Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistent naming of sim_telarray #1343

Open
GernotMaier opened this issue Feb 3, 2025 · 5 comments
Open

Inconsistent naming of sim_telarray #1343

GernotMaier opened this issue Feb 3, 2025 · 5 comments

Comments

@GernotMaier
Copy link
Contributor

There is a bit of an inconsistency in the name of sim_telarray in the code:

  • model_parameters calls it simtel: self._simulation_config_parameters = {"corsika": {}, "simtel": {}}
  • db_handler in generally sim_telarray (e.g., in collection="configuration_sim_telarray",
  • the schema file list the software packages as sim_telarray

Would be easier to have one single name (e.g., we could remove the list of hardwired config parameters).

(this is a minor issue)

@GernotMaier GernotMaier changed the title Inconstistent naming of sim_telarray Inconsistent naming of sim_telarray Feb 3, 2025
@orelgueta
Copy link
Contributor

I think KB would vote for changing to sim_telarray everywhere.

@GernotMaier
Copy link
Contributor Author

I know and I can understand (I do not like it either when others are changing the name of 'my' software).

There is a small and a larger possibility to change:

  • make sure that the software is always called sim_telarray in all configurations, schemas, dictionary (mostly the issue; this would also simplify the code)
  • by very consistent and rename also all modules in simtools.simtel

@orelgueta
Copy link
Contributor

I would vote to do it everywhere. I can even try and volunteer to do it if I have some "dead time" in the next few weeks.

@GernotMaier
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think you should use your dead time for something better.

Anyway, this would be my list to approach this issue:

@orelgueta
Copy link
Contributor

OK, sounds like a good plan!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants