You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looking further at Matlab I see that their is an interesting disconnect between the form [t y] = ode45(...) and sol = ode45(...). The structure version, using sol, is far more flexible. With dense output being generated using deval(sol, tspan, [varIdx...]).
In a sense what I am currently during is a bit of a hybrid where both versions (the grided, and dense output versions) having the diagnostics etc. Now I am less clear as I think about this if this is the correct way of doing this, should I only support the dense version where the solver grid points are saved and then a mechanism like deval is used to get gridded solutions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Looking further at Matlab I see that their is an interesting disconnect between the form
[t y] = ode45(...)
andsol = ode45(...)
. The structure version, usingsol
, is far more flexible. With dense output being generated usingdeval(sol, tspan, [varIdx...])
.In a sense what I am currently during is a bit of a hybrid where both versions (the grided, and dense output versions) having the diagnostics etc. Now I am less clear as I think about this if this is the correct way of doing this, should I only support the dense version where the solver grid points are saved and then a mechanism like
deval
is used to get gridded solutions?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: