Advantages of moving back to Giraffe #636
-
Hey 👋🏽 We moved to Oxpecker early this year to give us the possiblity to use OpenAPI. However, we generally would prefer using the most used package, so when Giraffe got support for OpenAPI we have been considering moving back. The question is, is there real advantages with Giraffe when we have OpenAPI specs on all endpoints? Any pointers or just thoughts would be greatly apperciated. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments
-
Giraffe's code is similar to what Oxpecker has in this regard. It was added by this PR: #599. And there's this sample project: https://github.com/giraffe-fsharp/Giraffe.OpenApi. If you'd like to dig deeper, please compare the Routing from Oxpecker with the EndpointRouting from Giraffe. Also, there's more information about this code at this issue: #488. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @64J0, Thank you for replying! I checked out the code and thread you shared. It gave me all the information i was looking for, thank you ^^ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Giraffe's code is similar to what Oxpecker has in this regard. It was added by this PR: #599. And there's this sample project: https://github.com/giraffe-fsharp/Giraffe.OpenApi.
If you'd like to dig deeper, please compare the Routing from Oxpecker with the EndpointRouting from Giraffe.
Also, there's more information about this code at this issue: #488.