribution, or you're looking for new ways to contribute, we hope you're inspired to take action. Even if your contribution wasn't accepted, don't forget to say thanks when a maintainer put effort into helping you. Open source is made by people like you: one issue, pull request, comment, or high-five at a time.
+Of je nu net je eerste open source-bijdrage hebt geleverd of op zoek bent naar nieuwe manieren om bij te dragen, we hopen dat je geïnspireerd bent om actie te ondernemen. Zelfs als uw bijdrage niet werd geaccepteerd, vergeet dan niet te bedanken wanneer een onderhouder moeite heeft gedaan om u te helpen. Open source wordt gemaakt door mensen zoals jij: één probleem, pull-verzoek, opmerking of high-five tegelijk.
From 6fcf43fa8f3df83f2ad3bf04c659fe348f6ebef8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam Chen
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2020 19:48:00 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 074/749] Update branch name
Currently the link was broken because of branch `master` renamed to `main`.
---
_includes/footer.html | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/_includes/footer.html b/_includes/footer.html
index 1344c683370..3bf511f15bd 100644
--- a/_includes/footer.html
+++ b/_includes/footer.html
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
{{ t.footer.contribute.heading }}
{{ t.footer.contribute.description }}
-
+
{{ t.footer.contribute.button }}
From fc18f11c81dd87768f6cb9dbe422d58178309ac2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "dependabot-preview[bot]"
<27856297+dependabot-preview[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:01:33 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 075/749] Bump html-proofer from 3.15.3 to 3.16.0
Bumps [html-proofer](https://github.com/gjtorikian/html-proofer) from 3.15.3 to 3.16.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/gjtorikian/html-proofer/releases)
- [Commits](https://github.com/gjtorikian/html-proofer/compare/v3.15.3...v3.16.0)
Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot]
---
Gemfile.lock | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Gemfile.lock b/Gemfile.lock
index b8af9284227..20b79913abd 100644
--- a/Gemfile.lock
+++ b/Gemfile.lock
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ GEM
html-pipeline (2.13.0)
activesupport (>= 2)
nokogiri (>= 1.4)
- html-proofer (3.15.3)
+ html-proofer (3.16.0)
addressable (~> 2.3)
mercenary (~> 0.3)
nokogumbo (~> 2.0)
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ GEM
octokit (4.18.0)
faraday (>= 0.9)
sawyer (~> 0.8.0, >= 0.5.3)
- parallel (1.19.1)
+ parallel (1.19.2)
pathutil (0.16.2)
forwardable-extended (~> 2.6)
public_suffix (3.1.1)
From 9a4496b0313044a0d45b09cd2541f1e3bb0e4b08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Bampton
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:09:08 +1000
Subject: [PATCH 076/749] Fix case of GitHub.
Changed `Github` to `GitHub`.
---
_articles/es/leadership-and-governance.md | 2 +-
_articles/id/how-to-contribute.md | 2 +-
_articles/id/leadership-and-governance.md | 2 +-
_articles/ko/legal.md | 2 +-
_articles/zh-hans/finding-users.md | 4 ++--
_articles/zh-hans/legal.md | 2 +-
_articles/zh-hans/metrics.md | 4 ++--
_articles/zh-hant/best-practices.md | 2 +-
_articles/zh-hant/finding-users.md | 4 ++--
_articles/zh-hant/metrics.md | 4 ++--
_data/locales/fr.yml | 2 +-
_data/locales/id.yml | 2 +-
12 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/_articles/es/leadership-and-governance.md b/_articles/es/leadership-and-governance.md
index 6d4bff40845..851bdb87850 100644
--- a/_articles/es/leadership-and-governance.md
+++ b/_articles/es/leadership-and-governance.md
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ Si usted es parte de una empresa lanzando un proyecto de código abierto,
- Nosotros asignamos pequeños equipos para gestionar proyectos en Github, los cuales está actualmente trabajando en ellos en Facebook. Por ejemplo, React es ejecutado por un Ingeniero de React.
+ Nosotros asignamos pequeños equipos para gestionar proyectos en GitHub, los cuales está actualmente trabajando en ellos en Facebook. Por ejemplo, React es ejecutado por un Ingeniero de React.
— @caabernathy, ["Una vista interna del código abierto en Facebook"](https://opensource.com/life/15/10/ato-interview-christine-abernathy-facebook)
diff --git a/_articles/id/how-to-contribute.md b/_articles/id/how-to-contribute.md
index 186ad3100f6..32fb5cdd575 100644
--- a/_articles/id/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/_articles/id/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ Jika Anda tidak bisa menemukan ide Anda dimanapun, Anda siap untuk bergerak. Jik
Sebelum Anda membuka sebuah laporan masalah atau melakukan pull request, periksa dokumen kontribusi proyek (biasanya pada dokumen bernama CONTRIBUTING, atau pada README), untuk melihat apakah Anda perlu mencantumkan informasi yang spesifik. Sebagai contoh, mereka mungkin meminta Anda untuk mengikuti sebuah template, atau mengharuskan Anda untuk menggunakan perangkat pengujian.
-Jika Anda hendak melakukan kontribusi yang cukup substansial, buatlah sebuah laporan masalah sebelum memulai bekerja. Sangatlah bermanfaat untuk mengamati proyek dalam kurun waktu tertentu (pada Github, [Anda bisa memilih menu "Watch"](https://help.github.com/articles/watching-repositories/) untuk mendapatkan notifikasi dari semua percakapan), dan mengenal anggota komunitas, sebelum memulai pekerjaan yang belum tentu akan diterima.
+Jika Anda hendak melakukan kontribusi yang cukup substansial, buatlah sebuah laporan masalah sebelum memulai bekerja. Sangatlah bermanfaat untuk mengamati proyek dalam kurun waktu tertentu (pada GitHub, [Anda bisa memilih menu "Watch"](https://help.github.com/articles/watching-repositories/) untuk mendapatkan notifikasi dari semua percakapan), dan mengenal anggota komunitas, sebelum memulai pekerjaan yang belum tentu akan diterima.