You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello.
First of all, I want to thank the author of this wonderful library, it is very good, I like it a lot
and it works much faster than beautifulsoup + lxml, the difference is palpable!.
In general, PyQuery is faster than all other existing libraries.
But there is one small problem. $("selector").text()
This is done in an average of 10 - 25 MS.
I have a huge volume of pages that need to be processed and most of the time the code spends in the function .text()
Is there any way to speed this up?
A large number of parallel threads did not solve the problem. Yes, it turns out faster in multithreaded mode than in single-threaded mode, but not by much.
I also noticed that in Python 3.12 the speed is 1% faster than in 3.11
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello.
First of all, I want to thank the author of this wonderful library, it is very good, I like it a lot
and it works much faster than beautifulsoup + lxml, the difference is palpable!.
In general, PyQuery is faster than all other existing libraries.
But there is one small problem.
$("selector").text()
This is done in an average of 10 - 25 MS.
I have a huge volume of pages that need to be processed and most of the time the code spends in the function
.text()
Is there any way to speed this up?
A large number of parallel threads did not solve the problem. Yes, it turns out faster in multithreaded mode than in single-threaded mode, but not by much.
I also noticed that in Python 3.12 the speed is 1% faster than in 3.11
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: