You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be useful for the interpretation of logs contained in a MEV share bundle if the block number or block hash was included. Sure, one can assume that it is for the current block, however due to network latencies, this could be wrong. An easy fix is to include the block hash of the block it was simulated on.
Also the validity would be nice to have.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be useful for the interpretation of logs contained in a MEV share bundle if the block number or block hash was included. Sure, one can assume that it is for the current block, however due to network latencies, this could be wrong. An easy fix is to include the block hash of the block it was simulated on.
Also the validity would be nice to have.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: