You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since buckets are in general created via an ObjectBucketClaim in K8s, would it be possible to include the OBC namespace in the bucket's metric?
One way is to map the bucket name so an ObjectBucket K8s object (spec.bucketName), then map the latter to an ObjectBucketClaim and extract the namespace from it.
This will be useful eg. for alerting rules, where bucket quota is defined inside the ObjectBucketClaim.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You're right, but COSI is still in alpha and rook mentions it as "experimental".
How different would the implementation be? I can imagine it's not so different if it would more or less only be about porting ObjectBuckets and ObjectBucketClaims to Buckets and BucketClaims respectively.. Thus we could already have this feature in production for OBCs until COSI is production ready.
Regarding the execution time I can imagine this could be circumvented via a toggle flag :D
galexrt
changed the title
Include OBC namespace in bucket metrics
OBC/COSI: Include OBC namespace in bucket metrics
Dec 9, 2024
Since buckets are in general created via an ObjectBucketClaim in K8s, would it be possible to include the OBC namespace in the bucket's metric?
One way is to map the bucket name so an ObjectBucket K8s object (spec.bucketName), then map the latter to an ObjectBucketClaim and extract the namespace from it.
This will be useful eg. for alerting rules, where bucket quota is defined inside the ObjectBucketClaim.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: